Let's all be honest, Russian bias would find a way.

@benyboy539

7 жыл бұрын

OP tanks...

@TheMrFu

7 жыл бұрын

Gaijin would become their plane and tank manufacturers.

@benyboy539

7 жыл бұрын

Snafu LOL true

@ece5925

7 жыл бұрын

+Snafu ahahah

@TheEmolano

7 жыл бұрын

They will spread winter to the gobe so muricans shal freze in they home

i'm especially surprised how well the east coast of us and west russia fit into each other

@HogRidda

Жыл бұрын

Who asked

@slavaukraine5117

Жыл бұрын

@@HogRidda i did

@Justlibing010

Жыл бұрын

@@HogRiddaI did

@CM-ed8fw

Жыл бұрын

​@@HogRidda i did

The Russians have a secret weapon: shirtless Putin riding on a bear

@spongebobsquarepants4406

4 жыл бұрын

The Americans have a secret Weapon: George Washington riding on a flying balled eagle with McDonald's and coke, holding the American flag in the eagles feet while playing USA national anthem earrape and America Fuck yeah! music on max volume shooting every russian in the war in sight.

@antanassmetona1144

4 жыл бұрын

@@spongebobsquarepants4406 ♥

@spongebobsquarepants4406

4 жыл бұрын

@@antanassmetona1144 😂

@spongebobsquarepants4406

4 жыл бұрын

@@antanassmetona1144 I would ❤ your comment if I could 😂😂

@lazarjovanovic4388

4 жыл бұрын

@@spongebobsquarepants4406 amerigays

I'm American so i am biased toward my country but who am i kidding everyone in these comments are biased toward either their country or the country they favor the most. But for everyone in the comments arguing about what would happen in real life #1 this is a scenario where the US shares a border with Russia #2 in the rules of Binkov's Battlegrounds Morale, Nukes, and Alliances are not taken into account #3 He is going off equipment quality, army numbers, and likely tactics. In the real world wars could go either way because they are won on willingness to fight and ability to outfit and supply units and leadership is also a large factor so don't get caught up in your dumb bias and enjoy this video its not dictating what would actually happen

@stormbringer2189

6 жыл бұрын

If Russia and America shared a boarder, we would have a massive Russain speaking population, because Russains would be fleeing Russia for the states

@oskarthicc1012

6 жыл бұрын

Gian Bass Russia would eat USA up

@thegoldenshotgun_sk

6 жыл бұрын

USA also have better equipment and more professional soldiers with ability to deploy almost everywere in few hours.

@oskarthicc1012

6 жыл бұрын

TheGoldenShotgun SK uk can deploy the most soldiers at once. I’m Russian and I think we would defeat u guys

@thegoldenshotgun_sk

6 жыл бұрын

I am not American. I am just sayin that America is stronger. Also, I like both USA and Russia but I hate Putin and Trump (but seriously, Putin is fking dictator). Btw, in real life, war between USA and Russia would be nuclear apocalypse for everyone.

What I learned: Let's not fuck around with superpowers?

@awasp6344

8 жыл бұрын

but you are UNSC. you could fuck USA and russia up and win

@aerthisseven9768

7 жыл бұрын

"Who control the skies, control the world"

@awasp6344

7 жыл бұрын

+Aerthis Seven indeed.

@awasp6344

7 жыл бұрын

+Aerthis Seven unsc has spaceships, from light frigates to there largest ship, the UNSC infinity. (flagship)

@aerthisseven9768

7 жыл бұрын

+Evan Wilson the world si not Halo, ^^

Why are people ignoring the standard versus rules? no nukes no allies bloodlust military civilian morale ignored is it really so hard? Edit: Disclaimer. The comments bellow are unmoderated.

@ikesteroma

7 жыл бұрын

If nukes are factored into the equation, the answer is automatic: no winner, and that's no fun to speculate about. If allies and morale are factored, the equation suddenly gets much more complicated and would require a more extensive video.

@DeltaVK

7 жыл бұрын

+Weißer Wolf - There are a lot of wars the US could lose while on the offensive, but I do agree that almost any defensive war could be won by the US, though the same could be said for most countries with a large military.

@DeltaVK

7 жыл бұрын

***** I want to preface this by saying that these are wars the US would lose if it were the invader; India, boasting it's large manpower pool and relatively large air force, would definitely be able to defend from a US invasion. A large standing army of 1.3m (or something like that) could secure the whole coastline, and the large air force could secure the skies. France, given it's modern equipment and having the most recent, large scale, experience on the defense, would just entrench and stalemate the US for several years. They held the line in World War 1, they held the line in World War 2 (until, you know, the Germans walked around their line), and they would probably be able to hold the line against a US naval invasion. Germany too could probably hold off a US naval invasion given how spirited the Germans are in a war to fight until the end, as well as their early adoption of elastic and adaptive offensive and defense. Germany has a modern military and undoubtedly a modern mindset when it comes to strategy and tactics, though admitted they currently lack much armour and basically don't have a navy (no aircraft carriers). I was going to say the UK next, but I'm English and as a result I'm biased, but India, France and Germany all could definitely fend off a US naval invasion, by virtue of friendly soil, knowledge of the terrain, early warning systems already set in place, fast mobilisation, etc. Now, is the US powerful? Of course the US is powerful, and is definitely the most powerful nation on Earth currently. That being said, it doesn't mean that every single war that it fights in automatically means it will be a US victory. Many other militaries can outperform the US in many aspects (such a friendly fire and general discipline). Now, if these countries weren't on the other side of the world and perhaps bordered the US, yes. These would be landslide victories.

@ShantanuSuchil

7 жыл бұрын

The Germans were set to win the war against the Russians, then Winter came and fucked them up. With all the industry set in the middle or eastern part of the country, Russia could use it massive industry to wear the Germans down before pushing them back.

@Scriptedviolince

7 жыл бұрын

***** winter didn't exactly hurt the Soviet efforts though, and it hit the Germans quite hard. That said, is say the logistics rather than momentum was the deciding factor. Food, water, bullets, guns, and warm bodies, but all of it was at the end of a logistics tail that just want good or robust enough to reach that far.

Russia+USA=Fallout 3

@ryans1623

3 жыл бұрын

At least we wouldn't have any more libtards sjw complaining on social media anymore they would be the first one s dead.

@keterpatrol7527

2 жыл бұрын

Yes

@inquisitorkryptman7893

2 жыл бұрын

Fallout is Sino American war

Wow, this is some military grade sesame street! :D

Russia and US are like 31 km apart though.. the bering strait

@razormonkey5279

8 жыл бұрын

But Alaska and Siberia makes that 31km very difficult.

@Binkov

8 жыл бұрын

Bering strait crossing may be covered in a future video with real world map setting.

@edofluit7026

7 жыл бұрын

are you from russia?

@US395Official

7 жыл бұрын

oh fock

@cosmiccollision6374

7 жыл бұрын

Edo Fluit nah, i'm aussie mate.

russia got a very good weapon: the winter

@grantsherman6990

7 жыл бұрын

aservir frais but we have captain America sooo

@JustAsPlanned1

7 жыл бұрын

No it doesn't. 1940s winters were an anomaly.

@peterbarca8783

7 жыл бұрын

Actually it was more of the distance in between the russian border and its heartland. No matter how elite or advanced an army is, it will invariably get overstretched in this country and destroyed. Especially in a hostile country.

@nagasako7

7 жыл бұрын

Minnesota, Michigan, Dakotas and Alaska have just as harsh winters. There would be no shortage of US Army winter specialists.

@Bullet-Tooth-Tony-

7 жыл бұрын

The Mongols were not beaten by the winter

This video: Alaska: Am i a joke to you?

So I was about to go to the beach right? But when I got there, I didn’t see the ocean. I saw the kremlin!

No one can successfully invade Russia. The land mass and climate alone will make this super hard.

@0EEVV0

7 жыл бұрын

Blackrose 78 so no one can successfully invade Russia or will it be super hard? I'm confused...

