- Play War Thunder for FREE! Support my channel and get a premium aircraft, tank or ship and a three day account upgrade as a BONUS: gjn.link/RedEffectWarThunder Also available for free on PlayStation®4 and Xbox One.

3 жыл бұрын

I haven't found a professional review of it yet.

@rudomikazuki8301

3 жыл бұрын

@ sadly, most of the infor about NK tanks are classifiled, or no one really into research

3 жыл бұрын

@@rudomikazuki8301 yup, but red is really good at "visual research". That plus the little info that we have can give you a relatively good view on things. He already did this on nk's older tank.

@igortomovic8966

3 жыл бұрын

What you thin about new Serbian M-84AS1 an AS2, they was shown on a military exercise "Sadejstvo 2020".

@user-oi8nm1sy1d

3 жыл бұрын

You just started a war with this vedio

This man's being one of the larger warthunder KZreadrs without playing warthunder

@NotNicot

3 жыл бұрын

He probably plays it, but doesn't make videos about it

@screamingenderhawk8739

3 жыл бұрын

@@NotNicot I'd like to see him play some in that case

@FrantisekPicifuk

3 жыл бұрын

@Shoudday Cha They are in it for the money.. and that is completley fine by me.

@egonieser

3 жыл бұрын

He doesn't have to actively use the product, the product is related to the content he creates and that's the target demographic as all people watching it are tank fans so a tank/armoured warfare game ad is just appropriate. Or would you much rather prefer Raid Shadow Legends lol? It's actually thanks to RedEffect i'm now a War Thunder veteran, never regretted the decision to try it and now I have 5 nations maxed.

@petermuller3995

3 жыл бұрын

@Shoudday Cha Everyone is in for the money, despite the players.

Now letting our personal preferences aside and biases and fanboisms, as a wise man once said, there is not best tank, or those tanks are better than those tanks, because tanks do not exist in a vacuum, a 1 vs 1 duel on a flat plain. There are so many complex issues about tanks and bringing them to the field, long before the design of a tank is even finished. Price tag, the doctrine of the military that uses the tank, terrain, what a military needs from a tank, all come into play. Tanks have strenght and weaknesses relative to one another and to the things I mentioned. That rambling aside, the Bob Semple is the best tank. Damn, quite a few likes, thanks guys !

@exurgemars

3 жыл бұрын

Bob Semple vs MBT Arjun. Epic Tank Battles of History.

@MarkVrem

3 жыл бұрын

Well there does come a point, where if a group of tanks makes it through Helicopter and Tank Destroyer defenses, that it will have to be intercepted by other tanks. So at some point, one side or the other will breakthrough probably under cover of tactical air superiority or air equality (where air assets are too busy dealing with each other) and have to be engaged into what would be characterized as a pivotal massive tank battle lol. Tank destroyers are nice and all, but they're a bit like ancient light cavalry, great for hit and run, but can't really make a stand holding territory.

@raulkiss9124

3 жыл бұрын

Bob Semple > modern MBTs

@Vlad_-_-_

3 жыл бұрын

@@MarkVrem There is no such thing as tank destroyers nowadays. Heavy, medium, light tanks, tank destroyers all are replaced by the MBT, simply because it can do all those things.

@francesboy2

3 жыл бұрын

@@Vlad_-_-_ The JGSDF Type-16, Centauro II, Sprut-SD and Stryker MGS would like to have a word.

So basically Russia wants a lot of things for their tanks and will cancel most if it by 2025.

@altoclan21

3 жыл бұрын

Moscow politician = stronk

@spartanx9293

3 жыл бұрын

How are the generals supposed to afford their new summer homes

@plasot

3 жыл бұрын

Rhinmetall already showed 130 mm gun, I bet we will see Leos with that gun than russian tanks with at least half of mentioned upgrades

@spartanx9293

3 жыл бұрын

@@plasot Challenger and Abrams are probably going to use it too

@TheArklyte

3 жыл бұрын

@@spartanx9293 neither of them had even switched to L/55 in past decade, lol. Brits simply don't care, US is more focused on improving anti -civilian- infantry capabilities of their tanks which was the sole focus of upgrades for last 2 decades. Plus UK still has rifled 120mm gun. Should I remind you how they have gotten L7 from 20 pounder or how soviets got 115mm gun of T-62 out of 100mm gun?;) UK can create 130-140 mm gun and put it into service faster then anybody else. Just rebore them and after next 200-500 shots in training(depending how the guns were used to that point) replace them with newly produced ones. *Problem is not in making bigger gun, problem is in losing ammunition compatibility and making ammo storage smaller.* _But brits have neither problem as they neither use NATO ammo due to rifling, nor does reboring increase the length of case._

