9:16 Farid: "the relationship between you (David Wood) and your emotionally challenged adopted son................................ Ridvan" 😂

@lemonke3774

3 жыл бұрын

Rip

@DrJames_YT

3 жыл бұрын

Lmaoooo

@abdulrahmanalenezi6068

3 жыл бұрын

Ridvan

@lion_hawk

3 жыл бұрын

😂

@ayyylmao101

3 жыл бұрын

Emotionally challenged 😂

Some more clarifications that debunk this stupid claim Wood makes that Farid didn't mention. 1) The divorce wasn't caused by Muhammad (pbuh) so that he can marry Zainab (ra) as Wood makes it seem. It was Zaid (ra) who went to the Prophet and said that he wanted a divorce, to which the Prophet said "Fear Allah and keep your wife." So if Muhammad (pbuh) really lusted after Zaynab (astaghfirullah) and wanted to take her away from Zaid, then he wouldn't have told him to keep his wife, rather he would have been happy about it, but he wasn't, so that is something false that Donkey Wood has made up. 2) Donkey Wood also says that adoption is abolished in Islam so there was no need for Muhammad (pbuh) to marry Zaynab and set an example. The refutation to this is that he did need to, to show others that adopted sons don't have the same rights as your real sons. As Farid touched on, it was against custom to marry adopted sons divorced wives as adopted sons were seen as your own sons during that time. That's why Zaid bin Haarith used to be called Zaid bin Muhammad until Surah Ahzab verse 5 was revealed. So because it was against societal norms, there needed to be an example set by Muhammad (pbuh) to show people that adopted sons don't have the same right as real sons, and break that societal norm, so this event was necessary.

@abdulkader7104

3 жыл бұрын

@abimbola chabi so u did not watch the video are u afraid or what?

@abdulkader7104

3 жыл бұрын

@Denzo Dridz lol

@Onemessagefoundationismyfav

3 жыл бұрын

@Denzo Dridz Is Santa Claus coming this year? If not, then your David wood is a liar. Since Santa has magical powers so he should actually cure the Covid on himself Who else agrees?

@Onemessagefoundationismyfav

3 жыл бұрын

@Denzo Dridz You need the spirit to come inside you to understand!!! Let me explain, the spirit coming inside not like going inside or up, I mean inside coming... Christianity doesn’t need explain! Are you a Mozlam???

@marwanerawan9297

3 жыл бұрын

@abimbola chabi so tell me why marry a stranger's exwife is fine but adopted son's exwife is wrong?? and that is based on what???

The Bible’s isnaad can’t even match our weak chains of narration. 😂

@adamyahya9567

3 жыл бұрын

loooool

@DrJames_YT

3 жыл бұрын

Lmaoooo

@lj9981

3 жыл бұрын

@EveryIsnaad IsFabricated Who told you that?

@DrJames_YT

3 жыл бұрын

@EveryIsnaad IsFabricated lmaoooooooo

@foxsan8136

3 жыл бұрын

@EveryIsnaad IsFabricated if you love to bring references then sure: From an early date Muslim scholars recognized the danger of false testimony and hence false doctrine, and developed an elaborate science for criticizing tradition. ” Traditional science”, as it was called, differed in many respects from modern historical source criticism, and modern scholarship has always disagreed with evaluations of traditional scientists about the authenticity and accuracy of ancient narratives. But their careful scrutiny of the chains of transmission and their meticulous collection and preservation of variants in the transmitted narratives give to medieval Arabic historiography a professionalism and sophistication without precedent in antiquity and without parallel in the contemporary medieval West. By comparison, the historiography of Latin Christendom seems poor and meagre, and even the more advanced and complex historiography of Greek Christendom still falls short of the historical literature of Islam in volume, variety and analytical depth. -Bernard Lewis, Islam In History, 1993, Open Court Publishing, pp.104-105

David's Strongest Argument is Farid's Basic tackling

@FreePalestine_____

3 жыл бұрын

I wonder why Christians are even complaining about this issue! Bible says prophet Judah had intercourse relationship with his daughter in-law without marriage. Biological son's wife. -15 When Judah saw her, he thought she was a prostitute, for she had covered her face. 16 Not realizing that she was his daughter-in-law, he went over to her by the roadside and said, “Come now, let me sleep with you.”(Genesis 38:15-16)

@mohbomran7087

3 жыл бұрын

@@FreePalestine_____ LMAOOO wtf is this 🤣🤣

@user-kf5uh2gz5m

3 жыл бұрын

@@FreePalestine_____ What the hell is this Authubillah

@alearner2748

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-kf5uh2gz5m you're finished you're finished wallahi you're finished

@user-rv3tt9kb7n

2 жыл бұрын

@@FreePalestine_____ LMAOO AUTHIBILLAH

May Allah guide me first, Yasir Qadhi and everyone else.

@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543

3 жыл бұрын

Amin, yasir the liar wadhi has supported the sufi shia mason kawarij ikwani groups...

@imammurrahsstudent8905

3 жыл бұрын

Ameen

@DryDownfall

3 жыл бұрын

Ameen

@postingyou

3 жыл бұрын

That’s selfish of you to be guided first

@imammurrahsstudent8905

3 жыл бұрын

@@postingyou R u kidding me

He's just jealous because the closest he's ever got to a women is when he dresses up like one and looks in the mirror..

@MalY481

3 жыл бұрын

@GuruTruthSpeak You have time and energy to deal with these lunatics?

@kifayatbibi8463

3 жыл бұрын

@A Kelly what did he say?

@Fozia-mt4wz

3 жыл бұрын

@Uncle KFC lolzz 😇 Bible updates faster than iphones Just have a look at these ugh 😰 biblical verses 😂 When men fight with one another, and the wife of the one draws near to rescue her husband from the hand of him who is beating him, and puts out her hand and seizes him by the private parts, then you shall cut off her hand. Deuteronomy 25:11-12 Now therefore, kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman who has known man intimately. But all the girls who have not known man intimately, spare for yourselves. Numbers 31:17-18

@maryeve3984

3 жыл бұрын

Yasir Qadhi is a Satanist pretending to be a muslim Is Yasir Qadhi showing devils horns on the following video The Reality of Jinn in the Qur'an and Sunnah - Dr. Yasir Qadhi

@lionking55541

3 жыл бұрын

@@maryeve3984 yup may allah save us!

Bringing Ridvan into this was simply... brilliant!

I was manipulated by Yasir Qadhi and was like why would an Islamic scholar lie and quote such a sensetive report if it's false 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️ Please stay away from people like Yasir Qadhi, javed ghamidi, omair Suleman and Jonathan brown

@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543

3 жыл бұрын

these are ppl who are ikwani, which is a sufi shia mason kawarij group... they sell out Islam and are too lazy to teach it... the founder of kawarij was thul kuwaisirah who argued with Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings on him about money, ppl need to learn history and expose these deviant groups!

@-Black-White-

2 жыл бұрын

They are not scholars!

@Hasnain1F

2 жыл бұрын

AOA. Why do you mention Omar Suleman? I don't listen to him but when I do, I like whatever he says, could you please elaborate?

@1ce2berg

2 жыл бұрын

@@randombite7411 can't find anything on him that is questionable. Can you let me know please?

@Hasnain1F

2 жыл бұрын

@البتّار الازدي Can you please provide any evidence for that? I'm not saying you are lying but he is an Islamic person and I don't just want to believe something bad about him without any proof. JazaakAllah!

"Bible's isnaad can't even match our narrative chain" bruh that killed me (Metaphorically)

@DrJames_YT

3 жыл бұрын

Lol, he's for real tho

@DrJames_YT

3 жыл бұрын

@EveryIsnaad IsFabricated lmaooooo ur name

@schizosndwch

3 жыл бұрын

@EveryIsnaad IsFabricated cope

@illusion2262

3 жыл бұрын

@EveryIsnaad IsFabricated that makes no sense. The point of isnaad is exactly the opposite of that? Why would we put in a system in place that allows us to verify reporters for the express purpose of lying, when we can just go the Bible route lol. That being said, it isn't as if you can just invent isnaad on the spot, and everyone will be like "sahih" and get on with their day. We actually have a grading system, and thoroughly verify the reporters. There are many books on fabricated a hadith (an example of us weeding out the lies). Your claim is unsubstantiated.

@illusion2262

3 жыл бұрын

@UCMXgn8f78IfeTp7A0RdUYyw so you aren't even going to try defend your point? My bad, should've known I'd just be wasting my time.

If I was David Wood, I'd be tired of all this lying and deceiving. I died laughing at 9:22 btw

@mohbomran7087

3 жыл бұрын

Allah yir7amk

@Diamondraw4Real

3 жыл бұрын

The devil never sleeps

[Quran 29:46]: *{And do not argue with the People of the Scripture except in a way that is best, except for those who commit injustice among them, and say, "We believe in that which has been revealed to us and revealed to you. And our God and your God is one; and we are Muslims [in submission] to Him."}*

@ayhemshaban9745

3 жыл бұрын

@aisha loved bacon What?