@Skylabz604

7 жыл бұрын

***** Wont be able to keep all territories so it wont be a successful invasion. Just a prolonged war that will drain your resources and you will eventually quit.

@germanman95

7 жыл бұрын

Why, because neither Napoleon nor Hitler couldn't do it?

@Skylabz604

7 жыл бұрын

Rødgrød med fløde Are we talking about now or the past? It will be harder now obviously due to tech advancements.

@germanman95

7 жыл бұрын

Blackrose 78 Both sides have made technological advancements though. And this video shows that the U.S. has developed more.

the sad thing about this is that nuclear warfare would get involved

@lolmao500

7 жыл бұрын

They got bunkers. They don't care

@louiesouthgate8347

7 жыл бұрын

Thad Henry Nuclear weapons are banned at this point.

@veemie8148

7 жыл бұрын

if world war 3 was a total war and did happen it would last for only a few hours

@veemie8148

7 жыл бұрын

and there would be no winner

@ArieeirA

7 жыл бұрын

i just got a sick image of Kim Jong Un naked on a ICBM armed with a nuclear warhead yelling im on top of the world mothafucka in the most stereotypical japanese accent even if he's korean

you completely left out USA anti-tank attack drones, they are literally built to wipe out hostile tank fleets with zero lose of life on the USA's side.

@gioflores

5 жыл бұрын

Well this was made 2 yrs ago. I assume they weren't made then

@steveTGO

5 жыл бұрын

Well, yes drones were in use long before the making of this video, but they would in all probability, only account for maybe like 20% of the pounding that Russia would be getting from the air. The U.S. has 10x the planes along with 10x the capacity and capital to manufacturer more. Russia has significantly more tanks than the U.S., but once the United States eliminates the Russian Airforce assets, ane dominates the air Russian Tanks would be systematically decimated. They Country that controls the Air, controls it all!!!!

@steveTGO

5 жыл бұрын

@sub to neutronex - Yes, but as is the same with Aircraft assets, the U.S. has 30 to 1 on Russia. The economics of war would be heavily in the favor of the U.S., Russia cannot compete with the financial resources and/or manufacturing capabilities of the U.S..

@mobilecyclop7329

4 жыл бұрын

You left our our against tank smart artilleries

@steveTGO

4 жыл бұрын

@zoki kostadinov - You sound goofy with that response. The financial ratings are figured by the Global banking system, Russia is only the 6th economy of the world, which, factors purchase power and price differences between the nations. The U.S. economy is 20x larger, rated the #1 economy of the world, the Russian economy isn't even close. In addition, Russia has half the population which means they have half the labor force to contribute to the overall economy and Manufacturing

Russian's hear that winter is coming and think they're about to be saved. American's hear that winter is coming and think theyll watch Game of Thrones in their All-Terrain heated APC while they continue the offensive. Shrugging off actual winter because of satallite weather means we actually get predictable weather these days so we won't get destroyed like armies of the past.

@RedShocktrooperRST

5 жыл бұрын

The bigger question becomes supply lines. The longer the war drags on, the further the trek from the factory and farm to the frontline, and Russia historically has relied upon its sheer size as its main defense. As temperatures drop and weather turns, the Russians probably would have destroyed much of what could've assisted the US (ranging from farms to bridges) forcing them to burn time and resources keeping their momentum going. Furthermore, "General Winter" has killed as many Russians as he has invaders, so nature really isn't on anyone's side beyond who is willing to lose more. Furthermore, if you're sitting in a heated vehicle or FOB waiting for winter to blow over, you aren't attacking, which means all the food and fuel you're expending waiting is essentially wasted unless Russia tries to mount a counter-offensive (which given how Russia would be suffering just as much as the US, is unlikely). Simply put, it would come down to if the US could actually keep its troops at the frontlines stocked up with food, fuel and ammunition, and if they couldn't, if Russia could muster the manpower and material to push them back.

@latinman1736

5 жыл бұрын

RedShocktrooper the US cojld simply use its larger industry to produce huge amounts of transport trucks and aircraft. Then they could man those with conscripts, so you would have less unwilling people on the front line. People should accept that winter is no threat to a modern army that has prepared its troops well. Remember americans no what extreme weather is like too, think about alaska which is actually further north then most of russias major cities like volgograd, rostov na donu, samara, mosow, irkutsk, etcetera. Also the US has mobile bridges, large helicopter transport fleets, and amphibeous armoured personnel carriers. And unlike most of history russia would be out numbered by the larger population of america.

@theunconventionaldeal3879

5 жыл бұрын

Winter isnt a savior against the U.S. its not the 1940's. Even extreme cold wouldn't be much of an issue. America has divisions of winter soldiers, in example 10th mountain.

@BilalMarcus

5 жыл бұрын

Americans arent afraid of the cold. half of the country is cold. im from indiana myself. snow blizzards and school cancellations.

@epicraptor7791

5 жыл бұрын

@@BilalMarcus Americans have always kept an offensive going in the cold. The brits learned thay when George Washington's army crossed the FUCKING DELAWARE RIVER DURING WINTER like an absolute Madlad

what if donald trump builds a huge wall ?

@stanal-adam4914

7 жыл бұрын

Make a great pacific wall and make Cthulhu pay for it.

@anarchyandempires5452

7 жыл бұрын

Cthulhu is on the Atlantic.

@stanal-adam4914

7 жыл бұрын

Make him pay double.

@denizyuksel5093

7 жыл бұрын

+CheatyTycoon 2 Then make him pay quadruple.

@helpimstuck9410

7 жыл бұрын

TurkishSoldierReloadingHisGunForNextPkkWave long live Kurdistan

Surely Hitler and napoleon watch this video before invade Russia as both had ground forces superiority...

@EllaViewD

7 жыл бұрын

Surely hitler and napoleon moved Russian next to France or German in an arena

@thehutch4823

7 жыл бұрын

Manuel Flores Escobar Russia had much more troops than both Hitler's and Napoleon's

@manuelfloresescobar7657

7 жыл бұрын

Jonathan Hutchison really?..German army was much powerful and tech advance that soviet army!

@thehutch4823

7 жыл бұрын

Manuel Flores Escobar The Germans had some of the worst reliability for their tanks while the Russians had the best

@manuelfloresescobar7657

7 жыл бұрын

at the beginning of the Barbarroja operation or the invasion of Soviet Union...German tanks Tiger was better that Russian tanks...only when T-34 was due to fight..soviet army could fight equal vs German panzer division!....nowdays Russian military tech is better than western tech in all fields..S-400/500 mobile system better than patriot, Iskander,KA-50,Armata,TOS-1, Pantsir etc...USA spend budget in salarys and bases...USA has many aircarriers but are an easy target for long range antiship accurate missile which 30 years ago it did not exist such system!

This is the second video I've seen, the previous was the Kirov video. Continue the good work, your videos are well done and entertaining.

Russia has 682 fighter aircraft United States has 2919 Just saying

@pawn5253

5 жыл бұрын

Russia and most of world have given up trying to out number the US air fleet, thats why Russia has MUCH better air defenses, to deny air superiority.

@canyoushutup12

5 жыл бұрын

So scary...

@stansearcheslife6363

4 жыл бұрын

Russia has 70milion troops

@gabenewell3955

4 жыл бұрын

Austin Moi Germany only had 60 million people in ww2 yet almost defeated the 200 million strong USSR

@gabenewell3955

4 жыл бұрын

Us doesn’t have russia has 2400 not 682

I believe it would turn into nuclear if either side saw an impending loss after exhausting all other means.

@pubcle

7 жыл бұрын

In the modern world, Russia knows it can not survive a US assault, even alongside China, the US simply has too much technology, manpower, and such a hard pumping war machine with hundreds of military bases surrounding Russia and hundreds of allies, the US is the current world superpower, like the British Empire before it most countries will do a lot to try and keep or gain the favor of the United States. Russia uses nuclear weapons as a shield, an insurance, it can not stand a war with the US so it will engage in nuclear standoff because as horrible as it is Russia would have a better chance of surviving it.

