This watch looks and feels much better on a wrist than on photos. I stopped wearing my Datejust and Submariner after getting Explorer II and keep it on 24/7

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

Good point, video and photos don't do this watch justice.

@smjakober

Ай бұрын

Same. By far my favorite watch.

Love my black dial Explorer 2. I saw an interesting video where they asked women about watches, and the one they hated most was the Explorer 2. It’s an extremely masculine watch with its steel bezel and modern size. It’s not a glamour queen, it’s not minimalist, it’s a tool, you either love it or hate it. I will say the black dial is a bit more versatile dressy than the white.

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

A 100% the black dial you can dress up a bit better. Thank you for sharing that about the video, makes me like the Rolex Explorer II even more. Cheers

@DocJu474

Ай бұрын

Excellent comment. 👌

@mb9472

Ай бұрын

This is a great comment and got me thinking. My missus was not keen on the Ex2 but i bought it just the same. Perhaps this watch is popular with male watch enthusiasts but when your spending over eight K on a watch the over half's option can make you compromise on what watch you purchase. The ex2 is not for the pussy whipped. 🤣🤣

I just picked up my Explorer II black dial from an AD. After a long internal soul searching and debate, I realized that this watch is the best that fits my lifestyle. Not too fancy, but elegant, functional and exactly what I needed.

@cheynewalls

18 күн бұрын

Congrats, you will love it! An amazing watch, Cheers

I love your Explorer II content, Explorer II Owner here 🙌🏾

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

Thank you, Cheers

I feel the Exp 2 is one of the last true tool watches left from Rolex

@Drewtheonly

Ай бұрын

I 100% agree with this! Everything else seems like jewelry now

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

I 100% agree

@quickerthandrawing2822

Ай бұрын

it is.

@Patekcollector5205

Ай бұрын

Yes 🙌

I’ve got the ref: 226570 in polar. I agree… hands down this is the best of the Rolex lineup. One of the things I like the most is that I’ve never seen another Explorer 2 in the wild. It’s a rare piece for one and many don’t like it. And that’s a big part of what totally does it for me. I think it’s beautiful and perfect.

@cheynewalls

24 күн бұрын

Well put, I agree 100%, killer watch. Cheers

7:28 your spot on! For the price it’s truly a do it all tool watch for any situation including most of the water activities a submariner could do. People think in the short term but 10k divided by 50 years is 17 dollars a month. It’s truly a watch you can have for life then like you said pass it on to your kids. I own 3 Rolex and the explorer II is probably specs and price wise the best Rolex with the most bang for the buck. Same movment as a gmt master II for less than a submariner

@cheynewalls

23 күн бұрын

Couldn't have said it better myself. Cheers

Were you on a wait list before you purchased your Explorer II? If so, how long? Thanks!

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

Yes, I got my Rolex Explorer II just over two years ago and I was on a waiting list for 6 months. Cheers

Great vid for a great watch. Remarkable great and insightful opinions and input in this comment section. It seems you are attracting true watch lovers and not flipper suckers. Congrats for that and the vid.

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

Thank you for that. Cheers

I just picked up an Explorer II a couple of weeks ago, black dial. I've had several Rolex divers in the past few years, but they never stick in the collection. Fortunately I pick them up at retail, so they usually leave a little cash behind when they leave. I would love to find one that blows my dress up, but so far... I think the Explorer II might be a keeper. I'm a tall and well-built guy, so a lot of the Rolex offerings look dainty on me. I see a lot of guys complain on forums that they find the Explorer II too large. I was actually debating if it was large enough to stay around (keep in mind I do have more than a dozen Panerai, so my version of small might be skewed). I had a DSSD for a while, but while the diameter was perfect, the thickness made it too chunky. I do like that the Explorer is not a "typical" Rolex. I am debating whether or not it is sufficiently "under-the-radar" to accompany me to dodgier places when I travel. I threw it on a high-end rubber strap (Zealande - two thumbs up for them!) immediately, so it loses the bracelet bling factor. The most useful complication for me is a GMT hand, so the Explorer definitely wins out over a dive bezel. I could see it joining me in all but the most unsafe places (sorry London, looking at you). Best of all it is putting my Grand Seikos to shame for accuracy. 16 days and it has lost just 2 seconds! It would be nice if those were gained instead, as the resyncing is much easier. However, 1/8 second a day, I think I can live with the more complicated resync. I also rotate through a large collection, so many watches need to be set when I pull them from the box.

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

The Rolex Explorer II is most definitely stay in my collection forever, for all the reason you mentioned and a lot I can't get over how tough this watch is. I have broken Omegas, Breitlings, Hamilton and G-shocks when I'm out in the field. Not my Explorer II, takes a hit and keeps on ticking. Cheers

Great content on a great watch! Waiting for mine in black.

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

Thank you, hopefully that call comes soon.

I love the tool watch component of the Explorer II. There’s 2 things that are personal preferences that turn me off though: the orange hand and the 42mm size. If it was back at 40mm with the red hand (or even blue or green) I would be all over it. Again, just my personal preferences.

