Damn... A defense channel that actually knows something about defense. I think thats a first.

@jasminsekic3758

5 жыл бұрын

south front check it out

@Sol_Invictus510

5 жыл бұрын

Jasmin Sekic south front is great! Also love how they have great info and it isn’t omg we’re are the best cause we are the west channels.

@rolandlee6898

5 жыл бұрын

@SkyFoxAira Well, granted you can endlessly dissect and elaborate in detail all the intricacies of air defense, but that wasnt his point in this video. The point was to explain what SEAD is and he did a decent job of giving a quick simplified idea about it to those who dont know better, without making any major mistakes or showing a blatant bias. And at the very least he spent the 5 minutes needed to get some basic info right, which is a lot more than most other defense channels will do. Hence me giving him credit for it. The specific layout of ground based air defense systems is irrelevant and he does mention they overlap and are all part of an integrated network. ECCM is also mentioned.

@wijayaj001

5 жыл бұрын

And no robotic sound narrator.

@hansjorgkunde3772

5 жыл бұрын

@@mindsmirror While not false its not mentioning the capability of a S-300 system to work as a radar array. As they constantly exchange their radar data any command section know what the other see. Radar arrays are nasty, you have to take out all or you'll be shot down anyway...

No speech synthesizer. Yes!

@petlahk4119

5 жыл бұрын

Drachinifel switched away from using a synthesizer recently and his channel exploded. A youtube channel may offer quality content but most people aren't going to take it seriously or even enjoy watching it if it's using a synthesizer.

@tibchy144

5 жыл бұрын

@@petlahk4119 most focus on the messenger instead on the message, present a nice package and you can sell bullshit

@neurofiedyamato8763

5 жыл бұрын

@@tibchy144 Synthesizer can be pretty distraction and for some non-native speakers, hard to understand. You bring a good counter-arguments but I think it is understandable as to why such channels aren't as well liked.

@septia101

5 жыл бұрын

@@tibchy144 People buy into people!

@tibchy144

5 жыл бұрын

@@septia101, well said

*watches all the videos on this channel* i'm basically a general now

@DaniboyBR2

4 жыл бұрын

You're more informed than the average Venezuelan general thats for sure.

@tranceman9670

4 жыл бұрын

Agreed lol

@moneymandan6217

4 жыл бұрын

🤣🤣🤣

@galapagoensis

4 жыл бұрын

Lol

@manictiger

4 жыл бұрын

I've beaten all the campaigns in Wargame: Red Dragon. Obviously I'm a strategic genius. Let me command the Middle East! I'll show you how it's done!

I like how you said “anti radiation missile” multiple times before shortening it to “arm” that way people have more time to understand what arm means

@crystalballfantasy9382

5 жыл бұрын

Its - Harm

@PabloGonzalez-hv3td

4 жыл бұрын

@@crystalballfantasy9382 - A HARM is a type of ARM

@DarkShroom

4 жыл бұрын

oh that's what arm means

@GuinessOriginal

3 жыл бұрын

Radiation or radar?

@internetrules8522

3 жыл бұрын

@@GuinessOriginal Radiation. Radar waves are a type of radiation, anything on the electromagnetic (E.g: Infrared, Microwaves, Ultraviolet, Visible light, 5G towers, AM/FM Radio, Radar) is a type of radiation. the type of radiation that can actually cause cancer and cause radiation poisoning is called "ionizing radiation", 90% of the time someone says radiation, they mean ionizing radiation, but the actual term "Radiation" its much broader. so Anti-Radiation-Missiles are probably optimized for radars in general, but could probably even be used to target enemy communications like radios.

14:39. “He’s always watching!” Lol

@rubayetantu5841

4 жыл бұрын

Shit maan... you made my day

When discussing the AGM-88, remember that the E version has a multi mode seeker to enable it to hit non emitters. It also has a point to point GPS/INS mode for near precision vs time critical fixed or semi mobile targets. The latter capability I believe was first added to.the last pre AARGM HARM variant. Near precision with an air burst frag warhead of that size would work well against SAM sites, comms facilities, TBM launchers etc.

When you think about it, a lot of yeeting is involved in SEAD.

@TactualSLAYER

5 жыл бұрын

TheSleepingInsomniac truly next level thinking

@clippedwings225

5 жыл бұрын

I mean, you are yeeting missiles, drones, at a SAM that is yeeting radar waves that yeets a missile when the radar waves are yeeted back from an aircraft that is yeeting air to move.

