Devdutta is so imaginative that he writes his own mythology. Hence he can be intriguing to some naive novices.

@abhihsekb6841

10 ай бұрын

ha ha

@rahulvartak410

10 ай бұрын

:-)

@sundareshanal1849

10 ай бұрын

In fact he has been exposed for his false translations and outright mischief.

@vineetrodge4099

10 ай бұрын

He spoke many times that others are fool & he is only educated.

@jai6196

10 ай бұрын

He just kept on throwing words Brahmin, Brahminical, Caste, untouchability etc and then called himself a scholar 😂

Wow.. heard Devdutt Pattanaik sir for the first time!! He's brilliantly PATHETIC! 🎉👏

@Arthur-od9wz

10 ай бұрын

u got us on the first half not gonna lie🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

@CaptSBTyagi

10 ай бұрын

😂 You got it mate!😂 This Devdutt is farzi, fake, nakli. He is forwarding his coomi agenda.

@shivajiaware2123

10 ай бұрын

Good teaching to Dalal Rahul

@nit23sharma

3 күн бұрын

He is a mealy mouth chewtiya

1) "Brahmin controlled history" 2) "Aryan came from outside" 3) "horses came from outside" 4) "Sita was kept inside house " 5) "we hate plurality for purity" This pattnaik guy is killing me now 😀

@harishkiran3663

10 ай бұрын

When pappu becomes a writer, we get DP😂🤣

@deshbhaktstri

10 ай бұрын

And malech means dirty, chota😂 in reality malech means outsider 😊

@FnmsF

10 ай бұрын

@@deshbhaktstri any foreigner that stood outside the caste system and the ritual ambience. courtesy wiki. so any one out the higher caste is referred as malecha in the brahminical world order.

@ashishcodanda6572

10 ай бұрын

🤣🎯✅️🤷

@harishkiran3663

10 ай бұрын

@@deshbhaktstri Mlecha means one who is without Dharma.

Devdutt continuously used the word, "Brahmanical" to point out that Chanakya's irony is that Chanakya helps in uniting the Country by nurturing a non-Bramhin king. Useless to call such people who openly call themselves mythological, which was actually our History.

@fiction1795

10 ай бұрын

Yes this man is actually a Dumbdutt

@sundareshanal1849

10 ай бұрын

Devdutt's double speak and hypocrisy has been brutally exposed by people like Nityanand Misra, Rajiv Malhotraji. This man was teaming up the radical left wing , global Hindu bashers and pretended to be part of our pantheon The book on the Ten Ravanas by Infinity Foundation laid bare these intellectual crooks.

@Cnu684

10 ай бұрын

Very true… such fellows who wants only publicity to sell his fiction books

@animeshpanda

10 ай бұрын

exactly. what is not healthy is this guys detest of "brahmans". why does india today interview such casteist hatemongers. were vedas not written by brahmans ? were any other scripture not written by them? if india comes from sindhu better to call Sindhia right ? but mr. pattnaik will say NO, greek mispronunciation is right. pathetic.

@rashmichaturvedi3836

10 ай бұрын

Agree 1000👍

In such an important matter, Devdutt Pattnaik lied through his teeth. Check his financial records to see who funds him. The keys should be thrown away if he is found guilty.

@sarojadhikari8868

10 ай бұрын

Sanjib Sanyal is a RSS ideologue, so he will propagate his own idejology.

@chanduji2855

10 ай бұрын

Who funds him? Open society? Bil Milinda gates foundation?

@dr_mridul_sharma

10 ай бұрын

​@sarojadhikari8868 but does his statement correlates with facts??? Yess So, he may be rss ideologue but he stands. Correct 😊

@shivanandtripathi7821

10 ай бұрын

@@sarojadhikari8868 counter on facts buddy.

