Go check out kommandostore.com/covertcabal Sign up for their mailing list and get 10% off first order!

@captaindeliciouspants8315

2 жыл бұрын

awesome channel name

@michaelmontgomery5141

2 жыл бұрын

Tom Clancy was a sub driver. And, due to the accuracy of his stories, FBI investigated him

@michaelmontgomery5141

2 жыл бұрын

Oh yes, the basis of the MX race track missile.

@phdnk

2 жыл бұрын

chinese nukes seem to be few because the true number is unknown and is concealed

@GrendalTheBeasty

2 жыл бұрын

I was going to but then you said they don't offer Chinese nukes.

The best nuclear missiles are the whale friendly nuclear missiles.

@eamonwright7488

2 жыл бұрын

Nuke the whales, because ya gotta nuke something!

@mrwaleyko

2 жыл бұрын

@@eamonwright7488 kzread.info/dash/bejne/qIlt2dudfNuxdrQ.html

@RNS681

2 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/Zn2J2q2YYLqykso.html

@dahleno2014

2 жыл бұрын

We have the best nuclear missiles, they are such great missiles. They have theses boosters, such great boosters, they could fly to Pluto and back. Chyna should be afraid because we have the bestest missiles since the Roman Empire -Donald Trump

@Menaceblue3

2 жыл бұрын

@@eamonwright7488 *Japanese warmongering intensifies!*

I like that cute nuclear weapons picturebook with the environmental whale.

@zes3813

2 жыл бұрын

wrrr

@Menaceblue3

2 жыл бұрын

The Japanese call it *"Kawaii~♡"*

@downwithputinsaveukraine1313

2 жыл бұрын

China engineered a whale so that a nuclear tipped warhead could pop out of and be fired from it's blowhole.

@NoName-sb9tp

2 жыл бұрын

@@legalizerapingrussianbroad8299 i guess you have never been to russia? I don’t know how much experience you have with the Russian Army, but I assure you, they ain’t the paper tiger type. Saying Russian was never the superpower is telling everyone that US is just a small and back water country like Vietnam. It’s false. And why so few oligarchs? It’s simple: loyalty and money. They are the ones that made up 35% of the wealth in Russia, contribute greatly to it’s economy, in turns, built a strong army. If you insist that the us could waltz in and take the russian oil and timber so nonchalantly, ask the nazi why they couldn’t just do the same in 1942. The russian meal that you speak of are probably the IRPRUS 72H emergency ration, reserved only for emergency that they always sell on amazon. They are *strictly* for emergency. And you are supposed to eat them with water, or combine them with water to make porridge. What’s wrong with that? Even US emergency ration sometimes give you the same thing. If you have a chance going to the ARMY GAMES hosted by the russian, they will give you a chance to try the normal 24H ration. Tea, coffee, main dishes with meat, side dishes,… etc just like the US MRE, just a bit heavier.

@NoName-sb9tp

2 жыл бұрын

@@legalizerapingrussianbroad8299 oh, and the populace in russia is not as poor as you think. Vast majority of them have the same living standard as other countries in the west.

One year later: “Why does China have so many nuclear weapons?”

@moby1kanob

2 жыл бұрын

will never happen

@dasig3010

2 жыл бұрын

@@moby1kanob I doubt that. You really think everything they does it would be leak to the world? Grow up

@bjrnhjortshjandersen1286

2 жыл бұрын

I think they have rather few ..a few hundred enough to retaliate but not enough to do first strike.

@jordancarpenter4093

2 жыл бұрын

@@moby1kanob China already has 3000 nuclear nukes under ground according to the George town university and Harvard university!

@jordancarpenter4093

2 жыл бұрын

@@bjrnhjortshjandersen1286 China has 3 thousand nuclear nukes under ground according to the university of Georgetown and Harvard university!

“Enough is good Enough” -Sun Tzu

@elliot5203

2 жыл бұрын

@yiu yang oop, thanks doe :5

@baldwiniv5339

2 жыл бұрын

But also, Appear weak when you are strong -Sun Tzu

@user-wz6hw7gf3r

2 жыл бұрын

Have you seen Sun Tzu's Art of War?

@elliot5203

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-wz6hw7gf3r yeah:v

They publicly stated why thirty years ago; They didn't want to get into a three way nuclear arms race with USSR/USA. It's not a mystery like you frame it as.

@maccheese8379

2 жыл бұрын

Exactly

@interstellarsurfer

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah, but they're also famous liars, so... 🤷‍♂️

@Sakboi2012

2 жыл бұрын

@@interstellarsurfer what.

@antwango

2 жыл бұрын

@@interstellarsurfer LOL irony "Famous Liars" according to the West the real "Famous Liars" XD

@kronk420

2 жыл бұрын

@@interstellarsurfer Exactly! You must be an agent of the Chinese state to believe a word that they say!

China understands opportunity cost, thats why.

@justiron2999

2 жыл бұрын

It's like Mao said, "What if they killed 300 million of us? We would still have many people left." Also aside from Stali's Soviet Russia I doubt many or any nation would actually use a nuke especially on China.

@travian821

2 жыл бұрын

@@justiron2999 An US - China nuclear war would damage China more than the US,

@hermanwooster8944

2 жыл бұрын

@@travian821 Nobody wins in a nuclear war, but the US stands to lose more in such a conflict. The question really comes down to who has more hardened structures and how long could those structures last. That's a rather dark question and one that has only bad answers.

@travian821

2 жыл бұрын

@@hermanwooster8944 US has more nukes and is less densely populated, if for some reason a nuclear war occurred between the two US would "Win" and i think you understand well what does that mean. Binkov has a great video in this subject: kzread.info/dash/bejne/fouCpKmpnpeWebQ.html

@sunhuatom

2 жыл бұрын

@@travian821 I am sure Chinese are thinking the opposite.