@user-rv3tt9kb7n

2 жыл бұрын

@@ayhemshaban9745 he’s a Weirdo

Couldn't stop saying "astagfirullah" throughout the video 😶

I love Farid's response...exposing Wood as the biggest liar...Christians should be embarrassed of David Wood...smh...🤣

@FreePalestine_____

3 жыл бұрын

I wonder why Christians are even complaining about this issue! Their own Bible says prophet Judah had intercourse with his daughter in-law without marriage. Biological son's wife. -15 When Judah saw her, he thought she was a prostitute, for she had covered her face. 16 Not realizing that she was his daughter-in-law, he went over to her by the roadside and said, “Come now, let me sleep with you.”(Genesis 38:15-16)

@7chip

3 жыл бұрын

@@FreePalestine_____ This sentence clearly mentioned that he doesn't know whether his son's wife or not, but Muhmd clearly knows that that lady is his adopted son's wife. Also, this is Genesis and how it connected to Christianity.

@FreePalestine_____

3 жыл бұрын

@@7chip She was divorced before prophet married her. Get your facts right. Isn't Jesus the god of the old testament?

@wroughtbychrist1664

3 жыл бұрын

I don't really get it why Muslim try to cover for their "prophet's" embarrassment

@ameera4767

3 жыл бұрын

@@wroughtbychrist1664 looks like you didn’t watch the vid and went straight to the comments that say stuff about the video without watching it

Why with David wood always talking about sex and before any story he always has to say “ she is the most beautiful woman in Arabia “ 😂 this guy has to get his mind out of the gutter. As for Yasir I just washed my hands the guy is either lazy to check or there is illness in his heart.

@essafi6976

3 жыл бұрын

That dude smashed his father with hammer so dont take his BS srsly

@faisalaljaber

3 жыл бұрын

JOESSAFI this is not the worst, I think the worst is to come😂

@essafi6976

3 жыл бұрын

@@faisalaljaber He lost to mohamed hijab and got exposed. Around world and he shows how ignorant he is

@hassanlabyad4082

3 жыл бұрын

Yasir qadhi was exposed for supporting evolution Who knows if the Lgbtq is next

@faisalaljaber

3 жыл бұрын

@@hassanlabyad4082 do u have a video of that I actually want to hear his support

Glad you mentioned brother Wasim Ismail.

@ibraheemhaji4732

3 жыл бұрын

Please link or imbed his channel here thanks

@MohammedAlSharif2002

3 жыл бұрын

Ibraheem Haji It’s in the descriptions

This is actually REALLY REALLY worrying. For him to have known the truth and then later distort it like that, hide it and then criticise the ulamaa of the past like that, I can’t think of a rational explanation that doesnt suggest something REALLY SINISTER.

*"And ironically it seems David is leaning towards the Pagan position."* Because he's literally one. *EDIT:* Guys, I think we should change our names to how I changed mine, so if someone finds us in comment sections of other videos he can be made aware about the existence of this channel. It's a good trick.

@Onemessagefoundationismyfav

3 жыл бұрын

I did it because I just love his channel..!! And sadly I can’t write Imam Murrah into my name.

@major7977

3 жыл бұрын

@@Onemessagefoundationismyfav Wonderful! I love his channel too and he's doing a lot to battle Islamophobia. May Allah (SWT) bless him.

@Onemessagefoundationismyfav

3 жыл бұрын

@@major7977 I suggest instead of saying subscribe to Farid Responds, I think we should just say Farid Responds channel is Awesome, Farid Responds channel is the best, Farid Responds channel Da Coolest... etc etc

@nightmare-yt4ff

3 жыл бұрын

kortobi mentioned several narrations including some which are similar to the ones found in tabari BUT at the end he mentioned narration narrated by ali ibn hassan who was ali ibn abu taleb grand son and who lived in first islamic century there was nothing which look like tabari version such as muhamed saw zaynab half naked and so on . when kortobi finished telling the story of ali he said : This is the best of what was said in the interpretation of this verse, which is the people of the investigation or authenticators among them the interpreters and scholars such as al zahri and kadi Bakr bin Alaa al-Qushiri, and kadi Abu Bakr Ibn al-Arabi and others as we can see in kortobi final conclusion the tabari version was flashed in toilet by scholars . now lets see what ibn kathir said concerning this affair . ibn kathir unlike kortobi refused even to mention one thing about the story which look like tabari version . he said in his book ibn Abi Hatim and Ibn Jarir mentioned here are some traces of some of the salaf (may Allaah be pleased with them). We loved to slap it ( meaning dismiss it ) because it was not correct or sahih , so we do not mention it. Imam Ahmad has also reported here a hadeeth from the hadeeth of Hammad ibn Zayd on the hadeeth of Anas (may Allaah be pleased with him), in which it was strange or weird hadith that we also left its context. now lets see jalalen jalelen said nothing at all concerning the story found in tabari version nor he used some of it . ibn al-Arabi said after mentioning the summary of these narrations, and showed the infallibility of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him): All these narrations are invalid.

@major7977

3 жыл бұрын

@@trustme7660 He got busted, Slow Thinker.

Yes, brother Wasim Ismail did a great job, and thank you brother for short and effective video. I personally always learn something about my Deen through bothers like you.

Jazak Allah Khair for this great refutation, it was much needed!

Wow! Thank you brother Farid for posting this! We have to be extremely careful on who's words we chose to listen to

Farid Bro it is good to hear you refuting both person. I request Yasir Qadhi to speak with our brother Farid and clear his stance about the issue which Farid raised. May Allah guide us, Yasir and David. Aameen.

Omg, farid you're amazing

@DrJames_YT

3 жыл бұрын

@@jerryosullivan6088 "soo many" there are thousands of shaih ahaidth you ignorant clown, but yall like to focus on weak ones, shows how desperate yall are.

@DrJames_YT

3 жыл бұрын

@Truth Speaker literally stated as weak, a fabricated lair and yall still this stupid, yall like to believe everything no wonder you're sad. That's not how it works in islam buddy, sorry to burst your bubbles kid

@DrJames_YT

3 жыл бұрын

@WAN MUHAMMAD SAFWAN BIN WAN MOHD NASHARUDIN Moe yup, because they are uneducated twats who like to cherry pick

@justamuslim836

3 жыл бұрын

Guys please Please Take it easy on them These are imam murrah students They belive our extremely old scholars traveled to the future looked at the arguments and wrote the hadeeths are weak

@hassanmuse5606

3 жыл бұрын

Mash'allah

Awesome explanation. I guess we need to make more research and im glad you put it easy for us to understand. Thank you for your effort

Jazakallahirkhair br Farid. Wasim 's video is amazing and well detailed may reward him with good abundantly.

I just notice something. According to his logic, Zaid married his aunt. Remember, Zainab and prophet Mohamed are cousins. Why he doesn't question that?

@murgamurgila9808

3 жыл бұрын

Because she is not his real aunt dumb 😡 the whole video was about this thing 😡

@ImamMurrahTheTimeTraveller

3 жыл бұрын

Good point!

@mohamedadan5120

3 жыл бұрын

@@murgamurgila9808 prophet Mohamed is not his real father too.

@murgamurgila9808

3 жыл бұрын

@@mohamedadan5120 i think we have another yasit qadhi in comments lol😂

@mohamedadan5120

3 жыл бұрын

@@murgamurgila9808 we play same team bro. You misunderstood my point.

Wait a minute... It isn’t woodnesday!

@lion_hawk

3 жыл бұрын

It's in Bahrain.

@quranpage-4479

3 жыл бұрын

@@lion_hawk yes I just checked

@major7977

3 жыл бұрын

@@quranpage-4479 It's in Pakistan too.

@grigorirasputin6443

3 жыл бұрын

It is in indonesia

@aboetarikske

3 жыл бұрын

Hammertime

This is why its important to take information in the Muslim world from those who have true knowledge

@FreePalestine_____

3 жыл бұрын

I wonder why Christians are even complaining about this issue! Bible says prophet Judah had an intercourse with his daughter in-law without marriage. Biological son's married wife !!!! -15 When Judah saw her, he thought she was a prostitute, for she had covered her face. 16 Not realizing that she was his daughter-in-law, he went over to her by the roadside and said, “Come now, let me sleep with you.”(Genesis 38:15-16)

@JohnDoe-od1pu

3 жыл бұрын

@@FreePalestine_____ Your argument makes no sense. The two cases are different, in the case of Judah he didn't know that was his daughter in law. In this case, the prophet knew and still had a relationship with her.

@FreePalestine_____

3 жыл бұрын

@@JohnDoe-od1pu Prophet married a divorced woman here. What's the issue? Judah did without even marriage.

@JohnDoe-od1pu

3 жыл бұрын

@@FreePalestine_____ She was his adopted son's wife. That's absolutely disgusting. I don't know why this even needs to be explained.

@FreePalestine_____

3 жыл бұрын

@@JohnDoe-od1pu She wasn't. She was a divorcee woman. Your divorced wife is not your wife anymore.