@rakshithgowda2048

10 ай бұрын

​​@@sarojadhikari8868having d same ideology doesn't change d facts... He gives facts and his argument is always backed by facts... Y is rss ideology or rss way of thinking so bad... R they terrorists?? 😂😂😂

Sanjeev sanyal sir…. Thank you for such a marvellous explanation… Jai Hind

What a difference between the two guests... Sanjeev Sanyal is a gem

@gauravdey4163

10 ай бұрын

Ya because it's suits bjp

This Devdutt is a class act. First he gives a Grade 5 labored history lecture in the etymology of the word India. Then he goes on to say essentially that everything from outside is good, but a word/name from inside the country even if a part of the country - is bad - and we are all small people to want a name that originates from within the land. Furthermore, his anti Hindu and anti Brahaminical bias and pure hate is not even couched, while he calls others political. Class act indeed.

@watchtv6911

10 ай бұрын

He didn’t even know the Sanskrit roots of Bharat.

@watchtv6911

10 ай бұрын

Please don’t call Devdutt again. He needs a non- colonial education! There is a reason we do not teach such distorted history in schools. 👎

@ssrivastava3

10 ай бұрын

Well, this joker is the product of an unknown father, and that too of foreign heritage. I could have used a single word to describe this joker / character, but that would have been uncivil.

@bvsp697

10 ай бұрын

Arya aryavartas aryans dravidians. North indians south indians. This is the history written by foriegners whose policy is to divide and rule. From himalayas to kanyakumari same vedas and veda mantras are followed. Same ramayana and mahabharatha. Vishnu shiva bramha are also same for entire bharat. Puranas are same. Ashtakshari panchakshari are same. This is the real history of bharat. over a period of time practices may have some difference. This is santhana dharma. This is making us unity in diversity. Dont fall prey to westerners written history. In schools we are thaught that. We believe that it is true. But that is not our real history. Some one outside comes and say this is epic and we accept that. It is slavery. For outsider who is a hypocrite we dont have to prove that it happened. Vedas puranas sanathana darma are our identity. Our history started when paramatma started creation. That is our unity in diversity. This is Bharat.

@nitin1240

10 ай бұрын

That $¢umbag Danavdutt is a known current time Deep State narrative constructor to brainwash contemporary generation.

Very confused Pattnaik. Waffling his way through. Can he even hear himself - as his every sentence contradicts his previous ones? Bravo Mr Sanyal.

@rumadadarkar5325

10 ай бұрын

He sounded confused and does not have any knowledge

@maloo9898

10 ай бұрын

How can he hear himself when he is sooo focussed on how he sounds? The brain is muddled. Somebody please tell him he doesnt need to try and sound husky in order to seem authentic. He can just get a backbone and talk about facts clearly and people will listen.

Devdutt was creating a split by saying brahminical, south and north indian, arian. He himself admitted that India name was coined by external people. Bharath is the word used in the Vedas as well to describe our geography. Sanjeev put everything in right perspective. Ya, wondering what is there to debate. Both names are acceptable

@alani3992

10 ай бұрын

India is a geography. Bharat is a religio-cultural term. Even the biggest king Ashoka never used the term Bharat.

@Akash-tl6rm

10 ай бұрын

@@alani3992 Geography is an objective construct devoid of values and identity. A nation's roots are to be traced to heritage and cultural moorings on which it is built upon. Asoka using or not using the term is immaterial when there are enough pre-Mauryan texts like Vishnupuran and Mahabharat mentions Bharata.

@ronarona4329

10 ай бұрын

He is not creating a split He was talking about a split which was there in our old times And some of us don’t want to hear harsh truths

@ubtr9n805

10 ай бұрын

@@ronarona4329 he is indeed doing that. In the name Bharat where is brahminical coming and Aryan invasion theory is proven to be bogus. Still he wants to put across those irrelevant points to instigate people not to accept the name.

@ronarona4329

10 ай бұрын

@@ubtr9n805 Aryan invasion is not bogus I don’t know from where u got that info. Brahmanical hegemony is a true thing How can u defend that It is the fundamental of all sanatan texts And still some parts of India people are facing it. Don’t try to hide rather accept and move fwd

India is name given by foreign . If they cannot pronounce name - is it not their problem?Their problem is made our problem by dot India movement. Shameful to say the least

@rakshithgowda2048

10 ай бұрын

No matter how many times u say that... D western boot lickers will never accept it

This guy summarizing Bharat as a divisive Brahminical ideology is nonsensical

Sanjeev Sanyal is a gem who talks facts.

