We're finally reaching Aurangzeb! Excited! www.patreon.com/AlMuqaddimahYT

@Azhar_shaikh1

2 жыл бұрын

Can't wait brother

@mdsabahuddin8251

2 жыл бұрын

He was such a great man.i admire him

@kolotchelemanassanecouliba178

2 жыл бұрын

I think that may be the most controversial episode

@mayankbisht7691

2 жыл бұрын

I think your map is kinda out of scale, Punjab is way North than it is supposed to be.

@hassaanalisiddiqui3827

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah I too want on ottoman sultans

How many people know the Taj Mahal and how many people know about Shah Jahan, theres gonna be an incredible proportion 🙃

@ahmedmoalimabshir4515

2 жыл бұрын

Shah Jehan built Taj Mehal for his wife

@HamzaShafiq629

2 жыл бұрын

I know both of them.

@precious2615

2 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/o2do0JOOeZXbYJs.html Muslima asking ... why don't click ?! Dengerous for Islam ? kzread.info/dash/bejne/ZXeGz8NsZJm4qrQ.html allah & his messenger !.. kzread.info/dash/bejne/o2do0JOOeZXbYJs.html Muslima asking ...

@tazimkhan1326

2 жыл бұрын

I live near at tajmahal so I know very much

@HamzaShafiq629

2 жыл бұрын

@@tazimkhan1326 Interesting. So you live in Agra.

Salam from Mansa Musa of Mali to this great ruler. 🖐🏿

@ayeshasaleem5543

6 ай бұрын

Walaikum asalam❤

@shoto3612

5 ай бұрын

No mughal emperor was a great ruler they were r@cist , r@pist and mass murderers

Two Al Muqaddimah videos in one week? Yes please!

@AlMuqaddimahYT

2 жыл бұрын

The last one was technically last week (but a little late).

"Wealth should be viewed just like the toilet, in that you have need for it and resort to it when necessary, but it has no place in your heart" - Ibn Taymiyyah (Majmu’ Fatawa, 10/663)

@maxtyson9035

2 жыл бұрын

Loved it. But ibn taumiyyah gave rise to radical Islam.

@Ahmad-nf9ez

2 жыл бұрын

@@maxtyson9035 That is not true at all. Ibn Taymiyya was a polymath and one of the greatest scholars in Islamic history. Anyone with an agenda can take small sections of his texts and use them for their own purposes. This can be done with any intellectual or philosopher. Extremists take his statements out of context

@ibrahimmustafa2481

2 жыл бұрын

@@maxtyson9035 pray tell, what is radical Islam!?

@maxtyson9035

2 жыл бұрын

@@ibrahimmustafa2481 you need some help.

@minhajuddin1291

2 жыл бұрын

Shah Jehan was Hanafite 🙃

Before watching the video, I already thought that Shah Jahan was the one who built Taj Mahal as a tomb for his wife. He grieved for her so much his hair turned white. I just didn't know he was a Mughal Emperor, or that the Taj Mahal was only one of the exemplars of Mughal Architecture during his time.

Love your videos. You do such a thorough job in preparation of these episodes. Your channel has really helped me fill some large gaps in my world history knowledge. Thank you for your hard work

Love when you upload videos this quick

Great work, I'm glad you do your research and dont frame history into that orientalist "Clash of Civilizations" narrative between Muslims and Hindus. Looking forward to your video on Aurangzeb!

@rohanindra6401

Жыл бұрын

Why is it orientalist? Islam in India is not complex. Despite a thousand year rule it was pretty much unchanged and orthodox with no assimilation whatsoever. You would be not called Tejas and we would all be dead and replaced by Pashtuns if they were still ruling us.

@nutcrackerreal100

Жыл бұрын

@@rohanindra6401 the mughals were pretty diverse in the mindsets of their rulers, while there were some religious fanatics, there were also many secular leaders

These videos are so enjoyable to watch! Great work, Syawish (Al Muqaddimah), keep it up!

Love the animations! We recently covered him in a World History course that I teach!

@shoto3612

5 ай бұрын

But please don't show him as a good person he wasn't

Shah Jahan gave India many Great and important buildings like Taj Mahal and Red fort. But I heard that he was jailed by Aurangzeb because of him wasting people's tax money on all these architectures....

@maxtyson9035

2 жыл бұрын

Nice, keep it up. But I believe aurangzeb and peshwa bajirao are same when compared with behavior. In short they were lunatics.

