It’s perfect. Never designed to be gmt. It gives wonderful clarity

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

Nah, it sucks ;)

@ts6640

4 жыл бұрын

For the life of me I can’t understand why every reviewer of this watch keeps mentioning the term “GMT”. Unless I have taken leave of all my senses (or simply retarded) the watch is NOT of the GMT variety. The additional hand is simply to indicate to the wearer whether it is am or pm. If we insist on using the term ‘GMT’ hand that is fine but rather misleading. At the end of the day, it ain’t that complicated.....set the actual time and then set the ‘GMT’ hand to the corresponding military time by using the bezel markers. For Instance, if it is 10:00am set the ‘GMT’ hand to the 5:00 position (or ‘10’ bezel marker). My comment is not meant as a critIcism to this specific reviewer, every review I have seen approaches the watch in the same manner. I just don’t understand why. Why in God’s name would you need a GMT function if you are spending a few days exploring a goddamn cave?

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

You meant to say “every reviewer except this one” of course ;)

@davidcollins4226

4 жыл бұрын

@@PerthWAtch I wouldn't say it's perfect but it is a very nice watch that stays true to its heritage (albeit with a growth spurt) and offers something different in comparison to the other (imo garish) modern GMT models and the boring old sub. The polar version is my preference and as Christian correctly pointed out, the GMT was a bonus feature added in the 80s with its original purpose being a tool watch that offered maximum clarity when you needed it most, in a cave for example. For this reason the non rotating bezel doesn't bother me, it would confuse me if they introduced it as it would ruin this history of the watch. Also I've never been 100m underwater and if I was, I wouldn't be wearing a Rolex full stop. Finally, let's not forget, outside of your clickbait title you didn't at any point say in the video that it sucks 😉

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

Actually I did list plenty of negatives... give it a watch ;)

Thanks for the video. Recently got my explorer 2 polar. I would say Exp 2 is for a different audience and its the only sports Rolex that have the non rotating Stainless steel bezel, although Daytona once used to have it. All the famous grail watch have SS bezel; 5711 and AP 15202. It's just something that ceramic bezel cannot replace; the texture of the stainless steel on the bezel are an art just like the bracelet.

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks for sharing those thoughts. Daytona bezel (still) does not rotate. Milgauss and Air King models also do not have rotating bezels.

I have one of these exactly like the one in the video... the brushed 904L has a white-silver shine that is hard to see in videos or pictures, but makes it a surprising piece when you see it in the wild. I love when people notice it because you see their eyes lock on and widen slightly... it's a surprise!

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

Haha yeah, I think I get what you mean, it’s different to the typical 316L brush appearance.

@Twizzlemenizzle1

4 жыл бұрын

It really does have a striking appearance

Thought this watch was ugly when I first saw it, it has steadily grown on me - now I think its appearance is quirky and quite attractive in a no-nonsense, utilitarian manner which I guess is exactly as it is trying to be. And I love the black and orange contrast. I agree in that I think they should have gone all out and imbued it with 300m resistance and the sub glidelock clasp to make it truly a go anywhere explorer, in that instance I wouldn't hesitate to get one and sure many others would too. Quite a fair review that belies the hyperbolic thumbnail in my opinion. I also like that you make an effort to reply to all comments, more content creators should do that.

@PerthWAtch

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks for sharing those thoughts - Pretty sure that if they made it 300m and gave a glidelock the price would be at least $1k higher... likely even more... Yep, the thumbnail is indeed hyperbole. Glad you can get that... so many others don’t seem to understand the concept!

I have this watch and the lustre from the bracelet and the way it presents in real life is amazing. It is my favourite watch now although it took a few weeks to fall in love with it.

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

Yeah I get what you mean, the finish they achieve on it combined with the character of 904L steel gives a pretty striking lustre!

Spent one of the best weeks of my life in Perth/Freemantle many years ago.

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

It's an awesome place to live I reckon :)

What is the connection to the Explorer l without the classic 3-6-9 numerals?

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

It's explained on the Rolex site... a watch ostensibly designed for "explorers" :)

Good review of a fabulous watch 👍 thanks Ivan

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

Most welcome James :)

Excellent vid. I love the polar dial of the Explorer II

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks dude :)

Do you know of any differences between a Rolex Explorer II (Ref #216570) which was produced in 2018 an one produced in 2020?

@PerthWAtch

3 жыл бұрын

The current model is still ref 216570 - same watch

The polar dial version of this was for many years my most desired watch. I still love it but as I've aged it's been surpassed by many including other Rolex models. I just personally don't see the value for what Rolex sell for (having said that I also never find myself going weak at the knees at the sight of "Swiss made" on a dial, so Rolex isn't alone in that). But like everything in life it's all about personal choice and personal opinions. Something I don't see the value in others will and vice versa

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks for that - some very valid sentiments there which I do share I must say. The value proposition is widely questioned for sure. So... which models catch your fancy more these days?

@77cjam

4 жыл бұрын

@@PerthWAtch If I were to get a Rolex I think I'd go for a White Vintage Air King (as sported by Tom Cruise in Cocktail). I'm a child of the 80s after all! Which is why I love my Digital watches and am more likely to be found wearing them than a mechanical. Again, just personal choice

@Milofchg

4 жыл бұрын

I've outgrown Rolex. They are great for what they are, but EVERYONE has one or wants one. It's no longer special and too many douchebags wear Rolex. I don't want to wear the same watch every other dickhead is wearing. I own a few Rolex watches, I will keep them, but I don't wear them as much. Rolex got boring and basic thanks to demand and popularity. I will get the Polar late this year or if a new Polar comes out next year (Explorer II anniversary). It's the only true tool watch Rolex makes. Everything is Luxury Sport.

Tks for choosing this watch. Myself consider the Explorer 2 the best of all GMT's, especially with white dial. Unfortunately the earlier price advantage was eaten up. A great tool, really. Cheers fm Singapore+

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

That's interesting to hear... what do you think of the GMT Master II? Curiously I don't think the Explorer is actually considered a proper GMT watch, without the rotating 24 hour markings... Rolex doesn't actually market it as a GMT watch.

