this map is all wrong. The Croats weren't striped. They're checkered. It's a big difference.

@barivs8736

2 жыл бұрын

😂

This representation is heavily biased to modern countries. Example Hungary, Eastern and South Austria were slavic speaking places before the year 1000.

@dowmont6209

3 жыл бұрын

And partly Romania and Moldova,and germany.

@alakazor9643

3 жыл бұрын

@@dowmont6209 Moldova actually was completely slavic before vlachs migration.

@reikers

3 жыл бұрын

@@alakazor9643 nope, vlach means strange/stranger/foreigner in old slavon or slavic, they gave them this name because they didn't speak a slavic language and they couldn't understand them, they already lived in modern day romania, but not around the sea

@alakazor9643

3 жыл бұрын

@@reikers Vlachs migration in modern Moldova was started in near X-XI centuries, before this moment it was completely slavic.

@reikers

3 жыл бұрын

@@alakazor9643 it was more avar not slavic

2:20 let's just take a moment to acknowledge barcode romania

@_utahraptor

4 жыл бұрын

Epic

@iulianneghina4870

3 жыл бұрын

This is because the Old Church Slavonic functioned for the Romanian church as well as for the state chancelleries as an official language for many hundreds of years. It had the same status that Latin had for the Catholic Church. As the monasteries held the cultural monopoly of the Romanian space, OldChurchSlavonic continued to Slavicize the Romanian language also because the Orthodox Church saw Latin as an exponent of the Catholic Church (the enemy). Proper names, toponyms, river names, have been translated into Slavonic, remaining to this day in the official toponymy. The Cyrillic alphabet was used to write in Romanian until the middle of the 19th century, etc

Reuploaded to improve some points and fix some graphics problems

@historyfin1234

4 жыл бұрын

I don't know if the spead of Eastern Slavic/Russian was that fast into Karelia/North. But I might be wrong. There is little knoledge/information about that. But there's atleat one mistake that I am sure. There was atleast no Russian speaking population in the Finnish Karelia(1917-1940/1944). After the WW2 Karelia was repopulared with mostly Russian speakers due to every Karelian and Finnish people leaving the "Old (Finnish) Karelia". I'm not sure about the situation during (1812-1917), but even then there must have very 'few' Russian speakers. There was maybe no Russia speakers in the northern "Finnish Karelia" due to that been part of Sweden (1658-1721). But its hard to say.

@user-cl7pm7zm3x

4 жыл бұрын

Where is Yaik cossaks? which conquere in the 16th century Nogay Horde en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ural_Cossacks and, at least to the 20 century they was majority of Ural river population

@Oleksij_Shelest

4 жыл бұрын

@@user-cl7pm7zm3x Because Moxel "Cossacks" are finno-turkic people. They wouldn't even understand a single Slavic word.

@user-cl7pm7zm3x

4 жыл бұрын

@@Oleksij_Shelest Ural cosacks spoke on Finougric language? very interesting. Why they have russish names?

@Oleksij_Shelest

4 жыл бұрын

@@user-cl7pm7zm3x I think you use too untruthful history book to make any statement that I would believe into it.

Somebody needs to make a meme with Cyrill and Methodius saying "Slav, my son, you're a Christian now. Now it's time for you to choose between an alphabet we specially made for your language to fit it's phonetics, or you can choose an alphabet originally invented to write Etruscan and use shitloads of diacritics and digraphs. Catholic Slavs: Szczieczjaščžju

@madziamaddie9948

2 жыл бұрын

Przeszkadza Ci to? xD

@kryn1u

2 жыл бұрын

ur wrong actually, cyryllic dont have proper phonetics for polish language. that's why we use ą ę ś ć ż ź

@kryn1u

2 жыл бұрын

@Zoej source?

@vampir1451

2 жыл бұрын

@@kryn1u little yus (ѧ) represents ę, big yus (ѫ) represents ą

@dragskcinnay3184

2 жыл бұрын

@Zoej true, early cyrillic ѫ and ѧ for nasal vowels, but it never had any letters to distinguish cz from ć, sz from ś and rz/ż from ź...

Slavic influence enter in Romanian territory Italics: Damn you!

@chuckbrotton2449

3 жыл бұрын

Only as a liturgical language is Eastern Orthodox worship and scholarship

@PhoeniX-jc2vq

3 жыл бұрын

@Osama Bin Laden West Slavs and East Slavs may be like that because of Russia. South Slavs... you know why. :)

@DEIYIAN

3 жыл бұрын

@@chuckbrotton2449 The nowadays territory of Romania was inhabited by Slavic speakers since the very beginning. Just a natural melting pot culturally and genetically. Another aspect is that during the Romanian renascence in the 19-th century some thousand words of Slavic (not to say Bulgarian) origin were mechanically swapped with French, Italian or Latin ones, but that is also a normal process. Yet there are maybe not less than 10% of Slavic words in use and countless toponyms. Also the Romanian is part of the Balkan Linguistic Community with Albanian, Bulgarian and Greek. It was not a matter of bureaucracy like the Latin in the West.

@MeszikeChannel

2 жыл бұрын

@@chuckbrotton2449 Nope, there is many slavic placename in modern Romania.

@AlexanderSSI

2 жыл бұрын

@@DEIYIAN The whole of Europe was a melting pot, the area of Romania today is no different. And there was no "mechanical" removal of words. You can take a text before and after and you'll see no major differences. What actually happened is that during the "Romanian Rennaisance" alot of loanwords were introduced from the French language just like today we have alot of loanwords for IT/computer stuff from English. "The nowadays territory of Romania was inhabited by Slavic speakers since the very beginning" - Yeah, right! The Dacians/Getae/Tharcians/Carpians, even the Celts were in present-day territory of Romania earlier than the Slavs. What is the "beginning" for you lol?

Greeting SLAVIC LANGUAGEAS 🇵🇱🇷🇺🇧🇾🇷🇸🇺🇦🇭🇷🇸🇮🇧🇬🇧🇦🇲🇰

@TheOlgaSasha

3 жыл бұрын

You also forgot 🇨🇿🇸🇰🇲🇪

@luphemalc

3 жыл бұрын

@@TheOlgaSasha Pochoże dlja nego czechy, slowaky i ćernogorcy ne braťja. Nawernoe, oni jego ćem-to obideli :)

@exquaze3785

3 жыл бұрын

Cześć bracie

@user-je2ep6xj7o

3 жыл бұрын

Russian is not slavic.

@artemi6057

3 жыл бұрын

Вітаю

Old Novgorod dialect that was spoken in North Russia until 16th century is missing. It was very different from Old Russian, could be classified as its own branch(North Slavic)

@KIRILL-fl7cp

4 жыл бұрын

Not very but different from Rostov - Suzdal dialect. And from the combiantion of these two dialects the Old Russian has developed.

@Oleksij_Shelest

4 жыл бұрын

@@KIRILL-fl7cp Good joke.

@KIRILL-fl7cp

4 жыл бұрын

@@Oleksij_Shelest Joke is ukranian propaganda you believe my friend

@Oleksij_Shelest

4 жыл бұрын

@@KIRILL-fl7cp Sad. You can't make it better.

@ChirkunovIvan

4 жыл бұрын

It was not very different. It had some minor, but unique features, but basically, it was completely mutually understandable with other East Slavic dialects.

I like your map style.

@Oleksij_Shelest

4 жыл бұрын

Agree

@MargaritaMagdalena

3 жыл бұрын

Looks like a reg map to me tbh

@arta.xshaca

Жыл бұрын

@@MargaritaMagdalena so what

Ha: I am a Sorbian.

@Nista357

3 жыл бұрын

Hello brother from Serbia! 🥰

@r.t.5767

3 жыл бұрын

@@Nista357 Sorbs are from Lusatia, not from Serbia :D

@r.t.5767

3 жыл бұрын

Hi, greetings from polish neighbour!

@Nista357

3 жыл бұрын

@@r.t.5767 Sorbs are from Serbs that went to help Samo's empire and great Moravia against the Vatican and Teutonic genocide later. We are relatives. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pavle_Juri%C5%A1i%C4%87_%C5%A0turm

@Nista357

3 жыл бұрын

@@r.t.5767 Hello brothers in PL! 🤍❤✊✊✊

All in all really good video, jut several Slavic languages have longer history of their grammar than the video suggests (Bulgarian, Slovene, Slovak, to name a few) and the fluctuations of geographical extent of some of them have been slightly bigger than shown here.

