Sabarimala: Are Notions Of 'Purity', Women's Right To Worship At Odds?

Protests refuse to die down in Kerala after two women enter the Sabarimala shrine. In September, the Supreme Court in its verdict had said that "social exclusion of women, based on menstrual status, is a form of untouchability" and that "notions of purity and pollution, have no place in constitutional order". Despite these stern words from the Supreme Court, the temple was shut down and a "cleansing ritual" was undertaken by the chief priest. In this episode of We The People, we debate whether such "purification" rituals are just another way of propagating untouchability and whether this move is like contempt of the top court's order.
NDTV is one of the leaders in the production and broadcasting of un-biased and comprehensive news and entertainment programmes in India and abroad. NDTV delivers reliable information across all platforms: TV, Internet and Mobile.
Subscribe for more videos: kzread.info?sub...
Like us on Facebook: / ndtv
Follow us on Twitter: / ndtv
Download the NDTV Apps: www.ndtv.com/page/apps
Watch more videos: www.ndtv.com/video?yt

Пікірлер: 150

  • @saraltrader6805
    @saraltrader68055 жыл бұрын

    Purification is not to anything with Menstruation it basically purify the Brahmacharya of the Deity.

  • @adithyanrs8032

    @adithyanrs8032

    5 жыл бұрын

    @Que hahagah are u the son of charcli Chaplin uuuhuhuu joke joke

  • @manju8138
    @manju81385 жыл бұрын

    Please call Sai Deepak as one of your panelists. You won't, everyone knows why?Sabarimala was one of the temples in Kerala which had no caste discrimination, FYI.

  • @munirajc3575
    @munirajc35755 жыл бұрын

    We will always purify our temple whenever traditions are broken. We have fudemental rights

  • @agn4321
    @agn43215 жыл бұрын

    Hanuman is a brahmachari but all ladies can enter hanuman temples.. God Sastha in Sabarimala is believed to have two wives but is still labelled as a brahmachari.. Why? Just to avoid ladies going there?

  • @itzme3384

    @itzme3384

    5 жыл бұрын

    Hanuman is a character in ramayana whereas as ayyappa in sabarimala is 'manikandan ' whom we believe reincarnation of ayappa.

  • @ash10k9
    @ash10k95 жыл бұрын

    We keralites are afraid that the renaissance happened in Kerala in the last century will be ruined once RSS forces get dominance in Kerala politics. RSS newspaper last week even published a cartoon discriminating the chief minister based on his cast.

  • @munirajc3575

    @munirajc3575

    5 жыл бұрын

    Cm pinarayari and it's party is doomed

  • @manju8138

    @manju8138

    5 жыл бұрын

    Oho, we should be afraid of our mentally unstable Chief Minister.

  • @agn4321
    @agn43215 жыл бұрын

    The bizarre customs and rituals in all religions should be stopped.. We should move forward not backward

  • @McShweezy
    @McShweezy5 жыл бұрын

    Decent debate. Although Gargi Rawat needs to let the panelists speak out throughly especially after being asked a ques. The right wing in India just wants to dwell in the past blindgly.

  • @rajeshmp1096
    @rajeshmp10965 жыл бұрын

    people who dont abide constitution,dont have right to live in INDIA.

  • @manju8138

    @manju8138

    5 жыл бұрын

    Left government,upholds respect for constitution and supreme court only in this particular case. Check other supreme court orders (Kerala) you'll find many,not implemented till date.

  • @munirajc3575

    @munirajc3575

    5 жыл бұрын

    So let's ban all ladies club than no pink busses and no ladies toilet either

  • @munirajc3575

    @munirajc3575

    5 жыл бұрын

    Exactly that is why u should leave India. Take stupid Supreme Court judges who don't know constitutional fundamental rights. And toxic feminist maniacs with u

  • @krishkg6475
    @krishkg64755 жыл бұрын

    guys does anyone know naishtika Brahmmacharyam. he is in that form. he said to his devotees that I don't want to see a women coz I'm taking Brahmmacharyam. only child's and old womens are allowed in my place. its not about pure or impure at all. any age of women can enter in my other temples where am in others forms. just not in this temple where he is Brahmmacharyam form. hope you guys understand what m trying to say.

