"How my character is supposed to get laid if I have to ask for consent ?" Never seen a flag redder than this one.

@Voidi-Void

4 ай бұрын

A goddamn soviet parade.

@hasseo195

4 ай бұрын

Scarlet red^^

@Enclavefakesoldier

4 ай бұрын

That flag is redder than a red dragon being caught in the shower naked.

@TigerW0lf

4 ай бұрын

CRIMSON!

@NaliTikva

4 ай бұрын

It's a game. It's a duck, ducks are known to r*pe.

Story 2: The fact that that guy considers consent "woke" is actually kind of scary

@AmaryInkawult

4 ай бұрын

Consent is important when it isn't weaponized in court. Like that guy in college who had consent REVOKED when he realized he wasn't as into her as he believed and broke up. That is when consent becomes bullshit. When scornful people claim they were SA when they originally gave consent and were fully aware of what was going on. Being drunk, I could understand. However when you're sober? Nah you're fucking people over both literally and figuratively. Do not get me wrong, consent is incredibly important. Otherwise SA wouldn't exist. But damn when I see the false accusation rate rising it becomes frustrating that stupid shits are abusing the concept to not just hurt people, but to completely uproot their entire lives and social standing over the pettiest crap.

@AmaryInkawult

4 ай бұрын

TL;DR Consent is not woke, but can be abused like any other tool

@Theokal3

4 ай бұрын

Tell me about it. This guy was a creep.

@ArcCaravan

4 ай бұрын

This has me convinced the only people who actually use the term "woke" are either using it ironically or an excuse to play victim when they're scummy.

@ArcCaravan

4 ай бұрын

​@@AmaryInkawultWell consent wasn't weaponized here.

"You mean I have to ask for consent?!?" Roughly translated means "I'll eventually be on an S offenders list."

@zeehero7280

4 ай бұрын

Which is woke af, tbh. pretty much all woketards are deranged predators in the making.

@enderbunny9245

4 ай бұрын

so true lmao!

@NaliTikva

4 ай бұрын

It's a game. It's a duck, ducks are known to r*pe. Unless he's going to turn into a antromorphic duck there is no reason he's going to be on a S offender list.

@Val-wj3vy

Ай бұрын

Or is already on it.

Duckman Story. I thought Duckman had some serious mental problems until he said "Ducks ain't Woke!". That's when I realized we were past serious mental problems and all the way into padded room territory.

@ArcCaravan

4 ай бұрын

Or just a scumbag.

@RedCrusader-ph2vk

4 ай бұрын

Anyone who thinks consent is woke needs to be on a watchlist

@markjohnston8863

4 ай бұрын

@@RedCrusader-ph2vk yeah i was thining same thing. thats the craziest statement ive ever heard.

@Szriko

3 ай бұрын

@@RedCrusader-ph2vk it's pretty woke, lol. do you remember ever hearing about this nonsense before like, 5 years ago? it's just standard feminism trying to demonize men and ruin women.

The duck story just gave me an idea to make a Canadian goose arokakra barbarian with an addiction to bread as a joke character. Every time he rages he says **honk!**

@AmaryInkawult

4 ай бұрын

The most vicious of avians

@TheFuriousScribbles

4 ай бұрын

"THE GOOSE IS LOOSE! HONK! HONK!"

@9liveslie-cat-lie129

4 ай бұрын

​ goblins still tell the stories of terror of honk honk lol

@seto_kaiba_

4 ай бұрын

I LOVE that idea. Holy shit!

@lordgenerias

4 ай бұрын

For some reason, this made me imagine Jacksepticeye playing a goose arokokra barbarian😆, and when he rages, he belts out "let the hjonkening commence". True neutral, his mission in life is to collect bells, so he adventures to save up money for pretty bells he finds in shops. Whenever he wakes up, he rings the first bell he ever found while yelling "Top of Morning!" Main weapon: A large mace with a bell for the business end. This is the first bell he ever found, and he had it attached to a large iron bar so no one could easily take it from him. Or, he could be a goose arokokra wizard who specializes in summoning, and he summons flocks of spectral geese while yelling "Rise up, my brothers! The time has come to start the hjonkening!" But he mostly uses them to annoy small towns, but is actually very helpful in battle as the geese are actually Dire Geese that scale with his level. Neutral evil, he wants to make humans suffer for cooking geese for holiday dinners, but he doesn't want to actually harm anyone, so it's mostly just pranks like messing with gardeners, hiding people's slippers and other shoes, ruining their bushes, and honking at random people to surprise them. Spell focus: A hand bell that he rings while casting. When he rings it, it dispels Silence, and can use it three times per long rest.

