Not seen a lawyer with such knowledge about his subject... future is very sharp!

@GabbarSeTakkar

5 жыл бұрын

Abhishek Sharma The SC didn’t seem to think so and kicked his foolish ass!

@rdas181986

5 жыл бұрын

I think his arguments were good and sound but in this discussion itself he concedes that many questions like divinity linked to celibacy and the extent to which celibate vows are exercised are hard questions to answer.

@beingsocial1084

5 жыл бұрын

@@GabbarSeTakkar supreme court in many instances given contrary verdict on the cases which were in same nature so supreme court is also filled with pseudo intellectuals ike you.

@nandu9773

5 жыл бұрын

He should b CJI

@datsrohan

4 жыл бұрын

Sadhguru was in favour of women entering in sabrimala but not in shani temple.

Sai Deepak submissions were fantastic. My compliments to him.

@sops143

5 жыл бұрын

Yup awesome

Sai Deepak Nails it yet again. Promising advocate having a bright future.

@ananyalal7950

5 жыл бұрын

Looking at Justice Ansari's face, even he is fascinated by how brilliantly Mr. Deepak is placing his arguments.

@GabbarSeTakkar

5 жыл бұрын

kedar kulkarni Yeah, very bright future! The SC just kicked his ass with their verdict.

@kedardgr8

5 жыл бұрын

@@GabbarSeTakkar The Game has just began & One setback cannot determine the context. He got praise in the Supreme Court from judges for his well reasoned arguments in the same case. And FYI there was a lone judge Mrs.Indu Malhotra who in fact supported J.Sai Deepak and his teams arguments and refused to intervene in Religious matter. That is success.

@krishnayogi

5 жыл бұрын

@@aluminaterock660 nation is very different from the government ... Nation is the entity that soldiers die for.... Govt is the entity that is usually the most corrupt with out close competition ... So there is a huge difference in the words you pick...now for some reason you think it's ok ask the raja of travencore to merge with india but not respect their liabilities that is simply not constitutional just to clear ...for example let's say modi takes your money puts in some scheme and poof the money is gone how would feel about it ?? Similarly govt also needs to respect it's creditors .. in this particular the state is free to hand back the lands and finish off paying the 'rent' ... nevertheless the argument is beyond this .. the state has no business interfering in private faith ... What will state do next ? Out-law Shiva linga. Because they have weird relationship with male sexual organ and hence discrimination ?? When do we respect peoples privacy and private property ?

@krishs8059

5 жыл бұрын

this is the hindu phobia that minorities have been spreading all along!! all the laws favour minorities. Tell me one another country where we have such minority benefits, yet they only bite the hands that feed them ? how long will this continue? Infact Hindus are being oppressed and mocked by sections of minorities and they easily get away with it..! Hindus are secular by nature.. But the recent intolerance by sections of minorities are making Hindus more n more communal!! Hindu temples are owned by govt... is any mosque or church owned by govt? Tirupati temple gives 85% of its revenue to Govt. with only 15%, it provides high quality food and shelter free for devotees in tirumala hills and funds a university, school and also sankara netralaya eye hospital where there poor gets free treatment! Coming to land ownerships, hindu temple's land were seized by govt and the money that temples legitimately should get is being questioned by minorities!!! .... where as CSI is the largest non agricultural land owner after govt of India. Wakf boards are the 3rd largest land owners in India!!! who is oppressed here?!?

what powerful Arguments...Great Lawyer !!

Sai Deepak! What a brilliant arugment. First time I am seeing someone with a comprehensive knowledge about Hinduism

@hhnandu

5 жыл бұрын

The Truth about what Sai Deepak says... Dear Devotees/non-devotees/anyone who wants the truth, please read this & understand how you are being manipulated... On watching the first video, I thought he was just an idiot advocate.. But, on watching the 2nd one, I understood that he is not an idiot, but a manipulator.. First of all, let me point out the legal errors he blatantly make without any inhibition... 1. Art 27: Sai Deepak says that the Article prevents state from using tax money for religious purposes. This is wrong. Art 27 reads like this-No person shall be compelled to pay any taxes, the proceeds of which are “specifically appropriated” in payment of expenses for the promotion or maintenance of any particular religion or religious denomination. The term “specifically” indicates that no tax can be made specifically in the name of any particular worship place. (Tax is that which is imposed, the appropriation of which is approved by the Parliament in its sessions.) Art 27: indiankanoon.org/doc/211413/ This is how, tax money is used to finance the administration(not as rent) of Sabarimala in the form of Devaswom Board. If you think by basic logic, how can an unconstitutional Article continue to exist in the Constitution in the form of Art 290A - which says “A sum of forty six lakhs and fifty thousand rupees shall be charged on, and paid out of, the Consolidated Fund of the State of Kerala every year to the Travancore Devaswom Fund”. Art 290A: www.indianconstitution.in/2016/07/article-290a-constitution-of-india.html Also, another lie he said on this front was that Kerala Govt takes money from the temple more than it gives. This is an absurd argument which was propagated by the BJP in Kerala until two years ago, which was broken by the then MLA V.D.Satheesan openly in the media. If you understand Malayalam watch the video below. kzread.info/dash/bejne/pYCEuNOrY860erQ.html The above facts are known to each & every advocate & anyone who has learnt Constitution well. You can check with any neutral advocate/legal practitioner. This is why I am damn sure that he is a manipulator. 2. Art 25 gives the freedom of conscience & free profession, practice & propagation of religion. And it also says in Art 25(2)(b) that nothing in this article shall affect the operation of any existing law or prevent the State from making any law providing for social welfare and reform or the throwing open of Hindu religious institutions of a public character to all classes and sections of Hindus. You can clearly see that this article reduces the scope of religious freedom by throwing open all Hindu religious institutions of a public character to all classes & sections (I hope you understand this includes women of any age) 3. It does not say in any place in the Constitution that something written in scriptures can be allowed to continue in the name of religious freedom. So the rest of his arguments on the deity don’t have any value as to the rights guaranteed by the Constitution are concerned. And although it doesn’t matter as far as Constitution is concerned, I am telling you, there are no scriptures which tell Ayyappa is a Naishtika Brahmachari. This is a myth created by the pretend devotees who has their own devious motives behind it. You will understand this if you watch any discussion conducted in Malayalam TV channels where historians talk about this. It is available in KZread as well. For eg. The speech of Sunil P. Ilayidom. He is known for his writings and lectures on politics, literature, art and culture and is a recipient of the Kerala Sahitya Akademi Award. Moral: People will use your ignorance in certain things to fool you in many ways as everyone doesn’t need to study Constitution to the depth in which any advocate has to study it. So, it is easy to manipulate you. Please understand the reality behind every argument by consulting with the ones you can trust & the ones who know about the matter. Not the manipulators like Sai Deepak & Rahul Easwar.