  • @acridotherestristis
    @acridotherestristis5 жыл бұрын

    In the Indian context, this was a refreshingly mature and enlightening discourse! Bravo!!!

  • @meoowthunder2038
    @meoowthunder20385 жыл бұрын

    90% people in Kerala not agree women going to sabrimala it's all about traditional customs

  • @manju8138

    @manju8138

    5 жыл бұрын

    True, besides not even a single female devotee demanded this. National media never showed the protests against the verdict.

  • @kadukkathara

    @kadukkathara

    5 жыл бұрын

    Who told you idiot.

  • @munirajc3575

    @munirajc3575

    5 жыл бұрын

    @@kadukkathara everyone knows it fool

  • @amitabhgautam8503
    @amitabhgautam85035 жыл бұрын

    Mensuration is just one among million biological processes runs in human body and all are important for the sustainance of human race. How one biological processes (mensuration) forms the basis for gender discrimination?

  • @arjunramesh6050

    @arjunramesh6050

    5 жыл бұрын

    Menstruation isn't the reason for the custom

  • @munirajc3575

    @munirajc3575

    5 жыл бұрын

    What menstruating woman their is no concept of menstruating woman in Hinduism

  • @navneetyadav6105
    @navneetyadav61055 жыл бұрын

    Bananas me ndtv nai aa raha hai

  • @soumenbarman170
    @soumenbarman1705 жыл бұрын

    Specially to mr. Catholic Gorge if God is omnipresent then what needs of charch?

  • @PeaceAkaShanti
    @PeaceAkaShanti5 жыл бұрын

    Supreme Court while ruling said that article 14 supercede all other articles including article 25 and 26. Right to equality given under article 14 of Indian law. it is one of the fundamental right. It ensure the guarantees to every person the right to equality before law & equal protection of the laws .it is not only right of Indian citizens but also right of non-citizens .article 14 says “The state shall of India.” article 14 define no one is above the law. All are equal in eye of law. 1.1 Equality before law “The state shall not deny to any person equality before the law.

  • @prabhatsingh6178

    @prabhatsingh6178

    5 жыл бұрын

    What about only boys school and only girls school... Right to equality..

  • @MrDarksly3r
    @MrDarksly3r2 ай бұрын

    I don't know who is debating what

  • @pravingattani
    @pravingattani5 жыл бұрын

    Gargi, fantastic job!

  • @kumanet99
    @kumanet995 жыл бұрын

    The reason why people protest in sabarimalai is indian faith, culture, the identity of kerala custom, that they belief in, was distorted by SC who din't understand perfectly. In a scenario of such disagreements Its better to get rid of all religions. People can leave together peacefully, without religion.What is important is, spirituality that teaches to be good humans, not religion which is often misunderstood as good for believers. Religion should be banned but spirituality should prevail and that's what human needs. That's why it is important to understand religion in its totality. Today the wise and civilized intellects are rejecting religion, in many countries except Arabic countries. They are the 3rd popular in numbers in the word as i understand. , Religion has many segments, with in it.Scripture improvised many times by men, A GOD only for the believers, heaven and hell just to create fear in the minds of the ignores, spirituality, rituals,admin.good and bad management systems that forces to covert etc. It is the management system that right thinking people are fed up. All these together is call religion. Arahamic religions are the worse when it says, mine is better then yours so convert to mine.Discrimination in disguise. Hinduism does not fall into this dirty trap. There is no enforcement at any level.

  • @9godspeed
    @9godspeed5 жыл бұрын

    lol...the mentality is coming from western perspective...understanding temple as a church and is only for worship or prayer...rituals can not be defined as somple prayers...

  • @anilkumar4017
    @anilkumar40175 жыл бұрын

    people like that from banglore has demeaned lord ayyappa .....he is hindu taliban

  • @soumenbarman170
    @soumenbarman1705 жыл бұрын

    What is baptism mr. Catholic?