The fact he called himself "Duckman" is offensive. There's only one Duckman I'll accept, and while he has a few issues, he's nowhere near this bad.

@AmonDevilman

4 ай бұрын

He's a bonafide gentleman compared to that creep.

@roryscott2941

4 ай бұрын

It's been some time and he was very ranchy but I'm pretty sure Duckman was all about willing ladies

@AmonDevilman

4 ай бұрын

@@roryscott2941 Yeah Duckman could be a really self absorbed jerk but he wasn't a monster.

It took him hours to come up with "Duckman who is a creep?"

Sounds like Duck soup going to be on the menu at that Inn.

Story 2: Yeah that guy is scary. The fact that he made a character based off of SA is terrifying…

@MortusVanDerHell

4 ай бұрын

For "hours", he said. What took someone so long in this BS to take HOURS with this ?! O.o

@GarkKahn

3 ай бұрын

For most people animals never ask for consent except for a few exceptions, so what took him so long to find out if ducks do or don't and then create that thing?

Second story: We should be glad that Daffy or Donald aren't like that.

@finnmchugh99

4 ай бұрын

Or Howard

@GarkKahn

3 ай бұрын

I wouldn't be surprised if Hollywood gets shocked by another celebrity scandal

We need to look into duckman that guy is 100% doing this out of game and need to be under the prison

@josephlinden1630

Ай бұрын

Yeah monitor him to see he doesn’t do anything bad because he seems suspect but you can’t guarantee he’s actually doing it. I’d hope he’d be able to separate real life from fantasy.

Story 2: if Geese are the Sworn enemy of Ducks and all ducks are R*pists then I totally Side with the Geese...

@averycheesypotato

4 ай бұрын

Geese are incredibly loyal, monogamous partners to each other, as are swans. They also make excellent guard “dogs”

@HunglikeBDP

Ай бұрын

Geese just choose violence for the heck of it,life is just a game of GTA for em.

Was bar-maid also a Duck-Woman? Because ducks only mate with other ducks so Duck-Man should only be looking to have struggle-snuggles with Duck-Women. BTW: What kind of warped mind do you need to possess to base a character around being a "grapist"? Fortunately for that group, the trash took itself out.

@shadiafifi54

4 ай бұрын

It gets worse; a male duck's organ's length is half their own.

@GarkKahn

3 ай бұрын

Also, why ducks? More than half of the animal kingdom don't ask for consent anyway Why did he had to be so specific?

@HarleyHerbert

3 ай бұрын

What he doesn't know is more often than not male ducks will behave this way towards other male ducks, even dead ones. I doubt he'd be too pleased if some duck man npc did it to his character. He can't complain, in his own words, "this is literally just how ducks are"

@kyriss12

2 ай бұрын

Just be glad he didn’t role up the character dolphin boy.

Why was it the very instant I heard "Duck, this player is very invested in the duck concept" did I immediately realize what they were going to want to do with it?

@Oddmanoutre

4 ай бұрын

Because you've seen Zefrank's 'True Facts About The Duck'?

@DanaOtken

4 ай бұрын

@@OddmanoutreNever heard of that. But it's hard not to notice a species that's evolved against making it physically easy to mate.

@Oddmanoutre

4 ай бұрын

@@DanaOtkenI'm not wholly convinced that Evard (the evil wizard from Gygax's home game) was not a duck.

Can we all just agree that?It's super sad that it took him that long to essentially make a grapist who hates geese. Like seriously.That is the peak of your character creating prowess ?

"Ducks ain't woke" is my new justification for all my bad behaviors.

@austinsams9773

4 ай бұрын

Your 2 hours late to work. DUCKS AIN'T WOKE

@Mag3.1415

3 ай бұрын

⁠”why did you run over that person?” “Ducks ain’t woke” “Ok, fair enough.”

I have a few words to say about Duckman: What the fuck. That is all.

@BlueTressym

4 ай бұрын

What the Duck.

honestly for the Duckman story...with the "for questionable reasons" i was really hoping it would've been for the duck song about a duck going to a stand or shop to ask for grapes...of course it couldn't be that for a questionable reason

I can imagine the duck player saying "let's get dangerous." every non-consensual attempt in game.