@nicholasknightley1201

7 жыл бұрын

Europe would never risk such a scenario... while Americans are more or less safe on another continent, EU would be under direct threat and do everything to avoid war. Nobody wants horrendous casualties and countless years to spend living in nuclear shelters ;) This is why yanks keep pushing Europe into that direction and EU keeps trying to avoid it.

@pubcle

7 жыл бұрын

Nicholas Knightley Hillary was pushing very swiftly towards nuclear standoff, which is probably one of the two reasons I supported Trump vastly over her (the other being open borders which could ensure we never get anyone but Liberal ever again as immigrants from 3rd world tend to vote very very left and many are even anti-democracy in the middle east). Hillary was going to attack Russia's ally, this would force a standoff between Russia and the US and allies which include nearly all of Europe. The US public wasn't pushing Europe in that direction, they want peace just as much as the UK and France and Spain and all of the others, Hillary was but now that she's out of the picture Trump promises cooperation with Russia to defuse tensions, joint strikes against ISIS and joining armies to defeat a common foe, a much better solution with the potential to begin friendly relations between countries.

@arthurdduda8233

7 жыл бұрын

psst... hey buddy, you have it backwards, because the USA is there, you haven't had to worry about attack from Russia, and do you remember that little thing called the Berlin wall that kept Germans prisoner of the Soviet union ? Europe has enjoyed peace and prosperity from the USA and the NATO agreements, you have not had to fight each other like you've been known thru history to do, and you haven't had to face the Soviet union and you now have a more reasonable Russia instead of a menacing bear, you can thank the US military and the US tax payers anytime, that is once you stop blaming us for everything and running your mouths putting the USA and Americans down because it's the shiek thing to do in Europe these days.

@nicholasknightley1201

7 жыл бұрын

Arthur Duda I hope this is just a bad joke because if it's not, your knowledge of history and politics is absolutely lacking! Berlin wall was built under a mutual agreement between US/UK/FR and the Soviets. Berlin was to be split under several control zones, after what Germans did (WWI and WWII) they were quite lucky to have such a solution instead of losing their country and having it divided between all neighbours surrounding it. Hitler bombed London for weeks killing civilians knowing it had no military targets. Thank the US military for what? Starting pointless wars all over the globe and dragging Europe into them? Russia/ Soviet Union was going to do what? Attack Europe? Mate drop your cold war propaganda, it's poor and outdated. Russia will never attack anyone because it has all it needs, you attack others if you need natural resources and territory and that's what Ruskis will never lack. So far as I can remember, it was Europe that kept attacking Russia throughout entire history.Why? Resources! Same is happening with Arabs now. We need their oil, preferably free or water-cheap. Waging wars is just too profitable for the US government and lobbyists to stop it, mainly because it's heavily oriented towards weapon industry and arms trade. If there were no more wars and evil Russians we have to defend from by spending billions on NATO and obsolete weaponry, American weapon industry would suffer immense loses.

Let's hold the ice cream instead of the guns.

@vicsrealms

7 жыл бұрын

Blue Bell would bring world peace! ~grin~

@TheJon9001

7 жыл бұрын

i could just knock the ice cream off your hand. That didn't solve anything.

@leeroybrown150

7 жыл бұрын

pig Schwein why not both?

I think this video is overdue for a remake lol

where u get your info at?

@theodorbutters141

5 жыл бұрын

Wikipedia (Equipment of Armed Forces Of *Insert country*)

I believe we are stronger as allies than enemies

@nikolasgorelkin3076

5 жыл бұрын

We are ENEMIES?

@looinrims

3 жыл бұрын

@@nikolasgorelkin3076 yes

@gourmetbanana

2 жыл бұрын

Frenemies?

@AwestynJaxxxson

2 жыл бұрын

R/im14andthisisdeep

@PlazaGaming

2 жыл бұрын

That aged well

brazil vs all south america

@gordonproductions284

7 жыл бұрын

:v

@ericdeluhery8607

7 жыл бұрын

They arent Paraguay, I doubt they would do that because they cant even control their cities.

@parsont.689

7 жыл бұрын

+Eric Deluhery "they cant even control their cities." Ferguson, Charlotte, Milwaukee, Baltimore.... By your logic, the US shouldn't get into a war too?

@ericdeluhery8607

7 жыл бұрын

Parson T. I would prefer if they didn't, but Brazil is under a whole different thing, their slums are directly under control of their version of mobs. They need to bring in the army to do anything. And that only let's them clear it out not solve it.

@ericdeluhery8607

7 жыл бұрын

Parson T. it would be like if LA was every major city and the police were corrupt.

Next video Luxembourg vs Russia please

@Baibakov88

Жыл бұрын

It would be a much more even fight.

RUSSIA - 600 tanks?! WTF

@eatinsomtin9984

4 жыл бұрын

ikr its supposed to be 15k

So annoying that they wouldn't fight each other via the Pacific, instead they use Europe as their battlefield.

@MrEJVZ

7 жыл бұрын

Then the USA would have to march all the way through Siberia or fight naval battles throughout the Arctic Ocean to get the the populated and developed part. Nobody wants to do that.

@RKNGL

7 жыл бұрын

An invasion through Siberia wouldn't be very fruitful and it would be unnecessarily long. Though the Coast maybe occupied it would be extremely doubtful to see a attack much further than the Russian Coast. In a realistic scenario the lacking part on the Russian navy would be catastrophic in the Baltic Sea and lead to a mass amphibious invasion that would quickly take St. Petersburg. Though many U.S. troops pushing from within the N.A.T.O. territory would be the primary front.

@DisturbedAidan2

7 жыл бұрын

Yeah but think of all the territory and resources that the US could capture. US could send a smaller force to do this, which would force Russia to defend both sides, whilst US ties up most of the forces in the west.

@RKNGL

7 жыл бұрын

***** The problem with no "neutral" lands is that it forces the U.S. the nation that would start on the offense to invade through small choke points that would never be used in a conventional main invasion. It's this exact reason why they would have to invade through neutral territory. Invasion through Siberia isn't viable at all. Attacking in the Arctic could only work as a secondary invasion the main invasion would have to come through the Baltic and since or Black Sea. The distance away from the U.S. would logistically make an ground invasion nonviable without the inclusion of neutral territory or at least as have supply lines. Fronts would be to small allowing the Russians to guard the coast without fear of being attacked overland. Without this threat no real invasion would likely occur.

@RKNGL

7 жыл бұрын

Akuratist Ov It wasn't possible for the third Reich to amphibiously invade Leningrad, nor was it possible for a mass continuous naval barrage. Furthermore the Soviet navy bombarding the German attackers near Leningrad was pivotal in the city's defense. Modern weaponry even further leans this to the side of a naval victory. A navy with such overwhelming strength like the U.S.'s shouldn't be discounted as it would be horrify to face. Though the amount of time from war declared an the invasion would judge how defensible the cities fortifications would be.

Music is too loud

@PePe-ii1gy

7 жыл бұрын

MrFilipas! What music is it?!

@pandjitandyolegowo3588

7 жыл бұрын

+Pe Pe Darude - Sandstorm

@PePe-ii1gy

7 жыл бұрын

otaku weizahrd Jokes on you, I found it you fucking subhuman.

Russia: "we can take the US down in 30 minutes or less" me watching this video: boiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii

@JasonVoorhees-nj8jj

4 жыл бұрын

The Yangem the Russians: USA should be an easy win Tojo: Lol Mussolini: bruh King George: no comment Robert E Lee: ..... Hitler: Nein.....

@GodlysRebirth

4 жыл бұрын

Usa will destroy Russia in a sec

@nail3069

4 жыл бұрын

@@GodlysRebirth Winter:l am joke for you?

@comradejosephstalin8136

4 жыл бұрын

@@GodlysRebirth wanna hear a joke ? Usa

@dimitri7857

4 жыл бұрын

Yup we could do the same to Russia with Ohio-class submarines.