  • @ashishbarla5178

    @ashishbarla5178

    5 жыл бұрын

    Baptism is a process to accept someone into Christianity, a baby is being baptized with the parents around, whereas an adult is being baptized very strictly under the impression that he/she perfectly knows all the prayers, you can't just embrace Christianity with a blink of an eye, there is no shortcuts to Baptism (except if you are a toddler and your parents allow the process to take place)

  • @prabhusreehari
    @prabhusreehari5 жыл бұрын

    Such a biased panel itself shows what the propaganda of NDTV is... At least try to include a panel which represent both sides

  • @dbeacon159
    @dbeacon1595 жыл бұрын

    Ndtv anti Hindu..... Ndtv won't call advocate deepak, deepa easwar, rahul easwar, padma pillai, tamilmani, muralidharan...... If ndtv talks about equality...... They should have called this people.... The anchor who talks about sabarimala, doesn't know anything about south India....

  • @dbeacon159

    @dbeacon159

    5 жыл бұрын

    @anju21june oh really, Joker is commenting about jokes....

  • @20shourya

    @20shourya

    5 жыл бұрын

    D BEACON actually rahul Easwar was on ndtv earlier in the week dumb bhakt. Padma pillai too has been on their shows numerous times. Doesn't change the fact the right wing extremists are sexist, racist and outdated.

  • @9godspeed

    @9godspeed

    5 жыл бұрын

    @anju21june so does they at all biased one sided debates by NDTV

  • @Iamlatha

    @Iamlatha

    5 жыл бұрын

    People belonging to regressive religions who hate & talk nonsense about other religions are in galore in India because we are a tolerant country. Let these morons comment against the retrogressive religion practised in Saudi Arabia or Pakistan & come back alive.

  • @20shourya

    @20shourya

    5 жыл бұрын

    India is a democracy unlike those joker countries, so we are right to expect higher standards from our country, andh bhakt.

  • @sanjsin
    @sanjsin5 жыл бұрын

    Untouchability is rampant in india, now upper caste women realising , i welcome this move

  • @parimalaparthasarathy1430
    @parimalaparthasarathy14305 жыл бұрын

    Parimala Parthasarathy Pinarayi trying to hurt people's feelings, media giving false information, brainy people in debate who pretend like they don't understand traditions are all responsible for sufferings in Kerala. Have some mercy for other people's sufferings boss, even animals are better than us human beings. Leave alone woman, ashamed to be a human being

  • @Reddylion
    @Reddylion5 жыл бұрын

    Ban triple talaq and females below 10 and above 50 indeed enter bramhacharis temple.. Jai hind.

  • @amitmehta4491
    @amitmehta44915 жыл бұрын

    Deity doesn't need women of certain age why these women's want to go their... Women have some self-respect

  • @amitmehta4491

    @amitmehta4491

    5 жыл бұрын

    @anju21june it's the custom from long time it's not discrimination it's precaution .why fanatic liberals have to go their who do not even believe in the same religion

  • @prabhatsingh6178
    @prabhatsingh61785 жыл бұрын

    Did you hear the woman judge of Supreme Court..

  • @prabhatsingh6178

    @prabhatsingh6178

    5 жыл бұрын

    @anju21june A woman says that a woman judge of Supreme Court has no value.. and still Cryin for women rights.. Kon si nasal ka charas lete hai ese log..

  • @PeaceAkaShanti

    @PeaceAkaShanti

    5 жыл бұрын

    Indu Malhotra gave a dissent opinion . The ruling was 4-1 for women’s entry. That’s what matter. We should applaud men who had privilege over centuries and want to extend that to fellow human beings.

  • @prabhatsingh6178

    @prabhatsingh6178

    5 жыл бұрын

    Respecting diversity The media and society would do well not to politicise or bring any ‘-ism’ or ideology to the temple. This is not a debate about the left or right for feminism. Just like the Attukal Devi temple, hailed as a ‘women’s Sabarimala’, which has found a place in the Guinness Book of World Records as a temple that attracts the largest congregation of women, Sabarimala too has some unique customs and systems. Uniqueness is the soul of every temple. Lakhs of women congregate in Sabarimala every year. There is only one caveat: they should not be between 10 and 50, because of the specific nature of the Prathishta(idol) and the vow celibacy associated with the idol. Let us respect these diversities as India is the land of pluralism and multiple paths to the divine reality

