BS. The bradley did not destroy a T-90 Tank. Drones were responsible.

@camf7522

2 ай бұрын

But the Bradley’s crew did disable the T90 enough that the crew dismounted.

@winstonsmith7801

2 ай бұрын

@@camf7522 A drone would have destroyed it without the bradley's help.

@camf7522

2 ай бұрын

@@winstonsmith7801 or maybe the damage made by the Bradley and the fact the T90 became uninhabitable made it possible for the drone to make the final blow?

@winstonsmith7801

2 ай бұрын

@@camf7522 Who cares , days later that Bradley was blown to bits. 3 Abrams have been destroyed in a week , no tracked vehicle is safe in this conflict.

@niclasjohansson4333

2 ай бұрын

​@@winstonsmith7801NO, the drones hit the tank after its been abandond and the hatches left open!

How many weeks more you will keep showing the same fight which is over a month old

In Desert Storm we could take out T-64 and older tanks by targeting the turret ring but the T-72 we had to use the TOW missile. Now it the Russians did not beef up the turret ring on the T-90, I could see a small chance of the 25mm to destroy it.

@winstonsmith7801

2 ай бұрын

Rubbish.

@chrissmith-rw8ei

2 ай бұрын

Rubbish about what ?@@winstonsmith7801

The gunner was lucky to hit the guidance device right away. The T-90 has a system that immediately turns the turret towards the threat, automatically. Apparently the shooter hit it and damaged it, which led to the uncontrolled rotation of the turret. This saved the Bradley crew, I saw this video in full, there were 2 Bradleys. Despite the damage, the T-90 tried to fight. What you mistook for the activation of active armor was actually shooting off a smoke screen; active armor did not work in this battle. The T-90 crew acted resourcefully, they used the environment to stop the turret from rotating, tried to disengage from the battle and shot off the smoke screens twice. At this time, two Bradleys fired at them with a full combat reserve. And a Ukrainian drone arrived, but the T-90 crew remained alive and were able to leave the car. I don’t think that any of the other tanks could have withstood such an attack, and Bradley was lucky that the T-90 was without support...

no destruction evidence, this video has been analysed by several experts - this is a detonation of active armor

@celestialsatheist1535

2 ай бұрын

Who are these ' experts ' in the literal same video the cannon of the tank was blown off

@aFrozenSun2022

2 ай бұрын

@@celestialsatheist1535 when russian tank explodes it's Turret is blown off - this is because of circle placement of charges inside turret. Just search for videos and fotos of destroyed tanks. Here we can see just fiery horizontal detonation, and this looks like a detonation of active armor. No video or photo evidence of destroyed tank in this video.

@celestialsatheist1535

2 ай бұрын

@@aFrozenSun2022 haha what is this. Yes just said russian tanks turrets gets blown off and than no evidence of destroyed tanks?

@aFrozenSun2022

2 ай бұрын

@@celestialsatheist1535 this video do not show us that the tank was destroyed. I do not claim they are invincible.

@celestialsatheist1535

2 ай бұрын

@@aFrozenSun2022 this video doesn't but the full original video does

Dude - where you getting your info from This T-90 incident was a "one of" and was hit with more than just the Bradlyey These Bradley are not good on the front lines which has been exposed this last 2 weeks Prior to that they were kept in the background away from any combat

It didn't destroy the T-90...it drove away and got hit by an FPV drone which destroyed it, and the crew survived...then later the same week the Bradley crew lost their vehicle.

@Sparkletron

2 ай бұрын

The Bradley rendered the T-90 inoperative. The tank was no longer a threat to anyone but its own crew (which is why they vacated the tank). Arguing that it was the drone that actually performed the coup de grace isn't particularly significant.

The tactical question really is, why is one tank by itself? That is a recipe for defeat. That, and crew training, are why the T90 isn't doing well. The Ukrainians are simply better with a vehicle that should be the lesser.

This just sounds like propaganda, the reality is the bradley got lucky with its round placement and a drone finished the T90 off, the crew where obviously not very well trained and if they were that Bradley wouldn't have stood a chance.

where's footage of all the destroyed Abrams?

@celestialsatheist1535

2 ай бұрын

Must be hard to find as the battle find is litter with su 34s

@mat_j

2 ай бұрын

@@celestialsatheist1535 its not hard to find , there a multitude of videos. Of course ukraine doesn't need proof we need to belive anything they say...

@DutchTulipStonks

2 ай бұрын

I have it saved, do you want me to send you it?

@hanshuber1875

2 ай бұрын

@@celestialsatheist1535 like those ten Su34 shot down by ukraine the last two weeks?

