his face isn't paralyzed anymore! happy for him

@trewqpoiutl9774

5 жыл бұрын

Bells pallsy

@ilovebjorksomuch3189

5 жыл бұрын

Cocaine gives you facial paralysis

@dontaskme9047

5 жыл бұрын

@@ilovebjorksomuch3189 That explains the constant sniffing.

@TheInundation

5 жыл бұрын

World's Strongest Man Hafthor Bjornsson had it, too, recently. I had a radial ulnar palsy, incapacitated my hand for months. Terrifying

@joanofarc33

5 жыл бұрын

COYG19 But his nose still belongs on a NyQuil commercial

Zizek comment sections are always fascinating. It's always marxists shitting on him because he doesn't worship the USSR, right wingers shitting on him because they think he's a traditional marxist who worships the USSR, and pretentious people who mock him for not being the stereotype of a snobby philosopher. It's a shame really, the things he says are legitimately interesting.

@daaronk

5 жыл бұрын

a lot of that is true but (hold on to your pants) he is Richard spencer´s favorite marxist philosopher

@SherryNiles1312

5 жыл бұрын

daaronk whaaaat? No way

@SherryNiles1312

5 жыл бұрын

Andrés Gómez don’t forget the people who have to comment on his sniffing.

@daaronk

5 жыл бұрын

@@SherryNiles1312 you bet mario … … i watch quite a few right wing podcasts and he´s mentioned it not once but several times ..

@plalondecai

5 жыл бұрын

Hombre para comentarios rimbombantes los de la vida moderna pero bueno.... por este comentario tuyo in english ... te doy un treh.... :p

Perfect example of intellectual madness. Love him.

@ntatemohlomi2884

2 жыл бұрын

Yes, proper intellectuals must as a matter of course be a little mad.

Really surprised to see people having trouble understanding what he is saying, i had the opposite experience. Every point was articulated very clearly

@esterhudson5104

5 жыл бұрын

Lunarwolff Did you light up?

@wishyouwerehere1984

5 жыл бұрын

He has point. It's understandable to me. But, he has no evidence and data to support his claims. Only Plato, Hegel, etc.

@dangabrielrusu2312

5 жыл бұрын

Data as suggested by you could only cover symptomatology. It's an epistemological problem for you.

@Jomo326

5 жыл бұрын

He jumps from topic to topic and to me he doesn't seem to make a point. I like his jokes though

@marko1263

5 жыл бұрын

​@@Jomo326He used jokes precisely to illustrate his philosophical points, which would otherwise be much more difficult to convey. And i frankly find it hard to believe you missed his criticism of feminism (metoo), political correctness, his points about Marxism, his problems with Jordan Peterson, his criticism of direct democracy, anti semitism and so much more..

Who would love to see Peterson Vs Zizek?

@MrStojkovicj

5 жыл бұрын

not particularly.

@lucasfabisiak9586

5 жыл бұрын

Jovan Stojkovic Why not?

@michaelcroteau3836

5 жыл бұрын

It might be interesting if Zizek could stay sober enough to maintain some basic level of coherency, but I imagine the whole conversation would consist of Peterson trying to pin Zizek to a specific definition or position.

@MrStojkovicj

5 жыл бұрын

​@@lucasfabisiak9586 As he puts it in the video, Peterson is busy trying to be the wise man - he doesn't theorize the way Professor Zizek does. I also find Peterson to be a little too stiff and not as interested in the questions that Zizek raises.

@Godamarco

5 жыл бұрын

I would like to see this, but I have a feeling it would look something like Peterson asking specific questions and Zizek "answering" with his usual off-road monologues. Seems to me like Zizek brings up interesting points and reveals troubling paradoxes without ever fully delving into them.

Happy to see him doing well.

Who wants to see Pavoj Sleterson vs. Zordan Jizek?

@Supernautiloid

5 жыл бұрын

Throw in Hiss Chredges and Choam Nomsky and I’m in.