As long as you have enough to deter, you have enough.

@lizadonrex

2 жыл бұрын

Because China are targeting US city. China deter is causing death toll in enemy nation as much as possible.

@lizadonrex

2 жыл бұрын

@Ярослав Л can you give me any documents stated US will first target Any city target Aka highly populated civilian area, when lunching a Nuclear counter attack?

@lizadonrex

2 жыл бұрын

@@Hello-ds1vc there is a different between targeting civilians and military targets

@musakazem2998

2 жыл бұрын

@@lizadonrex i never heard of such doctrine either but it does make sense. Considering Last time i checked Nagasaki and Hiroshima were cities, not military positions.

@lizadonrex

2 жыл бұрын

@Ярослав Л so you show me the plan USSR were attack military bases and US were only attacking civilians as targets, this is a complete opposite for what I know the weapons design for US military which is mainly target enemy military unit and infrastructure. You knowledge must come from somewhere, show me the source to proof that.

Pretty smart on the PLARF's part to maintain a minimal deterrence. They'll spend at most 10% of the budget relative to the US & Russia, while getting 99% of the benefits.

@shanetonkin2850

Жыл бұрын

Not necessarily, remember the part about your deterrent no longer being that effective if your adversary has enough nuclear weapons to hit every single one of yours at that same time in a surprise first strike?

@GMATveteran

Жыл бұрын

@@shanetonkin2850 The fact that the PLARF is rebuilding silo-based assets means that such a first strike is already no longer feasible. They would've only started mass silo deployment if they had a good enough early warning system in place to enable a counter attack prior to the first attacks landing.

That’s probably the first sponsorships iv ever watched where I instantly went to check them out

@Mewithabeard

2 жыл бұрын

Mate, I was gonna comment the same thing, definitely checking them out!

@vengeancewillbemine3440

2 жыл бұрын

First comment i seen , and true to the point 👉

@eustache_dauger

2 жыл бұрын

Too bad with ITAR

@Kunbeeb

2 жыл бұрын

saame

@adamgonzalez7450

2 жыл бұрын

Exactly. Same for me, I instantly signed up

"Nuke the whales?" "Somethin's gotta get nuked."

@weeguy52

2 жыл бұрын

Nelson calm the f*ck down🤣🤭👍

@deckardcain9789

2 жыл бұрын

Actual Nelson Quote, "Gotta nuke something."

@slslbbn4096

2 жыл бұрын

Fun fact: the US remains the only regime in human history to have used nukes on civilian population centers TWICE. Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Now imagine why that information is largely censored or rephrased in a much different way here in the US. That is propoganda

@prodigypenn

2 жыл бұрын

@@slslbbn4096 not sure what you learned in school, but I was taught this at least twice, during middle school and again in highschool

At their peak, Soviet and American built rate was 5,000 nukes a year, each. There’s no reason China can’t do this if the new cold war really gets bad.

@ebek4806

2 жыл бұрын

Mostly bombs. Now you need those warheads on missiles cruise and ballistic. To be as effective as possible

@Joe_Friday

2 жыл бұрын

If the US wanted to remain the sole nuclear super power they should have went to war with anyone that began building nuclear weapons. It's too late for that now.

@presidentelecta-10warthog44

2 жыл бұрын

@John Smith thats a ton of bass

@ebek4806

2 жыл бұрын

@John Smith Is type 096 even in service? From what I'm reading it is still under development.

@andrewgates9333

2 жыл бұрын

@@Joe_Friday had 7 more after vj-day. Should have taken out Moscow, stalingrad, and leningrad.

What they have is enough to make anybody regret an attack. Overkill capability is overrated.

@fluffly3606

2 жыл бұрын

@@ebek4806, There have been studies showing that ONE hundred (100) detonations could cause a global famine under likely war conditions. So no, what they have is enough.

@lolasdm6959

2 жыл бұрын

@@ebek4806 Ten nukes are already a effective minimal deterence.

@lolasdm6959

2 жыл бұрын

@@ebek4806 China does not need to deter anyone other than the US, Chinese minimal deterence does not require destorying the US.

@kimtau87

2 жыл бұрын

@@ebek4806 Chinese are not fools as many Westerners would always want to believe just to appease themselves. No one really knows how many warheads they have. It's all guess work and pentagon "intelligence". No one knows what is "sufficient for deterrence" in the Chinese scheme of things. They have been planning for war with America for along time. With the secretive developments of Hypersonic weapons, anti ship, and anti satellite missiles. Even if they got 10 warheads, i think nobody in NATO, not even America would want any 5 of them to land anywhere in their territory. War is destruction not a video game

@willrobinson9767

2 жыл бұрын

@@ebek4806 Super EMP warheads go out 1000 kilometers each... A handful would remove electricity and gasoline forever.... They don't have a shortage of warheads... One would probably take down the grid....

The pizza ad on the door is hilarious.

@NeverTalkToCops1

2 жыл бұрын

No, it is wholly obscene, sub human nonsense.

@BringTheRain

2 жыл бұрын

Ayyyy 007 fancy seeing you here lol

@TheOfficial007

2 жыл бұрын

@@BringTheRain you know it my man you know it.

@EpochSecutor

2 жыл бұрын

@@NeverTalkToCops1 Well who pissed in your coffee? Calling a joke, even one that's a bit morbid about nuclear war "subhuman" is a bit much.

6:17 and to show the truck concept was cool, they drew a Porsche 911 next to it...

@osamabinladen824

2 жыл бұрын

911 🤗❤️😁👌😍🐈

I'd love to see an episode about the Chinese Type 003 Aircraft carrier that is about to be finished. and the associated implications.