@celestialsatheist1535

2 ай бұрын

@@mat_j hilariously enough Russia admitted that their aircraft ' crushed '

The turret of the T90 was disabled by the smoke screen, it exploded otherwise the T90 peppered the bradleys. Look how many shots it takes, if the turret was not disabled it peppered the Bradleys easy.

Russia's most advanced tank is the T-14 Armata not the T-90.

@hanshuber1875

2 ай бұрын

Yeah and its a papertiger, nothing else.

@TDS1108Gaming

2 ай бұрын

*FIELDABLE

@Jermo7899

2 ай бұрын

Where is it if it’s so good?

@aFrozenSun2022

2 ай бұрын

"It's good but too expensive to be deployed on a battlefield".)))

@hanshuber1875

2 ай бұрын

@@aFrozenSun2022 its so stealthy, no one has ever seen anyone on the battlefield. No for real, russia cant mass produce them.

In fact two Bradleys and one uav

bradley VS T90,,,, while russia, Lancet VS leopard, caesars, abrams, humvey, and so on, 35 thousand dollars VS millions dollars vehicles? hmmmmm....

Training and proficiency is the key to combat capability.

@D-E-S_8559

2 ай бұрын

TRUE! you know it to be a fact that the T90 got ambushed by not 1 but 2 Bradley's---the T90 crew made a basic errors, by allowing the nearest Brad to engage it on its broadside instead of trusting their sensors and charging at the NEAREST Brad to take it out first before hunting the 2nd Brad. That simple basic mistake coupled with bad luck of the turret control mechanism failing and causing it to uncontrollably spin-off, and deny the T90 targeting ability was crucial, but I highly doubt can be repeated....

While the Bradley showcased exceptional performance in this confrontation, it's important to clarify some inaccuracies presented in the video. Firstly, the Bradley primarily serves as an infantry fighting vehicle but it is has a reputation of anti-tanks too. Secondly, it's worth noting that the T-90, while a formidable tank, is not the pinnacle of Russian armored technology; the Armata platform represents Russia's most advanced tank design. Thirdly, the T-90 was not destroyed but rather tactically withdrew from the engagement

Abrams tanks destroyed by drones.

Poor training vs good training!

@petermilne9598

2 ай бұрын

Presume you meaning the UA poor

@vanroeling2930

2 ай бұрын

@@petermilne9598 it’s the poor training of the Russian tank corps which I’m referring to

Well I ask also can a Bradley take a hit from T-90 cannon hit?

@dudemom953

2 ай бұрын

No, the Bradley’s armor is not meant to withstand tank rounds because it’s a infantry fighting vehicles

The tank wasn't destroyed but the Bradley was lost with all crew the following day.

What are you Americans doing in Ukraine when you don't even know where it is on the map?!

@celestialsatheist1535

2 ай бұрын

Tiktoke university graduate located

@hanshuber1875

2 ай бұрын

we europeans know and we remember, how often russia lied in the past. Also the russian cruelty about every state, that prefers democracy over russian stupidity.

@gon3946

2 ай бұрын

Helping to free sovereignty and independence of Invaded country

@petermilne9598

2 ай бұрын

@@gon3946 Really :-) Wake up - they are the ones who are responsible for this war - and I am ex Ukraine

@celestialsatheist1535

2 ай бұрын

@@petermilne9598 yes ' ex Ukrainian ' as if nationality can be dropped like that

this is the reactive armor exploding, where is the "destruction"? tanks don't explode from the outside, they don't even explode like that. no proof, just a damaged tank with a perfectly cut video

@Sparkletron

2 ай бұрын

Who cares if it was "destroyed" (per each person's definition of what that entails). The bottom line is that a Bradley bested a T-90 tank by blinding it and damaging it to the point were it was no longer operational or a threat to anyone but its crew. There's no spinning this by debating what a "destroyed" tank means.

@balerionsmith4038

2 ай бұрын

@@Sparkletron if you don't know what destruction means go read a book kid, you are making fun of yourself

So you are a red flag not to watched you misrepresent the truth and facts

US Army nedeed 4-5 Shermans to kill 1 King Tiger tank! And who won the war???

@user-kr4fb1mm1h

Ай бұрын

Вторую мировую войну в Европе вытащил СССР. Посмотрите на количество войск со всех сторон.

wow... the bs this channel spews. The Bradley did not destroy the t90.

So, did the Bradleys stop the Russians from capturing Avdiivka?

Rusdia has not used its T 14 tank whoch is their bew top tank yet. Also three bradlies have already been destroyed

@paulruano1903

2 ай бұрын

Plenty of Bradleys has been destroyed so far. Dozens leopards. And at least 4 Abrahams have been destroyed. (2 normal Abrahams and 2 re-purposed Abrahams that was refitted as mineclearingvehicles).