@non-applicable3548

4 ай бұрын

Yes yes yes yes yes

@Enclavefakesoldier

4 ай бұрын

Better watch out you bad boys!

@nessadvantage9447

4 ай бұрын

Thanks now you've ruined darkwing duck for me😂😂

First story: If I was in Dave’s position, I would have just told the DM no. My character wouldn’t betray the party, and even if they did, they wouldn’t be able to get an instant kill like that. They would have to roll to hit, then roll damage. Even if I did roll a crit and maximum damage that would instantly kill my fellow PC, the rest of the party would still be there and be capable of fighting back and taking me down. If the DM insisted, I would have told the other players what the DM was planning as soon as they showed up for the session. There’s no way I’d just let the DM suddenly take control of my character and turn them into a villain with god-level instant kill powers. Second story: Eww! Eww, eww, eww, eww, EWW! What a massive creep! At least the DM and the other players handled the situation well-by stopping and shutting this crap down as soon as it happened. And at least the trash took itself out. But still-EWWW!!! I can feel the bile rising in my throat from hearing that! Third story: D&D is a collaborative game. The DM controls the environment and the NPCs, and each player controls their own character. If you find yourself feeling the need to take control of someone else’s part of the game, you may want to consider the possibility that D&D is not for you and you might be better off writing stories instead. Fourth story: “oH tHaT’s JuSt HoW hE iS wE cAn’T dO aNyThInG aBoUt It Or We’Ll RuIn OuR fRiEnDsHiP-“ Bullshit. That’s just straight-up bullshit. A real friend would quit trying to sabotage the game as soon as they realized nobody but them was enjoying it. A real friend wouldn’t throw away years of friendship because of a disagreement over a pretend game. This guy is a total jerk, and the other players are just enabling him. My advice to OP would be to stand up to him yourself. If he listens and changes his behavior, great. If not, it may be time to find a different group. There are better groups out there; don’t let a bad first few experiences ruin things for you, OP! Fifth story: Yikes! That poor player! I hope they made a full recovery, and I’m glad things turned out all right for everyone else. Sixth story: Yeah, you’re right to kick him. If he wanted to play, he’d have made a character. Your campaign will run just fine with three players.

@MatthewHollow

4 ай бұрын

i agree. I like these long comments/

DM takes over... other player: He started playing your character in the campaign. OP response should have been: He is playing his character, it stopped being mine when he outed my secret and changed my class making decisions on my behalf.

@ArcCaravan

4 ай бұрын

Worked better with the OP who left over DM forcing sex content on their character and used that statement to deflect bragging about spiteful actions.

Last story: Doge has got it right. Tell the player they need to have a character ready by x date, and offer to help them if they need it. If they still can't get it done, then they obviously aren't really interested in playing, and you're better off without them.

Story #1 - I would seriously ask the DM, why he thought this would be a good idea? Drop him hard. Story #2 - No loss there. I think That Guy better get used to playing Solitaire. Story #3 - Given the DM's description of the world, I'd have had serious reservations about playing a Human under those circumstances. Clearly, that DM got so enamored with his own ideas for that Character that the Player basically became irrelevant. Story #4 - Yet again, I have to ask, WHY are they putting up with this person? OK, he's a "friend" of the DM. Some friend. If the DM can't / won't bring him in line, time to leave, and make sure the DM knows why.. Nothing else for it, really. Story #5 - Certainly an unusual way into a group. Story #6 - DM asked nicely a few times, provided plenty of time, made allowances for the intrusion of Real Life. All so That Guy can keep playing video games. DM should just drop him and carry on. If That Guy gets into a snit about being dropped, politely tell him why, but DON'T let him back in. He had plenty of chances already

@AmaryInkawult

4 ай бұрын

Story 3, yeah. It was apparent when the DM continued using the PC as a DMPC. Fucker wanted a cleric so bad he should have just made one himself rather than character jacking and essentially booting a player.

@7thsealord888

4 ай бұрын

@@AmaryInkawult Said it before, will say it again - "A DM without Players is just a dude sitting at a table talking to himself." Sounds like that DM is well on his way.

@AmaryInkawult

4 ай бұрын

@@7thsealord888 the difference between a schizophrenic and a bad DM talking to themselves is a thin veil that turns invisible when wet.

