Once s2000 comes, it'll be able to shoot down missiles and planes before they are even constructed

@birthdwt8859

2 жыл бұрын

S0000 will be able to time travel back to the person who developed the target.

@mauser98kar

2 жыл бұрын

Temporal missiles.

@ilijabosnjak76

2 жыл бұрын

😂

@breadman32398

2 жыл бұрын

almost as good as the anti-RPG systems on vehicles that detect and destroy RPGs before they're even fired by the user.

@richardkammerer2814

2 жыл бұрын

That’s impossi………………….

This’ll come handy when my neighbor flies his little drone copter over my house...

@rogerwehbe182

2 жыл бұрын

😂

@ChipmunkRapidsMadMan1869

2 жыл бұрын

If kill is good Overkill is better

@nesseihtgnay9419

2 жыл бұрын

If it works

@mdem2040

2 жыл бұрын

🤣🤣

@quisqueyanguy120

2 жыл бұрын

That thing can even shoot down satellites, lol

Yeah, my neighbor too threatens me with ballistic missiles. Hopefully KommandoStore and the S-500 Prometheus will fix this problem.

@birthdwt8859

2 жыл бұрын

Put legos on his lawn

@victorrenevaldiviasoto9728

2 жыл бұрын

What about Nord VPN? And raid shadow legends? Do they help with ballistic missile threats?

@konstantinoskountousias3099

2 жыл бұрын

the best will be to nuke him first

@annelisemeier283

2 жыл бұрын

Ivan can’t even nitrogen purge fucking NVG tubes, god forbid you buy anything that is supposed to actually do anything other than exist.

@NoBullNate

2 жыл бұрын

I feel like the KommandoStore ad got edited.

Watching Russian missile launches in snow always has an 80’s vibe to me.

@TheCJUN

2 жыл бұрын

'Spies Like Us'

@Sh4d891

2 жыл бұрын

@@daltonv5206 Wolveriiiiines

@billjames8036

2 жыл бұрын

@@TheCJUN Haha was thinking the exact same thing.... ;-)

@freedomfrogs4847

2 жыл бұрын

We'll offset global warming with some good old nuclear winter

@lc9245

2 жыл бұрын

​@@JigilJigil F-16 and F-15 still rule the sky, completely undefeated. Both were designed in the 70s so they can be considered 60s technology with modern gadgets.

S-500 main purpose is to intercept priority targets, such as: awacs planes on 500km+ distances, warheads on final part of trajectory, low orbit intelligence satellites and etc. F22/35 or any other jets are not priority targets for this system, with them will handle S-400, S-350, S-300, Buk, Thor and Pantsir, depend on distances.

@joshc.1871

2 жыл бұрын

But all of those will be destroyed by cheap Turkish drones and Israeli suicide drones. And the Russian ppl will still live on 13000 USD a year. 🤣 Which Western country are you living in?

@serghw

2 жыл бұрын

@@joshc.1871, i live in Moscow - the capital of Russia ))) You, buddy, should more use your own brain instead of listening the trash-talks from the west politicians. And of course, should watch west TV less than you actually do it. Dollar of course is the powerful weapon, but missiles are better in many occasions)))

@CDSAfghan

2 жыл бұрын

​@@serghw Watch the footage. You can easily see many russian systems being defeated in Syria and Armenia. Turkey is in Nato, you think that we won't pull apart and study the S400? Like we did in Greece with the S300. NATO pilots train against Russian/Soviet aircraft, and A2D weapons, while Russian pilots are lucky if they get 100hrs a year. Let's be real Russia is an arms dealer now. You sell your subs to india, your carriers to China, air defense to Turkey. How is the Kutznesov doing? Rumour has it you'll sell an S500 to india and we'll make a big deal about how we don't want them purchasing it, but the truth is we'll soon see every detail about it if we haven't already. Russia can't even make modern jets without partnerships and when those fail the jet gets shelved.

@CDSAfghan

2 жыл бұрын

And no one worships the dollar more than Russian politicians

@SFDPSFDP

2 жыл бұрын

@@CDSAfghan The US still has no tactical answer to the S-400, all the currently operational air to ground missiles and smart bombs are ineffective against it . Besides Turkey (despite obsolete nato membership) is closer to Russia now and has no interest whatsoever to share any sensitive information with the US given the recent history of their relationships ( state coup, syria etc) and their exclusion from the F35 tech sharing. They would weaken themselves by doing that anyways, they just bought it, why would they be dumb enough to reveal its secret and lose trust from Russia for no gain.

Getting excited about a weapons system... Within every man is a 7 year old and it's great.

@hughlevantjames905

2 жыл бұрын

ayy

@gebys4559

2 жыл бұрын

If not for the shit salaries, I would have loved to go into missile development. It's just such intricate and extreme engineering, utterly pointless to human development but yet so satisfying.

@Odin31b

2 жыл бұрын

I remember discussing the apache helicopter with friends in elementary school. Maybe you're correct.

@birthdwt8859

2 жыл бұрын

@@gebys4559 what sorts of projects do you enjoy instead?

@Panicscroll69

2 жыл бұрын

That’s hilarious, I’ve had that backwards for years 😂

Binkov releases a 50 second video.. mean while here we get a full 11 minutes. Awww yeah

@kameronjones7139

2 жыл бұрын

I have generally preferred this channel

@theluftwaffle1

2 жыл бұрын

@@kameronjones7139 As do I. Binkov focuses more on being entertaining, but sometimes gets his information wrong. Cabal goes all in on his topic.

@d.j.9095

2 жыл бұрын

There's a sweet spot between informative and entertaining. 11 mins is not that spot. Still upvoted though.

@Jay-bf8yp

2 жыл бұрын

I like both. Binkov gets into wargaming stuff, emphasizing the geographic and social implications of the scenarios he looks at. I'm not into the fantasy stuff (Modern supercarrier vs Japanese Navy), but I like his analysis of how potential modern conflicts could play out. I like this channel too. Little fluff and information is expressed very efficiently.

@julwiezdeghorz5089

2 жыл бұрын

Binkov prefers fairy tales. He is even very late for the Sukoi LTS 😊

Normal people love watching vids of cars they’ll never afford. I love watching vids of military tech, that I’d have to steal to use.