@881terror

2 жыл бұрын

you know that Slovaks + Moravians and Panonian Slavs had one name: Slovieni

@Rhosus

2 жыл бұрын

@@881terror that's not exactly right either, it's like saying that "only" these slavic people were called slavs, which in fact were all the other ones too... since slovieni literally means "slav"... People oftentimes forget that humans back then didn't differenciate between each other that much when it came to nationality and so they went "ah yes, I'm slav" (funnily enough it also means that great moravia's true name is "kingdom of the slavs" and it's ruler was "king of slavs")

@Ponanoix

Жыл бұрын

​@@Rhosus They were calling themselves Slavs probably because there was not something like a sense of nationality back then and all Slavic people used to call themselves similarly. They would probably call other Slavs, well, "Slavs", so "People of the word (those who can speak [our language])" and non-Slavs "Mutes" / "Nemci" (people who cannot speak [our language])

@pavlesevaljevic4623

Жыл бұрын

​@@Ponanoixhow do you expalin north and south Sorbs in Lužica in germany and south Sorbs in Polan in relation to Serbs from Balkan. It is known that Lutschich Serbs had their "kneževina: in 600-700 a.c. They still live in that land which is not taken into acount on this map. It would be great if the video could be corected and posted again so that there would be no more missunderstandings left.

@kungszigfrids1482

Жыл бұрын

This video starts from when slavic split off from baltic. I think its reasonable since he doesnt start the video about germanic langauges from PIE either.

Make baltic languages next! And then finno-ugric languages.

@CostasMelas

4 жыл бұрын

Baltic possibly to be done soon

@celtofcanaanesurix2245

4 жыл бұрын

I'm so Unusual Well you got your wish

@ZordragRF

3 жыл бұрын

German and schweden!

@Ponanoix

Жыл бұрын

​@@ZordragRF Germanic languages

@Tito_Barleti

Жыл бұрын

You can add "please".

Very good map, its just biased towards modern borders and demographics. For example parts of Austria and the panonian basin were slavic speaking before the year 1000 and northern albania was predominantly slavic before the ottoman conquest, judging by ottoman tax reports. And kosovo was majority slavic until pretty recently.

@skend3489

2 жыл бұрын

Wrong about Kosovo. Its Majority Albanian since hundreds of years. Whats pretty recently for you?

@viktormilosevic8172

2 жыл бұрын

@@skend3489 What does "since hundreds of years ago" mean to you. Albanians started settling there in larger numbers in the 18th century after the area was left depopulated from Ottoman reprisals. The settlers were were largely catholic but were forced to adopt islam soon after. After that point the Albanian population slowly rose up while the Serb population was dwindling due to atrocities commited by the Turks before the balkan wars, Bulgarians during WW1, Italians during WW2 encouraging Albanian irredentism, a standard divide and conquer strategy. After the world wars, Tito has plans for Albania to join Yugoslavia and the key was gifting kosovo to it so he made no effort to bring back the displaced families from the second world war. After that the Yugoslav wars marked the latest exodus of serbs from both Kosovo and other parts of former Yugoslavia. I hope this answers your question

@skend3489

2 жыл бұрын

@@viktormilosevic8172 Even if it is True why should it matter now? You cant just Kick them out of their homes they didnt ask to be Born There, they didnt do anything to you but live in a land. And Kosovo had always had an Albanien Pop.

@skend3489

2 жыл бұрын

@@viktormilosevic8172 Do you see where im going at? Todays Albanians in Kosova didnt emigrate they were just Born there they know nothing else. We dont have to argue over autochtony because what mattere is that we are all humans and humans wander and borders were always shifting in history. The Balkans is a Special case because of all the big Empires that were ruling over it for thousands of years.

@skend3489

2 жыл бұрын

I can Tell you that northern albania was Never slavic. Since thousands of years only Albanians lived there

No one: Comments: "This is the russian/greek/ukrainian propaganda!"

@dgsf9444

4 жыл бұрын

@Multorum Unum Hieronymus Bosch "The Garden of Earthly Delights"

@dgsf9444

4 жыл бұрын

@Multorum Unum Your welcome!

@admetan

4 жыл бұрын

Привіт from Ukraine

@dgsf9444

4 жыл бұрын

@Чичо Радко That means that people act like that without visible reasons.

@user-lc7hv1mb4c

4 жыл бұрын

Чё?

4:17 Top 10 Saddest Anime Deaths

@Pingijno

4 жыл бұрын

rip polabian

@_utahraptor

4 жыл бұрын

The only dead slavic language

@kreuzritter4898

4 жыл бұрын

i don't see anything

@konstantinkaramales7449

3 жыл бұрын

@@Pingijno where was spoken this language?

@Turagrong

3 жыл бұрын

2:10 man, 2:10...

Video: History of the Slavs. Slavs: *aggressively hate each other in the comments*

@goranjovic3174

9 ай бұрын

Samo sloga Slovene Spasava! 😊❤ Slava velikom Slovenskom rodu!

@Tomukmakto

2 ай бұрын

No. We love each other 🤗

@roddbroward9876

16 күн бұрын

To be fair the map does need some improvements.

@kociewiak208

3 сағат бұрын

Najlepsi jesteśmy my - Polacy - bo najbardziej nienawidzimy samych siebie, A potem wykorzystują to nasi sąsiedzi i nas podbijają.

Rest in peace polabian slavs conquered by germans

@olaful5343

3 жыл бұрын

They are not killed

@user-qu2ol7fz1z

3 жыл бұрын

@@olaful5343 but are forcibly assimilated

@johngalt1448

3 жыл бұрын

If it were not for Russia, most, if not all, Slavs would have been overrun by Germans and others by now.

@kirilll7806

2 жыл бұрын

Rest in peace east Germanic tribes

@nestingherit7012

2 жыл бұрын

And rest in peace Dalmatian language, that slavs made it extinct.

Very impressive and difficult task to complete! my only nitpick is that it was a bit early to see Polish dissapear in some of Silesia, in the areas north of the oder Polish was still generlaly the majority language until after the thirty years war, and as well as Opole

@Ponanoix

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah, for example Wrocław was still a majority speaking, border-line polish city in 1650, only later did the german-polish line crossed it. But generally speaking, the germanisation of Silesia was pretty slow during Austrian times, only after Prussia, later Germany, seized the territory In 1742, the process became more rapid

@CrazyLeiFeng

2 жыл бұрын

that video is wrong. Polish was spoken as a minority language throughout the whole of Ukraine (with exception of Crimea) and Belarus until extermination of Poles by Soviets in 1937-38. There were majority Polish areas near Minsk and Kiyv until that time. Lvov (Lviv) in Western Ukraine was majority Polish until Soviets expelled Poles in 1945-46. According to the Tsarist census of 1897 6% of Smolensk (Russia) population were Poles.

@lordpolish2727

2 жыл бұрын

@@CrazyLeiFeng Yes, you are right about that too

@andrewshepitko6354

2 жыл бұрын

At first time when I was in Poland and heard polish I had impression to be in middle age because of sounds of polish language. Great language

@Zrck33

2 жыл бұрын

Impressive, very nice...

Slovenian is actually closer to czech and slovak language than other south slavic but because of location on the map and our history under yougoslavia they count us as sout slavic language and slovenians inhabit all of Kärnten and styria in austria. And slovenian fist book is from 10th century and first dictionary was written in 15th century which meand that slovenian existed way beafore than what is showed in this video It is miracle that slovenian language still exist at first slovenians or carantanians were part of samo's kingdom and after that we had our country called carantania we fought wars with avars, franks and bavarians. Eventualy we surrender in year 828 and than we beacame duchy of frankish kingdom until year 900 after that franks give carantania under the bavarians and so slovenian language was forbiden until the end of austro-hungary empire in 1918

@amalgama2000

3 жыл бұрын

Same thing with East Slavic languages. Belarusian and Ukrainian are more similar to Slovak/Sorbian/Czech then to Russian, because they evolved from the common language unlike Russian (from the Old Church Slavonic). But because of the location they all considered to be in one group

@kssrnotsoviet

2 жыл бұрын

@@amalgama2000 Czech? What They are mix of Polish and Russian

@amalgama2000

2 жыл бұрын

@@kssrnotsoviet your expertise in languages and eternities is beyond poor. But it isn't strange if one take your nickname under consideration. All soviets are hard core delusionists

@bartlomiejsosnowski4840

Жыл бұрын

🇵🇱 🇨🇿 🇸🇰 🇸🇮 🔵🔴⚪💪

@pavlesevaljevic4623

Жыл бұрын

They have all in common that they were greatly influenced by germanic language. I speak Slovenian and Serbian. You can kind of tell how old is the language by how it sounds because it coresponds with duration of the opression from other non slavs. I am learning Macedonian and have many Macedonian friends, i can tell you thet there are a lot more "Slovenian" words in Macedonian language than in Serbian, even tho Macedonia is considerd to be the Old Serbia because early Serbian history happened predomenantly on that land. That coresponds with them being concured by Turks tham other parts of Serbia so it renaind more unchanged to this day because it was repressed. Slovenian was also repressed pretty early and for a long time, that is why they sound more similar even tho they are so far apart, plus foreign words they adopted. Next to be concord by otomans were Serbs and then after Serbs croats by austrhungary. You can kind of see the evolution of south slavic language from old south slavic (wersion of Slovenian and Macedonian) to Serbian (ekavica) and then to croatian dialect jekavica which is also spoken in Montenegro which was never concord by anyone (but they identify as Serbs and say they speak Serbian). I should also mention I actually originate from Montenegro from Njeguši (some people may be confused when I say I'm Serbian). The longer the sluth slavs stayed independant the more alive was the language and the faster it changed/evolved. I believe it would be possible to apply that teory to other slavic languages, it doesent necessarly mean they were opressed it cud also mean that they were just under stronger foreign influence. For example Russian kind of sounds like jekavica to me (just that they don't call it that, you know the use of the soft and hard letter). Cech, Slovach, Polish and Lužičko Serbian sound more similar to my ear, more "rough" like german. Love to all Slavic brothers and sisters, protect and cherish our language, tradition and faith. Glory to God in heaven, peace to earth and good will among us.