It is high time that boys can file a court case for not getting admission in exclusive girls school, showing discrimination and Supreme court will hear and give decision.

@emmanuelstephenson3844

5 жыл бұрын

Read and understand article 14 before raising senseless arguments. Equality should be distributed among equals and not unequals. So the constitution through article 14 specifically provides protection for any minorities. In our patriarchal society the need to protect and uplift women is important. So if in any case such special protection or such special status is given to women, it comes under the ambit of Article 14. But to your statement, there are both girls only schools as well as boys only schools. There is no discrimination in the existence of such institutions. But if in an area or a place no other institution cannot be accessed and there only exists a single school then if that particular school fail to admit a person based on their gender then that may come under discrimination.

@austin426512

5 жыл бұрын

Emmanuel Stephenson Can you enlighten us why a women cannot lead mass or become pope or at least in the fray to be next pope?

@chandansharma3236

5 жыл бұрын

@@emmanuelstephenson3844 haha well said..the problem is a lot a people keep on blabbering abt equality without even having read once article 14, 15 n 16. This is a twitter world. The text that people read are the 280 characters and consider themselves knowledgeable enough to challenge established traditions without tracing the origins of the traditions and putting fwd dumb arguments.

@emmanuelstephenson3844

5 жыл бұрын

G V and honestly I have the same doubt. Women should challenge such personal laws. And I believe this historic judgment allows them to do so. So kudos brother for bringing that up.

@chandansharma3236

5 жыл бұрын

@@austin426512 valid question but what is important is the origins of the practise needs to be traced. Since our society has largely been patriarchal throughout history, we always tend to impute the practices be it religious, social or cultural to patriarchy based discrimination. This might not always be true. The Christian women if they desire to become pope should question this. Maybe a more informed debate would unravel.

God bless you Sai” Thanks from millions of Hindus. We are with you. Jai Bharath Vande Mataram

Sai bhai.. my young Darm Yodhha ----- soooooo profound, soooooo articulate and yet soooooo stern... May Maa Bharti and Dharm itself blesses and guides you...

This is what a talk show should be, this is what all des feminist's have to watch b4 dey claim der rights and move on debates. Peaceful.. This z d only talk show dt gave a more insight f d real case.... Respect for d anchor...

My humble namaskaram for the research you have done to protect the ancient Indian tradition. 🙏🙏👏👏

This program shows how a responsible media should behave. See how well this is conducted. Excellent.

Thank u deepak sir...fight till the the judgement is changed...we all be with u.....swamiyae saranam ayyappa.....🙏🙏🙏🙏

This guy loves what he does for a living. This profession of being a lawyer is inside him. Wishing him all the best!!

I just wish we had more lawyers like Sai..we have lot of devil's advocates but need of the hour is God's advocates...Jai bharat

@pvinayagam52

5 жыл бұрын

One is sufficient to drive us mad. Deepak is a specialist in beating about the bush. Lets have lawyers who can argue like Kapil Sibal, Bhushan and PC. Sabarimala case will be won easily.

@prakashv8185

5 жыл бұрын

@@pvinayagam52 the lawyers u r referring are no doubt they r gud but not for India..they can win cases which are against interest of indians..

@pvinayagam52

5 жыл бұрын

@Prakash. In English, there are two meanings: one is literal; another, metaphorical or figurative. When I say lawyers like Kapil Sibal, PC, Bhushan etc. it does not mean that I want the brief for Sabarimala to be given to them. I mean, lawyers who can make out their cases before the hon'ble Judges convincingly with proper body language.

@prakashv8185

5 жыл бұрын

@@pvinayagam52 well case is still pending before the court..so it is unfair to write off the lawyer and come to some kind of conclusion based on our own expectations..Sai may not be experienced like other devil's advocates but he will always be remembered as the one who faught for the Good irrespective of the result...also somebody has to stand up when all our eligible lawyers like the ones referred by you are on the wrong side..