07:12 "War would be of a scale that the US hasn't seen since World War 2..." Those words gave me serious goosebumps...:o

@ushopelife7538

3 жыл бұрын

Allies NATO United Nation Western Power & Axis CSTO BRICS Eastern Power Defectors Invasion of Russia Battle of Russia Battle of Moscow Operation Downfall:0:27,0:30,0:35,0:37,0:44,0:49,0:53,0:56,1:05,1:16,1:20,1:25,1:34,1:36,1:38,1:40,1:44,1:49,1:53,1:55,1:59,2:01,2:05,2:07,2:12,2:15,2:16,2:19,2:23,2:29,2:38,2:46,2:54,3:01,3:03,3:04,3:07,3:11,3:15,3:20,3:24,3:27,3:31,3:37,3:41,3:51,3:59,4:04,4:08,4:15,4:20,4:25,4:35,4:41,4:50,4:54,5:01,5:08,5:10,5:16,5:27,5:30,5:34,5:42,5:44,5:49,5:52,5:57,6:04,6:16,6:20,6:26,6:32,6:39,6:43,6:47,6:51,6:58,7:05,7:10,7:16,7:21,7:25,7:28.7:33,7:35,7:40,7:44,(7:48)

I wish people would listion in the vid because it said NO NUKES/SUPPORT

@dilan234

7 жыл бұрын

s0m3 h4x0r ikr

@JonSmith-yq1dw

6 жыл бұрын

s0m3 h4x0r I know it's very annoying, Plus people thinking a certain country would win that didn't win strictly based on emotion which I guarantee you a lot of them saying Oh roshel wouldn't lose probably don't even live in Russia they just live somewhere else and hate the US for whatever reason.

@xerxesix1451

6 жыл бұрын

That mean the USA has to it alone and Russia can't use Nuclear Bombs

Do EU vs Russia

@caityreads8070

7 жыл бұрын

Defensively it might, but invasive I can't see it doing much better than the US.

@romulusnuma116

7 жыл бұрын

+CheatyTycoon 2 it would be fun to see tho

@spooly5466

7 жыл бұрын

we allready know who is gonna win that

@atlantis803

7 жыл бұрын

EU is not a military alliance and has no armed forces

@caityreads8070

7 жыл бұрын

Slavi SFZ Most of the countries in Europe with decent armies are in NATO, however.

USA vs China Arena War

@anduinwang7291

5 жыл бұрын

USA costly win. but definitely., I am Chinese.

@gabenewell3955

4 жыл бұрын

Anduin Narcissus China wins population too high

@spongebobsquarepants4406

4 жыл бұрын

@@gabenewell3955 but Americans are incredibly advanced in technology and the Chinese air force planes are so noisy, you can hear them from a mile away.

@spongebobsquarepants4406

4 жыл бұрын

@Slovak Countryball agreed

@dimitri7857

4 жыл бұрын

USA ez win, we have BRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRT

On one hand, Russia's greatest weapon, Boris, is now in walking distance to the US. On the other, Florida man is *right* on the border with Russia.

@reptilianoverlord9151

5 жыл бұрын

You have a good point there, nobody messes with Florida man.

Yes I do agree but a LOT I mean A LOT of Americans have guns...

@daaaaaaaaaaavid

7 жыл бұрын

Not fair but easier to explain than havin the USA and Russia on there normal spots in the world. You would have to take into account allies when a real war would take place and that is insanly time expensive.

@yogsothoth7594

7 жыл бұрын

Civilian militia are useful but they don't compare to actual military forces.

@srdragan317

7 жыл бұрын

not in my contry we have 2 year of training and we are used for operation against terroriste not like franch and other who have only 2 day

@yogsothoth7594

7 жыл бұрын

iyabi burn A well trained militia has its uses but they lack the versatility of an actual military. Generally they don't have many machine gun teams, armour, antitank equipment or artillery which limits the kinds of tactics they can use. In an extended war they can also be a logistical nightmare, especially seeing as many have a habit of putting huge amounts of lead down range.

@srdragan317

7 жыл бұрын

it's normal u think that but think about USA now they have man in asia half of the man they say in video they can't get back in contry or the pakistan irak and other will seek revange against USA and russia is not offancive contry but def contry they don't need alot of machin gun they have skhoi and T90 + S400 the USA can't make move whitout geting hit

Honestly the most thorough and detailed war scenario between the United States and Russia yet, nice job man.

These are far more entertaining than the educational value would suggest. Well done!

Never even realized how close to being complimentary the US east coast and Russian western border are.

@theperezident1934

4 жыл бұрын

Thomas Riley they’re not he cut out pieces of both countries so they could fit

@alexandriariley5209

4 жыл бұрын

@@theperezident1934 i said *close* to. The US border is mostly unaltered

@fakecubed

3 жыл бұрын

Geographically both countries have a lot in common. Culturally too, in the broad strokes. The US and Russia should find a way to be allies.

@danielvelasco4003

3 жыл бұрын

Russia and the US, even when friendly, have been rivals. It's like Goku and Vegeta, they'll always compete

@alexandriariley5209

3 жыл бұрын

@@danielvelasco4003 what about in 1867?

doesn't allow for what would happen if Russia started shooting down satellites which American modern jets rely heavily on, where the older Soviet planes wouldn't have the reliability on them

@HisCarlnessI

7 жыл бұрын

And how many of these magic Satellite destroying weapons does Russia have?

@reillybrangan2182

7 жыл бұрын

Russia also relies on U.S satellites as they are no longer really U.S exclusive satellites instead they are made available to the whole world, the small fleet of Russian GPS satellites is no comparison to the number already in orbit that are still owned by the U.S (which can be given commands to restrict access to certain areas and equipment)

@goranmihajlovic6179

7 жыл бұрын

GLONASS has full global coverage with a maintained 24 satellite constellation plus two spares. Your info is several years out of date. Quite a few phones even have dual GPS/GLONASS compatibility. The Russian military uses GLONASS.

@richieh7901

7 жыл бұрын

Negative Energy lol America is the only country on earth to shoot down a satellite with a fighter jet and that was just to show they could do it and your forgetting about Americas Boeing x37 satellite killer plane and thadd kinetic kill capabilities against satellites don't kid your self

@zipz8423

7 жыл бұрын

We train for this scenario too.

when is turkey vs russia land war

@Binkov

8 жыл бұрын

Hard to say precisely. It should be finished within a month or two. A different video will be ready in the meantime.

@orjelmort2330

8 жыл бұрын

+Binkov's Battlegrounds Nice video:) Can u made china Vs usa?

@askertr3812

8 жыл бұрын

hey Turkey gets out of NATO if NATO with Russia, Turkey, and America wouldn't stand a chance if he gets dispersed in ends

@askertr3812

8 жыл бұрын

gerızekalı ruzya nıye Türkiyeye saldırsın

@loma_pl1931

8 жыл бұрын

+Binkov's Battlegrounds Russia has 850 000 active soldiers and the US 1,4 millions but the russian reserve army is bigger

As usual, all the comments below are either triggered or pointless. The above scenario wasn't meant to be taken seriously. The reality is, of course, if any of those 2 countries looked as if they were going to lose 'a war' they would launch their nukes - end of 'the war' and human civilisation!

Thanks Binkov for another informative video.

Russia is much larger than the U.S. This map shows them equal size. Also it shows that after Moscow is taken the victor is announced. Russia doesn't need their capital. They will keep falling back and moving production back to the east just like they did in WW2.

@AlphaWolfShade

7 жыл бұрын

Really? What country was able to turn the war around when their capital was overrun?

@user-bm7rx7fk4k

7 жыл бұрын

WW ll, Russia, Moscow.

@AlphaWolfShade

7 жыл бұрын

Вовка Попкин *_With the aid of allies pressuring the Western front_* . Way to act like Russia did it all alone.

@skyair3444

7 жыл бұрын

Quantity does not equal quality

@AlphaWolfShade

7 жыл бұрын

Sky air Hey! You're not stupid! Have a cookie!