@flyhigh6047

5 жыл бұрын

pressing the BIG RED BUTTON "Yeet!!"

@cp3fiu

5 жыл бұрын

Just imagine, eventually there's going to be a president to enter office who was young enough when yeet was super mainstream. So we may actually get a pres who yells "YEEEEEET" at the start of ww3

@briana5444

5 жыл бұрын

LockYourDoors LYD I will fucking nut when that happens

A nice and informative video to watch before going to bed. Comprehensive and informative.

@Ishaq_Vally

5 жыл бұрын

Videos are too long though. I think 9-13 minutes are perfect timeframe

@molnibalage83

5 жыл бұрын

With many inaccuracies. You can find here better stuff here. www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php/topic,30034.msg324404.html#msg324404

@johnny1992black

5 жыл бұрын

just to forget all about it when you wakeup... really informative

@yagyugaming2525

5 жыл бұрын

@@johnny1992black If you wake up tomorrow isn't guaranteed

@johnny1992black

5 жыл бұрын

@@yagyugaming2525 i dont sleep buddy so i dont wake up so this means that you can go fuck yourself

Love your channel man. Keep up the good work.

War is a very complicated serious business.

@Puzzoozoo

5 жыл бұрын

War is a collection of fleas all fighting to decide which one owns the dog.

@Singular121

5 жыл бұрын

@@Puzzoozoo Hahaha good one.

@Quantum-Bullet

5 жыл бұрын

And a lot of money (and power) involved.

@Powerofriend

5 жыл бұрын

@@Quantum-Bullet the arms industry is a leech, tolerated by the nation it saps strength from, at great expense, for the fear of a day it will need the poison the monster provides.

@MrBen527

4 жыл бұрын

Yep

I see military instructors playing this video in class as an introduction to the subject.

@PantsofVance

5 жыл бұрын

Former military analyst, I thought the same thing. Very knowledgable

@PantsofVance

5 жыл бұрын

@@randysearle2702 The last line pretty much summed it up, thanks.

@neovo903

5 жыл бұрын

I did see 2:02 some AGM-88 HARMs hitting some Sa6 Launchers and not the radar but oh well

@gharretje

5 жыл бұрын

​@@randysearle2702 You're speaking about 10:40, did you really think he was talking about this very video and not, maybe another one he did? Way to miss the point. That video is /watch?v=fBLHZwEXKeA btw.

@WheelsRCool

5 жыл бұрын

@@randysearle2702 The reason he says he is not going to bother going into how this is done is because he made another video that goes into detail on how it is done. And yeah, of course an 18 minute video is not going to make anybody an expert in the subject, people are not stupid. That would be like watching an 18 minute video on say how microprocessors work and then you saying that it doesn't make you an expert on microprocessor design.

Always a pleasure to view your videos. Professionally done and makes complex military systems understandable to the general public. Cheers

Another very well thought out and constructed video. Thank you.

i especially love and appreciate these extended, detailed videos. thank you for your hard work.

Dang. Where has this channel been my whole KZread life? Awesome video, subbed and can't wait to power watch your library!

I love your videos man! Very high quality.

@laetrille

5 жыл бұрын

@Curly whirly probrably a dude

@valerie80yearsago90

5 жыл бұрын

@@laetrille actually, nope. I'm indeed a gal'! But hey, I like learning. 🤷‍♀️

@totallyrandom3963

5 жыл бұрын

Do u have insta lol

@farzana6676

5 жыл бұрын

@Joe Ç She looks way too dark skinned to be Russian. Looks latino.

@farzana6676

5 жыл бұрын

@Joe Ç Too dark plus.google.com/photos/114010419872579390243/albums/profile/6492843034051371810?iso=false

Informative and unbiased... I am shocked, in a good way though!

that was an extremely informative update. i'd say the pendulum favors the defenders now. fast, stealthy UAVs being the equalizer to be pushed later. never mind; the nuclear danger is all-encompassing.

Thanks for the video bro. No voice synth Vids are the best. Interesting subject! Love your work, keep it up

7:20 I could immediately tell it's the Suwon AFB around my hometown.

How about the video on Beyond Visual Range air combat?

