in the news scroll, "Grad student really hoping those physics Wikipedia pages are up to date" is a personal callout.

@rhoddryice5412

2 жыл бұрын

I’ve been listening to this on my phone. Suppose I’ll have to watch it again mor closely.

They said physicists had no sense of humour.... Then they watched this and realized it was worse than their worst nightmares 🤣

@isonlynameleft

2 жыл бұрын

😆 Yes! It's like watching a train wreck in slow motion 🙈

@StevenLockey

2 жыл бұрын

@@RobRutherford More like QCD cos it's at the same time funny and oh my god so not funny superposition 🤣

This is the best particle physics debate since "The Quark Liberation Front" lost their valiant struggle and had to settle for the consolation of having the cooler T-shirt.

@brianadams5996

2 жыл бұрын

What comes around goes around. Many have thought true that which turned out to be false. So like time and love, belief is a man made concept which spans the infinite possibilities. It's like saying, 'go up.' Black and white are at both ends of the continuum simultaneously because the continuum is a circle. So you racists remember that. Not you. Just like smoke is light on one side and dark on the other simultaneously. The sun sets and rises as one. These intellectual types make me chuckle. Both are wrong and will die defending it. Think back to arguments about flat earth. Are we rotating as a ball or a frisbee? We have supposedly went to space and can't agree on this. I say both are possible. What if a dome were over the earth? From inside the outside would look curved. Does anyone believe the moon was captured or created by an interaction with the earth still? It is impossible for that to have happened because the moon would be spinning either way from the earths rotation. If it hit the earth and then was made from that collision both would either spin or would not spin. And why is the moon rusting? Take heart. We haven't been right about one scientific prediction in all of human history and we are the intelligent ones? Really? I chuckle at our hubris and arrogance. I don't know if God will find it as humorous as i do. God bless. Remember intelligence and stupidity are at opposite ends of the continuum. I think.

@Kotagiri2

2 жыл бұрын

'Quark liberation front.' Splitters.

@sumeshrajurkar5922

2 жыл бұрын

That's great. Whichever side wins or loses, it is a gain for knowledge. 👍👍

I would like to NOTE that sterile neutrinos are NOT a fourth kind of neutrino. We are not positing a 4th neutrino field in the nature; Sterile neutrinos are only right chiral counterparts of the (left chiral) neutrinos we already observed; It is not a new field; It is only a new kind of oscillation in an existing (3 neutrino) field(s) and thus do NOT violate the symmetry of the SM as Eleonore claims; Finding and confirming existence of sterile neutrinos would be similar to finding right chiral electrons, which indeed exist and are also the reason electrons have mass (via the Higgs mechanism)

@promethium-145

2 жыл бұрын

Interesting comment! But how could we detect them? Those slippery bastards!

The news ticker was hilarious! Walk the planck puns, Heisenberg uncertainly drop-outs, just awesome. I was very sad to see it end. And, having received a second-degree burn from a hot pocket, I completely agree.

@enterprisesoftwarearchitect

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah, I had to watch the video TWICE because of the ticker - good for your view minutes metric on KZread. You put lotsa effort into this one! No props needed.

@Allan_aka_RocKITEman

2 жыл бұрын

That blurb in the ticker about replacing the sun with bananas has a certain _a-peel_ to it...😉

@causewaykayak

Жыл бұрын

Yes, brilliant !

I was struggling between focusing on the debate and the hilarious “breaking news” bits😂 Amazing job Kirsty👏 Love this one.

It’s hard to pay attention to the video because the physics puns in the bottom news scroll are so funny.

@andreweller1953

2 жыл бұрын

Drove me crazy too, had to watch it twice, once for the content, once for the jokes.

@kilimanjarocruz660

2 жыл бұрын

I had to watch it twice! Absolute gold

@antoniomonteiro1203

2 жыл бұрын

I had missed them too. They are very funny! My prefered one is the upgrade of the LHC by adding a headphone jack!