I think the first DM thought it would be cool to have a "twist" at the end but didn't realise that his twist wasn't so much a twist as a complete betrayal. So it's just another data point that M Night Shyamalan style twists work great in a book or movie but not so well in a TTRPG. And that's because with books and movies you're the audience but in a TTRPG you're the author.

I'm 100% for the exceedingly violent bad ends for characters like the duck

Intro: Hello Nipsy who looks like he saw a ghost before returning to making biscuits. Story 1: DM license revoked. That was just dumb. Story 2: Uh... at least the trash took itself out. Story 3: What? DM license revoked! This is why you communicate before you do something stupid!!! Story 4: Amusing title. "It's what my character would do." I can hear him say something like that. Story 5: WTH? Story 6: As a first time DM; communicate with the player some more before making the decision to kick. At the least find another player and have this one as a fill-in backup though the deadline idea works as well.

Duckman is going to have a REALLY hard time finding any group that'll put up with that BS, and a hard time in general if he carries those attitudes into real life. Most people don't put up with SA shenanigans, fictional or no. For the Deadline story I think Doge is being a little generous. To me not doing ANYTHING to get your character ready in a month shows a general apathy for the game. It is not like the DM hasn't reminded him to do the work. I think this player's interest is minimal at best and he will probably not be a good fit for the table.

@Djanck000

4 ай бұрын

I would really like that your comment about the Duckman story was true, but you're probably just on a bubble of awesome people. I've been playing ttrpg for a long ass time and i've seen a lot of similar behavior (and for the longest time "leaving" a table was seen as worse than being a creep). Mostly in the old days and mostly with players that were already older at the time, but as far as i know most of them still play and i don't have any reason to believe they're any better.

I've always wanted to do a duck aaracockra, but this story sours it for me.

@averycheesypotato

4 ай бұрын

Go with goose then- incredibly loyal and fierce. Or just pick a less aggressive type of duck. Wood ducks are pretty, colourful and much less violent!

@sandpiperr

Ай бұрын

I think as long as you don't try to *grape* anyone, you'll be fine.

I would had the inkeeper cast simply thunder wave. It wouldnt be so much out of nowhere, could have puched him away and is so loud, that everyone would noticed that.

The glass door story was like a modern version of an old frontier western poker game in a bar losing a player. My home state, too, so I am not surprised 😅 Also, I think Duckman was only stating half a sentence. He wasn't looking to get laid. He was looking to get laid OUT. On the pavement. Probably with a chair.

Thanks Doge, you just reminded me that I forgot to do my taxes as well.

Episode needs more kitties. I want to see Luna with the others and see how that is going.

That last story is so close to what I went through last year I'm wondering if my DM at the time didn't post it lol We had this 1 person who just adamantly refused to start on their sheet. They literally got further away from being done as time went on. Initially they had a sheet filled out irl and just needed to find it to copy it over onto dndbeyond. Then they didn't know where the sheet was but remembered most of it for them to copy over. Then they had A POSSIBLE NAME and nothing else. Like come the fuck on...! 🤬

That first story reminds me of how we fiLnished from the abyss.... we as a group were close to the end, but had decided that before we went for the grand shoot down with the demon lords, we'd go to a certain city to teach manners to the unnameable who had started the whole mess. Well, two sessions in a row, the DM used fiat to have us wake up underground and imprisoned by some creatures. In the end we had to renounce gibing the culprit his due, because the DM was in such a hurry to finish. I spent a full decade before leting that guy DM me again.

I had two betrayals in two parties. BUT in one case the writing was on the wall from session 0 and everyone knew things would end in a Tarantino bloodbath. In the other case a player was playing a moral less depressed wreck and had cleared it with the party and DM beforehand that they'd chase after the power the big bad offered like a moth chases a flame, and their PC would have an evil arc of sorts. At the end of it, the PC grew as a character when they were eventually accepted back on some kind of probation.

That dog is starring into my soul

@peytonmac1131

4 ай бұрын

Your secrets cannot be hidden from the Doge.

I'm still reeling from Mary Poppins tbh lmao

the murderhobo rogue story: if telling your "friend" to stop being an a**hole at the table will fray your "friendship", that person isn't your friend; they're a social vampire that relies on your good grace to allow them to continue being a PoS without having to face any challenge, so of course when you enable and coddle such behavior, it's just going to keep getting worse

Bro nah 💀 Duckman's Player needs to be in JAIL

I really like this Nipsy

that one story is the epitome of escalate quickly, for an assault being the way to join a game is wild though personally I don't think I'd like to join a game at the expense of a medical emergency

Oh, they will see the guy again in tge second story. In a mugshot on the news.