@part-timebrock1126

2 жыл бұрын

@@maxtyson9035 lunatics but their enemies feared them. Nobody dared to challenge Aurangzeb in an open battlefield. Only Guerrilla Wars

@maxtyson9035

2 жыл бұрын

@@part-timebrock1126 that's what I said fool, he was only a good strategist. Not even a good one on one fighter. He was not a good ruler. After his death his kingdom became trash. And his so a were controlled by his ministers.

@part-timebrock1126

2 жыл бұрын

@@maxtyson9035 fool, he was a great ruler. Even Maurya Empire collapsed after Ashoka's death and Ashoka is considered the Greatest Indian Monarch. It's not king's fault that after his death, his empire collapsed. It's the fault of those unworthy Rulers who came after that capable King. Aurangzeb ruled the land that was bigger than today's India for almost 49 years. 49 years is a no joke kiddo(Akbar too ruled for 49 years). Even Britishers begged him after Child's War(read about 1st Anglo-Mughal wars).

@maxtyson9035

2 жыл бұрын

@@part-timebrock1126 ashoka was also a lunatic. Its the kings fault. He only thought about conquering. Not in ruling.

I can't believe we get to see such quality of videos for free. Really good work man.

Was searching for a channel like this for a long time

great video, I knew about him already but thanks to you I learned a lot more

5:16 I am sure there was religious aspect as well. It is apparent that modern people prefer political or secular reason for rulers' action which I find disingenuous. People of the past were very religious so I am certain the destruction of temples were as much religious as it was political.

@ghazalabibi4483

2 жыл бұрын

Here's a question: What would a person gain from playing up these rivalries for nothing? Whether you agree or not, religion has always been a political ideology. It's literal purpose was to give a clear goal to the people and establishing a method to reaching a point. Why would there be rivalries when the two, supposed, posing rivalries were on common ground and were living in harmony? It's not like shah Jahan was a very Muslim man, as the video shows. Every time when religion was tarnished or belittled, it served a greater political purpose. Even Aurangzeb, who's infamous for oppressing the minorities, did so to earn the support of the Muslims by presenting with an 'us vs them' narrative.

@ghazalabibi4483

2 жыл бұрын

@@mohdshahwaizkhan290 there aren't just Hindus in India.

@muazzamshaikh2049

2 жыл бұрын

Yes some of them were done for religious and some for political reasons... But it's hard to tell which is which

@blugaledoh2669

2 жыл бұрын

@@muazzamshaikh2049 Yeah, politic and religion were often intertwined.

@ty814

3 ай бұрын

If that was religious why his hindu nobles doesn't leave him?

This is one of your most interesting videos ever!

ones again great video man i really like when you cover the mughals it is on of the most interesting thing i like ti learn about

Really loving your videos on mughal dynasty❤❤ Amazingily informative🔥🔥🔥

I'm curious, you mentioned in the video that Shah Jahan tore down Jujhar Singh's temple as a political move. If that was the case, Shah Jahan fought in the Deccan and in Central Asia - Did he tear down any mosques to make a political statement? Is there any record of this? He also tore down Gurudwaras in Lahore and a Church belonging to the Portuguese. If these were all political wouldn't he have done the same to Mosques of Muslim rulers he was fighting?

@jamieammar6131

2 жыл бұрын

It is kinda sorta political mixed with religious sentiments because how do you hurt the Hindus or any other religious group who held power the most ? Just attack their religious locations, temples etc. He probably didn't tear down mosques because A) He would need those later anyway and B) No point losing popularity among his own subjects.

@shounakbanerjee8904

2 жыл бұрын

What do you expect from a Muslim historian?

@Melon-ALL-Free

2 жыл бұрын

No one should be able to destroy another belief place of worship. That's Islamic rule on war. Every good Muslim would abide by this law but obviously not everyone is a good Muslim.

@ravimathews1973

2 жыл бұрын

@@Melon-ALL-Free Mohammed himself destroyed the idols in the Ka'aba belonging to the non believers. They are just following his example

@Melon-ALL-Free

2 жыл бұрын

So are you going to ignore the fact Muhammad PBUH literally allow Jew and Christian to practice their belief in Medina? One of oldest church in the world are in Egypt. There still Arab Christian nowadays. So are you telling Muslim ruler are not following his example? Ok.