@Stoiccynic224

10 ай бұрын

I think he's a gem because he talks what you like to hear..😂.

@ratnamahtani7128

10 ай бұрын

😮I

@Arthur-od9wz

10 ай бұрын

he literally spoke facts..lol...tht is wht people are appreciating@@Stoiccynic224...

@nirrmanchoudhury7248

10 ай бұрын

​@@Stoiccynic224 Arthur sometimes facts pain deep to fools ... and they try to smirk this with dud arguments....

@geetatripathi2454

10 ай бұрын

Somehow Devdutt has better information as compared to Sanjeev Sanyal. It looks like History competition. And who is he to correct Devdutt Patnaik. He should talk in context of Vedas and Puranas. Should get his facts right. From where did all tribes meet and agreed this seems to be something loosing out with facts. Suggest people to go and see the inscribe in Hathigumpha.

Devdutt is like Bilawal 🤢and Sanjeev is like Dr Jaishankar ❤

@biobharat

10 ай бұрын

Again pakistan connection, pakistan na hota to kya karte hum log 😂😂😂

@user-gd4bg6gk3n

10 ай бұрын

@@biobharat 😁😁

@sanidhyasuman1428

10 ай бұрын

​@@biobharatkoi na hamare country mein v bohot Pappu hai...😂

@kakun63

10 ай бұрын

to fir se bana ke unpr hagte@@biobharat

Devdutt is full of imagination. He simply talks with 200% confidence.

Did Devdutt just refer to himself as a scholar! Oops.

@alani3992

10 ай бұрын

He puts forward ideas. But maybe humans don't want to think for themselves.

@user-rr9ct7ko1y

10 ай бұрын

​@@alani3992ideas or narratives to sow the seeds of division?

@Anp562

10 ай бұрын

Dogs often sniff their own ass

@alani3992

10 ай бұрын

@@user-rr9ct7ko1y His thoughts are inclusive, not divisive. But if you think otherwise, I won't restrict your free-thought.

@buri_buri_Z

10 ай бұрын

​@@alani3992hus thoughts doesn't seem inclusive of brahmins , he literally hates brahmins and even though he tries to hide it in some way it still comes out . And then comes his distorted version of history .

Wow.... I never thought anyone could beat TV serials in non sense and illogical arguments, until I saw Devdutt speak. He never disappoints🤣 Logic and history completely left the chat😂

@gauravdey4163

10 ай бұрын

We don't care we are charvak s

Bharath is the original name of our country 🙏

Thank you Sanjeev sir for such a logical explanation.

Pattanaik is just a nautanki. Sanjeev sanyal is a gem😊

@RojaJaneman

10 ай бұрын

Not nautanki, he’s a dhartipe boj

@rumadadarkar5325

10 ай бұрын

Well said .

@nanikarc5826

10 ай бұрын

Yeah stupid guy this Devdutt. Sanjeev Sanyal is ssooooo knowledgable and explains well and addresses the questionⁿ

@geetatripathi2454

10 ай бұрын

Just because you dont know facts so you call Patnaik nautanki

@n______n26

10 ай бұрын

Sanjeev is an privileged entitled arrogant nepotism product has no sense of common sense/strifes of people

Lol Mr. Pattanaik was so terrible in his arguments. I mean he said Arabs call Egypt Misr. Fine, but Egypt is not called Misr. His example actually contradicts the idea of having multiple names officially. His eventually fell back on the strawman argument around Brahmin/Brahiminical/Brahminism.

@chanduji2855

10 ай бұрын

Indians too call Egypt as Missr

Are there multiple names for Davdutt Pattnaik? Can we call him as Patti to celebrate our plurality!

@chanduji2855

10 ай бұрын

Call him Davinson, he will look more plural and secular.