The Qur’an identifies the ruler of Egypt as “Pharaoh” sixty-five times, but only in the story of Moses (peace be upon him). Not a single time is Egypt’s earlier king during the time of Joseph (peace be upon him), called a “Pharaoh” in the Qur’an. This differs from the Old Testament which uses the label for both of these rulers (see: Genesis 40:7, 41:15/31/46, 50:7), though it has since been established that the term “Pharaoh” was first coined during the reign of Thutmose III (d. 1436 BC), the 18th dynasty of ancient Egypt.[16] Historians have further discovered that during the era of Joseph, the 15th to 17th dynasties of Egypt were an invading force from Palestine, and hence they were called the Hyksos (literally: foreign kings). Since “Pharaoh” meant “great house” or “elite bloodline,” and since the Hyksos were occupiers and not indigenous rulers, they were naturally ineligible for the honorific title-had it even existed.[17] Dr. Bucaille writes, I must confess that when the Qur’an was first being conveyed to people, the ancient Egyptian language had vanished from the collective memory of humanity for over two centuries, and remained that way until the nineteenth century. Therefore, it was impossible for us to know that the king of Egypt should be called anything other than the title mentioned in the Holy Bible. The subtle word choice of the Qur’an on this matter is thought-provoking.[18] The historical accuracy of the Qur’an is not just confirmed by recent archeological excavation; it astonished many early Jews and Christians just the same. The fact that Muhammad ﷺ could simply speak of personalities across different cultures like Abraham, Joseph, Moses, Jesus, Dhū al-Qarnayn, and others, with such detail was inexplicable. Similarly, the fact that he ﷺ could extensively illustrate scenes from the hereafter just as their earlier scriptures did was unbelievable for them, as Allah said, “Over it (Hellfire) are nineteen. And We have not made the keepers of the Hellfire but angels, and We have not made their number except as a trial for those who disbelieve (i.e., will they mock nineteen as few?), and so that those who were given the Scripture [prior] would be certain...” (74:31). Some Jews in Madīnah conceded that Muhammad ﷺ was, in fact, a true prophet, then resisted his message under the indefensible claim that it only applied to the Arabs. This was due to their inability to contest its divine origin, for they knew there was no access to any semblance of this history in the Arabic language whatsoever. As Allah says, “That is from the news of the unseen which We reveal to you, [O Muhammad]. You knew it not, neither you nor your people, before this” (11:49). Some of the toughest critics of the Qur’an today, like William Tisdall, confirm this: “There seems to be no satisfactory proof that an Arabic version of the New Testament existed in Muhammad’s time.”[19] In a similar vein, Pope Tawadrus II of Alexandria writes, “The first Arabic translation surfaced towards the end of the eighth Gregorian century and more than one hundred years after Islam. It was done by Bishop John of Seville in Spain. It was a partial translation that did not include the entire book, and was insufficiently circulated.”[20] As for the Torah, there is near consensus among Orientalist scholars that even incomplete translations of the Old Testament into Arabic did not exist until the 10th century.[21] Some detractors of Islam argue that none of this history is remarkable, let alone miraculous. They claim Muhammad ﷺ either learned these accounts directly from the mouths of his contemporaries or that he plagiarized them from manuscripts of the Bible that have since been lost. The accusation of being spoon-fed by others existed during the Prophet’s ﷺ life, but it quickly disappeared, and until today most serious Qur’an critics avoid citing such a ludicrous proposition because it risks their being perceived as desperate. First of all, this would be contrary to the historically indisputable integrity of Muhammad’s character. Secondly, the suggestions that Muhammad’s ﷺ knowledge of previous prophets and nations came from a Roman blacksmith in Mecca (a layman), or from a passing midday encounter with Baḥīrah the Monk, or to a single conversation with a dying Waraqah ibn Nawfal, are simply implausible. Sensible people realize that the bulk and veracity of what the Prophet ﷺ brought could only be attained with decades of apprenticeship that would be impossible for him to hide. “Say, ‘If Allah had willed, I would not have recited it to you, nor would He have made it known to you, for I had remained among you a lifetime before it. Then will you not reason?’” (10:16). As for the second accusation, that of plagiarism from the texts of Judeo-Christian scholars, only someone with a strong confirmation bias would consider this possibility, for two major reasons: As shown earlier, the Qur’an escapes the Bible’s minefield of historical inaccuracies unscathed. Therefore, in order for the unique Qur’anic narrative to be plagiarized from an earlier scripture, this would necessitate that the Prophet ﷺ somehow had access to the accurate version from the thousands of variant manuscripts. Moreover, this version would have existed only in 7th-century Arabia of all places, in a foreign language Muhammad ﷺ secretly learned, then vanished without a trace, never to be recovered again. Even if this bizarre hypothetical were true, it only accounts for the source of this incredible precision and ignores the miraculous nature of the end-product. The Qur’an responds to this notion, asserting, “And We certainly know that they say, ‘It is only a human being who teaches him [the Prophet].’ The tongue of the one they refer to is foreign, and this Qur’an is [in] a clear Arabic language” (16:103

@leen8212

3 жыл бұрын

Nice name, btw

@fcbkingmessi4664

3 жыл бұрын

Yes

@AC-mp7cx

3 жыл бұрын

@Allah need a wife to begot a son sister doesnt mean literal sister u idiot

@minecraftstation6422

3 жыл бұрын

@Allah need a wife to begot a son so by your logic brothers in faith are brothers biologically... And Egyptian christians who always say are the children of the messiah are they Rlly his children 🤦🏻‍♂️

@cure4islamophobia649

3 жыл бұрын

@Allah need a wife to begot a son how many times have you been refuted on this point if you believe in God Then fear the god and the judgement and stop lying

سبحان الله I remember I learned when I was nearly 17 in one of the small mosques in Egypt not to accept the narrations of alwaqedy 🙄 These guys are falling for simple basics 🙄

What a blessing that we know so much about our Prophet. No ambiguity. Alhumdulilah

Thank you brother for the video, I also watched Shamsi' explanation to someone in the park, wallahi I understand the importance scholars give to getting knowledge from the right sources and being careful regarding that, the comfort and peace brothers like you and Shamsi give me, is greatly appreciated may Allah reward you both plenty... Because wallahi though KZread made people like me who have no reach to Scholars nearby or in our city or country to go and ask such questions, it made it easier for us to search knowledge.. but it is also a dangerous tool because it gave platform to people who bring a lot of Shubuhat, which has led to misunderstanding of even principle and Aqeedah issues let alone specific issues like this. Again I am careful with whom I watch, at the moment it is brother Shamsi, You, Daniel Haqiqatju, and brother Akkari the 4 Dawah people I listen to, and I am happy and content with the knowledge / answers you guys put forward everytime..

Allahul mustaan, may Allah reward you brother Farid and guide Yasir qadhi and all of us.

Farid, you're awesome my man. 💯

Moral of the story: dr. YQ is as incompetent as dr.DW

@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543

3 жыл бұрын

@@trustme7660 you are mixing up Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings be upon him with the wanna be Prophet of Arabia paul who went to Arabia and then non tribesmen as if he was the Prophet of Isiah 42... when paul in acts 9 :3 saw the devil in luke 10, 18, and cancelled the commandments of JEsus...

@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543

3 жыл бұрын

@@trustme7660 actually its your paul who made Jesus a god against job 25 :4 which says God isn't from a womb & isiah 43 :10 that no new God forms, & he removed all commandments, showing he's lawless false Prophet of mathew 24 :11 & corrective comfortor to last forever like Quran in JOhn 16 : 8 is Muhammad peace and blessings be upon him, and even Jesus will per isiah 49 after leaving his tribe will follow light of nations of isiah 42 of Arabia...

@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543

3 жыл бұрын

@@trustme7660 who helped who out? esp. with evidence?

@fcbkingmessi4664

3 жыл бұрын

@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 I love you brother, do you have discord?

@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543

3 жыл бұрын

@@fcbkingmessi4664 Insha Allah!

It is really worth to watch your video. May Allah swt give you best in this Dunya and in the Hereafter. Brother You are really doing a great great job❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

One of your best videos JazakAllah khair

Happy 28k subscribes, Farid!

MashAllah brother Farid, you are doing a great job to debunk and expose such hateful people like D. Wood who are proactively spreading misconceptions about Islam.

Very beneficial brother Farid - jazakAllahu khair. Allah continue your efforts in sincerity and accept. Ameen.

Wallaahi the last minute of this video is all one needs to know in regards to Yasir. Clear and concise. BarakAllaahu Feek

Yasir Qadhi with his Yale PhD Degree, has become 'laysat lah silatan' = irrelevant; for Islam and Muslim

Whats more funny it's coming from a person who believe in a book says a righteous man slept with his own daughters and get them pregnant Genesis 19:30-38 30 Lot and his two daughters left Zoar(A) and settled in the mountains,(B) for he was afraid to stay in Zoar. He and his two daughters lived in a cave. 31 One day the older daughter said to the younger, “Our father is old, and there is no man around here to give us children-as is the custom all over the earth. 32 Let’s get our father to drink wine and then sleep with him and preserve our family line(C) through our father.”(D) 33 That night they got their father to drink wine, and the older daughter went in and slept with him. He was not aware of it when she lay down or when she got up.(E) 34 The next day the older daughter said to the younger, “Last night I slept with my father. Let’s get him to drink wine again tonight, and you go in and sleep with him so we can preserve our family line through our father.”(F) 35 So they got their father to drink wine(G) that night also, and the younger daughter went in and slept with him. Again he was not aware of it when she lay down or when she got up.(H) 36 So both of Lot’s daughters became pregnant by their father.(I) 37 The older daughter had a son, and she named him Moab[a];(J) he is the father of the Moabites(K) of today. 38 The younger daughter also had a son, and she named him Ben-Ammi[b]; he is the father of the Ammonites[c](L) of today.