Mighty Ducks? More like Mighty F- Ok no! That guy crossed the line... What the hell's wrong with dude?

Now I kinda wanna run a Goose Arakokra with a well-founded mistrust of ducks

20:46 "most of them are still humans" wait... what?

Duckman flew off for green pastures on 8Chan

@kevindavis4456

4 ай бұрын

Or prison

...I was half expecting a homebrewed Duck from Runequest. In a way, I'm happy: Ducks are my favorite race in Runequest, and have one ruined through D&D would make me angry. (for those who don't know, Gloranthan Ducks are three feet tall flightless bird people that live a nomadic life in the swamps of Glorantha. They're relatively peaceful, but people who mistake that for wimpiness quickly learn the error of their ways. Oh, and they look as if someone had imported Donald Duck into a classic fantasy setting)

For the first story, I'm willing to bet the DM just finished BG3 as Durge. Because it sounded awfully familiar

Betrayal Story. Something like this could work, but not this way. Personally I have had the Quest Giver or Sage NPC that has been sending the Party out to get stuff or advising the Party on what to do turn out to be the REAL BBEG the whole time at the very end. But you don't force Players to do it. If a Player said from the beginning they wanted to do this, I might allow it. But it would still be at least a fight. And if they gave themselves away too soon, that would be their problem. This was literally a Rocks Fall moment. And there is no epicness in that.

@AvatAR42420

4 ай бұрын

Yeah, there should have at least been a boss fight and I agree that making it a friendly NPC would have been WAY better.

Last story as well as giving a deadline ask the player if character creation is too much for them if they want to start with a pre gen until they get their own character made

Duck man blocking everyone sounds like a self solving problem.

I think the DM in the first session was a Good DM since the campeign lasted a year he just needs to learn how to make a proper ending

I mean, thats kind of how ducks roll irl but I agree I wouldn't want it at my table

That's ducked up.

Nah that dude was watching Troma Return to return to nukem high on loop

Story 4: Why is everyone peacekeeping this single person?

I have to show the duckman story to a friend who loves ducks, now i understand he approves rap3 lol

Last story: There's a number of reasons for not wanting to come up with a backstory. Sometimes, you don't know if you even want to stick with a character and don't want anyone (including yourself) to get too invested in a character you'll want to change out later. Last DM I played with basically had me and a friend roll up characters and then started us out fleeing from corrupt authorities to get us used to combat and let us create our backgrounds when we were sure we were going to stick with them. So, if you _do_ want to play with them, the deadline would be a good idea, though letting them know what the team needs could also be another thing to try ( _if the team has a solid balance, then another vanguard or damage dealer wouldn't go awry_ ) as they might be paralyzed with indecision, not wanting to pick a role if it's already crowded ( _i.e. if everyone's picked vanguard..._ ) or vice versa, they might've had an idea that they want to use, but don't want to be pigeon-holed into a role they don't find interesting ( _i.e. they want to play a cleric, but not a healbot_ ). If this is the case, then if the party isn't well balanced, offer to have a barebones hired NPC who'll fill in any role for a small cut of the team loot whose cut will never be taken from the actual loot that the PCs are given so that if anyone wants to play a role can, regardless if it's already being covered. Otherwise, let them know that more damage is always useful. If they're insistent on playing but never get around to making their own character, create three possible characters for them to play that can fit multiple roles. Paladin, Druid and/or Ranger would be a solid bet if those aren't already covered, as they have a lot of variance. If he doesn't come up with a basic backstory by the start of the story, give all three of these prepped characters amnesia and have all three come in on a wagon, having survived a shipwreck or something. You can use the amnesia to cover for his lack of backstory and if he sticks around, you can fill it in as you play. Even better, you can have their first interaction be unique in that the starting battle can have the character racing in to help against a swarm of low level enemies (i.e. the player can wait until after the first round of combat to get a surprise attack on the enemies to pick what character they want and roll with it) while the other two options are largely paralyzed with confusion and indecision, only helping if attacked or if the party gets into more trouble than you thought they would be in.