@teachersconference8932

10 ай бұрын

Lets ask Dev if he wants to be called Asur - plurality , diversity , 😮

My Brain cells are dying 1000000 times faster listening to Devdutt thank fully India Today also invited sane people like Sanjeev Sanyal.

Sadhguru said” Name BHARAT will change destiny for better” . Name is everything in Sanatan dharma. If what is in a name - then why Muslims of BHARAT have Arabic names and Christians have European names??? BHARAT means civilizational identity- the only one survived while other 44 civilizations destroyed with “ changing names of civilizations”

@chandrakantshanbhag3058

10 ай бұрын

Destroyed by CHRISTIANITY and ISLAM during HOLY WARS. CRUSADE INQUISITION HOLOCAUST. ETC. Let someone explain what are the contribution of these two religions for MANKIND and PEACE?

@vykuntapufangtxpreet9546

10 ай бұрын

Well *SADGHGURU* Is A Fraud Guru But I Agree With Him Here.

We need TV debates like this where we can learn something

@satyajit2007

10 ай бұрын

U don’t learn anything from here . Go and read good books . What debadutt is telling is entirely misleading and political

@rakshithgowda2048

10 ай бұрын

​​@@satyajit2007there is a lot to learn from historians like Sanjeev sanyal ... Devdutt just makes things up in his head n just dumps it on d ppl

@artculture1711

10 ай бұрын

Devdutt Pattnaik's "brahmanical" rant falls flat when people realise who the authors of Bharat's greatest revered epics 'Ramayan' & 'Mahabharat' are. They are 'Valmiki', a 'Bhill' fisherman turned dacoit turned sage. And 'Vyas', the son of a 'boat rover' (maajhi) woman Satyawati. "Brahmanical attrocity" treated these "low caste" members of the society so badly that they not only made their epics foundations of their own culture & view of the world, but also elevated these "low caste untouchables" into 'Maharshis' .. Maha-Rishis, the greatest of 'Brahmins'. So much for that idiotic, agenda centric Devdutt Pattnaik's credibility.

@sanbalakrishnan

10 ай бұрын

He has access to some good quality “stuff” that he smokes, snorts

Now I can imagine why he may have been shown the door at Reliance Group.

Devdut is crazy

@rumadadarkar5325

10 ай бұрын

And he is also Brainless

@iaanish

10 ай бұрын

He was crazy good. Sanyal was loud and crass. his Tholpakium take itself exposes him. Sorry unless you are a Tamil you won't understand it.

@janvysatya6595

10 ай бұрын

@@iaanish then you will also believe India came from indhu lol

@iaanish

10 ай бұрын

@@janvysatya6595 india can come from anywhere, before you comment on tamil language and culture as a historian, he should have done some 5 paise worth of research. There is no book called Tholpakium. It is Tholkapium, probably worlds first written book on grammar for a language. it is tamil and hence an indian book. have some respect when you take its name in public space as a historian. he is more of a votebank historian, spinning stories than a respectfully introspecting historian who talks with proof.

Woke up from long slumber to change name... Call it the way you want... India/Bharat/Hindustan it's our country...🇮🇳😍

@alani3992

10 ай бұрын

Yes like Deutschland/Alemania/Nymecho/Tyskland/Germany is one country. Many names signify deep & ancient relations.

@user-gd4bg6gk3n

10 ай бұрын

❤

@chanduji2855

10 ай бұрын

@@alani3992 can you elaborate the old names and new names of above countries you mentioned above?plz?

@diwa007

10 ай бұрын

You hit the nail on the head. The slumber was precisely for 9 years.

@alani3992

10 ай бұрын

@@chanduji2855 Those are all names for Germany. In Southern Europe its called 'Alemania', in Eastern Europe 'Nymecho' etc. Btw even Norway, Sweden, Hungary, Austria, Croatia etc are just the English names of those countries.

Thank you Sanjeev Sanyal for that session

When devdutt said scholar.. I almost fell off my chair..😂😂.. Bharath is brahminical... Level of his scholarship is exposed

Sanjeev is the best

Devdutt Pattanaik’s credibility comprehensively demolished by Sanjeev Sanyal sir.