@pvinayagam52

5 жыл бұрын

Case is sub-judice I know. This lawyer has already presented his case. He need not learn from Devil's Advocates; but from the Right wing lawyers who are as good as Kapil Sibal. Now that his presentation is over, there's no question of writing off him. Let's see the court's decision. If it goes against the women, it is bad for the future of the temple because we see women are getting equal in every sphere, including spiritual sphere, thanks to modern science and this temple will find it difficult to survive as an odd man out. If it stands as odd man, it is against the ethos of the Hindu religion itself. Hindu religion moves with times. It is not stagnant. The temple will then drown itself in the ethos of the fanatical religion like Islam. We can call it a mosque.

Sai Deepak, you have wonderfully explained the Hindu Philosophical and Theological view point from the Hindu practices perspective. Secondly, congratulations to you for not falling in the trap of looking at Hindu practices from the standpoint of Christianity. This is the ploy Hinduphobic intelligentsia generally play to brow beat the opponents. My request is please do contact Rajiv Malhotra. He has been fighting such Breaking India forces for the last more than twenty five years. You'll be doing wonders by collaborating with him. With your energy and verve and Rajivji's experience, it would be one plus one eleven.👍

@pvinayagam52

5 жыл бұрын

If he Rajiv Malhotra enters, it would be like setting a cat among pigeons. I think good lawyers are enough.

@truthsayer5824

2 жыл бұрын

@@pvinayagam52 wonderful suggestion Vinayagam ji. We should bring these two stalwarts together to fight the breaking India forces.

I salute Mr. Sai Deepak for the way he handled the absurd questions from the Judge and the Anchor. With each question he came out even stronger.

Wow! this guy Sai Deepak is smart, articulate and very well educated. Speaks well, inspiring guy

Adv. J Sai Deepak, hats off to the extensive knowledge you have, which make your arguments and replies, superb

Salute Sai Deepak 👍☺️

we should be proud that we have such a brilliant Advocate on our side.

Sanatan Dharma is getting more and more shine in the world. thanks.

Best news debate I've seen in Ages.

Sai Deepak. Excellent submission.

Thanks News X for this interview. No other channel to my knowledge showed Sai's side of argument. Sai Deepak - oh man you rock... God bless you...

J Sai Deepak, future Minister of Law

@pvinayagam52

5 жыл бұрын

so that he can get away with all he talks

Wow !! 2 people debating with facts and excellent knowledge of the subject . A suit and spectacle wearing anchor is not intrupting and moderating beautifully. This is a dream as considering the news channel debates. Brilliant. Loved it

I hate writing this but .... Mr. Ansari got his clock cleaned. The research and articulation from Sai were IMPECCABLE!

@GabbarSeTakkar

5 жыл бұрын

Data Lore This is not a debate. Justice Ansari was not there to debate Sai. He was offering his legal opinion. Idiots like you look at this as some form of sparring. And you are gloating here claiming a Hindu (Sai) victory over a Muslim (Ansari). Foolish is as foolish does. The SC cleaned all your clocks! Ding dong!

@cyogian

5 жыл бұрын

@@GabbarSeTakkar wait who mentioned Hindu or Muslim? Or is it you who is assuming like you assumed that the Sabrimala's intentionally discriminating women.

Adv Sai a big thanks for enlightening the very concept of Hindu philosophy which I firmly believe was the reason for the 5 judge , judgement. Believe various Hindu bodies are filing an appeal and this could be and should be reversed in the interest of everyone. Once again hat’s of to you sir .

Thank you Adv. Sai Deepak. Apne bahut achha, accurate and sensible argument diya.

This discussion on Shabarimla went in to different plane all together and Sai Deepak was excellent and full of wisdom..👍

Sai Deepak has literally enlightened us with his arguments , he has literally Nailed it and cleared all the doubts and misinformation spread by the Media nd liberal lobby...… More power to him ...

This interview has all the answers please watch this interview all the people who are into Sabarimala's issue of not allowing women. This is an encyclopedia in a nutshell. Good job Sai Deepak. Education + Enlightenment is the way forward not Education alone will help.

This guy is very knowledgeable and is putting the real cause which we are unknown of and just term it as gender inequality.

@tamilankalaigal2

4 жыл бұрын

Communist Christian brainwashing missionary agents are dividing India

Fantastic arguments! Loved watching it. I am worried about Sai Deepak's breathing though. He seems to be struggling while making his points with long breaths

@vineethv9933

5 жыл бұрын

Alexander Tsiolkovski

Advt. J sai Deepak you are simply great 👍👍👍👍👍👍

May Lord Ayyappa blesses you Adv. Sai Deepak, as you represents the real devotee of Lord Ayyappa in Sabarimala. Huge Respect from Kerala. 🙏🙏🙏🙏

Very good arguments are put forth. I thought this was an one sided case due to biased reporting of media. This seems to be very interesting

J Sai Deepak is so brilliant. He should advocate in court.

What Sai probably missed wrt "Can God have human flow?" is in Hinduism there is no concept of God, instead, you have the concept of Devata and Iswaran. Which is completely different from the Abrahamic concept of God. A deity is just Devata not Iswaran. See the irony, a constitution copied mainly from western constitutions (essentially founded upon Christian ideals) is forcing Hinduism (a vast and diverse belief system) to adhere to Abrahamic concepts.