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

Indeed, great tool watch components. It is interesting, I'm hearing that from a lot for viewers about preferring red hand or even blue or green. My personal preferences is that I love the orange GMT hand. Everyone is different, good thing we have a lot of options in the way of watches. Cheers

Fun video, I enjoyed that! Love the rolex explorer 2 and your videos on it, excited to see the new watch next week and how it holds up to extreme conditions you put your watches through. Thank you for the great content.

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

Thank you Ian, I'm very much looking forward to putting this new watch to the test. Cheers

@ianness8277

Ай бұрын

@@cheynewalls awesome!!

I have the submariner hulk, I have a thing for green. But I am looking to get another Rolex thats not green. Definitely keeping an eye on your channel

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

Thanks, yeah we will have fun content coming out soon on my new Rolex Explorer 40mm as I compare it to the Explorer II, both as an everyday and out in the field on my photography adventures.

Love the Exp 2 content, and you hit it on the head! I’ll never sell mine either

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

Thank you, Indeed, It is such a great watch and I'm not evening going to sell it when it becomes a classic and is worry 10x what I paid. :)

Yes it's a classic. 16570 40mm. Interesting, I'm here today in LA visiting my daughter, and my wife took a day trip to Long Beach. Suddenly this video pops up on my KZread. (?) Great photos!

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

Thank you, Yeah the Rolex Explorer II is a classic. Interesting, I wonder if it does have something to do with your location, since we are based in Laguna Beach about an hour oh so from LA. Good time to visit, beautiful weather. Enjoy the rest of your travels. Cheers

@marcuslieberman3577

Ай бұрын

Cheers Mate. :-)

Love my black face 226570. Great weight, not shouty, but those who know know. Keeps good time and fits well. keep up the great vids!

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

Cheers

Interesting answer you give! Cool video.

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

Thank you! Cheers

Hi Cheyne, you are so right! The last real ROLEX tool watch, that's exactly what the Explorer II is all about. If I had to make up the choice for one watch taking with me for travelling around the world I decided myself für my EXP II polar. Always under the radar, second time zone, exactly fitting my big wrist and absolutely enough water resistance. And beeing not so popular even it's a real beauty really is a big advantage: You are the only one in a radius of lots and lots of miles wearing exactly this wonderful time peace. Many greetings from Germany, PROST! 🙂

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

Well said! I always wear my Rolex Explorer II when I travel and even if its a horrible travel experience I still very much enjoy looking at my Rolex Explorer II. Its funny, I missed my connecting flight in Amsterdam and had to wait over night in the airport as a standby. Still had a smile on my face as it was fun to see every time that orange GMT hand looking back at me when I checked the time. PROST!

@DerHerthaner

Ай бұрын

@@cheynewalls 👍👍

@DerHerthaner

Ай бұрын

@@cheynewalls 👍👍

Hey, great vid. At what number should this watch be selling at brand new?

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

Thanks, I think it is still selling above retain on the grey market.

It's my favorite Rolex and my Daily wear watch! The 42mm size is a downside for some, but for me and my 8" wrist it's perfect! The only thing that would make it better would be the glidelock clasp, but I make due. :0

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

Yeah, the perfect watch if it had that glidelock system. Cheers

@JohnBowman-ut4dz

Ай бұрын

Hi I'm agree with you I have a 8 1/2 in wrist and 41mm is the smallest watch I own so 42mm is a great size the only problem with Rolex is all the bracelet s are one link to small so I have to buy a extra link every time I buy a Rolex watch. which is a bit annoying as you pay £16000 for a new watch and they won't give you an extra link and they charge you £200 per link maybe there's not enough profit in a new Rolex to give your customers a free link for the small amount of people who have big wrists 😂😂😂

@ericmoss8344

Ай бұрын

@@JohnBowman-ut4dz no doubt.. I had to buy an extra link for my 216570 so I could wear it on the bracelet too. Plus, anytime I buy an older watch on the secondary market I always have to hunt down an extra link or two.

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

@@JohnBowman-ut4dz haha, They aren't giving you an extra link? Oh man talk to your AD about that. I have an "average" wrist of 7" and I take a link or two off, but my buddy is similar to you and Rolex has never charged him for that extra link or two.

I have been trying to get an Explorer 2 ( polar dial) for over 2 years from 2 different AD's. No luck. They tell me that they are not getting many in. And I have purchased 2 Rolexes from them in the past couple of years. Maybe someday I'll get "The Call". Not holding my breath.

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

I hope so, fingers crossed for you. Its that Rolex just are not making very many Explorer II watches anymore.