@ThatCarGuy

2 жыл бұрын

I do both... lol

@dhurjatinarayangiri1590

2 жыл бұрын

I watch because our army can buy it

@sethgaston8347

2 жыл бұрын

@@ThatCarGuy The name says it all my friend 😁

@sethgaston8347

2 жыл бұрын

@@dhurjatinarayangiri1590 Where you from bro, your name sounds Desi 😎

@sethgaston8347

2 жыл бұрын

@Tanveer Ahmed Tantray Facts 💯

My neighbor recently purchased several D26 ballistic missiles so this will come in handy

@mnemonicpie

10 ай бұрын

Imagine a situation in the hood💀

@andresmartinezramos7513

10 ай бұрын

​@@mnemonicpieThere are SSBNs in the pools

At the end, every air defense system has their own strength and weaknesses. Even the top line air defences has either the speciality to defend against cruise missile, aircraft, or ballistic missile

@gahdhsh623

2 жыл бұрын

thats why you have to combine and support them with other tech

@Volodymyr_SVD

2 жыл бұрын

Actually China recently kind of developed interesting thing for ships (but may be done on other platforms as well). So the main benefit of this system is that it has 8 launch pods and 3 types of rockets, one against huge missiles (ballistic or cruise ones), second for height altitude or long range jets, third type is placed as 4 in one pod (meaning that it fit in 1 pod but those are 4 rockets) and those required to shutdown fast but close targets like ones which gone though first two types of rockets. So all together it allows to target any type of threads from singe lunch station which is sound pretty cool. Anyway those are marketing information, how good those rockets and target lock systems we don't know and I hope that we will never know. Make love, not war, peace brothers!

@benromign7612

2 жыл бұрын

@@Volodymyr_SVD Yup, American Arleigh Burke destroyers started that decades ago. Chinese copied the design. Like they do with everything else.

@benromign7612

2 жыл бұрын

@otto Lincoln like what? Please, name what was copied?

@dianapennepacker6854

Жыл бұрын

Probably for the best. You can't make one for all. Small drones to slow moving aircraft for instance definitely should not be using missiles. The S 500... The size of thing is outstanding to me.

**Since I bought a big ass gun, all the bullies in my neighborhood suddenly turned quite polite....hmmm I wonder why**

I'll believe the S-500's prowess when I see it in action. Until that time, it's just more vaporware, like the T14 Armata and the SU-57. Heck, its predecessors the S300 and S400 have been pretty underwhelming, as has the Pantsir. It can't even target low and slow flying drones in Ukraine, something it was specifically designed for. Russian military equipment since the cold war appears to be more propaganda than anything else. It fails once it hits the field,

@romanpyatibratov4361

Жыл бұрын

Same goes for NATO's Javelins, Stingers, M177, HIMARIS and any other weaponry, that sent to Ukraine. As they not stopping "Russian military equipment, that appears to be more propaganda than anything else". Modern warfare is a battle of cost effectivness. You can spend $10mil rocket to take down a $5mil drone, but it is not a great outcome. And all videos i watched, where S300 or S400 were shown "underwhelming" are in scenarios against overwhelmingly bigger threat both in numbers and cost. Like 20 tomahawk missiles and 10 F-35 with bunch of expensive rockets. With total cost of literal $billions destroyed S-400 system with couple buks, pantsir and other AA systems with total cost less than a $billion. Nobody says S-300, S-400, S-500 is unkillable complex of unpenetrable defense. It's just these complex systems are the BEST in terms of quality and cost. I havent watched much about Patriot systems. But i know for a fact - its more expensive. Even if Patriot is better than S-400, but more expensive. 5 Patriots will perform worse, than 10 S-400. And why buy 5 Patriots if you can get 10 S-400 for the same price? (numbers are not exact, just to show an example). P.S. i actually googled it. First article CNBC tells that S-400 complex costs $500mil. While patriot battery costs $1bil. Funny that i actually got numbers somewhat correct xD

@akanoob2072

Жыл бұрын

By this logic, Western equipment is mostly propaganda too. We don't have more credibility by default.

@RegulatorSevenZeroSeven

Жыл бұрын

I was under the impression that the reason TB2's did so well in the early days was because the Russian AA wasn't even looking for targets as their commanding officers were lied to by command that Russia achieved total air superiority.

@RegulatorSevenZeroSeven

Жыл бұрын

However the Pantsir being a disappointment is also very likely.

@akanoob2072

Жыл бұрын

@@RegulatorSevenZeroSeven look, even the Patriot is a "dissapointment" if you hold it to difficult criteria. Air defense units aren't made to be 100% effective. Even the Iron Dome has a 90% chance that reduces if overwhelmed. If 1000 grad rockets are fired, about 100 will pass through. Does that make it a bad AA System if something passed through? Absolutely not.

This is a serious treat to birds having fun around the neighborhood

@vitalegvitalegov

2 жыл бұрын

No they use ecology friendly fuel.

@sjwarialaw8155

2 жыл бұрын

@@vitalegvitalegov carbon free?

That's correct - the 77N6 missiles shown in the video are designed to intercept other missiles (short range ballistic, gliders, possibly ICBM warheads during re-entry). The anti-aircraft missile is called 40N6M and is an improved version of the S-400's 40N6. The S-500 system (launcher, radar, etc.) in its anti-aircraft configuration will most likely look just like the S-400 with an improved radar and improved long-range missiles that are derived directly from their predecessors. Also, while A-235 is essentially a Russian's GBI, the anti-missile configuration of the S-500 is said to be able to work as a part of the A-235 system by adding a THAAD-like final defense layer.

Thank you for the research in this video!

Finally. I ordered one last night, they said it's already been ship. Now i can shoot down my neighbors annoying drone, despite multiple warning they kept violating our backyards airspace. My options were the j-20 or this, but i realized building a runway for the j-20 was very costly.

@dashknow5082

2 жыл бұрын

you pick the right choice bud

It's going to be canonized as a saint by the Russian orthodox Church.

@valeremkin5188

13 күн бұрын

Correct as US and EU are Satanic cultures.

one thing that was very noticeable from this video, was how quickly the s500 missiles accelerated compared to all the other systems shown, other than that, you can only speculate about it's true capabilities. maybe Russia has figured out a way to accurately track stealth aircraft, maybe they haven't, maybe they figured a way to make a single missile perform well against multiple target types, maybe they haven't.

@KHETTIUS

2 жыл бұрын

@@paulbarclay4114 Is there a source for this? i find this highly unlikely, but not at all impossible.

@odinSvobodyiNik

2 жыл бұрын

@@KHETTIUS "stealth" is a meme. it's working only, if your enemy have only one radar with specific working wave-length in operational area. if enemy have at least two or/and with different working wave-length, then "stealth" become useless. If you'll look into complectation of S-400, you'll see that there few different radars for detection of targets with different working wavelengths, and there are bunch of different radars that could be added to standart stack.