Also, the T 90 as a maximum speed of 4 km/h in reserve

Next Brad Pitt movie story

Amazing things can happen on the battle field at any time were the little guy takes down the big guy by being at the right angle hitting the soft spot at the right speed with the right type of shell and this look like that, we call it a fluke (an accidental advantage; stroke of good luck)

menurut saya hari itu kebruntungan bagi bradley.di kemudian hari nasip bradley ta slamat dari serangan tank 80bv😂

west tales of ukraine.

Why didn't the Bradley use it's missles the brad crew got lucky and know it i would guess a drone did most of the damage

Smoke screens from T-90 ?????? just asking !

That mean that roman model of thinking is superior.... polish sociotechnic school by Joseph Kossecki... that is an answer for all questions.

Russia appears to have validated its "empty tin cans" claim about American Abrams tanks. According to the Russian Defence Ministry, another Abrams tank has been destroyed. The duel between Russian T-72B3 and U.S.-supplied armour occurred near Avdiivka. The U.S.-sent armour "was knocked out" by the crew of the Russian T-72B3 in "one shot."_____courtesy Hindustan Times

They can’t never shut up with those statements, how funny.

Hmm, paper tiger...

Like when a RPG on a drone destroyed Abrams tank

@hanshuber1875

2 ай бұрын

Russia lost 3000tanks, so i think there are much more videos about destroyed Russian tanks.

@leight420

2 ай бұрын

@@hanshuber1875russia is making more tanks than its losing, cant say the same for the west

@Jermo7899

2 ай бұрын

@@leight420listen to Russian state media much?

@Jermo7899

2 ай бұрын

@@leight420 The guys comment above you is right. Thousands of Russian tank destroyed. Even Russias game changers. Then it’s suddenly world news when 1 American tank is killed. Give me a break. You pro putlers never disappoint with the comedy. So what’s Russias excuse for losing 3 massive ships including battlecruisers and a brand new state of the art ship(according to Russia) that was just built last year, 2,000 tanks and over 250,000 personnel. Bring the excuses. And no they are not making new tanks. They’re refurbishing old ones. Don’t believe me. Listen to the Russian crews tasked with driving them.

@hanshuber1875

2 ай бұрын

@@leight420No they dont. We see older and older tanks with less capable sights. You are telling bs.

Abram’s damage control, I understand this channel now.

LOOOL you know it to be a fact that the T90 got ambushed by not 1 but 2 Bradley's---the T90 crew made a basic errors, by allowing the nearest Brad to engage it on its broadside instead of trusting their sensors and charging at the NEAREST Brad to take it out first before hunting the 2nd Brad. That simple basic mistake coupled with bad luck of the turret control mechanism failing and causing it to uncontrollably spin-off, and deny the T90 targeting ability was crucial, but I highly doubt can be repeated....

It's because it was 2 against 1. Now I'm sure we could debate their crews training, and which way the wind was blowing, but IBPH, it will always be because it was '2 against 1' to me. It can too easily be argued that the only thing this proves is now is that it takes 2 American Bradly's to defeat just 1 Russia T90. I would love to revisit this discussion after enough 1on1 data becomes available for further analysis.

Т-90 был перед боем не исправен, зачем эту ерунду говорить

минус в т90 двигатель слабоват. задния скорость.

In my country we say "I ćorava koka zrno ubode", which means even the blind chinken hits the seed. I would NOT want my life to depend on bradleys armour. That machine could be blown out by the WW2 tank.

Most advanced russian tank is T14

This is all propaganda

booth bradleys and t90 retreated successfully from this engagement. im actually glad all crews survived. this war is bs and your channel is full of s. get real. those are someone's children inside. wtf.

Wonderful

❤

I am very sad to see your videos change I am now and like many others going to stop watching until you stop posting 2 month old vidoes

💙💛💪✌️

Copium channel 😁

Narration too propagandistic for my taste. But the facts were good, as far as I could tell. Imperium Americanum delenda est

@hanshuber1875

2 ай бұрын

haha a ivan complaining about to much propaganda? Imperium Russia delenda est.

You lee vous mentez majorités des brandleys is destroyed by russian armé 😂😂😂😂

That seems a rather special event, so I do not need to say what everything went wrong here, but obviously tanks should not be isolated... It however remembers the scene how Bradley Pitt was able to eliminate a Tiger tank in the movie Fury, where we all know that the german tanks mainly were stopped by the allied air forces (I don't hear Wittmann here!), no that is not suspicious, I would never say that......

I defy you to prove a "one meter thick" armor on the T-90. That is a gross lie. And the fact the Bradley defeated it should prove without a doubt just how crappy russian equipment is.

Russia military is LAUGHABLE ...

All that war thunder paid off 😂😂