@geetatripathi2454

10 ай бұрын

No not really go and read facts. Just speaking assertively doesn't specify Sanjeev Sanyal is correct

@WojtekTheBear2005

10 ай бұрын

​@geetatripathi2454 Sanjeev sanyal is wholly correct in what he's saying.

I have a cold today, I blame Brahmanical Hindu society for my troubles

I used to respect Sanjeev sanyal before this debate, but post listening to Dedutt patnail, I even more respect Sanjeev sanyal 😂

it baffles me that we as Indians in 2023 are debating over the name and discussing history to justify the usage of the name Bharat, each and every Bhartiya must have been taught or known that India is called Bharat. No body is "changing" the name just using the original one.

Sanjeev Sanyal at his best. Thank you Sanjeev. And that person Devdutt. He masquerades as very knowledgable and peddles his own concoctions as History. Which by the way very often calls it mythology. Myths ! He has been intellectually ripped apart by Rajiv Malhotra which I’ve read. Great show India Today

@prashanthm4641

10 ай бұрын

He is a manipulator

Seriously ??? Devdutt Pattanaik ??? OMG so much of time pass …. Ufff. You are insulting Sanjeev Sanyal’s intelligence to put him with Pattanaik.

BHARAT a wonderful move. No problems at all.

Patnaik is shamelessly divisive.

I was planning to read Mr. Pattanaik's books, but after listening to his explanations, I think I should save myself from the headache. All those who read his books to understand history, May God Save You.

This Pattanaik is suspect...he does not know Sanskrit yet had made tall claims...'India' is a Latin ( Roman) word.....an exonym as Rahul correctly pointed out. What is Pattanaik talki9ng about?!! The so called Indo-Aryans came fr "outside" ...so? Even the earliest Indians. i.e., the aborigines' or Austro-Asiatic ppl came via the sea cost fr Africa! So, literally every group in India has an origin outside this land! Pattanaik is obviously playing politics...

@sundareshanal1849

10 ай бұрын

Not suspect. He is structured fraud.

@iaanish

10 ай бұрын

Then how did caste system originate and why are 350 million indians outside this graded system treated as untouchables?. my question is not meant to hurt anyone's belief, sentiment or brain.

@rajotavo

10 ай бұрын

@@iaanish where did u get this data?!

@iaanish

10 ай бұрын

@@rajotavo too bad you don't know the population of SC/STs in india. look it up.

@rajotavo

10 ай бұрын

@@iaanish that includes SC and ST...right? They get govt. reservations...so? What is ur point? Untouchability is banned by Indian law. It has been acted upon...more needs to be executed on that front ..not denying the dark social side we still have...but what is ur point?

Devdutt is mystiriously singulor in explaning multi- diversified roots of bharat to bhraminism where as Sanjeev is strightforward & factful & convincing

@ytskt

10 ай бұрын

yes he was throwing all sorts of usual anti Hindu tropes hoping something would stick.... proved himself as an idiot instead

After this debate someone had a nervous breakdown. Hope he is alright.

@ytskt

10 ай бұрын

He did it to himself.

To use Devdutt Pattnaik as a expert is a riot ! This guy does not know the books which he has most probably not read in depth or in detail. One should read the critique on his expounding. The Lutyens media with their own inferiority complex are very quick to embrace this guys explanation, because they of course don’t have time to read. “ Andho main kana raja “ !

The negativity n hate in Pattnaik s words is in sheer contrast with hope n positivity that of Sanyal's

Sanjeev Sir brilliantly summarised the whole controversy with that "India that was Bharat" point in the end

as any one can predict devdutt is crying on his twitter. i was actually a big fan of his work even before his tv shows until he took a hard left.

@alani3992

10 ай бұрын

Congrats on wanting to hear what you 'want' to hear. Great human potential.