@Ava31415

2 жыл бұрын

What video? It faded out before the final punch line.... we should be told!

I watched two times to catch all the jokes, and it was worth it

@harriehausenman8623

2 жыл бұрын

dito!

Getting real Brass Eye vibes from that news ticker, bravo!

"Muon sues for emotional damages after being repeatedly referred to as 'a fat electron'." Brilliant.

Damn you have to watch the video twice one for the video and the other for the bottom scrolling, gald that I watched twice!

"New upgrade to the Large Hadron Collider will have a headphone jack". OMG 😂

I like the debate style... That really drives home how much data we need to verify a theory. I love how you muted them! 😂

What I ordered: an interesting discussion of particle physics What I got: the most intense starting contest I’ve ever had

Science KZreads third most popular particle physics debate show on Tuesdays lol

Wow what a cool way to present this topic! Look forward to more of these type of friendly debates.

I don't think neutrinos were "predicted". They were "postulated".

@liamroche1473

2 жыл бұрын

They were predicted as a consequence of conservation laws - certain particle interactions did not add up.

The update of Quark Colours on the ticker is just... :Chef Kiss:

The news ticker cracked me up! :D Thanks for making my day brighter!

I don't understand what difference it makes if they osscilate, but I love how Elena says "neutrino".

1. Was so mesmerized by the crawl that I didn't listen to the speakers. No idea if they were at all serious. 2. Are the neutrinos sterile because of unethical government testing in the mid-Twentieth Century?

@rhoddryice5412

2 жыл бұрын

I think you need sterile neutrinos to create banananana/vanillilla flavoured quantum ice cream.

I wish political debates would have thier mic cut like this.

Thanks Doctor Duffy, amusing and informative. Thanks and keep up the good work.

Surprising episode for sure. Loved the debate.

@Bassotronics

2 жыл бұрын

@@doctormanganate5814 Yes. But I still love the fact that this particular episode was in form of a debate regardless if it was scripted or not.

Very interesting video and I love the crawler, even if I did have to watch the video twice. Thank you.

Total home run!! Very entertaining and also very enlightening! Thanks, y’all!!!

"Science KZread's third most popular particle physics debate show on tuesdays ..." I love it ...

Wonderful! Had to watch it two times, because the first time, I got 100% distracted by the news banner :-) Some of these lines are pure comedy gold!

A very definite thank you to the creators and for the promise of more next week. This may be the best route into the “dark”!

Wow, it got pretty crazy there for a second! So glad the host kept them both on a short leash!!!

Excellent work. I had to watch it again to read the news ticker!

Very fun (and informative) presentation!

Really great way to present these ideas 👍👍

Where did the heavy neutrino go? This really should have been a three way debate. And I’m already looking forward to the dirac vs. majorana debate

News ticker at 4:40: Study concludes people tune news tickers out after about two minutes. Study is wrong.

I had to watch this several times, pausing and rewinding each time, because the speakers kept distracting me from the ticker and the ticker kept distracting me from the speakers. Keep up the awesome work Team Fermilab!

@harriehausenman8623

2 жыл бұрын

Same here. The ticker is pure comedy gold!

Neutrinos have flavours??? I hope they are Chocolate, Double Chocolate and Triple Chocolate!

I predict this video will get twice as many views as the average Even Bananas video, since it's impossible to watch the presentation *and* follow the ticker at the same time. 😁

@KenMathis1

2 жыл бұрын

I currently exist in the superposition state of having watched the video and read the ticker.

Best. Ticker. Ever.

"strong force now able to bench about 280, 285" - hilarious 😂

I had to watch this twice!! Once to listen and once to read the crawler!! Great video!!!

LOL... That was both hilarious and informative. Thanks!

That news ticker got me lol on multiple occasions.

That 'news ticker' was a nice touch. 👍

Fantastic video. Entertaining and informative.

Thanks for that glimpse into the world of neutrino conundrums, Kirsty.

Just watched Sterile neutrinos and seesaws from may 2017 (Fermilab) where the demise of the seesaw was memorized. There is still is a good sense of humor and science in some places.