The video is grossly inaccurate, Slavic speakers of the 6th, 7th, 8th, and 9th centuries should've been the vast majority in all of Southeastern Europe and mainland Greece, barring some isolated footholds of Latinitate and Koine Greek, like Monemvasia, Adrianople, Thessaloniki, and some cities on the Eastern Adriatic coast.

@VuleProductions

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah Byzantine didn't even control that regions. Even Thessaloniki (Solun) had bunch of Slavs there

@nikolaistoyanov1720

Жыл бұрын

The author of the video was born in the south of Bulgaria. This explains all the inaccuracies that concern you.

Slovene diverged from Serbo-Croatian only a century and a half ago? I find that hard to believe, they're quite different. Some of your info must be off.

@masterofnordinbad8914

3 жыл бұрын

Slovenian is actually closer to czech and slovak language than other south slavic but because of location on the map and our history under yougoslavia they count us as sout slavic language And slovenian fist book is from 10th century and first dictionary was written in 15th century It is miracle that slovenian language still exist at first slovenians or carantanians were part of samo's kingdom and after that we had our country called carantania we fought wars with avars, franks and bavarians. Eventualy we surrender in year 828 and than we beacame duchy of frankish kingdom until year 900 after that franks give carantania under the bavarians and so slovenian language was forbiden until the end of austro-hungary empire in 1918

@DelijeSerbia

3 жыл бұрын

map is wrong on so many levels.

@dragonitzgame

2 жыл бұрын

@@masterofnordinbad8914 So why do all linguists put it as a South Slavic language? It has nothing to do with the location.

@masterofnordinbad8914

2 жыл бұрын

@@dragonitzgame idk probabli location and history I know that slovak language and czech language are way closer to alovenian than serbo croatian

@dragonitzgame

2 жыл бұрын

@@masterofnordinbad8914 maybe its like the case of English? It has more Romance vocabulary but its a Germanic language. Anyway, the video is a bit wrong, because in Austria and Hungary Slavs lived for a long time. Perhaps Slovenian is the link between the West Slavic languages and the South Slavic languages, and that is why it resembles both.

1:14 That's... familiar...

@bruhsoundeffect2882

4 жыл бұрын

polish bois

@pavels.6670

4 жыл бұрын

WHEN THE WINGED HUSSARS ARRIVED

@mierokatak322

4 жыл бұрын

@River Piscean To że to mem związany z I RP, a te tereny przypominają dawniej przez nią posiadane - śmieszne czy nieśmieszne to nieważne, to mem

@anotherhumanbeing3923

4 жыл бұрын

China ?

@DanksterPaws

3 жыл бұрын

Whats with the two china replies. Is that the only thing that has that shape? Its not even relevant to the video. The shape looks similar to Polish-Lithuania or just Poland in WW2. Not the china china

Parabéns , um excelente trabalho , principalmente na tentativa de sincronização, sou brasileiro de origem eslava (polonesa), lendo os comentários você pode perceber que não consegue agradar a "gregos e troianos" , fique tranquilo foi um ótimo trabalho (nesse exercício temos que levar em conta o nacionalismo e o antagonismo étnico, muita besteira se produz para defender as ideias megalomaníacas ), do ponto de vista cientifico os linguistas e geneticistas estão contribuindo para preencher as lacunas dos arqueólogos, antropólogos e historiadores !

@MarcosVinicius-dh6fk

2 жыл бұрын

eu sou decendente de venezianos, valeu por ajudar a defender veneza contra os turcos 😎👍

@paxetamor8276

2 жыл бұрын

@@MarcosVinicius-dh6fk Are you joking? in reality it is the Republic of the Serenissima that prevented the Ottomans from invading part of Montenegro, part of Croatia and part of Slovenia. keep in mind that the Venetians had already colonized some Turkish and Greek territories, up to Malta. Just to be clearer .... 😉

@Ponanoix

Жыл бұрын

Hello Brazilian of polish descent. I live in Poland and am of polish descent, similarly

Serbo-Croatian counted as one? As it always should have been ❤

@craftah

Жыл бұрын

literally the same languages they just seperate because of politics

@pavlesevaljevic4623

Жыл бұрын

It is just a dialect no need for separation.

@kungszigfrids1482

Жыл бұрын

@@pavlesevaljevic4623 If serbocroatian is to be split in 2 based on dialects you would get serbocroatian and dalmatian.

@gordonpi8674

11 ай бұрын

Yes, and it will be that way, it will always be the same language with a few accents.

@skin4700

10 ай бұрын

People will say its the same language but that name implies serbian dominance and thats why croats dont like it. Even thoe I can understand more of serbian than most of the island dialects of croatia. Its sad that we are not united but the time for that was 1200 years ago, we cannot be the same even thoe we are brothers.

fun fact - there is a region with pomeranian speakers in Brazil

In the mid-9th century, Lower Pannonia was inhabited by a Slavic majority. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lower_Pannonia_(9th_century)

@unikitty5131

4 жыл бұрын

That is why Hungarians and Poles are best friends.

@mcarco118

3 жыл бұрын

I've read somewhere that "panonian Slavs" were living there until the year 1500.

@881terror

2 жыл бұрын

@@mcarco118 panonian Slavs + moravians + Slovaks are in one language family = Slovieni

If anyone is wondering why the region of Ruthenia (modern day Belarus and Ukraine) is also striped with West Slavic Polish Language in the mid 1500's, it is because of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth union from 1550 to roughly 1780, during which POLISH was the lingua franca of the commonwealth, and all aristocrats in Belarus and Ukraine spoke Polish (because the territiories of Ruthenia were all part of the Polish-Lithuanian commonwealth union). Only the working-class in Belarus and Ukraine spoke Ruthenian (Ruthenian= ancestor of modern day Belarussian and Ukrainian language) at that time. That's why Belarussian and Ukrainian (despite being EAST SLAVIC in origin), have HUGE West Slavic Polish language influences too, because of the Polish loanwords during the commonwealth era which seeped into Ruthenian language at the time. that's why Belarussian and Ukrainian is much easier to understand for a Pole than Russian for example. (Russian has much less Polish vocabulary language influences than either Ukrainian or Belarussian).

There is no certainty among historians about the extent of the Slavic languages before 400 CE. Pannonia before the invasion of the Magyars was also Slavic-speaking, although the Avars ruled there.

@VuleProductions

2 жыл бұрын

Slavs were migrating to Byzantine territory trough Avar territory

@bobo-lu2ef

2 жыл бұрын

That was only the case for the Pannonian land East of the Danube. Slavs were a significant minority in the rest of Pannonia.

@basedchad6035

2 жыл бұрын

@@VuleProductions invading but yeah

@dragonitzgame

Жыл бұрын

​@@basedchad6035 Migration is not the same as invation

@basedchad6035

Жыл бұрын

@@dragonitzgame you dont think there were people before? You think they were happy their land got taken? Bruv dont be so naive. Its been a while. No reason to lie about that history

Only we Serbs and our enemies Croats keep common language today until 2 thousand years!

@CapitanScimitar555

3 жыл бұрын

Why enemy?

@undefeated_romantic1692

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah, everything is like in the respectable family: it's a family and everyone hates each other, lol.

@bletrick3352

2 жыл бұрын

@loder Man Yes and no. It’s definitely not only about religion even if it is the defining factor

@knin8917

2 жыл бұрын

@@bletrick3352 Oh yes bolive me it's only because of religion.

