Play Conflict of Nations for FREE on PC or Mobile: 💥con.onelink.me/kZW6/dfd0888c Receive an Amazing New Player Pack, only available for the next 30 days!

@pyeitme508

3 жыл бұрын

Meh prefer other games

@relentless5881

3 жыл бұрын

if US is attacked, the Philippines is bound for MDT, basically US can use its airspace or bases.

@holydutchlord3477

3 жыл бұрын

I used it to always play that

@ifureadthis_urgay

3 жыл бұрын

Sorry for not supporting you. I already played when simple history got sponsored by it and i used his link.

@apexkevv8904

3 жыл бұрын

Bro!! Wishful thinking!! It would go nuclear ☢️ before this could happen. The reason it would go nuclear is because China would have nothing to close but to destroy the other countries that participate in the invasion of China. Japan and some parts of the United States would cease to exist. China has too many attack submarines and missiles to sit and let their country be taken over.

The real war is always in the comments section.

@tandemcharge5114

3 жыл бұрын

Where the history illiterates fight it out

@beliveau4943

3 жыл бұрын

onggg

@Craisont

3 жыл бұрын

It's sad seeing how little some people truly know about history "those who don't understand history are doomed to repeat it"

@beyondreamtime420

3 жыл бұрын

Carson Rist , leader don’t study history will end up repeating history . If USA and China really go to war ! We all going to eat some big shit and say good bye to the life you have now. From my point of view China and USA are in the same boat . Try to build hate in the generations to come.

@shermanfirefly5410

3 жыл бұрын

@@Craisont And the ones who actually studied history can only watch the ones who didn't study repeating the history

Everyone in the comments section _definitely_ watched the whole video (including me)

@AbrahamLincoln4

3 жыл бұрын

23 minute long video, comment post 21 minutes ago.

@terrainvictus1210

3 жыл бұрын

2 minutes late but it's better than nothing I for my self actually watched the video but I skipped the sponsor.

@fcuagency2163

3 жыл бұрын

Im waiting for the angry chinese commenter who will claim they can take down america no problem

@jacobriverson3807

3 жыл бұрын

I’m still in the initial ad lol

@Raul_Menendez

3 жыл бұрын

Don't need to watch it. Already know the outcome. How? I'm a 5 Star General from the Kekistani Wars.

This has to be the funniest prediction I've ever watched thanks for the laughs

All I have to say is never, never under estimate your enemy and there are plenty of advantages and disadvantages on both sides, one thing for certain, we will all lose.

@loadedwraps7630

Жыл бұрын

Except the military industrial complex

“Don’t fight a battle if you gain nothing from winning” Erwin Rommel, WWII

@alphacentauri1760

3 жыл бұрын

Issue an embargo with all its allies and wait for a Chinese attack.

@williamblazkowicz5587

3 жыл бұрын

I wonder what A ww2 where Rommel was a us tank General like patton would be like.

@twentyonegrams8617

3 жыл бұрын

@@williamblazkowicz5587 The allies intentionally didn't take Hitler out because they were worried he'd be replaced with someone like Rommel I guess that tells you how they felt about Rommel as a military leader 😂 Respect.

@tony001212

3 жыл бұрын

​@@alphacentauri1760 almost all stuff we use are made in china, think again, you hardly can find sth not made in china, we as world are dependent on china like we it or not. they also produce almost the half of medicine produced in the world. an embargo will be suicidal for all countries trying to fight china. we created the monster, now we deal with it.

@stanley1620

3 жыл бұрын

@@tony001212 USA has been superpower for only 100 years. China had been superpower for thousands of years, so monster wasn't created by USA. Don't overestimate America.China recovers by her own hard work and intelligence.

popular joke in China: News reporter: Why do we send our army to Syria? The US: Because we suspect that they have weapon of mass destruction. News reporter: Why don't we start a war with China or Russia? The US: Because they really do have weapon of mass destruction.

@GodDragonLich

3 жыл бұрын

Just wait til the American government finds oil in China, bye bye CCP XD

@theicmn

3 жыл бұрын

@@GodDragonLich You do know the US exports far more oil than they import.

@trihermawan9553

3 жыл бұрын

@@GodDragonLich there's plenty of oil in Manchuria region of China, and bunches of coal to liquidise

@GodDragonLich

3 жыл бұрын

@@theicmn It’s called a joke.

@GodDragonLich

3 жыл бұрын

@@trihermawan9553 Yes I know, it’s called a joke.

Even if it were feasible to defeat China, with a conventional land army, the human cost would be enormous. Nobody would be okay with that.

@ssglbc1875

Жыл бұрын

It would be to defeat china in a Tawain war. Invading China would be impossible unless it got support from India because indias boarder and military is pretty good

@loadingnewads

Жыл бұрын

@@ssglbc1875 India is not able to fight against China at all!

@pear-zq1uj

11 ай бұрын

Invading china is impossible, the country is far too big, far too urbanized and dense and far too many people. It is literally impossible. Limited wars are the future. America and China fighting in Taiwan. India and Pakistan fighting in Kashmir. This is how big powers would fight, there is no point trying to invade each other directly because no one wins, it would be a stalemate.

I always remember a quote from the Vietnam war. "A bowl of rice and a AK47"

@CreatingAlong

Жыл бұрын

Guess we will be bringing in the Nukes again if they want to try and pull a Japan.

@Nicolae_Mew

Жыл бұрын

@@CreatingAlong I don't see a world where the USA invades let alone nukes China, it would turn the entire world against them.

@CreatingAlong

Жыл бұрын

@@Nicolae_Mew I do agree they will most likely surrender without it coming to that. But if they try to make us do a land invasion I cant see any other options besides nukes. (since US would lose a land invasion)

Nukes: no one wins and everyone lose

@otherpatrickgill

2 жыл бұрын

thank you! I'm not American and I'm not Chinese, I don't care who wins this massive dick-measuring contest they're having. I'm just a guy who lives nowhere near the pacific, who would be exceedingly grateful to not have radioactive shit fall on his head and kill him as a result of a war he cares nothing about.

@yehuiai8078

2 жыл бұрын

there will be no one left to win or lose with nukes.

@Naw662

2 жыл бұрын

China and US nuking each other and ending horribly, war never changes ig

@NorthernNorthdude91749

2 жыл бұрын

Nukes won't be used.

@williamshaneblyth

2 жыл бұрын

Nukes design and useage is quite a controlled war these days. 1 example the right size nuke detonated in high atmosphere is an EMP result. Fries silicon but doesn't kill biologicals. Nukes design and size can be incredibly small yes they can use giant ballistic units but that's not the way to win.

There's no winner in this conflict. The world would be devastated.

@coconutperson1985

2 жыл бұрын

You know you can like your own comment?

@nmxsanchez

2 жыл бұрын

@@coconutperson1985 ?

@Dylan-zm3ht

2 жыл бұрын

The winner is me.

@workphone303

2 жыл бұрын

Which is why the US would win, nobody wants global destruction. Most likely we'll fight them to the last Indian

@TheKCaryer

2 жыл бұрын

It would be very Aug 1914

Hope the world can truly change for the better with more harmonious cooperation and coexistence.

