Im watching this instead of doing my math homework lmfao

@vergil-__

Жыл бұрын

same

@thiagosantellan1062

Жыл бұрын

It works for me i'm learning the thing i am suposed to be learning instead of shitty angle things that everyone can deduct literally from the name of it

@vibasacademy4591

8 ай бұрын

same

@heco.

7 ай бұрын

yep me too

@tfghykl

7 ай бұрын

Same lol

Fun fact: The guy who introduced letters did a a great job because before that you would have to right math in English sentences and that would be a nightmare

@user-js9sn9sr9f

7 ай бұрын

well you had to learn how to write arabic in order to use them or just use your letters or just imagine some symbol and give it a value

@namename4396

5 ай бұрын

​@@user-js9sn9sr9fsoon we'll be using emojis for math

@greengreen110

5 ай бұрын

Math with letters: 5x+2=17 => 5x=15 => x=3 Math without letters: The sum between two and our unknown number multiplied by five is equal to seventeen By subtracting two from both sides we can conclude that our unknown number multiplied by five is equal to fifteen By then dividing both sides by five we arrive at the value of our previously unknown number which is three

@andersnelson

5 ай бұрын

But did he actually make it up? 1:30 I never understood the idea of just making up an imaginary number that somehow is the SEEMINGLY IMPOSSIBLE square root of -1.

@Master_Cinar

5 ай бұрын

​@@greengreen110 It is used in some problems

"Oh yeah and you have to assume the turkey is a sphere" My friend helping me with thermodynamics homework

7:24 is the scariest moment in a mathematicians life when u get 3 days to solve 2 open book questions those questions are like millenium questions lol

You forgot the most important math rule: pi = 3. Source? My buddy who's an engineer.

@aymencraftpro1878

7 ай бұрын

Well... We do this in engineering class (highschool)

@creeper7ech520

7 ай бұрын

I'm Igor Pachmelnik Zakuskov and I'm an engineer~

@mmmmmmok5292

7 ай бұрын

thats the last meme

@nileprimewastaken

7 ай бұрын

14:21

@AnshuOP69

6 ай бұрын

​@@creeper7ech520let me take by breakfast first

When the Equation results in x = x then it either means you have done something wrong or this means that there are infinite solutions.

7:27 did not expect a meme critiquing the mathematical logic featured in a piece of erotic art

@marufhasanchdry

7 ай бұрын

Same

@user-ux3ju9wz4x

6 ай бұрын

The sauce is manhwa : one's in laws virgins

@abarette_

5 ай бұрын

​@@user-ux3ju9wz4xbro is actually him

@pierrotzzz

22 күн бұрын

Crqzy for u to know this​@@user-ux3ju9wz4x

7:14 Literally every math olympiad ever

7:44 We can assume "mf" wanted us to find out what the base is. If log_x(sqrt(3)) = 3, then x ≈ 1.2 or just the 6th root of 3.

@user-ux3ju9wz4x

6 ай бұрын

The sauce is manhwa : one's in-laws virgins

@carlosmorgadosilva3517

4 ай бұрын

there is also another major flaw. He states 3/[5 · (5-4)] = +1 which is wrong. It would be 3/(5·1)=3/5=0.8 (in decimals) so... yeah. Also he should have not put +1 but instead just 1 but, I mean, putting it isn't wrong, just unnecessary.

@theoneandonlyvictor73

2 ай бұрын

That "mf" also wrote a lot of nonsense in the sauce so uhh... see for yourselves I guess?

@trangtt2410

9 күн бұрын

@@user-ux3ju9wz4x _No._

@trangtt2410

9 күн бұрын

@@user-ux3ju9wz4x Or at least; I didn't find it.

1:19 oPInion

12:34 I’ve dived into the rabbit hole that is tuning in music. I don’t know how much this applies to other areas of math, but it most certainly applies here. Pythagoras wanted tuning to be done with perfect ratios. What happened instead is that everything had to be centered around a bunch of roots of 2, most commonly the 12th root of 2

@cewla3348

5 ай бұрын

hello! there are 12 semitones before pitch doubles, so the increase from semitone(x) to semitone(y) is (12th root(2)) x (y-x). That's it. That's everything.