U didn't count hand of Stalin which will make every shot by Russian forces hit a target. With that it would be a decisive Russian victory

@0EEVV0

7 жыл бұрын

WaterlemonsRFun Gallian lol what a Russian perk :D *shoots a tree many times* *rip murica*

@wd-type9643

7 жыл бұрын

Tsk tsk. I sense this one needs education.

@schnitzel2121

7 жыл бұрын

30 millions? are you sick? where you took your data from? in stalins ussr there were less prisoners than now in usa. lesser than one million got death sentence. and can you believe, people in ussr commited crimes, and were sent to gulags for them, not just grabbed innocents because of nothing to do. dumb, unlogical propaganda, with no proves.

@schnitzel2121

7 жыл бұрын

X Ronixx X just check population counts of that time. there are no 30, 90 or 200 millions disappeared. ah yes, somebody said so. nice argument.

@schnitzel2121

7 жыл бұрын

Dex4Sure You shouldn't believe communist propaganda.- should i believe capitalist propaganda? i really dont like to believe, when i can know. and i know, that nobody in ussr killed millions of innocent people. thats just sick fantasies of rusophobic idiots. somebody fucking said... thats all proves for the shit. same style as boeing over ukraine which was shot for usa interests to give reason for sanctions. no investigation result still, but few hours after tragedy all western newspapers wrote it was putin guilty. propaganda is not bad by itself, and everyone uses it. but capitalist western propaganda is really rotten shit - stupid, unlogical, cynical and evil as hell.

Binkov where do you get all these numbers and types of tanks and airplanes ???

cant hear the narration of General Frog over the too-loud dramtic score

What about Europe vs USA?

@haleffect9011

7 жыл бұрын

***** That would be fun though!

@haleffect9011

7 жыл бұрын

***** It wouldn't if you included Geography! Imagine a USA offenssive; they would have complete naval superiority, cutting off Ireland first before Europe could react. Then as Europe musters it's forces, the USA besieges Britain and attacks the harbors. They use Marines to capture the strait of Gibraltar, but the Spanish paramilitary slow them down enough to get the army in position. Then as they Try and attack portugal and spain, France supplies the UK through the Tunnel, the USA starts to attack scotland, but they are bottlenecked by the British forces. The SAS becomes increasingly important as the British have some superiority, but are rapidly moving to intercept. The Iberian peninsula is then captured at great cost, But France and Itally uses their navies to bottleneck Gibraltar. France bottlenecks the USA in the Pyrenees. as they use their ressources; the USA attacks the north of Europe, and cuts off Sweden and Norwway from Europe, but they get stuck on the steep inclines of the Fjords. But the Commandos manage to penatrate the cities. Reinforcements then come from Central and Eastern Europe with Germany leading the Charge. with the extra reinforcements they manage to counter many of the advances. though the UK is captured. Amphibian landings in France are countered by the mass of troops reinforcing from the East and a stalemate is reached. Result: Partial US Victory. or another option is to have Europe attack the USA. with landing zones in Florida, and New Jersey. and have a fight there. Could be really fun!

@haleffect9011

7 жыл бұрын

***** Yes... to some extent, but Remember that the USA has far more defense funding then all of Europe combined. So that's where things get interesting. Can All of Europe (the largest economy of the world) manage to hold back the most powerful military power in the World. Also interesting would be USA vs China; The military peak of the world vs the production center of the world. Honestly I think it would as if not more interesting than US vs Russia. Because USA vs Europe is something that is difficult for people to guess; especially if you ignore all the internal politics of Europe, it is difficult for someone who doesn't know much about military capacity to estimate how powerful Europe is.

@haleffect9011

7 жыл бұрын

***** So are you thinking about it? :D

@haleffect9011

7 жыл бұрын

***** Awesome!

Do this same scenario, but set in the 1980s with the USSR vs USA

@leadleghighkick104

5 жыл бұрын

I’d actually give that one to the USSR

@h.n.t.d7963

5 жыл бұрын

I gave my money to ussr for that one just prepare for gulag

@steveTGO

5 жыл бұрын

USSR???? You mean the USSR that went belly up bankrupt before even getting close to U.S. technological advances? You mean the USSR that spent 10 years getting smacked around in Afghanistan? Come on man, silly silly silly..... USSR, Russia or whatever name or lose group of geography you refer to would have no chance to win against the U.S.. I'm not insulting the Russians, I actually respect their tenacity, but they just don't and never have had the right resources available to them to win a war against the U.S.!!!

@fahoodie1852

5 жыл бұрын

steve Pepke USA spent 20 years getting smacked around in Vietnam. At least the ussr was successful in influencing socialism in Afghanistan, unlike your capitalist Vietnam that fell to the Vietcong. USSR also had 20,000 + nukes and was extremely advanced in military for its time, and had a massive army.

@h.n.t.d7963

5 жыл бұрын

@@fahoodie1852 but pretty bad economi lol

Could you do another one, an updated version of Russia vs USA? Since years have passed and we have now seen armies equipped with new technologies, and seen both these countries in combat, it would be very interesting. After all, this is still the most interesting couple of potential enemies)

@looinrims

3 жыл бұрын

These armies aren’t made of new tech though, they’re just sprinkled in, the T-14 for example I believe numbers 50 operational vehicles, not very decisive in a war of thousands of vehicles

@looinrims

2 жыл бұрын

Although he did make one, not arena war but it exists, “Can US invade Russia if it wanted to?”

"After a year, a fair part of European Russia may fall to US" lol, try 1 week.

I disagree wholeheartedly a theoretical war between Russia and the US would be over the North Pole and over Canada.

@williamtattersall3528

7 жыл бұрын

Andy Smith yes. Russia would declare war on the us and not Canada to get to Canada. Yes.

@chaosmatty98

7 жыл бұрын

Do notice the "Arena War" in the title, This is a theoretical scenario in which both countries are combined into one landmass.

@hugh4581

7 жыл бұрын

The north pole is the greatest asset to any county. SO yes the future wars will be over the north pole

@ChaoticHeretic

7 жыл бұрын

Butthurt

@AquaNomad34

7 жыл бұрын

@Matthew Winfield, and that's exactly what ruins the video for me. The concept of theoretical war scenarios is to determine which side would theoretically win in the reality. But because you can not change the geographical aspect, so you are basically taking this scenario to a parallel universe. In other words, this entire video is completely useless because it doesn't show which side wins in our real world.

Why can't just Russia & the US be allies?

@syrupsippa962

8 жыл бұрын

That's one the best 💡 trump has and putin is open

@tommypham7572

7 жыл бұрын

Capitalism and communism

@branerodic3261

7 жыл бұрын

dont know

7 жыл бұрын

because that would mean a much more peaceful planet

@yogsothoth7594

7 жыл бұрын

Russia hasn't been Communist for years. They're capitalists and nationalists

What’s the music that plays in the background?

@mooheadummm9414

4 жыл бұрын

I'm late, but... It's at the end of the video!

Where'd you get this music? It sounds awesome!

@mooheadummm9414

4 жыл бұрын

Pretty late, but... It's at the end of the video! Exciting Trailer by Kevin MacLeod

U.S.A & European Union vs Brazil, Russia, India, China, & South Africa (BRICS)

@ignemuton5500

7 жыл бұрын

brazil russia india and south africa would rekt them.

@jenniferkeates

7 жыл бұрын

really? BRICS is still a thing? South Africa is bankrupt, Brazil is completely fucked, Russia is in recession and China's growith has slowed immensely. The only country doing well is India but their military isn't much to speak about.

@ignemuton5500

7 жыл бұрын

what about man power? remember this is an all out war.

@NIGHTMARE4021

7 жыл бұрын

You don't do research, sad.

@jenniferkeates

7 жыл бұрын

and how many indians/chinese have ever fired a gun in their lives, vs. americans?

Did you know the F22 is superior to the F35? It's just so exspensive the military couldn't field as many as it wanted, the F35 is a cheaper knock off to for smaller roles, the F22 is for air superiority, control of the skies & if the older russian aircraft can go toe to toe with the F22? The F35 doesn't stand a chance buddy!