I would disagree this being unpopular, but do understand that one would find it difficult to come across this watch in the wild. My theory is, the sub, gmt master 2, daytona, explorer 1, datejusts are perfect contenders for a one watch person. Once they go down the rabbit hole, they realize they want more specific watches for specific occasions. I believe that is why you find so many of these one watch collections on the secondary market. Larger cases I believe also scares one watch collectors off because many flippers market the one watch contender watches as the best size, obviously not mentioning best watch for what, and hype the one watch contender watches so they can resale, but when you start searching for specific watches for specific occasions, the subs dial size could feel a bit small for hiking etc.

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

Very good point, thinking about it that makes prefect scenes. Thank you for that well thought out input. Cheers

I wear an explorer every day (36mm 124270). I really want to get a modern explorer ii polar but it might be a little big on my wrist (6.5inch).

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

Yeah a 6.5" wrist that is right about the lower range of the Rolex Explorer II, (in my option). It will look huge to you after all those years of wearing the 36mm 124270 :) Who knows, go try one on.

@Spartacus-hc9xt

Ай бұрын

@@cheynewalls the explorer ii is just such a great and functional design. The polar is certainly the color I prefer

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

@@Spartacus-hc9xt an amazing functional design.

@vcstaff

21 күн бұрын

I would say a 6.5” wrist would be the low end for sure, but doable. Try one on and don’t miss out on this perfect watch. My wrist is slightly below 7”, so I was concerned my 226570 polar would be too big when I got the call. I was pleasantly surprised. It’s ‘purposely’ large by design and wears so damn well. I know the ‘this watch is too big for me feeling’ that just grinds away at you in the honeymoon period. I’ve tried the Seamaster 300m twice and just couldn’t get past that feeling. From day one, this has not been a thought for even a second with my 226570.

It's my daily.... sold the 36mm Explorer to get it. Much more interesting and rare... right up my street

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

I feel the same about the Explorer II. Cheers

It's the size and bezel that keep this watch from exploding in popularity. However, if this comes out in Titanium, I think it will be incredibly popular. It would be even better if it gets back to 40mm or even 41mm like the new sub.

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

Very good point, if Rolex switched it to Titanium that would interesting. Cheers

@saodavi6267

Ай бұрын

Depending on how the Ti Yachtmaster sells, this would be a good model to make in Ti. 40mm would also be a win. Don't expect anything for a decade though. The current Exp 2 just came out a couple of years ago.

@darellhunter2205

Ай бұрын

@@saodavi6267 This is so true regarding the latest upgrade of the ExII. The Ti Yacht Master has been extremely rare to come by and seems production is really low at the moment. This could help Rolex with their move upmarket as well tho. The Titanium offering will be more expensive than SS.

Reason it’s not popular is firstly because of the steel bezel. It lacks any pop or bling…looks boring to many people. Secondly, if you scratch or ding the bezel, it will be cost a lot to fix or replace the bezel. With the ceramic bezel, it gives the watch a pop and is virtually scratch proof. Sure you can break the ceramic bezel but the chances are extremely low.

@Ferien7

Ай бұрын

Bingo. The general public sees it as boring. Unfortunately

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

Good points, I just love that it keep the steel bezel. But I'm in the minority.

Your video well covered all the points regarding the superb Explorer ll and it's being a relatively unpopular Rolex. That aside, let's face it. The Original Explorer in 36mm covers all situations exceptionally well and often better than the ll. Wear it to the top of Everest or under your tuxedo sleeve at the Metropolitan opera. The Explorer is effortlessly at home. Not so the ll with it's white dial, large size and missing numerals. Add the Ian Fleming and the first conquest of Everest mystique to the Explorer 1 and let's just say, enough said.

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

The original Rolex Explorer is more versatile and is a lot different than the Explorer II, especial the Polar dial. Either way both are amazing watches, built to be similar, yet so different.

Hi Cheyne, The Explorer 2 is a watch that just gets the job done and really is a tool and I think this is the reason for its lack of popularity. The other Rolex big hitters are looked upon as show watches

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

I 100% agree with you on that Dale. I love the Rolex Explorer II being just a down and dirty tool watch. Cheers

ROLEX HEAR ME :) ...The polar explorer IMHO has two glaring design flaws -- both are pet peeves for me. The amount of black on the hands way outweighs the distributed amount of black around the hour markers. In my mind, it should be more balanced. Also - the center of the hands is this big dark circle/dot (visually speaking). To balance things out, I think that should be colored white using the same material as the dial.

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

I think you are referring to the older reference number 216570. Rolex did do away big dark circle/dot (floating hands) with the current model. Either way I do agree its not the best looking watch in aesthetics, but I think so good looking as a tool watch.

Definitely an under rated Rolex, but would love to have one, especially the Polar!! Thanks for the video.

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

Thanks for watching! I do enjoy how underrated the Rolex Explorer is, such a great watch. Cheers

I never got over that damn Orange! I wish it was red, the size is perfect for me, but so many times I wanted to pull the trigger but I can’t get it to it.

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

Oh man, I love that orange! In my mind it makes it even for unique, I wasn't the biggest fan when it was just sharing the red GMT hand from the GMT-Master II.