@IR-xy3ij

5 жыл бұрын

@jet guy It's still a critically important capability, as it allows for you to kill beyond your adversary's reach

@whitelabrat

5 жыл бұрын

Jet Guys is right though. There is a lot of interesting theory on BVR but not a lot of practical experience. It just has not been done much in actual combat. It looks pretty good on paper and in testing but no one really knows how effective it will be. Thank god we have never put the doctrines of the US and Russia to the test yet, but as of now they are the 2 primary doctrines. So far the US has gone primarily with a single missile type and using it in multiples to ensure kills. 1 is OK, 2 better, 3 if it absolutely has to die. Since the seekers are all the same type and software 3 is your 99% kill rate with very good missiles. 2 missiles is about a 92% kill rate and one drops you to something like 75% assuming best performance (i am being really generous, weapons like the AIM-120D do not have a 75% success rate). Anything you do that degrades a single AIM-120D's accuracy is likely to be effective against the others in a volley which goes a long way to degrading performance against sophisticated opponents. But... it means uniform hard points and shapes that can easily be planned around in aircraft development (think internal bays on a stealth aircraft). Russian doctrine is different. They use a wide variety of seekers with different software suites which they use in in groups of 3 to 4. They think, in testing, they have a much better kill ratio against modern counter measures this way. Some of the seekers are for instance designed to home in on the electronic jamming you would want to use against a radar guided seeker in the same volley. Disadvantages are they are not uniform in size, different range, and some times have very specific limitations. Some of this has evened out over the years. It also means your average Flanker can be configured to carry 8 to 12 BVR missiles fired in groups of 3 or 4. This becomes expensive fast. This is just the basics of doctrine but no one really knows if any of it works and there is a lot more going on than just what I outlined. Pretty much all of it is theory. We know much more about modern SAM systems and how effective they are than we know about AAM's and that is still not that much. Honestly I could tell you more about the difficulties that probably face modern stealth aircraft penetrating a 1st world integrated defense grid than I can tell you about the effectiveness of modern 1st world air to air combat. It is all just theory.

@ackwebde

4 жыл бұрын

@jet guy Thank you - great read!

@junkersintutus4282

4 жыл бұрын

@jet guy Indeed, but I imagine that a real shooting war these days between modern air combatants will see BVR A2A combat attempted in earnest.

@mcgeufer

4 жыл бұрын

@jet guy Well, I do agree BVR kills are rare. But does that mean BVR tactics are bad/not working? Even if you don't kill hat the target that approaches you from 30+ km, you force it to go defensive. That gives you time and allows you to work on your position and attack. And it puts stress on your enemies. So I still see it as valuable.

The antiradar missiles came before the Wild Weasels and where carried on regular aircraft. The Wild Weasels came about when it was realized specialist units where needed for SEAD as well.

@AgentSmith911

5 жыл бұрын

*were

@PATTHECATMCD

5 жыл бұрын

Anti-radar weapons were developed by Nazi Germany. Gliders, not missiles. But same principle - lock on to the radar, home on emissions. The snag with Shrike was that it had to be preset to a particular radio band before take off. Electronics were bulky in those days.

@johnc8910

5 жыл бұрын

@@PATTHECATMCD : Not a real problem. EVERYBODY uses standard radar bands. All you need to know is what kind of radar you are attacking. ELINT can tell you that.

@PATTHECATMCD

5 жыл бұрын

@@johnc8910 it's a different set of problems now with concepts like LPI, FH and synthetic aperture scannaed arrays. It was a problem in the time period that was raised (initial introduction of Wild Weasel specialist SEAD aircraft).

@johnc8910

5 жыл бұрын

@@PATTHECATMCD :LPI and synthetic aperture scanning is not used in SAM radars. No need.

woah this is some detail and research in this channel! well done, refreshing

Dude I love your videos keep up the good work 👍

I love this channel, it feels like a warm hug

14:39, Putin is always watching...

Covert cabal and Defense updates you two are my favorite channels that cover this topic.

love the new graphics as usual spectacular knowledge on the subject.

Easily the best channel for anything about military. Love that you don't use some text-to-speech program and research before you post videos. I hope more people notice your channel.

14:56 how can you command SAM batteries, when your colleague to your left looks like that ?

@MusicForTheBroken

5 жыл бұрын

I would command the fuck out of those radar thingies to get to her thingies

@jurisprudens

4 жыл бұрын

In Russia we have an (offensive) word for hot chicks in important positions - "soska". Meaning, a "sucker". ;)

@junkersintutus4282

4 жыл бұрын

Be a mature adult.