I had to watch twice, once for the content, and once to read the news ticker uninterrupted.

love this debate format, showing just how scientific progress is not linear and disagreements are completely normal

I had to watch again for the beautiful subtitles, mute this time. Please! There are elder people to try to learn something with fun. We don't have that attention span!

Very interesting but it is hard .to concentrate on the discussion while trying to read the news banner at the bottom. As good as the discussion but with much more laughs out of it. Waiting for the next edition of BNN.

Protip: turn off sound and use 2x speed to read the ticker. That damn thing was way too fun and made it impossible to focus. Had to get it out of the way first.

I really enjoyed this!

wonderful! i'd like it if the mute option was used more often in news debates like this. lower 1/3 was awesome!

If sterile neutrinos only interact with gravity cant we use some sort of gravitacional lense phenomena (for example a point of convergence behind the moon) to calculate some discrepancy? Or would this point have a teorical Equal ratio of sterile/others neutrinos than any point in space?

chicago: don't put your laptop/camera on your bed, as it makes you jump up and down all shaky in your pic/cam.

I am just so emotionally burned out on the adversarial format of "controversial issue" news debates that I had a hard time being able to enjoy this for very long and had to tune out. x.x

When neutrinos are emitted during fusion or decay, do neutrinos mark the one way nature of particle science? Like I have seen in other videos where it is hypothesized you can't unscramble an egg.

Breaking new ground in the field of physics based humor (and humour)!

I had to watch this video twice: Once for the argument and then again for the lower third. A writer at Fermilab must have had a nice bit of extra time.

In a debate, even better than a moderator muting an interrupter would be to unmute only one debater at a time, so no one can be interrupted. To accomplish that and to ensure each participant is given equal time, I suggest using a device analogous to a chess clock. (A chess clock actually has two clocks... a separate countdown timer for each of the two participants.) While a participant is speaking, her timer is running and her opponent is muted. When she finishes speaking, she presses a button that stops her timer, mutes herself, starts her opponent's timer, and unmutes her opponent. If her timer reaches zero, she remains muted for the rest of the debate.

Absolutely hilarious ticker! Brilliant video!

Is it just me, or does the intro make this feel like this is the most serious video ever recorded?

the scroll is a laugh a minute eyerollers galore. approved by physics grads everywhere👍

What a coincidence! Earlier today, Nick Lucid-who runs the _Science Asylum_ channel on KZread-was also rooting for sterile neutrinos. He's hoping they constitute dark matter.

@sambhavjain5544

2 жыл бұрын

Ohh goodness, I was just going for my sleep, and then read this thought of yours. I won't be able to sleep now. 🙄

@promethium-145

2 жыл бұрын

I don't think Sterile Neutrinos could constitute enough rest energy for Dark Matter. I wish the Neutrinos were more interactive, or massive. Do we even know their masses yet?!

Has this been tried: set up neutrino detectors that can specify a particular patch of sky. Use several “normal” patches as a control, measuring the neutrino oscillation. Then test areas where cosmic neutrino sources pass through large/relatively dense patches of dark matter. Is there a significant change in oscillation values?

@BrokeLikeMcHammer

2 жыл бұрын

I don't think they can "aim" a neutrino detector like it was a telescope.

I can't wait to see Hamiltonian

From the news ticker: _"NEUTRINO BITES DOG"_ I bet the dog NEVER felt a thing...😉

Ok, I am confused. As best I understand the right and left hand spin neutrinos are very different. One set responds to the weak force and the other set doesn't. So why aren't the non-weak force neutrinos the sterile ones? In this world there are three sterile neutrinos not one and everything fits into the standard model, but we don't yet understand what bumps the left-right spin change. Please help me be smarter. Thank you. I love your channel.

