Apparently the car was seen leaving the JFK assassination too.

@hardworkmcgee2998

6 ай бұрын

🤣

@gee7084

6 ай бұрын

Glad he didn’t get hook up like Harvey we all know how that ended.

Its an illegal stop because he was already parked in his driveway.

@joedennehy386

6 ай бұрын

It wouldn't have been if he had attempted to stop him on the road, which he didn't appear to do

@owenprince4823

6 ай бұрын

In Canada the government owns your drive way so the cops give tickets to people sitting in their car in the driveway with no seatbelt on. Communism is hell so do everything you can to keep it out of the USA.

@Sievers808

6 ай бұрын

You're entirely wrong. Try again

@kevinzink9063

6 ай бұрын

Do you seriously think that pulling into your driveway just absolves you of all crimes you committed before that? LOL.

@patriot101101

6 ай бұрын

He did not just pull into his driveway he was parked for over 10 mins before that cop came onto there property.@@kevinzink9063

When the cop said "resonable suspicion of donuts" I died!!!

@hpprochargedtbss

6 ай бұрын

The tyrant ticketed him for it too.

@gregoryfrickey1715

6 ай бұрын

BUY THE DANG COP SOME DOUGHNUTS

@leeoshea2290

6 ай бұрын

cause he couldn't eat those doughnuts what a scoundrel, making shite up and 'maybe' you have warrants wow, Americans, they got you good now, 'failure to obey a lawful order', that's going to be the no.1 jailable offense, refusing to be told what to do You are all, no longer free.

@thomasspringer5187

6 ай бұрын

No such thing as "reasonable suspicion" at law. The law requires probable cause. Probable cause requires articulated evidence . Why are you people not demanding their enforcers of crime to adhere to the law?

Notice how much that cop is stammering when he talks, which tells me he pulling these So-called "Charges" out of midair. 🤦🏿‍♂️

@therealnews

6 ай бұрын

That is a fair point. Normally, I watch encounters where the officer is aggressive physically and verbally but this stood out to me, because even though the officer was polite... it could be considered a "fishing expedition." As Andrew's friend off screen said, "isn't there any real crime going on?"- Thanks again-taya

@claudefields5941

6 ай бұрын

That's Strange ...I just knew..if the Question was Asked as to the Origin of those Charges someone was Going to ask, the OSSIFER did he Pluck Charges from the MOON or "UR-ANUS"???

@CrazyBear65

6 ай бұрын

Pulling them out of his Heineken. I've had cops do the same to me years ago, and I didn't know there was a way to fight back. Of course, we didn't all have phones with cameras in them back then either. I wouldn't have had proof. And even though judges are _supposed_ to be impartial, we all know that the judges and the cops and the ADAs all get paid by the same corrupt system. To say they're in cahoots would be an understatement.

@markfrank5937

6 ай бұрын

He just wants to run his name. This is a 4th amendment issue. Smh....

How tf was he charged with "reckless" driving when all he had was a phone call from an unknown source that said he "may" have been doing donuts?

@andreroy8141

6 ай бұрын

The cop is trying to cover his ass for clearly violating the young man's rights. There were witnesses to the officer's harrassment. They were hoping to catch him dirty somehow. All of it will be thrown out in court, because it's no way that charge would stand without the Cop actually seeing it. He knows that the Department would be sued without charges and still could be if they don't hold up in court. Classic case of driving while Black!

@johnsomich7890

6 ай бұрын

“We got a call” is so abused it’s ridiculous… if there even was one.

@hpprochargedtbss

6 ай бұрын

@@andreroy8141if it was me I’d absolutely sue because he put me through this. If he’d of just let me go I’d just make a complaint about him violating my rights.

@kevinzink9063

6 ай бұрын

If an eyewitness comes forward, they can certainly be used in a court as evidence.

@ephanhymerable

6 ай бұрын

@@kevinzink9063 all he had was "we had a call that you may have been doing donuts." If they tracked the "eye witness" down & they testified in court its still a he said she said case. That's weak @ best

Retired police officer told me as soon as the lights go on they start fishing he told me to keep your conversation with the police officer to the limit

@thomasspringer5187

6 ай бұрын

As soon as the lights come on your under arrest. It's called a custodial arrest and the arresting officer is required to marandise the arrested. Then just invoke your right to remain silent until your attorney or counsel is present. This is the questions everyone should ask , then envkoke the right , then shut up !!!

@user-lf8el3nr5i

4 ай бұрын

What conversation? Lol

Been there and done that. A cop followed me 2 miles, all the way to my house, a quarter of a mile off the highway. I was out of my truck and unlocking my front door when he pulled up in my driveway and initiated his strobes. First he said I was speeding, then it was failure to maintain one lane of traffic, he ended with a no seat belt ticket. I'm believing he was simply bored and I was available entertainment.