I have the newest E2 and I have never seen anyone wearing one in Houston. I love mine, it’s my daily watch.

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

It is an amazing watch, I'm still so surprised that after two years I have only seen one other person wearing a Rolex Explorer II in public. Cheers

Love my 226570. Just got it a few months ago and rarely take it off. Also love that it’s off the grid. Subs are iconic, but a snooze fest

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

Its an amazing watch. Even after two years I pretty much wear it every day. I have to force myself to take it off, thinking long term to give it a break now and then from the hell I put it through. Spread out the wear and tear, Cheers

I got my Sub Date in 2021. I knew soon after that I’d want to add the Polar Explorer II for great contrast to my collection. It took much longer to get the Polar, there is plenty of demand, and Rolex definitely does not ship as many of these as other models. Your videos were great to watch as I waited to get mine. I have a 7 1/2 inch wrist, the size to me is perfect, definitely not to big, it fits my sweet spot. I’ve had it for 2 months now, it has rarely left my wrist. It’s so versatile. The accuracy has been the best I’ve seen. In 2 months, it has gained 2 seconds. It’s more accurate than some quartz watches I own. It was 100% worth the wait, and a definite keeper in my collection along with my Sub Date. 2 tool watches that both contrast and compliment each other so well. As far as the comments on “nitch” vs “niche”, it’s a regional pronunciation. In the northeast, most people I know call it “nitch” as well. Keep up the great work! I enjoy your videos and subscribed. Looking forward to more.

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

Great to hear all of that, thank you for sharing. Those watches go well together in a collection. Cheers

I picked my Explorer 2 up in February. If I had bought this Watch before my other Rolex's I would not have purchased the others. This watch is all you need.

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

Cheers to that!

I think the reason I really like it is the same reason it’s not more popular: it’s a Rolex that doesn’t jump out as being a Rolex. I’m afraid a lot of folks that buy a Rolex want it to scream “HEY…LOOK AT ME…I HAVE A ROLEX!”. The Explorer & Explorer II simply don’t do that. I love the Explorer II but the current model is unfortunately too big for my wrist. Someday I’ll have a 16570.

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

I agree with that, love the Explore line being simple and understated. The 16570 are great watches.

@deskdiversthlm

Ай бұрын

I have the same size issue but the 16570 is a great pick. But I also love the 124270. To date the Explorer one is my most traveled watch. Simply because it dissapears but as a daily my Polar. Both are great pics

@chriscon8463

Ай бұрын

@@deskdiversthlm Thanks! Great advice; you have some beautiful watches there! My daily for the past 2 years has been my BB58 blue. I think I’d love a 124270.

@deskdiversthlm

Ай бұрын

@@chriscon8463 The blue BB58 is amazing. One of the best Tudor has made in my opinion.

Looks great on your wrist! You can change your channel name to Rolex explorer fan club. Would still follow 😂❤

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

Love my Rolex Explorer II.

Sorry pal but the previous version was the pinnacle of the Explorer 2. The 16570 polar model is just utter perfection and yes I’ve never seen another person wearing it. The 40mm size is just perfect. I find the dial symmetry of the new model to be a touch off but do like the black dial version. My Explorer 2 is scratched to all heck and has a chipped crystal. Looks so badass.

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

Love the look of a beat up Rolex Explorer. Yeah the 16570 is a great model.

Minas this watch and only sold it because I got the GMT Master II GRNR one of the most perfect watches. Now that they are selling for retail and below brand new, time to get it again…..

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

GMT Master II GRNR is a great watch, if you can find it for below retail I would go for it. I'm hearing from a lot of folks there is still a 6 to 18 months wait at Ads and at my local watch shop, they're selling a new Explorer II for $ 13,100.

@koolpep

Ай бұрын

@@cheynewalls Explorer II I got offered just last week for retail. One was 2022 and one 2024 but certainly depends where you are located. My 126713 GRNR is lovely but I agree with you. Retail or below is the going rate at the moment.

Hi it a great watch hope the Rolex ad gives me the call soon thanks John.

@faresalf

Ай бұрын

I'm planning to sell my new black Explorer 2 on Reddit, if you're interested let me know.

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

You will love it, how long have you been waiting for it?

@JohnBowman-ut4dz

Ай бұрын

@@cheynewalls hi thanks for your reply only been on the list for this one for six months it took 18 months to get my buy metal sea dweller and on the list for green bezel submariner but it might take two years to get that one.i think the explorer 2 might take about 1 year.thanks john (from UK)

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

@@JohnBowman-ut4dz Thank you for that info! I'm getting a lot of questions from viewers on that.