"Russian Tanks Are Better Than NATO Tanks" Video preview is war thunder Is this some kind of meta meme or something

@crankthetank3581

3 жыл бұрын

Russian bias reeeeeeeee

@skwizzzb3904

3 жыл бұрын

a t-34 can wrestle 3 tanks all at the same time and still win

@AmericanIdiot7659

3 жыл бұрын

@@skwizzzb3904 t-34 can easily be shot in the underbelly with m61 and the sides too the kv-1 in the turret ring kv-2 on the turret? Even the m4a1 sherman can pen t34 - 57 if you're lucky enough

@AHappyCub

3 жыл бұрын

@@AmericanIdiot7659 new volumetric armor fucked that up mate, russian tanks are even more bullshit rn

@skwizzzb3904

3 жыл бұрын

@@AmericanIdiot7659 im a german user and matchmaking always pair russian-german and a pinch of allied tanks

"Nyet T-72STDHIV is fine" - Russian government

@andrelunkes1038

3 жыл бұрын

Bruh but Abrams SEPV29472847 and Leopard2A25 are far batter.

@maxdiak5954

3 жыл бұрын

@@andrelunkes1038 don't you Mean the leo2 A420 and the abrams SEPV69

@andrelunkes1038

3 жыл бұрын

@@maxdiak5954 It's a joke

@cheese5331

3 жыл бұрын

@@andrelunkes1038 that is a joke

@dimasakbar7668

3 жыл бұрын

@@andrelunkes1038 i guess the STDHIV doesnt ring a bell to you huh. Lemme help "T-72 STD HIV", how bout now?

Russian ministry of defense: "Lets upgrade our tank fleet" Russian economy: "Not happening anytime soon lmfao"

@MonMalthias

3 жыл бұрын

With nukes there's no reason for Russia to need to spend that much money on modernisation. If you look at the order numbers and contracts, this is more about the maintenance of a vital strategic industry with make-work instead of giving a substantive upgrade. There's no way that Russia can further their interests with so few tanks on order, but that's because there's no need to: that big red button is the _ultima regio regum._ So it's more about keeping the skilled engineers and scientists in a job than about actually making the Russian ground forces into anything resembling capable. I actually think that something similar is happening with the M1A3 program and the Leopard 2A7 programs. The prospect of full scale ground war is basically zero. At most, a tank company element _might_ be dispatched to a proxy war location. No brigades, no divisions. Those days are over. It's all about aerospace now.

@darthimperius8057

3 жыл бұрын

@@MonMalthias using nukes is kinda gay way to advance your political interests, Israel has them but they never threatened to use them against their enemies, they prefer dealing with them in a conventional warfare

@Chiboza

3 жыл бұрын

@@darthimperius8057 not really in conventional, more with subversion, us help and asymmetric response

@whatdoyoumean9084

3 жыл бұрын

@@darthimperius8057, well Russia is playing smart because of the fact that they're taking all of the advantages available to them.

@darthimperius8057

3 жыл бұрын

@Mstislaw AA Arabs are great fighters, they are the lions, lions that are unfortunately led by sheep

Hmmm, I can already tell the comments will be a salt mine

@duyhung2528

3 жыл бұрын

salt are essential.

@Muscovy7

3 жыл бұрын

@@duyhung2528 yes it is, brother

@90enemies

3 жыл бұрын

Down here, Salt is a way of life

@Muscovy7

3 жыл бұрын

@@90enemies basically

@AdamJRowen

3 жыл бұрын

Salt Mine 😂

The Soviets where clearly ahead in Armour technology until the late 80's. There is a reason the US Army refused to take the M1 Abrams into battle with it's 105mm gun and instead waited for enough M1A1 Abrams tanks with the 120mm gun to be delivered. The Leopard 2 had a gun on par or better than the Soviet 125mm gun in the whole 80's but it's armour was not as good. The M1 Abrams had better armour but used a 105mm gun that could not reliably penetrate the T-72B even with modern ammunition. With the M1A1 the Abrams combined the German firepower with their own armour and with the early 90's Leopard 2A5 the Germans upgraded the armour of the Leopard. At this point in the early 90's Western tanks was unquestionably ahead of Russian/Soviet tanks, especially if one takes in the compartmentalized ammo storage and Thermal imager. The Thermal imager had come with the Leopard 2 and Abrams when they entered service, but this is Europe and a thermal imager while amazing is not a game changer in Europe as much as it was in the desert. Also only the gunners had Thermal imagers at that time.