@ytsks

2 жыл бұрын

@@paulbarclay4114 sure they did.

@mnemonicpie

10 ай бұрын

Great analysis, you should create your own channel

@bakinginc.3844

2 ай бұрын

maybe but i would like to know how they know that it would funktion even tho they dont have any stealth fighters for testing

Oh my God finally!!! My neighborhood has been in a cold war for the last month. My worst one already has a B-2 spirit raider. This'll come in handy keeping it away from my home.

Damn, being a passenger on a Ukrainian airline just got a lot more dangerous.

@ignaciomunizdiaz5194

2 жыл бұрын

Ukranian air defence ( the ones Who shootdown the mh17) never will have this beauty

@madara8918

2 жыл бұрын

Ukraine shot down their own plane? Got a source for that claim amigo?

@ignaciomunizdiaz5194

2 жыл бұрын

@@madara8918 They be so incompetent to do that. They have shootdown the malasian mh17 and the siberian ones. Sorry they shootdown the mh17 on porpouse to justify the biden's war

@mattatenta1444

2 жыл бұрын

@@ignaciomunizdiaz5194 MH17 happened before Biden's presidency?

@ignaciomunizdiaz5194

2 жыл бұрын

@@mattatenta1444 LOL... THE NUDLAND PAPPERS PROOF WHO BE JOE BIDEN THE ONE WHO ORDERS THE UKRANIAN COUP AND DICTACTORSHIP. OBAMA ONLY WAS THEIR PUPPET

Its similar to THAAD, its a mid tier ballistic interceptor. Highest altitude it can go is 200 km if im not wrong, while THAAD at 150 km. Probably will be used in conjunction with the A-135, or the A-235 once it comes out, as a dedicated ABM. For SRBM this will do, or as another line of defense if its bigger brothers failed to intercept MRBM, IRBM, and ICBMs.

@bluemarlin8138

10 ай бұрын

THAAD’s official ceiling is 150km, but we don’t know if it’s greater in actuality. Either way, THAAD-ER will be operational in a few years and should close any real or perceived gap. SM-3’s ceiling is supposedly 160 km, but again, that’s “official” and is being improved. Ruzzia still has no analogue for either GBMD for midcourse intercepts, or PAC-3 for point defense (which as we can see, is pretty impressive and vastly improved over older versions). Nor does Ruzzia have anything close to the SM-6, which can hit maneuvering fighter-sized targets at 450km, and is much more maneuverable than S-400’s longest ranged missile. These AEGIS systems also come with much more powerful radars than the Ruzzian systems because (1) the US radar tech is better, and (2) they can draw power from a whole ship (or ground installation) instead of just a truck mounted launcher. PAC-2 may not have great range, but it’s certainly not bad range. Long range anti-aircraft work over land is what the USAF is for.

@johnsilver9338

10 ай бұрын

@@bluemarlin8138 THAAD-ER won't likely be purchased as that would defeat the purpose of Aegis SM-3 Block 1. SM-3 Block 1A can reach 600km altitude. While Block IIA can reach 1450km to 2350km as ICBMs will climb that high. Hence why SM-3 can also be used as an ASAT missile targeting LEO satallites.

1:01 to 1:04 randomly cuts all audio, not sure how or why

@rradical4714

2 жыл бұрын

i noticed the same and was looking for your comment!

@LewisPalmer1234

2 жыл бұрын

Same

@jamesrocket5616

2 жыл бұрын

Same

Nice one! At 7:20 you managed to say Iranian that sounded almost correct and no like Aye, ranian.

The S 500 key component is the warhead (a new multi-purpose explosive). As for one of the radars, it's similar to the IDF EL/M-2080 Green Pine or the US AN/TPY-2. (Over the Horizon type)

The S-500 is designed to work in tandem with the S-400 in the same way the S-300 did for years. It's just now the S-400 will be dedicated to aircraft, while the S-500 will be primarily for ICBM's, though it isn't uncommon for Russia to deploy multiple launchers types in one battalion, as prior to the S-400, multiple variants of the S-300 would be deployed in the same unit.

Russia's performance in Ukraine is showing that much of the performance of their weapons systems are wildly overblown, all bark and little bite...so color me highly doubtful until they're operationally proven.

@elozinoemeovrode9779

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah the propaganda war got you too…when the fog of war is over you will now how powerful their weapons are…

@Myungbean

2 жыл бұрын

@@elozinoemeovrode9779 if their systems are as powerful as they (and you) have claimed, then why not bring them in and end this decisively? Their struggle to achieve aerial superiority is the most glaring issue. With thr current state of their economy from sanctions, they can ill afford to prolong the conflict. For the "second" most powerful military in the world, they're looking incredibly inept right now. And it wouldn't be the first time there's been a revelation that Russia embellished its capabilities. The same thing happened after the USSR collapsed and the west got good looks at equipment inherited by breakaway SSRs.

@quantumedits272

2 жыл бұрын

@@Myungbean Russia has proven it can deploy hypersonic missiles whilst others only have them in concepts

@Myungbean

2 жыл бұрын

@@quantumedits272 True, but have you looked up the design of the Kinzhal? It's nothing particularly technically impressive. The US and China could probably build something very similar very quickly. It seems to share a stage with the Iskander SRBM, making the Kinzhal a glorified reentry vehicle, albeit one that's fire from a plane. When they break out the Avangard, then I'll be somewhat impressed.

@rogue__agent5884

2 жыл бұрын

Well no Most equipment used in Ukraine are outdated T-72B3 T-80 for example

Nice analysis. Thanks for the video.

I have ordered 5 for my lovely family!

@FusionC6

2 жыл бұрын

what a lucky family!

@guestimator121

2 жыл бұрын

For them, or against them? :-)

That was a great ad. Love the intro lol

There's a chance atleast one of the missile variants has multiple warheads to engage low altitude threats with greater reaction speed than the s400.

@sjwarialaw8155

2 жыл бұрын

I truly doubt that because there's really no point, they have a lot o other anti-air missile systems that do that already. This missiles are way too big and expensive to be used against unreliable target acquisitions.

@zinjanthropus322

2 жыл бұрын

@@sjwarialaw8155 The larger missile could carry a larger radar to provide better target acquisition and provide a far longer range for the multiple short range missiles within. It would come in handy dealing with large fleets of attack aircraft, drones or bombers.