  • @jayaprakashbalan2510
    @jayaprakashbalan25105 жыл бұрын

    Naidu's point is correct. Why is the SC mum if anybody has violated the SC verdict and constitution. Why has SC not taken cognizance of it. It means SC is not of the same view which everybody is universally telling that SC verdict is getting violated by protestors not following it. There is definitely a confusion on this. It means like the PM and BJP/ RSS leaders, the SC also believes that everybody has right to protest against SC decision and not follow it blindly. So, it becomes easily double standards of the ruling Govt. BJP/RSS and all the so called patriotic nationalist, may be even of law. Because when people do not follow SC verdict and that too not just about following, but even blatantly throwing away SC order by indulging in protests and devotees not allowing any women to easily enter Sabarimala, on the other hand when students of JNU was having debate and discussion and coming to an opinion on SC verdict on the hanging of Afzal Guru, then they were filed under sedition and anti-national charges strongly by the Ruling Govt., its ministers, all the national media, all the so called nationalists/ patriots and the court had accepted the case. What do a common person understand or judge from that? What should then the people who protest against entry of women in Sabarimala be called. They are more anti-nationals and law/constitution unabiding citizens of the country because they not only followed inequality and untouchability but also created unrest, violence in public life. Should the court not take note of it?

  • @Iamlatha
    @Iamlatha5 жыл бұрын

    US would not interfere in the Church practises & declare that there should be women priests & bishops. *That* is secularism - leaving religions to decide what they want - *non interference in religious matters is the true core value of secularism* which this blasted media, shameless SC or the political parties would never talk about. Because caste & communal politics is your bread & butter - because you people are extremely communal & wouldn't let anybody in a corner practising their religion peacefully to do so. You aryans are violent & want to destroy the peace of South India as well. Shame. Now let us come to SC MeLords' verdict which is sacrosanct & nobody in a free democracy even has the right to protest against according to you Sanjay Hegde, AGCFSPN (anoop george chaudhari feroz Singh Pandey Nair) & such *regressive* libtards. PILs were filed by RSS imagining all KErala women would vote for BJP which backfired. They wanted to withdraw the PIL. *It was refused by the blasted SC*. They threw away *the freedom to act* enshrined in the *constitution*. Those who were against this verdict like the KErala judge Justice Kurian Joseph were removed from the bench & replaced by *compliant* judges, thereby ensuring a match fixing by the ex CJI Deepak Mishra who had narrowly escaped an impeachment motion passed by 75 sitting MPs. This is what happens when politics plays a role everywhere. We care 2 hoots for this fake judgement.

  • @themeena4904
    @themeena49045 жыл бұрын

    WHAT ABOUT men who is also impure by mind nd their actions

  • @vaishnavbhaskar3062

    @vaishnavbhaskar3062

    5 жыл бұрын

    the meena no impure men ever went to Sabarimala

  • @PeaceAkaShanti

    @PeaceAkaShanti

    5 жыл бұрын

    Senthuuran True rest of men’s celibacy is to maintain it in the presence of women around them. Also, why is the onus to guard men’s or diety’s celibacy in woman.. that’s akin to have woman wear Burkha to prevent men from sexual promiscuity.

  • @munirajc3575

    @munirajc3575

    5 жыл бұрын

    So let's ban all ladies club than no pink busses. No ladies toilet either

  • @munirajc3575

    @munirajc3575

    5 жыл бұрын

    So let's ban all ladies club than no pink busses and no ladies toilet either

  • @munirajc3575

    @munirajc3575

    5 жыл бұрын

    So whoever is going to sabarimala returns pure. But normally every one are pure minded who go their. Other wise who can do 41 days bhramhacharya vratham

  • @aniruddhajoshi2841
    @aniruddhajoshi28415 жыл бұрын

    It is a rectification ritual and not purification rituals. When a temple law is broken, the ritual is done, be it a man, woman, child, animal or even the the tantri himself.

  • @kravikiran9308
    @kravikiran93085 жыл бұрын

    First of all, call some south Indians who have some knowledge about this temple and rituals or else most of you have not got even 20% knowledge about the issue. When brahmacharya is followed certain rules are followed by diety and diety has rights. You are not a devotee if you don't follow your lords' instructions. In sthala purana and other epic it is clearly mentioned. Can you prove the existence of god for that matter.