The video is marvelous as always! I wish the war of succession was given some more weightage

Just finished binging all your mughal videos, they are extremely good and I was really sad when I saw I came to the end of all the videos you made until now. I'm probably going to continue reading about them on Wikipedia.

@shoto3612

5 ай бұрын

Don't read on some websites which gives real info they were cruel

@Nixo77

20 күн бұрын

@@shoto3612 cruel or not you cant blame them that was the pre modern era their methods of punishment werent uncommon and you cant compare pre-modern standards to modern day ones.

@shoto3612

20 күн бұрын

@@Nixo77 well i can because i will compare them to kings existed here and that wasn't punishment that was their racial minds wanting to eradicate hindus don't manipulate history by saying oh everyone was cruel but not everyone committed gen0cide, not everyone sold women , not everyone k*lled and t0rtured those who were innocent especially not kings of india except 2-3 so don't give me this .

First one to like and comment here! Happy 😃

Good videos bro keep up the work. From India

Love this video and channel! Very educational on Islamic history, culture, and civilization.

Excellent video Sir! Quite a human story indeed

Underrated channel

You have a lovely voice and this is very well done.

The soundtrack in this video is sooooo good!

From Sindh Pakistan 💚 Plz also make documentary on "Sultan Muhi-din muhamad AURANGZEB alamgeer" a mugal king

@shoto3612

5 ай бұрын

Another r@pist , r@cist person, didn't gave his dying Father a glass of water , killed his brother, killed many hindus approx 40 lakh demolished many mandirs if he is still great for you then you are like rest of Pakistan radicalized and st*pid

Shah Jahan's destruction of the temple was definitely a part of his religious policy as much as it furthered his political moves. Iconoclasm - with the exception of Akbar, Jahangir and parts of Shah Jahan's reign - was a constant feature of Indian Muslim rule.

@mohdshahwaizkhan290

2 жыл бұрын

And construction of temple?

@124akshat

2 жыл бұрын

@@mohdshahwaizkhan290 As he said, it was done under Jahangir...as a reward for the murder of Abu Fazl...Shah Jahan in fact passed a firman explicitly banning construction of new temples (as is customary under muslim law)

@mohdshahwaizkhan290

2 жыл бұрын

@@124akshat ok understood

@crimsoncloak6564

2 жыл бұрын

@@124akshat One correction. I've read that consruction of pagan temples is only not allowed to be paid for by the state. If the pagans can get together enough money, then it is fine.

@124akshat

2 жыл бұрын

@@crimsoncloak6564 I am afraid that is not correct. It customary islamic state law, old temples maybe allowed to persist. New ones are entirely prohibited as that means another creed other than islam is being allowed, and since Islam is the ULTIMATE TRUTH, you cannot really have another opinion propagating itself.

Can you make a video about the engineers of these buildings and stuff. Is there much known about them?

@subhashishbagchi3191

2 жыл бұрын

The Taj Mahal was built in 16th century by Shahjan but he also have ordered to chopped off the hand of mansions so that they cannot build another building like Taj Mahal in other part of world. Go and check reality of engineers and masons who had build the Taj Mahal

@Brahmdagh

2 жыл бұрын

@@subhashishbagchi3191 That's just a legend. Never really happened. Stick to reading actual academic history books in order to learn history.

@subhashishbagchi3191

2 жыл бұрын

@@Brahmdagh It actually have happened, it is well recorded in the history that Shahjan ordered his soldiers to chopped off hands of 20000 masons so that they can't never build such impressive architecture somewhere else. I am from Agra and I know well the history of my city better than any foreigner.

@catanana

Жыл бұрын

Ustad Ahmad Lahauri was the original architect of Taj Mahal

Seriously I haven't seen a person ever with such wow dictation skill.His voice is too good 😇

I AM GASSED FOR THE NEXT EP , YEAYY

8:30 I think this is the first Islamic coin design that I can appreciate. I was raised on the Romans and their incredible coins so... Islamic coins always feel very boring looking to me... Not so with this one! I love how the text is done here! 9:40 That IS the coolest imperial title ever! I actually feel this warmness in my heart seen this vibrante muslim culture of India in your video~ So much of the muslim culture of the Middle-East just feels so baren and void to me... Like a body without a heart that just goes on living...

Someone pls give me the name if background music I'm loving the tune, so soothing, Al Muqadimah help us out pls?? @3:43

Can i use your animation in my videos??