@user-rm9yi1mw5c

2 жыл бұрын

EPOCH TIMES HAS A WHOLE SERIES ON CHINA. THATS WHY CHINESE RAIDED AND BURNED DOWN THEIR PRINTING PRESSES

@DK-yz9xk

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-rm9yi1mw5c lmao who you kidding? epoch times is made by the disgusting falun gong cult. that was expelled from china. falun gong are on par with mormons and scientology in terms of their cult-like behavior and mad beliefs hahaha

@obsidianstatue

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-rm9yi1mw5c Just an honest and personal advice, do not ever trust the Epoch Times or any media that is affiliated with the falun gong. They are seriously the biggest generator of baseless fake news in the media landscape.

@NeuroScientician

2 жыл бұрын

@@obsidianstatue I assume you trust garbage from CCP, right? :D

@amiralavi6599

2 жыл бұрын

Me either, but with its conventional power unit, it would most likely be used to defend Chinese waters or participate in an unlikely Taiwan invasion. However, Type 004 (if built), would open their path to global power projection.

I love that Domino's Blast door 😁😎

@NeverTalkToCops1

2 жыл бұрын

Why? Obviously, you lack sophisticated thought processes.

@Hamsteak

2 жыл бұрын

@@NeverTalkToCops1 obviously you can't take a joke, and maybe you should move out of your moms basement

Unfortunately, hover craft, especially large heavy hover craft, have a lot of trouble travelling up-hill….so provided where they need to be deployed is fairly flat, no problem…but a hill between it and it’s location…problem…!! Unless there’s a way around it….

@demun6065

2 жыл бұрын

Fortunately for us, his idea failed and he became a writer.

@omnianti0

2 жыл бұрын

@@demun6065 all the movie and game with his name mentionned are utterly poor

@demun6065

2 жыл бұрын

@@omnianti0 Really? I just rewatched Hunt for the Red October, one of the best films of it's era, imo.

@omnianti0

2 жыл бұрын

@@demun6065 yeah again a movie about infiltration and personnal lory nothing related with the corps spirit but since thatstory is writed by loonely neird its natural

@jed-henrywitkowski6470

2 жыл бұрын

Kind of like most Americans. "To fat to fight" - A US Army Officer.

US: We have enough nukes to wipe you out 10 times over China: That's impressive. We only have enough to wipe you once

@fringeminority3224

2 жыл бұрын

If you honestly think that the Chinese are telling the truth about how many nuclear warheads they have then you are crazy. This is the CCP were talking about right?

@zihaozhang7177

2 жыл бұрын

@@fringeminority3224 No one tells the truth about how many nukes they have. You think the US's gonna tell you how many of them they have? Please...

@fringeminority3224

2 жыл бұрын

@@zihaozhang7177 nope I'm sure the u.s. is lying too ... but don't think the Chinese are lacking in nuclear warheads cuz I promise you they are not

@zihaozhang7177

2 жыл бұрын

@@fringeminority3224 "I'm sure..." How are you so sure? Where are you getting your information? Have you been to China or seen one of their war heads? I don't. And why would foreign intel sandbag China's power? Are the CIA unable to get a good estimate of how many war heads China has? Well, in that case that's too bad. Nukes are useless without effective carrying rockets. Under the same logic, a handful of successful detonations are all that's needed to destory a country. It's not about how many you can build, it's about how many your opponent can take.

@jeremytjong2595

2 жыл бұрын

​@@fringeminority3224 It's nukes we're talking about, they're a deterrent; if anything, countries such as China and Russia stand more to gain from inflating their actual numbers.

China is a more intelligent nation it seems

@elgodofcanaaniamwhoiam7649

2 жыл бұрын

100% agreed!!

@tforaodg

2 жыл бұрын

It always is. I used to work for a big engineering consulting company and worked in china for years. They do have some weird approaches for issues but Normally their ways work really well.

@Zerosen89

2 жыл бұрын

too bad they have the most evil government on the planet, they are just a more powerful wealthy version of North Korea

And those "silos" are actually foundations for wind turbine. Some "think tank" out there have lazy interns.

@user-to8wr4vv9z

2 жыл бұрын

You can never wake up people who pretend to be asleep, even though they are stupid.

@seagullskunk

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-to8wr4vv9z wumao

@farzana6676

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-to8wr4vv9z If you speak bad about CCP you get sent to laogai

@fatetestarossa2774

2 жыл бұрын

@@farzana6676 gulag equivalent ??

@farzana6676

2 жыл бұрын

@@fatetestarossa2774 Gulag equivalent except they still exist.

Good discussion of the disadvantages of road-mobile missiles.

Never heard of that environmental friendly nuclear missile before. Ahahah

I remember growing up in the northern Ozarks of Missouri we also had a large missile silo field based out of Whiteman air station. It was back before they were dismantled under START you could drive around and see quite a few of them directly from the road.

Greatly relieved & delighted you addressed this problematic issue, it's really been keeping my colleagues at Chinese takeaway awake all night 🌙!

I think the more relevant question is why do US/Russia have so many?

@buckhorncortez

2 жыл бұрын

Because there's no kill like overkill...

@jacksonteller1337

2 жыл бұрын

Second strike capabilities. If the enemy kills 60% of your strike capabilities in a first strike you can still retaliate. Killing most of the enemy war machine. China focused on first strike and the taking of land from neighbours. But now they too want to build up to a MAD equilibrium.

@nomercynodragonforyou9688

2 жыл бұрын

Cause they're stupid

They aren't Nuclear Silos, they are Renewable Energy Facilities!!!

@CovertCabal

2 жыл бұрын

Really? It must be the most highly secured renewable energy facility in the world then haha. Also the most ineffective, being that there are no windmills, no solar panels, no massive form of any sort of power generation whatsoever

@dragonstormdipro1013

2 жыл бұрын

@@CovertCabal People actually believe things that China says.....even with their history. Sighhh

@chinoonlim

2 жыл бұрын

Why don’t you zoom in to see? Show us the zoom in?