I was in the military 19D....any foreign military trying to invade another country right from the start said military is in a major disadvantage, the us Navy and Air Force would more than likely but not without taking large losses dismantle a majority of it's coastal defensive systems which would be great for our ground forces fighting a much larger army "number wise" in their backyard a location they know like the back of their hand not an impossible task to overcome but an extremely difficult task to overcome, the number of casualties would be massive.

I am here to watch basement military strategists argue with each other.

@simpleman4215

3 жыл бұрын

Ok, CCP dude.

@algalkin

3 жыл бұрын

They also are clueless on what "hypothetical" means and the whole point of Binkov's videos.

@MrBigCookieCrumble

3 жыл бұрын

What a coincidence, that's my favorite passtime as well!

@hongyangjiang4976

3 жыл бұрын

@@simpleman4215 thank you for introducing me to join ccp. It is cpc actually. But I guess I will pass.

@hongyangjiang4976

3 жыл бұрын

@@MrBigCookieCrumble I hope those tough guys won't freak out when their wifi is down.

Let’s just hope both of these countries leaders actually think before they start something.

@davu5637

2 жыл бұрын

Yahweh has bought back their evil upon them, He will destroy them in their wickedness.

I hope 🤞 your chants be real for days to come 🙏

Just because we’re the strongest nation in the history of man does not mean that we can invade a country by ourself. Invading has always been more difficult than attacking, you people in the comments are not very bright and it shows.

@armoredwarrior7020

Жыл бұрын

历史上最强大的国家是英国

We can all agree that the comment section is more toxic than the mustard and chlorine gases used in WW1.

today i realized that most your viewers are under age 10

@spectre1849

3 жыл бұрын

Age racist

@doug814

3 жыл бұрын

🤣

@Lostname53

3 жыл бұрын

Deadass they are all anti-america and don't understand how modern day works the past don't mean shit you can't compare modern day US to 80s US and 80s china to modern day china. Especially when 80s china was to busy killing each other 😂

@robertgittings8662

3 жыл бұрын

@@Lostname53 *PLEASE get out of Okinawa and GO FIGHT IN YOUR OWN COUNTRY, USA. Don't destory Asia please. USA is bad enough, don't sabotage other countries 🙏.*

@shingyanling1856

3 жыл бұрын

@@robertgittings8662 realistically, they cannot fight in their own country. no chinese military base is near US. I'm chinese and i think the US is pretty good

Wonder how many people in here have actually looked through the sights of a rifle? 🤣

They wouldn't try to invade China. It's just not possible for the war not to turn nuclear with two nuclear powers.

Seeing comments below this vid, I realized why people say Americans are crazy about wars and invasion.

@dzane243

Жыл бұрын

Everybody gangsta until someone starts to lose family members. It's all fun and games until hundreds or even thousands of nukes are deployed. Most Americans don't understand the cruelty of war because they never faced a full-on invasion.

@americancountryball2077

Жыл бұрын

It’s practically our culture we’ve been at war for most of our countries existence

@marksanders2168

Жыл бұрын

Zombieism. Lol.

@marksanders2168

Жыл бұрын

@@americancountryball2077 yeah a "culture" spiraling down sooner than later.

@user-ez9en7vk2z

Жыл бұрын

If you study history every country starts wars somewhere sometime. If they bomb the bully china it feels totally justified.

comments are filled with lots of Ex 4 star generals i see

@MarcillaSmith

3 жыл бұрын

Even someone rejected at MEPS should be able to see that this sounds like Cold War era strategy. I enjoy these videos, and it is _despite_ the fact that this is not how the USA and China -are- would be fighting one another

@valiantstallion

3 жыл бұрын

China doesn't have any Allies

@valiantstallion

3 жыл бұрын

@Haziq Rosli china and Russia are NOT allies. Guaranteed.

@user-js9zt3hv2x

3 жыл бұрын

@@valiantstallion Yes, but this does not mean that Russia will not do anything

@valiantstallion

3 жыл бұрын

@@user-js9zt3hv2x Russia plays chess, not checkers.

Anglo-Saxons always thought about how to invade other countries, but now they are ambitious enough to consider ways to invade a nuclear power.

@nahashongichine4877

Жыл бұрын

Let the Americans never try to attack china, xi jinping has severally warned Biden not to pray with fire

@BuddhaWho777

Жыл бұрын

You have no idea what an Anglo Saxons is do you.

@yuhuagao4858

Жыл бұрын

👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍

They couldn't even conquer Korea with help of 50+ countries. Heck they couldn't even conquer Afghanistan.

@hs_fi8857

11 ай бұрын

we did "conquer" Afghanistan..we held it for 20 years then we left

@finmacleod8383

11 ай бұрын

​@@hs_fi8857It began falling before you left

@hs_fi8857

11 ай бұрын

@@finmacleod8383 yet we held onto it for 20 years? the country fell apart on our horrible leave

@csrupbxpan2711

11 ай бұрын

@@hs_fi8857 It took 20 years and spent $2t to replace the Taliban with......the Taliban.

@timeames2509

10 ай бұрын

@@finmacleod8383 Americans always Dominate the body count in every conflict!! 🇺🇲

What I've learned from watching a lot of Binkov videos is that most countries can't successfully invade other countries without taking massive losses unless they are many times more powerful. Defensive advantage in geography and logistics is often huge. Especially if the attacking country needs many millions of troops. In this war, the whole global economy would lose.

@Chris-es3wf

2 жыл бұрын

That won't stop the CCP from taking everyone down with them. Olympic genocide in full swing... after murdering 100million fulong gong

@TheDoorspook11c

2 жыл бұрын

The day The US masters the non nuclear point and field emp, game over. Disabling nuclear capabilities for even an hr would be the end for them both.

@starkiller578

10 ай бұрын

True. It’s hard to invade a country without taking massive losses. That’s why america didn’t invade Japan

I recommend USA resolve Traffic problem in California First.

@---wc2zp

3 жыл бұрын

Or the war against racism first

@vicvega4415

3 жыл бұрын

China lost to them too a while before we got involved and that was in the Vietcongs early stage when they actually were like farmers😂

@vicvega4415

3 жыл бұрын

Oh so China didn’t get their asses kicked when they leave but the Vietnam war ended in a stalemate and us leaving and we got our asses kicked😂

@vicvega4415

3 жыл бұрын

China’s way more racist then America

@DjCalliber

3 жыл бұрын

It’s funny cus that’s mainly due to Chinese drivers

@binkov, do a video on US invading, holding, and occupying Hainan Island.

@presumedeagle10

5 ай бұрын

The islands they already control?

They had a very hard time fighting the ill equipped Chinese Infantry during the Korean war; imagine now.

@pykemid3954

Жыл бұрын

video complete jokeeee

Last I checked, the whole NATO coalition fighters left Afghanistan.

@TheoGottwald

2 жыл бұрын

Of course they will do everything USA asks them to do. Its like the dog and his TAIL.

@derlasercrafterwally4342

2 жыл бұрын

@@TheoGottwald they are forced to. They currently do not have the capabilities to supply their troops and manage everything on their own. They needed the US logistics and now that they are gone they had to go aswell.