@achimkohlhage1328

4 жыл бұрын

@@PerthWAtch Yes, I know the Explorer 2 is no real GMT, but it shows other timezones. Thats good enough for me. Unfortunately this model was not available yet, when I bought my GMT Master II abt 25yrs ago. Considering, what I've done with this Rolex, they might well be the best of the robust. 3 services in 25yrs, day n night on my wrist, water, motorbike, y name it. Due to all memories, I cant sell it and at todays prices I'm unwilling to buy the Explorer 2, which, with a white dial I wud prefer for appearance reasons... A dilemma.

It does not look long used but seeing the accuracy I kind of smiled looking at my Mido Oceanstar a $800 piece performs +5 sec/day and not a bad watch compared with +$8000 Rolex. Mine is 200m water resistance having thickness 12 mm.

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

Nice watch that! Yeah the accuracy is disappointing here... my SKX007 remains one of my most accurate automatics and runs at about +2spd!

@WatchUnwind

4 жыл бұрын

the mido oceanstar is a awesome watch and in my mind very underrated

@trackpackgt877

4 жыл бұрын

I have a Mido Ocean Star iv in titanium they're great watches aren't they?

I think I agree on the water resistance, it’s supposed to be a go anywhere, do anything watch yet if I wanted to swim to Rotto in my explorer I would rather take a mariner watch (subby or 200m diver). It just never resonated with me but I do appreciate the style.

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks for sharing that - I think you communicated some of the unsaid thoughts in my mind! :)

@cirrusmckinney

4 жыл бұрын

Not sure you'll encounter any water depths this watch couldn't deal with on your way to Rottnest, With Rolex, 100 metres means exactly that.

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

@@cirrusmckinney Not sure either but it's not just about the absolute depth, but also dynamic changes in water pressure that affect the watch... which is why if you're gonna be water skiing it is recommended you use a 200m rated watch.

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

I mean YOU can claim you can go anywhere with this. Almost all manufacturer recommendations are that 100m is ok for swimming but not scuba. I’ll believe the manufacture. YOU can claim this movement has paraflex over the GMT Master II, but that’s actually wrong. Cal 3285 also has paraflex. YOU can claim this has the same resistance as a Milgauss. Rolex doesn’t - no prizes for guessing who I’d believe ;)

@bloodymarvelous4790

2 ай бұрын

@@PerthWAtch This is true for all 100m WR watches, except for Rolex. Rolex 100m WR watches are water resistant to 100m. You can go scuba diving with them, though with a twin lock crown I'd probably stay above the recreational dive limit of 30m. If you want to go below that, I'd recommend a triplock crown model like the GMT-Master II or a Submariner. That same triplock crown is on the Sea-Dweller and the Deepsea which can go down to 1200m and 3900m, so it can handle the depth with two fingers in its nose. It's the crush depth that's different. The submariner was tested down to 1000m, and it was still waterproof. Only the caseback was crushed and destroyed the movement. The Submariner is a sturdier build than the Explorer or GMT-Master, the Sea-Dweller is a sturdier build than the Submariner, and the Deepsea is a sturdier build than the Sea-Dweller, but they use the same seals.

This is a very nice watch and probably Rolex's clearest and most legible dial, especially in black. A good size and comfortable on wrist although the lugs could curve more to hug the wrist as could the bracelet if designed better, alla Longines conquest for example. The bezel can scratch much easier than a ceramic. The polished sides can also scuff very easily as the 904 is a softer compound although it is stated that it can be polished easily. My biggest pet hate is the taper on the bracelet. The oyster although well built, is a flat, old looking boring and bland style for starters and when it tapers to a child size clasp, it actually makes me sick. Does not matxh the case at all. However you can swap it for a Rubber B strap which looks fantastic.

@PerthWAtch

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks for your thoughts on this piece - I do agree it is perhaps one of their most legible dials of all. You're right in that the 904L steel does scratch more easily, so that bezel is not a great thing. Interesting point about the oyster bracelet taper... can't say it has bothered me but I get what you mean.

In a sea of Submariners and GMT Masters, this watch is a refreshing stand out. Simple, clean, perfect size for a big wrist, gorgeous orange on black complimentary color combo. My favorite Rolex.

@PerthWAtch

Жыл бұрын

Thanks for sharing the thoughts.

Great review of a modern classic. Casebacks are for engraving IMO🙂

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks for that - glad you enjoyed it! :)

@TWG911

2 жыл бұрын

Yes, engraving as they are common as heirlooms. I know I will dot hat with my Explorer 2 for my son. Great video by the way. :)

You didn't mention why you thought it sucked. You just spent most of the video explaining the specs. Sounded like you didn't mind the watch at all.

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

Watch until the end mate... discussed pretty comprehensively what I felt were the negative aspects

Hi, a good and honest review. I love the polar and the black dial (how I wish Steve McQueen wore the vintage piece). In the end, I got both. Cheers.

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

Haha wow! Do you have many other Rolexes?

@sk7321

4 жыл бұрын

Perth WAtch , no. Not at this point of time. Cheers.

@Ossory88

2 жыл бұрын

@@sk7321 if you had to pick just one, which one would you pick?

@sk7321

2 жыл бұрын

@@Ossory88 No particular preference for me. 😉

The 3187 movement went into production in 2011. So if this watch is about 8 yrs old, 6 seconds time loss is still good time keeping.

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

What you mean to say is that this watch could be up to 8 years old. It could also be much newer than that.

@bloodymarvelous4790

2 ай бұрын

@@PerthWAtch Also, regulating your watch isn't that expensive. If you find your watch is off, it may have gotten magnetized. A degaussing may be all that's needed.

Beautiful Timepiece. Hope Rolex releases a 40 mm Explorer II again in the future

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

I hope so too - that would be cool!

@bloodymarvelous4790

2 ай бұрын

A 40mm white dial Explorer II with the orange GMT hand and model name would be heaven.

The upside of the plain case back is that you could easily have it engraved since it's a blank canvas of sorts. This is not out of the question when you consider that a lot of people buy a Rolex to commemorate a life event. But that's just me; always looking for the silver lining.

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

Yeah I get that... just wish 1) Rolex tells us about this and 2) gives it as a (cheaper?) option to a standard intricate design.