@thehalalhipsterproductions5344

3 жыл бұрын

Brother, your intention is good and i appreciate it. I was disgusted when i first read these verses and i still am. But don't say their book says that the prophet made his daughters pregnant (intentionally). Instead, the daughters intoxicated him and they were to blame (according to the bible). I'm not saying you shouldn't use this verse against christianity, because this is a major blow to their perverse books. What i am saying is that refrain from using strawman arguments because then the christians can use this to make us look like we are twisting their scriptures. They lie like that! Hope you understand jazakallah khair

@dmx1339

3 жыл бұрын

You don’t get it . The bible records things as it is , not sugarcoating events just to “ prove “ a person is holy .Only Jesus was holy , for he did not sin . What the bible prescribes is different from what it describes. There are tons of people in the bible that have flaws. But they are not characters that Christians follow .That is why all have sin and fall short of the glory of God. That is why Jesus is the only way , truth and light . Only through Jesus is forgiveness achieved , sins are forgiven and we have a way to the Father .

@turkihazem

3 жыл бұрын

dmx Why would Jesus wants us to know incest stories, is he trying to say righteous man got drunk and had sex with his daughters so it's ok for us laymen to do it too? And how can a man practice incest and still righteous? That's explain why incest practiced more in Christian majority countries

@dmx1339

3 жыл бұрын

@Bink Bee Actually, you are assuming just because there is sin in the genealogy of Jesus, this discredits Jesus and God. When there is Sin in the presence of God, through God sacrifice ( Jesus death) , sins are forgiven. There is no power of Sin over God . You do know that Jesus was born of the virgin mary right ? He was God and man at the same time . Jesus came to conquer Sin and death. So even in the presence of sin, Jesus is triumphant , glorifying God .

@dmx1339

3 жыл бұрын

@@turkihazem Actually I am not even sure where you got the stats that incest is practice in Christian majority countries . Second , you assume that in this “ Christianity majority countries “ everyone practices christianity and believe in Jesus Christ . This is a false assumption. Also , as I have said earlier the bible mentions everything , good and bad to explain the fallenness of man. The bible doesn’t say that you should follow the actions of fallen people. The bible tells us to follow the actions of Jesus. Only he has no sin. Everyone has sin and fallen short of the glory of God ( Yes everyone!) Romans 3:23 Also , they bible doesn’t say that Lot was righteous. And even if it did , it doesn’t mean that Lot was holy and completely without sin.

Bro I appreciate u and your job

Allah hu Akbar! That is a great work my brother! May Allah preserve you and us. Ameen

Mashallah brother Farid you are doing such a great job to debunk and expose such people who are proactively spreading hate and misconceptions about Islam. May Allah (SWT) bless you with good health and long life.

These arguments are “strong”? I thought they were jokes and these people are comedians.

@abdelmajidtaouil5189

3 жыл бұрын

@@TheEric03041 hoax for your mind but not a hoax for the ones who studied their scienes. Now go to your Bible and try to figure out it's writers. Lol

@adamyahya9567

3 жыл бұрын

Eric Litho. Then why argue with them adjacent with Quran? You wouldn’t even know if what you’re using is weak or authentic given your claims.

@emaanserghini1919

3 жыл бұрын

So apparently it's OUR fault that David used fabricated and weak Hadiths to support his claims and mislead his followers, not THEIRS for listening to such a psychopath and gobbling up his lies like the half-wits they are.

@AN-io3mz

3 жыл бұрын

@@TheEric03041 “the science of hadith is a hoax” ah yes that’s what laymen disbelievers say when a Muslim refutes their whole point by pointing out the fake narration that they used. You guys cherry pick fabricated/weak hadiths then get mad at us for rejecting the them. I’m sorry but we Muslims are very strict when it comes to the authenticity and authority of narrations and narrators, that’s why our religion as a whole has been preserved (: Compare that with our Christian friends and they don’t even know who wrote their main holy book. How sad, but I understand your jealousy and frustration 😉 Now shou, get out of here with your baseless criticism of one of the most complex sciences which is for those who dedicate their entire lives for. We don’t need the opinion of a KZread troll from the 21st century. Who even are you

@shazam314

3 жыл бұрын

@Denzo Dridz You can't even find the concept of Trinity in the old testament.

Slaam brother thank you for explaining which is needed when you have so much people hating on Islam May Allah give you a long life and many more videos.

Farid You Class act 🔥🔥, I can't help but point out again that I love the new Farid Responds intro.

15:04 the difference in body language of Dr. Yasir Qadhi between the old and the new video is staggering.

Some Christians claim that the Quran has a scientific error in it regarding sperm production This is incorrect again. The critic focuses on the verses 86:6-7, especially verse 7 as this is where their contention is directed. The critic claims the Quran (86:7) is telling us that semen is produced between the backbone (sulb) and the ribs (tara’ib). The Arabic words mentioned by the Quran are sulb and tara’ib. Tara’ib is thought to mean ribs, though there is some dispute. However, the chief point of interest is the word sulb. Sulb can be translated as ‘loins’ or ‘backbone’ or ‘lower back’. The critic favours the translations which use the word ‘backbone’ as they use it to attack the Quran by claiming the Quran teaches that semen is produced between the backbone (sulb) and the ribs (tara’ib). However, the critic is very selective in deciding which translation to use as he/she avoids the numerous translations which translate ‘sulb’ as ‘loins’. They avoid these translations as they scupper their critical claims straight away as loins. Here, the word loins refers to: a. The region of the hips, groin, and lower abdomen. b. The reproductive organs. (1) So the critic refrains from using this translation for the word sulb as it is clearly scientifically accurate, ie the semen is produced in the are between the loins and ribs. So, if we translate the Quran (86:7) this way there is no contention. The misleading methodology of the critic is to avoid mention of the numerous translations which translate the word sulb as loins. Not only do they avoid mentioning the numerous translations using the word ‘loins’ they highlight translations which use the word ‘backbone’. This is rather deceptive, especially considering a number of non-Muslim translators, including a Christian translator, translates it as ‘loins’ ( A.J Arberry, George Sale, J.M Rodwell and Henry E Palmer) as well as a number of Muslim translators who also use the word loins (Hamid S Aziz, Muhammad M Ghali, Muhammad M Pickthall and Mohammad Asad) (4). It is unscholarly as well as misleading on the part of the critic not to mention this important fact. However, the critic does use Abdullah Yusuf Ali’s translation which translates it as ‘backbone’, therefore rendering a meaning of between the backbone and ribs. So the critic understands the Quran as teaching us that semen is produced between the backbone and ribs. In the way of intellectual honesty I do not want the reader to believe that only Abdullah Yusuf Ali translates this verse by using the word ‘backbone’, Shakir and Khan/Hilali also do this. The question still remains; which word should be used in the translation? Well, the critic does not tell you that Dr Edward William Lane’s Lexicon indicates the word sulb’ to mean ‘loins’ and even refers to the verse in question (86:7) as referring to the ‘loins’. So it does seem that the more accurate translation of this would be “between the loins and the ribs” as opposed to “between the backbone and the ribs” (4). Hence the critic uses the weaker translation. However, even if we assume the critic to be correct and take the translation; “between the backbone and the ribs” we still see no scientific error. The critic assumes that the ejaculate (semen) emanates from the testes, this is incorrect. Sperm is produced in the testes and is then transfered to the seminal vesicles awaiting ejaculation, the=is accounts for 5 % of the ejaculate, the rest of the ejaculate comes from the seminal vesicles (46-80%),with the prostate gland and the bulbourethral and urethral glands producing the rest of the ejaculate (2). At the time of ejaculation, all this (semen, which contains the sperm) is released From the seminal vesicles which are in fact between the backbone (coccyx, lower back) and the ribs! So if we run with the translation of the critics we see something that people would describe as a scientific miracle and not a scientific error. Osama Abdallah says the same thing but goes into a little more detail (bracketing is mine): “If one was to insist upon the literal meaning (the translation favoured by the critics), one would still find that the Quran is 100% correct literally, too. The seminal vesicles are anterior to the sacrum and coccyx (lower back, loin) and the ribs are anterior to the seminal vesicles. If one was to draw a line from the tip of the coccyx, to the upper portion of the seminal vesicle _ either one of the two_ and extend the line forward it will catch the ribcage.The seminal vesicles from which the semen spurts out during coitus, lies between the ribs and the coccyx (backbone)!” (3) The irony is that the critics accuse the Quran of making a scientific error yet the error is on their part as they only believe it to be an error as they wrongly believe semen emanates from the testes, while in fact in emanates from the seminal vesicles which are in between the backbone and the ribs! So now we all know the critics are being unfair, unscholarly and misleading when they claim the Quran (86:6-7) tells us that semen is produced in the kidneys etc.