@eveleung8855

2 жыл бұрын

@@CovertCabal ROFL, please do your research and find out which genius in the world will build their nuclear silos A. on loose sand; B. so close to Mogao Caves - UNESCO World Heritage Center. Really?! 😂

@eveleung8855

2 жыл бұрын

@@dragonstormdipro1013 maybe because the Chinese has a habit of documenting every damn thing happens to them? Like the uncle's grandmother's cousin's granddaughter gave birth to a boy, or aunt Yuen's daughter wedding received $123,456 wedding fee in cash. etc., each clan will document their clan important event, government also document their important event, these records was written on bamboo stick and link with a string to form a roll of book like reading material, or craved on bronze object, these documents ware also bury in important people's grave such as high rank royalty/general /officer or emperor etc., every bits of Chinese ancient history can be verified by all these archology excavation finding. Don't feel sour if you don't have something like that.

Everybody gangsta until the whales hack our missile silos

You forget that land based track launchers always have a certain percentage on patrol, ready to fire from anywhere, any time

"It's the guy with one that I'm worried about" -Bill Cabot, The Sum of All Fears

@user-qw1er2ty3ui4o

2 жыл бұрын

Very nice reference.

I wait for your uploads every week. Always good content. India too has a nuclear triad btw and also a no first use policy (which might have been scrapped)

Two views on the nuclear armament and movement for peace. 1. The movement for peace for largely sponsored by the Soviets and actually accelerated the amount of ABC defences in Europe and USA. 2. The nuclear agreements were pushed by the US for the purpose of keeping the overview of war machinery with the least cost and securing the economy in case of a full scale war with the USSR.

Perhaps the Chinese took note of what Oppenheimer said in 1948 when asked how many nuclear devices the US needed. He observed that the US would soon have 40-60 nuclear devices which was more than adequate to destroy every major city in Europe and Asia so that was probably enough to deter. The US went on to build 30,000 nuclear devises of which a tiny fraction were ever deployed. The then Soviets managed to build 40,000. As Gorbachev famously told Margaret Thatcher this was enough to destroy Civilisation a thousand times over; ie, they could reduce the stockpile without wearing deterrent. Gorbachev and Reagan went to agree to do just that. The US and Soviets still have about a thousand operational nuclear devices. For what purpose would China want more than a few hundreds.

A wizard once said "What you wanted More?"

I wouldn't wanna bet the farm on what China has or doesn't have. Chinese are very capable opponents and skilled in the arts of illusion.

@clutchgaming3588

2 жыл бұрын

Until you realize their lactose intolerant

@LexlutherVII

2 жыл бұрын

More like masters on diseases.....

@Admiral_Jezza

2 жыл бұрын

"Chinese are very capable and skilled in the arts of illusion." -Sun Tzu

@NO-GAMES

2 жыл бұрын

@@Admiral_Jezza yeah, and that too.

@DK-yz9xk

2 жыл бұрын

@@LexlutherVII yet its the USA that has virus labs all over the world, wake up sheep

your sponser wants a person to register an account before they can even see what is on the site. I call BS.

Think the "chinese missile site" was just wind turbine foundations, and the story originated from some amateur satelite analyst who overreacted. Kind of stupid concentrating them in just one location such as that as well .

@matthewmcintosh4925

2 жыл бұрын

1. You aren't a satellite imaging analyst either so what you think is meaningless. 2. The photos shown were from civillian satellite's so you don't get to read the Beijing times over the workman's shoulder while he is having lunch. I.E. google earth. 3. These aren't the type of weapon that you fire one or two and see if your enemy has had enough, you fire them all then stick you head between your legs and kiss your ass goodbye. 4. Grouping them close together makes perfect sense for security, operational, and cost-effectiveness. Much easier to guard and defend 1000 km² than 10000km². 5. What benefit particularly in regards to cost do you think would result in placing wind turbines so far apart. Far more cost effective to place wind turbines as close together as possible.

@rbkkpooi3244

2 жыл бұрын

@@matthewmcintosh4925 dude, i can read chinese. you do know now they laughing in weibo (chinese FB) cause some stupid thinking that is a silo. 1, they nuke launching using DF types of missile which are moveable any place at any time. 2, already got tones of video and picture in their internet showing it just a wind turbine foundatios.

@Lucas-ix8bg

2 жыл бұрын

@Deleted But Not Defeated Lol they are up there in their space station laughing at your comment

@tallest4eva

2 жыл бұрын

@Deleted But Not Defeated I guess it takes an Armchair expert to know one!

@musakazem2998

2 жыл бұрын

@Deleted But Not Defeated whatever helps you sleep at night buddy. I never understood the mentality of people like you. How does underestimating the ability of your adversaries help you in anyway? You are doing the Chinese a favor by thinking how u think.

Three hundred nuclear explosions is still a lot of destruction

@tyson31415

2 жыл бұрын

Assuming they could deliver them. They drop a lot of their own rockets on themselves.

@klardfarkus3891

2 жыл бұрын

@@tyson31415 ok China can land an explorer on Mars but can’t drop a bomb with a missile.

@MichaelSHartman

2 жыл бұрын

Maybe they could just hit Democrat run gun control cities. Seriously, the United States estimated 30% of its launched weapons would hit its target. That's 90 for the Chinese. High value targets are usually not civilian.

@thelieutenant7732

2 жыл бұрын

@@tyson31415 I think you're confusing North Korea with China

@bluehotdog2610

2 жыл бұрын

@@MichaelSHartman It makes me sick that conservatives want to see liberals die over owning the libs.

Heard a passing remark that the Chinese like their tunnels. North Korea has a propensity to harbor their land based missiles in tunnels, and have a reputation for tunneling. I think I heard the wartime Japanese used tunnels. It wouldn't be inconceivable.