@bloodymarvelous4790

2 ай бұрын

@@PerthWAtch There are $40 watches with intricately designed case backs. I'm not that hung up on it, unless it provides something about it's history or legacy. I don't need a big Rolex crown on the case back, nor do I need an engraving of a mountain range to justify calling it an Explorer, or of a Kraken to justify calling it a Submariner, or of a helmet to justify calling it a Daytona. They could move some of the dial text to the case back, like they did with the Sea-Dweller. I don't need "Original Gas Escape Valve" written across the dial. Having it on the case back works fine for me. The only thing I like the case back to do (if anything), is show off the movement, but that would mean that Rolex needs to start finishing the movements, because the way they are now, I don't need to see them either.

that cyclops doesn't look like it magnifies the date 2.5x. where did you get the watch from?

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

I thought I said quite clearly in the video...

@jo1948

4 жыл бұрын

@@PerthWAtch I mean where was it purchased from?

Looks good ond you great reviews

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks man :)

The black 216570 rocks, owned mine for five years, it's classy and sporty. The white just looks cheap with the plastic looking rings around the lumed markers, black is best by far....

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

Wait... those black indices surely are not made of plastic!?

The is no rotating bezel because it is not a GMT, it clearly says Explorer II on the dial. The 24 hour bezel on this watch is intended to tell am from pm. And as you said yourself it is not a Submariner which is why it doesn't have the 300M water resistance. This is a wonderful time piece if you understand its purpose and history, perfect just the way it is. The small fraction of people in the world that might actually use the three time zones on a true GMT is probably just a little greater than the small fraction of people who would ever use this watch to explore caves and use the bezel as "intended". I'm sure as you can tell by now I own a 216570, and love it a little more every time I wear it.

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

Yep, not a GMT, but rather a watch with a 24 hour indicator. Useful in caves, or the polar regions of perpetual night/day. And of course in space ;)

@bloodymarvelous4790

2 ай бұрын

It not having something doesn't mean it wouldn't be nice to have it. I wouldn't mind seeing Rolex implement the Glide Lock clasp on every model. I also wouldn't mind seeing Rolex implement an exhibition case back with the high quality finish on the movements like they do on the platinum models now. Is it necessary? No. Rolex (despite what many people are saying nowadays) still mainly makes tool watches. Expensive tool watches, but still tool watches. Almost every model they make comes in stainless steel, and many also in precious metals to cater to those who want a bit more bling on their wrist. The ceramic bezels may be more glossy than the previous aluminum bezels, but those were implemented because they're longer lasting, making the watches even tougher than they were before.

I see that there are not a lot of positive comments but this is a awesome watch. The 42mm version looks much better with this black dial.

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

It’s alright... I think I’ve said enough about the negative aspects in the video. Still, it’s a Rolex, which all the usual strengths that comes with.

Excellent review as usual. I have the 16570 polar, as I the 216570 is a bit odd looking for my taste. And puzzled as to why Rolex would decide on 21mm lug width.. just an odd size🤔

@PerthWAtch

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah agreed - I think the new 41mm Sub is also 21mm lug width!!

@eddy_8232

3 жыл бұрын

@@PerthWAtch hmm, didn't know that. Keep up the great work 💯

@bloodymarvelous4790

2 ай бұрын

It's to balance out the design better. With a 20mm lug width the case would look too chunky. On the 226570, they've widened it to 22mm, making me think the "21"6570 and "22"6570 references the lug width. The model number convention on other Rolex watches just added a 1 in front of the 5 digit version. Submariner Steel: 14060(m) became 114060. Submariner Date Steel: 16610 became 116610 became 126610. Sea-Dweller: 16600 became 116600 became 126600 became 136600. GMT-Master II Steel: 16710 became 116710. Daytona Steel Bezel: 16520 became 116520.

Thanks for the informative review. I've just purchased this watch for my first Rolex. I paid pretty much UK RRP for an absolutely mint unworn condition watch, originally sold in Japan in 2017. I have the new Omega Seamaster 300m which is a great watch and originally when I got the Explorer 2 I genuinely felt a little deflated I'm not exactly sure why. However over the last 2 weeks wearing the Explorer I have really grown to love it. The more I inspect it and gaze at it the more I am appreciating the build quality and the overall feel of the watch. I think my knee jerk deflated reaction was perhaps just the immediate first impression as the omega is a fantastic looking watch however the comfort of the oyster flex bracelet is just amazing. I think I made the right decision not to pay the £13.5k for the pepsi GMT master especially now I know the Explorer has pretty much the same movement and all that really differs is the rotating bezel. In summary the Explorer is a fantastic looking and functional watch. When I decide to water ski or free dive to over 100m I'll wear my Omega Seamaster. And the extra £5.5k is definitely better in my bank than on my wrist for now. Maybe I'll see what the Covid 19 situation does to the grey market prices over the next few months and get myself a Pepsi if the price drops to 10k. Cheers

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks for sharing that - I think there are certainly some real strengths to this model... it is, after all, a Rolex sports watch. Please note thought that the new Pepsi GMT Master II has an upgraded movement which is better in a number of other aspects - no surprise Rolex would do this as they do not want to shoot themselves in the foot providing a model in the Explorer II that is too close. Glad to hear you are loving it! ATB :)

I'd like to debunk the 904L-myths that circulate. 904L is more corrosion resistant than 316L. It is not harder, but actually a little softer. It is not more difficult to machine, but you can't use tools for 316L to mill 904L. Because the market for tools to work 904L is far smaller, they are more expensive. That and only that is what makes 904L watches more expensive: the tools to machine it, and the fact that Rolex does it. Chinese fakes made of 904L steel exist and are, guess what, not really more expensive than other fakes. It can be done without the ridiculous markup if you want it, Rolex:) Price of raw 904L is only marginally higher than 316L and should not be reflected in something the size of a watch.

@dylvasey

4 жыл бұрын

Interesting read. Thanks for your post.

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks for sharing that Bob - can ask what profession or background you're from? It's because much of what I say about 904L come from people who work in the industry and who have proven to be reliable to me.

@Bob.martens

4 жыл бұрын

@@PerthWAtch I have a master in physical chemistry, admittedly not metallurgy. I got fed up with the lack of reliable information on the subject of 904l v. 316 steel, so I did my own. I have stated this knowledge as facts ever since. I am all for getting the facts right, so if I'm wrong somehow, please tell me.