@johnalexander651

7 жыл бұрын

I don't think you get the point of F-35. It's entire point is that it'll never go toe to toe with anybody it could take out any target from 22 km away without ever needing to engage.

@RadeUeMasq

7 жыл бұрын

The F35 is inferior to the Russian Su30 & Su35 which are both air superiority aircraft as well as multirole aircraft. The difference is the Su35 is a 2 man aircraft for longer missions so one pilot can rest while the other takes over. The F35 is mainly a multi role aircraft but it's air combat is severly lacking against these 2 Russian aircraft, even with long range ordnance the F35 won't be able to take on the Su30 & 35 for they have greater maneuverability then the F35 & can dodge it's longer range missles easily, meaning the Su30 & 35 can close in & knock them out of the sky period, the F22 could have served as a multi role fighter but was too exspensive because of it's unnecessary stealth coating

@RadeUeMasq

7 жыл бұрын

Already knew that lol I'm former U.S. Army, the A10 is a better aircraft then the F35, 35 is such a piece of shit, it was supposed to be in full production 2009-2010 but it's still under development because it still has problems... Also the F35 lost a mock dogfight against F16, many pilots are disappointed with the 35, the F22 is in talks for reproduction cause it fared better as a multi role aircraft then the 35 it's just more exspensive , F35 is shit & I have air force buddies saying that

@RadeUeMasq

7 жыл бұрын

F35 project started 2001 & is still in development in 2016, also the Pentagon has sunk some $350 billion into the project with still satisfactory results, the bloody plane is too heavy with all it's fancy gear & electronics & can only hold 6 missles in it's bay, they can store more missles on the wings but then the stealth feature is useless, also it's engine isn't powerfull enough to get maximum performance. The F35 has been a waist of tax payers money & the air force is ready to scrap the project but is being over riden by the Pentagon!

@RadeUeMasq

7 жыл бұрын

F35 project started 2001 & is still in development in 2016, also the Pentagon has sunk some $350 billion into the project with still satisfactory results, the bloody plane is too heavy with all it's fancy gear & electronics & can only hold 6 missles in it's bay, they can store more missles on the wings but then the stealth feature is useless, also it's engine isn't powerfull enough to get maximum performance. The F35 has been a waist of tax payers money & the air force is ready to scrap the project but is being over riden by the Pentagon!

Wow the US and Russia having a border sort of fits in! And US with Alaska attaches looks wack

@Dukezipper

3 жыл бұрын

YOUR TIME TO OWN AN ALASKA IS EXPIRED! RETURN ALASKA OR ASK JOE BIDEN!

Oh shit, what is this music? Someone please tell

#1 complaint, your music doesn't change. Otherwise fair, balanced, and comprehensive. You should do a red storm rising 'non-nuclear war in 1985' scenario a shot. There have been a dozen other books and opinions on the concept of a WWIII but I like your style.

@Binkov

8 жыл бұрын

True about music. So far it's proven too time consuming to search for new, free to use on youtube, music for every video. Sometime in the future that may change. As for Cold war scenario - you can bet that's high on the wish list! I'd love to do such a scenario but it'd also be a VERY complex scenario that requires TONS of research. Some day we will see it, I just don't know when exactly.

@hakonnygard4779

8 жыл бұрын

It is no other way to say it :-.) sorry; you are a schmuck :-)

@alexm2802

7 жыл бұрын

and u are a twat

@findusfilluren

7 жыл бұрын

awseome channel man! found it today and i love it! but the musik was to loud! keep up the good work!

@TypicalFrogman

7 жыл бұрын

Do South korea vs. North korea.

I'd love to see a Germany vs. Russia video, with at least 2 allies of each country helping them!

@chongli8409

7 жыл бұрын

Yeah Germany allies would be USA and GB and Russia will bring like... Cuba and North Korea maybe? Armenia? Umm, Kazakhstan? Give me a brake.

@raaaaaaaaaam496

7 жыл бұрын

speedfreak1488 china...

@chongli8409

7 жыл бұрын

GamingRanger China is not an ally to Russia, a friendly partner maybe, but there's not any treaty between two countries that makes them allies. Plus the only thing China gives a fuck about is China itself and it would rather watch Russia and US devastate each other than take a huge risk and openly confront USA.

@onyxdragon1179

7 жыл бұрын

Well, let's just imagine a scenario where China decides to help Russia

@Amine-nx4sb

7 жыл бұрын

Didn't China recently form a military alliance with Russia? (2 months ago)

We have an old joke in russia: "where c400 triumph standing - american planes not flying". C400 has enough missiles to destroy every plane in the world

The Russians have got around 15.500 tanks 11.000 of these are from cold war that means that Russia has got only 4.500 modern tanks.

@spritezeroxxx66

6 жыл бұрын

A lot of the cold war tanks have been heavily modernized.

@lukabogdanovic4658

6 жыл бұрын

Λευτέρης Χατζηγιάννης no 1 000 are from cold war

@spritezeroxxx66

6 жыл бұрын

luka bogdanovic The Soviet union was the world's largest tank producer in the world what the fuck are you talking about. From the Cold War: T-55/54 - 120,000 built T-62 - 22,000 built T-64 - Ca 13,000 built T-72 - 25,000 + T-80 - 4000 built until the fall of the USSR.

@xernos9

6 жыл бұрын

Λευτέρης Χατζηγιάννης russian tank model is soviet

@robertboss9281

6 жыл бұрын

listen USA has 5000 tanks of all cinds that arent barely modernizes and Russia Has 20 000 of modernized tanks

What if America attacked from bases in Alaska?

@muchpandassowow9726

7 жыл бұрын

Matthew Chambers good luck not having all our guys due to the cold lol

@matthewchambers1739

7 жыл бұрын

k

@purwinrommel5568

7 жыл бұрын

+muchpandasowow Alaska is cold, but isn't cold enough to kill hundreds of thousands of men with winter gear.

@matthewchambers1739

7 жыл бұрын

true

@kaktotak8267

7 жыл бұрын

Attack what? What can you attack from Alaska?

In real life we could force Russia to fight a 3 front war. East, West and North.

@DredScott2010

7 жыл бұрын

I think this is how we would win.

@svetleyshiyxd4363

Жыл бұрын

In the north, you don't have such ships that could even reach St. Petersburg. And Russia has similar ships. In the east, we have a wonderful ally-China. Moreover, only the west remains.

@svetleyshiyxd4363

Жыл бұрын

Typical dumb American. Alas, we border you to the east. Are you ready to feel -20 degrees Celsius in summer?🤣 It's very cold in the east. And you can't just walk to Moscow. You will have to control the territory.

@Bluesonofman

Жыл бұрын

@@svetleyshiyxd4363 Honestly we should ally with Russia against China

The real war : Earth : Finnaly the humans are dead now im in peace Also Earth : Wait im nuked

@crocs4304

5 жыл бұрын

It's just a simulation and he said at the end that nuclear war win end in a lose lose situation.

@russiaunion4713

5 жыл бұрын

@@crocs4304 you got the price the dump of the week

@crocs4304

5 жыл бұрын

@@russiaunion4713 Yay! I'm so proud of myself! :D

it is so wonderful that we had an ocean between us)

@meterano7

4 жыл бұрын

yea, roughly 2.4 miles

@shayan5479

3 жыл бұрын

@@Al-hb2wo 🧠

@aajonusvonderplanitz1307

3 жыл бұрын

@@shayan5479 🧠

i guess hitler watched this video in 1941 before invading russia

@trap3400

6 жыл бұрын

*This Binkov troll is Croation, probably a right winger, has some grudge against Russians*

@skyduke2150

6 жыл бұрын

I think I should agree with you about this very true and genuine statement

@juan_thegreat21

5 жыл бұрын

How because KZread wasn't made in 1941

@randomuser5443

5 жыл бұрын

trap3400 Watt

@randomuser5443

5 жыл бұрын

No, he would watch it as the attack happens

This is a great video, true war-gaming, with strategies and equipment analysis rather than the boring simplified number matching you see in far too many videos like this one. I'm so glad I subbed to this channel.