@sloptek1807

3 жыл бұрын

True, but keep in mind that after Gorbachev came to power (1985) Soviet economy started decreasing dramatically, which meant that spending on Military, especially on developing new weapons of all sorts, including armor, were seriously cut. I mean Soviets had so many interesting projects, like obj. 195, which were abandoned after the fall of USSR. I'm pretty sure if it hadn't happened, Soviets still would've been leaders.

Trophy System on Leopard 2? Arent the Germans developing their own APS?

@RedEffectChannel

3 жыл бұрын

They are, but until its fully developed they will be using Trophy in the meantime.

@lt_cycloperstrike199

3 жыл бұрын

Siddesh Gannu US also have their own but i didn’t know they will developed together but maybe, because US also pick Trophy because maybe they will deploy their own after fully developed

@crabbyjungle5670

3 жыл бұрын

Trophy is only on 17 leo2s for VHRJTF rest will get Rheinmetall ADS in near future

@JjjCDsjsjshs

3 жыл бұрын

@@crabbyjungle5670 can you send me a link to the source? I would like to read more

@hazardous458

3 жыл бұрын

@the baron Rheinmetall aps still hasn’t finished. But currently, trophy is so far best.

redeffect: T90 might become obsolete by 2025. Indian sycophant: I knwe we shouldn't have bought T90s. BUILD MORE ARJUNK! redeffect: But that's even wor... Indian sycophant: *SILENCE* or i'll repair your Windows and ask you for your bank account personal details.

@91plm

3 жыл бұрын

@Dev Narayan S.S i don't check out the history trash bin sorry.

@BobbyB1928

3 жыл бұрын

Indian 120mm rifled apfsds is relatively weak compared to 125mm Russian that the t-90 and t-72bms that India currently uses as well. The rifled apfsds can only penetrate somewhere in the 300smm vs rha vs Indian mango apfsds (from old soviet stocks) that can penetrate 450 not to mention the also Russian supplied Refleks atgm which can penetrate 800mm vs rha. Future plans to replace these 120mm rifled with a smoothbore that can fire atgms sound good on paper untill you realize that these will cause even more logistical problems as well. The era on the t-90s and 72BMs that India uses should be replaced with Kaktus. Kontak-5 is long obsolete. Thus, it would be better if the Arjuin were replaced with more T-90s. This as well as aquiring Russian depleted uranium apfsds for the 72BMs and 90s would allow India to have a better competitive edge against Chinese ztz-97/99s.

@gamecubekingdevon3

3 жыл бұрын

@Dev Narayan S.S it doesn't change the fact that arjun MK1A still has a lot of design flaws. (and indian gov is perfectly aware of it: they have the licenses to locally build T-72M1 + they have purchased lots of russian T-90 ) making a new design from scratch is hard, and sometimes it fails. it happened even to countries wich a huge budget. there's no shame in recognising that arjun is not a good design. now it's time to moove on, get more foreign equipment that is prooved to be reliable, get more licenses to build locally equipment, and use thoose equipment + technologies as a basis from wich to evolve. (like south korea did with it's MBTs ---> first they based themselves on american tech, and then, they used it as a basis from wich they evolved to make their own thing)

@hprpa

3 жыл бұрын

Seriously? One video of RedEffect did this. Please check Arjun MK1A. It is a very good Improvement, don't simply go around doing this crap.

@hprpa

3 жыл бұрын

@J L tf where are you from

*sees war thunder sponsor* *Immediately skips 40 seconds"

@bolshevik1017

3 жыл бұрын

Because you already play the game?

imagine looking back and realising it was just hype

@Insert-Retarded-Reply-Here

Жыл бұрын

It was not just hype. The T-90M is an extremely good tank, so far there hasn’t been a single T-90M destroyed by Ukrainian fire. The T-80BVM although has its problems has performed quite well considering that it’s a modernization of a pretty obselete tank. The recent video posted by redeffect on a T-80BVM fighting (and destroying) a Ukrainian T-64 illustrates that pretty well. You could say that it was hyped up a lot (which I don’t disagree with) but it would be incorrect to say it is a bad tank

@maitreytelang2312

Жыл бұрын

@@Insert-Retarded-Reply-HereQuite honestly, apart from the T-90M, T-90S and T-90MS, no other Russian tanks performed even moderately in Ukraine. Just accept the truth.

@Insert-Retarded-Reply-Here

Жыл бұрын

@@maitreytelang2312 T-80s have wrecked Ukrainian armor. I wouldn’t be so sure if i were you

@maitreytelang2312

Жыл бұрын

@@Insert-Retarded-Reply-Here Those Ukrainian Tanks are T-64s and it’s variants.

@Insert-Retarded-Reply-Here

Жыл бұрын

@@maitreytelang2312 so? The Russian T-80s still have been effective, even with poor tactics and logistics facing off very experienced Ukrainians.