@Bob.martens

4 жыл бұрын

@@PerthWAtch These guys come to the same conclusions I did, and they seem legit: www.keepthetime.com/blog/316l-vs-904l-stainless-steel-in-watches/

@Bob.martens

4 жыл бұрын

@edwong3 904l typically contains about double the amount of Nickel compared to 316l. For some people that means their Ni-allergy might be triggered more easily by 904l than by 316l. If you are truly allergic, none of both are options.

Nice review. Definitely not something I would buy, too expensive. However, it is nice. Does not need the cyclops, the date changes once a day, really don’t know why it gets highlighted. I’m curious about these chronometer-rates watches. Are they able to maintain this accuracy over time? This one is running faster this it’s certified to run at. However, there is nothing wrong with +6. There are so many variables that affect accuracy. Is giving it such small parameters practical? Would be nice to have something on he caseback. I doubt Rolex will change. I’m completely lost on the price, especially if the accuracy rating is unrealistic.

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the thoughts as always mate! Regarding the cyclops... I have been thinking about this and I wonder if it is because the typical buyer will have started to have presbyopia, hence needing the magnification to read the date! Re: accuracy... oh absolutely nothing wrong about +6spd... unless of course they watch is claimed to have +/-2spd. Then it's just... well, wrong! Accuracy of mechanical watches can deteriorate over time if not serviced, which may be the case here. But it is disappointing nonetheless.

@bloodymarvelous4790

2 ай бұрын

@@PerthWAtch The cyclops came about when Mrs. Wildorf complained she had trouble reading the date on her watch. Since then every Rolex with a date complication received a cyclops lens (apart from the more extreme dive models like the Sea-Dweller and the Deepsea, which they couldn't apply either because the glue couldn't stand up to those pressures or the thickness of the crystals made the cyclops lenses ineffective). On mechanical watches, nothing is constant or eternal. They can lose accuracy over time due to magnetism, degrading lubrication, or the balance or regulator getting disturbed. The same goes for water resistance. The seals deteriorate over time, reducing the water resistance. It's recommended to have the water resistance checked every year to prevent water ingress when submerged.

Nice review thanks

@PerthWAtch

3 жыл бұрын

Most welcome :)

i bought this watch today model 2021. nzd13200, first sold in NZ, at meantime other 7 ppl on waiting list wait for this oneas well. very simple reason, because i want new daytona, and when AD offer you entrylevel watch you better take it. but it is still very good watch for everyday

@PerthWAtch

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks for sharing - all the best in your quest for a Daytona :)

I saw in one of the comments that someone thought that in 2021, the Explorers will be updated with the new movement. Right now I'm considering the Explorer 39 or Explorer ii 40 or 42mm. But, would be disappointed if the make an upgrade in 2021. But let's be honest, even if you have the money to buy, very very very very few people will get to even touch one. What do you think? Will they upgrade? Lastly, I like the larger dial circles and indices chromalight lume vs the superluminova of 40mm

@PerthWAtch

3 жыл бұрын

Yes I suspect the same, that they will likely upgrade this next year or in 2022.

@bloodymarvelous4790

2 ай бұрын

Models get updated regularly. Different dials, different cases, different bracelets, different movements. If you're afraid you'll miss out on the next update you'll never buy a watch. For me personally, I much prefer the 31xx movements over the 32xx movements, but that's because I'm OCD. If I move the crown clockwise, I want the hands to move clockwise. With the 32xx movements, the hands move counter-clockwise. My brain can't stand that.

@scorpianbliz

2 ай бұрын

@bloodymarvelous4790 I got the 39, but prefer the new 36, the crystal is amazing on that model. Really dislike the 40mm, looks out of proportion...

@PerthWAtch

Ай бұрын

I love the 40mm (38.9mm) model… it’s the best!

Think of the Explorer II as the GMT journeyman. The GMT Master, masters the art of GMT timekeeping. The Explorer II gets it done. It’s the Submariner to the Sea Dweller. The Sub is a dive watch-they get the trinkets. Explorers are tool watches. Goodenoughs Just my thoughts.

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

Trinkets??

@dc8782

4 жыл бұрын

The little things desk divers/explorers subjectively feel make a watch the best watch, sans objective thought to why the features are model line specific.

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

Interesting!

Great video, I think you hit the nail on the head about what is lacking from that particular Rolex.

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks for that - glad you enjoyed it :)

And this was the ONLY Rolex I was ever even considering!! (Post Lotto win, of course!) I had no idea the case back was so blah! Give me a Seiko wave any day! Nice new studio by the way! Thanks for keeping us connected!

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks for that - I've used this room a number of times already, but yeah only since late last year I think :)

@GinkgoJoe

4 жыл бұрын

A. B. read it again! I did not compare them, nor did I say Seiko is better: I simply said I prefer the wave case back to a plain one. Calling me a novice, dumb, and idiotic based on my case back preference is a bit of a stretch. Please check your judgement at the door and keep the hobby fun, my friend. It's just a wrist watch....

@WatchUnwind

4 жыл бұрын

some people love the rolex case base simplicity and some hate it

@Twizzlemenizzle1

4 жыл бұрын

Don't let this review put you off the Explorer 2. You won't be disappointed. It truly is a beautiful watch and considering the price differences on the grey market, pound for pound the Explorer 2 is truly fabulous.

It depends on which model and how much you paid. I’ve got a vintage black dial (model 16570) which was always my preferred model to the current model as the dimensions (40mm) look so much more proportional and subtle. And I paid well under $5k for one in incredible condition so I got lucky.

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

Awesome man, sounds like you got a great deal! :)

Good review bro...👍

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks man :)

Considering that the explorer is cheaper than a GMT, it makes sense that Rolex doesn’t put a rotating bezel on the explorer. If you need a divers watch them that is what the submariner and sea dweller is for. Different watches for different applications.

@PerthWAtch

3 жыл бұрын

No rotating bezel and also the older less advanced movement. If you need a divers watch, don’t go for the Sub or Sea-Dweller as you would likely die of old age waiting for one to be allocated to you!

decorate the caseback? a bit of art for the prize they charge? They could engrave the Sistine chapel for that prize

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

Yes they could do that for the price. Whatever the case is, one feels that the sterile back is just... lacking.