@zes3813

2 жыл бұрын

wrgg

@MichaelSHartman

2 жыл бұрын

@@zes3813 Okay it was dumb. What does wrgg mean?

The LCAC idea is good and all but what you really need is a metal gear. But I can see it as a good starting point.

hovercraft can travel all kinds of grounds its why they are commonly seen in montain and country roads and are near to replace tractors in agriculture

I've never understood the need to destroy the world 100 times over, I mean once is way overkill anyway

300 is still plenty.

@nemzi8969

2 жыл бұрын

Small compared to US and russia

@-Vektron

2 жыл бұрын

300 is enough to destroy the world.

@Elthenar

2 жыл бұрын

@@nemzi8969 How many times over do you need to destroy the modern world? I mean, assuming we don't have some top secret Star Trek level anti-missile system no one knows about, 300 warheads is enough to pretty much end the US. Then, with the two biggest economies suddenly gone, the rest of the world will be plunged into a great depression which would lead to more war and possible more nuclear exchanges. 300 is still plenty.

@VisibilityFoggy

2 жыл бұрын

@@-Vektron It really isn't, though. A deployment of 300 missiles wouldn't be pretty, but it also wouldn't be world-ending. It's not even "America-ending." The yield of these things isn't turned up to Castle Bravo or Tsar Bomba levels.

Watching from Cardiff, Wales 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 UK - love the channel very well done 👍👍

There's a possibility this is also a reaction to how some people in the USA seemed to dismiss 300 as not all that much, and so they might be concerned it's not enough for a minimal deterrence then and buffing the numbers up a bit to make it just a bit more scary.

i kinda like chinas`s approach, maintaining a nuclear arsenal is ver costly. and despite some morons(inlc. mainstream media) view of an conflict between nuclear power`s, would mostlikels not see use of nukes. as long both sides have 2nd strike capabilities.

@noahway13

2 жыл бұрын

Fox has biggest rating of all.

@shawnv123

2 жыл бұрын

@@noahway13 source?

@piotrd.4850

2 жыл бұрын

There's one problem with your notion: whole idea of deterrence depends on successful projection on unweavering resolve to use nuclear weapons in terms of conflict.

@noahway13

2 жыл бұрын

@@shawnv123 Fox news trumpets that all the time. They have biggest ratings. Google it.

@noahway13

2 жыл бұрын

@@shawnv123 Fox is mainstream media

where did you get that scrollable map that showed the us silos?

Great insights! Thanks for making cool videos!

Can you do a video about their "underground great wall" basically a 3 to 6 thousand mile tunnel system for their military Also I thought there's a treaty that prevents any countries from making nukes

@EPsuperFan

2 жыл бұрын

The treaty you mentioned is the nonproliferation treaty which bans major countries from intentionally exporting nuclear technology to non nuclear countries and obliges them to prevent such transfer from happening. There is no system so to speak to punish any country pursuing nuclear weapons but the rule of jungle means practically no country could do it without being targeted and retaliated in some way. Unless you are on extremely good terms with the hegemon, well, you know who I am talking about.

@mxn1948

2 жыл бұрын

@@EPsuperFan china, us, russia, britain and france as also the only ones allowed by the treaty to have nukes,and in theory, they are suppose to be reducing their stockpiles to zero eventually, but of course these are the P5 of the UNSC, they pretty much do what they want and no one else can do anything about it.

@yaphonghor4409

2 жыл бұрын

Just like what US can do but not others....

I hope China is developing better nuclear delivery systems based on quality rather than quantity.

@kentriat2426

2 жыл бұрын

I would point out your bloody so wrong. They have the most advanced missile systems for delivery that make the USA look like beginners with their old minute men. While the US and it’s western allies were caught up in 20 years in Afghanistan and Iraqi the Russians and Chinese developed hypersonic missile that dispute a western view they couldn’t alter direction in flight they both have done it. These missiles fly at Mach 5+ to fast for the AGIS radar based defence system to track let alone target leaving the west vulnerable for the next five years at least till they can catch up. Flying at these speeds following the curvature of the earth a ship has only between 4-12 seconds to sight and defend itself which is not going to happen to often. So you have the warhead plus kinetic energy combining doubling the explosive force on impact. Three hits is estimated could cut a carrier in half and destroy any other ship. Stick nuclear warheads on them and it’s game over for whom ever is on receiving end.

@Syllaeus

2 жыл бұрын

@@kentriat2426 I hope so

@royalmontpark

2 жыл бұрын

@@Syllaeus You've never heard of DF express, such as DF 41 and DF 17?

You have a few things wrong about the mobile missiles. They are an escalation missile first which means they go on the move when tensions rise. Second is the Russian mobile yars and topol missile hangers open up from the top and from time of alert can open the top of their hangers and launch in less than 4 minutes In reaction to eminent or pre emptive attack which they would see coming vis-à-vis three intelligence sources: Military satellites, ground based systems such as radar and human intelligence through planted spies.

Happy to see that Covert Cabal tried so hard to convince people that they are silo instead of windmills. Also happy to see that some reviewers claim those are decoys to waste others’ missiles.

@MrChickennugget360

2 жыл бұрын

funny seeing all these CCP shills claiming they are wind Farms- spread out 3 k between each other with massive amounts of concrete- built on a military base out in the middle of Nowhere.

5:57 “Extremely Environmental Friendly” 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

The better question is why do we have so many nukes?

@derekyank7380

2 жыл бұрын

For garage sale.😁😁😁

@deckardcain9789

2 жыл бұрын

In the event of Actual War, the bozo who launches last loses most of their capability in the first 30 minutes. This means USA is toast.

@yaphonghor4409

2 жыл бұрын

US knows that it must kill 100 time in order an enemy will perish!!!!!

those are wind turbines and those domes containing some kind of energy gas.