This debate was very interesting .I wasn't expecting that it would be that good. Both ideas where pretty convincing ,I found Mark Chair"s idea little more convincing. 👍

🤣Awesome debate, guys! THANK YOU!!!❤🎉✔️

If there were 4 types of neutrinos, wouldn't tests show 75% fewer than expected instead of 66% fewer? I don't quite get how this idea makes any sense. But then again, oscillation seems to make zero sense too.

Is the rough number of neutrinos in the observable universe known to within an order of magnitude?

Good look Kirstin. Final line sums it up ;-)

We want new neutrinos!!

you look like you had a lot of fun making this one

There are two versions of each fermion (left and right handed chirality) in addition to the matter/anti matter versions of each particle - four in total. My understanding is that the sterile neutrino is simply the right handed for the matter and left handed for the antimatter version of each electron flavour observed. How is then a unique fourth one breaking the symmetry of three in the standard model?

The ticker was great!

4 minutes in "New study finds people ignore ticker tape news after 2 minutes". Who else was struggling to read and listen???

Fermilab Scientists successfully split the Banana. Nice

Another particle would be significant. People like me primed to wait and see.

Elena talked about there not being room for a fourth neutrino, but is there anything to stop there from being three generations of sterile neutrinos?

This satirical format is too confusing for me. Could you post a more traditional explanation video?

We already know sterile neutrinos exist. Ghost detects them whenever the Taken shows up... 😂

I hope everyone checks their guns at the door!

Maybe there are 3 yet undiscovered neutrino fields...that way everyone is right.

Is there any reason for supersymmetry or does scientist just like it because it's " nice "?

Would a sterile neutrino have to be a fourth neutrino, or could it be a regular neutrino that has entered a non-interacting state (like for instance, being turned around backwards)? And if a sterile neutrino is a fourth neutrino, to count as sterile, does it need to be totally non-interacting (except by gravity), or could it be paired up with a lepton that is so massive (but otherwise completely conventional) that our particle accelerators just haven't been able to make one yet?

Is there a difference between the 3 right-handed neutrinos and this fourth sterile neutrino? I am confused... A also hope this new flavor is not pistachio

Brilliant!