@VuleProductions

2 жыл бұрын

@@CapitanScimitar555 He probably is a fake Serb or chetnik from Yugoslav wars

Beautiful history! Well done. But one thing I don't understand. Why Czech and Slovak separated in your map so late? As far as I know (and I am Czech), written Czech was first documented at the begining of 13th century and at the turn of 14th and 15th century, it gradually established as chancery language in Kingdom of Bohemia, Margriavite of Moravia nad Upper Silesian duchies. Approximately at the turn of 15th and 16th century, Czech also established as written language in Upper Hungary (i. e. what is today Slovakia), but in specific, definitely slovakized form, which means, that common spoken language in what is today Slovakia was in that time markedly different from spoken language in Bohemia and Moravia. It does mean, that also Slovak was at that time established as separate language. Not yet written, but definitely spoken. At the turn of 18th and 19th century, Czech literary language underwent extensive modernization (so called Czech national revival, which was basically reaction to preceding prolonged decline of the language), whilst Slovaks developed roughly at the same time genuine Slovak literary language (instead of slovakized Czech). But it definitelly doesn't mean that before 19th century were no separate Czech and Slovak languages. Please, don't take it as criticism. Your histories are awsome and I greatly admire you. It was just my minor factual note.

@rdtgr8

4 жыл бұрын

I agree. Maybe I'm not an expert in Slovak history, but it's obvious that Slovak is significantly closer to Ukrainian and Serbo-Croatian languages and is quite understandable to speakers of them. From genetic point of view Slovaks are not so hard R1a-M458-dominated as Czechs, which makes them somewhat closer to R1a-Z280-CTS-dominated South-West and East Slavs. And simultaneously unlike Czechs and Poles they have quite much (16%) I2a, which is close to Slovene (22%) and Ukrainian (20.5%) levels, despite it's still much less than Serbo-Croates have (31-54%), however last exaggerated value may be explained via Founder effect work. So in total it's likely that Slovak from beginning was a mix of West Slavic (Czech) and Carpathian (Ukrainian, Serbo-Croatian, Slovene) dialects.

@mcarco118

3 жыл бұрын

@@rdtgr8 I think that I know the reason why you see slovak language as some kind of mix of western and carpathian slavic language. In my humble opinion it's because in 7-9th century in todays west and middle Slovakia was slavic tribe of Nitravians (ancestors of Slovaks) and on the east there were White Croats. One part of them later moved on Balkan and second stayed and most likely were assimilated. So mix of western Nitravians and eastern White Croats could caused that nowadays slovak language can be understandable to many other Slavic nations.

@pwnmeisterage

3 жыл бұрын

I'm guessing the "inaccuracies" are based on different quantity and quality of surviving historical records - things may suddenly appear different before and after gaps in the data instead of blurring through transition. Language drift and genetic drift are both constant yet gradual ... until contact with an outside population quickly imposes dramatic changes.

@pavlesevaljevic4623

Жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/anaky9qBYJueqMo.html

@Vero_la_fea

9 ай бұрын

According to modern linguistics Czech and Slovak are the same language even today

I've noticed that this has the latest starting date compared to other videos of Indo-European brances (unless I missed one with a later date). Does this mean that Slavic is the youngest Indo-European branch?

@CostasMelas

Жыл бұрын

Previously, it was part of the Balto-Slavic group

Finally! A video visually describing the history of the Slavic languages has emerged! Bring fourth our Slava!🇵🇱🇨🇿🇸🇰🇷🇺🇺🇦🇧🇾🇷🇸🇭🇷🇸🇮🇲🇪🇧🇦🇧🇬🇲🇰

@Oleksij_Shelest

4 жыл бұрын

No, this video do not come even close to actual describe real history of Slavic languages spreading.

@user-xz4ck8zs2u

4 жыл бұрын

bruh 😬

@gabrielzak.7942

4 жыл бұрын

@@nnannbbh that's a point

@user-uk1bi4fp4z

4 жыл бұрын

@@nnannbbh Kosovo

@stefanmirkovic6681

4 жыл бұрын

Wtf Kosovo? Kosovo je Srbija🇷🇸

Why did u upload again?

@CostasMelas

4 жыл бұрын

There were some issues I noticed after uploading and I should to fix them.

@dariomoreno9267

4 жыл бұрын

@@CostasMelas k then. Good video as always :)

There is also a village on Sjælland (Denmark) called Kramnitse (or Kramnitze), wich was initially settled by slavs.

@michaelcalle2981

11 ай бұрын

Slavs never reached Denmark at all and there's no evidence to proof it, the name kramnitise (Kramnitize) may not actually be of wendish origin but if its of slavic origin then it's proberly named because of Germans who were occupying and influencing some of Denmark with village names since Germany has lots of slavic names who then adapted it as their own. Slavs only reached to schielwig near anglia which is northern Germany (close to border of Denmark)

@michaelcalle2981

5 ай бұрын

@@Judah132The slavs only traded with the Vikings during those ages but they NEVER ever settled in coastal areas of Denmark and Norway since they were ongoing conflicts between them and they never wanted wars between each other so they did only trade. Those are fully homogenous Germanic nations.

@michaelcalle2981

5 ай бұрын

@@Judah132Trade doesn’t also always mean intermingling with each other but by that logic it means eastern Slavs have Turkic and Mongolian ancestry because they raided them and did mass trade.

@user-jo2ps6el9i

3 ай бұрын

​@@michaelcalle2981 Ukrainians and Southern Slavs sure have turkish influence, they are darker than other slavs. And tatars sure had common progeny with eastern slavs, because there are populations of tatars who have blue eyes, blonde hair and european eye shape, especially in Kazan city

Great information! Thank you

This is the map of belarussian language in 1903 : en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yefim_Karsky#/media/File%3ABelarusians_1903.jpg

@alexey056

4 жыл бұрын

В России любят белорусский язык и Беларусь, и её народ. Все перемещены, поэтому о чётких границах говорить трудно. Не думаю, что в Смоленске как то по другому поймут белорусский язык, чем в других регионах России.

@alexander6108

4 жыл бұрын

This is not the belarussian map language. This is the the map of dialects. They just spoke russian with different dialect.

@janeza382

4 жыл бұрын

Ruthenian?

Good job! The pre-1944 eastern border of Finland is incorrect though, and Hungarian was the prevailing language in the south of modern Slovakia until WWII too

@881terror

2 жыл бұрын

and where is Panonian Slavs and principality of Balaton?

@juniorcrusher2245

2 жыл бұрын

He shows it as mixed

@881terror

2 жыл бұрын

@@juniorcrusher2245 but they was not mixed. They was Slavic

If the proto-slavs knew how their offsprings would fight and hate each other would they decide to split up?

@kirilll7806

2 жыл бұрын

Nope

@juniorcrusher2245

2 жыл бұрын

Yes

@guppy719

2 жыл бұрын

There wasn't a choice, areas back then were much more isolated from each other without modern technology

what are your sources for all these videos? they’re good but how can we know this is all true?

@russianwithrussian

3 жыл бұрын

No one can know it for sure. :)

@881terror

2 жыл бұрын

@@russianwithrussian History is written by winners. Today winners are anglosaxons but not for long chinenes incoming

"Let foreigners, out of ignorance or negligence, take little care of them, but it is unforgivable for us to forget the Bulgarians from whose hands we received baptism, who have taught us to write, to read, in whose vernacular is our worship, in whose language for the most part we wrote almost to the time of Lomonosov, whose cradle is connected by inseparable knots with the cradle of the Russian people and so on. " Yuri Venelin on Bulgarian history in 1829 --- In his article Protection of the Old Bulgarian Language (1990) Prof. Dr. Otto Kronsteiner from Austria writes: “The Old Bulgarian language has become the cultural language of all Orthodox Slavs. It was the first state literary language in Medieval Europe long before the emergence of European literary languages ​​- German, French, Italian, English, Russian "and Serbian inclusive, of course! --- "When Greek Christianity was officially accepted in Russia at the end of the 10th century, its distributors in Russia were mainly Bulgarian clergy. In this way, the Bulgarian language became the basis of the Russian Church and Russian literary language. " M. Fassmer, quoted by M. Popov, The Bulgarian People between the European Races and Peoples, Sofia, Court Printing House, 1938; “The influence of the Bulgarian language was felt extremely strongly by the Russians and Serbs until the 18th century, this influence weakened only in the 19th century, when vernacular elements entered the literature of these two peoples and replaced the influence of the old church influences. These influences were especially strong because the Russian Church Slavonic language also shows too much Bulgarian, and partly directly Eastern Bulgarian elements. М. Фасмер, Die Bulgarische Literatur im Zeitalter des Zaren Simeon und ihre Bedeutung für die Orhodoxe Slawenwelt, Berlin, 1929 --- "The orthography of our (ie Russian, b.a.) manuscripts from the middle of the XV century is a reflection of the orthography of the South Slavic (more precisely of the Middle Bulgarian) manuscripts. It is clear that between the middle of the XIV and the middle of the XV century, the Russian script came under the very strong influence of the South Slavic script and ultimately submitted to this influence. " Alexey Sobolevsky --- "Bulgaria in the 15th century as a whole is this huge center through which the Byzantine influence in Serbia and Russia passes, a center through which this influence gets its Slavic color, strengthened in the numerous translations, which reflect the written reform of Patriarch Euthymius." Dmitry Likhachev

@misterpikes7600

2 жыл бұрын

What does that mena ? That Russians used the Kyrilic alphabet after Bulgarians ?