This video sure did not age well.

@alexusmc2384

2 жыл бұрын

Well.we haven't seen Russian tanks fighting western ones maybe a couple years or so

Russia: *plans for comprehensive upgrades to their tank fleet to keep them competitive in modern warfare* Russian Economy: "Oh, honey....no."

Congratulations, You have started a war

War Thunder : *How many sponsors do you want* ? RedEffect : *YES*

This didn't age well.

@ChobeVelyasha

2 ай бұрын

I sont know how that didnt aged well.Both Russian and west tanks losing in high speed,but there more soviet tanks then west tanks so yeah T-series tanks suffer higher cadualties

@salamander4668

18 күн бұрын

It aged perfectly, lmao

@salamander4668

18 күн бұрын

​@@ChobeVelyashathere is much more T-90Ms in ukraine than abramses and leo2s combined, yet russia never lost 10 of them in less than a month. Yet, this is exactly what happened with abramses.

They will never beat the bob semple tank

@whydoihave16subs65

3 жыл бұрын

Nobody beats the Bob semple...

@captainnutt2995

3 жыл бұрын

MIAS mini tank: are you challenge me?!

Someone disliked the video literally less than 10 seconds after it appeared. Haters gonna hate. :(

@m1a1abrams3

3 жыл бұрын

its beta defense and his arjun pride. amirite wonka?

@VladislavDrac

3 жыл бұрын

Abraham bois be hating when they saw the title

@usaisthebestiockdownpoiice816

3 жыл бұрын

Russian tanks are horrible. Why wouldn't we auto dislike? Also look at the T-14. Russia has less than 10. LOOOOOL

@ethan5354

3 жыл бұрын

it’s probably the American NPC who saw the thumbnail and disliked without even watching the video.

@6p699

3 жыл бұрын

@@usaisthebestiockdownpoiice816 NPC detected....... the content of the video is different then the title. He did something similar before with the title NATO tanks are better then Russian ones.

5:38 Finally we got an actual picture of you 😎

I just want to see T-80U/UD with relickt, even malachite, CITV and 2A46M5 guns. That would make them very good imo

@lukabogdanovic4658

3 жыл бұрын

T80U is getting replace by t14's

@einar8019

3 жыл бұрын

ah yes beacause russia needs another top tier mbt, looks at everybody else with 1 top tier and russia with 2 top tier mbts already

@Brother_Nihilus

3 жыл бұрын

@@einar8019 dude. Not EVERYTHING is a WarThunder reference. Grow up. I play WarThunder as well but I'm not so salty

This didn't age well. 😂

As far as I know Germany will only use the Trophy, till the Rheinmetall ADS (Active Defense System) is 100% ready. As far as development goes, it can defeat any anti tank projectile fired from a minimum distance of 5 meters.

@Muscovy7

3 жыл бұрын

ADS sucks though, the US completely dismissed it for Trophy. Lmao

@Sturmv0gel

3 жыл бұрын

@@Muscovy7 I'm not sure if we are talking about the same thing.

@JjjCDsjsjshs

3 жыл бұрын

@@Muscovy7 usa was impressed and confirmed a 97% success rate. Problem is that its more complicated to install on tanks and not tested in combat. Price is probably another problem.

@liljackass6998

3 жыл бұрын

As an israeli i gotta say, the rheinmetal ADS looks great, trophy needs 50 m while rheinmetal needs only 5 and lower radar signature BUT and heres a big but rheinmetal is sacrificing its radar signature, for protection from top attack, i think thats a huge disadvantage the tanks is now vulnerable to top attack ATGM's like spike and javelin, or literally any guided munition from a drone or plane or helicopter, leaving it only capable of defending from rpgs or kornets/konkurs perhaps germany is only realistically facing russia as a threat, and russia doesnt have spikes or javelins? in which case the rheinmetal ADS would be good for it but imo, theres a big hole in the armor with rheinmetal ADS

@JjjCDsjsjshs

3 жыл бұрын

@@liljackass6998 a couple of months ago I read that they fixed this gap. It was stated that they can defend against rooftop attack. Author was Rheinmetall I think but I need to recheck that.

another video on russian tanks that didn't age well

I disagree! You see, NATO have this tank called Bob Semple if the russian armored forces were to try to fight againts one of these beast we all know the result would end in total defeat of the russians.

@overwatchelite4083

3 жыл бұрын

Objection! Everyone knows the tsar tank is the best tank that is on par with the bob semple tank and is capable of destroying it! NATO upon seeing it would immidiatly call a full retreat!

By the time the Armata is in active duty, the Leopard might already he using the new 130mm gun.