@incubusk8r

10 ай бұрын

@@alani3992 No really i really was a big fan. This debate was pre recorded and questions given long before hand, still the scholar got his FACTS WRONG. After he had ample time to prepare. Right now Devdutt is spiralling out of his mind on twitter. What is there to hear what i want to here when you have your facts wrong. He is going crazy (breaking friendships) and brahmin bashing and admits that he hates brahmins coz they question him. what i mean you hate people coz they ask questions? I have no love for brahmins i am a dalit (passi) my self. but he doesn't know how to handle an asswhopping. He would have his dignity if he just tweeted i am sorry i got a few facts wrong, good night and tomorrow is another day. A very thinned skin scholar i must say.

@user-rr9ct7ko1y

10 ай бұрын

​@@incubusk8rvery well articulated, everything I had in my mind. Also he accused Rahul of divide & rule for a simple enquiry that probably many have & went on to be nauseatingly divisive himself without any provocation.

@incubusk8r

10 ай бұрын

@@alani3992 believe me when i say this. I was your typical urban kid with an passion for marxist ideology and atheist. He, in a way made me a "born again hindu" abet still an atheist. But his new avatar of being this left brahmin bashing, not listening to any one and this passive aggressive blocking nonsence, and belitteling people who have genuine questions, sensitive one is putting many of his own fans off. all i can say is he WAS a great scholor and a human today after taking a hard left, he is a bitter bitter man and a horrible human. AND IT PAINS ME TO SAY IT.

@nowonami2524

10 ай бұрын

he forgot to say that outsiders (arabs) called certain people 'Hindu'. yet these same people (brahmans) insist on yelling "garv se kaho hum Hindu hai".

How can you call such a bigot on your channel....he has such a hate for brahmins...just repeating brahminical whether it makes sense or not....why does he hate Hinduism put Jains, Buddhists and outsiders in good context.

I knew this Devdutt would start this woke narrative

How many times did Devdutt mention about Brahamin/ Brahmanical??? Really ?Why?What’s your agenda?

Sanjeev Sanyal is 👌 ....needs no further debate 👏 ... 🇮🇳💪✌️🚩

Game Set and Match Sanjeev Sanyal ! Simply Brilliant !

Sanjeev sanyal is brilliant

Great sharing by Sanjeev & justifying the debate. Devdutt & people like him are trying to create a split among the people & our country. JAY BHARAT.

The word Sindhu has its etmological roots in Tamil. Just because it is in North India doesnt mean it should be sanskirit. Indhumathi is a Tamil word as well. Inthu and mathi both refer to moon in tamil, and that kind of two differenet phonemes meaning same is predominant characterstic of tamil language than in sanskirit. Such a linguistic structure is classified and categorized as heteronym. Similarly other example is 'Kaarmegam'....both kaar and megam mean clouds. Looks like india today only finds historians nearby😁

Devdutt can only tell stories

Sanyal sahab finishes in style, both the debate and that devdutt😂

Mythologist - my foot.

Devdutt Patnaik, Ravish kumar, Prashant Bhushan,Yogendra Yadav, Udaynidhi Stailin, Asaduddin Obesi Etc.....All Namse of one Soul

Being an Odia , I am ashamed of this Debdut Patnaik . This man is earning a bad name for our glorious Kalinga . Jai Jagannath 🕉

What a Oothiya, this DDP😅 Never knew this fellow is of this epic level

2:00-3:12 Mr Pattnaik very predictably advertised this mentality of "let others do it since it's characteristic to them but let us choose inaction because we are not like them" by leveraging the foolish, self-righteous, emotional garb of owning one's pluralism. This mentality basically opens the way to "let others walk over us because that's who they are, let us not learn from that and allow them to walk over us again as they please since we are that damn good-hearted". That seems like the mentality of someone who is happy eternally playing second-fiddle and being unimportant. The point he implied about plurality of gods being something unique to Bharat and The West having singular God-origins isn't even true. Before the politically-motivated spread of middle-eastern religions, most if not all of what now constitutes the West had multiple Gods (Greek pantheon, Norse pantheon). Multiple Gods has been a shared aspect of communities all across the world before the spread of middle-eastern cults that was often done through forced conversions.