Hmmm I think the biggest reason as to why the modern Explorer II isn't more popular is due to its size. I was dead set on wanting to get the #226570 (same as yours) but once I tried it on it just felt far, far too big and so I opted for the #16570 with the 3186 movement. I do agree with you in regards to the Explorer I - it's definitely more 'storied' vs the Explorer II BUT I still get more of an action/adventure/exploring vibe from the Explorer II's.... Great vid 🙂

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

Thanks, Yes, I hear that from a lot of people about the sizing. Great call with the #16570. I agree that the Rolex Explorer II has an amazing call to action/adventure and exploring vibe, but it was interesting doing the research for this video. To use a car analogy, it reminds me a lot of the Porsche 911 (Explorer) and Caymen (Explorer II). Both spectacular cars, but Porsche favors the 911 with advertising, more options, and just over-shading the Caymen, making it seem like the 911 is the better option. I feel Rolex is doing the same, if that make scene. Cheers

@jcnole77

Ай бұрын

Well then you have tiny wrist thats all.

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

@@jcnole77 It is all personal preference.

I think the reason is a bit different. I think how it started is not that important, but how it evolved is. Everything you, and I for that matter, like about this watch works against it with the general Rolex buying public. An average Rolex buyer is a while collar type, an analyst or middle manager in a tech company or an investment bank or in insurance. And most of them buy a Rolex as a status symbol. People why buy tool watch vibes and are nostalgic for 5-digit Rolex are a big minority of Rolex customers. A new Rolex today is closer in vibe and esthetic to Cartier Santos than it is to Rolex tool watches from 20 years ago or more. Important to note I'm not talking about capabilities here, new Submariner can be used to storm Normandy and jump from a 10meter cliff into a frozen like and it will keep ticking without interruptions, just like Explorer II, I'm only talking about looks. All the other models evolved in the direction of preppiness, pretentiousness, a more luxurious vibe. More polished surfaces, more shininess, ceramic bezel inserts. Rolex watches are as durable as ever, but no one is buying them for that. And Rolex is right to push this, cuz this is where the money is. And Explorer II is the black sheep of the family, it didn't evolve in this direction. Meaning it is not even a consideration for the majority of Rolex buyers. Edit: I'll add that Explorer II gives off low status vibes to non watch people, and if there is something upper middle class hates it is gadgets and jewelry that look like lower status

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

I agree, I was trying to get that same point across in the video.

Not as flashy as other Rolex model, not having ceramic bezel, bulky 42mm. This watch is great but i mean it is too expensive to have a tool watch if you are considering why most of the rolex customer buying a Rolex watch for. They cant show off with this one.

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

Love that it is not flash, Cheers

You literally answered your own question with, “in my opinion.”

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

I hope so, that was the point, a fun watch enthusiast conversation. Thanks for watching and adding to the conversation.

The reason why I'm not like so much th Explorer II 226570 is that I own an Explorer II - 1655 reference. And the comparison is pitiful, it's clearly a stylistic involution. If Rolex 1655 had never existed Explorer II 226570 would be very cool in my opinion.

@cheynewalls

16 күн бұрын

Interesting, thanks for your input.

Other than the exorbitant price, the main issue with the current Explorer II is that it's just too big. The older model in its 40mm case size was perfect. Regardless, I still feel the polar Explorer II is one of the best looking watches in Rolex's catalogue. That stark white dial with those contrasting black hands and the stainless steel bezel just looks incredible.

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

Yeah, That stark white dial with those contrasting black hands is a great look and very functional.

Wish it was a bit smaller - maybe 40 or 41mm. Wish it had an adjustable clasp - how is Tudor outclassing Rolex on this, especially at this price point??? Glide Lock should be a standard feature on all Rolex sport models. Wish it didn't have the male end link. And i wish the bezel text was a bit smaller / less bold; it is a bit visually overpowering. That said, the high-contrast dial/hands, color scheme, and general design language are perfect.

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

Tudor makes a great watch, but I wouldn't say they are "outclassing" Rolex. After wear the Black Bay Pro for a few months, I very much enjoyed it, but I have to say the comfort, feel and fit of the Rolex Explorer II is just in a different class. Either way tho, hard to go wrong with these watches.

It’s not as popular for a few reasons, the main one being the size. At 42mm half of watch collectors are sized out because it’s too big, hence there is half the demand and reason the prices are not sky high. Secondly it’s not flashy, many people buy a Rolex to flex and the Explorer II just isn’t a flashy watch. Final factor and similar to my second point, it does not include a ceramic bezel which is a signature feature many people want when buying a Rolex. As such I think it’s the third or fourth choice and personally speaking I only added it to my collection after I’d picked up a DJ41 and Submariner. However it’s my second favourite Rolex after my Explorer 40. 😊

@darellhunter2205

Ай бұрын

I agree with all your points above. They are all the reasons I love it.

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

Well put! I agree

Possibly the Explorer ii is less popular because it's seen as less versatile compared to other models. You can wear a Submariner with t-shit and jeans or a tux. The Explorer ii? Not so much

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

I think the Rolex Explorer II could be worm with a tux, but you are right, not as a good a fit as the Submariner.

The black version is by far the most unpopular. The polar gets plenty of love in the community

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

I thought so too, but according to the 4 ADs of Rolex I've talked to, the black dial version sells 3 to 1 over the Polar version. Also Rolex produces more black dial versions than Polar dial.