@crimsonfarts6856

2 жыл бұрын

@@misterpikes7600 borrowed the alphabet as well as Christianity from Bulgarians

@misterpikes7600

2 жыл бұрын

@@crimsonfarts6856 Since both came to you from the Romans same could be said about you . No point taking pride from something you didnt create and someone also uses

@crimsonfarts6856

2 жыл бұрын

@@misterpikes7600 Our alphabet was invented by greeco-born bulgarians and we got our religion from the Byzantiums

@misterpikes7600

2 жыл бұрын

@@crimsonfarts6856 did i say something wrong ? dont think so

The term Serbo-Croatian has only been around since 1824 and it was coined by a German dictionarist and folklorist Jacob Grimm, the term completely undermines the Bosnian and Montenegrin influence and development of this branch of Slavic, while many say that this language has the clearest form/accent in Bosnia and Herzegovina.

4:31 This is particularly the one I like the most

3:42 it is interesting that Liutprad of Cremona writes that in the northern parts of Europe there live a people who in appearance are called Ρουσιος (Rusios / Reds), and in their place of residence they are called normans (northerners), but normans are Scandinavians, not Slavic.

@TheOlgaSasha

4 жыл бұрын

It is not a new fact. Here, in Ukraine, we all learnt even at school that Rus or Ruth were the Normannic people. The Byzantian chronicles of 10-11 centuris call more than 50 names of "folk of Rus" from Kiev (Koenugard), and they all were Scandinavians...Actually, Kievan Rus was a polyethnic medieval state ruled by Normanns and their main dynasty of Rurikids till the Mongolian invasion to Kievan Rus.

@naelerasmans322

4 жыл бұрын

@@TheOlgaSasha As I remember, Rurikids was the main dynasty till the 16 century and then tzars became to Romanovs.

@user-td6mu6uu2h

3 жыл бұрын

@@naelerasmans322 the Romanovs ruled until the 18th century. then the German dynasty ruled, although they called themselves novels.

@881terror

2 жыл бұрын

When was maded DNA test on norwegian and Icelandic people there was founded high percentage of east european DNA R1A around 20-30%. And did you see funeral speech of Swedish king Charles XI? Thats mixture of Polish and Russian not Swedish

@mihanich

2 жыл бұрын

@@881terror at that time there were Russian speaking areas ruled by Sweden east of the Baltic sea (Neva estuary, Yam-Koporye, Karelia etc). And the speech was translated to Russian using Latin alphabet for Russian speaking subjects of the crown. It was also translated to Finnish and other languages. I think knowing about that document and not knowing that swedes actually ruled over some Russians at that time is kind of cringeworthy.

Make a video on Indo-Aryan languages next plz

@CostasMelas

4 жыл бұрын

I'll try to make it in the future

@AD-yq8rl

4 жыл бұрын

There’s already bunch of videos about that.I think he should make exotic videos that are about the Asia and Africa.

@user-ok9dc5qt8d

Жыл бұрын

Russian : BRAT HINDI : BARAT

I thought it'd be started from Proto-Balto-Slavic

@881terror

2 жыл бұрын

yeah why he dont give that years before 50 A.D.?

@grandetristesse3370

2 жыл бұрын

It all started from russia and Ukraine

@881terror

2 жыл бұрын

@@grandetristesse3370 yeah from Ural to Caucasus and Dnieper river.

Could you sinhronize all your video on one map?

@zamanium7517

2 жыл бұрын

И без красных

seeing the comments of this video kinda weird -Latin language speakers are friendly to each other -German-speaking speakers are friendly to each other -Slavic language speakers seem hostile to each other

@marchesadigroenlandia3487

3 жыл бұрын

@Dragan L This video doesn’t even consider Germanic or Romance speaking people, it doesn’t depict them neither in an hostile or a friendly way, I dunno why you’re so triggered and calling conspiracy on a video about Slavic languages because they didn’t show the spreading of languages that aren’t part of the family.

@kgbgb3663

Жыл бұрын

It's taken centuries of hard work by Latin-speakers and Germanic speakers to get it that way.

Shocking to see Germany speaking Slavic languages before 1000

Slavic Macedonian came into existence only in 1944. It is Bulgarian language as a base written on a Serbian typewriter with selective replacement of words, letters, imported elements just to make it sound distinct from Bulgarian.

@881terror

2 жыл бұрын

Alexander of Macedon: i am joke to you?

@crimsonfarts6856

2 жыл бұрын

@@881terror Alexander is greek

@mareksagrak9527

2 жыл бұрын

@@881terror Do not mistake the ancient Macedonian language (which was a close relative of ancient Greek and dissapeared slowly together with hellenisation of original Macedonians) with the modern, Slavic Macedonian language. They have absolutely nothing in common beside the name, even the teritorries they were spoken are mainly different. -_-

Seeing the sorbs slowly disappear 😔

@Slawny_luziski_Wojak

Жыл бұрын

My smy a hišće tu budźemy 💖🔵🔴⚪💖

@user-kc5sv7du4p

Жыл бұрын

@@Slawny_luziski_Wojak I am Sorbian myself

@user-kc5sv7du4p

Жыл бұрын

@@Slawny_luziski_Wojak I support Lusatian Independence and the slavicization of the German race. Germans are already 1/3 slavic.

@haulawcoast

Жыл бұрын

@@user-kc5sv7du4p wtf nazi

Unfortunately, this map is also wrong. There are no traces of Albanians in Kosovo and Metohija before the 17th century. On this map it is shown as if there were no Serbs there at all

ok but question remains - where did the slavs come from?

The history of the Slavs before their baptism began is a mystery, shrouded in darkness, and the history of the emergence of the Slavic language and its division into Polish, Russian, Ukrainian, Czech and others is generally unknown.The author you guess on the coffee grounds.

@ivydark9741

4 ай бұрын

We have a clear Indian influence in some words and ornaments, yet the mythology is similar to Scandi.

R.I.P Polabians (and Panonian Slavs, Dacian Slavs, Greek Slavs and Carantanians) lost slavic cousins [*]

@kosa9662

Жыл бұрын

Carantanians are still alive, they call themselfs Slovenes

@robertab929

6 ай бұрын

@@kosa9662 But the Slovenian range now is smaller than it was earlier.

1:26 Austria was all slavic

@ShallIMove

3 жыл бұрын

No, it's Hungary.

@aniinnrchoque1861

3 жыл бұрын

Austria as Regio Noricum just like Helvetica was Celtic.

@digdug1431

3 жыл бұрын

@@aniinnrchoque1861 Sorry, the Celts were already Latinized and absent from Inner Austria by this date.

@aniinnrchoque1861

3 жыл бұрын

@@digdug1431 I mean yeah in the early 7th century there were at most only gallo-romance remnants left as the Slavs pushed in around that time

@iljailit5438

3 жыл бұрын

Depends in which time but approx. in 7th century, the most western Slavic settlements were roughly on the line Linz - Lienz.

Hm, it means that Ukrainian and Russian are not the same, right? Yeah, they were East - Slavic but according to the map Russian appeared earlier and not from Ruthenian as Ukrainian language. Correct me if I'm wrong.

@user-im1rk3gm8z

2 жыл бұрын

At a time when nations did not yet exist, the proto-Ukrainian and proto-Russian peoples were separated by a natural barrier - a large forest with swamps, so due to poor communication, their languages were created separately.

@sert87

Жыл бұрын

What language appeared earlier is a silly question. Languages change over time and Russian that appears on this map in 1500s wasn't the same as it is today. All modern East Slavic languages are equally related to East Slavic language. Ukrainian / Russian / Belorussian split has to do with political divisions of Russia, Poland and Lithuania. After the Mongol invasion many Russian principalities in the south and west became part of the Grand duchy of Lithuania (split into Russian and Ruthenian). Galicia (modern western Ukraine) became part of Poland. Later Lithuania entered a personal union with Poland and the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth was born. Within that commonwealth modern Ukrainian territories of Lithuania were passed to the Kingdom of Poland (split of Ruthenian into Ukrainian and Belorussian). All these changes are very gradual and complicated however and the map doesn't really reflect it. It's very basic / schematic. The people speaking the Ruthenian language would probably just tell you that they are speaking Russian. And people speaking East Slavic would tell you they're speaking Slavic or Russian. All these would be different from modern Russian of course. The names on the map are just historiographic terms.