@evangelicalsnever-lie9792

6 ай бұрын

And you paid it? Didn't take him.to court?

@frazergeno4557

6 ай бұрын

​@evangelicalsnever-lie9792 Got charged for speeding years ago when I wasn't speeding. The judge in Dryden Ontario Canada didn't care that the cop was lying, When a cop lies in court, we know that our justice system is no longer there for the people.

@evangelicalsnever-lie9792

6 ай бұрын

@@frazergeno4557 1). Don't talk to me. This question is not addressed to you. I have zero interest in what you have to say on the matter, capish? 2). Not even close. This involves entering private property and other issues. The situations are vastly different and far more potential law and constitutional violations regarding the OP's story. I hate people like you that think their situation matches a completely different one, and then think you're making a point with me. You're not. Dismissed.

Reckless driving is a very serious charge. The officer didn't see the car doing donuts. How can the driver be charged without evidence?

@Based_Dept.

6 ай бұрын

The united states of embarrassment

@kevinzink9063

6 ай бұрын

How do you know there isn't video or an eyewitness. The cop doesn't have to present evidence at the time of arrest. But in court.

@abitupthehudson

6 ай бұрын

@@kevinzink9063 Now, you are talking with reason. Thank you.

@abitupthehudson

6 ай бұрын

I didn't arrive to the point of my brother actually being charged. Did you?

@gordonschedel368

6 ай бұрын

I think it’s just harassment of the driver. The cop didn’t like the looks of them. Maybe he was jealous of the car who knows

End Qualified Immunity. Overturn Terry v Ohio . lawyer up and sue.

We the people need to hold the judges accountable for allowing cops to violate the people.

@CrazyBear65

6 ай бұрын

We need to hold the _whole damned corrupt system_ accountable! All three branches.

@walkingdeadman4208

6 ай бұрын

Thats why they have given themselves absolute immunity, so we cant

@Somberdemure

6 ай бұрын

Same old blah blah. Bring down the state and never replace it.

@daaveedseth5427

6 ай бұрын

Police bring judges profit, that why they get away with crimes..

@robbiemorrow3473

6 ай бұрын

​@@Somberdemure If the state was brought down & not replaced with working laws, it would be like the series of (Deadwood), There would be no accountability for Anything, Well, DAMM, when I spelled it out loud, it seems that way now. Hay, TY4SHARING, & have a safe & Blessed Holiday season!🙏🏼🎩

A straight up fishing expedition, they went from one charge to another trying to see what would stick

If the cop had the slightest bit of intelligence he would've called in the license plate to make sure he got the right person. 🤦🏿‍♂️

@therealnews

6 ай бұрын

You absolutely read my mind! I turned to stephen and said, "If I was the officer, I would have left the other cop by Andrew's car, ran the plates, ran the address and then returned to the gentlemen." there were so many other ways to approach this. I almost, almost felt bad. I feel like if training was a little better, this might have been a better encounter. -taya

@entobie

6 ай бұрын

Intelligence ? He's a Cop.

@patriot101101

6 ай бұрын

That's why its good to have a dash camera, you can make the cop look real stupid in court.

@ianking8315

6 ай бұрын

he was fishing thats all.

@petermastenbroek7719

6 ай бұрын

There you say it :"If the cop had the slightest bit of intelligence", if that would have been his case, he would not have been a cop.

As soon as the cop said " just let me run your name and see if you have any warrants " tells it all . Too many officers think a call or suspicion is enough to make the detain and demand for ID so they can run their subject for warrants and it makes for an easy arrest and keeps them looking like they are properly policing when they are acting with no RAS or PC and are showing no restraint for constutional rights ! It leads to unresonable searches and any decent lawyer will have all charges dropped and any other charges are fruit of the poisonous tree ! Also in most police departments it is in department policy for an officer to dispatch a superior officer upon request by a subject in most departments !

@John-ue9pt

6 ай бұрын

No don’t run my name then you’re in a data base and then your on a watch list

@CartoClips

6 ай бұрын

I’ve literally had this happen to me in my 20s for an unpaid ticket and I spent the night in jail and then I never didn’t pay a ticket immediately when I got one and I was also very careful about not getting tickets after that what if the warrant was for like a DY or vehicular manslaughter, look at the stats driving is very dangerous. It Hass to be taken seriously if you got a problem with cops and don’t get in your car walk to the store.