Patnaik tries hard to mislead. He contradicts himself several times. On the one side he claims that Sindhu became Hindu bcoz Persians could not pronounce S, Hindus became Indus bcoz Greeks couldn’t pronounce even H. Then he goes on to spin the theory of Indumati! Was Indumati named so due to Persian and Greek considerations? Absurd! Indisputable fact is that the word has come from Persian and Greek distortions! And that it was the foreigners who gave us the name India.

Dhanyavad 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

What does this man(devdutt) has against brahmins

@AhamBrahmosmi

10 ай бұрын

Congress funds

@aashish.purohit

10 ай бұрын

He is Wyndi doneger dattak 'putra', Established to distort Hindu History

Devdutt a scholar…🤣🤣🤣

By this discussion with Devdutt Pattnaik only one thing came out prominently and that he is very opinionated against Brahmins. At one point he showed his hate for Kshtriyas also, and for Kshatriya is more than even Brahmins.

When you use Brahmin word repeatedly in your talk, Devadattji, it looks more political than academic,.... But no worries, now in India every one is political and they want their argument to win. Yet, your description is very knowledgeable.

His other name is dhuttDhutt (like one says to dog) derived from Sanskrit Devdutt. He should gladly accept plurality.

@vrishalisonar453

10 ай бұрын

😅😂😂

Please don’t call Devdutt again. He needs a non- colonial education! There is a reason we do not teach such distorted history in schools. 👎

So tomorrow if westerners start calling this patnaik guy “jerk” or “maniac” , he will celebrate that word because of his pluralism and multiplicity! 😅

Wow. Parnaik ticked all the propaganda boxes. 1. Caste checked.. 2. Foreign over native checked. 3. Hindu vs other. Glad that he favoured Jains. 4. South vs North..

Devdutra bhai kuch bhi logic lagaoge kya ?

I don't know how India signifies the plurality as arguments presented by Devdutt patnaik. There's complete lack of rationality presented by him. If this is the level of our so called intelligentsia then how could we become vishwaguru ?

Devdutt is absolutely a valuable gem who should be exhibited in the Tower of London, we could exchange it with Kohinoor...

Sanyal, calm collected Brilliance 🫡

Thank you Mr. Sanyal for this very logical view point

Devdhoot works for his colonial masters and want to keep them happy..

Bharat Arthat India in Hindi version should be more widely publicised, as there Bharat comes first!!

A good discussion…of course, Mr. Sanyal is more clear about what he has to say with historical facts, and very convincing….his explanations should be read or listened by more people to know what is what… happy that both 🇮🇳 India and Bharath are oringinally from our land only. Period. Thanks to Sanyal.

Sanjiv is a great person

Mr Rahul, next time you get 2 experts. Make them debate an issue together.

What a reply to Rahul from Devdutt. Should see change of face colour

Thank you Sanyalji…. Very convincing

Unfortunately lot of middle class Indians learn Hinduism through Debadutt . He often morphs Indic thoughts to suit his woke audience

Devdutt himself is a myth.

Yesterday this conversation had different format. Both participants were in discussion/dialog mode. The present one is in the form of two lectures by Devdutt and Sanyal. Why was the original conversation suddenly taken off KZread ? Who objected to the format ? Sanyal or Devdutt ? Devdutt became more assertive in the present one. Devdutt is backward. He only studies, interprets , and disseminates mythology. Sangh pariwar is forward looking. It creates mythology. Sangh has clear objectives and strategy to achieve goals. They don't do anything without a purpose. They are also proactive and take the initiative. I really appreciate the strategic thinkers in the backroom who evolve strategies. Any one who opposes them is only in reactive mode. Any religion must take the control over the thoughts of the target people. Words are powerful. They can both aid or interfere with the pracharak's goals. Making the word "India" as foreign is an intelligent ploy. It appears that the ruling dispensation feels that "oneness" against the "other" (unite the Hindus to created divide between Hindus and foreign religions) will continue to yield electoral results. Will economic law of diminishing returns apply to this situation ? We Indians (and Hindus) are diverse groups. There is no need to "unite" us. We have been living in our zones as well as interacting with different internal cultures fairly well since independence. It is our diversity that has sustained democracy. Not our wisdom. We are as human as anyone else in the world. Democracy essentially means freedom of thought and action to the individual. There are two axis of freedoms- social and economic. The current regime offer low level of freedom on both axis. It's time for citizens to think about the underlying objectives and purpose. Indians need freedom and economic well-being. Hope we get it

This Patanai should not be given a platform for insulting us. He says Hindu texts were all created by Brahmins. Valmiki who wrote the Ramayana was a Dalit, so was Veda Vaasa.