  • @jayaprakashbalan2510
    @jayaprakashbalan25105 жыл бұрын

    Its an historical shameless thing that has happened in Sabarimala or insulting to all the women of our country that purification was done after two women entered Sabarimala. Surprising why the women from all over India didn't come out against that or protest against that. How are women expecting equality when they cannot even voice against insult to their identity. Progressive women and those who believe that they are human beings and not just some item, should be protesting against BJP/RSS and groups like Nair Samajam and remember that as long as these people are in power, they would never be considered equal and they will rule their rights wherever male especially patriarchal dominance is there. Now its upto them because good and progressive men can't keep on fighting for them always. Women should understand that just dressing up stylishly or having an independent career with an income doesn't mean that they would get respect and equality and identity which is what every women needs. It is to show up, support, protest and voice their opinion in such issues only which will get them identity and gain them respect step by step. Even God would not have believed that there is something like purification created by people against women. Had he seen the exploitation of women happenign in this earth and the way she is suppressed and weakedn, he would probably have not created women with all the good traits gifted to her.

  • @nirmalkumar-rl3df

    @nirmalkumar-rl3df

    5 жыл бұрын

    Well said. The opposition to entry of women is kept alive bcos of elections.

  • @kdnn5375
    @kdnn53755 жыл бұрын

    Live as you wish in good.

  • @kdnn5375
    @kdnn53755 жыл бұрын

    Discrimination, untouchability is a crime,what's called purity or purification ? When your heart and thoughts are not clean,is need purity.Tanthri must be penalized and be jailed.

  • @tapaskar6823
    @tapaskar68235 жыл бұрын

    excuse me Sabarimala is about purification of the deity who is an eternal brahmacharya and wishes to maintain a distance from women. Where are menstruation and untouchability coming in the first place? It's deeply provocative and affects the faith of the devotees. Is it difficult to understand that every temple has its own philosophy no which it stands? It has nothing and absolutely nothing to do with equality as there happens to be no discrimination in the first instance. Exclusion is not discrimination always sometimes its positive differentiation! I don't understand the level of miscommunication, misquotations and misinterpretation prevailing among our greatest journalist! I want to know something on a serious note! Chicken is served as a prasadam in few Kolkata temples so should we now start imposing that on hanuman mandir of Delhi? How ridiculous is that? You cannot cherry-pick facts and figures and interpret according to your morality. I also don't comprehend this ultra-modern argument. Religion is not about rational its about experience about how people perceive it for ages! Let me ask these well educated knowledgeable adults something fundamental to Sabarimala. Bible reminds us that Mary is virgin now if I so omg how is this logical, how can a virgin bear child? I mean of course it won't make sense, we cant debate on everything ... its a belief and we gotta respect that, logical or not, rational or not is not really something we should discuss on. SC in the review petition reversed the earlier decision that jallikattu should cease to exist. Now, why did that happen? Santhara the Jain ritual of fast unto death was upheld by SC stating "we won't interfere in the religious matter". Then how is Sabarimala different? Please Enlighten me on that, the propagators of the golden age in India. As Justice, Indu Malhotra on her dissenting opinion bravely pointed out as the sole judge that judges should not poke their nose in religious beliefs of people until that has a socially detrimental effect like Sati or Child Marriage in which case the courts can adjudicate even if it's going on for decades. I cannot understand how not going to Sabarimala have any detrimental effect on anyone! Like I said it's not about discrimination or equality it's about a belief and a faith of exclusion! So If anyone can enlighten me on that? P.S- 8000 women and men all on streets of Kerala protesting against the Sabarimala verdict are neither ignorant of gender segregation or are they fools!