@theAmazingJunkman

5 ай бұрын

@@cewla3348 That’s a good description of equal temperament, but I’m talking about tuning as a whole. When someone plays two notes that are a perfect 5th apart, ideally the ratio between the two frequencies would be 1.5, in which case there would be no “clashing” between two pitches (the way you tell two pitches are out of tune.) This was the basis for Pythagoras’ tuning system Unfortunately, Pythagoras’ tuning system only works in 1 key. If we tune the entire piano with one pitch in mind, none of the other 11 keys will sound in tune at all. In light of this, a compromise had to be made. That compromise was Equal Temperament. That nice 1.5 ratio I mentioned earlier is replaced with 2 to the 7/12th power, which is about 1.4983. It’s not in tune, but now that same interval is equally out of tune in all 12 keys. The tuning rabbit hole only goes deeper, I’ve only scratched the surface here

Technically, there is a formal sequence of the best possible rational approximations of pi. The first one is 3. The second is 22/7. The fourth is 355/113. The fifth is 103993/33102.

@shahanshahpolonium

6 ай бұрын

third?

@angeldude101

6 ай бұрын

@@shahanshahpolonium 333/106. It is very close to the fourth and also just not very interesting compared to the first two and the shear gap between the 4th and the 5th.

@shahanshahpolonium

6 ай бұрын

@@angeldude101 ohk thanks

@EmmaTheSmol

6 ай бұрын

I think 355/113 is the most accurate, could be wrong tho

@mumujibirb

5 ай бұрын

103993/33102 approx 3.1415926530 It gets 10 digits correct, but 103993/33102 has 11 digits. This means that memorizing the first 11 digits of pi is more accurate than using it. 355/113 is unique because it's around 3.1415929... and gets 7 digits right despite being 6 digits long

4:42 is the funniest math meme to me ever

@lebaguette5393

11 ай бұрын

Greetings fellow bprp enjoyer

@Clashingthanos

6 ай бұрын

Hi fellow bprp fish

@SCidejump

5 ай бұрын

​@@ClashingthanosW of fish times e to that same fish, and you get back the fish

I acctually asked the quesiton at 4:05 to my math teacher in the 8th grade. He told me that one can calculate with i but not with 0/0. Looking back to it, it was a solid answer that I could understand. Good guy, he was pretty fit to.

@PouLS

6 ай бұрын

What was the question?

@LockenJohny101

6 ай бұрын

@@PouLS if we can claim sqrt(-1)=i, why cant we claim 0/0=j ?

@mismis3153

5 ай бұрын

​@@LockenJohny101we can allow anything, the real issue is whether it's useful or not. By allowing i to exist, you create the complex set, which has many useful applications and interesting properties. By allowing /0, you are creating the 0 ring, which does exist but is pretty much useless.

@LockenJohny101

5 ай бұрын

@@mismis3153 what is a zero ring? I am not aware of a inverse element of 0 in terms of multiplication is availible.

@mismis3153

5 ай бұрын

@@LockenJohny101 search it on Wikipedia. In short its a number set like the complex or natural numbers, except the only number is 0. 1 = 0, 2 = 0, 1/0 = 0, etc...

I didn't expect bprp to appear and it made me happy to see him Edit: and also the organic chemistry tutor and 3b1b

@SCidejump

5 ай бұрын

Same, bprp is cool

13:06 the guy who pay $30 , eventually lost $10💀

@smileei

3 ай бұрын

Ya his expenditure is like -20-30=-50

Died internally of laughter while watching this😂

5:48 ChatGPT is wiser than we give credit.

You dare disrespect physics

4:05 technically infinity is also imaginary

@cubicinfinity2

6 ай бұрын

imaginary, not "imaginary"

@jokutyyppi4226

5 ай бұрын

​@@cubicinfinity2what's the difference

@cubicinfinity

5 ай бұрын

​@@jokutyyppi4226 What I meant is infinity is a complex number but not an imaginary one because its imaginary component is zero (unless we are talking about ∞i). But it is also not really a number and more of a construct, which you may call imaginary.

3:07 i am tired, lack of sleep, while seeing this my brain just disfunctioned and i started laughing like never in my entire life

10:14 Or, my personal favorite: the bar over the repeating decimal(s)

@mekko9312

7 ай бұрын

Doesn't everyone use brackets? 0.(3)

@mikaeloverfjord9047

7 ай бұрын

@@mekko9312 no, I have never seen that

@mekko9312

7 ай бұрын

@@mikaeloverfjord9047 Wait, really? The way I learned is that whenever we have a fraction that can't be written in base 10 because it has infinite decimals, we write the part that repeats within brackets For example, 0.333333... is 0.(3) 0.626262626262... is 0.(62) 0.19747474747474... is 0.19(74) We even have an algorithm to transform these fractions into ordinary fractions The whole number (ignoring the comma and the brackets, for example 0,1(6) would be 016 or 16) - The whole number without the part in the brackets (using the same rule as before) over as many nines as numbers in the brackets and as many zeroes for every decimal outside of the brackets So for ex If we have 0.1(6): (16-1)/90=15/90=1/6 And if you calculate 1/6, it indeed is equal with 0.16666... or 0.1(6) 0.(3)=(3-0)/9=1/3 7.28(14)=(72814-728)/9900=72086/9900 I thought everyone was using this, how do y'all do maths without these?