Russian tanks: Please give me money for upgrades Western tanks: Please give me oil from middle east North korean tanks: Please notice me world

Well... it didn't age quite well... All the t-90s are burning down, blowing up, not because of NATO tanks, but because of some funny boi with funny tubes on their shoulders.

@Insert-Retarded-Reply-Here

Жыл бұрын

No, that is undoubtedly incorrect. The ONLY T-90M completely destroyed was immobilized/disabled by a Carl Gustav. Left stranded with no way to recover the video, a Russian T-72 scuttled the vehicle with a shot to the rear after the crew bailed out. All this is evident in the footage of its destruction

I think the title was sarcastic.

@markv1158

3 жыл бұрын

Same still not sure

You have got to be kidding, T-72 tinder box is not superior, nothing on the ground for RF is...

your title had me in the first half not gona lie

I feel like I may have been clickbaited

Video of new North Korean tank when?

@qayz0989

3 жыл бұрын

He already did.

@Kalashnikov413

3 жыл бұрын

@@qayz0989 he mean the newest one

@jackie520

3 жыл бұрын

I think it's just a replica to show off.

@kengokaslana1776cw

3 жыл бұрын

@@jackie520 I saw the gun barrel wobble a bit to either its a cardboard cover or they modify their T-62s and in the process messed up the gun's stabilizer

@younissumaling8744

3 жыл бұрын

@@kengokaslana1776cw no they bought chinese type 96 and added a composite steel with active protection system

Well, after the gulfwars and the high lossrate now, I think that keeping your ammo in the same spot as the crew is a MAJOR designflaw. Would you agree mr. Red Effect? (I am no troll or so, it's an honest question, and I value your take on this a lot sir)

@Insert-Retarded-Reply-Here

Жыл бұрын

Yes, but Russia has very limited options as all Russian T series MBTs were never centered on protection for the crew. Changing it to a NATO blast door style ammo storage would essentially be creating a completely different tank, further straining the weak Russian logistics. With the T-90M being produced in greater numbers and the armata project looking murky, I think Russia has opted to protect the autoloader with armor around the ammunition and line the inside with spall liners

@salamander4668

18 күн бұрын

My man, if you think that nato tabk won't obliterate it's crew, if he anno gonna explode - you are very wrong

@salamander4668

18 күн бұрын

​@@Insert-Retarded-Reply-Herecrew in russian tanks are more protected though. What are you talking about?

all i here is “oh x is coming in 202x” Can we get trough 2020 first?

Ooooo new RedEffect video. What a way to have fun before reviewing for my exams :3

Could you make a video on the different mechanisms that affect tank maneuverability like transmissions, suspensions, tracks, steering wheels, tillers, etc.

*YES RED I KNOW!!* BUT DO YOU LIKE BANANAS!?!?!? just *ANSWER* it! >:(

@TheMadVulpen

3 жыл бұрын

Me when the

@duffy6542

3 жыл бұрын

no not really, I like oranges

@faatihh1130

3 жыл бұрын

I am gonna

@sayasakisaka7609

3 жыл бұрын

lmao

@datbeast109

3 жыл бұрын

@@TheMadVulpen hey, why are you here xd

Hopefully, the nameless T-72 (as RedEffect called it in one of his vids), from tank Biathlon, shall become a T-72B3M or T-72B4, with a commander's independent thermal sights.

Could there be issues of political patronage? I have heard stories about how tank production choice was sometimes influenced by things like that in previous times.

@namesurname624

3 жыл бұрын

Probably, its kinda a monopoly in Russia

@moonbear2130

3 жыл бұрын

Yes he mentioned that in a previous video that they are upgrading their worse t-80s bc of political reasons

But, can it defeat Bob Semple?

@einar8019

3 жыл бұрын

never

I love all those people who say you are biased for Russian tanks

@AmericanIdiot7659

3 жыл бұрын

I used to be one of those people lmao.

@albar428

3 жыл бұрын

@@AmericanIdiot7659 Same, but I started watching more videos and realized, hw is critical of every single tank out there.

@randomuser5443

3 жыл бұрын

Never thought that way. I thought he had biases to certain systems like gas turbine which reduces his respect for the Abrams, but not a full Russian bias

@ernstbusch179

3 жыл бұрын

@@randomuser5443 it is something many tend to critisise about him, it isn't true though

@MrNebelschatten

3 жыл бұрын

I just criticise him for never properly accounting for targeting computers and other such tech which makes the real difference between 2. And 1. world tanks.

I really enjoy your work, keep up the effort😊

What'ts the song used in the video? It has a very catchy bass line

Thanks for the information

so if the t72b3ubh gets turret relict will it also feature the era in the game ?

5:40 dat sneaky Mike O'Tren shot.