@sjwarialaw8155

2 жыл бұрын

@@zinjanthropus322 won't deny that is a cool idea but I have serious doubts that any country has the technology to pull that of in an efficient way.

@digimaks

2 жыл бұрын

@@sjwarialaw8155 Yes you are correct. Appearance of S-500 doesn't mean they are planning to retire S-400 and S-300. S-500 is basically an ADDITION to the already existing capabilities.

I'm guessing to solve the problem of possibility of kill solutions would be the same way they use the s-400 and have more then 3 in most groups, and not just that but they will be used alongside the s-400 and s-300

I hope the civilian version of these will be available soon here in u.s. I'm so excited to finally have this

@digimaks

2 жыл бұрын

I'm sure it might be useful against BLM rioters ))))

@user-tl2cs6wv8b

2 жыл бұрын

@@digimaks A sling shot with a good amount of pebbles works fine against protestors imo.

@user-fm6py7fr5x

9 ай бұрын

Для вас будет супер высокоточная версия, которая стреляет только по афганским свадьбам ....

@omskpravo55

9 ай бұрын

​@@digimaksпротив ЛГБТ и БЛМ, нужно использовать дубину и огонь.

@gapant69

4 ай бұрын

Yeah, can’t hunt ducks without this bad boy 😊

We need video about A-235 and russian anti-ICBM defences.

I haven't read the comment flow and maybe I'll repeat things others have already said. Your video lacks a lot of known info about the S-500 because it's usually in Russian. I know the language so I can add some useful insights. The S-500 WILL work in unison with the S-400 as an extra layer of defense. No, the radars for the new system are NOT an upgrade or a derivative of the S-400 radars such as the 'tombstone'. All radars are a completely new architecture with no common parts with the older systems. S-400 is after all an upgraded Soviet S-300. The S-500 search & track was tested extensively in Syria to debug the system and validate that the preset goals were met. Russian air defense thinking is based on a philosophy of a layered system divided between the air&space defense troops ( point defense) and the air defense of the ground forces in movement. S-500 will most likely come under the air&space air denese forces to protect important military and industrial targets.

@freedomfrogs4847

2 жыл бұрын

А, все одно, прикрывают, но не защищают

@digimaks

2 жыл бұрын

Satellites is one of its important capabilities.

What about as a large missile for longer range and to have the size to put a proper AESA radar and the computing equipment to work with ground-based L-band, X-band, and s-band radars.

Countermeasures and counter-tactics are evolving. AARGM-ER fired from standoff range will be able to take out targeting radar. These S series systems are vulnerable.

@Pao234_

Жыл бұрын

Not if they shoot from far enough

S-500 works against several target types but its obvious that it is the ABM complement to the S-400.

I am more impressed with the capabilities of the transport trucks, boy the kind of load I could move with those ..

@digimaks

2 жыл бұрын

Think those trucks drink fuel like a horse.

@buildindian8169

2 жыл бұрын

@@digimaks hmmm we will use natural gas from Ukraine..cheap and clean

Amazing work.

I saw that S500 video 3 years ago and feels like yesterday .. feels old ❤️

How soon before China buys few and then has a whole fleet of them? Then we can buy one on eBay for $19.99 with free shipping.

@zoka7108

2 жыл бұрын

The HQ-26 already exists

If that missile has a *Solid Fuled Ducted Ramjet Engine* like Meteor Missile, then it will be smaller and also agile against all planes. It will be a killer.

@themax9913

2 жыл бұрын

For the altitude it would operate at, and the speed of targets it would need to intercept, a Scramjet might be more reliable than a ramjet, a mix of the 2 would be ideal but hard to make compact.

@DonVigaDeFierro

2 жыл бұрын

@@themax9913 Ye, but the technology is fairly simple in principle, so it's not unlikely they have already a technology demonstrator of some sort with a small size.

@themax9913

2 жыл бұрын

@@DonVigaDeFierro In principle, the technology is achievable, for both ramjet & scramjet, however, a mix of the 2 (to operate in both environment) would be better, and that one is harder to achieve and minaturise, tho i believe russia could do it with some effort, just like the US or France could.

@quinndenver4075

2 жыл бұрын

What does the type of engine it have have to do with its maneuverability characteristics?. A similar U.S system already in use, the sm-3 missile that is part of the USN AEGIS system uses a separate kinetic kill vehicle in its terminal stage that has lateral thrusters to rapidly change course at Mach 12+

@trolleriffic

7 ай бұрын

​@@quinndenver4075 A rocket-ramjet can achieve significantly higher specific impulse (kinda like fuel efficiency for reaction engines) than a regular rocket engine, and it can burn for longer using a given mass of fuel. Lots of guided missiles have a rocket engine which only burns for a short period (8 seconds for the AIM-120C) so beyond fairly short ranges, most of the flight will be unpowered as the missile glides towards the target. Problem is that manoeuvres impose a large drag penalty which slows the missile down even more, and control surfaces get less effective as the speed drops so it doesn't take much manoeuvring to kill the performance and range of the missile. Since a rocket-ramjet can burn for much longer, the missile can still be in powered flight when it starts manoeuvring to intercept a target that's trying to evade. This allows it to maintain speed and performance even at long ranges.

You need to do a video on the new laser tech coming out. The one where a pulse a fraction of a second long with a huge range given the right conditions.

It can also be used for meteors, it was mentioned in another video...

Russia has been getting a lot of real world practice over the years. You don’t get good playing basket ball against a 5 ft player. You play against someone good and either adapt or get run down.

@ade_adegboye005

2 жыл бұрын

Haven't seen S300 and S400 shot down any aircraft in Syria. Israel keeps ravaging Iranian proxies in the region.

@victorzvyagintsev1325

2 жыл бұрын

@@ade_adegboye005 To be fair, Israel uses Lebanon mountains as cover. SAMs are useless in such situations. All Syrians can do is shoot down incoming missiles.

@harambetidepod1451

2 жыл бұрын

Steel sharpens steel

@PeterbFree

2 жыл бұрын

Israel has a deal with Russia, for now. The Syrians however did shoot down an F35 with an upgraded old S200 system. The Israelis said it was a bird strike, but that the aircraft was damaged beyond repair…. So the Syrians shot at it, but a bird hit it….

@ade_adegboye005

2 жыл бұрын

@@PeterbFree I am still looking for images of wreakage /debris. That's a fake story. If it was true, the images will be a propaganda tool. For your information, bird strike is actually a bird strike. It's common. A KZread search will help

Does Amazon sell these or do I have to look on Ebay?