@wannabetechnician7451

4 жыл бұрын

or at the very least the water resistance rating

You could have told us so much more. Origin of the model, the previous models leading up to this one, the alternative options available, details of the dial such as materials used. The other parts of the watch and the materials used (hands etc). The weight you quoted is incorrect (there must be a link missing). Whilst you compared it to the GMT and pointed out where it wasn't offering as many features you failed to mention it's $2000 cheaper. However, I enjoyed what you did say and always look forward to your videos. Cheers

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks for your comment. Many many things I could have included indeed, but at nearly 17 minutes YT tells me that is quite enough. Apparently "I can't have it all" ;) You probably missed where I mentioned that the weight is adjusted with links removed - very obvious I would say seeing as it fits my not-very-large 17cm wrist!

This purpose designed watch was never intended to have a rotating bezel. Hopefully it never will. Hopefully it will stay brushed stainless and fixed as it is. Solid case backs make perfect sense for Rolex if you think about it. Not that it wouldn't be nice to watch the Daytona do it's thing.

@PerthWAtch

3 жыл бұрын

Indeed, it is purpose designed primarily for one thing: maximising company profits by not duplicating what the GMT Master already does (and does better). 904L steel bezel is a bitch given how easily it scratches. As for the case back, solid makes sense if the movement is ugly, which is the case with Rolex. But I wasn’t suggesting they make it display, more that they give us something nicely crafted (see Omega).

I love the polar explorer 2

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

You're not a lone - it is rare to have a white dial sports Rolex!

Like the GMT-Master, the "GMT" hand was meant as a 24 hour hand. When the GMT-Master went the way of the dodo, and the GMT-Master II was introduced, it got an hour hand that you could set independently from the GMT hand. Rather than designing a new movement for the Explorer II, they just used the same movement they had for the GMT-Master II. The added bonus is that you can use the Explorer II as a GMT/travel watch. If you want the rotating bezel, you should get the GMT-Master II though. If the Explorer II had a rotating bezel, it would just be a GMT-Master II, so I don't get that criticism. If that's your reasoning, you should be equally upset the Submariner doesn't have a helium escape valve or can only go to 300m, when the Sea-Dweller can go down to 1200m. Another thing is that 100m water resistance means something different with Rolex than it does with other brands. 100m WR generally means you can go surface swimming with the watch. With a Rolex that means it's water resistant to 100m, and probably beyond that. You can go scuba diving with this watch and it will be perfectly fine (provided you regularly have the case checked for water resistance). The major selling point for this watch, for me, is the white dial. That sets it apart from other sports models in Rolex's lineup. You don't notice the cyclops lens that much because it's enlarging a white date wheel against a white dial. The contrasting black outlines on the hands and indices makes it supremely legible. Far better than the black dial in my humble opinion. The only thing I don't like is the case size. I wish they still had a 40mm version. The first time I laid eyes on Rolex watches I thought they were hideous, but I've come to appreciate them. My favorite being the 116600 Sea-Dweller. Other than the first 6 digit Sea-Dweller, my preference generally lies with the 5 digit models. I quite like the modern vintage Rolex watches, with my favorites being the 14060M Submariner, 16710 GMT-Master II Coke or Pepsi, and the 16570 Explorer II.

@PerthWAtch

Ай бұрын

The lack of a rotating bezel was mentioned along with a list of other things Rolex deliberately held back (trip-lock crown, glide-lock clasp, movement etc) to neuter this watch so they can justify marketing it alongside the GMT Master II. To isolate that comment is to miss the point. Rolex is the only brand that dares to say "waterproof". Essentially everybody else says "water resistant". Look it up - it's not the same thing. Also see comment about dynamic spikes in water pressure with sports which might kill some watches. I agree with your comment about the white dial... except that it's not the only sports model that has a white dial version. And thanks for sharing your thoughts about the 5-digit models often being more preferred.

Just bought 16570.. probably hang on to it for a while before trying to flip it

@PerthWAtch

Жыл бұрын

Were you always intending to flip it?

I’ve had a polar 16570 for 10 years now. Love the watch. I think the 40mm is better for most than the 216570.

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

Nice... you bought it used then? I agree - 40mm is more universally suitable.

@parenpi

4 жыл бұрын

Perth WAtch used and cheap....2500$ USD in 2010.... can’t believe how much they went up in price.....

@flamadiddledoo

4 жыл бұрын

Completely agree

@joshbostic4917

4 жыл бұрын

The peak of Rolex design occured in the 80s and 90s with the 5-digit references. Ever since the release of the 6-digit references it's been a continual downward spiral. Modern Rolexes with their giant cases, fat lugs, and shiny center links certainly get noticed, but it's the wrong type of attention. Nothing beats the understated elegance and graceful lines of the Rolex 5-digit references. The 16570 Polar is IMO one of the best Rolexes of any era. Awesome piece you have there. :)

Cracking review, hope your all staying safe down there....I think the explorer is a superb piece, it can't be denied....is this for me.... absolutely not, but that doesn't stop me appreciating the attention to detail and quality of materials used....it suits every occasion, whether your in a boardroom, kicking back on the beach or are out and about in the wilds....we'd all love belt and braces water resistance but for the majority of users 100m is way more than enough.... personally I'd go for the EX1, 36 or 39mm no date or GMT just a traditional field watch, that would be my ideal Rolex....⌚🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿⌚🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks for sharing those very good thoughts. I too find myself gravitating toward the Explorer I, but for the price difference and similarity (not to mention ease of acquisition), the 39mm standard Oyster Perpetual might do me just as well! What do you think of that model?

@briancolyer8483

4 жыл бұрын

@@PerthWAtch I certainly do like this one also, watch master has this www.watchmaster.com/en/rolex/oyster-perpetual/114300/K0Z6FQM1ZB?reference_code=IKAAY3IO7O this is not a recommendation to anyone as I've never had any dealings with this firm, but I do love everything about it, especially that touch of blue....unfortunately for me the closest I'd get is a homage....⌚🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿⌚🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

Yeah nice one, that gray with touch of blue is pretty cool!

Honestly - who needs 300m water resistant this days? For me, and after owing several Rolex sport models - this one is the only who still keep the Tool spirit with highly legibility, robust and excellent functionality... best sport model to travel and from any sport activity to the board room ...