@ushopelife7538

2 жыл бұрын

Allies NATO United Nation Western Powers & Axis CSTO Eastern Powers Defectors Plan To Invade China Battle of Hainan 16:38-17:31,18:09/18:41 20:52 Invading China From 7 Direction

@ushopelife7538

2 жыл бұрын

Allies NATO United Nation Western Powers & Axis CSTO Eastern Powers Defectors Plan To Invade China Battle of Hainan 16:38-17:31,18:09/18:41 20:52 Invading China From 7 Direction

@pinchmesh2856

2 жыл бұрын

Afghanistan has a cultural problem, not a governmental problem. There is no cure. They can't be helped.

None of the big 3 can just invade each other and just win in this day and age.

@jayceecirelos7943

3 жыл бұрын

Of you look only in technology it is impossible but china dont know they are on a suicide mission usa can hire hackers to immobalize china's pfffttt equipment... usa may use emp that may help to immobalize china. for usa and its allies to go in... Have you heard of ilove virus that immobalize the world by one person?

@abinmathew8983

3 жыл бұрын

@@jayceecirelos7943 are you 13

@Echani3007

3 жыл бұрын

@@abinmathew8983 haha he is😂

@user-ob1bx8qm9q

3 жыл бұрын

@@jayceecirelos7943 how smart u are！ now we know it.thank you😅

@xiahuang6366

3 жыл бұрын

@@jayceecirelos7943 You should take that to Hollywood where it belongs

The time when US take Beijing, Washington DC is already gone with the wind.

@xuezechen5749

Жыл бұрын

with the DongFeng

@jacklouie8096

Жыл бұрын

This is a good one

@Juan-qu4oj

Жыл бұрын

China could never take DC

Pretty sure the carrier's will eat the hypersonic missiles first....

last I recall the Pentagon said they were uncertain of winning a war in the Pacific let alone a conqueat of China but I'm so glad we have so many American war generals in the chat

@mikeriley7296

3 жыл бұрын

War General Mike here ... ;) you like so many others seem to think it is US against China!? It is not! It is Taiwan, India, British, Japan, US and potentially others ...

@davidfraley4286

3 жыл бұрын

The US cannot afford to let China take Taiwan, despite not having a defense treaty. The US/Quad alliance is the only country that can stand up against China. The CCP (Chinese Communist Party) is on the verge of global domination. If the US/Quad alliance dos nothing other countries will say the US ether could not or would not stop the CCP and so they cannot. They would have to aqueous to all the CCPs demands and eventually be controlled by the CCP. This used to be called the domino effect. In time the CCP would become so powerful the US would have to do so too. The CCP would spread its propaganda/censorship/surveillance state all over the world and no one would have freedom or democracy. Freedom of speech would disappear globally. Concentration camps would proliferate worldwide. > IT WOULD START LIKE THIS: The CCP assumes the US will help Taiwan. The PLA (People’s Liberation Army) attacks Taiwan, the US Navy, and US basses in and around the SCS (South China Sea) preemptively. The US/Quad alliance destroys china's navy, takes the artificial military islands, and lays sedge to mainland China with the hope of regime change or at least containment. The US maintains constant military and economic pressure on the CCPs” Military Industrial Complex” with standoff weapons. In time the CCP anti-aircraft capability might be degraded to the point where less expensive and more effective gravity bombs could be used. With their massive numerical advantage invading mainland China is not an option as it would result in massive casualties and if the CCP elite felt threatened risk a nuclear exchange. The CCP would welcome casualties to trim their population. This would only make them stronger as they already have more people than their land will support (1.4 billion, four times the US population and four times the number of mouths to feed with the same amount of land). China is not self-sufficient in oil, food, iron ore, rare earth ore and many other things. China would become another North Korea. A negotiated peace or even a cease fire would not work as the CCP would not honor any deal it made, rearm, and try again. The only thing that would stop the CCP is the inability to attack. To stay in power and preserve their luxurious lifestyle the CCP would become even more vicious and repressive then they already are. Hopefully, this would result in a revolt that brings down the CCP, vastly improving the quality of life of the Chinese people. The war might go cold in time all by itself without any type of agreement or declared end. There would be no exit strategy. Containment would be the order of the day or maybe the decade or even longer, leaving The Quad free to attack specific targets whenever necessary and close the Strait of Malacca to the CCP. With all deference to Binkov’s Battlegrounds the object of the exercise would be to protect Taiwan, stop CCP expansionism, keep the international sea lanes open, and eliminate the threat to and theft of resources from other countries, NOT the conquering of china. The CCP is watching the US military now free of INF Treaty restrictions reorganize, build capability and alliances in the SCS. Maybe this will be enough to deter them.

@Julian-bg8rd

3 жыл бұрын

@@mikeriley7296 the governments of korea and japan may side with the usa but the ppl are not, the new generation prefer china over the usa

@thinkingaloud5379

3 жыл бұрын

@@davidfraley4286 You must be smoking weed when writing this crap!

@ericwang7959

3 жыл бұрын

@@mikeriley7296 It would be hard to convince other countries to join in a coalition against china, especially with Japan and Korea, since they are very close and would be the first target. They are also economically tied to china, so they have a lot to lose and little to gain in such war. I'm sure Taiwan would join but since they are so close to the mainland, their effectiveness is going to be very limited. As for India, it might have some local advantage over Tibet, but effectively supplying over the the Tibetan plateau would be almost impossible.

“国虽大，好战必亡；天下虽安，忘战必危” The first part is for us, and the rest is for China.

@jxzhang7157

2 жыл бұрын

right

@xyc8315

2 жыл бұрын

其用战也胜，久则钝兵挫锐，攻城则力屈，久暴师则国用不足。夫钝兵挫锐，屈力殚货，则诸侯乘其弊而起，虽有智者不能善其后矣。故兵闻拙速，未睹巧之久也。夫兵久而国利者，未之有也。故不尽知用兵之害者，则不能尽知用兵之利也。孙子兵法说打战就是要冲着赢去的，打久了大家都累，攻坚战疲软，战争动员太久了国内空虚。没兵没钱没物资其他国家就趁势而起，就算有一百万智囊团也无力回天。所以打战都是一下子推过去，没听说过打得久能打好的。看看历史那场持久战有真正的获利方？所以不知道用兵的弊端，怎么知道用兵的意义呢？

As a retired US Army Tank Platoon Sergeant, there is no way the American Army can successfully invade China… The same that China can never invade the US. An actual invasion would require the US to go onto a total war footing, which would include starting up the draft AND having at least United Kingdom, Australia and Japan to be 100% committed to the fight. I don’t think South Korea would jump in, but the US would immediately withdraw our combat units from South Korea AND verbally weaken our commitment in defending South Korean from a North Korean attack, which would place South Korea in a jam since she would have to basically go onto a war footing to protect her own borders. As for Canada, she currently doesn’t have enough combat power, Naval and Air power to really matter. France, Germany, and most of Europe would stay out, but we would pull our combat units out of Europe and telling them not to count on a 100% commitment or an immediate and massive American forces to be deployed to NATO to beat back a Russian attack. We would match French and German numbers that they commit to the fight. In a war, there is no need to invade China since the US can sink her Navy, mash her Air Force, destroy her coastal missile/radar defenses and cripple her harbors and ports. Plus, the US would attack her satellites as well. Yes, China would put up one hell of a fight and would cripple the US military in return. As for those Chinese manmade islands in the South China Sea, they would be attacked and cut off from Chinese reinforcements AND I would bet that Filipino Marines and Rangers, along with Vietnamese Naval Infantry will seize these islands that LEGALLY lay within areas under their control before being stolen by the Chinese. Both the Philippines and Vietnam would receive American Naval support, but they would not join in any other operations or attacks. The wild card is India, but doing the math, India would sit it out. Any fight between the United States and China would mainly be a Naval and Air fight. Both the US Army and Marines would play a minor role unless the mistake was made to invade.

