Guys hear me out. I think the multiplication symbol for primary school is really an algebraic x but it’s just equal to 1 so 5x6 is still 5 times 6.

@user_cy1er

7 ай бұрын

Lmao yes

@bothenumberblockslogoedito1339

7 ай бұрын

Yes.@@user_cy1er

@marufhasanchdry

7 ай бұрын

That actually makes sense lol

@Daniboy0826

7 ай бұрын

Oooohhh, basically a simplified parenthesis! Yes, I can live with that! :)

@Klobig_

7 ай бұрын

🤓😹

The Von Neumann one was pretty spot on tbh

2:16 255? Ludicrous! 289? Outrageous! 306? Preposterous!

@Eaten_squid_cake

6 ай бұрын

A Hundred Million and One? OFF WITH HER HEAD!

@MatthewConnellan-xc3oj

26 күн бұрын

731? Insanity. 102? Crazy talk.

I love the 'Look what they need to mimic a fraction' one, it's just n on 100. (n/100)

These memes are actually good

"The factorial: x!" "The cooler factorial: Γ(x)" Setting aside the fact that that's wrong and it's really Γ(x+1): The coolest factorial: Π(x)

@RSpaco

7 ай бұрын

ye

7:03 the struggle is real

@sorbetcitron6783

6 ай бұрын

why ? They'd write ln if they meant ln and log if they meant log

0:39 Precedent value corresponds identically to the proceeding value.

@neoieo5832

26 күн бұрын

define "corresponds identically"

2:53 I have a Sharp. it's pretty old but it works fine... but I want a TI-84 plus CE and you probably know why (if you don't, then idk)

If two numbers A and B can be defined in a set that only has one variable in it Then A and B are the same A=B B=A

@Tcrrxzz

5 ай бұрын

For a second I thought your pfp looked like Prime Newtons’ pfp

@victoriamitchell413

5 ай бұрын

@@Tcrrxzz What is prime newton

@Tcrrxzz

5 ай бұрын

@@victoriamitchell413 he is a math KZreadr, you can search him up

@plasmakitten4261

3 ай бұрын

Or you could say its an equivalence relation on the integers, real numbers, rational numbers, complex numbers, etc.

10:08 the last one is burning my insides

I have a profound love for casio calculators. they're the only one I use.

I’m gonna try to simplify that

me watching this and having no clue what the hell is happening but still trying to understand because i like math:

0:27 society if op did the same amount of googling to find out what 5.082e+12 is

@GamerSoda-wk1ji

Ай бұрын

5.082 times 10 to the power of 12

@The_SB373

17 күн бұрын

Is it 5.082 trillion

@modahabbab4576

17 күн бұрын

@@The_SB373 yes

Equality (of the complex numbers) is a relation that is transitive, symmetric and reflexive. It's not that hard to define

1:15 the equation on the right side of the bell curve is true if the field from which the coefficients of the polynomial is taken has a charecteristic of 2.

@getsetgaming3475

2 ай бұрын

What?

5:21 don't even mention x^3=1 or x^6=1. I leave the answer to these equations as an exercize for the reader. ANSWERS: x^6=1 x=1, x=-1, x= wait for it... -1/2-(sqrt(3)/2)i, 1/2-(sqrt(3)/2)i, -1/2+(sqrt(3)/2)i, 1/2+(sqrt(3)/2)i

@evetheeevee2977

Ай бұрын

Other powers get even worse lmao. If these solutions were on a complex plane, they'd form regular polygons (eg. If these answers for x⁶=1 were put on a complex plane they'd form a hexagon) Imagine something like x⁷ or x⁹

3:18 Then I’m Lawful and Chaotic good.

Loved em😂

0:51 this book is prescribed for us to study Algebra in our Masters☠️

Also, that pipeline was already the goal, although I have a speed run trick, try learning coding, most optimal is through Linux

Although that’s not very simplified, might try torturing my calculator some more

And finally, the surface of the earth has a positive Gaussian curvature

You know you did too much math when you get mad at that creampie joke rounding up py.

we learned sin, cos, tan, cot, sec, and cosec in my precal class, but some students don't take that class

4:04 I have an epidemiology joke, but I'm pretty sure it's gonna spread.

8:09 me: wait what is tha- “up to isomorphism” oh right those things

6:02 that depends, which number contains the string "8008135" before any other?

*...is an integer idk how to say this..." LOL

my attempt at defining equality on the real numbers: 1. = is an equivalence relation. 2. All axioms of the field of real numbers hold. 3. Given two real numbers a and b, a = b ⇔ a-b satisfies all the properties of the additive identity of the field R.