@mcjavabelike8320

7 ай бұрын

@@mekko9312that reads as 0*3 to me

@mekko9312

7 ай бұрын

@@mcjavabelike8320 Well there is a comma in between them so you dont multiply Also we use commas instead of dots, and we don't use commas to differentiate from hundreds to thousands to millions etc We don't write: 1,896,542.672 We write: 1896542,672 I live in Romania btw, if you wonder where this crazy way of doing maths comes from

i^2 = -1 --- Source? : Nah, its complex...

0:32 no, wait... he has a point.

8:30 I cannot express my hatred of whoever came up with the squeeze theorem

@ethanbottomley-mason8447

5 ай бұрын

Nah, the squeeze theorem is obvious with an easy proof and it is really nice. You can reimagine the squeeze theorem as just saying that if f(x) a f(x) a g(x), applying this with h(x)

@emperorhirodripo5863

5 ай бұрын

@@ethanbottomley-mason8447 ​ @ethanbottomley-mason8447 ik, and its really helpful and nice, i just hate the fact taht my school requires me to write a 10 paragraph text whenever i use it, to explain why if 1

4:52 Limits: Am I a joke to you?

13:03 is wrong, because the person who is buying the box for $30 gives a total of $50 (initial $20 + $30) and ends up with 40$ so person 2 loses $10 while person 1 makes a profit of $10 (-$20 + $30). yes problem. but you could probably trick your friend one time for a free 10 bucks lol.

@gracetonsanthmayor6687

8 ай бұрын

Bruh

@lenoobxd

7 ай бұрын

In a nutshell: the box buyer will be scammed and you should -not- do it to your frien

@PeterBarnes2

6 ай бұрын

It's not, perhaps, intended as a paradox, but more like a 'garden path' problem, where it's easy to get caught up on the wrong details. It's a good way of showing how to take a step back. Or to make $10 quickly, idk.

@prismatic-bl8qf

4 ай бұрын

blud im glad you realised that was the entire point of the meme

4:40 this got me,i learned calc off bprp

0:24 ∓ and ±

@andrzejmatwijenko7311

3 ай бұрын

Or X and Y

0:19 i rarely eat 3.14 2.72

@mihaleben6051

6 ай бұрын

Yay

Fermat's last theroem makes sense Any power higher than 2 when added to numbers will not give equal numbers

1:49 I thought topology was the only term in 3d art

2:07 my bro missed complex numbers 💀

@animeshpal2523

7 ай бұрын

they are imagery

2:08 Could also be (-∞, +∞)

@bluegaming2746

5 ай бұрын

ℂ would be better though.

4:22 my dad sent me that meme once

4:41 liked that meme also is that blackpenredpen?

watching this before a math exam instead of practicing math, damn I feel smart even while procrastinating lmao

4:55 bro is trying to say that the harmonic series converges 💀

@vendettawasd4516

6 ай бұрын

Fr

14:08 used to quick derive formulas for physics in high school

2:03 Me watching this exactly 3 months and 8 days before my 19th birthday: I feel like Luigi in second photo.

4:45 As a Turk, I can say that this is really sound like something that our prime minister would say.

Fun fact: you CAN divide by 0 in Wheel Theory.

The one with the log(sqrt(3)) = 3 would mean the logarithm had a base of the 6th root of 3

13:00 the guy on the left put $20 in the box, then paid another $30, and only received $40 at the end, meaning he lost $10.

1:26 becomes even funnier when you see that the original guy that conceptualized imaginary numbers looks like the chad in the template

alas, not allowing sqrt(-1) creates a bigger problem than not allowing 1/0

9:48 cosmologists: let’s round pi to 10 for the sake of ease

Bprp saving lives out here ❤.

5:02 As a guy who understands and so likes math this had me fucking dying 😂😂😂

"I dont care about you opinion"🤣🤣

4:11 Well, quantum equations use _i_ so it ended up retractively reflectig reality

6:19 is actually genius doe

That is too relatable 💀

2:11 Principle of induction😂

91 is easily not a prime number. It's divisible by seven because it's literally 70 + 21

10:13 who else choked on their water when the voice started reading all those 3’s?

13:11 you forgot about two!!

@tyruskarmesin5418

6 ай бұрын

You are thinking of prime numbers. 2 is even.

It's 1:30 AM rn, I have my Group Theory and Complex Analysis exam at 9:30 and I'm watching this.