  • @munirajc3575

    @munirajc3575

    5 жыл бұрын

    Yeah right great👏👏👏👏

  • @meoowthunder2038
    @meoowthunder20385 жыл бұрын

    Ashanti kowtla a atheist she can't comment on faith of others

  • @meoowthunder2038
    @meoowthunder20385 жыл бұрын

    Before India before constitution before India's first government sabrimala women are banned

  • @Jayader2
    @Jayader25 жыл бұрын

    people having no sense about the real reason and about the temples of especially south india ,just rattling with words ....what a shame ..please stop

  • @meoowthunder2038
    @meoowthunder20385 жыл бұрын

    If SC told u not to wear clothes will u follow

  • @ashokpatwa1218
    @ashokpatwa12185 жыл бұрын

    For the good argument we have to understand Sabrina itself

  • @siddharthsarkate9014
    @siddharthsarkate90145 жыл бұрын

    Anchor is very poorly handling the issue. Only disappointed. She could have done it better than she did. There needed to be stronger questions.

  • @samislerin
    @samislerin5 жыл бұрын

    Hey people y can't you understand and follow simple rule if no women of a particular age group not allowed in a place cause may be anything but that which has been going on for hundreds of years and that which you like to change in the name of feminism and naming it as religious discrimination has always existed y do u guys want to poke your nose where it doesn't belong. If you don't know your culture then go to hell with you nonsense thoughts.just read the scriptures and understand y a place of worship won't allow women who menstruate just read the fact first before you utter your blabbering....

  • @vinodkumarkumar9375
    @vinodkumarkumar93755 жыл бұрын

    If there r 30 cr womens with different beliefs will Supreme court give 30 cr decesion

  • @ankitjha96
    @ankitjha964 жыл бұрын

    Missing sai deepaks arguments here

  • @mattking3495
    @mattking34955 жыл бұрын

    I will pray to Lord Ayyappa to teach a lesson to these stupid dimits like Gargi, George-Chaudhury (what a stupid name in itself), Sanjay Hegde, Ms. Menon etc. Sharanam Ayyappa!

  • @abhigna_talakeri
    @abhigna_talakeri5 жыл бұрын

    26:00 👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍

  • @vinodkumarkumar9375
    @vinodkumarkumar93755 жыл бұрын

    One question to all womens. Will u worship while you are in mensurating period. If yes than i am ok with your belief if NO then have debate on this as well becouse these are also ritual if we need to worship in this period or not

  • @m2kl619
    @m2kl6195 жыл бұрын

    madhavi menon good talk

  • @chanakyan288
    @chanakyan2885 жыл бұрын

    All gods are perceptions of divine .. personified as deities in temples. It is not a prayer hall.. mind it. Meaning of temple and deity is fulfilled as per the customs set for the temple. Every temple is built for that purpose. Especially in Kerala which many North indians may not understand. Kerala temples are very different.. there is purpose.. mind it. Visit the kerala temples and experience it yourself. In Sabarimala, it is the Sadhana of 41 days vrat to fulfil. It is a prescription for men. There are many temples and rituals prescribed for woman too.. Once you start vrat, wear a MALA, wear black dress for self awareness of vrat and he becomes SWAMI. Should lead satvika life till 41 days. Only satvik food ( no drink,smoke, non-veg, too much spicy foods all avoided). He must talk in mean language. Dont wear chappals. And stay away from woman. Men dont sleep with wife during vrat. This is 41 days vrat Re-sets life of men and they come back with peace of mind. All bad habits are re-set. Now, why only YOUNG woman should not go there.... It is a prescription for men only.. simple. When husband and wife go together, doesn't have the meaning of vrat. Thats the prescription. There are lot many other temples where there is no such restriction. It is only a prescription, sky wont fall down if woman go there.... Why some woman want to disrupt the temple tradition and atmosphere.. leave it alone please.. It is not causing any problems to you ladies ,right ?.. please..

  • @VIKASSINGH-zx4ln
    @VIKASSINGH-zx4ln5 жыл бұрын

    1. Why this ndtv anchor is very intrested to snatch mike quickly only from those few people who appear to have faith in lord ayappa. 2. Why studio panelists((alredy seated against lord ayappa)) who are interrupting when BJP person and lord ayappa supporter are speaking. On other hand BJP person and lord ayappa supporter are never interrupting when studio panelists speak. Anchor Gargi is also not stopping when studio panelist are interrupting. 3. Ndtv anchor has alredy seated most peoples beside her to support her. To make genral opinion that people who belive in lord ayappa are anarchy. Sorry Gargi Rawat but I have this persona that I also understand the gestures of attitude of people while listening. I understood you too who was trying to snatch mike as soon as they keep there point of view from sabrimala supporters , and you gave ample amount of time to people who were against sabrimala practice. Ndtv has biased view against hindus everybody knows.....but atleast let the debates be unbiased to have true view of any issue.