That Segway into the advert was gold

They only needed one bio-weapon.

@busyguy8266

2 жыл бұрын

Just one

@Z10N4Z1Z

2 жыл бұрын

Covid9000

@undeterminedchannel

2 жыл бұрын

Just one and it'll evolve and make variants of themselves.

@cellokid5104

2 жыл бұрын

Some random guy eating a bat in a wuhan meat market?

@Ass_of_Amalek

2 жыл бұрын

covid isn't what bioweapons are like. it spreads too easily and isn't deadly enough. and if china had intentionally released it, they would have done it in a different country - not so much to be safer, but to reduce suspicion. wuhan would have been the last place to do it. there would have been no need for a coverup if they had just done it in a different asian country. no, it was an accidental lab leak because the WIV's safety standards were crap.

the new site is a wind farm.....

@CovertCabal

2 жыл бұрын

A wind farm without wind mills? Strange strategy

@guillermoelnino

2 жыл бұрын

@@CovertCabal im just wondering if they got that directly from the ccp or from cnn

3:55 very chunky amphibious transport

They built "Missile Silos" We have know idea if they are for nuclear or conventionally armed missiles. Considering how they are grouped together and not dispersed (a single ICBM would destroy all of them) they are most likely NOT nuclear ICBMs but tactical Basllistic missiles to hit Carrier Groups and Second Island Chain Bases like Okinawa and Guam.

@taraswertelecki3786

2 жыл бұрын

No, that is not the case. Silos can withstand anything but a direct hit from nuclear warheads. To reliably destroy one requires blast over pressures in the region of 10,000 psi, and to do that requires pinpoint accuracy. One large nuclear warhead will not destroy all of them, but large numbers of low-yield but very precisely places 10-kiloton nuclear warheads will.

I think China went with minimal deterrence because for a long time, that was both what it could comfortably afford to operate, that their focus was on rapid economic development and frankly, there really wasn't any reason to spend more: Russian relations were reasonable to very good, America was way too interested in commercial opportunities in China and they were too far ahead anyway to approach, and problems with India could be managed. Now, China will expand its nuclear forces. My guess is probably around 2,000 warheads by around 2040, and I suspect an ongoing programme to create 1 nuclear weapon per week into the future, as its economy grows and it is able to decrease spending as a proportion of its GNP. But definitely their focus will be on high tech weapons: DEW, sensors, AI, cyber-warfare, space weapons, high speed aircraft and especially advances in submarine warfare.

7:03

@chacdogful

2 жыл бұрын

Perfect 👌

i think that self driving truks could make a bit of a difference with the 2hs truck essue, cuz they would be read all the time, but this is a lvl 4 to 5 self driving, so its long ways away or maybe not

@michaelmarchanda

2 жыл бұрын

Nuclear missiles on self driving trucks would be a target for terrorists. Who secures it? You need security staff with the trucks. So self-driving trucks makes no sense and are vulnarable to cyper attacks

@maickelvieira1014

2 жыл бұрын

@@michaelmarchanda why they would not have security? And why would they need it, makes thousands of fake ones and only a few with nukes, and cyber atacks can be prevented in lots of ways, why no nuke have ever been lounched by a cyber atack? Cuz they can be prevented

@maickelvieira1014

2 жыл бұрын

@@michaelmarchanda and also, u can have messures against theft like making the warhead a thud or the how eletrical system die, theres loads of videos on how us or russia have systems against it on youtube so go look for some

That brief footage of what i belive to be inert icbm reentry vehicles is extremely scary.

8:29 Imagine you are stationed at a nuclear missile silo dummy... You have nothing to do and in case of a nuclear war, you are the first to get nuked and don't even get the opportunity to shoot back. (Before someone comments: of course the dummy silos would have to be manned like the real ones, so no one could tell the difference.)

@Clem.ent.

2 жыл бұрын

Individual silos are not manned. There would be a fake maintenance schedule though.

@melvinf78

2 жыл бұрын

does it really make a difference if u, as an individual, have something to shoot back?

@Armored_Ariete

2 жыл бұрын

@@melvinf78 psychological difference

@taraswertelecki3786

2 жыл бұрын

There is no need to man every one of them. Minuteman missiles are not manned, but two men in a control center monitor and can launch fifty of them, each carrying one to three nuclear warheads apiece. There is no reason to assume China cannot do the same thing.

They have the necessary amount to level every major us city. I thinks that's more than enough to deter anyone.

@howtofuckamockinbird

2 жыл бұрын

@John Smith don't fool yourself, in such an engagement, US is alone.

@andrewgates9333

2 жыл бұрын

@John Smith lol. Australia= nuclear free zone.

@lolasdm6959

2 жыл бұрын

@John Smith All China actually need to deter is the US.

@Kayzef2003

2 жыл бұрын

@John Smith You think UK would dare nuke China if they know china can just nuke half of USA? There are no winners in a nuclear war...

@fuckyoutube2326

2 жыл бұрын

@@howtofuckamockinbird lol did you get you 50 cents for your posts, troll?

Those missle silos look like a wind farm under construction

probably the first time I've gone out of my way to check a sponsor

0:45 So the latest nickname for wind farm is called "nuclear missile silos", good to know. 🤣

@RobinTheBot

2 жыл бұрын

I like to build my windmills to last. That's why I cluster them around a high security military base, 3km apart, atop massive underground reinforced concrete bunkers, in the middle of nowhere. It's quite typical that you will be shot for trespassing on such a windmill farm field. It's so much better than the method everyone else uses of putting them on a normal sized slab in a bunch of mostly unguarded fields with no military base and no fortified bunkers. /s don't believe everything you read in the state owned media lol

@nonameratnowhere

2 жыл бұрын

@@RobinTheBot it’s a great achievement then🤪

China must build metal gears!