String Theory was not a waste of time. Geometry is the key to Math and Physics. What if we describe subatomic particles as spatial curvature, instead of trying to describe General Relativity as being mediated by particles? Quantum Entangled Twisted Tubules: "A theory that you can't explain to a bartender is probably no damn good." Ernest Rutherford The following is meant to be a generalized framework for an extension of Kaluza-Klein Theory. Does it agree with the “Twistor Theory” of Roger Penrose? During the early history of mankind, the twisting of fibers was used to produce thread, and this thread was used to produce fabrics. The twist of the thread is locked up within these fabrics. Is matter made up of twisted 3D-4D structures which store spatial curvature that we describe as “particles"? Are the twist cycles the "quanta" of Quantum Mechanics? When we draw a sine wave on a blackboard, we are representing spatial curvature. Does a photon transfer spatial curvature from one location to another? Wrap a piece of wire around a pencil and it can produce a 3D coil of wire, much like a spring. When viewed from the side it can look like a two-dimensional sine wave. You could coil the wire with either a right-hand twist, or with a left-hand twist. Could Planck's Constant be proportional to the twist cycles. A photon with a higher frequency has more energy. ( E=hf, More spatial curvature as the frequency increases = more Energy ). What if gluons are actually made up of these twisted tubes which become entangled with other tubes to produce quarks. (In the same way twisted electrical extension cords can become entangled.) Therefore, the gluons are a part of the quarks. Quarks cannot exist without gluons, and vice-versa. Mesons are made up of two entangled tubes (Quarks/Gluons), while protons and neutrons would be made up of three entangled tubes. (Quarks/Gluons) The "Color Force" would be related to the XYZ coordinates (orientation) of entanglement. "Asymptotic Freedom", and "flux tubes" are logically based on this concept. The Dirac “belt trick” also reveals the concept of twist in the ½ spin of subatomic particles. If each twist cycle is proportional to h, we have identified the source of Quantum Mechanics as a consequence twist cycle geometry. Modern physicists say the Strong Force is mediated by a constant exchange of Mesons. The diagrams produced by some modern physicists actually represent the Strong Force like a spring connecting the two quarks. Asymptotic Freedom acts like real springs. Their drawing is actually more correct than their theory and matches perfectly to what I am saying in this model. You cannot separate the Gluons from the Quarks because they are a part of the same thing. The Quarks are the places where the Gluons are entangled with each other. Neutrinos would be made up of a twisted torus (like a twisted donut) within this model. The twist in the torus can either be Right-Hand or Left-Hand. Some twisted donuts can be larger than others, which can produce three different types of neutrinos. Gravity is a result of a very small curvature imbalance within atoms. (This is why the force of gravity is so small.) Instead of attempting to explain matter as "particles", this concept attempts to explain matter more in the manner of our current understanding of the space-time curvature of gravity. If an electron has qualities of both a particle and a wave, it cannot be either one. It must be something else. Therefore, a "particle" is actually a structure which stores spatial curvature. Can an electron-positron pair (which are made up of opposite directions of twist) annihilate each other by unwinding into each other producing Gamma Ray photons? Does an electron travel through space like a threaded nut traveling down a threaded rod, with each twist cycle proportional to Planck’s Constant? Does it wind up on one end, while unwinding on the other end? Is this related to the Higgs field? Does this help explain the strange ½ spin of many subatomic particles? Does the 720 degree rotation of a 1/2 spin particle require at least one extra dimension? Alpha decay occurs when the two protons and two neutrons (which are bound together by entangled tubes), become un-entangled from the rest of the nucleons . Beta decay occurs when the tube of a down quark/gluon in a neutron becomes overtwisted and breaks producing a twisted torus (neutrino) and an up quark, and the ejected electron. The phenomenon of Supercoiling involving twist and writhe cycles may reveal how overtwisted quarks can produce these new particles. The conversion of twists into writhes, and vice-versa, is an interesting process. Gamma photons are produced when a tube unwinds producing electromagnetic waves. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Within this model a black hole could represent a quantum of gravity, because it is one cycle of spatial gravitational curvature. Therefore, instead of a graviton being a subatomic particle it could be considered to be a black hole. The overall gravitational attraction would be caused by a very tiny curvature imbalance within atoms. We know there is an unequal distribution of electrical charge within each atom because the positive charge is concentrated within the nucleus, even though the overall electrical charge of the atom is balanced by equal positive and negative charge. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In this model Alpha equals the compactification ratio within the twistor cone, which is approximately 1/137. 1= Hypertubule diameter at 4D interface 137= Cone’s larger end diameter at 3D interface where the photons are absorbed or emitted. The 4D twisted Hypertubule gets longer or shorter as twisting or untwisting occurs. (720 degrees per twist cycle.) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How many neutrinos are left over from the Big Bang? They have a small mass, but they could be very large in number. Could this help explain Dark Matter? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why did Paul Dirac use the twist in a belt to help explain particle spin? Is Dirac’s belt trick related to this model? Is the “Quantum” unit based on twist cycles? ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ I started out imagining a subatomic Einstein-Rosen Bridge whose internal surface is twisted with either a Right-Hand twist, or a Left-Hand twist. The model grew out of that simple idea. I was also trying to imagine a way to stuff the curvature of a 3 D sine wave into subatomic particles. .

"Yes, we have no bananas" ... Runs for cover.

I'm watching this at least twice for the main talk and for the news scroll 🤭🤣

I paid more attention to the news crawler than the debate, the crawler had some hilarious stuff on it

hard to focus on the arguments when all my attention was devoted to the ticker at the bottom!=)

Nice. Must have taken a lot of work.

Thought that underground money pit in Switzerland, was supposed to find all this out, yet so far it's only found a particle we already pretty much knew existed. What a waste of money

If sterile neutrinos don't interact with anything how are they possibly being detected in these experiments?

Sterile Neutrino sounds exactly like dark matter. Lol!

"fat electron" LOL