@pvinayagam52

5 жыл бұрын

Correct

@gowrivishwanathan8086

5 жыл бұрын

I COMPLETELY AGREE

@cvrchetla

5 жыл бұрын

Well said

@sreejithsartdiary7328

5 жыл бұрын

Right

@SomeOne_1409

5 жыл бұрын

True, Atma and Parmatma. And very rightly said there is a difference between devta(deity) and Parmatma/Ishwar(God).

Eagerly waiting for the next episode. Sai is an inspiration.. how one can feed so much knowledge in their brains and deliver in such a beautiful and easiest manner. #respect 👏

Amazing clarity and knowledgeable explanation supported by constitutional and religious references. Loved hearing to Sai Deepak

Sai you have done your homework brilliantly. Hats off to you for such dedicated research...I'm a lawyer too and hence say this

I am in awe and admiration of the legal knowledge this young man has🙏👏👏

Albeit I fervently support gender equality, but J Sai Deepak has convinced me otherwise in this case.

@sreejithsartdiary7328

5 жыл бұрын

Exactly.. The point bro...!! It all dates back to the age old tradition and culture Hinduism is built upon

@rkodaman

5 жыл бұрын

Wrong usage of the word "albeit"

@ch.ajaysingh

5 жыл бұрын

@@rkodaman I know, thanks.

@tamilankalaigal2

4 жыл бұрын

Brother please be aware that Christian missionaries are brainwashing indians

Both sai n judge have done very good job.... even that retired judge should be appreciated..he put some grateful questions in front of sai... n sai owned it.. both are good..

@hhnandu

5 жыл бұрын

The Truth about what Sai Deepak says... Dear Devotees/non-devotees/anyone who wants the truth, please read this & understand how you are being manipulated... On watching the first video, I thought he was just an idiot advocate.. But, on watching the 2nd one, I understood that he is not an idiot, but a manipulator.. First of all, let me point out the legal errors he blatantly make without any inhibition... 1. Art 27: Sai Deepak says that the Article prevents state from using tax money for religious purposes. This is wrong. Art 27 reads like this-No person shall be compelled to pay any taxes, the proceeds of which are “specifically appropriated” in payment of expenses for the promotion or maintenance of any particular religion or religious denomination. The term “specifically” indicates that no tax can be made specifically in the name of any particular worship place. (Tax is that which is imposed, the appropriation of which is approved by the Parliament in its sessions.) Art 27: indiankanoon.org/doc/211413/ This is how, tax money is used to finance the administration(not as rent) of Sabarimala in the form of Devaswom Board. If you think by basic logic, how can an unconstitutional Article continue to exist in the Constitution in the form of Art 290A - which says “A sum of forty six lakhs and fifty thousand rupees shall be charged on, and paid out of, the Consolidated Fund of the State of Kerala every year to the Travancore Devaswom Fund”. Art 290A: www.indianconstitution.in/2016/07/article-290a-constitution-of-india.html Also, another lie he said on this front was that Kerala Govt takes money from the temple more than it gives. This is an absurd argument which was propagated by the BJP in Kerala until two years ago, which was broken by the then MLA V.D.Satheesan openly in the media. If you understand Malayalam watch the video below. kzread.info/dash/bejne/pYCEuNOrY860erQ.html The above facts are known to each & every advocate & anyone who has learnt Constitution well. You can check with any neutral advocate/legal practitioner. This is why I am damn sure that he is a manipulator. 2. Art 25 gives the freedom of conscience & free profession, practice & propagation of religion. And it also says in Art 25(2)(b) that nothing in this article shall affect the operation of any existing law or prevent the State from making any law providing for social welfare and reform or the throwing open of Hindu religious institutions of a public character to all classes and sections of Hindus. You can clearly see that this article reduces the scope of religious freedom by throwing open all Hindu religious institutions of a public character to all classes & sections (I hope you understand this includes women of any age) 3. It does not say in any place in the Constitution that something written in scriptures can be allowed to continue in the name of religious freedom. So the rest of his arguments on the deity don’t have any value as to the rights guaranteed by the Constitution are concerned. And although it doesn’t matter as far as Constitution is concerned, I am telling you, there are no scriptures which tell Ayyappa is a Naishtika Brahmachari. This is a myth created by the pretend devotees who has their own devious motives behind it. You will understand this if you watch any discussion conducted in Malayalam TV channels where historians talk about this. It is available in KZread as well. For eg. The speech of Sunil P. Ilayidom. He is known for his writings and lectures on politics, literature, art and culture and is a recipient of the Kerala Sahitya Akademi Award. Moral: People will use your ignorance in certain things to fool you in many ways as everyone doesn’t need to study Constitution to the depth in which any advocate has to study it. So, it is easy to manipulate you. Please understand the reality behind every argument by consulting with the ones you can trust & the ones who know about the matter. Not the manipulators like Sai Deepak & Rahul Easwar.

@poojauday251

5 жыл бұрын

@@hhnandu If that is so then why didn't justice Ansari say anything? I mean he is not just an advocate. He was the chief justice of Patna high court. I am sure he understandss the constitution as well as Sai or even more than him. The common people can be manipulated but how can justice Ansari be manipulated. Just a food for thought.

@hhnandu

5 жыл бұрын

@@poojauday251 hey friend, I would really like you to cross check the facts with what I said.. and check if Sai is telling the truth.. when it is clear for yourself, you will also think why ansari acts like a complete idiot.. I believe both of them are part of the manipulating agenda.. I'm a malayalee hindu born woman.. I'm a theist.. still, I don't want to enter Sabarimala because of so many personal reasons.. I don't have any devious agenda in this.. I'm just a student, a civil services aspirant.. that's how I know the constitution.. I felt really bad when I saw this person manipulating even educated Indians.. that's why, even though I have a lot to prepare, I took the effort to share the truth with you all.. Please check with someone/credible source.. about everything I shared.. you will understand how I felt...