Thanks for the video

Not uh, better than NATO ATGM's though. Even with cope cages.

So we are ignoring the fact that equipement is only as good as its operator? Like not gonna lie, t-90's are a threat but your average american tank battalion with M1A2 SEP3s are already using aps systems. Plus training plays a MASSIVE difference while russia trains tanks as their own force the real difference is the integrated training from Nato countries. After all, germany invented mechanized tactics but America perfected it. Your T-90M doesnt stand a chance against any type of support artillery or airpower. And yes the same could be said about the Abrams. But heres the thing about the US. We Dont go ANYWHERE without airpower or artillery. We dont deploy tanks unsupported. And ALL of this hinges on russia even being Able to purchase all these upgrades. More than half that will be cancelled by 2023.

DM73 and M829A4 are very rare. DM63 and M829A3 are also relatively uncommon.

Could I see a footage of you playing war thunder? What is your main tech tree???

Hi, do you plan to cover mobile anti-air vehicles like the Tunguska or else ? This would be interesting.

@metalmadsen

2 жыл бұрын

It would

T-90m is better than western tanks, becose T-90m have exelent heat protection, have better fire control system, its lighter, can go 5 meters deep under water, can fire tandem ATGM, and have covered ammo and inside the tank is fire and schrapnel proof.

@ramirezyoutubeyt2373

3 жыл бұрын

Bruh M1a2 Sepv4 has better Firepower more thicker Armor And More And Better Frontal Armor and better Optics Btw Russia is Just Stupid

That's what Red looks like in real life when editing a video? Gotta hit the gym.

The Russian tank look like they are limited by the length of their penetrator because of the carousel, maybe the Ukrainian prototype with the rear turret autoloader would be a good idea to have longer apfsds and to renew the whole serie. That would also leave space under the turret, maybe put the crew lower so he is even safer in the hull.

however, one thing that must be taken into account: cost. (aka, what is the cost of thoose russian upgrades vs the cost of western upgrades). remember that brute performance and maximum potential and all are nice, but the cost, how much of it could be done reliably in a given period of time, reliability, ease to maintenance, etc... are also important.

Even if Russian tanks are brought up to western standards (sure they exceed in some ways), the lack of manufacturing capacity and the lack of funds for upkeep would be hugely detrimental in a conflict. Even their "low cost" compared to western tanks, is too high for Russia to pursue large acquisition of the better tanks. The disparity on the field would be huge.

@6p699

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah they really should just downsize the tank numbers as they are unnecessarily large for modern combat and budget. Use the funds for T14 project as recent conflicts show more mobile tactically efficient units are just more favorable. The days are gone for mass open ground tank assaults.

@yubisnake

3 жыл бұрын

@@militaryanalysis5028 while that may be true, a few hundred "modern" tanks vs a few thousand is still a large disparity. One thing they do have going for them is compatibility in parts. Something the west lacks due to individual tank development

Hey in your armata video you said even if the shell doesnt make it through it will still disable the gun. Can you explain this?

@RedEffectChannel

3 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/hmusr5qoidC4qcY.html Ive only mentioned that in that video because Ive already made a video explaining that in detail :)

@Kalashnikov413

3 жыл бұрын

@@ferid9k the point is that although the Shell didn't penetrated the gun mantlet, it Will still damaged and potentially destroyed the barrel, making the gun unuseable

@ferid9k

3 жыл бұрын

Ok i got it

@Maverick-gg2do

3 жыл бұрын

The shock damage from a hit that close to the gun can still damage and jam the mechanisms. And "splash" from the impact can potentially damage the gun barrel as well. For example, a hit might not penetrate the armor but it may have buckled and warped it enough to prevent the gun from elevating. Alternatively a hit could strike the gun mantel and the force could sheer the bolts and joints locking the gun in place and rendering it unsafe to fire.

@Kalashnikov413

3 жыл бұрын

@@Maverick-gg2do yes, exactly

Can you give your thoughts on the tata kestrel?

So to sum this up : T-90M will get Arena-M , T-14 ERA for the front , and rigid ERA for the side of the hull ( 4S24 blocks i guess ... ) . T-72B3UBH will get Arena-M , Relikt ERA for the front and rigid ERA for the side of the hull . T-80BVM will get Arena-M and rigid ERA for the side of the hull . Now as much as those changes make sense for T-90M and will allow it to remain competitif in the short term , i honestly don't understand why Russian MOD is not cutting off any further expens towards T-72 and T-80 and rederect those fundings towards T-14 . No matter how much ready for mass-production T-14 is it will still be miles ahead of any actual of future ( short term ) western developpment soo .....