That is why the Russians rolled out the new Abakan missile system for work with ballistic targets at the Army-2021 exhibition. Abakan is the world's first specialized anti-aircraft missile system designed to combat high-speed high-altitude targets with ballistic trajectories. Before "Abakan", no one had created specialized anti-aircraft missile systems in the world. The composition of "Abakan" is as follows: unified multifunctional radar (UMR) for reconnaissance and target designation for the guidance of missiles 98L6AE "Yenisei-E"; up to four 51P6E2 launchers with 9M82MDE missiles; power supply means. Launcher (PU) "Abakan" - from the anti-aircraft missile system S-300V4. Its export version is called Antey-2500. This launcher in "Abakan" is only switched from a caterpillar to a wheeled one. As a rule, caterpillars are not encouraging to potential customers in the Middle East, and this is not least due to the nature of the terrain. The 9M82MDE missile is a modified version of the product also from the S-300V4 air defense missile system. It is sometimes referred to as a "heavy" rocket. If there are several Abakan air defense systems in the grouping, it can be assigned a command post (command post). The performance characteristics of the Abakan air defense system are as follows: firing range at ballistic targets (min / max, km) - 12/40; target height (min / max, km) - 2/30; target speed - up to 4000 m / s; the number of simultaneously tracked targets and missiles aimed at them is 4/8. The maximum height of the hitting ballistic targets of 30 km looks, at first glance, relatively small. However, when individual developers claim that they will make systems with a height of destruction of ballistic objects of 70-80 km, then statements of this kind raise certain doubts. The fact is that at altitudes of more than 50 km, due to the rarefaction of the air, the aerodynamic rudders of the rocket become ineffective. Beyond this border of altitude, there is already a completely different environment. And it is necessary to make for a rocket or shunting engines, and control the product using gas rudders. Technically, it is possible to solve a similar problem. Only the price of the rocket in this case will be completely different. It is noteworthy that the "Yenisei-E" UMR steadily accompanies air objects with a very small reflective surface - about 0.01 sq. m. In the mode of firing at ballistic targets "Yenisei" is intended for search, detection, capture and tracking, recognition by trajectory signs for issuing target designation at high-altitude and high-speed targets to 51P6E2 launchers with 9M82MDE missiles. Another undoubted advantage of "Abakan" (in view of its narrow specialization) is the minimum composition of combat units and vehicles, as well as personnel of the combat crew - 4 people.

The animation show a hypersonic glide vehicle receiving inputs from satellites while a plasma is formed around the body, do to air friction heating. I thought that radio signals are severely attenuated in a plasma field.

Hey, you just referred to my favourite hiking pack as an artefact.

FINALLY the S 500! Now I can get a good nights sleep again

Thanks

7:26 Wow, I sure am enjoying camping here in this desert. 7:27 Wow, I am now chunky soup.

With so few missiles I am not sure how effective it will be. I mean the thaad and pac3 carriers 4 -8 times as many missiles (8-16) per launcher. This is a massive deal when going up against ballistic missile or any other fast target

@gebys4559

2 жыл бұрын

They do completely different jobs, THAAD targets things moving parabolically whilst patriots missiles have lower range, ceiling and top speed of the target.

@kameronjones7139

2 жыл бұрын

@@gebys4559 obviously,they are meant to work in tandem when destroying ballistic type targets however you are completely missing the point of what I am saying. I was not comparing the thaad and pac3 I was saying that in there field the s500 is very under gunned when compared to them when dealing with fast targets. That is my point

@vadrak6197

2 жыл бұрын

Both THAAD and PAC 3 have significant less capabilities than S-500. The latter is significant larger missile because has a lot more range and flight altitude and speed almost twice as much of that of THAAD and that requires a lot bigger booster. The S-500 is a category on its own, between a THAAD and a GMD or S-400 and A-235. The S-500 is also reported to be capable of carrying a variant of the 53T6M missile which is part of the A-235 silo ABM system.

@kameronjones7139

2 жыл бұрын

@@vadrak6197 oh really? Based off of what statistic are you getting this from? Also you are still flat out ignoring that it only has 2 missiles even if it some how has a significantly higher hit rate (which it hasn't proven to ) it still won't do much because again it had two missiles per launcher

@themax9913

2 жыл бұрын

@@kameronjones7139 Well, the amount of missiles carried by a TEL is not really a concern, TEL are far from being the most expensive part of an air defense system and you can just assign more TEL to your system for more ammunitions. But the S-500 is indeed intended for a longer range and higher altitude than the THAAD and therefore require a bigger missile, on paper, more launchers per TEL is a good thing but it’s also important to not sacrifice strategic mobility, the configuration of 2 launcher per TEL seems to be a good trade-off for the russian doctrine which favour mobility for such systems.

Peace through strength -

@christophermarkee5445

2 жыл бұрын

Offer one hand an arm the other

@DonVigaDeFierro

2 жыл бұрын

- Peace through superior firepower.

@QualityPen

2 жыл бұрын

Level 1: Peace Level 2: Peace through strength Level 3: Peace through superior strength ... Level 100: Peace through total global thermonuclear annihilation Can’t break the peace if there’s nobody alive to break it.

@christophermarkee5445

2 жыл бұрын

@@QualityPen nukes are played out I want to see Rod's of God giant pieces of tungsten rods ramming into the Earth at Mach 5 now that would be something to see.☄

These system are vulnerable to saturation attacks. In 2017 the US launched 59 Tomawk cruise missiles to hit Syrian Shayrat Airfield in syn, at various targets in the same airfield. The same tactic with all missiles aiming at any S400 or S500 main radar and control units arriving at different angles would have taken them out because inferior missiles have vast numerical superiority. Not to mention precision ground artillary attacks.

@glebskakovsky9475

2 жыл бұрын

Ofcourse every anti-air system in a world now is vulnerable to such type of attack. But when you compare Russia with Syria and doing far going conclusions i can reply that Patriot is absolutely uneffective due to well known cases when they even did not prevented attack and damage. But we both know that in these cases there were real people operating them poorly and standalone system never decides. Russia primarily developed S-500 for it's own defense which is deeply echeloned and S-500 will be accomplished by S-400 / S-350 / Buk / Thor e.t.c with long range radars like Voronezh, satellites, aviation radars like A-50/A-100 to detect and classify targets. Fleed, aviation and ground systems are now all integrated (like USA does) into complex commandment system which adequately protects key infrastructure objects. Ofcourse all that systems are vulnerable and there is count of weapons and military stuff which can be used to win an exact battle, but then nuclear weapons start being used and all tactics crumble into sand, because very much different nuclear ammo type can be used in different combinations neutraling almost every superiority achieved by saturation. It's like F-22 for example. If it will be used against Russia in it's territory highly likely it will be uneffective and destroyed, because of lack of it's main advantage : stealthness . As we change the territory to USA all changes to opposite outcome: F-22 becomes perfect defender in USA's sky, because it's supported by ground and sea anti-air systems, defended by other aviation so has very strong support. Now Russia does not export S-500 and inventing S-550 system, and imho S-500 will not be exported for at least decade. Every standalone system has drawbacks, while power comes with synergy.