@amphinomous9155

5 жыл бұрын

I dont think it is interesting. Zizek is "real". Peterson just internet cult leader and biznessmen. Man sell selfhelp book. "Do this and that and you life can change". Its discusting

@CrazyLinguiniLegs

5 жыл бұрын

@@amphinomous9155 yeah, well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

@pathocrat

5 жыл бұрын

@@amphinomous9155 At least Zizek became a well-known philosopher for his work in philosophy. Peterson's fame has little to do with his academic work.

@CrazyLinguiniLegs

5 жыл бұрын

Alienated TV that's partly true. Peterson's INITIAL fame came as a result of his public stance on transgender pronouns. But his SUSTAINED and continuously growing fame has stemmed from his psychological and philosophical work, upon which his self-help material is based. If all there was to the guy was his anti-trans-pronoun position, he would have faded away long ago.

Love Zizek.. Thank you for the upload.

Peoples may find this man’s many tics funny but how many of thoses fools, could even wrapp their minds around even contemplating the very idea to give his lectures in front of international television cameras and in front of the most prestigious academic institutions if they had thoses very same tics or other visible disorders. I believe that the peoples who laugh at this man, being put in his shoes under the same conditions would never leave their hidding places and pretty much die there. I think this man has some of the biggest pair of pure solid brass testicules... and he also happens to be an academic super heavyweight...

This is my favourite stand up set.

thanks for putting the videos online so quickly !

What I really enjoy about zizek is how he's in a way the ultimate centrist, he will find something to critique in any movement and its extremes.

Smart man Slavoj Zizec. He pretends to have these nervous tics so that people get frustrated watching him and buying his books.

@fatalis3920

5 жыл бұрын

Ha ha

He's pouring the great thoughts directly from his nose via his hands. Brilliant.

@alkzavaleta7876

Жыл бұрын

I almost spit my tea jajaj

Slavoj's slip of the tongue at 25:20 is so great dark humor.

I have cited him but I will never shake his hand, never.

@jodawgsup

5 жыл бұрын

Must be hard to be a germaphobe.

@pathocrat

5 жыл бұрын

Tip from the pros: go in for the Roman forearm grab.

@manaloola2018

5 жыл бұрын

1drkstr ha! I said the same thing on a different video

@dontaskme9047

5 жыл бұрын

@@pathocrat What do you do with the elbow full of snot?

@beefknuckles

5 жыл бұрын

hahah true that

Healthcare must be really bad in Slovenia if Zizek has had a cold for the last 20 years

@gurjotsingh8934

5 жыл бұрын

At least better than America.

@Ivan-qf4mt

4 жыл бұрын

@Douglas Sirk lol, yes.

@SmartSleeper

4 жыл бұрын

you have no idea how good it is compared to US and other parts of the world

@gnomechompsky8853

4 жыл бұрын

I just hope someone sanitized the podium after he finished. Good grief!

@paulmaartin

3 жыл бұрын

That's another reason why communist Yugoslavia should come back

Zizek is one of my favorite people to listen to. He says many interesting things here, some of which seem incompatible. 22:21 He says all functioning democracies require a fundamental agreement or consensus in the background, and that the disintegration of this fundamental agreement leads to political polarization and ideological civil war. I agree with that, particularly in the U.S., but there's still a common culture of consumerism holding it together. He then says that he believes we should adopt a "culture of discretion", where people tolerate "otherness". 50:31 He then goes on to say that he believes in "well functioning" bureaucracy, and a society with "proper distances" where people don't have to like each other, or really understand each other, as long as they tolerate each other. Metaphorically, I would describe this position as a kind of ideological isolationism, where multiple ideologies exist and none try to dominate the other. But the problem with this position is that the "well functioning" bureaucracy he envisions is a product of, and subject to, ideology. Really, the fundamental agreement or consensus he described as a necessity for a functioning democracy is just a common ideology. And if the common ideology that united society has disintegrated, how can a new one be established voluntarily? I don't think it can. And that's mainly because when the common ideology disintegrates, so does identity. So the old identity declines (nationalism, democratic liberalism) for several reasons, and new identities gain prominence (political parties). And typically, this fundamental divide and loss of common identity can only be resolved if a nation splits voluntarily, which I don't think ever happens, or through a civil war, which I think almost always happens. But what's interesting about this ideological divide in the U.S. is that it's happening at a time when people are totally dependent on civilization, technology, infrastructure, etc., with a high standard of living, and still united by consumerism, so there is no actual potential for a real civil war. Nor will it split voluntarily, because it would be too disruptive to the economy and infrastructure, and at their core, people are still consumers. It will be interesting to see how this issue resolves, but I suspect that in the long run it won't matter, because everyone will be too busy playing video games.