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

I need 300m... you should see the splashes I make doing the dishes!

@impexRQ

4 жыл бұрын

Perth WAtch 🤣

Interesting piece. Regards.

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks. Regards.

I like the overall color scheme and design but the size of the case, bezel, handset and hour markers look disproportional. The previous 5 digit reference had much better proportions. That is why I got the SBGN003. Similar bezel and color scheme but much better case, dial and handset. And for a GMT watch I prefer quartz.

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the thoughts - why prefer quartz for a GMT watch?

@heinrich3427

4 жыл бұрын

@@PerthWAtch Setting the date, GMT, hour and minute hands ones the watch stops is tedious. That is why I prefer time only watches for mechanical watches. Even with a quick set date you have to figure out AM/PM before setting the watch. Just yesterday I set it wrong and today it was still the 10th instead of the 11th 😂

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

I see... fair enough!

Great review, CRAZY money, just saying.

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

Haha check out the Patek Sky Moon Tourbillon!

I'm guessing the blank case back is for engraving and customization, which was popular during the last half of the last century. Prefer a fancy design instead. Good video. Like the polar better. Don't think I'd ever own one, but who knows.

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks for that - yeah I wish they’d default a nice engraving and give a display or plain back as options!

@shino8854

4 жыл бұрын

Skeletonized to view the movement would be nice.

I think this is an excellent watch for daily use. Not a Submariner fan myself. The finishing on these Rolex watches is impressive. If I had the choice, I would buy a Omega Seamaster instead. Relatively cheaper and just as nicely finished. But, it is a very attractive watch! Thanks Ivan!

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks Joop - glad you enjoyed the video. Stay safe!

@mikearkous8379

Жыл бұрын

@@PerthWAtchnice review. Thinking of getting this one over new one mainly cause of price. Does it feel Balanced when you wear it?

@PerthWAtch

Жыл бұрын

What do you mean “balanced”?

I really wish they also did the same floating effect on the seconds hand.

@PerthWAtch

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah good point!

@PerthWAtch

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah good point!

Reasoning that a watch running out of time is a result of Rolexes quality control and bot the previous owner is quite bizarre

@PerthWAtch

5 ай бұрын

Who said “running out of time”? Who said anything about “previous owner”? You really should watch the video before you comment. Free life lesson for you there mate 🤣

It is actually annoyingly not a quick watch to read at a glance. The gmt hand clutters the picture, yet that orange slash is one of its attractions...

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

I get what you mean!

When I look at the dial, I ask myself how much more black can it be. And the answer is none. None more black.

@redastrachan8978

4 жыл бұрын

Because of the date window, the indices only number 11

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

It's pretty darn black... but take a look at the H Moser & Cie Vantablack, it's some special material that apparently sucks in light like a black hole! www.h-moser.com/en/news/03-2019-3

@FrankPersico

2 жыл бұрын

you can see yourself it BOTH sides..

Add a black ceramic bezel insert to a scalloped bezel would go a LONG WAY to giving this watch more bling that it is missing. Satin all around except the sides like a sub with that DEAD bezel is a deal breaker for me.

@PerthWAtch

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah well described... I agree!

Is it just me or is that date wheel seem to small?

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

Another viewer also mentioned that the magnification of this cyclops seems a bit off...

Love that watch..

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

Cool - you got one too?

@terryb8310

4 жыл бұрын

@@PerthWAtch Not yet ... but I have the Explorer 1 ... both great watches.

I love this watch.

@PerthWAtch

3 жыл бұрын

Why?

Case back- the way I see it is even the cheapest watches have an engraved or transparent case back. Rolex could do it like every other company but staying “boring” is a major part of their long game.

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

Sure sounds like a part of their game that they excel at! ;)

I rather prefer the plain caseback of my GMTIIs. "Many other watches do it..." because they have to. This is Rolex's way of 1) saying eff you, we're still selling watches and 2) staying true to their history if simplicity

@PerthWAtch

3 жыл бұрын

Interesting view. I can agree with point 1, but not sure about point 2 - 4 links of text on the lower half of dials like the Submariner is not considered "simplicity" IMO.

I am not a big fan of Rolex, but that watch looks quite stunning. Don't like the cyclops though

@PerthWAtch

3 жыл бұрын

I think it looks ok... still definitely not a model I would pick up.

@watchalot919

3 жыл бұрын

@@PerthWAtch All personal taste I suppose. I own a Steinhart Vintage GMT which isn't a mile away. let me know what you think Ivan www.steinhartwatches.de/en/ocean-vintage-gmt-neu.html

@PerthWAtch

3 жыл бұрын

Oh I love Steinhart and the sheer value they represent - still pretty much unrivalled at their prices, but you do have to accept they are homage. I have owned and reviewed quite a few :)

@watchalot919

3 жыл бұрын

@@PerthWAtch we live in a world where 99% of consumables are a homage to something else. It's only some watch enthusiasts that have an issue with it, I don't

Is the gmt hand off?

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

Nah pretty sure it’s on

@bloodymarvelous4790

2 ай бұрын

Yeah, pretty sure it's there.

hi Ivan, how are you again, there? Not really much to say about Rolex in general. Rolex is Rolex. However, there is one thing that is very strange. Normally all the Rolex cyclops has 2.5 magnification, of course, including Exploror II. But this one that you are showing me only has x2 magnification. The owner changed to after-market crystal? for me, that was the first give-away that it looks kind of "fishy"....Ivan, can you double check that for me? thanks

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

Hmm good question Alex... it didn’t strike me at first but now that you mention it I think I see what you mean, it doesn’t quite look right. I’ll have to ask Graeme about it!

@bloodymarvelous4790

2 ай бұрын

@@PerthWAtch As he has the case back removed to discover it's not a real Rolex watch.

Did anyone catch that crazy 5 second jump @3:50? Or is it just me?

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

It's the result of editing

@reubenlym588

4 жыл бұрын

Ah ok my bad.

It seems to be as "under the radar" as a Rolex could ever be. I consider that a plus.

@PerthWAtch

2 жыл бұрын

Really? What about the good old Oyster Perpetuals? (Which you actually have a chance to get from an AD)

@jeffone

2 жыл бұрын

@@PerthWAtch A good option that is even more under the radar. I don’t think, however, that anything apart from pieces with fancy gems and precious metals are obtainable from an AD. I know locally they only give lip service to putting you on their waiting list without a purchase history.