@malokegames

8 жыл бұрын

I can say the same! Good Work in this channel. Liked it very much!

Well I mean, they do fit pretty nice on each other

Do you play World Conqueror ?

Excuse me, sir. you don't go east to Russia from U.S. you go west. Off Alaska.

@keithwenttothemoon

7 жыл бұрын

And invade what exactly? The tundra? Siberia? There are no cities worth taking, no imporant factories to bomb, but maybe some wheat fields.

@shadow83398

7 жыл бұрын

+keithwenttothemoon Vladivostok. Khabarovsk. Komsomolsk-on-Amur. Blagoveshchensk. Yakutsk. Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky. Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk. Nakhodka.

@keithwenttothemoon

7 жыл бұрын

Vladivostok: unimpressive navy presence; Khabarovsk: no real economic or military importance; Komsomolsk-on-Amu: makes some fighter jets, but not many enough to matter. Blagoveshchensk: trades with China, wow; Yakutsk: has diamonds, so important in war; Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky: no economy; Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk: 40% of its businesses are unprofitable; Nakhodka: unimpressive sea trade, wow. If the US invaded all of these places, Russia would barely notice.

@shadow83398

7 жыл бұрын

+keithwenttothemoon you win this round lol

@dominikobora5385

7 жыл бұрын

ya but what about ppl and think about it this way if i take 1$ from you i have a advantage of 2$ since u dont have 1$ and i have 1$ but of course the russian patriots would fight tooth and nail and also its a place where they could mass troops for attack

I want to see one where you bring alliances into play

I love the puppet! 🤣

well,considering the current conflict in ukraine,we know in a conventional war,us would wipe the floor. this does not age well lmao

@SlashinatorZ

2 жыл бұрын

Russia could take our "well regulated militia" aka the proud boys, oath keepers, & NRA nuts. Most of them are cosplayers who have trouble getting up the stairs, only advantage our gun owners have is better guns.

@Wabu_227

Жыл бұрын

You're missing the reason why Russia is performing poorly in the first place. When it comes to Russians being directly invaded by foreign forces, Russians would sure as hell get more public support for the war (which Russia doesn't have in Ukrainian conflict) and morale of Russian armed forces would be more higher and determined. Russians would be surely more harder to deal with when it comes to invasion of Russia itself, even with US victory Americans would have to pay heavy price for that, we can't just copy and paste Russian performance in the Ukrainian conflict with the case with this video.

@kyodairiker

Жыл бұрын

@@Wabu_227 that morale means absolutely nothing if your logistics tactics training and equipment are shit

I going to be honest. This would end in Nuclear War.

@bobhes1212

7 жыл бұрын

TheStewieOne nuclear arms were off limits in this video but yeah modern dat of war would be nukes hahaha lets hope it would never come to that

@RKNGL

7 жыл бұрын

The analysis was military, it wouldn't be much of a fight if we said BAM! 90% of their population is dead that would just be boring.

@Skydmig

7 жыл бұрын

sadly 90% percent of the combined US and RUS population is not all, if both of those countries started an all-out nuclear war : (

@christopheragent006

7 жыл бұрын

TheStewieOne Yes russia has advantage because their country is much larger and spread out would take more nukes. Russia only has to fire 30 satan nukes and U.S would be gone lol.

@RKNGL

7 жыл бұрын

StiffWood Very true such large Nuclear detonations going off at the same time could doom the planetary population. The Planet would fall into nuclear winter making crop growth almost nothing. That's not considering the fact that radioactive material would be raining from the jet stream worldwide for centuries to come, hell if the debris was bad enough it could largely block out the sun light.

i said it in the China vs USA video and now, what would it be like the other way around if USA was on defense and Russia was offense.

@michaeldog123ful

7 жыл бұрын

The idea here was that usa was on the offence because they were winning in the front.

@pira707

7 жыл бұрын

they have more troops more air more navy. Did you even watch the video?

@AlphaWolfShade

7 жыл бұрын

A very short video because U.S. military superiority would halt the advance and quickly flip the script.

@billsmith8577

7 жыл бұрын

If you're at a disadvantage you sh

@kaizersoze

7 жыл бұрын

Idiots still dont uynderstand what you mean in this comment thread it seems. Historically USA only comes to aid of others. RUssia HISTORICALLY invades and takes land.

Diomedes: “Are we forgotten?”

Wait, from what universe is this map from???

GOD FORBIDDEN ! - не дай мог!! no need WAR!!! love and peace!!!

@danchiktv8906

6 жыл бұрын

Отличная идея! Никакой войны и санкции! Great Idea! No war and sanctions!

@nyelement007

6 жыл бұрын

We don't want war.at least most Americans. Don't listen to the stupid ones posting on KZread.

@xernos9

6 жыл бұрын

Edgar Mkrtumyan fuck you armenia

@elmatador11

6 жыл бұрын

klni mior esel kexni kxpen irar kprcnen

@xernos9

6 жыл бұрын

Armenian World of Tanks fuck you armenia!

Finland vs Russia? Maybe no k all leave

@mikeyryu232

7 жыл бұрын

it allready happened *COUGHS* Simo Hayha but I am not sure why finland would attack Russia today

@imransuleymaneraslan2797

7 жыл бұрын

W.C Productions lol xd

@mikeyryu232

7 жыл бұрын

Oh yeah they invaded Crimea for oil so let's invade Finland!

@armennazarian7097

7 жыл бұрын

The Game Goop Russia didn't invade crimea for oil they invaded because the population was ethnically Russian and was tired of being suppressed by Ukraine, Crimea was never Ukraine's to claim it's allways been russian and it wasn't until 1918 till it was first encorperated in a Ukrainian state.

@mikeyryu232

7 жыл бұрын

OOOOH well rip random youtuber channels saying he was only invading for oil

he's geography skills tho

Can you do an actual geography map war

wow some many russian haters

@awasp6344

8 жыл бұрын

russian haters? russia would lose a land war with USA. Pointing out the truth aint hating.

@PedjoGT

8 жыл бұрын

+Evan Wilson In real war situation...land war will be disaster for US against Russia

@awasp6344

8 жыл бұрын

+Pedjo Gt no it wont, US troops and tanks are better and more trainrd.

@awasp6344

8 жыл бұрын

trained*

@awasp6344

8 жыл бұрын

+Pedjo Gt most russian forces are extremly outdated, they use cold war AK47's, and AK74U's. face 7t, USA would win.

At the end of the video, Binkov must have forget that USA and Russia are very close at the Bering strait.

USA has particle uplink cannons and Russia has iron curtain

Key for a Russian victory: Wait until Winter...

@izakdelacruz5873

7 жыл бұрын

Key for a Russian victory. A key to the "oh shit, I'm at war with the USA what do I do now" room

@robertstorey1665

7 жыл бұрын

This isn't world war 2 and the United States isn't Germany. I hope you were joking.

@geopixels6886

7 жыл бұрын

Robert Storey 1) Get a sense of humor. Yes it was a joke 2) Have YOU heard of Napoleon?

@toastedroasted758

7 жыл бұрын

Geo & Pixels He probably didn't get the joke because a bunch of morons in this comment section actually think Russian winter would be a key to victory while fighting the United States.

@Chinaball-fx7gi

6 жыл бұрын

Geo & Pixels key for american victory in winter: take fucking antifreeze and warm clothing

I believe that Russia is 10 years ahead of the US technology, but they are way more secretative because of Putin. Putin is playing chess, while the rest of us Poker.

@kabloosh699

7 жыл бұрын

Ha, yeah ok.

@firebird4491

7 жыл бұрын

DeadPoolGR I seriously doubt Russia is a decade ahead in technology.

@firebird4491

7 жыл бұрын

DeadPoolGR except in their tanks however not a fucking decade ahead.

@LiveAndDie54

7 жыл бұрын

Believe it or not the US does hide its top of the line equipment. Also they spend an insane amount of money on military equipment.

@deadpoolgr7467

7 жыл бұрын

Jordan guy I know x10 times thats of Russia. U.S. spends 500B, while Russia 50B.