@marcusrat4466

4 жыл бұрын

@@junkersintutus4282 Yes my adult part is in a really "mature" stage after seeing those women

Very well made video. Explained with very informative way which keeps you watching till the end being interested all time.

My favorite channel. Keep em coming

Very well done. A video the average person can understand

sweet been binge watching all night

@OrganizationOfFreeNations

5 жыл бұрын

jsmpsnn same lol..

@dezzjays9568

5 жыл бұрын

Idiot

@jackie520

5 жыл бұрын

@@dezzjays9568 um why?

@Ethorbit

5 жыл бұрын

Real Content Shut the fuck up, kid.

you are so good at this. honestly, well done.

Good reports as always brother.

best channel

14:41 Putin pictures everywhere :D

@stephan6113

5 жыл бұрын

I was about to say the same thing

New sub! Thank you for the consistency!

Excellent video as always.

Boy, here come the 14 y/o 4 star generals

Do a video on the Bosnian guy that shot down the NATO/ us pilot over Bosnia by turning his SAM radar on and off to avoid detection but was still able to predict the pilots course. LEGENDARY

@ericclausen6772

Жыл бұрын

Yeah this channel doesn't cover crap or lies that plane got hit by flak

Excellent video, well presented, a real voice and great history. Bravo.

Brilliant round up bud.. Keep it up

It literally spells DEAD and dude pronounces it DEED...wut?

@FebiMaster

4 жыл бұрын

Alecxace Because it’s an abbreviation instead of a full word

@Willy_Tepes

4 жыл бұрын

@@FebiMaster It does not get more "abbriviated" than DEAD.

@timk.1395

4 жыл бұрын

@@FebiMaster It is an acronym.

@LeonnexFrost

4 жыл бұрын

its actually pronounced SEE-ad and DEE-ad if the mw2 advisors did their job

@hongo3870

3 жыл бұрын

Do you pronounce read like red?

you didn't mention the use of decoys to protect against ARMs wich is the use of generally 3 emitters wich confuses the ARM and allows for the continuous use of the radar system

@johnc8910

5 жыл бұрын

It would take a pretty sophisticated decoy emitter to spoof even a semi-smart ARM.

@CovertCabal

5 жыл бұрын

Dang!! Forgot!

@neurofiedyamato8763

5 жыл бұрын

@@johnc8910 But they exist, just like how missile-drones that mimic aircrafts, there are small emitters mimicking radars, SAM, and communication sites. Of course they are going to need to be sophisticated to distract a sophisticated opponent

@LjubomirLjubojevic

5 жыл бұрын

@@johnc8910 Yugoslav Army used (modified?) microwave ovens as decoys in 1999 NATO aggression on Yugoslavia. Radars would be turned on for only 10 seconds and then microwave in close proximity of radar vehicle would be turned on to redirect any radiation missiles. If has been 20 years ago, so I guess radiation missiles evolved beyond that.

@eduwino151

3 жыл бұрын

Countries like America and Israel now posses missiles with loitering capabilities that can confirm a target before a final supersonic dive to take it out

Great vid, good info! Aggressor back & forth to the defender, but he who outspends the other is the winner $$$!

That a lot of good stuff here, very great work man

no computer voice love it....can you make a video of the zumwalt??/ at 14:41 a picture of putin lol

@Conserpov

5 жыл бұрын

A picture of US president in every fucking govt office in US - "perfectly normal, nothing to see here. Patriotism, yay!" A picture of the Queen EVERYWHERE in the Commonwealth - "duh?" A picture of Russian president in a Russian govt office - "LOL! Cult of Putin!"

@talltale9760

5 жыл бұрын

Conser pov you seem to be overreacting lmao

14:38 Why do they have Putin's picture on the wall?

@NiumeLTU

5 жыл бұрын

So he could always see them working, no slacking in mother Russia.

@Puzzoozoo

5 жыл бұрын

For the same reason US sites have Benjamin Netanyahu's picture on the wall, to remind them who they really work for.

@noPCtoday

5 жыл бұрын

@@Puzzoozoo I don't agree with your opinion but that's a funny remark. Cheers mate and have a nice day :)

@markbradley6335

5 жыл бұрын

Because TrumpanZee is Putin's weiner cleaner. MAGA My Advisor Got Arrested

@iamunamed5800

5 жыл бұрын

@@Puzzoozoo Just like what the other guy said, not my actual opinion but made me laugh lmao

Well done video. Good job!