@Menaceblue3

2 жыл бұрын

Metal gear???? I remember an elite American unit went to Tselinoyarsk in the Soviet Union to destroy a secret weapon called "Shagohod"

@RameenFallschirmjager

2 жыл бұрын

@@Menaceblue3 Rumors are true!

Covert Cabal videos always make for a good pre- sleep video. In a good way.

Reading clear and present danger now and currently own all of the Jack Ryan novels. The early ones are so damn good

Jeffrey Lewis (arms control wonk) wrote a book on China's nuclear policy called 'the minimum means of reprisal'. It got translated into Chinese as 'The shortest means of revenge!' A bit different meaning haha

Nice explanation. Sounds like the Chinese have focused on building a commercial economy and a lesser military industrial complex.

@sawyernorthrop4078

2 жыл бұрын

Which makes a lot of sense. Their biggest asset at this point is a massive, cheap and skilled labor pool. Focusing on building economic power is much more beneficial to their interest.

@jackchen5232

2 жыл бұрын

Chinese defends budget only 1.5% of his GDP

I think this could be a deception game. Makes the opponent guess and trapping them with resource and time.

Where would you recommend to buy Chinese nuclear weapons, and accessories for them?

Who knows those silos are even real? Those are probably decoy silos.

Most Chinese people know this's the language America understands

@jahinsadman1505

2 жыл бұрын

most of the world know it. America needs to be taught a lesson and given a taste of their own medicine

@taraswertelecki3786

2 жыл бұрын

@@jahinsadman1505 I'm afraid China and the Islamic world will get force fed a bitter pill.

@jahinsadman1505

2 жыл бұрын

@@taraswertelecki3786 nah it's usa turn to face justice and the same kind of pain they cause others. death to usa

I wonder if some of those silos are for conventional anti ship missiles.

@jaydonly2336

2 жыл бұрын

It was build deep into China so conventional anti ship missiles would lose there range making them kinda a weird choice.

The Domino’s ICBM ad at 7:04 is a photo from Minuteman Missile National Monument, right next to Badlands National Park in South Dakota. My kids practiced Armageddon there when they were little.

300 Nukes is plenty as a serious deterrent.

Russian road mobile ICBM's are actually on patrol non stop, not all of them are stored.

Another great video

There could have been multiple reasons for Chinas lack of nuclear surplus The biggest I believe is possibly the idea of a nuclear build up was simply a 1 off event for human history, yes it happened between the USSR, and the USA but what if that was simply a very unlikely outcome. Another could have been a lack of realistic threats to China at the time, they never felt the need to have so many as they never felt there was a serious threat of them being attacked with one. Another I think is possible was simply their close proximity to the USSR, if someone launched a nuke at China just due to the proximity the USSR might have viewed it as a threat on their own nation, and launched.

Why does China use Roman letters on its missiles?

@gook5219

2 жыл бұрын

It was made for us

@Ass_of_Amalek

2 жыл бұрын

could be because those nuke parades are meant for an international audience.

@andrewgates9333

2 жыл бұрын

Cold war ii undeniably confirmed.

@MemeMarine

2 жыл бұрын

Lots of benefits logistically. Easier to track and alphabetize. And of course the international audience understands it.

@thelieutenant7732

2 жыл бұрын

Logically, it's a lot simpler to write because they can use Latin acronyms. It would be a lot more complicated to write them in full Chinese characters. Same reason why they write the same numbers as us on their vehicles and weapons, Chinese numbers would be harder to write and require more space. China nearly did a full switch to the Latin alphabet because Mao Zedong recognized its simplicity compared to traditional Chinese.

It’s already stated that the “new silos” are the bases of new wind turbines that are under construction. Please do your own research

@johndelong5574

2 жыл бұрын

You believe CCP?

@SimonNZ6969

2 жыл бұрын

Chinese troll bot, confirmed.

@guillermoelnino

2 жыл бұрын

@@johndelong5574 they either believe what their told or are paid to pretend the do.

@CovertCabal

2 жыл бұрын

Wind turbines aren't spread 3km apart, they don't have high security measures, they don't contain a central military base, and they don't require a huge hole dug into the ground and covered by the same weather shelters see at Chinese missile test ranges, like at Jilantai

@theralfinator

2 жыл бұрын

@@CovertCabal These are going to be extra mega huge high efficiency turbines. The CCP needs to make sure the West doesn't steal their new intellectual property so they need high security measures.

I love your video! GJ! 💪👍

Wyoming? The bulk of the silos are in Colorado and Nebraska.

Lmao 5:50 you could barely hold your laugh

Covert Cabal: "Why Does China Have So Few Nuclear Weapons?" Me: "Keep thinking that. that's exactly what china want's"

7:04 This is actually golden.

what a concept, decoy silos in desert so your enemy blowup bunch of sand and dummy lids

The Chinese have claimed that this silo site is actually a wind farm. Seems likely correct.

@CovertCabal

2 жыл бұрын

Windmills aren't spread 3km apart, they don't have high security measures, they don't contain a central military base, and they don't require a huge hole dug into the ground and covered by the same weather shelters see at Chinese missile test ranges.

@CovertCabal

2 жыл бұрын

Wind farms also tend to have wind turbines. That's kinda the whole point of wind farms. Yet, there aren't any.

"Your enemy can't possibly target them all" *Laughs in hypersonic MIRV ICBM's carrying 10-15 warheads and OWP's(Orbital Weapons Platforms) a'la 'Rods from or just precisely targeted de-orbited kinetic kill vehicles* I.e: think of a falcon heavy similar to the one used to launch StarLink but instead of microsats 60-100 solid 100ton tungsten or DU penetrators with RCS and a guidance package. Now imagine launching a half dozen of those but under some kind of commercial project. Then claiming a "unexpected systems failure" as a cover story as to why the microsats are just sitting there. Then one peaceful idyllic day in September a thousand streaks of light fall at speeds in excess of mach 25 to obliterate the targets entire strategic arsenal(subs, airbases, CSG's, silos, mobile ground launchers, C&C, and literally everything needed to sustain a proper military response. It CAN be done, we have the technology, all that is lacking is the WILL to get it done.