@poojauday251

5 жыл бұрын

@@hhnandu Not sure about who is acting or who is not. I can't even verify your claim of calling it a manipulating agenda. I don't know law nor I know anyone who is well versant with the laws of this land. But I read that while he presented his submission in the court, with respect to this case, the judges were quite impressed with him. If whatever you are saying is correct, then I don't know whether anyone else called them out after watching this show.

@hhnandu

5 жыл бұрын

www.visionias.net/2017/10/indian-polity-by-m-laxmikanth-pdf-download.html This is a link to download Indian Polity book.. This is a famous book to learn polity. (Link is from Vision IAS website- a popular IAS coaching institute) If you go to *page no. 180* of this, under the heading "Freedom from Taxation for Promotion of a Religion" - first paragraph, last line reads like this "This means that the taxes can be used for the promotion of all religions" (It is about Art 27, which he clearly lied about) If you read the whole paragraph, you will get the idea.. Okay, this is all I can do.. If you still don't believe me, I don't know what else can I do.. You don't need to give a reply for this.. I just want to you to try to understand.. Thank you.. Bye..

I never heard more clearer arguments than deepak...

Sai we are proud of you and we salute your mother for giving birth to such a lovely and wise boy. May Sri sabrimalai be always on your side

Justice Ansari looks dumbfounded in front of this smart chap. His questions seem to indicate that he doesn't even know the most popular Article 25-2A.

@alvintifr

5 жыл бұрын

Bhaskar Ji, He is not Dumbfounded, he is smirking through his teeth that he can question Other's culture and character of deities (which he can't do in his own community) and randomly put his remarks on cultures (for example calling a celibate diety that he could be homosexual etc). He can not take Mohammad's name without saying prophet and 'peace be upon him' but he can take 'Shri Hnuman's' name freely without respect. He is just rubbing this entire debate on every Hindu's face . My respect to the Young Advocate, but what are 'we' doing??

Absolutely brilliant. Pranaams to Sai Deepak.

What a comprehensive debate! Loved it.

Sai deepak sir, at your best!!

It happened exactly as he said. They brushed everything under the carpet. They removed the age bar for women. Now lakhs of Ayyappa Devotees especially women from five states Kerala Tamilnadu Karnataka Andrapradesh and Telangana maybe more are on the street since last 4 days to cancel the verdict.

J sai Deepak has not only justicifed the restriction of women entire to sabarimala temple but also he clarified doubts even Hindus or devotes of swami ayyappa were not aware of. Thanks to him. But the irony is only Hindu temple or Hindu belief system is crushed, by so called secular people. Why not other religions for example, Muslim women should ware hibaj(black burka) even on hot summer why not Muslim men. This is perpousfull imposed on her ,she can't walk way from it. But restriction of women to entry of sabarimala temple is not that way. If women want to enter temple she needs to wait until her age or she can just ignore the daity itself. It is not imposed on any women. Hinduism is much secular compared to any other religion. Any of secularist is having answer for it.

@pvinayagam52

5 жыл бұрын

What's happening to you? You're saying it is not imposed on women :-) It is imposed, dear, on all girls and women from 12 to 50.

@pvinayagam52

5 жыл бұрын

We don't need to whitewash the arguments by making general statements about the religion. If you say it is secular, it is broad minded, it is accommodation - all such statements are applied to the religion as a whole. Take this temple only which is the bone of contention now. You cannot bury the bone with the sand of general statements on the religion. Sabarimal is rigid and its traditions are hostile to the 50% of devotees namely women. Do you agree with it or not? If you agree, this temple negates the open values of Hindu religion.

@pvinayagam52

5 жыл бұрын

About other religions, it is their women who should stand up for their rights. The Muslim women have done it in the case of triple talaq. If they don't do so, in respect of veil, it is quite clear that they don't want to.

@girishchandran7705

5 жыл бұрын

I think so, u didnt understand the concept and talking. Take ur time brother and the watch this video of part 1 and 2 again with unbiased neutral mind. May be u understand

@pvinayagam52

5 жыл бұрын

Dear Chandran, it is not the concept that is my discussion. It is his statement which is, according to me, is false. He says in Hindu religion, man can become God. He says it is for the whole religion. In Hindu religion, there're variety of sects of which only one or a few, is what he says. If he makes his argument for the religion, as a whole, he will lose this case because the religion is like a ocean of cross currents. You can't fix it. Hope you'll understand what I'm talking about.

Thank You Sai Sir for such elevated arguments and insight into Hindu philosophy with its complexities and the fine line one has to tread.Sir you have done justice and given clarity on the matters arising . Your compelling arguments in favour of the Temple was very thought provoking and convincing whereby giving a clearer understanding of the definition between Discrimination and Exclusion Great Respect to Justice Ansari for your attentiveness and the way you sought clarity during the discussion. SAI SIMPLY BRILLIANT you NEVER DISSAPOINT

Sir J Sai Deepak, you completely nailed the program

Beautiful discussion!!show this to Arnab Goswami!!we want these kind of intellectual debates/discussions

Hats off to NewsX for a mature, informative debate!