I noticed you talked about sikhs in your eralier videos, can you please make a video on the religious conflict between the sikhs and mughals and important battles between the 2 as well as significant moments.

The intro vibrated my body.

Very educational.

Can you do an video about the Uyunid dynasty

Thanks.

I hope to see you cover the Fatimids and Safavid empire one day

@Ismail-hx4qj

2 жыл бұрын

Safavids maybe but Fatimids is already covered by hikma history

Anyone know the background music? It starts from 1:12

Please do a video on Jahanara Begum...

I’ve been binge watching your channel for Eid (well the whole week) and I want to say something positive in fairness to you, Syawish; it was political (the mandir-barbaadi). You are correct about this. Too bad that the people who need to know this the most refuse to understand.

hey bud... have you considered possibly making some videos about writers, poets, or artists from any discipline... this accounts name is after one of my favorite poet's regardless of origin.... as a Western Man I'd love to be turned onto maybe some new writers or posted mainly but anything along artistic lines would be totally appreciated and much enjoyed

Yup.... stealing this video for my assignment 😀✨

In my studies of the history of India, there is a popular notion that Jahangir became addicted to opium at many times in his life. I can't read the languages of the period, but I see this in the research of Jahangir. Have you seen this? Great channel and content. This is something that has always made me wonder to what extent secondary or even primary sources of a given time can be trusted, especially when a ruler has so many enemies.

@AlMuqaddimahYT

2 жыл бұрын

Oh, yeah, I mentioned it in my Jahangir video. You can check that.

@Brandon-a-writer

2 жыл бұрын

@@AlMuqaddimahYT Thanks very much friend. I am very interested in this particular period in the history of India and I'm sure you know how sources can slander monarchs. I have checked out the Jahangir video. His story is a sad one, for me. Great content, and i love the reference to the work of Ibn Khaldun. His account of meeting with Timur is fascinating! thanks for responding to me personally. I have been watching your content for the last two days now :)

Can u recommend sources or channels for British rule in india

Great

Shahjahan was rude, yet this man was iconic in every possible way. He literally sat on Peacock throne, built The Taj MashAllah and punched 14 children from one women. He was a man hahah!

I REALLY value your historical erudition and intent of wanting to inform, but your vocal delivery leaves many of us not as familiar with the names you pronounce reduces the value of your desire to instruct. Perhaps some reconsideration as to the speed and pacing of your delivery would be of benefit.

Good

can you make a video on banu qurayza tribe

There is fun fact that Shahjan imposed the Zaziya taxation system over non muslims in India and forcibly imposed Sharia over India.( Both Zaziya and Sharia were abolished by akbar in past). The Taj Mahal was built in 16th century by Shahjan but he also have ordered to chopped off the hand of mansions so that they cannot build another building like Taj Mahal in other part of world.

@sankrantis6622

2 жыл бұрын

Shah Jahan’s order to demolish temples in Benaras stated, ‘It has been previously represented that there were some of the finest Hindu temples at Banaras. In former reigns, the foundations of many new ones had been laid, some of which had been completed, while others still remained in an imperfect state; and these the opulent among the pagans were desirous of seeing finished. The infidel-consuming monarch, who is the guardian of true religion, had therefore commanded that at Banaras and throughout the entire imperial dominions, wheresoever idol-temples had been recently built, they should be razed to the ground. Accordingly, in these days, it was reported from the province of Allahabad that 70 had been demolished at Banaras alone (The Shah Jahan Nama of Inayat Khan 1990: 89-90).’

@Myname-wh5yu

Жыл бұрын

Both of these statements are myths Jazaya tax was imposed by arungzeb

Love this channel but too much info packed tightly does not allow me to digest info......so i repeat watch it until.i get it

*On Muslim rulers’ deliberate policy of causing crushing impoverishment of the peasants,* notes Fernand Braudel, ‘The levies Hindus had to pay were so crushing that one catastrophic harvest was enough to unleash famines and epidemics capable of killing a million people at a time. Appalling poverty was the constant counterpart of the conquerors’ opulence, including the splendor of palaces and feasts in Delhi.’ The situation got worse under the reign of Shahjahan (d. 1658) and Aurangzeb (d. 1707). The Muslim rulers ‘founded its luxury on India’s general poverty’ and India, under the Muslim rule, experienced ‘a series of famine, a fabulous death-rate…,’ adds Braudel. - _History of Civilizations_