@thatguy12351

4 жыл бұрын

This is such a well written point.

@redlemur7944

4 жыл бұрын

I agree with your point but. there is probably an answer to your doubts if you read some of his books or watch more talks where he addresses your criticism. He says ecological disaster or some other form of chaos could spark people to create a different system as a result of capitalism. What the new system is he says, he does not know exactly. But, the new system would be something global and, I am guessing less democratic so that ecological disasters and problems that require quicker stronger action can be accomplished. I do not know a lot so take what i say with a grain of sand or salt. I would like to talk or point out the topic of veganism because from my research animal agriculture causes a lot of problems and, I would argue the majority of problems are societies face today. I agree though that the way that humans think and act is ultimately why we have problems. I also am writing this comment just to sound smart lol but, I am trying to just to focus on the problem; and, I learned so much from watching these talks. I cannot wait to buy his books.

@ebrem557

2 жыл бұрын

Bureaucracy, in my opinion, shouldn't be seen as a product of ideology. It can be envisioned as a structure that interacts with these isolated ideologies but that, at its core, its pure objective is to be efficient in the completition of its processes within society. Whether society has a common ideology or a mixture of isolated ideologies is irrelevant to the functioning of this bureaucracy. However, indeed it will be subject to the ideologies that establish the ends of its administration and processes.

@4d461

2 жыл бұрын

@@ebrem557 Lol no human bureaucracy functions without a common set of beliefs whether it be profit or patriotism. Ideology cannot be disentangled from any organized human endeavor.

with all due respect to this man, i would decline any offer to shake his hand!

@CrazyLinguiniLegs

5 жыл бұрын

You don't like old man snot and titty sweat?!

@peterahcin2763

5 жыл бұрын

Karl Urbahn Just how much respect is then due in this case? Without any respect you would decline....

@carteor

5 жыл бұрын

Why would he offer you that

@allybally0021

4 жыл бұрын

Ja, ich verstehe.

@markf5220

3 жыл бұрын

Especially nowadays 😐

Always respect for his authentic move.

Thank you for fixing the spinning shield, that was super distracting.

5:23 Never seen anyone in history drinking a beer like that! That's epic.

@carlhartwell7978

2 жыл бұрын

I don't know, if I looked at myself in the mirror during my first sup I might have seen something similar!

Love you .from iran❤

@yusofplayed

5 жыл бұрын

azade azad message me, another Iranian Zizek fan here

i cannot believe that there were people in the audience who were just not paying attention to slavoj

He pretty much orated and discussed much of what he has written-- a lot from "Less than Nothing", "Sublime object of Ideology" and of course "Contingency, Hegemony, Universality: Contemporary Dialogues On The Left". Nonetheless, its interesting to listen him!

Seriously thought he was flailing harder than usual 'til I realized I had it at 1.25 speed.

My god I have the same shoes as Slavoj! That is the comodity fetishism at it's purest as those are very comfortable and have no shoelaces.

I was that guy in Nike shirt with the beer seems like such a nice night out.

Handkerchiefs were thin on the ground that day, a relict of the past, a fading memory of the good old days.