@loadingnewads

9 ай бұрын

sir, things changed, China currently has the most lethal missiles and better radars than USA I’m not bluffing but in fact Chinese military is extremely good when it’s doing a defense, it seems to believe that its missiles are future, so now we all know that it will lunch hundreds of hypersonic missiles from its mainland and they will destroy military bases in first island Chain and SK, Japan in minutes (actually they even have some naval based hypersonic missiles) and I believe that the US won’t take advantage in air combat either, the F/A 18s can not outcompete J16 (basically SU27+filled with Chinese techs and engines), and F35s also have problem: they can not arrive in the battlefield quickly enough before J20 wipe out the tankers and awacs(Chinese awacs are also more advanced now, why don’t you guys update weapons more often?????) But a brutal and costly damned war won’t happen if the US don’t intervene Taiwan affairs militarily… and for army: I REALLY WANT TO KNKW WHY THERE ARE STILL SOME PEOPLE THINK CN AND US CAN USE THEIR ARMY ACROOS AN ENTIRE PACIFIC)

@mrg8890

8 ай бұрын

Even with all that. The US could never land one soldier on Chinese soil.

How unaware other countries are of the will of the American people who in almost every war fought an uphill battles that was supposed to be impossible but we make it possible. We may lose battles but never the war

@gtramerica4565

Жыл бұрын

I’m saying ! American will to fight is greater than any other country because we actually have freedom lol plus we’ve proven in 2 world wars our industrial might to produce ships and guns and ammo

@edwinvermeulen8187

Жыл бұрын

i'll just summarize the ones after WWII otherwise the list will become way to long: Korea (1950-1953), Bay of pigs (1961), Vietnam (1955-1975), Laos (1959-1975), Cambodja (1967-1975) , Lebanon (1982-1984) Somalia (1992-1995) Bosnia (1992-1995) Croatia (1992-1995) Afghanistan (2001-2021) Yemen (2002-Present) Syria (2014-Present) Its good to be patriotic, its better to be realistic

@damienaujla4649

Жыл бұрын

where you learn that? some Hollywood movies you watched ?

@dwniu2000

Жыл бұрын

really，do we live on the same earth?

I do not want to play Fallout in reality.

@MICKEYISLOWD

3 жыл бұрын

Neither does the rest of the world. Don't feel lonely it terrifies me too.

@zeflute4586

3 жыл бұрын

@@MICKEYISLOWD But we can collect caps together! And we can try mutating sometime~

@giedriusgu7033

3 жыл бұрын

@@zeflute4586 We will also be able to mod it, make the reality look like a jungle in no time

@wawolff6085

3 жыл бұрын

You do not understand fallout.

@Saboguin

3 жыл бұрын

I don’t wanna ruin the joke or anything but the difference here is that, the nukes from fallout 4 were pretty small compared to modern day nukes. You could survive the ones from fallout. You won’t with today’s nukes.

Why fight a war there when we can fight a war in the comment section?

@kevinyaucheekin1319

3 жыл бұрын

May all wars be fought there.

forgetting all the long range missiles, including some hypersonic ones. assuming magically at that moment, nuclear somehow is still on the table. and interruption to world manufacturing and supply chains. a video on a full scale implication would be more fun to watch

We need to develop our own tech more and design Drone Jets, Tanks, Subs and Drone Solider Bots, even if it is similar to a little armored rover with a 30 or 50 Cal mounted. To make up for manpower we need to have a Drone Army as well.

Keep in mind that China is not Veitnam Afghanistan Iraq Syria or Pakistan..... Easier said than done

@assgrabber5473

3 жыл бұрын

Why'd you mention pakistan it was never invaded

@cho2583

3 жыл бұрын

agreed, its no longer a proxy war or to invade a third world country and toppling it's govt, it would be horrifying

@grathesus4114

3 жыл бұрын

@@assgrabber5473 it was.

@assgrabber5473

3 жыл бұрын

@@grathesus4114 when?

@assgrabber5473

3 жыл бұрын

@@grathesus4114 invading a country with nukes would be suicide

I love how this channel is neutral in every comparison and is not biased.

@drjay7596

3 жыл бұрын

Yes, it is difficult to find any unbiased videos and opinions these days. It is amazing that this video remains neutral in the modern day, and I respect the creator a lot.

@brianpayne4549

3 жыл бұрын

The irony is strong, with this one lol

@ayan13

3 жыл бұрын

True

@doge3169

Жыл бұрын

The comments tho….

Wars are fought for economic reasons, so trying to take on the second biggest economic superpower and the second strongest military superpower is not worth the risks and the potential consequences.

Good luck !

Plot twist the Russian accent guy who made this video is actually part of the Russian government trying to stir up shit between the us and china to sit back and eat popcorn

@erfgtdsfsdf6993

2 жыл бұрын

I think russias best interest is to prevent this war from happening and just benefit from peking washington rivalry. However with chinese or american supremacy established in east asia there could be difficult times for Moscow. China grew arrogant, aggressive and hungry for resources (not unsimilar to US actually...) over years and russias far east might be the next dish on their menu.

@andrewmckenzie292

2 жыл бұрын

Democrats: Better get the whole US government to look into that.

Man so many generals and defence experts in comment section tho.

@vr-gv2ks

3 жыл бұрын

Can US Army take Thaliban .. ? Now it is negotiating to give up .....

@BeachBoi1000

3 жыл бұрын

Special Forces are beaten so badly in Somali... experts are overrated

@ifardedandshidded5519

3 жыл бұрын

@@vr-gv2ks it’s not that the us army is weak lol it’s that the us hasn’t adapted to fighting against Guerilla war. A big problem for the us is sure they got weapons that can shoot enemies with like pin point accuracy, but the issue is when they don’t know where the enemy is, cuz they hiding in the population. They don’t got uniforms or anything, they’re essentially civilians with weapons. A lot of times they aren’t sure if it’s the enemy or just a civilian and may hesitate. Also even with all this, the us still wins the majority of battles against them, but obviously in their home country people won’t want to give up and will fight til the last person, and eventually the us is gonna say hey stop sending people over we been doing this for years and we haven’t won so the army leave. I realize now I probably could’ve just said that last like 2 sentences there and that would be a sufficient answer, but whatever lol

@vr-gv2ks

3 жыл бұрын

@@ifardedandshidded5519 , sure... us army was not weak. But could not win ! 1.5M Vietnamese died. Almost the numbers of wirld wide Covid19 victims. For "what purpose" did American kill, bom with orange-agent, napalm bom, Vietnamese .. ?