No mention of Shalamar Bagh, Lahore ? Strange

Nice video from Rupiah 🇮🇩 country

7:28 are you sure it's 14th and not 7th?

can i do an interview with you?>

@sankrantis6622

2 жыл бұрын

Shah Jahan’s order to demolish temples in Benaras stated, ‘It has been previously represented that there were some of the finest Hindu temples at Banaras. In former reigns, the foundations of many new ones had been laid, some of which had been completed, while others still remained in an imperfect state; and these the opulent among the pagans were desirous of seeing finished. The infidel-consuming monarch, who is the guardian of true religion, had therefore commanded that at Banaras and throughout the entire imperial dominions, wheresoever idol-temples had been recently built, they should be razed to the ground. Accordingly, in these days, it was reported from the province of Allahabad that 70 had been demolished at Banaras alone (The Shah Jahan Nama of Inayat Khan

You didn't talk about the military expansion during his reign

Create videos on Safavid Empire

@braderaku

2 жыл бұрын

Yes we need this

Please don't stop making videos

The word "political" has lot of political sense in video , may be the most diplomatic depiction for a softer course on an emperor.

There was greater proportion of Punjabis in the nobility during Shah Jahan's era than ever. The chief architect of Taj Mahal, Ustad Ahmad Lahori; The Grand Vizier Nawab Saadullah Khan and the official biographer, Abdul Hamid Lahori all were Punjabis.

Which Hindu kings destroyed other Hindu temples? What examples?

@none23517

2 жыл бұрын

yes I also want to know

@Shah-iu1bx

2 жыл бұрын

all of them, all these muslim rulers you guys think that destroyed temples ; they basically had alliances with a lot of hindus, so when when one alliance of Hindus and Muslims attached other group of alliance of Hindus and Muslims they destroyed temples and mosques and any other place of worship and other buildings that were necessary to destroy, this is how politics works , even in todays world.

@navinkumarpk86

2 жыл бұрын

@@Shah-iu1bx Give examples not say things without evidence.

@anirudh177

2 жыл бұрын

Very few, Just like how there were very few Muslims who destroyed Mosques, there were very few Hindus who did the same.

@navinkumarpk86

2 жыл бұрын

@@anirudh177 Yeap, these guys make it seem that the Mughals were running a charitable trust...

So shah jahan was only shah jahan in name 💀

@AlMuqaddimahYT

2 жыл бұрын

In 1650, he was probably one of the richest people in the world so, I'd say he was indeed Shah Jahan.

@DistantTravels

2 жыл бұрын

@@AlMuqaddimahYT Ok but if you look at it that way then there are thousands of 'Rulers of the World' or 'Shah Jahans' simultaneously in history & even now.

im excited. not for shah jahan but for the one who comes after Him! "Alamgir."

All that money on architecture, but nothing to speak on military and naval innovation. I wonder if this would have a consequences later on.

@crimsoncloak6564

2 жыл бұрын

Nothing only on naval innovation, because maintaing a large naval force would be quite useless for the Mughals.

@sankrantis6622

2 жыл бұрын

French historian Fernand Braudel writes about wastage of money by Islamic rulers and its consequences on the common population: ‘The levies Indians had to pay were so crushing that one catastrophic harvest was enough to unleash famines and epidemics capable of killing a million people at a time. Appalling poverty was the constant counterpart of the conquerors’ opulence, including the splendor of palaces and feasts in Delhi.’ The situation got worse under the reign of Shahjahan (d. 1658) and Aurangzeb (d. 1707). The Muslim rulers ‘founded its luxury on India’s general poverty’ and India, under the Muslim rule, experienced ‘a series of famine, a fabulous death-rate…,’ adds Braudel. History of Civilizations

Padshah Shah Jahan 💚

@shoto3612

5 ай бұрын

R@pist , mass murder , racist and a lunatic

0:18 😱

Chatrapati shivaji maharaj ki jay 🚩🛐

@iamamr5523

Жыл бұрын

😂😂😂

It's not like Jahangir was a no body, please give him some credit he was an amazing painter.

shah cihan is a turk, we Turks are not even considered important let alone shah cihan, neither babur shah nor akbar shah I'm 13 years old I don't have much English, can you please make videos with Turkish subtitles?