This is over when you started with Bharat has more ‘Indic’ roots 😂

for someone like devdutt who unfortunately knws some history and is famous and promotes the divide n rule someone like Sanjeev sir was the best kryptonite..his every facts tht he was twisting was pointed out and checked this is what we want more people like Sanjeev sir who can take on these pseudo intellectuals

@sumanair9317

10 ай бұрын

As far as this discussion is concerned, Devadutt was clear and Sanyal was fumbling

@WojtekTheBear2005

10 ай бұрын

​@sumanair9317 yes and you are Einstein. Now shut up. Patt-anaik got patt se head by Sanjeev sanyal

Sanjeev’s explanation is absolutely correct! Thank you Sanjeev 🙏🇮🇳

Absolutely agree that Devdutt’s interpretation of South and North is in factual

For get all,about history mythology ?one simple,fact is India was coined by British Why hang on to British Legacyn even after independence .So Bharath is the right name

@UjwalRam

10 ай бұрын

Right point. Why all these discussions. At that time they wanted to include Britain flag as well in our flag . I was shocked reading that .

@kaalishanmugam5796

10 ай бұрын

Well then one should start with "Hindu" which was more probably straight up coined the by the British to refer to a religion unlike India which like they said, goes far beyond British.

@Admiralmoti

10 ай бұрын

​@@kaalishanmugam5796And right after that, let's remove "Dravidians" too since the Brits coined the term.

Someone's mispronunciation became my country's name.

Devdutt is a mythologist and talks myths, including those of his own making. He is not a Ithihasist or historian. There is nothing called Brahminical ethos.

The background history for Bharatas: The Bharatas were an early Vedic tribe that existed in the latter half of the second millennium B.C. The earliest mentioned location of the Bharatas was on the first Sarasvatī River in southern Afghanistan. Led by the tribal king Divodāsa, the Bharatas moved through the Hindu Kush mountains and defeated Śambara. Divodāsa's descendant, Sudās, won the Battle of the Ten Kings against a Pūru-led coalition, after which the initial compilation of hymns of the R̥gveda was carried out.[citation needed] After the battle, the Bharatas and other Pūru clans eventually formed the Kuru Kingdom, which was the first attested state in Indian history. The name Bharata is of Indo-Aryan and Indo-Iranian origin, meaning "bearers" or "carriers". (Taken from Wikipedia)

i am surprised how Devdutt is even counted as an expert on these matters. bharatam is a name heavily used in ancient tamil lietrature too.

India, that is Bharat Bharat, that is not (necessarily) India

@alani3992

10 ай бұрын

Nepal & Lanka is also Bharat, so why not annex them. or call this just the "British States of Bharat".

@vivekthakkar793

10 ай бұрын

@@alani3992if you lose a limb in an accident, hopefully you won’t change your name cause of that.

@alani3992

10 ай бұрын

@@vivekthakkar793 The Delhi-state was not created on cultural basis. If it were so, Nepal & Lanka should have joined too

यदि आप स्वयं को 'भारत' या 'भरत' या 'भरत' कहते हैं तो हमें कोई फ़र्क नहीं पड़ता। लेकिन हमारे लिए, आप राज्यों के संघ के प्रधान मंत्री हैं, यह आपकी स्थिति है

Sorry.... the name India has nothing to do with pure or impure of anything extrernal .......my family members are married to non-Indians,..so does that make them impure??? Such rubbish being spoken by Devdutt. I 100% support Bharat.