@abuumaryam7970

3 жыл бұрын

Masha Allah

@halalparrot9352

3 жыл бұрын

You Just Could Have Said “The Sperm That Starts Creating The Human Body when he’s Inside His Mom Is Emerging from the back bone and ribs”

@cure4islamophobia649

3 жыл бұрын

@@halalparrot9352 contradictions in the Bible It is mentioned in the 2nd Kings, Chapter No.8, Verse No.26, it says that ‘Ahezia, he was 22 years old, when he began to reign.’ ­­­­­­2nd Chronicles, Chapter No. 22, Verse No. 2, says that… ‘He was 42 years old, when he began to reign.’ ­­­­­­Was he 22 years old, or was he 42 years old? - Mathematical contradiction. ­­­­­­Further more, in 2nd Chronicles, Chapter No. 21, Verse No. 20, it says that… ‘Joaram, the father of Ahezia, he reigned at the age of 32 - and he reigned for 8 years, and he died at the age of 40. ­­­­­Immediately… Ahezia became the next ruler at the age of 42. ­­­­­­ Father died at the age of 40 - Immediately son takes over, who is at the age of 42. ­­­­­­How can a son, be two years older than the father?’ ­­­­­­Believe me even… even in Hollywood film, you will not be able to produce it. ­­­­­ In Hollywood film, you can produce a ‘unicorn’ which I mentioned in my talk. ­­­­­­ Unicorn… you can have Coccrodyasis, which the Bible speaks about, Concrodyasis and dragons and serpents. ­­­­­­But in Hollywood you cannot even show a son, being two years older than the father. ­­­­­­It cannot even be a miracle - Even in miracles; it is not possible - Impossible. ­­­­­­In miracle, you can have a person being born of a virgin birth - but in miracle you cannot have a son being older than the father, by 2 years.­­­­­­ Further if you read - it is mentioned in the Bible, in 2nd Samuel Chapter No 24, Verse No 9, that… ‘The people that were involved in the battlefield. ­­­­­ It gives a list of these people, in 2nd Samuel, Chapter 24, Verse No. 9, and it says that… ‘People that took part 800 thousand of the men of Israel, took part - and 500 thousand of the men of Judah same.’ If you see other places, 1st Chronicle, Chapter 21, Verse No. 5, it says that… ‘1 million - Hundred thousand people took part in the battle field, from the men of Israel - and ten thousand four hundred and sixty men took part of Judah.’ ­­­­­­Was it 800 thousand people who took part from the men of Israel, or was it 1 million - 100 thousand? ­­­­­­ Was it 5 lakh people of Judah that took part or 10,460? ­­­­­­A clear-cut contradiction. Further more, it is mentioned in the Bible in 2nd Samuel, Chapter No. 6, Verse No 23, that… ‘Michael the daughter of Saul - she had no sons’ - 2nd Samuel’, Chapter 21, Verse No. 8… ‘Michael the daughter of Saul had 5 sons.’ ­­­­­­One place it says… ‘No children, no son, no daughter’ - Other place… ‘5 sons.’ ­­­­­­Further more if you read, it is mentioned in Gospel of Mathew, Chapter No. 1, Verse No. 16 - it says about the genealogy of Jesus Christ peace be upon him - as well as Luke Chapter No. 3, Verse No. 23, and it says that… Jesus’ father, that is Joseph - his father was Jacob’ - Mathew, Chapter 1, Verse 16. ­­­­­­And Luke, Chapter No 3, Verse No 23… Jesus’ father… Joseph - his father was Hailey. ­­­­­­Did Jesus’ father… Joseph, had two fathers ? ­­­­­­ What do you call a person who has got two fathers ? ­­­­­­Or was it Hailey - or was it Jacob ? ­­­­­­Clear-cut contradiction.

@halalparrot9352

3 жыл бұрын

@@cure4islamophobia649 I’m Muslim Bro I know It’s Not A Scientific Error The Fluid Ejected Is Emerging From The Back Bone When It’s Start Creating The Human Body However Look At My Favourite Story From The Bible Deuteronomy 28:20-50 *15 However, if you do not obey the Lord your God and do not carefully follow all his commands and decrees I am giving you today, all these curses will come on you and overtake you: 16 You will be cursed in the city and cursed in the country. 17 Your basket and your kneading trough will be cursed. 18 The fruit of your womb will be cursed, and the crops of your land, and the calves of your herds and the lambs of your flocks. 19 You will be cursed when you come in and cursed when you go out. 20 The Lord will send on you curses, confusion and rebuke in everything you put your hand to, until you are destroyed and come to sudden ruin because of the evil you have done in forsaking him.[a] 21 The Lord will plague you with diseases until he has destroyed you from the land you are entering to possess. 22 The Lord will strike you with wasting disease, with fever and inflammation, with scorching heat and drought, with blight and mildew, which will plague you until you perish. 23 The sky over your head will be bronze, the ground beneath you iron. 24 The Lord will turn the rain of your country into dust and powder; it will come down from the skies until you are destroyed. 25 The Lord will cause you to be defeated before your enemies. You will come at them from one direction but flee from them in seven, and you will become a thing of horror to all the kingdoms on earth. 26 Your carcasses will be food for all the birds and the wild animals, and there will be no one to frighten them away. 27 The Lord will afflict you with the boils of Egypt and with tumors, festering sores and the itch, from which you cannot be cured. 28 The Lord will afflict you with madness, blindness and confusion of mind. 29 At midday you will grope about like a blind person in the dark. You will be unsuccessful in everything you do; day after day you will be oppressed and robbed, with no one to rescue you. 30 You will be pledged to be married to a woman, but another will take her and rape her. You will build a house, but you will not live in it. You will plant a vineyard, but you will not even begin to enjoy its fruit. 31 Your ox will be slaughtered before your eyes, but you will eat none of it. Your donkey will be forcibly taken from you and will not be returned. Your sheep will be given to your enemies, and no one will rescue them. 32 Your sons and daughters will be given to another nation, and you will wear out your eyes watching for them day after day, powerless to lift a hand. 33 A people that you do not know will eat what your land and labor produce, and you will have nothing but cruel oppression all your days. 34 The sights you see will drive you mad. 35 The Lord will afflict your knees and legs with painful boils that cannot be cured, spreading from the soles of your feet to the top of your head. 36 The Lord will drive you and the king you set over you to a nation unknown to you or your ancestors. There you will worship other gods, gods of wood and stone. 37 You will become a thing of horror, a byword and an object of ridicule among all the peoples where the Lord will drive you. 38 You will sow much seed in the field but you will harvest little, because locusts will devour it. 39 You will plant vineyards and cultivate them but you will not drink the wine or gather the grapes, because worms will eat them. 40 You will have olive trees throughout your country but you will not use the oil, because the olives will drop off. 41 You will have sons and daughters but you will not keep them, because they will go into captivity. 42 Swarms of locusts will take over all your trees and the crops of your land. 43 The foreigners who reside among you will rise above you higher and higher, but you will sink lower and lower. 44 They will lend to you, but you will not lend to them. They will be the head, but you will be the tail. 45 All these curses will come on you. They will pursue you and overtake you until you are destroyed, because you did not obey the Lord your God and observe the commands and decrees he gave you. 46 They will be a sign and a wonder to you and your descendants forever. 47 Because you did not serve the Lord your God joyfully and gladly in the time of prosperity, 48 therefore in hunger and thirst, in nakedness and dire poverty, you will serve the enemies the Lord sends against you. He will put an iron yoke on your neck until he has destroyed you. 49 The Lord will bring a nation against you from far away, from the ends of the earth, like an eagle swooping down, a nation whose language you will not understand, 50 a fierce-looking nation without respect for the old or pity for the young. 51 They will devour the young of your livestock and the crops of your land until you are destroyed. They will leave you no grain, new wine or olive oil, nor any calves of your herds or lambs of your flocks until you are ruined. 52 They will lay siege to all the cities throughout your land until the high fortified walls in which you trust fall down. They will besiege all the cities throughout the land the Lord your God is giving you. 53 Because of the suffering your enemy will inflict on you during the siege, you will eat the fruit of the womb, the flesh of the sons and daughters the Lord your God has given you. 54 Even the most gentle and sensitive man among you will have no compassion on his own brother or the wife he loves or his surviving children, 55 and he will not give to one of them any of the flesh of his children that he is eating. It will be all he has left because of the suffering your enemy will inflict on you during the siege of all your cities. 56 The most gentle and sensitive woman among you-so sensitive and gentle that she would not venture to touch the ground with the sole of her foot-will begrudge the husband she loves and her own son or daughter 57 the afterbirth from her womb and the children she bears. For in her dire need she intends to eat them secretly because of the suffering your enemy will inflict on you during the siege of your cities. 58 If you do not carefully follow all the words of this law, which are written in this book, and do not revere this glorious and awesome name the lord Your God*

@ekkopoohbear9236

3 жыл бұрын

The prostate that contains the semen and the sperm that is located in the testes are nowhere near the location of between the ribs which is by the heart and the backbone. To try to use arabic translations is still used incorrectly and it shows how far the quran is reaching to try and not look foolish for that blunder

jazakallah khr brother Farid, I am liking this format of comparing what YQ said and where he got that from.