@sultanqalawunkalavun6753

2 жыл бұрын

@Haqaiq Urdu 😂

@MohsinRaza-uq2ow

2 жыл бұрын

@@sultanqalawunkalavun6753 shah jahan was more rajput than Mughal /Turk. His mother and grand mother both were rajputanis

@Myname-wh5yu

Жыл бұрын

Shah Jahan was 3/4 rajput He only spoke Persian and Hindustani He was hardly turkic

Tube inside Taj Mahal had diamond on it but like always British even stole that 😐

I have a doubt why Jahangir died 🤔

What’s with the patreon patrons being named under Islamic dynasties??

@AlMuqaddimahYT

2 жыл бұрын

It's to teach a bit of history in the process.

It was true on that expect that Shah Jahan was the true Mughal among the Mughals. Cause Akbar the empire builder so does his successor Jahangir who maintained but also increased territories. The extreme control over Bengal, Deccan areas and Delhi to Gujrat was the milestone of the revenue of India. Shah Jahan got so into himself he allied himself with Sultan Murad IV on attacking the persian empire also the Uzbeks.

please please remove the music from your videos, at least in future, music is haram and you do just fine presenting beautiful content without it

I hope that you just don't stop at Aurangzeb, there are minor Mugals like Muhammad Shah, Akbar the second or Bahadur Shah Third

( Do Christians And Jews and "OTHER" non-Muslims go to Heaven? ) Quran 2:62 '' Those who believe (in the Quran) and those who follow the Jewish (scriptures) and the Christians and the Sabians->ANYAllah Quran 22:40 [They are] those who have been evicted from their homes without right - only because they say, " Our Lord is God " And were it not that God checks the people, some by means of others, there would have been demolished monasteries, churches, synagogues, and mosques in which the name of God is much mentioned. And God will surely support those who support Him. Indeed, God is Powerful and Exalted in Might. Note: Why did Allah protected Churches and Synagogues if they worship false Allah ? ( Why Are There So Many Different Religions In The World ? ) Quran 5 48 ''...... If God wanted He could have made all of you a single nation.( ie single religion ) But He willed otherwise in order to test you in what He has given you (ie Scriptures) therefore try to excel one another in good deeds. Ultimately you all shall return to God then He will show you the truth of those matters in which you '' >DISPUTE verb Islam mean "submission" to God ( The above verse saying is that God will not accept a religion from the >MUSLIM Question: How Can Muslim And the Non-Muslim "submit" to the God? Answer: Be kind to other human beings and Do not lie, Do not steal, Do not cheat, Do not hurt others, Do not be prideful and Do the charity work. Note: If you obeyed all the ABOVE Allah-God's moral laws "YOU" submitted to God.( ie Islam mean "submission" to God ) The only people who will enter Paradise those who '' Submitted to God '' ( ie by good deeds ) God does NOT accept your religion of birth but only ''Your Total'' Submission to Him. ( God Allows Interfaith Marriages And Eat Food From the Christian And Jew And Vice Versa ) Quran 5:5 ''This day [all] good foods have been made lawful, and the food of those who were given the Scripture (ie Christian and Jew) is lawful for you and your food is lawful for them. And [lawful in marriage are] chaste women from among the believers (ie Muslim ) and chaste women from among those who were given the Scripture (ie Christian and Jew) before you, when you have given them their due compensation, desiring chastity not unlawful sexual intercourse or taking [secret] lovers. And whoever denies the faith - his work has become worthless and he in the Hereafter will be among the losers.'' Note: > Only 14 hundredsSame God ALL Corrupt Question to Muslim and Christian: Does God / Allah only answer your pray ? And God / Allah does not answer non Muslim / non Christian pray? Did Allah '' Canceled '' all other religions Judaism and Christianity? Quran 5:48 '' And We have revealed to you [O Muhammad] the Book in truth, confirming that which preceded it of the Scripture ( ie New and old Testament ) and as a criterion over it. So judge between them by what Allah has revealed and do not follow their inclinations away from what has come to you of the truth. >>>TO EACH OF YOU WE PRESCRIBED A LAW AND A METHODone nation>differ qualified On the day of judgement God will ''NOT'' judge humanity bases on Sunni Muslim sect VS Shia Muslim sect ''NOR'' by Muslim VS non-Muslim >but '' YOUR " birth in the Muslim's family is NOT a > qualification '' YOUR " religion / sect / foot long beard is NOT a > qualification The > qualification Faith in God and Good Work

@perniciousseizurehellio3438

2 жыл бұрын

Based jazakallahkhair

Bahmani Sultanate please

Nice, keep it up. But I believe aurangzeb and peshwa bajirao are same when compared with behavior. In short they were lunatics.