@PerthWAtch

2 жыл бұрын

Depends on where you are. My brother in law walked into an AD and picked up a steel DJ 41mm earlier this year.

@jeffone

2 жыл бұрын

@@PerthWAtch I have not had that experience in Perth. I think he is quite lucky. Hopefully things start to change as we enter a post pandemic phase?

@PerthWAtch

2 жыл бұрын

Actually it’s not uncommon that a steel classic model (OP, DJ) might be available. Professional models (Sub, GMT Master, Explorer, Daytona etc) pretty much forget it.

They are saving this watch for another year to bring it up to date. They would be worried people would buy this explorer 2.And if it had the real or new GMT Movement . They worry people would buy the less expensive and use the movement on another build.

@PerthWAtch

3 жыл бұрын

Why would they be worried people would buy this watch?

GMT Master grey market price is twice the price of an Explorer, which can't be justified. Who wants a watch everyone has? Explorer is a humble Rolex and a wise man walks with his head bowed, humble like the dust.

@PerthWAtch

3 жыл бұрын

Nice!

Thank you for giving me a insight into this watch. It looks well made properly as good as any watch at this price . For me and it’s only my view it’s like going back in time similar to the design of cars looked, dated. For me Rolex comes in two parts the watch then the name. Again is only my view the name is bigger than the watch, The power of advertising.. The only reason I would buy one would be to invest not to wear.

@PerthWAtch

3 жыл бұрын

Oh I think most people would absolutely agree with you that the name is bigger than the watch here! For the price the watch is really not that special. The design is iconic, hence they will never play around with it much with each iteration. Advertising yes, but also the foresight (or luck) of being at the right place at the right time.

In some lights the dial looks chocolate 😝

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

Sounds delicious!!

Meh stuff to like stuff to slag. The marketing is hilarious. A 24 hour bezel. Tell the time in all light conditions on your adventures. Whether in the twilight of a cave (yes, caving for days on end where you lose track of whether it’s night or day) or at the poles where the sun doesn’t set. That’s really handy. I’m always lost in caves for weeks at a time, or sledding across the pole. The orange against the black looks cool. The size is nice. The brushed steel is resilient to marks so it’s a good daily wearer. But the 24 hour business is lame as hell.

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

Aw cmon, what about when you’re in space and it’s impossible to tell night from day based on your surroundings??

@bobbydazzler1780

4 жыл бұрын

Perth WAtch conceded. A fair point well made.

21 mm lugwidth is what allows for the SLIM CURVE + the THICK SOLID-looking LUGS, NOT AT ALL ANNOYING, you just DON’T UNDERSTAND its deliberately created shape, man. Otherwise a good video. I enjoy it repeatedly.

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks for sharing your opinion ;)

I like the sterile case backs of a Rolex I'm saving to buy a Rolex and for me the blank case back means I can have something engraved on the back when I finally get one as with a lot of people they buy a watch like that to mark an important time in their life or an important achievement and it's nice to be able to have the back engraved I'm never going to have to worry about reselling mine when I get it it's going to be passed down and stay in my family that's my opinion

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

I get the idea of the engraving... it’s just that so many others give a nice stamped case back with great design, and Rolex pretty much never do that, just stick with their plain backs. Not even giving it as an option to have designed back vs plain back.

Inaccuracy is pretty common, especially magnetism, bumps and dropping a Rolex. It will throw it off by seconds, eventually you will lose or gain minutes. They are not as heavy duty as Rolex fanboys claim they are. My Panerai and Omega watches keep better time. Seiko and Panerai lume is WAAAAY better than Rolex lume.

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

Do keep an eye out for my lume comparison video coming out very soon ;)

@jacc88888

4 жыл бұрын

Useful for know.

Yes the Rolex caseback is a big turnoff. Why do they do that, for inscriptions? Also the fixed bezel is a missed opportunity.

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

Inscriptions might be one reason but Rolex will not deign to tell us that! Pretty sure the fixed bezel is not to step on their own GMT Master II.

Personally I just cannot find anything attractive about this watch. I have an Explorer 1 and I truly love everything about it. I just can't collate the things I love about the Explorer with this. The only thing I will say is the black dial is better than the white.

@michaelriera6277

4 жыл бұрын

Agreed. This watch excels in nothing except carrying the crown on the dial.

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

I’d say bracelet comfort is outstanding, and legibility is pretty darn good too ;)

I would definitely buy a much cheaper, 40mm version homage of the Explorer 2

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

You mean the 39mm 3 hand version?

@nickrotas

4 жыл бұрын

@@PerthWAtch is there a 39 mm polar dial version with an orange hand?

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

Not in current production and not AFAIK...

An amazing watch. At $7,500 or so. I can't see how it's worth its current price unless you get your jollies from the crown on the dial.

@PerthWAtch

2 жыл бұрын

Yep, I get what you mean!

Hello, Ivan, hope you and yours are doing well. I'm no Rolex fan by any means, but the display title of this video comes up as something like "Why the Rolex Explorer II sucks". The video itself has the label "Rolex Explorer II...review " . You might wish to check this- I'm not trolling, believe me!

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

Hi David, thanks for your comment. I’m not sure if you’re asking a question here. Just to clarify, the text I put on the thumbnail is *never* exactly the same as what I write for the title... they are meant to be complementary rather than repetitive.

@timeandnourishment1961

4 жыл бұрын

@@PerthWAtch Fair enough, Ivan. I was just a bit worried that some loony might be trying to sabotage your channel, which heaven forbid. A very good review, by the way- we can always dream . Love your channel. Wishing all the best to you and yours, from Russia. Stay well!

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks for that - glad to hear you are enjoying the channel :)

This aged well, it’s red hot rn lol!

@PerthWAtch

3 жыл бұрын

That’s good 👍

New to the channel and found the review informative but didn't appreciate the clickbait thumbnail. You never really did say why it "sucked" - there were some negatives but hardly seemed enough for the overall watch to suck!

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the comment - if you say so, but IMO I presented plenty of reasons why I wouldn’t get this. “Suck” or not is relative ;)

Not Rolex's most popular watch, but to say it sucks on the thumbnail is a bit clickbaity, no? I had always preferred the white dial, but honestly, looking at this black dial by itself, it really doesn't look bad at all..