@davenportsimon

Ай бұрын

@@cheynewalls Get out... I would have never guessed that. I'm shocked! Thanks for the insight, I enjoy your content.

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

@@davenportsimon Cheers, Yeah it surprised me too.

I think the Explorer II white dial is totally awesome. But unfortunately, it’s less popular because to the general public it’s plain and boring looking, especially since it’s not flashy. The submariner, gmt master, and daytona have more going on and are flashier, meaning that they’re more visually interesting.

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

I agree, The looks of the Rolex Explorer II are its greatest attribute, but also it's downfall in the current watch market. Cheers

My AD has a polar in stock but I prefer the black dial. Unfortunately 6 to 12 month wait for the black ☹️

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

Really! Wow that is the opposite of what my and other ADs as well as people I have spoken with are saying. I'm hearing 3 to 6 months for the black dial and 9 to 18 months for the Polar. Also to they make about double the number of black dial as they do Polar dials. Thanks for the info.

@grahamwatts368

Ай бұрын

@@cheynewalls I’m in KSA so things may be a little different here. They’re bustling with OPs, DateJust and Day Dates, but seriously lacking in the steel sport models. Thanks for the reply and the great content 👏

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

@@grahamwatts368 It is so interesting, such huge discrepancies in different parts of the country. Steel Rolex sport watches are hard to come by anywhere, but to be bustling with OPs, DateJust and Day Dates. That is crazy. Thanks again for the info, Cheers

@grahamwatts368

Ай бұрын

@@cheynewalls sorry chief, KSA is the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. My bad.

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

@@grahamwatts368 No my fault, I thought you meant Kansas, Abilene. Thanks for clarifying.

Always enjoy your videos, fellow Exp II brother here - For those feeling the watch is too big, the black face tones the size of the watch down significantly. the Polar gets more hype but in everyday wear, black is going to be smaller wearing and more versatile. Also, this watch is quite thin given the size so it slips under a cuff easily. It does not feel chunky and the brushed steel bracelet is best in the biz. If you want to wear / experience what rolex was like 50 years ago, this watch is it. only guys that value the OG tool nature of the brand instead of the status symbol go for the Exp II. It's a modern classic.

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

Thank you. Yeah very good point, the black dial really gives the sense of a smaller watch and since it is so thin it does wear very very nicely. Cheers to a modern classic!

The Christopher Ward 39mm C63 Sealander is basically an Explorer II and it looks better, for less than 1/10th of the price.

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

The Christopher Ward 39mm C63 Sealander is a good watch, but can't really hold a candle to the Rolex Explorer II except for its looks. The Sellita SW200-1 movement in the Ward is no-wear near as good as the 3285, Manufacture Rolex.

@oweng7987

Ай бұрын

@@cheynewalls That’s true for sure, the movements aren’t comparable at all, but looks on the wrist at arms length are pretty good.

I like explore II , but older one

@cheynewalls

23 күн бұрын

It is different for everyone. I just really like the new movement they put in the current model.

I bought the polar 226570 precisely because it’s low key

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

That is one of the big reasons I got it too, Cheers

This watch is beautiful but they made it 2mm too wide just not to canibalise the gmt market

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

I hear what you are say, alot of people agree with that.

I agree with what you said. Only a few rolex watches that I would buy. Explorer 2, Milgauss, Root beer, Air King.

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

A very good set.

I’ve owned and sold it.. calling it the best is a stretch. For starters the crown being so small is just frustrating, and the stumpy hour hand is also another proportionally incorrect element.. it feels like those things were done on purpose to make you desire the gmt master more. The sizing is just too big, it wears larger than 42, so for most people it’s too large. Don’t get me wrong I love this watch, but it’s far from the best

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

Oh, I agree its not the best looking watch, but I'm more of a function over form. And it just looks like a tool watch, I hear that a lot with the crown being so small, I prefer a smaller crown as well as the 42mm sizing. Again its just such a tool watch that does look a little silly. The new Submariner and GMT are too pretty, the Rolex Explorer II has a vintage down and dirt look. Love that about this watch. Cheers

@TradeMarcmultimedia

Ай бұрын

@@cheynewalls I definitely prefer the chunkier crown of a Tudor when it comes too toolish-ness .. but they could have at least done the gmt master size. Again, I think it’s on purpose. Form definitely follows function with a tool watch, the crown being a pretty critical component in my view.. but I can see why you love it, I did too, but eventually went a GMT master.. even the exp2 is quite pretty and shiny anyway, they’re all Rolexes at the end of the day.. get a g shock if you want rugged imo

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

@@TradeMarcmultimedia Hi hear what you are saying, but the crown being to small its a "critical component" it works fine it just looks small and maybe a bit out of proportions. As a tool watch I feel the Rolex Explorer II is far better than a G-shock. In the time that I have owned my Explorer, I have broken 2 G-shocks. The G-shocks can't stand up to our snow camping expeditions. Batteries always go flat and the plastic becomes brittle. No issue for the Explorer , Cheers