The lawyer seems smarter and more well versed than the judge

@vivekkarankal4709

2 жыл бұрын

Bang on..... 👍👍😂

@ramanvarshini956

2 жыл бұрын

Don't say it. Judges were lawyers too

SAI DEEPAK SIR will become CJI of INDIA

@pvinayagam52

5 жыл бұрын

Yes, that post will suit him because he can say things round and round for hundreds of pages in his judgement like Krishna Iyer did.

@mahi98goodguy

5 жыл бұрын

Sadly.....Our pseudo secularism would never allow it

@pvinayagam52

5 жыл бұрын

Our Constitution won't allow inequality between men and women.

@GabbarSeTakkar

5 жыл бұрын

Raj Kumar Not really. I truly don’t wish people like him (misogynist, sexist and a moron to boot) to preside over our laws.

@punisherwarlord

5 жыл бұрын

you are right only assauddin owaisi is fit to be the CJI in future,,,

Sai Deepak sir u r simply awesome well said

Wonderful explanation and defence of Ayappa Twmple at Sabarimala . Thank you Sai. God bless you for protecting Hinduism

Great discussion and I appreciate Sai Deepak for sharing the knowledge with public, hat off. You are great.

@pvinayagam52

5 жыл бұрын

It is neither discussion nor debate. It is a one man show. To make him talk

@prabhosha2784

5 жыл бұрын

but that is the truth.

I indeed appreciate arguments by Sai.. he has studied the subject very well.. 👍🏻

Debate at this level of frequency... No shouting No quarrels Indicates that how great and knowledgeable the debators are... Two Great human beings and a great host too...

Fantastic efforts, thanks for this.

Sai clearly has that edge , being the advocate of God..!! Go for it man !!

This advocate is very sharp and have articulated it very well...Keep it up..

came here to listen only sai bhaiya :). What a expertise.

Brilliant J Sai Deepak ji KO Naman 🙏. Masterpiece Discourse . Sai ji's performance is par excellence .

Wow Sai Deepak. Bright eyed promising intelligent Lawyer.

This Young advocate has a very very bright future.

Sai Deepak sharing some real knowledge with the degree holder i-sheeps.

Namaskaaram Sree.Sai Deepak! Bravo! Your words holds the real light of deepam! Ultimately true knowledge alone wines & shines! Plz plz plz try to impart your precious knowledge with the totally misguided, blinded Hindu students of Indian schools & universities! They have to take up the light & hold the vision that "Sarvam khalvidam Brahma" or Ishaavaasyamidam Sarvam tomorrow. So they need teachers for that. And schools & Indian universities must have the right to teach Indian scripts! Who can ban it? Who has the right to ban it? 'Secularism' is a proven mistake in India... We all recognized it or experiencing it! I wish Shabarimala must strongly fight for autonomous state after this gender issue! Sathyameva Jayathe! N.B:- like other religious texts Hindu scripts are not for making a human good& dhaarmic....it is to make you Bhagavān Himself! That's why Ishwara is in human form! Humanly instruments are given or human janma is given to elevate the Self from body level to Ishwara/Bhagavān/Brahma level! No other purpose is mentioned in any scripts! Like no true Guru wish his/her disciples be mere sevaks through out their life...A True Guru tries always to elevate all up to His/Her own state!

Rockstar lawyer... Pride of India... Sharp n wise .. go long way sai Deepak

Finally the right way to speak about this issue. This man has done it. This is what I was expecting actually from someone. Glad he came forward.

I don't want to see this in spiritual way. But I didn't hear such knowledgeable discussion till now. He have good way to map the answer to question. I want to follow his discussions. And wish him to contribute more such effective arguments.

Do not agree... sabarimala is not funded by government.. it's the other way round as it's a major source of income for state of kerala

@ramakrishnachitturi9568

5 жыл бұрын

I totally agree with you, not only Sabarimala temple all our Hindu temple’s revenue is used by government

@MrDillbud

5 жыл бұрын

Used by government for so called secular projects to improve muslim-christian minority status and multiply their numbers. Only The Hindus are deprived the fruits of their own Khoon-Paseena.

@poonamabbi7448

5 жыл бұрын

Most Hindu temples ARE BEING ROBBED by the govt.

@ramamoorthy9092

5 жыл бұрын

OK let kerala govt delink all direct income indirect income and stop Funding also

@rai3086

5 жыл бұрын

Ramamoorthy Moorthy That will never be done , Hindus can’t expect anything from a communist govt , people need to think, let them stop donating , let the govt fund from its own pocket , after all they pay for the minorities pilgrimage etc ... once the funds stop coming then probably the govt will give up the authority over the temples finances

Excellent articulation of the delicate and sensitive issue. Many points were elucidated and explained in a simple manner which are complex and need a high level of comprehension.

Now I realise why the temples should be freed from the clutches of the Government, thanks so much for the insightful perspective Sai Deepak Sir.

Advocate is a great person such huge details in the subject I am saluting with tears because india DNA is so strong 👍👍👍👍

My opinion is that Sai Deepak should fight all our religious/historical/ cases of national interests. Huge salute to his knowledge about the subject.

Wonderful. Hats off to Sai !!