Great job on your channel keep it up

Thank you for putting Yasser in his place, Like you said the influence of someone like that is a lot greater than that of David wood.

@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543

3 жыл бұрын

Asalam aLeikum and Alhamdulilah, this is why the saalfi scholars say innovators are more dangerous they look like Muslims and then lie about Islam, sometimes unintentionally but in yasir's intentionally.

@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543

3 жыл бұрын

these are ppl who are ikwani, which is a sufi shia mason kawarij group... they sell out Islam and are too lazy to teach it... the founder of kawarij was thul kuwaisirah who argued with Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings on him about money, ppl need to learn history and expose these deviant groups!

Your emotionally adopted son .... Rizwan aaaaaaand jab 🤣🤣🤣, good one

جزاك الله خيرا اخي فريد

May Allah bless you and reward you brother Farid. KEEP ON REVEALING THE TRUTH

You are right about Yasir Qadhi. I have listened to all his seera and lives of the sahaba lectures. We need a proper Seera of our Prophet SAW in English. A complete Seera, in detail, can you point to one or maybe make a series of lectures. Its a big task but Insha Allah the reward will be even bigger

@Paper-Z

2 жыл бұрын

Check out Masjid Ribat or One message foundation Mufti menk also did a 29/30 episode ramadan series on it

DW is a compulsive lier. He needs weak of the weakest narration to fuel his sluggish mind and mislead his fans. His fans, BTW, don't care if someone is being honest or not as long as s/her is bashing Islam.

Keep up the good work brother.

May Allah increase you in knowledge and give you ranks among the messengers and the martyrs my brother

This guy Yasir makes my blood boil.......😡 he is a type of dayuth- without ghayrat......

@yes-wo7qn

3 жыл бұрын

Delete this comment

@yes-wo7qn

3 жыл бұрын

@9-11 is a Judeo PNAC inside job is he ikhwani? Also prove all that i want to learn more about that sect.

@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543

3 жыл бұрын

@@yes-wo7qn yes he is ikwani, I can also help you. ikwani means Brotherhood, the group from Egypt it formed in 1924 with money from british. it's founded by sufi mason hasan al banna. it was a reaction tot he fall of the Uthmani ottomons, but they reintroduced the same divisive ideas the split the Muslims called bida or chaning Islam, ISlam is complete, so if ppl keep changing it and everyone makes up their own lies about it then they divide and reunite on money... this is what happened in Turkey... the ikwanis are a reaction to their fail but follow their same mistakes... the founder hasan al banna i think had shia friends or family and shias also believe Quran is missing so they also make up lies... and again they dicide on religion and unite on money, they believed only they are true Muslims and they should fight everyone else... they inspired iran's cia 79 revolt the original jet bombers who took in exiled al queda... and they also inspired al queda too... Iran has a stamp of a guy names S qutub who said Islam should be like communism and push global revolts... this shows Islam is free from their ideas because they are too lazy to study and lie and keep trying to change it... some ppl say they aren't a sect but a group of corrupt sects like sufis and shias and kawarij and masons... but i think you get the picture... because they are masons, not all of the members know what others do, theres alot of secrecy, but Islam is an open and clear religion...

@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543

3 жыл бұрын

@@yes-wo7qn here watch this video : "Saudi Arabian Foreign Minister Rips Apart The Raafidhi Majoosi Iranian Foreign Minister " if you want a site to learn about bad sects, go to Salaf(dot)com and go to the bottom of the page! and then click on what group you want to learn about! - they do good work!

@TheGOAT-dr1sq

2 жыл бұрын

Yes he is a dayooth he speaks abt his own Nabi and Mother in such a nasty way and he isn’t ashamed

This lust story is a LIE. its also illogical. The prophet persuaded her to marry zayd, she and her family were against it. And the prophet was the first cousin of zaynab, he saw her her whole life without hijab, hijab was revealed after her marriage to the prophet. I'm not denying that zaynab is a beautiful woman. I know she is, she is one of the most beautiful woman in arabia.

@FreePalestine_____

3 жыл бұрын

I wonder why Christians are even complaining about this issue! Bible says prophet Judah had intercourse with his daughter in-law without marriage. Biological son's wife. -15 When Judah saw her, he thought she was a prostitute, for she had covered her face. 16 Not realizing that she was his daughter-in-law, he went over to her by the roadside and said, “Come now, let me sleep with you.”(Genesis 38:15-16)

@lovegod9681

3 жыл бұрын

@@FreePalestine_____ Did prophet Muhammad used to have sexual intercourse with and have intimacy with Zaynab? YES he did. But so what?? He married her first when she was free. He didn't just sleep with her without marriage Zaynab was his FIRST cousin and he was the one who PERSUADED her to marry Zayd! I'm not denying that Zaynab is a beautiful woman. She is. She is one of the most beautiful Arab women of all time.

Allah y jazik belkhayr wa rbah fi dunya wa al akhira ya akhi shaqeeq (ameen). I cannot express in words my eternal gratitude for you sharing your islamic knowlegde with the rest of the world and countering malicious falsehood (concerning our deen and beloved prophet with authentic sources) which is being presented as so called academic truth by esteemed and respected individuals staghfiru'Allah. May Allah be your best friend in the dunya and the akhira (ameen). May Allah bless you and safeguard you from all evil and waswas (ameen). The path to knowlegde is truly a road which oneself has to undertake and not just seeking wisdom from hear say. Thank you brother Farid for highlighting this in our era where knowlegde is so easily accessible for oneself but laziness, ego, fanboyism and blatantly proud ignorance have creeped into the hearts of the ummah.

بارك الله فيكم... اللهم اغفر لوالدينا و ارحمهما و اجمعنا معهما في الفردوس الأعلى مع الأنبياء و الشهداء و الصالحين و جميع موتى المسلمين.. اللهم احقن دماء المسلمين و انصرهم على من عاداهم.. رب إني مسني الضر و أنت أرحم الراحمين... لا إله إلا أنت سبحانك إني كنت من الظالمين..... .''''''' ................ ... . . . .....

Brilliant, yasir qadhi can make mistakes as well. Subhanallah

Is it only me or I find yasir qadhi intentionally finds these kinds of topic and try to provide different interpretations than the orthodox one just to make himself stand out, really feel it makes him think he is someone big

@shawnkay5462

2 жыл бұрын

%100

May Allah Bless you with the best of both worlds. May Allah fill your house with barakah. And always keep you happy. Aameen

JazakAllah khair akhi

Why is Yasir talking about integrity? 😂😂

I fear the Shubuhat of Yasir Qadhi .. more troubling than islamophobes

@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543

3 жыл бұрын

and the funny thiing is even Muslim laymen can refute his lies that have some exp. not all but some, this shows his arrogance nullifies his knowledge. May Allah protect us!

Jazakallah khairan akhi... Seriously not surprised with YQ's wanton ignorance or even malicious machinations...May ALLAH SWT guide him

I love this series. This series is very underrated. People are complaining about david wood. We should share this playlist of david woods refutation to them.

"His Own adopted son"..... I don't think this actually makes some.

The signs that prove the prophecy of Muhammad are numerous. Many books have been written to enumerate them and thoroughly discuss them. We would like to mention some of these signs as reported by Muslim scholars and which prove that Muhammad  was a real Prophet including: - First, his good biography and high morals as well as the noble qualities that distinguished him. He was known before becoming a Prophet as a truthful and honest person, although the community where he lived was a society of ignorance. This was, perhaps, the most important sign of his prophecy. He was not known to have ever lied on people. So, why should he lie on be half of the Lord by claiming that he was a Prophet, if he was not a real Prophet? - Second, the powers and triumphs Allah gave him and the spread of the religion he preached, as well as the triumph of this religion over all existing religions in a short period of time. Had he been a liar, Allah would have humiliated and destroyed him as He did with those before him who falsely claimed Prophethood. - Third, the miracles Allah gave him as supporting evidence were beyond the ability of human beings and were beyond range of natural phenomena. The moon split for him, water gushed from his fingers, food became more abundant in his hands, and similar phenomena were authentically reported and happened in a way that could not be denied. - Fourth, the Prophet  was backed by the greatest miracle which is the Quran. In fact, Quran was a challenge and remains a challenge for Arabs who were known to be good poets and eloquent speakers. Allah challenged them to write a single Surah (chapter) that would be similar to that of Quran, but the Arabs were unable to do so. Indeed, the challenge still endures, none of the Arabs throughout history - since the revelation of the Quran - was able to make anything that was even similar to it. No doubt that the Quran has been preserved intact until it came to us. Groups of people memorized it including children, adults, males and females. So generations brought the Quran to generations until it reached us as it was revealed 14 centuries ago. Hence, the Quran remains intact protected from distortion or alteration. Nothing has been added to it, nor taken from it. Quran is full of scientific facts that were verified only in these times of scientific investigation. No doubt that Muhammad who was illiterate would not have possessed this knowledge 14 centuries ago. Doesn't this prove the authenticity of the Quran and that it is the Word of the Creator of the Universe who knows all its secrets? - Fifth, the things from the unseen that he (the Prophet ) informed us about. Some of them occurred during his life time. Others happened later. Some of these things happened to the Prophets, may Allah exalt their mention, who preceded him and some are still to occur. He also informed about the signs of The Day of Judgment, some of which had already been seen such as widespread killings and genocide, adultery and fornication and the consumption of the alcohol, outnumbering of males by females and the increased number of earthquakes, and afflictions,… etc. - Sixth, the testimony of some of the people of the Book that he was a true Prophet. Some of them believed in him like 'Abdullah Ibn Salam  who was a Jew as well as Negus (king of Abyssinia) who was a Christian. Some of the people of the Book certified that he was a Prophet from Allah but refused to follow him like Huyayy Ibn Akhtab. The above are some of the signs that prove his Prophethood and the authenticity of his revelations. We would like the questioner to visit some of the Islamic centers in her area, and hopefully, they will guide her to some useful references in the matter.