@joem0088

2 жыл бұрын

@@glebskakovsky9475 Thank you for very informative reply :)

At 2:38 did you see the high speed rod flying across the screen from the right? They are occasionally caught on film and they seem to favor military stuff

@jackflash128

2 жыл бұрын

2:43

Many people has been waiting the S-500 for sooooo long 😁 haha

They could’ve named them using 1, 2 ,3 , 4 etc, but there’s just something about using hundreds that make it that much more intimidating

@Mike-rt1vh

2 жыл бұрын

F16,18, 22, 35s...

@digimaks

2 жыл бұрын

It stands for some sort of coding of the system. They started with S-50 systems back in the day, (but it had a nickname instead). There were S-100. For example Syria still has S-250. Remember when Trump has ordered to launch cruise missile strike on Syria - 47 cruise missiles- the quarter of those tomohawks were shot down by these good old S-250. The rest were taken down by S-300 both, by Russian and Syrian defense. Only 7 were not shot down, because they fell somewhere in the desert.

@mnemonicpie

10 ай бұрын

No, there are actually 1,2,3 etc... Hundreds just stands for a major update

Thank you for taking the time to put this together!

In my view, the S-500 will fill the capability gap between the S-400 and the future A-235 system (PL-19 Nudol), this will then form a multi-layered air defense/ballistic missile defense system. According to the Commander of the Missile Defense Troops, Major General Sergei Babakov, the S-500 is designed to engage ICBM warheads when they are in the terminal phase. In my view in the hypothetical event of a ICBM or SLBM attack the first system that would be engage is the PL-19 Nudol which is stated to be also road mobile, if any warheads get pass Nudol, the S-500 will engage, then the S-400 or S-300V4. Potentially smaller systems like the S-350 might be used as well just like what South Korea is doing with the KM-SAM (Cheongung Block 2) which is designed to counter ballistic missiles, that is my thought.

@qarmatianwarhorse6028

2 жыл бұрын

Nudol will engage hypersonic missiles also? Because that is the next step in missile development.

@dansantos1659

2 жыл бұрын

@@qarmatianwarhorse6028 Russian sources labels Nudol as a anti-satellite and long-range missile interceptor. Plus, Nudol is designed to work in tandem with the A-235 system that protects Moscow as it is integrated with the Don-2N radar. Another indication is that the Nudol is designed for missile defense is that the Nudol missile is "manuevering" for "head-on or overlapping" to the target.

@jonv.6213

6 ай бұрын

Those are russian sources tho@@dansantos1659

Everyone covers S-500 in detail and no one looking at Su-75. It seems everyone thinks it's not gonna work

@ebek4806

2 жыл бұрын

Everyone been waiting for the S-500 for a decades now. Su-75 is intended for export and will only be relevant if someone orders it that's why no one currently cares

@themax9913

2 жыл бұрын

The Su-75 for now is only a mock-up, prototypes are planned for later and it’s only then that speculations will be possible with it. I do believe it has a great potential but I think the price will be higher than 30M$ (likely 60M$ at least) and it needs to have guarantees of being successful at exportation cause otherwise it’s money thrown down the bin. Russia could buy some once it enter service to influence further buyers but it could be a gamble with no further foreign purchase, only time will tell.

@QualityPen

2 жыл бұрын

Russia wanted to have a deal to export the Su-57 to India, but India didn’t want to help fund the development unless it also got the blueprints.

@lukabogdanovic4658

2 жыл бұрын

@@themax9913 the Russian goverment wants to buy the SU 75's

@themax9913

2 жыл бұрын

@@lukabogdanovic4658 No, the russian government did not say anything about it yet. The su-75 is a private veinture by the UAC and they are still looking for investment which is why they are so much willing to get guarantees of export.

That THAAD-like system ? Hell yeah!

@kameronjones7139

2 жыл бұрын

@HellYeaNixon the video controdicts that

@themax9913

2 жыл бұрын

@HellYeaNixon You misunderstood the video, the S-500 by design is not intended to engage small targets which will instead be engaged by the S-400 or SHORAD elements.

@Nekminute

2 жыл бұрын

Thaad sux donkey dong

@jungtaemin1639

2 жыл бұрын

@HellYeaNixon would you use a 120mm tank gun to kill a rabbit?

@Clickathon

2 жыл бұрын

THAAD = 900kg, 8x Launcher, 150km ceiling S-500 = 3000kg+ (guess), 2x launcher Not very alike...

If we know the S400 system is the best in the world, we could only imagine for what capable is this beast.

@djavoizkrsaful

9 ай бұрын

😂😂😂😂😂😂 Yes for sure! 😂😂😂😂😂😂 🤡

@jonv.6213

6 ай бұрын

PFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF AHAHA

@GegeDxD

6 ай бұрын

​​@@djavoizkrsafulYes, that is according to the experts between who Americans too and you can laugh all you want. How's Ukraine doing, by the way?

@djavoizkrsaful

6 ай бұрын

Till now 300k ATACAS greetings!

What is the blob on a stick for? So that kamikaze drones coming in at 300 km/h at tree-top height have something to spot it by from 10 km away .. This chariot is made for a type of war long since obsolete .. That of high flying large fighter-bombers.

The Russians will probably claim to have a weapon that can blow up Jupiter

For some reason, Covert Cabal videos always have me in the mood to play ICBM and cover the world in nuclear warheads.

@sjwarialaw8155

2 жыл бұрын

Oh... I'm always in that mood... ;)

THANKS AND LOVE SIR SOME UPDATE ON SU 75 IF POSSIBLE

My neighbor doesn't threatened me with a ballistic missile no thank you 😂😂😂😂😂🤟🤟🤟🤟🤟

Once you are spotted 600 miles away from a S500 system, it’s over.

I didn't know I was waiting for it!

Need one this Christmas

Make a detailed video on Arrow 3, it is potentially one of the best ballistic missile defence systems in the world like THAAD or even THAAD ER, but with a fraction of the time and cost required but with very simple yet the best kill vehicle technology I've seen online thus far. Arrow 3 is dangerously capable but underrated.