Never disappointed! Another great video!

14:55 and 15:01 - Russian Air Force chicks!! Russian girls!! Yay!! 💓 🐦 😁

@FusionC6

5 жыл бұрын

I noticed that too! HELLO!

@trollmcclure1884

4 жыл бұрын

They were called sirens. You better cover your eyes and put wax in your ears. You look at them for too long and you are lost. Weakness will make you an easy target for some Ivan.:)

@jillvalentinefan77

4 жыл бұрын

That's how they get ya. Russia will not hesitate to blind us with tits instead of nukes.

@TwixSvK

4 жыл бұрын

Russian girl will call the sead aircraft thru radio and ask them to go away

@videoepicreviews8437

3 жыл бұрын

@@jillvalentinefan77 well said saddam hussein

OH YEAH YEAH

@ManofCulture

5 жыл бұрын

OH YEAH YEAH

@ausaskar

5 жыл бұрын

I never asked for this.

@emigdiogreen7439

5 жыл бұрын

@@ausaskar I did. Oh yeah yeah

Great job covering the SEAD mission.

Your videos are great. Keep up the excellent work!

human voice, yea.... well explain.👍

A very nice video. Thanks for putting this together. However you have missed a couple of key points about this whole cat and mouse business between AD and SEAD . Firstly a modern military can HIT BACK at your launch platforms as well. I'm not just talking about shooting back at the aircraft that's launched the HARM BUT shooting at the airfield or AC where the plane took off from. Secondly the defender can use decoys to lure the anti-radiation missiles away. Also I note you mentioned Libya and Iraq's IADS. While in theory they were integrated they were never intended to stop raids of hundreds of aircraft. Also there is a common misconception that the Iraqi AD was a Soviet system. Yes there were Soviet components but the actual IAD was built by the French and British. You can read more here: en.citizendium.org/wiki/Gulf_War,_Iraqi_integrated_air_defense_system

@hansjorgkunde3772

5 жыл бұрын

And most likely these systems had known weaknesses.... As Britain were part of the attacker it was most likely cake. To say the forces lost more planes due to mechanical failures and crashes in low altitude flights than actually against the air defenses.. I remember an order given that these kind of flights are suspended as no longer needed and too costly.

I don't remember what KZread rabbit hole I went through to find this channel. But I'm glad I did. Instant Sub.

This is a very good and informative video without any robotic voice. You've just earned my subs.

@BigSmartArmed

5 жыл бұрын

except that the author feed you a bunch of factually wrong information, but hey, eat up.

12:30 *the patriot is able to engage at very long ranges, ver small targets* lmao who would win: 200$ drone or 9 Million dollar missile (hint, this missile won)

Hi, can you make a video of Israel's chances of successfully bombing Iran's nuclear facilities without being shot down by SAMs? And return safely to Israel without losing any aircraft? Specifically the F-35. I think Iran has S-300 now.

@mickeyg7219

5 жыл бұрын

Binkov's Battlegrounds cover that (sort of), if Israel is attacking Iran's nuclear facilities, it'll most likely be done using ballistic missiles, it's much harder to defend against than aircraft and cruise missiles.

@rerbitd7094

5 жыл бұрын

Iran has at its disposal six types of complexes, from the old Soviet C-75 to Tor-1M. The most massive SAM of Iranian air defense is the American MIM-23 Hawk - there are more than one and a half hundred of them. Also recently began the production of its own "Shalamcha", created on the basis of "Hawk".

@rerbitd7094

5 жыл бұрын

Conor McGregor's Pool Noodle Are you just talking about attacking an independent country? Are you from USA ?

@pteppig

5 жыл бұрын

@@evilzarmy1 yea, it's pretty easy to destroy an AA site at visual range if it's not even active. They have shot down Turkish and Israeli Jets with pantsir before. Also, current upgraded f15 have few in common with an f15a0, Israel produces its own custom avionic upgrades. Probing the capabilities of a system during an actual engagement produces far more reliable information than just screaming "murrica" or "Russia"" and attacking what's basically a steel container. They WERE attacking the site preemptively, when it was offline, because they knew the location and had seen the capability first hand just days before.