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

Maybe... YT told me to make it "attractive" while still being relevant to the video content ;)

@MyMarsham

4 жыл бұрын

I was holding out for a polar dial 16570, but couldn’t find one at a good price. I ended up taking a chance on a black dial variant, and can’t be happier. The black is more versatile and legibility is good as well. Give black a chance, it’s worth it.

Let’s see your complaints Loll a rotating bezel?? That’s called the GMT master 2, it doesn’t need to be that watch it has its own identity. Easy link is perfect for micro adjust it’s a whole link, glide lock is really needed for divers only. They’ve ONLY gone for 100M WR?? 😂 Only thing this watch needs is to be 40.5 like the new Sub and that’s it

@PerthWAtch

Жыл бұрын

Let see your comment Lol… looks like you don’t understand - watch the video to see why 😂

Could be a great Zombie Apocalypse watch?

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

Hmm... wouldn't be a bad choice I think :)

@WatchUnwind

4 жыл бұрын

@@f4nyang thats a great watch

@wildaboutwatches

3 жыл бұрын

@@f4nyang definitely good for zombies if you're hiding in dark place and want to know if it's light out or to wait for night to fall Who needs a movable bezel and one that could shatter this one would take a good hammering as the brains splatter lol

Looks like the crystal is an aftermarket crystal which ties to the fact that it gains +6 seconds per day... I can only assume it was bought from a fishy seller for a cheap price... Great video nonetheless!

@PerthWAtch

3 жыл бұрын

Or a crabby seller for an expensive price! Swiss Watch Box... apparently legit... 🤷🏻‍♂️

"Oystersteel" I can live with, but 21mm lug width?

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

Yeah... that kinda sucks.

Get a Tudor pelagos. Go anywhere do it all watch.

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

I fancy the Black Bay 58 :)

@WatchUnwind

4 жыл бұрын

awesome watch, and in person the blue pops more than the blues a lot of other brands use on their dive watches for sure. Ill be trying to review one on my channel in the near future for sure

I’m always on board with Rollie blasphemy. People act like you say their kid is ugly if you say nah to a Rolex. Personally I don’t care for the looks of any Rolex, and most peoples children suck. Good review man!

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

Haha thanks for that. Hey, wait... my children are awesome! ;)

@dinner_workingsly

4 жыл бұрын

Mine too, we are one percenters.

@impexRQ

4 жыл бұрын

Definitely- boring design (unrefined) not advance technology in the movement not decoration in the movement - there is some many stunning watches around to have something like this one ...

For a third the price I'll stick to Breitling for a tool watch.

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

Breitling is a good choice IMO... which model do you fancy?

@michaelriera6277

4 жыл бұрын

@@PerthWAtch I have a Colt 41 with the older blue military dial, all satin/brushed. I've tried the new Avenger 43 and although bigger than my 41, it still is very comfortable and proportionate. The bracelet amazing and the watch feels solid and expensive. It can be purchased for $2600 gray market. That is an amazing price for what you get with a Breitling.

@michaelbishop9157

4 жыл бұрын

Breitling is the ultimate overpriced shitter watch

@WatchUnwind

4 жыл бұрын

Breitling > Rolex for me too. I absolutely love Breitling and although they are so popular I think they are still underrated when compared to Omega or Rolex. I Just shot some video with a older SuperOcean and i loved it. I invite you to subscribe to my channel and check out the review it will be out in a few weeks. This watch is easily found used under or right around 2k

@WatchUnwind

4 жыл бұрын

@Noggsy joggsy watches two awesome watches

♥Perth WAtch

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

:)

For those of you wondering why he held back on saying why it sucks - his mate has sadly paid over 10k for this watch, it would be cruel to rub salt into that wound. He’s also probably wary of all the Rolex nutters who will become hysterical if he’s too critical of a Rolex. I however have no such concerns. Just look at it! It manages to be boring and ugly at the same time. An ideal watch for a man with more money than taste (or sense?). If you disagree - ask a woman what she thinks of the watch, and tell her the price. See how you feel about your Rolex then.

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

It sucks. Maybe he didn’t say it explicitly but I believe he gave plenty of reasons why he wouldn’t get this. You surmise wrongly - Graeme doesn’t mind him saying whatever he wants about the watches, regardless of the price... we are not in high school anymore. If he was wary of “Rolex nutters” he wouldn’t use a thumbnail like that. As for what a woman might think... well, depends on who you ask. Some ladies may have watches 6 figures and upwards in price, and this would seem like chump change ;)

@scorpianbliz

3 жыл бұрын

Haha 😄

The Sea-dweller has a beautiful case-back detail

@PerthWAtch

3 жыл бұрын

Does it? How interesting

The magnification of your watch is way off ... the date window should be bigger than what yours is displaying. You also forgot to take off the Chinese green plastic wrapping off of your case back. The font is also off everywhere and the links don’t have a seamless look to them including the Oysterlock clasp which doesn’t sit flush. That watch is a fake from what I see.

@PerthWAtch

3 жыл бұрын

Damn I should sue the arse of that useless AD! Oh wait... it’s not my watch... ;)

@PerthWAtch

3 жыл бұрын

Damn I should sue the arse of that useless AD! Oh wait... it’s not my watch... ;)

Many brands provide a beautiful case back even on $300 watches. A plain case back at this price in unforgivable.😡

@PerthWAtch

3 жыл бұрын

Yes, I feel the same way!

@Ossory88

2 жыл бұрын

Lol no. I like it that way.

I prefer the Explorer... less is more!

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

Agreed!

@WatchUnwind

4 жыл бұрын

Also like the explorer 1 over the explorer 2 , its so simple but there is something I like so much about the look of the watch too. Makes me want to go outside and explore

Other Brads engrave case backs to make a better product. Rolex Spends their money on Advertising and Brand Sponsors or Ambassadors. They engrave Minds . . Well lets not start something if we don't have to. Or don't start something you don't want to Finish. Plain caseback just keeps there profit margins that much higher

@PerthWAtch

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah something like that ;)

If you were an explorer you would really appreciate this gem!

@PerthWAtch

4 жыл бұрын

Really? Nice.