@zenko247

Жыл бұрын

NO it didn't FOOL feel like a dickhead yet

"rUsSiAn TaNkS aRe BeTtEr" 😂😂😂

Red post some videos with you playing WT with T72B3, M1A2, LEO 2a5 ...

How dangerous is APS for infantry support? How do they deal with this?

@JjjCDsjsjshs

3 жыл бұрын

Depends on the aps. It can kill infantry within a couple metres. Only german aps is "safe" up to 2m next to the tank.

@lukasgruber1280

3 жыл бұрын

@@JjjCDsjsjshs thank you!

No. Just no.

F for the Russian Economy in 2025 i guess...

I've been thinking lately it really does not matter who has the best.... because what really matters is Air Force if one side gains air superiority, well no tank stands a chance against 100's of apaches and A10's or even AC-130s.... Fish in a barrel

Ibris K, something you might want to look into.

The title works.

The only reason I’d be happy about enemy tank development is to encourage competition and allied tank development

Arena sistem can be put any any russian tank" Can i put it on my T-34

What about the ammo rack being exposed still besides on the T14 Armarta

@overwatchelite4083

3 жыл бұрын

I think the T90M had a improved and protected ammo carousel

doesnt the T-72B3 mod. 2016 have 4S23 ERA tiles on its frontal armor?

@einar8019

3 жыл бұрын

it has relikt on side and kontakt 5 on the front

@comrade607

3 жыл бұрын

@@einar8019 I think instead of 4s22 it has 4s23

@zenko247

Жыл бұрын

Made no difference at all in Ukraine they went BANG just as easily 🤣🤣🤣

The why you say Ukrainian makes me laugh. You definitely don’t like them

It would be amazing to see something about the new north korean tank, and what you think about it from first looks and the info we have so far

good video as usual

T72b3 and t80bvm do have excellent firepower though

Every modern Rossian tonk are gangsta until the clouds start speaking "freedumb and democrazy"

@newspaperbin6763

3 жыл бұрын

Snow*

@captainnutt2995

3 жыл бұрын

Every US jet fighter are gangsters until ground and cloud speaking “Flanker, Felon and Triumf, Prometey”

@FunkyEspelhoCat

3 жыл бұрын

@@captainnutt2995 ok putin

@Killdozer-do4mc

3 жыл бұрын

every american pilot is gangster until they run into sophisticated air defence network and coordinated airforce

@LTUGang

3 жыл бұрын

@@Killdozer-do4mc sakai ruskiu analo govnet geriau? kzread.info/dash/bejne/ZKmcltuGcduYhaQ.html

Tanks are nothing but targets without air superiority.

@crabbyjungle5670

3 жыл бұрын

Go away air drone atgm tank trash man.

@circleofsorrow4583

3 жыл бұрын

@@militaryanalysis5028 yeah, that's why the US won in Vietnam/Iraq/Afghanistan so easily. Oh wait...

6:04 Where do the beads go?

How even the crew wears a mask. I like that :D

i have a question do tanks have air condition inside?

@dapperfield595

3 жыл бұрын

Challenger 2s even have boilers for tea and MREs

@overwatchelite4083

3 жыл бұрын

That's nice

If T-72b find first m1a2 sepv3 and shoot first, (m1a2 sepv3 have same hull as first m1 abrams and have big weak spot under turret and) T-72b will at 70% penetrate abrams and tank will blow up, crew will be shocked, dead of wounded, and T-72b will shoot again and again... but same it is if m1a2 sepv3 will shoot first at T-72b.

@jaroslavdudas7227

3 жыл бұрын

@@Gridlocked its almoust same but m1a2 sepv3 have some added plates on it.

@jaroslavdudas7227

3 жыл бұрын

@@Gridlocked you can believe if you want, but its same.

me and the boys heading to nizhny tagil

5:40 is that you?

Me who already suffers through the grind of war thunders mid tier towards is 4m and t72a and owns no silver

I think the russian ejection turret systems is the finest in the world.. As you can see by the many battles of Russian Tanks vs Western tanks , the Russian turrets ejects an travels 50~60 yards away from the its Hull, allowing the crew to escape .. Brilliant..