  • @kdnn5375
    @kdnn53755 жыл бұрын

    Dalith people are being treated very badly in every government institutions....

  • @munirajc3575
    @munirajc35755 жыл бұрын

    Stop u r nonsense women devotees are with preserving sabarimala traditions. U feminist are cooking up concept of impurity and untouchablilty. How do you call these feminist devotees when they are going against lord ayyappa

  • @mumbainan
    @mumbainan5 жыл бұрын

    Deliberate attempt to make it about menstruation and untouchability by NDTV, anti Hindu as usual. Ayyappa Swamy at Sabarimala temple is worshipped as a Brahmachari and hence the restriction on women aged 10-50 entering this temple. No such rule is there in any other Ayyappa temple except this one.

  • @prasadc7599
    @prasadc75995 жыл бұрын

    What is essential... your essentially is differ from others

  • @munirajc3575
    @munirajc35755 жыл бұрын

    So let's ban all ladies club than no pink busses and no ladies toilet either

  • @mattking3495
    @mattking34955 жыл бұрын

    Hey Sanjay baba Hegde. Since you like to quote US constitution and Supreme Courts a lot, I have a question. You talk about Constitutions being transformative BUT has the United States Supreme Court been able to BAN guns? Joker Hegde, answer me dude!

  • @mahakaalmahakaal3073
    @mahakaalmahakaal30735 жыл бұрын

    If you are non-devotee you have no rights for temple entry. If you are a devotee you will certainly get a abided by temple traditions. Where is the controversy?

  • @munirajc3575
    @munirajc35755 жыл бұрын

    We will do all purification required who asked your opinion

  • @91239
    @912395 жыл бұрын

    Are they talking about sabarimala?they don't know the basics of temple... Law faith.. Haha.

  • @krishnamurthyrao3039
    @krishnamurthyrao30395 жыл бұрын

    Please give lesson to the anchor what purification means. Let her not imagine as what she is thinking within her limited knowledge. Shame on these nonsense debates.

  • @prithivirajnandakumar8538
    @prithivirajnandakumar85385 жыл бұрын

    Waste of time ndtv. Whom are you trying to impress?

  • @prasadc7599
    @prasadc75995 жыл бұрын

    You.... people just are waste..... I will tell you why..you are asking why thantry did the purification after the woman's entety.. that is bcs of it is against the current temple practice in sabarimala.. sc said only that all age group woman should be allowed.... but the court did not said the all the temple practices in sabarimala are wrong and illegal... so you can again file a pil to sc to declare all the temple practices are wrong and should be re-written by a sitting sc 5 bunch jundge.. we the poor people the will follow that rule...

  • @sunilankorottil7763
    @sunilankorottil77635 жыл бұрын

    Sabarimala

  • @prasadc7599
    @prasadc75995 жыл бұрын

    None of this tv discussion panels mambers are aware about the sabarimala and its history of the deaty loard ayyappa. this people only interest in discussing menstruation and bleading..and it is very private thing.. don't waste others time by discussing in public forum....better you people do one thing..Please change the pose of deity ayyappa.... the whole problem is their... if their is disease better do treat the cause not the disease.....you can also file a pil to change the deity also... bcs in our country sc is the final word even in religious practice

  • @kdnn5375
    @kdnn53755 жыл бұрын

    No gods is above the constitution. Iyappa is just nothing before supreme court verdict. Citizens to honour the verdict.

  • @munirajc3575

    @munirajc3575

    5 жыл бұрын

    God the creator is supreme. How can constitution be above God. Some idiots like u only can say such things. We

  • @kgmuralidharan07
    @kgmuralidharan075 жыл бұрын

    The people other than Kerala who have no business to interfere and do not understand the cultures and traditions of malayali Hindus. The left front government have their own agenda and thoughts for that place and are carrying it out. Look at the many devious methods they have adopted to enter the shrine and break the traditions. A government is known to be by the people of the people and for the people. Do you think this left government has acted for the people as an elected representative of theirs in this regard. In the other bodies of faith they never interfere because they are quite sure they will get back the stick while Hindus generally accep it tamely. This time it is different. The left government have some thing up their sleeve. Let us all wait and watch.