@rlachiecyce

7 ай бұрын

Me, clearly not even having an intention to define it correctly: Two things are equal when they are... *overlappable*

@giovanni1946

7 ай бұрын

To define an equivalence relation, you need to define equality...

@user-hp2dr5qc8p

6 ай бұрын

@@giovanni1946 Exactly. I don't think we should be trying to define the undefinable. Some concepts are just intuitively graspable, and can't be broken down into any simpler concepts. It's like my asking you to define "knowledge" or "existence".

@electrospeeder9692

3 ай бұрын

@@user-hp2dr5qc8p Incorrect. OP has the correct definition via set theory. And no, you define equivalence relations before equality.

@user-hp2dr5qc8p

3 ай бұрын

@@electrospeeder9692 Sorry, but this is no definition. This is just restating properties (or axioms) of "equality", it's not making it any clearer what its quiddity is. It's making equality out to be some mysterious concept we don't know, and only care about its consequences (e.g. if a=b then b=a, a-b=0, etc.)

4:00 I have a math joke but it's complex. I have a history joke but it's in the past I might think i have a funny joke about lingustics but it's hard to say

8:10 Easy: Z20 Z10 x Z2 Z5 x Z4 Z5 x Z2 x Z2

4:08 Z/pZ with p a prime number

@julianbruns7459

7 ай бұрын

There are more finite simple groups than the cyclic groups. You forgot: - Alternating groups - Special linear groups - Orthogonal groups - Symplectic groups - Unitary groups - Projective linear groups - Chevalley groups - Steinberg groups - Suzuki-Ree groups - Matthieu groups - Janko groups - Conway groups - Fischer groups - Higman-Sims group - McLaughlin group - Held group - Rudvalis group - Suzuki group - O'Nan group - Harada-Norton group - Lyons group - Thompson group - Baby Monster group - Monster group - Tits group

@dudono1744

7 ай бұрын

@@julianbruns7459 oopsie (idk what most of these are)

0:39 = is the opposite of ≠.

Society if the variable t didn't exist next to +:

4:00 I have a computer science joke, but I lost the text file for it.

The earth is a fractal shape with 2.3 dimensions

0:40 It’s mathematically impossible. =≠explain

3:18 "0 2/3" 💀

circles have *1* edge

The 8:37 was crazy !

sqrt(2)^sqrt(2) Or e

My favorite irrational number is phi

7:43 THATS WHAT IVE BEEN SAYINg

HE MADE A D🝮︎︎︎︎︎︎︎❥︎K OUT OF DESMOS 3D CALCULATOR 😭😭😭

X=Y If every set that contains X also contains Y :)

6:02 pi

2:09 how about 391?

5:16 ±k and ±j: 💀💀💀💀 5:59 Ф is just (√5+1)/2

@sinox5

Ай бұрын

And that makes it an irrational number

Theoretical probability accumulative 1/2x Definite probability 1/2 Lands on the edge,🤐🤫

5:29 spurral

sin(0)=0 cos(0)=1

77 + 33 = duck. So, 77+33, first, we subtract, 7-3 = 4, a, b, c , D, (fourth letter and four) then 7+ sum of the last equation so 7+4 = 11, repeat step one and step two (adding and subtracting), then 7+3. 7+3 is 10. Add the sum of 7+4 to 7+3's sum, 21. The 21st letter in the alphabet is u. Take away all numbers in 77+33 except for one 3. Now, __+3_, a, b, C, so you know step one and step two, (adding and subtracting) 7+4 is 11! K IS THE ELEVENTH LETTER OF THE ALPHABET! So 77+33 is duck.

9:58 that seems a bit too complex for me

Do you know what make maths funny??? Texas!!!

x^x^2=2 if and only if x^2=2

@julianbruns7459

7 ай бұрын

*Assuming x is a real number

8:32 Earth is geoid

4:25 is basically saying that all values of n, if put into the equation, would be an element of the set of natural numbers.

@hyperpsych6483

7 ай бұрын

cap, if n is an element of the natrual numbers, then the expression is an integer

@dudono1744

7 ай бұрын

It reads "for all n in the set of naturals"

@davefoxxo

6 ай бұрын

i read it as "for all n in N" in my mind because "naturals" is 2 too many syllables 👍

1:15 how does (x+1)^2=x^2+1^2? I am so confused

@getsetgaming3475

2 ай бұрын

I think we are just average

100,000,001 is divisible by 17

10:13 it is equal to 2

@donovanmahan2901

6 ай бұрын

if you look closely, the denominator of that second exponent isn't 2n - 20, but 2^(n-20), best i can do is to make the power tower: 2^((n-10)*2^(-n+21))

0:54 bro who use other things than 2kpi?