You have to understand that enormous amounts of tanks in Russian arsenal would take time and lots of money, manpower to upgrade. Neither Unites States nor Germany have so many tanks. At the same time Russians want to have their military budget under control unlike US that is spending more than it can earn and is in an astronomic debt. Im not surprised by the decisions they are making. They are reacting to Western developments. Their doctrine is to stay on pair not to lead... However i do believe that Russian way of simple yet rugged solutions = efficient way of solving a problem is deeply embedded in their way of facing threats since WW2. For example Russians know their old T-72s are no longer on pair with modern Western tanks right? So what do they do with thousands of such tanks in their stockpiles? Would you put a crew inside such a tank and send them to battlefield with you AND them knowing fully well that they don't stand a chance? No... Would you scrap such tank when it would cost additional time, money and manpower? No such tank could still knock out even modern Abrams of Leopard in specific situations. So what do you do? Russian thinking: Lets robotize them cheaply. That way you can field hundreds of inexpensive but still sufficiently dangerous tanks without danger to human crews. Saturate enemy tank formations, break to their rear or flank them. In world war 2 it has been proven that even a quality German tanks and their crews ca be defeated by sufficient numbers of cheaper, easy to produce tanks that are sufficiently capable to do damage. In my view today pure Tank vs Tank battles are a thing of the past. In a serious war with a peer adversary it is a combined operation of many branched of armed forces of each adversary and how well can they coordinate among themselves that wins the war. Tank forces are just one element - even the venerable Abrams is useless when crew does not know where to go or where is the enemy. Mi-35 formation would turn those tanks into old rust. See my point? So this video lacks the description of environments these Russian tanks would be used in. Usually a very hard to cross terrain with extreme temperatures? Be that desert or Siberian taiga of east europe plains? All known places where heavy armored vehicles had problems to cross while Russian tank designs did not... Germans learned that the hard way in WW2, Americans learned that in Desert Storm. You see tank is not only about the thickness of its armor and power of its main gun. Its about mobility, how far can he go, how fast, what terrains can he pass, what is the mean time between failures of the engine, how many gun shots the main gun is rated for before it needs to be replaced, does he have a auto-loader - how reliable this auto-loader is, how fast can it shoot? All these overall characteristics make a tank. West lags in many of those aspects and western tank formations needs more maintenance and logistics than Russian ones. in plain terms: Don't judge a book only by its cover. So to sum it up: Tank warfare one on one is a thing of the past. If (god forbid) a war with Russia would broke out... western tank formations would be saturated with cheap, and disposable robotic T-72s (provided Russians would have manufactured enough robotic kits to convert them) that would have many casualties but at the same time would wreak havoc to American / German tank battalions.

could you make a video about the new north korean tank that looks like abrams/armata..

This video is based on propaganda. Most of leopard2 tanks are a4 variant and most of m1 are a2. If someone thinks that NATO can equip all of his tanks on the most modern standard and with most modern projectiles in large numbers then...

So in other words Russia is giving up on the T-14 Armata to focus on upgrading the T-90?

@zenko247

Жыл бұрын

and both fucked by the Ukrainians😂😂😂🙂

Yeah...this was answered back in 91.

1.T-80B's turret armor only has 50-80mm less protection than T-80U also there are far more T-80B tanks in Russian service than T-80U's so upgrading the T-80U would be pointless also with Relikt ERA it would have protection exceeding T-90A.....not bad for a REAR echelon tank 2. While Both T-72B3M and T-80BVM don't have CITV the commander still can see in thermal however his thermal imager is slaved to the gunners. However this isn't much of an issue because in Soviet/Russian tank doctrine the Commander usually finds the target and lays the gunner on target to ease the gunners job so he can make his final lay. 3. Trophy is only being equipped to certain M1A2C's that are deployed to Europe it's not going to be standard issue for all M1A2C's and as it stand there isnt any Leopard2a7's with Throphy installed.

@nemisous83

3 жыл бұрын

@@Gridlocked trophy is a foreign system unless they could secure domestic production its unlikely they would standardize on it it's far more likely they develop their own APS.

War thunder and realistic physics? You need to visit this game again and see what is going on with tracks and shells

You say that T-80bvm and T-72b3m UBH have same base armor as old T-80b and T-72b but most modern M1A2 sepv3 have same hull as first m1 abrams model. Than Russia use kontakt-5 but western tanks don't use any era, and if yes its small number of tanks with era. Than, in russia tank gunners looking for a targets. But in T-90m and T-14 armata commander can too look for targets like gunner.

@LeChat_Oleksii

3 жыл бұрын

No, M1A2C's hull isn't the same as first M1. The difference is like between T-72 and T-72B, and even more. Abrams had 3 or 4 upgrades of armor package during it's service.

@jaroslavdudas7227

3 жыл бұрын

@@LeChat_Oleksii all modern abrams tanks have the same old hull as first m1 abrams. They only put on UPF some steel plates.

Imagine how much SL and GE he gets from the link lol

Sooo is T-90M equal, inferior or superior to the latest abrams and leopard?

@kokonidas_9873

3 жыл бұрын

Actually equal but after that nato's things receive their protection system no and finally after they get their improvements it will be equal or even better because i don't think they will just improve protection system they will go further you know russia ☠

Finally 18 seconds early

curious... despite its only a plan?