I feel like in the first story Dave got let off the hook. He could have just said "No" and had that be that. You need to be comfortable enough to tell your DM "no" regarding things being spoken about out of character. If your character wouldn't do that then your character wouldn't do that, and as much as we criticize the 'thats what my character would do' type of player, the opposite is also problematic.

@karisasani7006

4 ай бұрын

In this case its a case of where that one line is considered used correctly.

Duckman has some serious issues. What I heard was, "I build my character around being a therapist" without the (the). At that point I would have told the guy he needed to walk out now or be carried out by the EMT's. That guy has either already committed a SA or is planning to do so. No sane mentally/morally balanced person does this. The last story, the absent backstory, the guy may be doing you a favor before it becomes an issue. If he is this resistant to starting the game, it seems he may also be the same with playing the game. This guy already put up [not interested] warning flags. He is either going to miss games with or without notice throughout the campaign or not be committed like you would want, like the other player have expressed they are. Examples: Not paying attention when he does show up. Not caring about missing sessions or wanting the rewards from missed sessions. Not playing as his character but like a videogame, not caring about how his actions effect the game and messing it up for the other players who are committed. I would kick him but do it this way. Contact him tell him he doesn't need to do the backstory and you're going with someone else for that spot. Apologize, saying something like, "look, you're obviously not interested. Its been a month and you still haven't put aside the time to make your backstory. How can I trust you are going to be committed to a game 3/4 hours a day on a once a week schedule if when you've already shown I can't trust you to put aside 1 hour?' Outside of that, this guy has wasted your time for what, 3 weeks? Everyone else is ready. You will be better off down 1 player than waiting for someone who doesn't want to play. As I said above, he's already shown he will be a problem. He'll either not commit by missing sessions or not be committed to playing the game by either not paying attention or playing without repercussion and generally ruining your game for the rest of the players.

Character Take Over Story. wtf. How can you declare a character "Free Now" and then tell them what to do and how to play? While this may not be a sickening horror story it is an infuriating one as it takes away Player Agency completely in one fell swoop. And I question if the DM really did think that the Player was being restricted by the Player's own choices as the DM did not consult the Player at all, so far as we are told, about how the Player felt. From this I think it was a problem, some how, for the DM and when the Player was absent that session it gave the DM an opportunity to act without the Player being able to protest. As a DM you should try and minimize anything happening to any Character whose Player is absent that session. To the best of your ability. This may mean that you end up even fudging some roles to prevent anything drastic from happening to that Character that session. Keeping that Character in the background/ supporting role if possible and having them interact only if directly questioned by another Character whose Player is there. And, if you can, have that Character doing something non-dangerous away from the Party that session all together, just so if anything really goes bad that Character is not effected. This was something I am told Gygax did in his campaigns. They would end each session back in a town and the next session would consist of only those players that showed up. With any Characters whose Players couldn't make it doing more downtime things at the town.

"Got Any Grapes?"

One minute mark let’s go!

Trash took itself out. Nothing of value was lost.

Whoa, Nipsy's a baker - check him out kneading some dough. So the DM in the first story was either David Benioff or Dan Weiss.

Story #1: Just because no one exspected the twist, dosen't mean it's a good twist.

DUCKS AINT WOKE IS THE FUCKING FUNNIEST TAKE IVE EVER HEARD 😂😂😂😂

"How is my character supposed to get laid if I have to ask for consent"? *China: Holy shit that flag is Red!*

Whenever Doge agrees with Mipsy, I keep thinking he’s about to say that he also likes the object Mipsy is playing with.

Question Mr DnD Doge, what art are you using for your thumbnails. I'm just curious, so if you don't want to answer, its fine.

could we have and extra sec ond or two with the kitty? inflation tough on recovering from psi damage

That's the problem with letting the character play evil characters, it always causes problems.

You know, if someone can't recognise and respect that different people have different interests, boundaries, and levels of tolerance for what they want in a game - particularly with sexual content and especially with violence added to it - that person has a problem. Throwing a tantrum and making vague fake-political statements isn't going to hide the fact that they *chose* to be a creep, and neither is it going to get them out of the consequences of their own actions. I bet that guy's social circle is spectacularly narrow, and that's his own damn fault.

One thing that duck guy likely doesn't know about is that male ducks are also very prolific in behaving this way towards other male ducks, even dead ones. I doubt he'd be too pleased if some duck man npc did it to his character. Maybe the DM should have done that using the guy's own justification against him, just to really show him what's like to put up with his crap. He can't complain, in his own words, "this is literally just how ducks are". He's fine if he does it but likely won't be too pleased if done to his character.