@TheOne_6

7 ай бұрын

come to plain wrong maths corner we have: 2πk πk2 kπ2

@godelianconfucianism8184

7 ай бұрын

@@TheOne_6 best one is π2k

@hyperpsych6483

7 ай бұрын

why would you not put 2 and pi next to each other, i mean there is a whole debate about define pi as the ratio of circumfrence to radius just because 2pi is so common.

@klyanksg

7 ай бұрын

@@hyperpsych6483 yeah you are right but you know I learned it like that so its become à reflex but I agree with you

@angeldude101

7 ай бұрын

Me: "kτ"

1:08 i don't get it

Obviously φ

*tan (x)=x*

1/0 =undefined →i 1/0=1/0^∞ 1/0^∞=0^(-∞) 1/0^∞=0^(-∞) 0^(-∞)=0^∞ 0^∞=0 →ii From 1 and 2 0=undefined Zero is a fictional value that doesn't exist

3\2

2^2^(21-n) * (n-10)

3\2: *TRUE EVIL* 3:18

x=x✍️...

@yjlom

7 ай бұрын

with your definition, I submit to you… = : Ω² → 𝔹 : (x, y) ↦ 1 meaning, for example, that 5 = sin

in persian, cos is vag**a

What's the difference between sinx=x and cosx=x 💀

@ponnshaa2007

7 ай бұрын

sinx = x has 0 as a very easy solution but cosx = x isn’t easy to find answer to

@DatBoi_TheGudBIAS

6 ай бұрын

​@@ponnshaa2007oh, I thought it was the phisics meme cuz u can basically assume sinx as x for small x

@biprorshighosh3880

6 ай бұрын

The defined relation is a absolute false Because here as said sin(x)=x Then cos(x)=√(1-x^2) where x=sin(x) So, x^2 is sin^2(x) As derived from the Pythagoras theorem.

@biprorshighosh3880

6 ай бұрын

Also Here it is assumed as a function and it is just Generally true.

I'm in the "Circles have one edge" camp, as that's the only thing that could make sense. it's not 0, as there is a clear line, and it's not infinity, because fuck you, that's why.

someone explain 1:15 pls

@GabriTell

7 ай бұрын

I think it's that the percentage approaches "0" and then "(x+1)²" actually equals "x²+1"

@onecommunistboi

7 ай бұрын

There are rings in which 2 = 0, making 2x = 0 for all x

10:14, I accept the challenge (I know it's a meme.. but still!) 2^((n-10)*(2^(21-n)))

@julianbruns7459

6 ай бұрын

Challenge failed.

@Anmol_Sinha

6 ай бұрын

​​​​@@julianbruns7459yeah sad, I was biased that the final answer won't have an n...(edit : I copied the question wrong lol)

@KAYOZAMVS

28 күн бұрын

Great that my answer matches

Why is the thumbnail so bad, im in 7th and haven't touched trig or calc besides a few vids and I graphed sin(x)=x and cos(x)=x and it was just a line. I also put in tan(x) and it looks worse than cos

@yjlom

7 ай бұрын

sin x = x ⇒ ∃ k ∈ ℤ : x = π k ; easy enough cos x = x ⇒ ∃ k ∈ ℤ : x = π k + a ; where a ≃ 0.7391, which I can't think of any way of calculating other than gradient descent

@julianbruns7459

7 ай бұрын

The value for x such that sin(x)=x is 0. The value for x such that cos(x)=x doesnt have a closed form and can only be aporoximated as roughly 0.739085

@sinox5

Ай бұрын

How do you even solve cos x = x

Can someone explain the one at 1:17?

@prabhakarsingh6821

7 ай бұрын

The second person saying (x+1)²=x²+1 wants to say that this equation is true when x=0

@angeldude101

7 ай бұрын

@@prabhakarsingh6821 It's also true when 2 = 0 (like in ℤ mod 2)

@giovanni1946

7 ай бұрын

In Z/2Z, (x + 1)^2 = x^2 + 1 because 2 = 0

@julianbruns7459

7 ай бұрын

Im pretty sure this is referring to a commutative ring of characteristic 2

---------------------

Definitely did not take any of this from r/mathmemes

🤓

I am in the first year of Math Degree, but it occurred to me that "=" could be defined in a very general way like this: "∀x,y∈Ω, x=y ↔ x∈{y} ∧ y∈{x}"

10:14 2^0.00000190734863281/2015.08559418 =~0

@sinox5

Ай бұрын

Thank you