@TradeMarcmultimedia

Ай бұрын

@@cheynewalls interesting to learn about the colder conditions for the g shock.. I wonder if they have a model that tackles that issue. Good that you have found a fit for your use case though, enjoy it, I did love mine

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

@@TradeMarcmultimedia Cheers

I dispute the premise of your video. It is an inaccurate claim. This is one of the MOST popular watches in the catalogue. It is also one of the least expensive in the range of watches produced by Rolex, aside from the OP and the Air-King. I have it on very good authority, from a friend and colleague that spent 11 years with the gold crown, working in marketing and media buying, that the Explorer II has out-sold the GMT Master II in some years between 2010-2022. The model is more than 52 years old and persists for a reason and a lack of popularity is the furthest from an accurate depiction or narrative of the model. [EDIT] You also claim that EII is the least produced SS watch, that information is not publicly disclosed, ergo, that claim is specious. The number of watches produced and the number sold is classified and it is only down to pure speculation on the part of AD testimonials and watch journalists. I know this very well, since I spent a number of years as a journalist in the luxury sector following these same speculative narratives. I also want to point out that your experience of not observing EII 'out in the wild' is anecdotal. I live between Asia and Europe and I can tell you that your experience is, seemingly confined to a narrow geography.

@cheynewalls

29 күн бұрын

Thanks you for your in-depth comment, All my information put forth in the video was from a year of research, talking with sales people from 8 Rolex ADs all over the world and interviews with two current Rolex employees and one retired employee within their head offices (art collector of mine). I understand a lot of this isn't public knowledge, I did my best to piece enough information together for this video. Like I mentioned in the video, just simplifying it all down. Over the last 4 or 5 years I have seen hundreds of GMT Master II , OPs, Daytonas, Submariners, Day-Dates, Airkings, Date-Justs, Yacht-Masters, Sky-Dewellers and Sea-Dewellers on peoples wrists out in "the wild". I still to this day have never seen a Rolex Explorer II Polar "the wild". That is why I did this video, now again how much Rolex produces and or sells is not public knowledge, but all the stats I mentioned where specified by at least 2 ADs sales people, a current Rolex employee and my collector, the retired Rolex employee.

If it's so unpopular, why the hell am I having to 'effin wait on one?!? Make more, ROLEX!!! Daddy has got 10k burning a hole in his pocket😂😂

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

Cheers to that :)

Answer: because at 42mm it’s a bit large.

@cheynewalls

5 күн бұрын

That could be a big part of it.

If it’s so unpopular, why am I on the waitlist?😂 It needs to be even more unpopular so I can get mine

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

If only, Yeah Rolex just doesn't make very many of the Explorer II, and it is a popular watch within a small group (me included). Therefor there is a waiting list.

Better not be an Explorer 1! My Explorer 1 I’m 36mm is my favorite piece.

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

Love the original Explorer.

I agree that it is one of the least popular, but not sure about unpopular. Anyway why does it matter? Doesn’t it mean that the that people really want it can get it? Rather than spending two years on a wait list? From a popularity point of view the spend vs what you get, it make sense to get a submariner if you really want to show that you have a Rolex. Esp since price point is in the same range. By the way; is that the ”big brother” that went up a mountain that you had there? Oh well only time will tell I guess 😉

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

You'll see next week. No you are right it doesn't really matter if its un or popular, it is just a fun watch topic to talk about with enthusiast.

@deskdiversthlm

Ай бұрын

@@cheynewalls this is true, but the limited popularity is in part what makes it so good. For me the later editions are just too large on the wrist but do love my 16570. Never meant to go OWG but my other pieces have been put aisde for a long time now. Looking forward to next week.

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

@@deskdiversthlm Cheers

It’s the GMT that’s not labeled as a GMT.

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

Yeah, same movement.

It’s because most “men” don’t have wrists big enough to wear the Polar E2. I’m 6’5” 250# and it wears like a dream. Let the little boys keep their little boy watches 😂

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

Hey, hey we are all friends here. Its all just personal preference.

My AD called today and I am picking up my 226570 this weekend. I opted for the black dial.

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

Hey Congratulation! You will love it, Cheers

@wda-59-14

29 күн бұрын

congrats! I also opted for the black dial and haven't once regretted that decision.

ex2 polar is S tier for me.

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

I'm scared to ask, what is the S tier?

neesh, babe, not nitch.

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

Sorry I miss spoke.

@Voltanaut

Ай бұрын

@@cheynewalls no worries, babe, still love you. keep it breezy, cheezy.

Perhaps its because in white looks more cheap than a submariner or a date just,tosporty for rich customer,and unknkow for comun people so dont have interest for people who buy rolex because they want to be recognize as rolex customer...

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

I didn't think of that, interesting. Thanks for that input.