Shahjahan killed 36 of his relatives who could claim throne. Including khusrow who was imprisoned blinded by his own father jahangir

@user-dz4pb2ll3k

6 ай бұрын

so what? you guys say the same thing about Aurangzeb

10:26

Hi

Shah Jahan Facts: * Mumtaz was Shah Jahan's 4th wife out of his 7 wives. * Shah Jahan killed Mumtaz's husband before he forced her into sexual slavery labelled as marriage. * Mumtaz died during her 14th child delivery. * After Mumtaz's death, Shah Jahan married Mumtaza's sister.

Shah jahan was more rajput then mughal.

@sourovgangguli7235

2 жыл бұрын

so that he was Brown. But clan is judge by fatherside

5:20 NO. This did not happen all over India. Hindu kings of old never destroyed temples to delegitimise their foes. Destroying temples meant that they would instantly forfeit their status as a Dharma Sevak. There is a reason why Hindus committed Jauhar only when fighting against mlecchas and not other Hindus. Stop fabricating nonsense!

@tahahussain5708

2 жыл бұрын

.

@crimsoncloak6564

2 жыл бұрын

Except you are wrong. It happened all the times, all over India. The temples were destroyed, but a few idols were carried over to their kingdom to retain status as Dhrmasevak.

@stormshadow5283

2 жыл бұрын

@@crimsoncloak6564 there is a difference between carrying away an idol to be worshipped and destroying temples outright. Stop fabricating lies outta your rear end.

@alpaciandecatre4385

2 жыл бұрын

@@stormshadow5283 But the Brahmanists did destroy Buddhists shrines and Jain sites to emphasize their dominantion. But when they became rulers then patronized. Aurangzeb did destroy temples for religious reasons. But I don't think other Mughal ruler except babar did it for the same... But nonetheless, history is an amazing thing to study but should view from the appropriate time frame, not from modern lenses. U can choose to only look at one side, but unless u r a trained historian, chances are u r not qualified to make such conclusions. Otherwise point to sources from qualified historians.

@stormshadow5283

2 жыл бұрын

@@alpaciandecatre4385 did I ask the opinion of a mleccha regarding the history of my people?

And when the Mughals fell after Aurangzeb, the Marathas and Hyderabad rose to powers!

Can't wait alamgir

Most cgildren will now know the Taj Mahal through Lego and Minecraft, have fun and Enjoy, Coca-Cola.

John 3:16-21 16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. 17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. 18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. 19 And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. 20 For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved. 21 But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God. Jesus saves

@aasifazimabadi786

2 жыл бұрын

And then God sent the Paraclete. His name is Muhammad Ibn Abdullah (peace be upon him). We invite you to Islam, Christopher. Peace be upon Jesus of Nazareth. Ameen.

@aasifazimabadi786

2 жыл бұрын

@@anonymousperson9 To beget means to have a child. In their interpretation of the immaculate conception, Christians believe that God is actually the father of Jesus, so he is a begotten son.

Bro please make a video on Aurangazeb

5:24 which Sanatani kings Marathas The Merwari Rajputs They never Destroyed temples It was Forvinned by Dharma

Shah Jahan cut off hands of the workers who built Taj Mahal 😰😰

@avineshsidhu2850

2 жыл бұрын

thats a myth

@dharmapersona2084

2 жыл бұрын

@@avineshsidhu2850 dont deny history, avinesh! 😱

@magma9000

2 жыл бұрын

Fake news

@syedashfaqahmed1985

2 жыл бұрын

@@dharmapersona2084 no man seriously that is a myth

@anirudh177

2 жыл бұрын

@@dharmapersona2084 It actually isn't true, He didn't cut off the hands man. Wait a sec, lemme find the sources and references, and I'll send it to you.

Im waiting for what u write about aurangzeb and what parts u include..!!!

भाई अगर इतना जानते हो तो यह भी बताओ कि शाहजहाँ के दिल्ली जीतने पर वह राजा किस कुटिया में रहता था? और अपना देश छोड़ के भारत में क्यों इतना आलीशान ताजमहल बनवाया।