Con RESPETUOSOS saludos 😷 Maestro SlavojZizek. ✍️🕵️🌛💜🌜🕵️🍒🤔✨🌹🍁✨🌏🌎🌍☄️

This one is excellent

Zizek has a lot of interesting things to say, but his critique of wisdom seems to confuse the concept with popular "wise" cliches. Socrates was a lover of "wisdom" as something which he couldn't attain, and Plato certainly didn't see true "sophia" in the sophists. It's odd too, since he is a philosopher and the traditional definition of that term is a "lover of wisdom" - not in the sense of loving popular cliches, but striving towards deeper knowledge (like, say, an understanding of how ideology structures our experience and lifestyles).

@izrick2841

5 жыл бұрын

The "lover of wisdom" trope, which leads to the development of the hysterical questioning subject Z is staning, is a transvaluation, of the existing wise man/priest figure who "has" or reveals wisdom the, the methods of access always being somewhat mystified and exclusive. Petersons participation in the wise man/preist trope are numerous, but most telling for me is his role as a purveyor of paywalled personality tests.

@richrich7664

5 жыл бұрын

i think he is saying wisdom is self fulling prophecy that only serves its own oppertunistic purpose that can be somewhat problematic like stabilizing something that is unsustanable like surplue enjoyment, jouiisance...

@sankarchaya

5 жыл бұрын

I get the popular notion of wisdom that he is talking about, but those are all examples of sophism, rhetoric and popular belief. I think the point of being a philosopher is that you recognize that those don't constitute actual wisdom, but only a mirage. It's analogous to pseudoscience as a kind of pseudosophia. By abandoning the concept of wisdom in my mind you're throwing out the baby with the bathwater, since wisdom is itself still a useful concept (recognizing false consciousness and ideology, for example, is a form of wisdom in the Platonic sense - literally, trying to escape the cave). Instead of giving wisdom to false prophets like Peterson, claim it for ourselves.

@daquidi

2 жыл бұрын

Zizek is a hegelian and that s why he rejects even the ancient Greek notion of wisdom that you praise. Zizek demands a resolution, he prefers someone like Peterson over philosophers who invest themselves in truth and ponderous philosophical discourses that lack materiality. That s why a lot of philosophers don t like Zizek, claiming he is posturing, he combines film, music, psychoanalysis, cultural criticism, metaphysics, theology, philosophy, politics, economy. He demands unity and thereby transgression... Jordan Peterson is wrong, no question, Zizek hates Jung, but Zizek still prefers an idiot thinker like Peterson over a not-yet-hegelian like Brandom. Peterson may be wrong, but at least he dares to be. Brandom is just hiding behind truth, turning philosophy into some useless language.

please someone help me to understand the context of this talk? what is he discussing?

2:24 cameraman thinks Hermione's cute 4:15 Hermione picks a booger

@arhael1

5 жыл бұрын

She's still cute tho

@CrazyLinguiniLegs

5 жыл бұрын

@@arhael1 that, she is.

@nejcasx

5 жыл бұрын

how about mast... in publ... ? 1:12:20

@CrazyLinguiniLegs

5 жыл бұрын

nejcasx lol, that guy in his fuckin shorts rubbing his junk? Thanks, I missed that 😂

@nimbydimby

5 жыл бұрын

The air was as dry as my humour, so she had no choice.

he has been touching his watery face, spitting, yet the interviewer looks at him with sheer admiration. That there is the power of brut, radical and being-piercing thought !

@TheInes5

3 жыл бұрын

He is very admirable

I can find the book the student mentions: The Capitalist Unconscious: Marx and Lacan by Samo Tomšič but have nothing to go on to find the books Zizek mentions: one on Brazilian secret police's warped buddhism and the other purportedly with the title "the Nazi ethics" but I find no such book title.

@DraconianPolicy

5 жыл бұрын

I'm not sure about the book on Brazilian authoritarian spirituality, but I believe the other book he is referring to is actually called "The Nazi Conscience".

The main thing I have always hated about the philosophy community is that so many of us make idols of these thinkers.... they are not infallible and deserve criticism and rebuttals when they make blunders in their arguments. While you may agree with someone on a great many topics, you should be weary of this idolization that isn’t conducive to intellectual rigor or growth..