@pteppig

5 жыл бұрын

Israels Chance at attacking nuclear enrichment sites and especially the power grid, are pretty good. They have good information on the sites and can use sub launched cruise missiles to take them out, without risking any fighters. But Iran also has a good chance at defending some targets against cruise missiles, if they have access to Russian ECM systems, like the ones used in Syria. The majority of the cruise missiles that were launched from the us destroyer against the airbase did not make it there. But, like in that example, every ECM or AA system can be saturated, even if they are informed of the attack before hand. And the ones that got through, hit their targets.

Excellent content. First video and was compelled to sub. Well done!

This is outstanding work!

It takes half a decade and a heap of money to teach a combat pilot. It costs several tons of gold to buy a combat airplane. Even if the costs do not bankrupt a nation (which they may), no one can afford to loose the pilots in any numbers, and what is worse, to the robots, what these rockets and systems are, in principle. The obvious way out are the combat drones, but if autonomous, they are going to be very stupid indeed, compared with a human pilot. Forget the AI stories. AI can only make what is abyssimally stupid, stupid only. The task of shooting down planes can be automated much more easily than a task of flying a combat aircraft with all of its multiple missions and situations in which to fight. Conclusion. I would prefer not being anywhere around in a modern all out war, and a fighter plane cockpit would be one of the worst places to occupy. Best idea? No war.

@socratesa2536

5 жыл бұрын

daseladi well drones will most likely remain piloted remotely, not controlled through AI. Ideas i’ve heard proposed for the future possibility of the aerial battle field would be to have one human pilot in lead of a flight of drone pilots. It’s much more ethically suitable in which there is a human out in the field having a more emotional connection to possibly bombing someone. It also, in the case you mentioned, allows for the drone planes to be disposable through many unique strategies. But it’s crazy to me that just taking out one aircraft is a huge detriment to a countries defense capabilities through cost, time, and moral. Two major powers facing each other is almost unpredictable today, it’ll be scary to take to the skies in a major war for sure.

Incorrect. Integrated S-75 sites did not just switch off radars during sead attacks, they blinked radars for guidance hand off capability. Such guidance was not accurate enough to assure reliable tracking, but it prevented sead missions from employing its stand off capability. In effect it was a stand off, with S-75 sites not willing to waste missiles, and WW not being able to track any given radar long enough to assure a strike. Overwhelming majority of successful air strikes on S-75 sites were conducted by low altitude attacks, that's why so many of the attacking aircraft were downed by AA fire rather then SAM fire. The very few successful sead strikes on S-75 sites were conducted against isolated S-75 sites that were manned by Vietnamese crews, while sites manned by Soviet crews did not suffer such losses. There is a reason as to why statistics of missile launches per target strike ratio varies so drastically between Soviet and Vietnamese crews. Soviet SAM systems did not become mobile due to sead attacks, they evolved into integrating mobility through implementation of higher order communication capability between command station, radar station and launchers. The author of this video does not know the basic organizational structure of Soviet SAM systems, specifically National Air Defense vs PVO defense. S-75 Dvina was designed as a semi-mobile system for National Air Defense, therefore its primary requirement was a robust, hard data link for deployment at prepared defense sites. Soviet mobile SAM systems were designed for PVO forces, for deployment at unprepared sites wherever ground forces required protection. This video is misleading and factually incorrect. ausairpower.net/APA-S-75-Volkhov.html www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/pvo-sv.htm

Congratulations on such a comprehensive presentation. I love and follow your channel as I consider it amongst the most reliable if not as the most reliable source of information in field which is saturated with hate, bias and fake information, many of which are acting as pure and totally unreliable and fake propaganda. You are demonstrating what should look like and to be the true professionalism in media. Thanks and all the best.

Great video man!

1:48 The Australian air force ensuring the death of one of their pilots

It's so funny to hear these intricate explanations of the capabilities of the Russian military with the hindsight being 20/20 and all. Russian advanced this, Russian world class leading that, with a specific emphasis on their advanced SAM systems that form the best IADS in the world.. Yeah right, Russia also has the world's second most powerful air force, their Army is second to none giving their advanced tanks and artillery support. And let us not forget the completely revamped command%control system pushed by the new generation of Russian professional soldiers who are led by the genius of hybrid warfare - general Gerasimov himself..... LOL... Russia will remain the world's laughing stock for a generation or two....

Intelligent analysis, enjoyed watching!