@sandpiperr

Ай бұрын

I think it's better to not deal with this in game, just tell the player "No. No one roleplays SA at my table. It's not happening! Anyone who doesn;t like it can gtfo of my house!"

I don't care how dark a campaign is but all members need to agree to the limits beforehand.

Where's the thumbnail from, it rings a bell...

Donald duck been getting... A little too silly.

The final story is basically a GM that just needs to start and see where it goes. Though I couldn't care less if a player makes a backstory. I encourage it but it's not required. As the only use that backstories have in my games is to set a players personality and motivations for themselves.

Ive seen the fact that people say that if theyre that bad at roleplaying if they have to take control of other characters, they should just write a story? Well what if they are no good at writing stories?

16:54 Personally, if it was up to me, it'd be less a sit down, and more of a public intervention where we confront him out in the open and publicly berate him for his BS.

Duckman needs some serious therapy, Geez, disgusting. At first the Duckman character was kinda interesting, but boy did that escalate quickly.

I don't have much to comment, just wanted to say: Hi how are you? Also say hi to,Lucy for me.

If "woke" is "not being a r-pist," then maybe being woke is a pretty good thing to be. Thanks Duckman you have led me to enlightenment.

For deadline: ITS BEEN A MONTH he had enough time. Maybe if he had decided on a race, or a class, a deadline would be acceptable. But he has done NOTHING

Was Mariks family name maybe Ishtar?^^

I haven't even seen the video, and I can tell the duck character is based on the horrible truth... so not cool to do.

How dare he besmirch Duckman!?

holy shit is that a talking dog

More like aaracockra, I guess

Last story: thanks for defending the procrastinator a little bit. They could have been overwhelmed by all the freedom of going at it alone for a month and just couldn't make themselves do it without a push. Human brains are weird.

Wow… This episode was seriously ducked up

I am torn on the whole "no consent" in role playing. If a person plays themselves or identifies with their character, that is a huge red flag. By i have role played as a djinn who considers opinions, desires, and by definition consent of any mortal of this universe. I have not raped anybody, but if for whatever reason i would need to be romantic with anybody, there would need to be thousand hours of role play for my character to even consider the possibility of taking thoughts of humans into reasoning.

So Duckman was trying to be a hardcore version of Zeus?

@DataDrain02

4 ай бұрын

So.... Just Zeus, then.

as a duck owner, yeah ducks do that and worse... honestly!

6:30 It really dismays me how many DnD horror story channels report players using the game to live out their repa fantasies. It's not all the time, but that I've heard it happening 9 or 10 times is still really dismaying.

@ArcCaravan

4 ай бұрын

Some people want to take the freedom of TTRPGs too far.

@starofjustice1

4 ай бұрын

@@ArcCaravanIt ain't even that. It's that this is undeniably a premeditated decision they made, with intention to do it in front of not only his table, but anyone who could hear them if they were playing somewhere public.

@thereseemstobeenanerror1219

4 ай бұрын

​@@starofjustice1 People like that tend to assume that their interests aren't really all that strange. While anyone who expresses disgust either doesn't understand or is prude. I mean, take people who enjoy lollicon, for example. You'll see them swearing up-and-down that it's not weird to enjoy something like that. Throwing out innate arguments and then acting like you're the problem, when you continue to express disgust at their fetish.

@starofjustice1

4 ай бұрын

@@thereseemstobeenanerror1219 And that's what dismays me. That there are people who think there's nothing wrong with sharing a repa fantasy with anyone who can hear. Not getting help for that.

ahhh I love to see a Black family in Japan!! Experiencing more than the messy USA

did he base this character off of the Jason Alexander Duckman?

chocolate peanut butter fudge

It might sound like a dick move, i’m fully aware of this, but in the first story I wouldn’t ask that DM not to come to the next campaign. I’d, on the other hand, just start a new campaign behind that DM’s back and if he finds out about the new campaign it doesn’t matter. He’s not welcome at the table anyway for pulling that shit without even thinking of asking if the player/s if they’re cool with it first.

8:48 Uh no you shouldn't have to say that in a session zero, this situation only comes up if the other person is psychotic. lol "Ducks ain't woke", Jesus Christ