@nikitospilesos3869

Жыл бұрын

@@sert87 Okay thanks for your essay but I didn't ask what language appeared earlier.

@user-ok9dc5qt8d

Жыл бұрын

Ruthenia-c'est la Russie en langue Latine !!!!!!

@yutolifo3811

Жыл бұрын

@@user-ok9dc5qt8d Да, ты прав, что Рутенией звали Русь, но тут имелось ввиду русинский язык (Ruthenian language). Эх, жаль, что мы не узнаем, на каком языке говорили простые люди в Киевской Руси, ведь писали на церковном, который является искусственным и не был похож на разговорный.

Turkic people: conquering ancient Indo-European (Scythian lands) Slavs: *And i took this personally*

@VuleProductions

2 жыл бұрын

They came to modern day Austria lel

One correction old Church Slavonic was the official language (old Bulgarian) of the Bulgarian Tsardom.

I wonder if you can do Arabic varieties

ERROR: 1945-2022 - 200'000 Polish speaking citizens in western Ukraine. The red lines shouldn't have been erased in that area.

@petarprasevic

5 ай бұрын

Majority polish people leaved western Ukraine after WWII. Now in western Byelorussia there are places with polish speaking population, but in western Ukraine (eastern Galicia)- no.

@ivydark9741

4 ай бұрын

​@@petarprasevicthey probably ran away from their after being massacred by Ukrainians in Volhynia.

@petarprasevic

4 ай бұрын

According census 2001, in Ukraine (all) was 144,100 ethnic Poles. But they are not all Polish speakers.

@petarprasevic

4 ай бұрын

@@ivydark9741 during that time all Poland was occupied by Nazi. Where they ran to?

@user-gj4wj6ws3g

4 ай бұрын

Error: 1945-2022 - 150'000 Ukrainian speakers citizens in “Recovered Territories”. The light blue lines shouldn't have been erased in that area. Also, according to the 2001 Ukrainian census, there were only 19 195 persons in Ukraine who called Polish their mother tongue, which is even smaller than the number of people in Poland for whom the Ukrainian language was native at the time. Even the genocidal actions of the Polish government didn't manage to change that.

I find it unlikely that slovenian is less than 200 years old. Can anyone give me the details?

@josiprakonca2185

Күн бұрын

Primož Trubar was the author of the first printed book in Slovene language. He was born in 1508.

@baltulielkungsgunarsmiezis9714

Күн бұрын

@@josiprakonca2185 Not thats much more reasonable.

Interesting that Proto-Slavic arose much later than the Germanic language family. How much interaction did the Slavic languages have with East Germanic / Gothic?

@LordDamianus

3 жыл бұрын

It's a German and Anglo-Saxon propaganda that Slavic languages are younger than Germanic. Slavic resemble PIE much more than Germanic.

@nadirjofas3140

3 жыл бұрын

@@LordDamianus nah

@881terror

2 жыл бұрын

Before Slavic was Balto-Slavic and it is way older than your german. German was first recorded in 100BC but Balto-Slavic 1500BC.

@dragonitzgame

Жыл бұрын

​@@LordDamianusThats exactly why Slavic laguages are youger, they diverged much later from proto-indo-european than the Germanic Languages by example.

@robertab929

6 ай бұрын

@@dragonitzgame Nope. Proto-Slavic and Proto-Baltic languages diverged from Balto-Slavic language which existed 3500 years ago. Balto-Slavic language diverged probably from Satem Indo-European group which gave rise also to Indian and Iranian languages. ['satem' - 'one hundred' in Avestan language] Celtic, Italic (and Romance), Germanic, Greek diverged from Centrum Indo-European group. ['centrum' - 'one hundred' in Latin]

Slavs as fast as Rome falls: LET'S DO THIS

You can clearly see that they wont call it bulgarian its south esat slavic, south slavic, old curch slavonic or something. And now see the hate in my coments ;¬)

@AlexAhmedov

3 жыл бұрын

Всички са Български Old church slavonic bulgarian

@blagoevski336

8 ай бұрын

​@@AlexAhmedovnope

Now Berlin but in the past Kopanica - slavic village.

@unikitty5131

4 жыл бұрын

Berlin is correct in Slavic language, it is a Slavic town name.

@alexander6108

4 жыл бұрын

Copnic was a Village. It was not Berlin. Brlo was the word for Berlin.

@noaoah3662

3 жыл бұрын

That’s quite interesting, there is a neighborhood in Berlin called Köpenick. Im assuming it was a village which was integrated into Berlin, but Berlin had its own name like other comments have said

@dnrnfnfcmdndnddj2968

3 жыл бұрын

Yes and Brandenburg was called Branibor. In serbia we still have some village names like kopanica and branibor. We serbs came from that region and there are still lusatian serbs living there. They speak sorbian

@INecr0

3 жыл бұрын

- The name Berlin has its roots in the language of West Slavic inhabitants of the area of today's Berlin, and may be related to the Old Polabian stem berl-/birl- ("swamp"). - Dresden's name etymologically derives from Old Sorbian Drežďany, meaning people of the forest.

Why does polish influence over Ruthenian suddenly end before 1700? Wasn't the PLC still around then?

@bloodkelp

Жыл бұрын

I guess its because cossacks rebelled so polacks had to soften their grip on them

@kosa9662

11 ай бұрын

@@bloodkelp PLC was too decentralised to impose languange on others.

You have Austronesian Language history???

I seem The areal of "vyatishs" is not included to "East-Slavic" in this map.

@TheStraightEdger

3 жыл бұрын

East slavs spoke one language - Old Russian or Old East Slavic. There were almost no differences in east slavic dialects, except Old Novgorod.

@Andreeeeeerrr

3 жыл бұрын

Well, as I know Vyatishs isn't Slavic languages, it's Finno-ugric. But people what spoke at this language was very integrated in society of Kievan Rus'

@TheBobVova

3 жыл бұрын

@@Andreeeeeerrr Vyatishs is Slavic tribe.

@mihanich

3 жыл бұрын

@@Andreeeeeerrr does вятичи sound to you like a finno-ugric tribe?

@mihanich

3 жыл бұрын

It's included, you can see the volga-oka basin turning blue during the 10th century. That's roughly where vyatiches lived. The problem is that their settlements start to appear there in 7th century, not 10th like shown here

We do not speak Church Slavonic in Ukraine, it is only used in some Orthodox churches.

@Acid_doughnut

4 жыл бұрын

Davyd Rusyn Думаю, що мається на увазі, що церковнослов´янський мав вплив на русинський та український пізніше. Так само, як і польська. Ну, а наразі київський ізвод церковнослов´янскої є офіційною мовою церкви.

@81pieda

4 жыл бұрын

Hence why it's shaded on the map and not in "full color"

@naelerasmans322

4 жыл бұрын

What language do you use in church? Ukrainian? Or Latin? As I remember, you have a mix of orthodox and roman catholicism, do you?

@user-ks3zz1wb4g

4 жыл бұрын

@@naelerasmans322 Ukrainian-speaking churches use Ukrainian without OCS (Old Church...) words, while Russian/ and Russian-speaking churches in Ukraine use modern Russian+OCS

@alexey056

4 жыл бұрын

Если у тебя хороший словарный запас, то любой славяноязычный человек может прочитать текст на церковнославянском, он будет понятен всем славянам без исключения, это как эсперанто среди славян своего времени.

Super video :).

Most of kazahstan, all of dagestan, chechnya, all of tatarstan are speaking russian. A lot of people in Georgia, Armenia, all of Belarus. Around 70% of ukraine until 2022 spoke russian too. This map is more like about nations, than languages, but for some reason its called 'languages map'

@dav2ry7

4 ай бұрын

This is about native speakers, not diaspora. Then the map would be completely different. Nobody speaks Russian at home in Dagestan, while for Ukraine it would be around 40% (incl. southern and eastern regions), if these regions aren't included, around 15%. But you can obviously see the that the Russian language is in southern and eastern Ukraine on the map, so where's the problem?

@levershredder

4 ай бұрын

​​@@dav2ry7>15% in all of ukraine excluding south and east i think that even after 2022 this is barely the case. Before it anything eastern than Zhytomir was 80% russian. >what is the problem Belarus, kazakhstan, tatarstan, are not a 'diaspora', but 100% native speakers. Excl. south kazakhstan. So, they should be painted as full russian along with ukraine up to rovno-zhytomir line until 2022.

@dav2ry7

4 ай бұрын

@@levershredder Funny, because I live near Vinnytsia, also close to Zhytomyr. 😄 I can't hear any Russian here, only if you go to the city of Vinnytsia, you can hear some Russian, but it's usually mixed with Ukrainian + there are many people from Eastern Ukraine. I also have family in the Cherkasy region, I couldn't hear any Russian there. But obviously, when I was in Kharkiv, everyone spoke Russian there. So southeastern Ukraine definitely speaks Russian, but the rest of Ukraine, not really. I'd say Hungarian or Romanian are more common, but where did you find such data? 🤔

@ivydark9741

4 ай бұрын

​@@dav2ry7Kiev spoke mostly Russian till 2022. )

@dav2ry7

4 ай бұрын

@@ivydark9741 Kyiv yes, but not the region.