@redakteur3613

2 жыл бұрын

@Agnieszka Kowalcyzk no S-300 shooted down anything in Syria. It’s Buk. Have you ever seen how Saudi Arabia uses its M1A2C tanks? After watching such videos I won’t be surprised if the fish in Gulf will sink their fleet

Respect to the cosmonauts flying on these rockets to space. Doesn’t look too safe.

@thomassimeon3138

2 жыл бұрын

No Rockets ever used to take humans in space are safe, what's your point? Though Russian rocket engines are considered the best in the world, even the u.s used them for there space missions

@TheWorldEnd2

2 жыл бұрын

@@thomassimeon3138 The joke ------------------------------------------> _________________You______________

@vadrak6197

2 жыл бұрын

Doesn't look safe? lol Soyuz is the most safe system in the world for transporting men into orbit. And US still using russian rocket engines for their space program.

@themax9913

2 жыл бұрын

@@vadrak6197 Not anymore since SpaceX use its own manufactured engines on their own boosters & vehicles, and they did transport astronauts & spationauts (european counterpart) to the ISS.

@graniteamerican3547

2 жыл бұрын

for anyone who cant get the joke, hes calling the s-500 a spaceship. implying that there is a man inside piloting it. it doesn't look safe because its a missle.

I know how the system really works. Russia developed a stare amplifier. Think of it like a megaphone for facial expressions. So the S-500 detects a threat and then Vladmir Putin stares into the amplifier. Anything is immediately deterred. Planes, missiles, comets. It's been said that entire air armada's just crash as a result.

@sjwarialaw8155

2 жыл бұрын

Can't argue against that. Sounds like it could be true.

@dunneemofozilla4596

2 жыл бұрын

Putin still has a lot to live up to. S400 have Stalinium warheads, no one's ever invented Putinium yet

Everything has a counter. And, everything Russia builds is suspect to the myriad of results that are possible from their huge budgetary constraints. peace

It would also be worthwhile knowing what radar band the radar uses. Though I don't expect the Russians are likely to share that information any time soon.

The S-500 is using a new type of warhead: A so called cope-head 🥸🤭

Last time I was this early, Hitler had just invaded the USSR

Its just a bigger version of 9М82МВ "высотная" (of old с-300 system) - 77Н6-Н rocket. And its only against hypersonic targets. Its way too expensive to target f22/f35 or cruise missiles. С-300в4 was supposed to do all that. Back in USSR they planned to shoot down space bombers with speeds of 9-11-13km/s. So С-500 its a very very long and very old story.

Now we just need to see if it actuakly exist in numbers large enough to field it or just ge another t14 or their 5th gen fighter jet

US: Don't you dare do it TURKEY: Start's mass production of the new S-500

@billwhoever2830

2 жыл бұрын

I know that this is a meme but Russia doesnt allow anyone to build their SAMs under license, not even China. The funny part is that the main SAMs of China are copied and later improved Russian s300 missiles.

@Ariez05

2 жыл бұрын

@@billwhoever2830 Turkey and Russia already agreed that Turkey will do (Joint-production) of the S-500 search it up

@timnik3570

2 жыл бұрын

@@Ariez05 Это ложь. Россия не будет продавать С500 пока не будет С600 и производить и делиться технологиями тем более.

@Mike-rt1vh

2 жыл бұрын

@@Ariez05 turkey is a poker face

What most of these armchair Generals forget is that stealth is designed to BREAK THE KILL CHAIN, not make the aircraft invisible to radar (which is impossible). The kill chain is the sequence of events and steps necessary for a SAM system to detect, acquire, identify, track and reliably guide a missile to it's target. If ANY of the kill chain steps fail, the target escapes unharmed or undetected. The F22 and F35 are both designed to be very good at breaking the kill chain for current and future SAM systems, and the S-500's radar is no exception.

@badcampa2641

2 жыл бұрын

It will fill a defence hole or relieve multiple older systems i dont agree with the razmataz

@malokegames

2 жыл бұрын

And for countering that there is the SU-57 concept, with a complete different doctrine of operation than the F22/35s despite the usual comparisons by armchair Generals. The ideia is that the Su-57 is networked with the S-400/500 to protect an area from these western stealth fighter, making it not a stealth fighter but rather an anti-stealth figther. It's known that the long wave frequency radars can detect (not track) these figthers, but then this information is passed to the airbones Su-57s throught network and they can focus their radars energy on these specific areas instead of dispersing throught wide angles and this will allow to track these fighters within much greater range, enought to start engagement in the borders of the no escape zone of air-air missiles. It's a complex task, but these networking can allow the job to be done by integrated algoritms and AI, making the sukhoi pilot just a platform operator. That's where the real complexity of these S-400/500 systems are.

@themax9913

2 жыл бұрын

@@malokegames Well, actually, the Su-57 doctrine of usage is fundamentally the same as that of the F-22 (or at least as it was planned, while the F-35 or B-2 were intended to penetrate hostile airspace), both are meant to be operated in an IADS network and do interception jobs that normal air defense cant do efficiently. Your point with large wavelength and the extent of Russian IADS (of which S-400/S-500 are only components) is indeed true and that’s indeed a domain where the Su-57 could shine better than the F-22 since it is supported by a better furnished IADS network than that of the US (which lack the quantity in their homelands despite having a good quality).

@Sajuuk

2 жыл бұрын

@@malokegames Again, it all depends on the ability of the S-500 and the SU-57 to detect, track and guide missiles onto targets without becoming targets themselves. The SU-57 does not possess enough stealth to act in the manner which you have described without being detected. Furthermore, as soon as it uses it's radar to try resolve long-wave information passed to it by other radars it would be easily detectable, even by 4thGen fighters. This goes for SAM systems using their radars too. This is why breaking the chain is so important, and why the F22 and F35 excels at it. The S-500 might be a very good system but keep in mind the Americans intend on confidently using F35s until the year 2060. That should give you an idea of how effective it is.

@malokegames

2 жыл бұрын

@@Sajuuk As I said, focusing the Su-57 radar waves to the spot indicated by the long wave radars will make it able to track and guide missiles, it does not have the intention to be "stealth" but to hunt these stealth figthers. And as you said, as soon as the F-22/35 uses it's radar to engage the Su-57 (which they would rather avoid) it would be imediately detectable by the Su-57 or 4thGen fighters in support. I think you still did not understand the russian networking concept involving S-400 and Su-57s. Oh, and don't forget that confidentiality is the repice for failiure, that's just propaganda bs and not what really guides military decisions.