@VeggieRice

3 жыл бұрын

Do you have an actual point, and is it something that applies to this vid? I ask bc it seems like you're just generalizing and grandstanding for attention. Nothing relevant to say specifically? Fine. Take your spitball shop talk to a more appropriate discussion.

@VictoriaAntonetti

3 жыл бұрын

@@VeggieRice I won't repeat my point because it is pretty obvious what I meant. With respect to having anything to say that actually applies to this video, I'm quite confused why you even said that. Comment sections are open spaces for any discussion. I had watched a few videos before watching this and noticed a trend from their comment sections and from in person experience at philosophy lectures/events. I commented what I did to see if it was a phenomenon others noticed as well and it clearly was since some people liked my comment. Just because a discussion seems overgeneralized or pointless to you doesn't make it invalid....

@VictoriaAntonetti

3 жыл бұрын

@job RothbergI don't hate the community. You can hate an aspect of something and not hate the thing as a whole. I understand where you are coming from with what you said and while I agree that the community should theoretically be the way you say it is, it is a human endeavor and because of that, it is going to have issues in meeting the theoretical goals it has. I don't think all people are like this or that the community is much worse in this respect than other communities but it's also not perfect. This was just me pointing out an imperfection.

@sisyphus_strives5463

Жыл бұрын

Fair enough. If one holds a philosopher in one's heart how can one become a philosopher? If one holds the buddha in their heart, how can they become a buddha?

Hope I never have a nightmare in which I ring a call centre, and this guy answers.

Thank you Slavoj for getting to the heart of the matter. We are all "+" , ha ha ha. I do not think Jordan would disagree.

My goodness, in this lecture Zizek exaggerates the sniffing enormously!

Critique of Jordan Peterson, at 32:25 onwards.

which book on brazil is he talking about??

The best part about these Q&A sessions is how it demystifies an ivy league education and proves definitively that students of Cambridge are no more intelligent than your average 12 year old.

@romankolarik3274

3 ай бұрын

I live very very near cambridge n this is true

How did I just hear about this guy?! He utterly fascinates me, and has an ability to disarm peoples apprehensions with his speaking style, humor, and authenticity. Really appreciate the talk Slavoj and Cambridge.

@ivanrodopi509

5 жыл бұрын

"His speaking stile,humor,and authenticity"That's all .

Fantastic through out hitting something interesting..

Is the guy with the Nike t-shirt drinking a pint? (Not judging, though. It's me being morbidly curious).

The text info says he is a psychoanalyst. This is not true. He studied psychoanalytic thought but does not work as an analyst. He has admitted this in other public places, I think it was an interview where he said this.

@extraemontamontes3618

5 жыл бұрын

You don't need to exercise psycoanalisis to be a psycoanalist

@dancemaster999

5 жыл бұрын

He's a theoretical pshychoanalyst :) They don't do therapy work.

@MatthewLowery

5 жыл бұрын

He did actually work as a psychoanalyst for a time early on in his career.

@kieranthethomas

5 жыл бұрын

@@extraemontamontes3618 actually you do. i don't know if zizek is an analyst, but there are rigorous requirements for becoming a qualified psychoanalyst, including doing at least 50 hours of analysis (on yourself) with a qualified analyst in the field.

@doublenegation7870

5 жыл бұрын

He psychoanalyzes culture and ideology. We are all very, very sick.

Not a fan of the questions but it would be great if Zizek would answer them.

Wow I have never listened to Zizek. I know he is a popular figure to the left but I have not gotten around to looking into him before this. I was blown away how much he explained that I can totally relate to. I dont know if he is right as everything we are dealing with a subjective opinion about the state of politics society etc but I have written down at least 5 points which I have had running through my head over the past year. Can anyone explain, unfortunetly I am not the smartest, when he refers to the failure of PC on the left is not that its fanatical, but its precisely not Marxism? In what way is it not?