Muito bom. Muito legal. Bem entendido através deste mapa ver expansão do língua eslava. Parabéns.

Very well done. It's interesting that Crimea and southern Ukraine were not Slavic until 1770 therish. What were they before? Turkic I am guessing? Or something else?

@thenewparallel

4 жыл бұрын

Yeah, Crimea was Turkic

@thenewparallel

4 жыл бұрын

The southern Ukraine was almost deserted, it was called Dikoe Pole (Wild Field)

@abloodorange5233

4 жыл бұрын

Okay cool

@TheOlgaSasha

4 жыл бұрын

Did you heard something about Crimean Goths?

@JurzGarz

3 жыл бұрын

They spoke Crimean Tatar, a Turkic language.

The split of south-west slavic languages into the ancestors of Slovene and Serbo-Croatian was around year 800 ad. And Austria was populated by Slavic people during this time too, before it was colonized by the Bavarians. It's a neat looking video, but I am willing to bet that it got a lot of other things wrong in the regions with which I am less familiar. Ultimately, it might prove useful to some Americans. But for everyone else, it is just a waste of 5 minutes.

@TheOlgaSasha

3 жыл бұрын

But we have to thank him as he is not Slav. At least he tried to show their scholars opinion. While our Slavic "scientists" (I do not talk about all of them) didn't any analogic video for Americans and Western Europeans...

@fascistmonke

2 жыл бұрын

no, there was no split.

@881terror

2 жыл бұрын

@@TheOlgaSasha Slavic official scientists (I do not talk about all of them) just copy and paste everything about history from german guy Friedrich Maurer who making german propaganda in 1942. That why our history is lie. Germans never write true about Slavic people and in 1942 = no chance.

@adnankamen6470

Жыл бұрын

The term Serbo-Croatian has only been around 1824 and it was termed by a German dictionarist and folklorist Jacob Grimm, imagine how different it would have sounded 1000 years prior.. probably almost unintelligibly different.. Therefore your recommendation is nonsensical and as a Bosnian pisses me off. not only does the term completely undermine the Bosnian and Montenegrin influence and development of this branch of Slavic, you want to further erase another 800 years of our connection with our language.. BKS or BKMS is a much fairer term to define this branch of the Slavic language..

@robertab929

6 ай бұрын

Yeah, video has plenty of errors. Originally, they Slavs were forming one group since 6. and 7. century with no dialectal differences. Split between West and South Slavs was around 800 AD. Czech and Slovak were originally developing in South Slavic group with Karyntian/Slovenian/Serbo-Croatian. The reason for Czech/Slovak/Serbo-Croatian unity was probably a series of common countries (Samo's country, Great Moravia). Bavarian and Frankish efforts to take over today Austria (Austria east of today Salzburg) and establishment of Margraviate of Austria, as well as arrival of Magyars around year 900 caused separation Czechs/Slovaks with the rest of South Slavs. After separation of South Slavic group by Magyars, Czech/Slovak and Lechitic group created a more uniform group due to interaction.

I wonder sometimes, what prevented the Slavic languages from completely absorbing the ancestors of the Lithuanians, Latvians, and Estonians.

@eksiarvamus

3 жыл бұрын

Estonians are rather separated from Russians by lake Peipus-Pskov and the Narva River.

@cianakril

3 жыл бұрын

There's nothing to wonder. Mongols ransacking Slavic lands allowed Lithuanians to take upper hand for several hundred years and actually start assimilating Slavs into Lithuanian (this is how Belarusian and on a smaller degree Ukrainian were created), while Tectonic Knights covered the Estonians and Latvians (while complitely assimilating their Prussian and Latgalian relatives into Germans). Later the Polish-Russian wars stopped both from taking over Lithuania for significant times while Swedish-Russian wars did the same for the rest, those neither could finish assimilation.

@cianakril

3 жыл бұрын

@George Nathanael Slavs are settled all the way to the Pacific Ocean, and neither the forest nor the taiga helped natives all across Northern Eurasia from being assimilated into Russians. Neither it helped the Chuds, the Estonians living in Novgorod domains. The real reason, this 3 countries were tossed around back and forth between the bigger neighbors which hinders the assimilation and sparks out local nationalism which didn't help the further assimilation either.

@cianakril

3 жыл бұрын

@George Nathanael that's precisely what I was talking about just a post above, you just repeated my own words while disagreeing with me somehow🤦🏻‍♂️ Tectonic Knights and Swedes prevented this countries from becoming Slavic, but Russian Empire taking this countries from Sweden and Tectonic Knights prevented them from becoming Swedish or German like it did happened with Prussians who are none left. The collapse of the Russian Empire and then Soviet Union prevented them from becoming Russian, either. Would Tectonic order or Soviet Union lasted for 100 years more, this countries would be assimilated in either of cultures.

@aniinnrchoque1861

3 жыл бұрын

Lithuanian was in fact at the brink of extinction due to the Commonwealth. They barely managed to save the Language after the dissolution with the aide of the Königsberg archives and reconstructed Lithuanian with a slightly prus twist. The reintroduction was rather unique and similar characteristic to the revival of Irish. Unfortunately it also coincided with the demise of Livonian tho that mainly concerned Latvia and not Lithuania.

How do we know slavs lived west of the Vistula before the post-roman migrations?

@CostasMelas

4 жыл бұрын

Some scholars connects Przeworsk culture with Slavs. Also the Vistula Veneti of the Romans connects with the Slavs. It is believed that they lived around Vistula before the German expansion in this area

@robrobski9445

4 жыл бұрын

Vistula used to be called vandala

@ErZu_

4 жыл бұрын

@@CostasMelas fun fact, the name of Baltic sea is from slavic word Balto. And what about ,,łużycka,, (sorbian) culture? 1800bc. It is slavic or germanic?

@wojciechbieszk1074

4 жыл бұрын

@BartoszTV teza o rzekomych ilirowenetach jest zupełnie absurdalna. W czasach kultury łużyckiej nie było jeszcze ani germanów ani celtów ani słowian ani tym bardziej półmitycznych ilirów. Ludzie ci mówili najprawdopodobniej północnozachodnim dialektem języka praindoeuropejskiego

@duwang8499

3 жыл бұрын

@@ErZu_ We don't know yet where the name for the Baltic sea came. It could have been Germanic, Latin or Balto-Slavic. What the Lusatian culture spoke is unknown. Most probably some sort of Indo-European language.

Great work - small correction: Pomeranian should be noted as Kashubian. Source: a Kashubian.

@CostasMelas

3 жыл бұрын

Thank you

@juniorcrusher2245

2 жыл бұрын

It's a dialect

@SornGeorge

2 жыл бұрын

@@juniorcrusher2245 your point is?

@juniorcrusher2245

2 жыл бұрын

@@SornGeorge the videos talking about languages. Kashubian is not a language

@SornGeorge

2 жыл бұрын

@@juniorcrusher2245 so you take issue with Pomeranian being depicted in the video or with me noting this is Kashubian? Also, what makes you feel you need to let the world know about your opinions? Are you a linguist or a Kashubian?

Do one on austronesian

Very useful. Thank you. I always wondered how s Country so close to Italy as Slovenia has a so different lenguauge from neolatin

@CostasMelas

2 жыл бұрын

Thank you

Is pomeranian kaszubian now?

@CostasMelas

4 жыл бұрын

Yes, but earlier it included also the Slovincian

@wojciechbieszk1074

4 жыл бұрын

@@CostasMelas in fact slovincian is nothing but one of kashubian dialects. Present day northern dialect is more similar to slovincian than to present day southern dialect

Russian is shown rather arbitrarily on Estonia and Latvia in the 18th and 19th century and the modern Russian minority in Estonia isn't concentrated on the eastern border of the country.

@user-ok9dc5qt8d

Жыл бұрын

Ce sont les setu.

@eksiarvamus

Жыл бұрын

@@user-ok9dc5qt8d Nope, Setos speak Estonian.

@user-ok9dc5qt8d

Жыл бұрын

@@eksiarvamus On parle en melange le russe et estonie

@eksiarvamus

Жыл бұрын

@@user-ok9dc5qt8d Russians speak Russian, Estonians (including Setos) speak Estonian. Russian is an immigrant language here, no younger Estonian is willing to speak to that illegal minority in their language. They either integrate or become totally socially disenfranchised, jobless, meaningless. It's their own choice, they can only blame themselves for the shitty situation they are in.