  • @nirmalkumar-rl3df

    @nirmalkumar-rl3df

    5 жыл бұрын

    Kerala is in India and the government in Kerala, be it Left or Right, is bound by SC verdict.

  • @sonuthomas9279
    @sonuthomas92795 жыл бұрын

    stupid one sided argument. misinformation

  • @siddhantmishra7867
    @siddhantmishra78673 жыл бұрын

    पूरे देश का जितना नास्तिक है उसका यह पूरा प्रयास है कि सबरीमाला में महिलाएं जाएं जितनी महिलाएं भक्त है वह एक भी नहीं जाएंगे जितनी नास्तिक है मंदिरों से नफरत करती हैं वह जरूर जाएंगे

  • @jun2011jh
    @jun2011jh5 жыл бұрын

    Worship the CREATOR and not HIS Creations .

  • @jun2011jh

    @jun2011jh

    5 жыл бұрын

    @M Nair so now pig an animal included in the large list. Lageraho

  • @suhaskrishna99
    @suhaskrishna995 жыл бұрын

    Fake news NDTV

  • @AbhishekSharma-mi6zo
    @AbhishekSharma-mi6zo5 жыл бұрын

    Its about women who have reproductive capabilities not women who are mensturating!!

  • @bnghuman2193
    @bnghuman21935 жыл бұрын

    Bullshiit ... due to these politician huminity ll end soon in india ..

  • @Reddylion

    @Reddylion

    5 жыл бұрын

    Bəıng Human hmm

  • @vinodkumarkumar9375
    @vinodkumarkumar93755 жыл бұрын

    Purification of ritual is also right of devotee mam who believe in ayappa and they have right to worship as per Constitution of which on part u r talking about untouchability so who will talk about right of devotee. It is there belief that womens were not to entered now they have right to worship as they wish becouse its there right

  • @binodyadav5050
    @binodyadav50505 жыл бұрын

    What a trivial issue. There are temples where men not allowed, no issue. But here more than hindu women its other caste women are concerned.

  • @rahulyadav7461
    @rahulyadav74615 жыл бұрын

    I don't buy stoping someone from taking water etc.

  • @sanjsin
    @sanjsin5 жыл бұрын

    Trust in ayyappa, he is not rapist like rss bjp guyz, is he?

  • @vaishnavbhaskar3062

    @vaishnavbhaskar3062

    5 жыл бұрын

    Sanjeev Sinha dude is that a statement or a question......and how come eda became rapists suddenly

  • @vaishnavbhaskar3062

    @vaishnavbhaskar3062

    5 жыл бұрын

    RSS *

  • @gokulvshetty
    @gokulvshetty Жыл бұрын

    Women who enter should be charged for the purification process then it is fine

  • @kumanet99
    @kumanet995 жыл бұрын

    The reason why people protest in sabarimalai is indian faith, culture, the identity of kerala custom, that they belief in, was distorted by SC who din't understand perfectly. In a scenario of such disagreements Its better to get rid of all religions. People can leave together peacefully, without religion.What is important is, spirituality that teaches to be good humans, not religion which is often misunderstood as good for believers. Religion should be banned but spirituality should prevail and that's what human needs. That's why it is important to understand religion in its totality. Today the wise and civilized intellects are rejecting religion, in many countries except Arabic countries. They are the 3rd popular in numbers in the word as i understand. , Religion has many segments, with in it.Scripture improvised many times by men, A GOD only for the believers, heaven and hell just to create fear in the minds of the ignores, spirituality, rituals,admin.good and bad management systems that forces to covert etc. It is the management system that right thinking people are fed up. All these together is call religion. Arahamic religions are the worse when it says, mine is better then yours so convert to mine.Discrimination in disguise. Hinduism does not fall into this dirty trap. There is no enforcement at any level.