EVERYONE LOVES THE ORGANIC CHEMISTRY TUTOR

91 is divisible by 7 thirteen times. 51 is divisible by 17 three times. This is... actually the first time I thoroughly noticed this.

7:39 in mathematics when base of a log is not given, it is self understood as natural log also represented by "ln" ( log with base e ) Even after that it still doesn't matter as you will be getting a different answer anyways BUT if we assume that base is "e" inches and the input is in foot We get In (12√3) ≈ 3.03 😮

4:57 no u have to do < or = infinity since infinity can be an answer

2:24 Nah fam, I love plug and chug. Knowing which numbers to put where and how I can put them through the calculator is bliss. On the other hand, graphing can go die in a hole.

i have my MVC exam in a couple of hours which I absolutely haven't studied for and here I am

7:38 it's base 6th root of 3 for anyone wondering

14:23 I too use 3 for pi

7:39 The funniest thing was, I paused it right before it could start reading it out to me to see if anything was wrong. I saw that log(sqrt(3))=3 and had to calculate the base of the log in order to make the statement correct, then the punchline hit and I was dying xDD (btw it's e^((ln3)/6))

@E.h.a.n

7 ай бұрын

I don't get it

@oggunlukarmy4901

7 ай бұрын

me neither@@E.h.a.n

@marufhasanchdry

7 ай бұрын

​@@E.h.a.nweakness disgusts me

@marufhasanchdry

7 ай бұрын

Its 6th root of 3 btw

@shyless6526

6 ай бұрын

Wtf, why do you use e if you could just use roots and defenition of a log... Like the guy above. Overcomplicating things is not cool

8:44 1=e^iπ+2, so blue=1 red=1. 1=1

Thank god I'm not the only one that think/pronounce sqrt as squirt 😂

Me after 20 minutes of finally figuring out one equation on measurement: A win is a win

The Cos meme got me😂😂😂

0:24 maybe not iconic but still pretty famous in calc are epsilon,N or M ( depends ) .

I learned more about math from this video than my entire math class

Name a more iconic duo... X and Y

I use A - B and funnily enough, I have a lot of saved pictures of that redhead girl.

This is good actually

8:09 are you using a Texas Instruments 137? Or a 8 digit calculator? 😂

4:41 HAHAHA I CAN RELATE TO THE STUDENT😂

Fun fact: An odd number without the letter "e" is six sixths. (Of course, simplified it has the letter "e", but the non-simplified version does not.)

2:59 51 is 3x17 91 is 7x13

@MiniGamesPython

Ай бұрын

Yea

2:07 Complex and hypercomplex numbers: am I a joke to you??

Iconic duo in maths: 1. X and Y 2. + and - 3. ( and ) 4. × and ÷ 5.

2:04 bro didnt name every number. He didnt specify the set he was in. I'm assuming he is reffering to the real numbers, but even then he would be wrong. The correct answer would be an infinitum of complex numbers such that ℂ = {a + bi | a, b ∈ ℝ}

@ethanbottomley-mason8447

5 ай бұрын

You can go farther than that. The complex numbers are not the only numbers, there are also quaternion, modukar arithmetic, rational functions, etc. The most complete collection of all numbers would just be the category of rings.

11:45. With the advents of AI, I don’t doubt it

Epsilon & mew are best(worst ) dou, as an EEE student. It's probably similar for physics too

I love this video❤.

If you have the argument and the output of a log, you can work out what the base is, because there is still only one unknown: log(b)(3^(1/2))=3 3^(1/2)=b^3 b=3^(1/6) b~=1.2

8:05 that’s not even a math question with an answer that’s a goddamn function

8:00 Im laughing and crying at the same time

7:34 sauce is manhwa called one's in-laws virgins , genre: harem 18+ obviously

@pokebill9901

6 ай бұрын

🫡

The π🧅 joke is actually perfect

6:18 Very clever indeed 😮

@croassung3721

4 ай бұрын

looks like the morbius strip correct me if I’m wrong

@Homelander_69420_

4 ай бұрын

​@@croassung3721you are correct 💯

U can never tell me u didnt used to call sqrt() "squirt" 😂💀💀

Tomorrow I will have my class 12 math exam , and I searched for math casually..... And KZread showed me this.... Enjoyed as well as wasted 14 mins of my life....

10:13 text to speech getting an accent

the thubnail is my 2 intrests meeting in one place for a wholsome place ie (history, maths )

12:43 he‘s missing a ruler or something to make straight lines with

7:22 the base is 3^(1/6)

6:35 I say sqrt like skrt

Brithemathguy, RPBP, mindyourdecisions and 3blue1brown are the goats of mathematics on KZread