Mr. Sai, I understood from your speech that Temples are funded by the State, but that money given is not any kind of donation, but towards rent/lease charges of the properties earlier owned by these temples and subsequently taken over by the rulers and then handed over to the Government on formation of Indian Union. Thats fine. But what about the huge money the devotees donate to the temple as offering in cash or in kind ? It is learnt that all together around 5 crore devotees visit Sabarimala in an year (Temple open only around 140 days or so). Even if we take each devotee donates Rs. 100, the income will be Rs. 500 Crores in an year. But it should be more than double of that. Hence absolutely there is no funding from the Government for Sabarimala Temple and the temple is self sufficient and run by the money paid by the devotees themselves for Lord Ayyappa even without taking into consideration the so called rent the Govt owes to the temple for managing its properties.

Now this is what is called a debate and discussion 👍

Bhai J Sai Deepak, I have become a fan of you. 👌👍

Serious and profound issues explained in the most powerful yet simple n very lucid articulation. Hats off to you Mr. Sai. You would make a wonderful lawyer. My best wishes.

This is the true qualities of an honest attorney. Research n speak on facts. He is doing his job very responsibly.

Excellent legal and logical explanation by Sai

This man should be next Chief Justice of India one day.

Ayyappa is reborn in J Sai Deepak to stand up for Ayyappa!! He is sharp legal kind, knows scriptures, is religious, knowledge and has the character and courage to fight for Ayyappa. Thank you

Excellent discussion... And Mr. Sai Deepak has just nailed it... Ty sir...

Baap re clarity..

Why are Kerala Hindus protesting? (IN A NUTSHELL) Kerala is witnessing unprecedented Hindu uprising in protest against the Sep. 28 Supreme court judgment making unlawful, the ban on entry of 10-50 aged women in Sabarimala temple in Kerala & ban on entry of women during their menstrual days in temples across the country . Common hindus with absolutely no political affiliation are taking to streets across Kerala in a sense of absolute betrayal of their faith by the Supreme Court and Kerala government! However, there is nation-wide misunderstanding on the real cause of the uprising, especially in the absence of healthy debates on the matter in non-Malayalam Media. This is most evident from the National Womens' Commission chairperson's remarks that she fails to understand the issue as women are free to enter or not to enter a temple ! This remark shows how superficial the national understanding is , of the issue. This note is an attempt to drive reality of the sep. 28 SC judgment home to English-speaking Indians. Kindly forward this message to as many non-Malayalees as possible. Let truth prevail! Precisely because the Sep. 28 SC Constitution Bench verdict violates a Hindu's Fundamental right to belief guaranteed by the Constitution (Article 25)! Lets see how.. We need to break the judgment into two parts: 1. Entry of women between 10 and 50 years of age to Sabarimala temple. Context: It is custom of centuries (Despite odd instances of nepotism-led -later Tantrically pacified-entries otherwise ) that women of menstrual age are denied access to the Sabarimala temple. This custom is connected to the Tantrically conceived Naishtika Brahmachari nature of the deity and the concept of Deity-believer unity/singularity , violation of which is believed to violate the very nature of the deity and destroy the sanctity of the temple The Agitating points: * The verdict fails to acknowledge the very nature of any Hindu temple. A Hindu temple is not and should not be a "public place" that unconditional/unqualified access enforcible by invoking fundamental rights. Hindu temples are Devaswom/ Devasthanas (Place of God, legally acknowledged in many court judgments. In short , it is private property where entry only if conducive to the deity's Tantric nature can be acknowledged. No tresspass to be allowed. * There is only age restriction, not gender descrimination in Sabarimala. Article 14 which was (cited by petitioners as basis for appeal for the women-entry )seeks to prevent discrimination * According to Hindu belief, a Temple more than / different from any other building because of the Tantric energy conceived there. A temple is sanctity / divinity is lost if rules to ensure Tantric energy's maintenance are not enforcible. Only a Tantric can decide on behalf of all worshippers on aspects of Tantric energy.The verdict would legally prevent temple authorities / Hindus from preventing entry of menstrual-age women which will diminish temple sanctity. This is a direct onslaught on a Hindu's Fundamental right to belief guaranteed by the Constitution (Article 25). 2. Entry of women during their menstrual days to all Hindu temples in the country Context: All body wastes are denied entry to Temples and are considered impure. This is why there are no toilets attached to Hindu temples. Since menstrual flow is beyond body control, women are denied entry during the first five days of every menstrual period (five days every month). This part of the verdict has more far-reaching consequences and is not limited to sabarimala Temple, but lakhs of temples across India. This would mean that it would be illegal for Temple authorities to include prohibition of entry of menstruating women as part of rules to maintain temple sanctity. Worse, devotees and temple authorities can only remain mute spectators if "Liberal" activists walk upto the sanctum / garbhagriha with placards crying"We are bleeding" . Worst, this judgment would make way for calls for appointment of women including, on menstrual days as pujaris. The Agitating point: * As with the first part of the verdict, According to Hindu belief, a Temple more than / different from any other building because of the Tantric energy conceived there. A temple is sanctity / divinity is lost if rules to ensure Tantric energy's maintenance are not enforcible. Only a Tantric can decide on behalf of all worshippers on aspects of Tantric energy.The verdict would legally prevent temple authorities / Hindus from preventing entry of menstruating women which will diminish temple sanctity. This is a direct onslaught on a Hindu's Fundamental right to belief guaranteed by the Constitution (Article 25). In short, there is an overwhelming sense of betrayal by the ruling Court and the Kerala State Gov. (which supported the petitioners) among the Kerala Hindus ; For them, prohibiton of essential temple rituals vilify their temples making temples mere Public buildings , devoid of the Tantric energy they visit the temples for! Can there be a greater attack on a religious group ? This note is an attempt to drive reality of the sep. 28 SC judgment home to English-speaking Indians. Kindly forward this message to as many non-Malayalees as possible. Let truth prevail! SATYAMEV JAYATE!