You know how about this: instead of bickering about who would win, how about we uhh... NOT GO TO FUCKING WAR?

Great vid, although I think the music is a bit loud and occasionally makes it harder to concentrate on the content.

Is that World Conquerer 2 music?

@SamiVideo.Channel

6 жыл бұрын

Generic Secondary Character ye

@marcusstaddon7096

6 жыл бұрын

Yeh lol

You forgot we have AGM-88s to deal with Russia's SAM threat.

@dixievfd55

7 жыл бұрын

You can't jam a Harm. And I doubt your claim.

@dixievfd55

7 жыл бұрын

Wrong again. The Harm targeting pod is a passive sensor and cannot be jammed. Nigh impossible to get close? Have you ever heard of terrain masking? NOE flight? Stealth? We also have our own airborne jammers like the EA-6B. We don't have to jam all your defenses, just the ones near enough to threaten a strike package which will contain planes carrying at least two Harms each. They will get close enough and they will launch on your SAMs. It's called rolling back defenses. We will also do the same with waves of cruise missiles. You cannot shoot them all down.

@dixievfd55

7 жыл бұрын

We have aerial jammers and ECM pods to get close enough to those SAM sites to deliver Harms on target. As far as I know radar still does not penetrate hills and AWACS aircraft cannot stay on station forever. As for stealth, I do agree it is expensive to pursue but the Pentagon wants to anyway with that POS F-35. An F-16 beat it in a dogfight so I am very sure Russian fighters can handle it quite well.

@dixievfd55

7 жыл бұрын

Jammers don't have to have long range. They don't have to jam the radar site just the missile. Yeah some of them would get shot down, but you can't shoot them all down. It is the nature of war that some of the strikers would get through to hit their targets. An F-16, one of the fighters the F-35 is replacing, beat it. A Flanker can beat it. I have a lot of respect for Russian fighters.

@AlphaWolfShade

7 жыл бұрын

You do know the plane can still evade missiles long enough to strike a target and that modern day war craft are more than capable of shaking off some homing missiles right? Especially considering how skilled active service pilots are.

I wonder, would the climate be completely different on one side of the border in this scenario?

The whole "sacrificing land for time" tactic was one of the ways russia survived against the Nazi forces in WW2, in technology and force differences the Nazi forces advantages over russia back then are not dissimilar to the USA advantages over the russians today. Its not impossible to imagine that the USA would be forced to retreat simply due to Russia being far too much territory for the USA to effectivly seize and control (even while factoring out Anti-occupation rebellions and uprisings) However this only means that russia would be cabable of defending her homeland, its extremely doubtful that russia could prosecute a land invasion and occupation of the USA simply due to the higher likelihood of uprisings (due to how patriotic and loyal americans tend to be) coupled with the fact that areas like the Great plains and southern USA are just far too huge for russia to effectively control and supress. Without allied assistance its unlikely that either country could effectivly occupy the other, meaning (without nuclear exchanges) the war would most likely stagnate with massive losses on both sides by the end.

@staswiat

7 жыл бұрын

Nazis had way less man power compared to Russia. USA is wealthier, has double the population and is technologically superior, Russia would not be able to stagnate them.

@cmdrgarbage1895

7 жыл бұрын

But at the moment Russia get's their shit faster and better together then the US.

@Spider58x

7 жыл бұрын

So? None that matters when you have to attack from an ocean away and nukes is involved which means there is no ground war to speak of making manpower completely irreverent. See Vietnam war just to see how completely irreverent those numbers are.. Wars aren't' won on paper. USA attacking Russia is an complete nightmare

@cmdrgarbage1895

7 жыл бұрын

Spider58x It actually does matter. At one point the Russian Federation shall pass the USA.

@Spider58x

7 жыл бұрын

Alternate History: Wars That makes zero sense at all.

i think it could be cool to see an simulaiton like that about UE VS china.

@bobhes1212

7 жыл бұрын

gamecube-king/ devon3 i hears china's army is really weak.. But of course they have the numbers. But even japan handled them in world war 2

@gamecubekingdevon3

7 жыл бұрын

Russel Crowe japan handled them because: china forces only had a little number of weapon given by ussr (and sometimes by the 3rd reich....yes that s very strange but there where chineese warriors with german WWII gears!) and japan forces where trained for fight in swamp (that s the first reason why imperial tanks had so ridiculous ground pressure comparated to occidental tanks) but now, china is in industrial era, and got an big production capacity (that s why actually most of the thing u can buy come from china, in the 40's most of the thing where made in USA or made in europe) and USA got some economic debt that they must refund to china, so, american economy could be severaly affected at the beginning of a war. about the chineese army actually, they began to produce some modern equipement since 80's/90's and to sell the old soviet era shits to poor contry to make money, as an exemple: they now got some fight drones like american and european have, and their last tank (the ZTZ99, called too type 99 or WZ123) is cappable of defeat an occidental tank. (during the 70's, after mao death, china had some projects and exchanges with UE and USA, and tested some mix beetweens soviet, germany, and american design on prototypes like the "WZ122" and "WZ1224") about the infantry gear, they made copy of the american and european most popular gear, (they copy the M88/PASGT kevlar helmet) that s another reason why chineese army could be dangerous, they don't got only the number, but, during decades, they learned and acquired, and made copy of some advanced technologies, so now, they got good weapons (not the best of the best, but as good as american weapons) so, i think an chineese victory could be possible.

@bobhes1212

7 жыл бұрын

Alex Mercer china's modern military still uses broke and old weaponry. BUT it's improving rapidly

Make another Arena war with England vs Japan, the island nations on the artificial island with their land mass and who would win? either 16th century or modern day.

wtf happen to the sound mix

HOW THE FUCK DID I GET HERE!?!?!?

Couple of inconsistencies. First Russia's reserve personnel stands at 2 million, not 10-80 thousand and there are huge stockpiles of AK-47 (enough to arm most of them). Second, I understand that this is a comparison of military tech and capability, however I find morale and human factor to be a huge part of the equation. If Russia is in a defensive position, and in the given scenario it is, as any previous invader in such a position US must expect heavy partisan action on its rear in its push to Moscow. Moreover, historically, technologically superior armies have consistently failed in conquering Russia. Germans in 1941 had a much bigger technological advantage over the USSR then modern US holds over Russia. Also we must also take into consideration the public opinion and the economy. Prolonged conflict in Russia, will cause american public to resent the war (kinda like Vietnam but with 10 times more casualties). Realistically this war would result with US withdrawal and a piece agreement.

@ColonelBragg

7 жыл бұрын

I'm going to assume any world where the United States is invading Russia is likely under some sort of dictatorship or retaliating against a nuclear attack or something if that was the case the American Public would be out for blood and wouldn't rest until Russia was only a name in a history book

@hoy455

7 жыл бұрын

yeah superior russian stronk win 24/7 crush crummy amerikkkan capitalizts!!!!!!!!

@LORD66623

7 жыл бұрын

Well even a dictatorship cares about the public opinion because ignoring it can result in an uprising. Also Russia's population is more used to economical deprivations as seen in the recent Crimea Crisis. US population would not endure the war burden as much (I mean look at Iraq and Vietnam). Even if we don't consider public opinion and such, it will all come down to the focus of the military. True the US would win the war at sea, after all that's the main focus of the US military. However, no one can win a land war with Russia, and I bet lots of strategists from West Point would concur with me on this. Russia's military is built to fight on land and has the twice the number of tanks and stronger air defenses, I don't see how US forces can break through, considering they won't be able to use their air superiority.

@ColonelBragg

7 жыл бұрын

LORDER I consider that more because the United States had basically been in perpetual war since the second world war when it comes to Veitnam

@ColonelBragg

7 жыл бұрын

I believe in a conventional war the United States would annihilate Russia fairly quickly if nuclear weapons were out of the question because most of its tanks are obsolete T72 tanks and most of its soldiers are poorly trained conscripts the United States could easily fuck russia up economically anyways it basically has already been doing that