@allendish

5 жыл бұрын

The idea is that today’s left obfuscates basic questions of power relations and economic relations as cultural problems, problems of tolerance etc. Zizek often points out Martin Luther King Jr. to make the point, namely that if you google his speeches, he never once mentions the word “tolerance.” To him, it would have been laughable to say white people don’t tolerate black people enough, because the problems he identified were socio-economic in nature. I hope this helps clarify the topic

@Fwazonly

5 жыл бұрын

For Maxists, PC concerns about separate race, gender, nationality issues are all distractions from class, and are so by design. Divide the working class along identity lines as the PC pseudo-Left and alt-right do, and you disempower them. Marxists were pretty much always vociferously against PC. Now you are smarter-ish.

@hamzariazuddin424

5 жыл бұрын

Allen Dish wow ok thanks for this. I guess I need to look more into Zizek and his philosophy

@hamzariazuddin424

5 жыл бұрын

samson hahah I’m still dumb as they come. But much appreciated. That makes sense at least as a theory. I guess I need to listen more to Zizek as I too am having difficulties working out where I sit in the PC environment debate. I personally would prefer open free speech that may not be PC but is that what other people like/want, I’m not sure.

@GrahamMilkdrop

5 жыл бұрын

@@hamzariazuddin424 Congratulations! 'Not knowing' is true wisdom! We will learn more in one day of 'not knowing' than we will in a 4 years of 'knowing'. The absurd PC brigade are the Petite Bourgeoisie using their privilege to intellectually stomp on the Proletariat... Marx would not approve... ;)

***Spoiler Alert*** I was in such a good mood after listening to Zizek, only to have it spoiled by the youngster say that Omorosa will be speaking later. Who's speaking next week? Yanni Varoufakis and Andrew Dice Clay?

Hopefully someone can reply to this and explain it to me. But i'm skeptical about something zizek is saying from 1:05:00 onwards. He appears to be saying that most people understand Marx' idea of commodity fetishism backwards. The common view of the idea would be that we chase an abstract illusion by elevating commodities as a higher goal beyond their material usefulness. But then zizek says that Marx actually meant to say the opposite thing. Namely that commodity fetishism, when reading marx closely, means that we seek to consciously manufacture our illusion of meaning through the act of gaining material usefulness while being aware of the facade. Or something like that. My problem: isn't the 'common view' exactly what the word 'fetishism' originally means? If zizek is right then why didn't marx call it 'reverse commidity fetishism?'. It seems to me that he used the word for a reason.

It's makes sense because word of mouth and analouge ads are still the most effective way to promote a product.

hard to understand a lot of his points. fascinating guy

"I'm not saying that you here need to get Boris Johnson as PM or whatever" *2019 has left the chat*

Zizek's time allocation is like this: 30% of time, saying things; 30% of time, explaining things said; 40% of time, "and so on and so on", beard and nose grabbing, sniffing.

@Sidiciousify

3 жыл бұрын

Better than 100 percent of one's time obfuscating your industry's questionable ethics.

I love his Lacanian use of something phrased as symbolic castration. That is where we do not get what we inherently desire because of socioeconomic law.

Why do these kids look so bored?!?! lemme take your seat!! I'd be cracking up with a huge smile!!!

@romankolarik3274

7 күн бұрын

they're from cambridge they're all like this

I do love Slavoj!!!

Poor guy surely prepared lots of clever questions only to ask two.

He reminds me so much of Heidegger, so strange cos I haven’t really been following this guy.

Brilliance.

When is the Peterson bit?

@e99fuy0ng

5 жыл бұрын

Listen from around 36:00

Does anyone shake his hand after the speech?

Imagine him and a few buddies and students around a campfire giving this speech. :)

I do admire this chap

I think Zizek would be more comprehensible if he just told his jokes and linked them by the epistemology of the inexorably paradoxical. But is seems likely that being perfectly understood is his life's mission to avoid. The best thing about him is that he always draws back from actually being prescriptive.

somebody in tweed and the guy opposite to him in shorts, gotta love this place

He mentions Peter Sloterdijk at 29:48

Can we band together and buy Cambridge uni a decent mic.