As per usual, another brilliant video.

the iron dome in Israel has worked well for years and now with stealth with small glid bombs and decoys Syria's S-300 won't really last long:)

@johnc8910

5 жыл бұрын

Iron Dome is designed to defend against MLRS-type unguided rockets. There's no reason you couldn't use them as a terminal defense for a SAM battery, but it has nothing to do with attacking one.

@shmeckle666

5 жыл бұрын

You sound like you’re out if your league mate. S-300s aren’t surface to surface missiles....?

@hansjorgkunde3772

5 жыл бұрын

The Pantir S is the close range protection against incoming missiles for the S-300. If they were able to destroy one there are a bunch others to do the job.. its not the main system. So the IDF achieved exactly nothing.

@RobertLock1978

5 жыл бұрын

He's too busy bending over.... ;D

@michaelalexander3078

5 жыл бұрын

Robert Bryant Lock 😂😂😂, well played sir!

Russian trolls be like........wait what? This stuff can't be correct. RT told us we were invincible. 😂😂

@jubeiorigami4096

5 жыл бұрын

Russia has Measures against Seads. Elextronic warfare and point defense systems again a saturated attack. Then there's always the option of attacking the platform launching the missiles.

@jubeiorigami4096

5 жыл бұрын

Funny how 99% of the 1000s of people that appear on RT are AMERICAN, BRITISH and other NON RUSSIAN EXPERTS AND SCHOLARS. they use RT as a PLATFORM to present information that US fake news media would keep under wraps.

@pacus123

5 жыл бұрын

@@jubeiorigami4096 Well done! People forget that a capable military can also attack the platforms launching the missiles.

@nworesistance9834

5 жыл бұрын

Can you provide a link to RT saying Russian army is superior to US or is invincible? Oh wait you cant cuase they never said that.

@whatdaheck9667

5 жыл бұрын

they are fools ,for every radar site and every launch vehicle we have 10 ballistics for ,its why they just talk sh!t instead of doing sh!t

Thank you,......probably the most comprehensive info I've received on this subject.

You make great vids. Thanks!

And still, the world accepts it when Russia pulls down a passenger plane ...

@komradekat3557

5 жыл бұрын

That was your CIA backed Ukrainians

@markbradley6335

5 жыл бұрын

Russia pulls down TrumpanZee's pants every damn day. He's Putin's BEACH

@laetrille

5 жыл бұрын

@@komradekat3557 Mmmmm no

@dmitrit.4862

5 жыл бұрын

Kerwin They‘re No. 1 in overthrowing governments and fighting wars.

@laetrille

5 жыл бұрын

@@GBR9794 "Because almost the entire world hate US" >>>This is objectively untrue and fallacious. Its an overgeneralization based on your own day to day interactions. American culture, food, technology, trends etc... are very popular around the world, this makes people at least open to the idea of the Unites States of America, i.e. they can sympathize. Sure many dislike the US as a whole because of out foreign policy but people who truly hate the US for what it stands for and just anything American in general are few and far in between when compared to the number of people who like the US.

It’s pronounced Sea Add. Just saying.

very informative and knowlegeable discussions, Well explained.

Excellent video! Very impressive. I subscribed.

All this wasted human potential.

@PwerRanger01

5 жыл бұрын

You do realise that most of todays tech advancements including the very computer or phone you wrote this message on has come from military research and development. War happens, it always has and always will. That saying "Those who want peace prepare for war" is shown to be accurate throughout history many times.

@oppotato5440

5 жыл бұрын

Where do you think gps came from

Very good, helped me with my tactics in CMANO Thanks 😀

Excellent videos man!

This is really good. Thanks!

Amazing video, thank you

Hi Cabal , a long time fan of you. 👍 highly appropriate your work.

Very good video presentation!!

Excellent video, very informative.

Good work with the video. Like it alot! Regards from Sweden

Excellent content

Great video!!

I really do enjoy your channel your very thorough

As usual a high quality video.

Amazing video!

I enjoy your work, thanks

amazing channel man.

Very informative nice videp great research

Right On Man!

brother your channel is great! full of information and you pass it in a very easy way to understand. Im serious you are the only channel that ive seen that does not join in politics subject as unfortunately happens in the similar channels from my country, you focus trully on information and this is awesome. please keep this very good work. thank you and best regards from Brazil

Im surprised. you're the 1st person on youtube to talk about military stuff that actually has a fair idea of what they are actually talking about, and was much more accurate than not.. also props for using DCS. its not perfect, but its the best non-classified thing out there.