@user-ok9dc5qt8d

Жыл бұрын

@@eksiarvamus D'accord, j'en suis sur, vraiment c'est ca

How prevalant is old church Slavonic nowadays?

Pomeranian language should be renamed into Kashubian somewhere around late XIX century (when other remaining dialect called Slovincian was displaced by German through cultural assimilation). Nobody in Poland uses "pomeranian language" term in everyday speak, apart from linguists and historians.

@Macion-sm2ui

4 ай бұрын

Wasn't Slovincian dialect also part of Kashubian language? Actually he could name it Kashubian from the very begining.

4:31 Like, you know, there were always the Czech and Slovak dialects further and further diverging inbetween each other... That date is only when the Slovak language was officialy codified. Same thing with Ruthenian... Also Slovenian is incomprehensible for Serbocroatians (whose original dialects don´t differ according to national lines)

@Turagrong

3 жыл бұрын

I´d dare to say that Czech and Slovak are little bit closer than English and Scots - while English and Scots are definitely far closer than Czech and Polish (also due to Poland and Czechia being completely separate and distant most of the time and not mixing with or influencing each other)

@Turagrong

3 жыл бұрын

And it remains quite a mystery (to me at least) why then Slovak is so much more similar to Czech than to Polish... Even the Eastern Slovak said to be close to the local Polish dialects is closer to Czech than standardised Polish.

@881terror

2 жыл бұрын

@@Turagrong Czech is from Bohemian language. Slovak Moravian and Panonian Slavs are from Sloviene language. Polish is from Lechtic language group.

@LordDamianus

2 жыл бұрын

@@Turagrong Gtfo with your bullshit. You really must hate Poles to say this crap. Polish never mixed with Czech nor got influenced by it? LMAO. Czech had a huge impact on the Polish language ever since the Middle Ages. Many words from it are still used in Polish (hańba, obywatel, pawlacz, brama, wesele, etc.). Then, during the national revival when Czech was almost an extince language, many words were taken from Polish to replace the German ones. The reason why Polish and Czech aren't that similar as they used to be is because Czech is a recreated language with strong German-like hard pronunciation that displaced its palatalization. Being on the other sides of the Sudetes doesn't mean we were completely separated, dumbass.

@jarekdupa687

Жыл бұрын

@@881terror ...

Очень интересное видео, спасибо!

@CostasMelas

Жыл бұрын

Thank you

Wtf? Why did West Slavic languages split up so early?

@LordDamianus

3 жыл бұрын

@Jakub Kotek Damn Germans... I knew it was their fault. They divided us. Our brothers... :(

@barackobama6715

3 жыл бұрын

They weren’t unified. East Slavs had Kievan Rus’ until the Mongol invasions, and south Slavs weren’t as unified but still more than West ones.

@LordDamianus

3 жыл бұрын

@@barackobama6715 I'm saying that the West Slavs actually had a potential of creating one state together. Unfortunately, Czechs had found themselves in the German sphere of influence (Bohemia became a part of the Holy Roman Empire, plus Bohemia didn't have its own archdiocese thus making it dependent on the HRE). Poland didn't meet this fate. Although even if independent, it was still too weak to pull Bohemia out of German influence. Poland and Bohemia, however, did have a personal union at best.

@juniorcrusher2245

2 жыл бұрын

@@LordDamianus we had to split. I'm not sure if you know but theres a massive mountain range called the carpathians separating us

What's the music at 2:00?

@CostasMelas

3 жыл бұрын

See the description section below the video

@piter3

3 жыл бұрын

Right, thanks!

Silesian: Am I a joke to you

@stefankowalski347

4 жыл бұрын

Nie słyszałem nigdy nikogo mówiącego w tym języku, nawet na Śląsku. Ja sam mieszkam na Śląsku i nie znam żadnego słowa po śląsku

@Pingijno

4 жыл бұрын

@@stefankowalski347" Nie ma czarnych łabędzi, bo żadnego nie widziałem "

@stefankowalski347

4 жыл бұрын

@@Pingijno Dobrze, w takim razie poprawię

@peter-w

4 жыл бұрын

Greetings from a silesian living in germany 🙋‍♂️

@tonit4233

4 жыл бұрын

Not bigger joke than Macedonian that's for sure

Какими же стойкими типами были наши пращуры. Поклон им до земли за дела их вековые

Wow, that must've taken a lot of time to compile for sure. Talking about painstaking work. However, the Proto-Slavic area shown in the first minute of the video was in vast majority Baltic or Proto-Baltic. On the other hand a huge chunk of the actual Proto-Slavic area has been left blank where it should've been marked Proto-Slavic: that area was approximately the Odra and Wisła basins (+ some middle reaches of the Łaba), naturally restricted by the sea in the north and various mountain ranges in the south. Bordering (Proto-)Baltic in the north-east and east, Thracian in the south-east, Celtic to the south-west and Germanic in the west (also not forgetting the "das drittes Volk" there who were Proto-Balto-Slavic kin of some kind).

4:54 funny that the moment this song played that last note, the Russian language left the Caucasian countries

@extraditori6604

Жыл бұрын

It's still spoken here in Georgia, Armenia and Azerbaijan

@robsterlobsterr

Жыл бұрын

@@extraditori6604 true but not at the rate that they did during the Soviet Union

01:14 Atilla clearly helped the spread.

@bossschmutzfink9865

3 жыл бұрын

Avars

@881terror

2 жыл бұрын

it seem like attila was Slavic or official historician lie and Slavic had way bigger teritory

@danilapolesciuk4316

Жыл бұрын

At that point Attila was dead for like a century

@markymarco2570

Жыл бұрын

@@danilapolesciuk4316 means nothing

You forgot Old Novgorodian (North-East Slavic), which separated from Old Russian quite early, probably before the 9th century.

@user-ok9dc5qt8d

Жыл бұрын

До конца 15 века существовал. Уже во время Ливонской войны 1558-1583 гг. вышел из употребления.

@alexandermarkov300

Жыл бұрын

@@user-ok9dc5qt8d Спасибо, кеп.

What about Scythian? Are were slavic?

@bastianodimebag

3 жыл бұрын

No, Scythians were Iranic people, but they got some Slavic and Gothic influences

Your videos are awesomeeee

@CostasMelas

Жыл бұрын

Thank you

Like for Ruthenian.

Rip all the Baltic tribes that got eliminated by the Slavic migrations

@juniorcrusher2245

2 жыл бұрын

They just moved to today's baltics. They were eliminated.

@TheOlgaSasha

2 жыл бұрын

@@juniorcrusher2245 Balts were just assimilated.

If the Slavs were in eastern Europe at the time, then why were they intact from the massive hunnic, gothic and germanic migration from the east that eventually devastated Rome? Why did Rome never mention them?

@alekseibuinyi

3 жыл бұрын

The interaction of the Slavs with the Huns and Goths is rather complicated. With the Goths, Slavs fought, went on raids together, or were subdued by them. But when the Goths fled further west, to the Roman Empire, the Slavs partially went with them, but most remained in place. The Huns are a nomadic steppe culture that does not like forests. The Slavs retreated to the forests and the Huns did not touch them much. Moreover, there is an interesting idea that the Huns prepared the spread of the Slavs. The Huns went further to the west, and the Slavs, who needed arable land, simply left the forests and moved to the forest-steppe zone. Now about Rome. Herodotus and Jordanes (yes, not very roman) wrote about the Slavs. Actually, it worth mentioning that the Romans were not very good at ethnography... E.g., they regularly mixed Gallic and Germanic tribes.

@DM-nl7kf

3 жыл бұрын

Their historians are some liars. They came from Central Russia and near Northern Iran!

@amalgama2000

3 жыл бұрын

Actually, Roman historians did mention Slavic tribes by the names Antae (East Slavs) and Venedi (West Slavs)

@881terror

2 жыл бұрын

waht do you talking about. Romans know Slavic tribes Wenedae, Sclavene, Antae, Bastarnae, Peucine, Vandals, White Croats, Polanes, Boii=Bohemians, Quadi, Markomans= Moravians, Very often they speaking about Suebian or Suevian union = Slavic union, or other name for Slavic people was Irmiones.

@TarebossT

2 жыл бұрын

@@881terror Bastarnae, Vandals, Markomans (Markmen=men from the margin/borders) were Germanic tribes. Bastarnae had the same hairstyle as Suebians (the Suebian knot) as depicted on Trophaeum Traiani.

Interesting 👍

This is wrong on a lot of levels

@kkuwura

3 жыл бұрын

What exactly is wrong about it?

@bradleyagdern1477

3 жыл бұрын

@@kkuwura really? REALLY? You know what's wrong about it, Yoon? Ignorant people like you! THAT's what's wrong about it. Sheesh! You should be ashamed of yourself.

@DK-tv6rk

3 жыл бұрын

@@bradleyagdern1477 wat