@SAADOFFICIAL436

3 жыл бұрын

Ye 😎

@SAADOFFICIAL436

3 жыл бұрын

@Jahbah X Allah has 3 daughters that's all you've got pagan biach🤣🤣🤣🤣 What if you could have read two more next verses i.e. 22 and 23 of the referred Sura 53. In Surah 53:19-21 Allah has raised questions/objection (in respect to the malpractices at that time 1. appointing more gods other than one Almighty 2. burring alive the female child in the ground in the name of god) and He (Allah) Himself gives the answer to these questions in Verse 22-23 19 Have you considered al-Lat and al-Uzza? 20 And Manat, the third one, the other? 21 Are you to have the males, and He the females? 22 What a bizarre distribution. 23 These (al-Lat and al-Uzza And Manat) are nothing but names, which you have devised, you and your ancestors, for which Allah sent down no authority. They follow nothing but assumptions, and what the ego desires, even though guidance has come to them from their Lord. Conclusion: 1) Don't be an idiot to Jump to the conclusion too early 2) Don't waste my time pagan 🤣

@quintuslentulus6183

3 жыл бұрын

Didn't Muhammad think he was possessed by satan when he received his first revelation and was so depressed that he tried to kill himself by jumping off a cliff? ( Sahih Bukhari 6982) . How can a true prophet try to commit suicide and not know the difference between angel from God and satan?

@cure4islamophobia649

3 жыл бұрын

@@quintuslentulus6183 didn't the devil take JESUS for a Ride

@quintuslentulus6183

3 жыл бұрын

@@cure4islamophobia649 IS that all you have to say in defense of Muhammad? You just going to ignore the hadith that supports my claim? Jesus was tempted by satan, but Jesus knew who satan was and satan knew who Jesus was. When he was tempted by satan he responded ‘Do not put the Lord your God to the test.(Matthew 4:7) Which God is Jesus here talking about if satan is testing Jesus? Please address or deny hadith or Ibn Ishaq I've quoted, and prove Muhammad wasn't suicidal and didn't want to kill himself and knew the difference between a revelation from God and a revelation from satan. If you can't , you should leave Islam.

Baarakallaahu fiik brother..

جراك الله خيرا. والله انها فتن كقطع الليل المظلم اللهم ثبت قلوبنا علب دينك

Yare yare daze Mashallah Farid 😍

Honestly akhi, if you did listen to the entire lecture, he was giving all of the different schools of thought on the issue and was only teaching the different views that scholars hold, on the matter. May Allah guide us.

Nice brother good job may allah reward you paradise and guide us and them all ! By the way you look like a moroccan youtuber called : skowza

@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543

3 жыл бұрын

capitalize A in Allah.

May Allah reward you

Lumbing in Yasir Qadhi with David Wood? Not cool bro. Not cool at all. He's still you're Muslim brother regardless of any differences you have with him.

@tayloryoung4974

3 жыл бұрын

YQ🤝islamophobes

@abhmd4481

3 жыл бұрын

Tell that to Yasir, ask Yasir to stop waffling

@osumanaaa9982

3 жыл бұрын

YQ has been screwing up a lot and that's bad given his position. He is known as a scholar, so a person we are supposed to learn some things from, but he: - Used Shia fabricated sources during one lecture - Used fabricated hadiths like in this video - Made a vague claim about the Quran that Christian haters use as a reference against Islam quoting him as a "famous Muslim scholar" So I'm sorry but if he keeps screwing up like that, he should stop giving lectures or have them double checked by other scholars.

@emaanserghini1919

3 жыл бұрын

All of what you guys mentioned still does not justify such an action.

@osumanaaa9982

3 жыл бұрын

@@emaanserghini1919 You mean no one should point out his mistakes? Especially when he makes very risky claims saying scholars sanitized hadiths that are actually fabricated

Why does YQ look like he's possessed in the thumbnail lol.

@amnah1520

3 жыл бұрын

Coz he is

@foxsan8136

3 жыл бұрын

LOL

@lail111

3 жыл бұрын

😂 I was thinking the same thing he does look possessed.

@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543

3 жыл бұрын

@@amnah1520 May Allah protect us, we should still be kind and pray Allah guides him and ppl away from him until he repents.

I love how David wood points out that this verse is so important it had to be stated. meanwhile jesus never once thought it important enough to say he was God. the irony.

Masha'Allah great work

Quranic Teachings about Satan and about Morality Some claim that the Quran was the work of the devil.[1] Let us examine how much sense (or non-sense) this allegation makes. If he authored or inspired the Quran, why would Satan curse himself and call himself the worst enemy of man (Q.35:6; 36:60)? Why would Satan command that before reciting the Quran, one must first say: “…I seek refuge in God from Satan the accursed.” (Quran 16:98) How could Satan so vehemently condemn himself? Is it really acceptable to common sense to hold the view that Satan would ask people to do good, to be moral and virtuous, to worship none but God, to not follow Satan or his whispers, and to avoid and struggle against evil? To hold such a view is clearly repugnant to reason, as Satan has only undermined himself through this means if he is the author. Even the Bible attests: “And if Satan has risen up against himself and is divided, he cannot stand, but is coming to an end.” (Mark 3:26)[2] This argument applies to any “Satanic forces”, be they “evil spirits”, “deceitful aliens”, etc

@quintuslentulus6183

3 жыл бұрын

I wonder why Muhammad himself admitted once that he delivered verses from Satan? Here's the story, according to Ibn Ishaq's Sirat Rasul Allah ( earliest biographical source on Muhammad): Now the apostle was anxious for the welfare of his people, wishing to attract them as far as he could. . . . When the apostle saw that his people turned their backs on him and he was pained by their estrangement from what he brought them from God he longed that there should come to him from God a message that would reconcile his people to him. Because of his love for his people and his anxiety over them it would delight him if the obstacle that made his task so difficult could be removed. . . . Then God sent down "By the star when it sets your comrade errs not and is not deceived, he speaks not from his own desire," and when he reached His words "Have you thought of al-Lat and al-Uzza and Manat the third, the other", Satan, when he was meditating upon it, and desiring to bring it to his people, put upon his tongue "these are the exalted Gharaniq [Numidian cranes] whose intercession is approved." When the Quraysh heard that, they were delighted and greatly pleased at the way in which he spoke of their gods and they listened to him; while the believers were holding that what their prophet brought them from their Lord was true, not suspecting a mistake or a vain desire or a slip, and when he reached the prostration and the end of the Sura in which he prostrated himself the Muslims prostrated themselves when their prophet prostrated confirming what he brought and obeying his command, and the polytheists of Quraysh and others who were in the mosque prostrated when they heard the mention of their gods, so that everyone in the mosque believer and unbeliever prostrated . . . Then the people dispersed and the Quraysh went out, delighted at what had been said about their gods, saying, "Muhammad has spoken of our gods in splendid fashion. He alleged in what he read that they are the exalted Gharaniq whose intercession is approved." The news reached the prophet’s companions who were in Abyssinia, it being reported that Quraysh had accepted Islam, so some men started to return while others remained behind. Then Gabriel came to the apostle and said, "What have you done, Muhammad? You have read to these people something I did not bring you from God and you have said what He did not say to you." The apostle was bitterly grieved and was greatly in fear of God. So God sent down (a revelation), for He was merciful to him, comforting him and making light of the affair and telling him that every prophet and apostle before him desired as he desired and wanted what he wanted and Satan interjected something into his desires as he had on his tongue. So God annulled what Satan had suggested and God established His verses, i.e. you are just like the prophets and apostles. Then God sent down: "We have not sent a prophet or apostle before you but when he longed Satan cast suggestions in his longing. But God will annul what Satan has suggested. Then God will establish his verses, God being knowing and wise." (Ibn Ishaq, pp. 165-166)