Let’s vote! Rename the channel to Rolex Explorer 2 Fan Club 😅

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

ha..ha... yes you are right, but like I mentioned at the end of the video. Starting next week we will have a new watch added to the channel.

Not so unpopular... long waiting for white dial...and I've a filing it will go big in future

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

I understand there is a long wait list, but like I said in the the video, Rolex is not making very many Explorer II, that is why. Yes a good small group of people want one, its still only a minuscule number compared to the Submariner, GMT, Daytona or other Rolex models. Cheers

@igorr2d2

Ай бұрын

@@cheynewalls I agree, but in context of whole Rolex catalog, were there are 50+ models, I still thinks explorer 2 is in first 10 models on wishlist. Nobody wants datejust, or some 36mm but explorer, I know a lot of guys that wants. All the best

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

@@igorr2d2 Good point, I thought the same before doing the research for this video. We have to remember Rolex is a big global company and the US is not the biggest market. Datejust & 36mm watches are in huge demand in Asia and other parts of the world. Cheers

I have the previous reference 216570 in black with the ghost hands, I also have a Sub Date 16610. Both watches have a difference feel, of the two watches I'm edging towards the Explorer II. The watch is more invisible than the Sub, very rare does anyone comment on it I really like this. I swim with the Explorer II also, and take it into steam rooms! At first I got hung up on the twin-lock over the subs trip-lock, but learnt not to worry and trust the twin-lock.

@cheynewalls

12 күн бұрын

@@BoomerUKEngland I fully agree, the Rolex Explorer II can do it all, while being under the radar. Cheers

Why? May be because it’s doesn’t look as good as the rest?

@cheynewalls

22 күн бұрын

Personal preference, I think its the best looking Rolex watch, looks like a true tool watch.

I feel like Explorer 2 would become a classic masterpiece when it gets discontinued like Daytona did. Polor dial especially still has lots of demands from hardcore fans, right? Such watches like that won’t only get cult popularities once it becomes completely unobtainable.

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

Very big hardcore fan base (relativity speaking). Very good point, on one hand I do want to see it discontinued, on the other tho I hope not, as I don't want to have to worry about someone trying to take it off my wrist with it jumping in value. Cheers

"Nitch market "😂

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

Sorry I miss spoke.

Unpopular? It goes for 60% over retail!

@sergiogarcia9822

Ай бұрын

Definitively not today June 5th 2024, not even on chrono24 where prices are inflated, you would be lucky to get 1000 USD over msrp.

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

Well I have never seen it going for 60% over retail, more like 10%. Its all based on the numbers, Rolex doesn't make very many Rolex Explorer IIs, by far the least amount out of all there steel watches. There is still a small group of people who want one, with those very small product numbers there still isn't enough. Thats is why you see that 10% over retail.

@kemalcanocak

Ай бұрын

I am willing to give mine for the retail price. Dont look the prices on Chrono24 and think it is over retail. Nobody is able to sell with those crazy prices... , i am seeing same watches for months on Chrono24....

1. it's too big and chunky for most people. I really love the design of the watch but miss the old 5 digit reference size. 2. it's probably their most tooly watch, which is fine, but most people buying a rolex are buying jewellery, so a datejust/daydate, submariner or gmt etc are probably better suited for those reasons, even though the gmt and sub are tooly - they are still shiny pieces of jewellery. 3. it's a $10k tool watch, you could just get a very good g-shock and have an arguably better suited watch. or even a Tudor for a 4th of the price if you really want a luxury watch as a "tool watch".

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

All good points

I agree that it's probably their best model since it's relatively understated and a good value all things considered.... that said, I find the concept of a "tool watch" in 2024 to be cringe. Your phone, a smartwatch, etc all tell the time more accurately and cheaper. Wearing a watch in 2024 is a form of expression, I wouldn't boil that down to a tool... certainly not in the five figure territory to get one.

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

Well it depends how you use it, I talk about it in my other video that when I'm out in the field photographing I'm gone for weeks at a time and don't have access to re-charge my cell phone or a smart watch. Also I do a lot of camping in sub zero temps, my cell phone and smart watches battery go flat. Therefor I need a good mechanical tool watch, because my cell phone and pretty much anything with a rechargeable is useless to on these kind of excursions. As for the pricing, yes they are expensive, but you are paying for craftsmanship that if taken care of will last decades upon decades. Cheers

It’s too big

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

I hear that from a lot of people, but I really like the 42mm sizing. Feels like a real tool on your wrist.

Because the crown is too small

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

I have heard that for a few people.

When it gets discounted, just watch and see every Jew dealer try to scam you

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

We will have to see what happens with this watch, I'm not sure scam is the right word. If it is discontinued then the rules of supply and demand come into play.

@kemalcanocak

Ай бұрын

It it will never be discontinued... They will add seramic bezel next year, that version will be so populer

Nitch? Does he mean niche? Enjoyed the video otherwise! Would love and Explorer II

@cheynewalls

Ай бұрын

Sorry I miss spoke.