Finally , I was waiting this video

I'll buy one these systems to use in my backyard.

Interesting video, but it failed to summarize the true meaning of the S500, which is an additional system principally designed to work in tandem with earlier models the likes of S400, S300, and even other types of Russian defense systems, so when it is analyzed on its own it is bound to miss the full potential of such powerful designs, probably with the added bonus of keeping the West guessing what they are facing, or would be or not, in case of full spectrum conflict... Good luck with that !

@keithadams812

2 жыл бұрын

This system is great until it's turned on... But I wouldn't stand near it for too long

S-500 was designed to defeat middle range missiles at first place

This is so good! I just ordered mine for home defense.

S-500 will work with S-350 vitiez & pansir 1 or S400 to cover all bases

Nice next month s-500 plus then in another month s-500 ultra.

@JohnMaxGriffin

2 жыл бұрын

They’ll produce 8 missiles, take some pictures/video of them all in the same place, and then announce development of the S-600

@userjlj

2 жыл бұрын

i thought the next one will be the S22? that's quite a leap.. lol

@r.p5380

2 жыл бұрын

@@JohnMaxGriffin probably manufacture around 100 systems and set them up around Moscow and areas in Siberia

@chieftainofthemoroccosindi1685

2 жыл бұрын

@@JohnMaxGriffin No, you don't understand. S-300, S-400, S-500 is a designation of no more new weapons. This is an encrypted designation of the distances at which the complex is capable of conducting reconnaissance, etc. For example, the Russian "Pantsir" is designated as S1 Pantsir S1 is a short-range AA defense. Now they have the Pantsir S1M, this is a late modification of it. In the USSR, they tried to create the S-500 (we are talking about the distance) back in the 60s as a strategic stationary weapon. Today, for Russia, the S-500 is just a portable tactical weapon. The S-500 Almaz-Antey began to design it from scratch in 2002, during which time a huge number of prototypes were modernized many times).

Russia: comes out with a new weapon system. Covert Cabal: it is shit and cannot do anything, btw American has something better or they are adding capabilities.

@CosmicValkyrie

2 жыл бұрын

I'm sure you already know this is all propaganda.

@guestimator121

2 жыл бұрын

+Thịnh Nguyễn Quang Your impression from watching this video is that Covert Cabal thinks this system is shit?

@bnnnnnnnnnnn

2 жыл бұрын

TBH screw them both

@TheSnarkyViking

2 жыл бұрын

Huh? If anything this channel tends to overstate Russian and Chinese capabilities and understate those of the US

@ShivaTD420

2 жыл бұрын

Yeh it's bunk propaganda, bout the only thing we know for sure is how dangerous they are to civilian aircraft.

What happens if you shoot one of the radar dishes with a anti material sniper rifle?

S500 is cute but you can't fool physics. F35 flying low is untrackable due to earth curvature and stealth until it is a bit too late for S500. Also they can be easily overwhelmed by decoys. So nothing special when it comes to real full-blown war.

The S10000 is already here. It goes into the Future to check what happens then returns to undo the past.

If it was so true why Russia isn’t in control of Ukrainian 🤔🤔🤔

I had no idea the GBI was that large

Actually, in my opinion, the same type of S-500 missile is tested in Kazakhstan steppe but in mines.

@user-uv3hd6bm6p

2 жыл бұрын

Нет. В Казахстане Нудоль испытывали. Загугли про неё.

Make a video on the F18 Growler up against Russia’s air defences.

@TheJoeSwanon

2 жыл бұрын

@Drew Peacock I wonder if the electronic warfare suite on a B-52 is comparable to the growler?

@mitrovdan

2 жыл бұрын

Maybe covert "butt hurt" cable can make a video explaining to you how the Iranians took over america's top notch Sentinel drone in mid flight and landed it on their airbase. I know such news doesn't get the deserved attention cause it really showed how good the US army is but again, maybe CC can do a video on this matter, bett the Growler would make the Russians go crazy.... without a doubt

These "S" missiles are the reason why america couldn't fine oil in Russia although its plenty over there

@maidatenpulamea

2 жыл бұрын

And yet a German light plane landed in Red Square making a joke of what, at that time, was the most protected airspace in the world. Trusting russian products is a countdown to failure.

@peaceiriere2418

2 жыл бұрын

@@maidatenpulamea Delusional Troll

@maidatenpulamea

2 жыл бұрын

@@peaceiriere2418 go troll the history books u bluepill. The truth will set you free.

It's possible that I've missed all of the successes of the S-400, but the most intensive battleground to evaluate the S-400 has been Syria. True there are a number of nations flying missions into Syria: the US, Turkey, Israel, UK, and others and so Russia doesn't want Syria shooting down NATO aircraft even if they are attacking targets in Syria. But I have to believe that Syria would shoot down Israeli aircraft conducting missions within Syria. Interestingly, the S-400 hasn't (at least publicly) shot down anything despite many missile and air attacks within Syria. Syria has claimed shooting down US, UK, French, etc. inbound missiles, but Syria doesn't claim it was done with S-400's. There have been one or two Israeli aircraft shot down, but not within Syrian airspace and the pilots survived, but I have to assume that if it was an S-400 that Syria would have made that a big deal. They didn't. So, maybe Russia has put strong restraints on Syria on how and when they use the S-400. Or maybe the S-400 isn't what it was cranked up to be. We (the public) don't know. What we do know is that Israel has flown F-35's into Iran (presumably as a test of their air defenses) and were not detected. We know that Israel has used its F-35's to strike targets in Syria. Again, I have to believe that Russia would want to shoot down an F-35 to get all of its technology. So, like the video, I'm left with wondering if the S-500, which I assume is very capable and likely more effective, is more hype like S-400 than reality. The S-400, at least in a very political context, hasn't lived up to its hype. The S-400 is in operation in many countries, but except for Syria it has not been tested in combat. And in Syria if it is supposed to shoot down hostile aircraft, it hasn't demonstrated it. The only real hostile air strikes in Syria are from Israel, and the S-400 hasn't stopped them.

@krisreddish3066

2 жыл бұрын

Most nations over hype military stuff. Us too. Not like Russia does. It is easier when all the media is state media in the nation. Though China hypes stuff that is not even possible. I still remember a cold ray rifle the state media was talking about in China. At least someone has a sense of humor in China is how I took it. In the US we hype up something before it is done, then cancel it . :P

This is scary, yet impressive.