Official written copy by Uthman The Quran was originally revealed in Quraishi dialect of Arabic. But to facilitate the people who speak other dialects, in their understanding and comprehension, Allah revealed the Quran finally in seven dialects of Arabic. During the period of Caliph Uthman (third successor to the Prophet) differences in reading the Quran among the various tribes became obvious, due to the various dialectical recitations. Dispute was arising, with each tribe calling its recitation as the correct one. This alarmed Uthman, who made an official copy in the Quraishi dialect, the dialect in which the Quran was revealed to the Prophet and was memorized by his companions. Thus this compilation by Uthman's Committee is not a different version of the Quran (like the Biblical versions) but the same original revelation given to the Prophet by One God, Allah. Narrated Anas bin Malik: Hudhaifa bin Al-Yaman came to Uthman at the time when the people of Sham (Syria) and the people of Iraq were waging war to conquer Armenia and Azherbijan. Hudhaifa was afraid of their differences in the recitation of the Quran, so he said to Uthman, 'O chief of the Believers! Save this nation before they differ about the Book (Quran) as Jews and Christians did before'. So Uthman sent a message to Hafsa saying, 'Send us the manuscripts of the Quran so that we may compile the Quranic materials in perfect copies and return the manuscripts to you'. Hafsa sent it to Uthman. 'Uthman then ordered Zaid bin Thabit, 'Abdullah bin Az-Zubair, Said bin Al-As and Abdur Rahman bin Harith bin Hisham to rewrite the manuscripts in perfect copies. Uthman said to the three Quraishi men, 'In case you disagree with Zaid bin Thabit on any point in the Quran, then write it in their (Quraishi) tongue'. They did so, and when they had written many copies, Uthman sent to every Muslim province one copy of what they had copied and ordered that all the other Quranic materials whether written in fragmentary manuscripts or whole copies, be burnt…" [29] Again a very stringent criteria was set up by this Committee to prevent any alteration of the Revelation. 1. The earlier recension (Original copy prepared by Abu Bakr) was to serve as the principal basis of the new one. [30] 2. Any doubt that might be raised as to the phrasing of a particular passage in the written text was to be dispelled by summoning persons known to have learned the passage in question from the Prophet. [31] 3. Uthman himself was to supervise the work of the Council. [32] When the final recension was completed, Uthman sent a copy of it to each of the major cities of Makka, Damascus, Kufa, Basra and Madina. The action of Uthman to burn the other copies besides the final recension, though obviously drastic, was for the betterment and harmony of the whole community and was unanimously approved by the Companions of the Prophet. Zaid ibn Thabit is reported to have said: "I saw the Companions of Muhammad (going about) saying, 'By God, Uthman has done well! By God, Uthman has done well!" [33] Another esteemed Companion Musab ibn Sad ibn Abi Waqqas said: "I saw the people assemble in large number at Uthman's burning of the prescribed copies (of the Quran), and they were all pleased with his action; not a one spoke out against him". [34] Ali ibn Abu Talib, the cousin of the Prophet and the fourth successor to the Prophet commented: "If I were in command in place of Uthman, I would have done the same". [35] Of the copies made by Uthman, two still exist to our day. One is in the city of Tashkent, (Uzbekistan) and the second one is in Istanbul (Turkey). Below is a brief account of both these copies: 1. The copy which Uthman sent to Madina was reportedly removed by the Turkish authorities to Istanbul, from where it came to Berlin during World War I. The Treaty of Versailles, which concluded World War I, contains the following clause: 'Article 246: Within six months from the coming into force of the present Treaty, Germany will restore to His Majesty, King of Hedjaz, the original Koran of Caliph Othman, which was removed from Madina by the Turkish authorities and is stated to have been presented to the ex-Emperor William II". [36] 'This manuscript then reached Istanbul, but not Madina (Where it now resides)'. [37] 2. The second copy in existence is kept in Tashkent, Uzbekistan. 'It may be the Imam (master) manuscript or one of the other copies made at the time of Uthman'. [38] It Came to Samarkand in 890 Hijra (1485) and remained there till 1868. Then it was taken to St.Petersburg by the Russians in 1869. It remained there till 1917. A Russian orientalist gave a detailed description of it, saying that many pages were damaged and some were missing. A facsimile, some 50 copies, of this mushaf (copy) was produced by S.Pisareff in 1905. A copy was sent to the Ottoman Sultan 'Abdul Hamid, to the Shah of Iran, to the Amir of Bukhara, to Afghanistan, to Fas and some important Muslim personalities. One copy is now in the Columbia University Library (U.S.A.). [39] 'The Manuscript was afterwards returned to its former place and reached Tashkent in 1924, where it has remained since'. [40]

@swabiram5624

3 жыл бұрын

Excuse me sir. I have a doubt regarding a hadith in sayihul buk...no:5105. The matter is that the hadees says about permission to a man to marry a women whose son is homosexualised by that man. Can u pls explain the context of this hadees. Because critisisers like dovid19 (David wood) was playing with this hadees and it seems that Farid did not put a video on this topic.

@syedmujtabaali5769

3 жыл бұрын

@@swabiram5624 Peace be upon you Lol dovid 19 Anyway in Hadith it say if man commit homosexuality with a boy then his mother is unlawful to him I don’t see any problem with that

@swabiram5624

3 жыл бұрын

@@syedmujtabaali5769 the matter is that the man should be killed actually according to islamic sharia becoz of adultry. So where is the point of marriying the boy's mother afterall he is dead after that punishment . So this hadees has some another context and i think Farid is not aware of this hadees .iam searching for the context and asking many friends and preachers but none of them responded. How can i report this prblm to Farid directly?can u pls report to farid this issue or tell me any way so that i can report to him.😊

@swabiram5624

3 жыл бұрын

@Uncle KFC ok.thanks

@swabiram5624

3 жыл бұрын

@Uncle KFC yes sir

Is there a book that goes in depth about clearing the misconceptions about islam. (in english please). I'm open to recommendations.

جزاكم الله خيرا

Yasir Qadhi 🤝 Islamophobes, hand in hand.

When I saw you were going after YQ again, tbh I was a bit annoyed thinking you need to leave him alone. But this video justified it.

@safiasaleh7322

3 жыл бұрын

YQ is disgusting and is lying here. How can he use discredited sources. Farid needs to refute him. He is a danger to Muslims who follow him blindly. How can anyone listen to his deviant views that will mislead Muslims who are lay people

@husseinkhafadji7352

3 жыл бұрын

Bro look at his series at answering questions and tell me if his views are valid

Let David Wood first defend what he believes one of his prophets did with his biological daughters according to the bible before he speaks about our prophet.

اخى فرىد you're a legend 🙌 👏

I have a question why do we still keep fabricated hadiths?

@tayloryoung4974

3 жыл бұрын

Why does a scientist keeps logs of his failed experiments

@Soyodi

3 жыл бұрын

@@tayloryoung4974 I understand your analogy but it doesn't/shouldn't apply to hadiths. Because we are not 'testing' anything (although there's science behind hadiths) until we have the final conclusion. Because we already know what hadiths are reliable by the grading system. If a hadith is fabricated, we don't refer to it so why keep it at all.

@Soyodi

3 жыл бұрын

@Abdul-Haqq JazkaAllah. I have understood better now.

@jerryosullivan6088

3 жыл бұрын

Should burn them , like all the different korans utman burned

@Soyodi

3 жыл бұрын

@@jerryosullivan6088 Its alright I have it memorised :)

Yasir, it's 'sal Allahu alaihi wa salam' not 'Sasam'.

@piscagherila9981

3 жыл бұрын

*Slslm

Farid, Can you help us as to which hadith we need to use for Quran references?

You are doing amazing work! These people have got nothing to do in their lives. It would have been better for them (wood and people like him out there) that they stand for something and support that and then put on youtube. But they don't have guts to do that so they just know what to oppose instead of what to support and put this stuff. What a useless goal they have in their lives. A total waste of their every living day!

1:49 in farid talks about someone who didn't witness an event as being "a weak point"... Wow, farid here is asserting if anyone did not personally witness something, then it should be discarded as he claims its "weak".. Are you 1400 yrs old farid ???????? Did you witness the moon split in 2 ? Did you witness any miracles ? I guess that means, the words you utter should be discarded according to your own mindset 🤫

@paul512bmi

3 жыл бұрын

Its noticed that farid has not responded to this, because it exposes a huge flaw in his thinking, cmon farid, aren't you a self proclaimed expert that people look up to ? How do think this looks if you are incapable of addressing my simple criticism of what you said ??

@mindlessprocrastination6630

3 жыл бұрын

He doesn't even need to reply, since your questions speak more of your ignorance rather than a criticism of Farid. Please research the science of hadith to understand what a weak hadith is.

@abhmd4481

3 жыл бұрын

That's not what he said dummy, he's talking about the first narrator of the chain, and not the person who recorded it, your argument would've been valid if he said that about Al-Tabari 🤣

@paul512bmi

3 жыл бұрын

@@abhmd4481 Nope, he made a statement and my observation stands. You're wrong.

What is wrong with Yasir Qadhi?

@SR-hu7qr

3 жыл бұрын

He just speak sense

The man abu lahab was the first to oppose the prophet and spread lies about him and we all know what happened to him and inshallah it will happen to all who spread lies about him in this world and in this hereafter.

Assalamualaikum brother. Can you please give us the real story behind the prophet A.S and Zainab R.A wedding