@dlobrown3673

3 жыл бұрын

You don't need to be a general to understand deliverable nuclear weapons. If the US wanted to take China at Any cost they could. But it would never be worth it

Nuclear weapons? Do you think this is prior to 1945?

Can’t we all just be friends? Let’s share the earth.

@deannekliene2673

Жыл бұрын

Egos won't allow it....

US: Lands troops in China China: You fool! You fell victim to one of the classic blunders!

@memer7987

3 жыл бұрын

*cough* Japanese naval invasions succeeded

@Raul_Menendez

3 жыл бұрын

@@memer7987 The difference being that China at that point of time was still fighting a Civil War. And had a teenager ruling the country...

Nooooo binkov you just set off a war in the comments between Chinese 50cent Simps , and American Keyboard warriors 😕

@VisibilityFoggy

3 жыл бұрын

It's a rainy day on the U.S. east coast. We need something to do.

@95keat

3 жыл бұрын

The signal fire has been lit

@tboltaq2

3 жыл бұрын

Already engaged.... Not really much off a fight. They are toast before they start...

@sssood26

3 жыл бұрын

I like the term keyboard warriors!!!

@rc59191

3 жыл бұрын

Simp has lost its meaning because of people like you throwing it around and using it in the wrong context.

No US citizens should go fight in any foreign war tell the politician’s to learn how to use the weapons and take their families and do it themselves. Stay home and guard your homes and communities.

Yes ,lets do it

The only thing he can’t account for is the ramped-up production in a scenario like this. The US and China would be shitting out equipment by now

@beliveau4943

3 жыл бұрын

thats true although the us in ww2 vs us in this scenario prob wont be the same

@Stoic_Zoomer

3 жыл бұрын

@@beliveau4943 indeed if anything it would be even more insane. Every man and women would be on the battlefield, the production line, or in the field growing food.

@AaronDrake22

3 жыл бұрын

Sir Dude Dude it’s gonna be like a video game first until all the missiles are used up gonna be the biggest scary thing anyone could ever imagine and it can happen as fast as it takes to spark ⚡️ a match

@Stoic_Zoomer

3 жыл бұрын

@@AaronDrake22 M.A.D. will be the death of us all. Its the only reason china is safe right now

@johnpatz8395

3 жыл бұрын

Gavin Visser the issue there is that current systems can’t really be created as rapidly as they were in WW2, there are just to many steps in the supply chain. Look how long it took the market to correct for a shortage of computer RAM, and that was without two major markets, and manufacturers, fighting a war

I love how everyone in the comment section are military experts.

@MarcillaSmith

3 жыл бұрын

As a poli sci major with a military science minor, I can tell you that this is nothing compared to the people who consider themselves experts on politics

@ChadVulpes

3 жыл бұрын

@@hugejackedman7423 What does it have to do with anything?

@Khelsenlei

3 жыл бұрын

@@ChadVulpes because in politic, we can't see who your buddy. If you didn't carefull, it's not your enemy kill you. But your friend

@ChadVulpes

3 жыл бұрын

Khelsen Lei You’re not making much sense.

@spongememefunnypants9101

3 жыл бұрын

Your right bro, i got so much to argue with🙄🙄

Much of those fighting numbers were only trained to March in parades.

No way would this conflict not turn into a global nuclear war. Thus no one can truly win.

China watching this video like “Write that down write that down”

@TotallyNotALolicon

3 жыл бұрын

Salim That’s up to the people to decide

@TotallyNotALolicon

3 жыл бұрын

Hernando Malinche My parents told me the same thing when I said I was going to college

@user-rm5jj9qw9t

3 жыл бұрын

You aren't funny

“Stop saying quotes I never mentioned”-Albert Einstein

Thanks you so much america. For helping the philippines. God bless america..

Just because you CAN do something doesn’t mean you should. I can buy a crack rock the size of a bowling ball and smoke it as fast as I can. Could it kill me? Maybe. Should I have done it in the first place? Probably not.

The more you dive into the comment section the more armchair generals making entire essays explaining how the US could destroy China with whipped cream you see

@sword6381

3 жыл бұрын

and also the other people who somehow think China would easily win or such

@John_Doe448

3 жыл бұрын

@@sword6381 well, not easily, but the advantage clearly lays on the defenders side

@v8vince761

3 жыл бұрын

@David Lee ok wumao(chinese people paid 50cents for every post/comment glorifying the CCP or china)

@John_Doe448

3 жыл бұрын

@David Lee haha on point

@somerandomguy7068

3 жыл бұрын

@@v8vince761 you have made some pretty cringeworthy comments

We would definite need either South Korea or India. There is no way we could invade the Chinese mainland. Even then other countries would get involved. It would be a shitshow .

@mr.normalguy69

3 жыл бұрын

No need for a mainland invasion or taking over any Chinese islands other than the ones in south China Sea. You see, China is heavily dependent on exports, all US and its allies has to do is cut China from the rest of the world and then play defensive and wait till China either tries to play aggressive, sue for peace or finds its economy devastated. Not a win for the US, but huge loss for China.

@mxn1948

3 жыл бұрын

south korea isn't going to willingly join that war, doing so will reignite a new korea war(or rather, korean campaign of ww3) koreans will see heavy losses and devastation of their territory regardless of who won. only way it would do so if it was attacked. india would probably love to make a move on its borders but even if it won the combat there, thats about the extent of it, india has zero power projection capabilities and invading china proper would involve a supply route over the Himalayas, no way they get more than 100 km(probably close to 20km) into Tibet before they run out of supply and run into heavy chinese resistance.

@halioshaligon8678

3 жыл бұрын

@@mxn1948 India has some power projection capabilities, with 2 aircraft carriers and some supply ships. As for supply over the himalayas, it would only be truly difficult if China were to destroy the roads and bridges it has spent years painstakingly building up, and even then, replacement roads don't take too long to build, and tibet is quite flat. The biggest issue for India would be a two-front war as Pakistan would attack from the West, which would occupy 1/3 of the army in defence, or if India was to defeat Pakistan, then half of the army would be needed until Pakistan is conquered, meaning any serious progress over the himalayas would be impossible until then.

@mxn1948

3 жыл бұрын

@Wuanslm yes, but they still have to get there. currently even american sea lift capabilities can only send ~50k well armed troops+support vehicles in one landing, who then have to fight 200k+ chinese. this is only possible if a large part of the world all fought china and over a couple of years, outproduced china then destroyed its navy then airforce then launched the largest sea born invasion in history making D-day look like a small skirmish. I highly doubt such a unified force would fight china, like why would europe go join this war or why would russia fight china for some reason. even then many millions will die, an actual occupation is going to be a nightmare. Well its all moot anyhow, things will go nuclear well before then.

@jsn1252

3 жыл бұрын

The ROC would be a bigger help than either of them. Being able to call it a resumption of the Chinese civil war and merely assisting the nationalist allies could be devastating to the mainland's cohesion, maybe even break the party completely. Not to mention there's already effectively a beachhead in Hong Kong.