Peterson doesn't deserve to be in the same room with our friend, Slavoj.

@allybally0021

5 жыл бұрын

Rubbish! They would probably get on quite well. They are both high calibre guys who could have a reasoned exchange. I would love to see that.

It's good to see wearing HI-Vis vests indoors appears in all classes.

i love zizek, and i agree with him on almost everything, our politics are pretty much identical, but the only reason i’m not a “zizekian” is because is so dogmatically hegelian and lacanian. he always gets caught in the dialectical loop

If I were in the audience I would be so tempted to sneak up to him to offer him a tissue.

Intro sounds like a 90s VHS

I warned Daffy about his coke and meth habbit years ago, but no. I said, Daffy, I know it increase your creativity and philosophical ideas, but at what cost, Daffy?! At what cost? Not to mention the toll it will take on your looks and your nervous system will undergo irreparable damage. Did Daffy listen? No.

Last moments were truly inspirational ❤

I'm glad he recoverd from the palsy.

I can understand almost everything he said idk about everybody else.

Peterson interviewed Pinker,they didn't debate. They agreed on pretty much everything, either Žižek didn't actually watch the video or he is deliberately trying to mislead.

Zizek the entertainer!

"I will finish with a very naive point. I hope you will agree."

By the random tongue movements he seems to have tardive dyskinesia, and the fact he had guillain barre makes it more suspicious of SSRI use... hope he knows of Dr. Peter Breggin work... he (Zizek) is brilliant and should be aware of its dangers

When you listen to this interview instead of watching you are guessing if Zizek is sniffing lines of coke as he moves to explanation

23:30 the guy sleeping lol

@igoryukht1327

5 жыл бұрын

But a few seconds later Zizek woke him up with an authoritarian sniff, at least.

@myshir0

5 жыл бұрын

Igor Yukht haha

great subs

I don't understand why gender is needed as a necessary part of an identity. Whether I am called a man or a woman does not change my perception of myself, i.e. the identity that I give myself. And the fact whether or not I can identify with the category assigned to me or the other individuals in it does not change my perception of myself. What does a teaspoon have in common with a tablespoon? Are they interchangeable? How often does something like this happen? Is a spoon's identity based on how other people (or spoons) perceive it or how it perceives itself? A serial number, for example, is sufficient to clearly identify a spoon. Whether a serial number describes a spoon or a fork or a knife doesn't matter - well, unless you have utilitarian intentions with these individuals. But the fork can't care less what numbers appear in its serial number. No one (probably including me) can write down the identity that I give myself anyway. How other people (want to) categorize me doesn't matter to me and I can't influence it anyway. Name, date of birth and place of birth are sufficient to identify a human individual. The (biological) gender is not necessary for this, at best as a useful attribute for managing personal data in a medical context.

I am in love with the camera girl in the back.

what a world!

I think he took the "opium is the opium of the people" from the late Rick Roderick.

great vhs intro

A wonderful sense of humor and the jokes, well, they weren’t his own anyway.

Body language of the guy with the green vest kills me 😂 He really hates Zizek

I'm a Peterson fan. This guy is has interesting things to say too though. Am I playing identity politics as Ezra would insist? I love weed. Makes me think deeply/

Jeez, I just read a few comments and a lot of them are about de "sniffing tic". Is just a tic. If you rewatch the video, you'll notice he do it when he's trying to explain something shortly... Almost all the time..

Heidegger advised to philosophize outside of the academy for a reason.

@jonnyblack8101

5 жыл бұрын

So that other academics would get rounded up by Nazis while he sat in his office?

@masteradjuster9408

5 жыл бұрын

lol touche @@jonnyblack8101

agree about love

i want to get wired like zizek and ramble on to a bunch rich kids

The greatest UFC of all time Jordan vs Slavoj

For a second there I thought he looked like Mark Hamill in the thumbnail.

He's buzzing like a mofo!