@maggem123

5 жыл бұрын

All these are happening (in my view) for Kerala hindus to be more devoted to Ayyappa.

@krishs8059

5 жыл бұрын

exactly. I think this is just a game play of Ayyappa to his devotees... Saranam Ayyappa!!

@hhnandu

5 жыл бұрын

Same tantric ideas & deity's wish were propagated during the entry of Dalits into the temples in Kerala.. The then top priests asserted that there are no shuddhikarmas or pariharas possible if Dalits enter the temple.. Even if a dog or criminal enters, there were parihara kriyas, but not a dalit.. And the Dalits were told, if they believe in God, they should not enter.. The exact same thing is happening in Kerala right now.. Go away with your stupid arguments.. No God will ever snatch a piece of land & tell a section of devotees not to enter there because he is meditating in the celibate nature.. That is your perverted version of the deity.. Or the ones spread by the later stupid tantris to assert their position in the society.. The real God/deity is beyond your or their imagination... Social & religious reformers have always encouraged questioning the religious practices.. This kind of an intellectual review is necessary for every religion/temple for its continued existence.. Retrogressive traditions & customs should be removed as the society grows.. People like you are trying to pull the society back.. And Yes.. SATYAMEVA JAYATE... (I am a Malayalee Woman)

@SJ-zo3lz

5 жыл бұрын

@@hhnandu : You are so ignorant! Which Tantric text mentions only certain castes should enter? Max., they want "Brahmins" as poojaris to maintain tantric purity as the poojari is the one who brings life to the stone and makes it a deity! And "Brahmin" can be from any caste; As long as strict practice of sattvic diet etc . are made. Try to understand that Hindu temples are not mere museums & deities are not mere statues that every person has a fundamental right to "see"! One's fundamental right is subject to others' fundamental rights (here, a devotee's right to retain Ayyappa chaitanya-fundamental right to belief). And btw check what Article 14 says; age/day restriction is not even gender discrimination ! It is obvious that you got such education from Parties that cunningly Project any assault on Hinduism as "progress"! We are past that era FYI! You will obviously support the "right" of Worshippers to enter the sanctum wearing toilet chappals!

@hhnandu

5 жыл бұрын

@@SJ-zo3lz Hahaha.. I ask you back the same question.. Which tantric text says young women cannot enter Sabarimala..? There are only 2-3 tantric texts based on which South Indian temples operate.. The earliest one being "Thanthrasamuchayam".. None of them says this stupidity.. Only the Agamas of the temple written in the 19th century dictates the nishtas to be followed by a devotee "samy"... It is not a thantrashastra as you want to try to project.... Who are you trying to cheat? Yourself? Do a better research on the subject before spreading such stupidity.. And I am repeating the same thing to you "One's fundamental right to practice a perverted custom stops when it denies entry to another human being, which is his/her fundamental right" .. And Art 14.. I think you better read it first.. It doesn't say anywhere in the article that age/day restriction is not gender discrimination.. A 20 year old boy can enter, whereas 20 year old girl cannot.. It is pure discrimination & is based on a belief created from vacuum.. I have studied Constitution dear.. Don't try to teach me your ignorance.. Please understand that everyone has the right to believe.. Denying my entry according to your belief is where the stupidity starts.. You believe in the stupid custom, you don't go.. That's fine.. But you believe, so I should not go - - what is the basis of that argument? And, I would never say anyone to enter with toilet chappals in a temple.. No one would.. That is just an argument you project when you have nothing else to say.. A rule that insists not to wear chappals inside a temple is for everyone to follow & is not affecting the social fabric of the society (like here in the case of Sabarimala, when women tried to enter the shrine, they were abused, pelted stones at & even their houses were attacked.. One of them had to run for their life.. Don't tell me, real devotees won't attack.. Only because of the invisible popular support by the devotees, these perverted elements were able to attack them). So, I hope you understood that none of the parties had a role to play in my argument.. I did my own research long before the verdict came.. Even from my childhood, I was questioning why I was denied entry to Sabarimala.. No one gave me a proper explanation.. And none will ever be able to.. Because it is a whole bunch of stupidity.. And the future generations will definitely call you the retrogressive section of the society.. This stupid custom is going to change.. If not by verdict, then by popular demand from an educated society you have not seen yet.. It is not an assault on Hinduism.. Hinduism has evolved through many changes & it further will.. The customs which don't discriminate anyone & hurt anyone will stay forever.. I am a proud Hindu.. & a proud human being too..

Dear Deepak - your vast knowledge, debating skills, presence of mind is phenomenal - you already are and will be even more a champion of our culture and "religion" What amazes me the way you demolish the opponent argument so coolly and politely - really admirable!!

Excellent argument Sai Deepak God bless you 😇😇

wonderfully hosted talk show. both participants exhibited the true spirit with which an argument should be carried out. Sai, with his clarity of thought was outstanding. I shall come back to the channel for more such discussions.

Great Deepak jii ... bold and effective reply.. advocacy should be like this.

Impressed💜 Inspiring Lawyer😍

This give us us a lot of logic till what extent a law can interfere

Very knowledgeable. ....its worth watching ...