I am not sure but US army couldn't fight against Afghanistan villager army let alone fight with China.

@kingnothing5678

Жыл бұрын

Yes. If USA can't beat dudes in Gucci flipflops then I doubt they can beat China in a standup fight.

@sound_tsunami8436

Жыл бұрын

We couldn’t beat Afghanistan villagers because we didn’t go through and round up every civilians and kill them. That’s the only way to win a gorilla war.

@taykokhuat

Жыл бұрын

@@sound_tsunami8436 Don't kept making excuses after losing 3 wars started by your chocolate army and cheese government.

@sound_tsunami8436

Жыл бұрын

@@taykokhuat hahahahaha. What great English you have. Someone must be mad that there country has collapsed multiple times in history and is set to collapse again!!

@sound_tsunami8436

Жыл бұрын

@@taykokhuat nato would steamroll through your army like the mongol empire.

Quality vs Quantity Made in America vs Made in China

@taajdaarhashmi4593

3 жыл бұрын

Yes but USA also has quantitative advantage along with qualitative in some aspects

@mxn1948

3 жыл бұрын

i think this is something he actually didn't consider. the video talks about a war that is longer than a year yet does not model the kind of industrial preparation both side would make before and during such an event. for example, china is the world's largest industrial power, it can, at this very moment, out produce any country. the US has a large industrial base as well. so those tanker losses would get replaced, those Chinese planes losses..will get replaced. the air war is going to last the whole war if china doesn't use them too much, too far outside of it coast there is going to be no total air domination. and taking Hainan is unlikely, far more so than presented, china's land based anti-ship capabilities are unmatched, with the air war undecided those slow defenseless landing ships are going to eat a face full of missiles what what makes it will face 300k well supplied chinese troops. But the end conclusion is probably close to real life, the us isn't going to take china on land without a massive alliance. and im sure some would join, like japan or Australia, but i doubt some others would be willingly joining unless they were attacked, such as vietnam or south korea, some members of europe might jump in, such as the uk, but those would probably be a minor help to the us at best and most would stay out, unless of course it was china that started the war but china has been careful not to, only 3 locations it might attack, india, taiwan if it declared independence, or a north Korean scenario, none of which is an attack on a European ally.

@mxn1948

3 жыл бұрын

@@Carthodon Its like all of you forget just how large china is. china isn't japan. even right now china is the worlds 6th largest oil producer and can(do) get more from russia and the stans even if the sea trade is cut off, with civilian usaged limited and export business disrupted, it would have tons for the war industry. china is also the 3rd largest iron ore producer, again limit civilian usage/exports(china is the world's largest steel exporter) and there is plenty for the military, and food-wise china is 99% self sufficient in basic staple foods (this is an actual policy), most of the imports are luxury or for animal feed. so they will eat way less meat, thats not gonna kill off production

@mxn1948

3 жыл бұрын

@@Carthodon most of the oil is used for civilian cars and export business, without/limit those and there is plenty, i literally just said this last comment, you didn't read or what?. iron, is again for export(a part of steel or manufactured goods) there is plenty of production inside china if civilian use is limited and exports halted. neither iron nor oil supply would need to be made up and this kind of scenario is a total war scenario, nothing better to unite the population than a large scary external enemy that is invading you. compared to being conquered i bet that living like it 1995 is not an issue for 99% of its population. simply put, lost of iron and oil imports is going to do nothing to cripple Chinese war capabilities even in a multiple year long war.

@mxn1948

3 жыл бұрын

@@Carthodon brain drain because other places have better opportunity, the US DOES have some of the best schools in the world and it easier to get into than the best chinese school if you have money. Trump is doing his very best to change that by making it much harder for Chinese students. this isnt unique to china, other places from india to taiwan to turkey all like to go to us/uk for education, hell even kim fatty of north korea was schooled in switzerland. this is not because most people dont like their country, they just have better opportunities else where. and a us invasion of china, especially if china was not the one to start a war would absolutely enrage its population. or do you think most americans would not fight or do something as benign as eat less meat if the Chinese invaded the us? i find the very notion that you think a population of people in a war to defend their country from invasion by a openly hostile power would rather commit treason/surrender without a fight simply because they would have to eat less meat, drive less and maybe cant get a new tv they wanted, completely laughable.

Binkov: Most of those SAM's could be concentrated in a pretty small area. Also Binkov: draws line on entire Chinese coastline.

@danielhughes5932

3 жыл бұрын

AWAKS my boyyyyyy. Also 250 hornets raptors and lightning going Mach 2 while tomahawks from destroyers and sub batteries destroy their defense infrastructure and THOUSANDS of decoy missiles overrun the system SAMs won't be as effective as they would be against another nation. It of course was an alliance offensive but just look at the air campaign that opened desert storm... the United States can outperform even that seemless victory by itself these days

Its one thing to have lots of equipment but another having enough manpower to operate it. Logistic will be a huge determining factor.

@lolitsajoke77

6 ай бұрын

They have multiple assets to do that. I hate war and fighting but the US military is a god like force that no other country would stand a chance to it. Our funding and weapons alone lets the Ukraine hold off a nuclear sticks supposed military power.

@MiddleKingdom305

8 күн бұрын

The problem is that the U.S. is already facing a crisis volunteering people for the military. The U.S. will need to draft up to 40 million soldiers to do anything to China.

basically china is focusing on defense and they are closing the gap

It's not 1939. Everybody is Rommel until the nukes start hitting.

@sandymilne224

3 жыл бұрын

Nobody uses nukes anymore. That’s old technology. Outdated and cooks the chickens too much. 😁

@rodfel2001

3 жыл бұрын

Now, you're talking about a great General, and it's a pity that lunatic drog abuser did not listen to him ... and he was not a nazi, what makes me like him even more ...

@AE_AnarchistAlexcianEmpire69Bi

3 жыл бұрын

@Rodfel Deuxmilleun Rommel Had Similar Views To Nazis, Similar Backstory To Hitler As Well.

@rodfel2001

3 жыл бұрын

@@AE_AnarchistAlexcianEmpire69Bi No wonder that lunatic S.O.B. killed the Wehrmach Greatest Infantry General he could count on. Well, it's the value on the ground that wins war, but the brain moves the troops ... and Carporal Hitler was not smart enough to listen to Guderian, Rommel and Paulus ...

Ah yes, the angry comments in broken English. A staple of any Binkov video

@yiyangqin4527

3 жыл бұрын

Well I don't say much angry comment in here. And also Most of my friends including me not angry at all. Why should we? China still need progressing that is true and in the video the US did cost a lot to invade china with high possiblity still not win. By the way just something I need to say, Chinese' first language is not English. So if you wanna point someone whose first language is not even yours and say they have grammatical mistake you better consider something at first: Do you even capable to understand other ones single word in their language? If you cannot even understand what others said it is quite ridiculous to laughing at others' grammatical mistake

@Not_actually_a_commie

3 жыл бұрын

@@yiyangqin4527 I'm aware that the majority of people watching Binkov are perfectly reasonable and are just here to enjoy the content. It's not a jab at you or anyone else personally, just a joke.