@Ass_of_Amalek

2 жыл бұрын

that's not even physically possible.

@captaindeliciouspants8315

2 жыл бұрын

@@Ass_of_Amalek except it is

@AGTheOSHAViolationsCounter

2 жыл бұрын

@@Ass_of_Amalek Yes actually it absolutely is possible please see the following. kzread.info/dash/bejne/nqNquLWLgrebddo.html

@nickolasbrown3342

2 жыл бұрын

doesn't exist yet, so it doesn't matter. no one wants a nuclear war, so it'll never matter.

@Ni999

2 жыл бұрын

Despite what the KZread video told you and regardless of how well he tried to calculate what weapons scientists already did, and despite the popular story that you're going get nuclear weapon-equivalent energy, and despite your excitement quoting numbers, you have a number of flaws with your expectations. Tungsten rods as proposed would max out a little over 8 metric tons, not 100 tons. Terminal velocity from any practical orbit is going to be around Mach 10 and the resulting energy at impact will be equivalent to about 11 tons - one-thousandth the size of the Hiroshima weapon. Don't worry about deep bunkers, that's what they were designed for - all of the energy is focused over a very, very small area. They were designed to break through missile silo doors that were hardened to withstand actual nuclear bombardment. Because they could do to those doors what a conventional nuke could not, the myth of the rods from God with nuclear bomb power was born. It was a stupid comparison then and it's been a stupid comparison ever since. The entire idea needs to die in a dumpster fire - except for science fiction, that's fine. The idea of agile targeting with relatively small fins at Mach 10 and above is ridiculous. Unless encapsulated in an adequate protective body and a flight path that includes aerobreaking, your entire flight control system is going to cleaned off of the rods as if attacked with the most terrifying molten sand blaster you can imagine. The sparse upper atmosphere at Mach 20 is not even funny. Good sci-fi authors know that and it's exactly why the Centari dropped rocks from orbit on the Narns. Finally a word about the orbital deployment plan. And that word is just no. Everyone with nukes works really, really hard at identifying everything going up - and you're not going to sneak a weapons platform - let alone a constellation of them - into a near Earth orbit to try to maximize your terminal velocity (making the impossible flight control problem even worse), put them to sleep, and have the world militaries decide to give you a piece of their minds on social media. The platform will be brought down, it will be "an accident," and unless you have your own security force and a private island surrounded by sharks with frigging laser beams strapped their heads, then in order to survive the next move, you will need to be a nuclear superpower ready implement your WW3 strategies because whether you like it or not, everyone has heard of orbital kinetic weapons, knows what kind of regime would try it, knows that the orbit insertion alone is phase one of the first strike, and will unleash immediate retaliation. All before you find out that your weapon system isn't as good as you thought. Have you ever looked at what we built in the Cold War and how much we spent? If the idea was possible we'd have done it long ago. But we didn't. It's not possible.

You should REALLY REALLY look into how well the analysis of these „satellite images“ is

That's good!

Covert Cabal for president!

120 silo picture is actually wind farm.

@CovertCabal

2 жыл бұрын

Windmills aren't spread 3km apart, they don't have high security measures, they don't contain a central military base, and they don't require a huge hole dug into the ground and covered by the same weather shelters see at Chinese missile test ranges.

@CovertCabal

2 жыл бұрын

Also, don't wind farms require windmills? Because satellite imagery shows there aren't any

@phileas007

2 жыл бұрын

@@CovertCabal Those next gen windmills are retractable. When there's no wind, they simply wait underground and prevent any stray birds from colliding with them.

@CovertCabal

2 жыл бұрын

Retractable wind mills? Haha. They can't just turn them off, instead they want to spend hundreds of millions extra to make them transform? But that also doesn't explain why they are so far apart, why they use the exact same giant weather shelters used at other Chinese ICBM test facilities like Jilantai where they've been testing new ways to base the DF-41, it doesn't explain the incredibly high security at the site, or what a large military base was built in the middle of it for

@phileas007

2 жыл бұрын

@@CovertCabal oh, that's simple: these are experimental, so the test facility places them so far apart just in case the rotor falls off - so it cannot damage the others. The weather shelter is simply economy of scale - why spend money on a new design if a proven one is readily available? The military base is to be powered by these windmills, duh. That's the entire purpose.

1. China is small compared to the US. 2. China's population is concentrated in the East of the country. 3. Most of their population in the East is concentrated in big cities. 4. And the US nuclear arsenal is concentrated in the largely empty midwest making it necessary for the Chinese to carefully chose between civilian targets (cities) or military targets (if it is even possible to effectively target US nuclear sites). 5. China's nuclear missiles will probably have to reach also the US East coast making it necessary to increase the solid fuel amount, which in turn probably means that the payload cannot easily be upped simultaneously making the warhead less effective while losing valuable minutes. 6. The US has two coasts, China has one crowded coast.

With regards to road mobile ICBMs, China does have underground and harden bunkers to store them which can survive a first strike and is less obvious then a missile silo. And it makes sense from their pov as they have the most road networks atm which is great for the mobile TELs. Their nuke strategy is instead of a first strike they make sure that at least some of their nukes survive for a retaliation. And as they say in a nuclear war, the living shall envy the dead.

@Crashed131963

2 жыл бұрын

The only way MAD has prevented WW3 for 60 years is that all the Nuclear countries can blow each other off the Earth. A country falling behind is not good in this system.