I have no idea about that because US couldn't even take on north Vietnam

@who7129

Жыл бұрын

Neither could China 🤨

@SONOFTHESUN-rc8uv

Жыл бұрын

@@who7129Why did Vietnam withdraw from Cambodia

This needs a reboot

Moral of the story: never get involved with a land war in Asia.

@slaughterchainsaw

3 жыл бұрын

A lesson the Japanese army learned the hard way

@Mahbu

3 жыл бұрын

@Finn Hansen I think you're taking the wrong lesson away from Vietnam and Korea. . Korea's lesson was over ambition and a general distaste in the possibility of triggering another world war. While MacArthur wanted all of Korea under the auspices of the west, many others were content with two Koreas. . Vietnam was an issue of no real mission or goal. No clear objective. "Kill the other side" has its uses is not the be all or end all. Especially when a lot of the people didn't want us there and saw us as just more colonizers. The US only got involved to help France and fight communism. . and the American people really didn't give a shit about that. Not in the long run.

@lukasg4807

3 жыл бұрын

@Finn Hansen didn't lose. Neither side won, or there would be 1 Korea.

@lukasg4807

3 жыл бұрын

@Finn Hansen they didn't stop there because they didn't want to go further, rather because it wasn't worth it. Both sides decided it was good enough, and completely accomplishing their goals wasn't worth the cost.

@Roguephilsopher

3 жыл бұрын

@Todd Raine I was actually quoting from The Princess Bride, but yes, that is also true

Hi Binkov. One important factor that should go into your model is oil. As was shown in WW2, oil limitations severely crippled Nazi Germany's ability to maintain both wartime production and fuel for its fighting vehicles and planes. In peacetime, China's economy consumes 13 million barrels per day (B/D) of oil. Of this amount, 5 million is produced domestically (largely concentrated in Heilongjiang province); 1.8 million B/D is sent from Russia by pipeline, which totals 6.8 million B/D. That means that 6.2 million B/D...roughly 48%...is shipped in by sea route via the Malacca Strait, a serious choke-point. Within a month of the assembly of US Navy assets in that area (an area free from Chinese defense), the US could simply cut off half of China's oil supply.

@SkinnerBeeMan

3 жыл бұрын

Food is a much larger issue. If you'll read half the reason for genocide in ww2 was limited food stocks to continue the war. Farming then was more manpower intensive tho, and stalin had destroyed agriculture in Ukraine. Add in drafting all the farm help and out see this is a slippery slope. In 1944 corn was $7 a bushel. It's 3.50 today. But the point to make is I don't think China could survive a long drawn out action as their biggest asset (population) is actually their biggest weakness. Can they survive without protein imports? I don't know. But if they all cross the ocean to get there the american navy is in a stronger position to disrupt trade on deep water than china is to secure those routes outside of shallow water. Add in the british ex empire navies, nato, local navies etc, I just don't know where those soybeans will come from or how they can expect to get to china.

@Matt-mt2vi

3 жыл бұрын

Unless Russia did that for the US I don't think that would happen and the US would not attack the Pipeline even on China side of the Pipeline. The processing plants yes. Pipeline doubtful.

@KrisWustrow

3 жыл бұрын

@@Matt-mt2vi My figures assume Russia continuing their shipments unchanged; and they wouldn't be able to increase exports in wartime as the pipelines are already maxed out.

@Matt-mt2vi

3 жыл бұрын

@@KrisWustrow my bag, I read as a need to disrupt the oil supply to choke off their supply of fuel. I am still not sure it would have a great effect, even max output prewar, the out put would then basically be all war drive only.. as it did with the US during WW2. all non essential fuel use would be basically cut off. Every thing not military related would be shut down or severely rationed. Plus with China operating in their own region they would not be a great increase consumption of fuel. One of many great failures of the German war effort was how far they operated outside of thier own country. ( Bigger area, bigger fuel use) Which greatly compounded when they failed to gain any of the oil feilds (Middle East or Soviets)

@shingyanling1856

3 жыл бұрын

holy shit thats true, when mao zhendong was in charge of china everyone starved and it was NK lol, am chinese, can confirm

Unfortunately you forgot the Chinese 3 carrier and 055 destroyer in the sea. They would already use nuclear weapons to damage Japan before U.S use it as an attacking base.

because i am going to conform my toughts, yes, any questions?

I think a lot of people are missing the point of the video. He’s not making a likely scenario. He’s saying IF war broke out, this would be potential things that happened based on force counts and numbers.

*Sees Title* *Grabs Popcorn, Headphones, and Kicks back*

@Raul_Menendez

3 жыл бұрын

Ah. The Switzerland strategy. Classic.

Did USA win anything in Vietnam or Korea?

@BK5250

Жыл бұрын

Korea was not a full out war and the US had minuscule numbers involved compared to other wars. The only goal was to keep southern Korea intact.

They imagine how to attack China's mainland in various scenarios, but short of imagining America's mainland can also be hit by missiles.

95% of China really includes only the eastern 1/3 of China.

I didnt know Beijing had oil

@carternelson1122

2 жыл бұрын

As an American, 🤣🤣🤣 this is great

@iacorianus

2 жыл бұрын

Oil, you say?

@jackmeoff2018

2 жыл бұрын

took me a second but hahahahahahaha

@reganmonzo4410

2 жыл бұрын

Oil 😂😂😂 China still runs on coal 😂

Your question is absurd. The US Army is a shell of what it was before Obama.

The fist question is, why do they have to fight huh? 👁️👄👁️ they are not neighbors, they are very far away? 👁️👄👁️

Considering the current situation in the Med sea, France vs Turkey would be a fun one to watch.

@giannisioannou1286

3 жыл бұрын

Ft. Greece

@theimperiumofman3714

3 жыл бұрын

If it happens it's likely France would have the support of most of Europe and America But it depends on who the aggressor is . If no nukes then France might be able to take some islands but Turkish mainland would be unharmed. If nukes are allowed then Turkey is a gonna get stomped .

@hopperthemarxist8533

3 жыл бұрын

Yes it would be fun to watch people kill eachother. Imbecile. War is a “fun one to watch” Huh

@giannisioannou1286

3 жыл бұрын

@@hopperthemarxist8533 as a guy that will fight in this war (if it happens) i would love to the the vid.

@theimperiumofman3714

3 жыл бұрын

@@hopperthemarxist8533 it is fun to watch hypothetical situations. Not actual war

The fact is that China has done so well in economic, technological, political and military terms, and their standard of living has grown so dramatically over the last 45 years that China is not likely to derail their amazing achievements by going into a war that neither side would really be able to declare a victory. So, China is not the threat that the western media likes to portray. Secondly, the Chinese government could easily and quickly increase the amount of military spending, and they are investing many billions into advanced weapons like hypersonic glide missiles, anti carrier missiles, laser weapons, very long range SAM and AAM, anti satellite missiles, anti radar missiles, advanced sensors, Stealth aircraft, etc etc, so they are serious about not being in a weak position ever again. They have the money, industrial capabilities, technological skills, etc that allows China to design, develop, build, deploy and operate large numbers of very advanced weapons and equipment, if they feel the need to do so. Thirdly, the whole of China's military is concentrated in China, they have a massive and very modern coastguard (bigger than most navies), a very strong armed police force, a large border guard, civilian police force and various other paramilitary forces, they would be a very tough enemy by anyone's standards.

@chevyjohnson7457

2 жыл бұрын

China is a threat you bot

@chrisnamaste3572

2 жыл бұрын

Never underestimate the illogical ambitions of a dictator for life like Xi.

@libruce196

2 жыл бұрын

brain washed victim

@ibungothangjam524

2 жыл бұрын

@@chrisnamaste3572 propaganda does not work here.

@work90

2 жыл бұрын

@@ibungothangjam524 given how shitty Russia performed in Ukraine when under dictatorship, it appears most likely China will go the same route. China barely have any allies. The US led operation in Iraq shows how sophisticated the US and it's allies are. Japan alone can take on chyna

And winning a war on either side, it's more about strategy

No. I know and have read much Chinese history. We would not “conquer” China. Force them to capitulate? Yes. Then it’s back to making money.

@jackylynn

4 ай бұрын

We dont have to be enemies the West and China can live harmoniously ✌️🕊️❤️

@luangu

4 ай бұрын

@@jackylynn Mmm.. not entirely. At their core ancient view is that they are the "CENTER" of the world and for the lack of a better term, it's axis. Thus the world would revolve around IT. That is also why you will NEVER, EVER get China to accept a free and independent taiwan.

@dukedase7

4 ай бұрын

Lmao wtf kind of braincel shit are you on about? The 'conflict' is because the US keeps opressing China. Taiwan is nothing more than a western puppet, barely better than occupied Korea.

@luangu

3 ай бұрын

@@jackylynn Nope. They believe in a "WE" and we believe in a "I". Fundamental incompatibility.

50% of the comments: *ChINa SuCkS UsA StRoNK!* Other 50% of the comments: *ChInA StRoNk!* Me: *Scrollin through, enjoying my joint and some popcorn* 😂 🇨🇦

@supernovel7514

2 жыл бұрын

The real war

@someguyv1188

2 жыл бұрын

It's funny, but I'm also losing braincells.

Ok, I’m Chinese but in the US and all I can say is, people are playing too much Call of Duty games 😂

@LayLowOfficial

3 жыл бұрын

Legit question: what is life like in China, under the CCP( your perspective,of course)?

@skullity3896

3 жыл бұрын

@@LayLowOfficial oh it’s good a normal life nobody really cares about u personal. And btw, I was born in the US and lived in China for 6 years and now back in the US

@LayLowOfficial

3 жыл бұрын

@@skullity3896 interesting...so which is a better place to live,in your view?

@skullity3896

3 жыл бұрын

@@LayLowOfficial China because it’s fun for vacation centers and in the US, I work for a living

@skullity3896

3 жыл бұрын

@@iconquer1672 😂

The only way this could happen is if Thanos or Q snap their fingers and got rid of all nuclear weapons instantly they all either disappeared in the flash of light or they turn to Ash

Nope , US can destroy its Navy , but an Invasion is difficult , China was too big and has very large population. Chinese city was big

I think a more realistic scenario would be a reignited Korean civil war becoming a hot war with China, with Korea, Japan and the USA fighting up through the Korean China border

@SkinnerBeeMan

3 жыл бұрын

Rok army is no joke. But the weakness is Japan and Korea will never play ball together.

@ZZeeNiCey

3 жыл бұрын

Naw no one wants anything to do with North Korea, too many hungry mouths to feed.

@SkinnerBeeMan

3 жыл бұрын

@@ZZeeNiCey word. Preach. South Korea don't want to deal with that

@ZZeeNiCey

3 жыл бұрын

@@SkinnerBeeMan exactly

Wrong question; Conquer? No. Defeat their military? Yes.

As an American, I can say that I admire the hard-working people of China. I have sat down and had lunch with some of my Chinese colleagues and I can say that we'd both rather sit down and eat a good meal together than to go to war with one another. They didn't forget our contributions to their freedom during WW2. They understand that I am not a fan of their leadership. Their response is the same for our leadership. Wealthy people, sending the poor to fight their wars. Not fair. I pray that peace always prevails. If it doesn't, The Chinese government will find out what a determined people we are.

@howardlee7588

Жыл бұрын

We have found that you are not in Korean war.😂

@howardlee7588

Жыл бұрын

I am not trying to be offensive, but in general, Single-ethnic countries tend to be more resolute in war, especially in East Asia. In world war two，As an agricultural country, under the leadership of a corrupt and inefficient national government, we have resisted the invasion of Japan for 12 years and suffered more than 20 million lives. To be honest, the knowledge I learned from the history of the war launched by the United States in the past three hundred years tells me that the United States cannot afford the same intensity of investment and loss.

@GentiluomoStraniero

Жыл бұрын

@@howardlee7588 As far as the Korean war is concerned, the PLA pushed the UN forces just south of the 38th parallel. This is where UN forces learned how to fight the PLA, made adjustments and pushed them back just north of the 38th, fighting a numerically superior enemy to a stalemate. The US helped do this with an extended supply chain over 5000 miles long. PLA combat deaths = 180,000, US combat deaths = 33,739. Yeah I believe that takes determination.

@zerosen1972

Жыл бұрын

It's almost like the next world war will be a class war instead....

They couldnt conquer afganistan how they going to do with china?

@zulkifliebinjaffar.zulkifl9337

Жыл бұрын

Dat is e accurate Answer for dis Stupid Question👍🤣

@bigboi5647

Жыл бұрын

CHINESE BOT DETECTED: ‘l STOP();

@mack9919

Жыл бұрын

Mr clueless, the USA ruled Afghanistan for almost 20 years! You peasants are lucky that the USA has morals and hasn't used our weapons of mass destruction since WW2. The world has never seen WOMD that powerful since WW2. imagine the type of WOMD we have today. There is a reason why the USA has a say in every area of the world. We keep the world in order.

Sometimes Binkov's analysis are so detailed it almost makes us think Binkov is from the KGB advising China and US to maintain peace and prosperity.

@dznuts123

2 жыл бұрын

Binkov is really advising the US to maintain peace, the country that is actively provoking the other party.

@ameykulkarni7491

2 жыл бұрын

@@dznuts123 I dunno man, the USA isn't the one who steals and encroaches on Indian and Bhutanese land, fights with basically every country in SE Asia and claims independent countries as being wholly it's, and support the People's Democratic Republic of Korea

I only know that when this war was over, everyone could play Fallout 5 in reality for free! Congrats! Hope my collection of bottle caps won't fail me then.

@Afrancis16

3 жыл бұрын

We have to wait until 2077

@jeopardized9293

3 жыл бұрын

@@Afrancis16 nah that's the game our kids are going to play

@codingcat1836

3 жыл бұрын

@@jeopardized9293 The game would at least be complete by our kid's time. Unfortunately we only get the buggy demo version.

@justsomeplantcells-

3 жыл бұрын

Nah sorry mate We don’t need a nuke, a missile to their big ass dam and it will flood half of the country

I like how everyone is military experts on these comments lol

Conquer china or destroy china ? Which is more suitable ?

@bharamabull-eb7yr

11 ай бұрын

Distroy 👍