@brianhairston

6 ай бұрын

​@@CartoClips WEIRD@

@ronaldsummerlin9772

6 ай бұрын

​@@CartoClipsno victim no crime

@CartoClips

6 ай бұрын

@@ronaldsummerlin9772 I just remembered that I was driving back to Austin, Texas on I 10 coming over the bridge in Baton Rouge and some truck had had a small ladder fall off it that was sitting perpendicular in the middle of the road and I just barely missed it, and that thing would’ve surely given my little car a flator even maybe punctured the oil pan cars are extremely serious it’s what kills most people after natural causes and exhaust keep cancer, causing chemicals like low level ozone from being in the air that stuff can give kids asthma and stuff so if you’re driving a bucket and it ain’t safe that everybody else on the road is the victim

Unreasonable is the keyword. Unreasonable, searches, and seizures.

When does this become harassment? In the UK if you're wrongfully pulled over on three occasions without a valid reason that becomes harassment and is a criminal offence. A colleague was pulled over on three successive days on his commute to work and breathalysed. On speaking to his lawyer he was advised to state this is the fourth time you are attempting to breathalyse me, three times constitutes harassment. The officer backed down and there were no more stops. Harassment in the UK is a criminal offence and would put the officer out of a job.

Bellingham and Whatcom County have a history of all things authoritarian..... The Lummi Nation will not allow the Sheriff and City of Bellingham, in any capacity, on their land, due to years of abusive interaction. They must submit a request for approval prior to arrival and have legitimate reason to visit: business. It's insane up there.

@CrazyBear65

6 ай бұрын

That's good to know. I'll make sure never to go to Bellingham and Whatcom, if I'm ever out west again. It's also good to know that Indigenous Sovereignty is taken seriously. Big Brother has a history of not honoring treaties.

@brad3706

6 ай бұрын

@@CrazyBear65 Yeah, the 28 Washington Tribes, like many nations, have quite a history. I'm not native. I worked several projects and heard many stories of their past and present fights. Most tribes have opened cultural/historical centers and many have opened casinos as well as other commercial ventures: Puyallup, Squamish, Lummi, Tulalip, Yakima and Kalispell, are the big guns of self-sufficient nations. It's worth your time to pay them a visit.

If a person is not arrested can they still sue for an abuse of civil rights?

@hypatiaalexandria1164

6 ай бұрын

Yes

@tybeejeffro

6 ай бұрын

Absolutely. They can definitely violate your rights without arresting you.

@gloriajohnson3865

6 ай бұрын

Yes that part 🤣

Whenever the COPS asks for your name; it is at that point, "Law Abiding Citizen."

@GregBurch

6 ай бұрын

"Redacted. Now fuck off."

When you ask for a supervisor, you need to keep in mind all you want is to show corruption, and record. Record all cops all the time

When they say they are trying not to take ypu to jail, and they are trying tohellp you..... They are lying.

Whether or not they have to call a supervisor, it sure seems suspicious to me when they refuse it. If they don't have anything to hide and their behavior is on the up and up, why is there a problem with calling a supervisor? Always makes me think they're hiding something...

@therealnews

6 ай бұрын

Thank you so much for this comment! I think you make a very good point! Although there are scenarios that perhaps in a big urban area on a Saturday night a supervisor genuinely might not be available but in general, when it is refused immediately, a few alarm bells appear for me as well. Thanks for watching! -taya

@petermastenbroek7719

6 ай бұрын

Of course they are hiding EVERYTHING, which is completely normal for these uniformed criminals.

@wilfridcyr

6 ай бұрын

Cops don't become psychos, psychos become cops.

@jeffkroening5765

6 ай бұрын

You mean like when people refuse to identify . If they haven't done anything wrong or have nothing to hide then why not just ID.

@israel4reel787

6 ай бұрын

@@jeffkroening5765Because it’s against the law to ID if there is no crime.

There is an appalling lack of problem solving and logical thinking in law enforcement today. It would have been exceedingly simple to run the plate or otherwise make confirmations.

@wildkeezy50--2

6 ай бұрын

He for sure ran the plates.Im tell these cops will see a black person and for the smallestEXPRESSION They'll be like how dare he rev his engine,roll their eyes,get smart,talk back ECT,ect,ECT our skin is weponized. 12:49

@edwardd.taormina1509

6 ай бұрын

Running the plate wouldn't pull up wants and warrants on the driver if it isn't registered in his name.

@marw1920

6 ай бұрын

Its not lack of training - they are order followers - following systemic policy of a emerging police state. "Show me your papers" was once reasonable ground until the duplicity was revealed in a final solution. In fact, "We lock up a higher percentage of our people than any other nation on earth." [Madar, professor of law at NYU.]

These police are just fishing for something to use against him!

@jdoublej8619

6 ай бұрын

Yes. The police have always hunted Black Men. Now we get it on video.

@josephatherley86

6 ай бұрын

It always happens to blacks.

One reason why we are seeing so many of these insane arrests is bc the current Attorney General, Merritt Garland... has created dozens of police grants which stipulate that in order for the police to receive the allotted cash... they must make a specific number of arrests every week, (drunk driving grant is for the number of DUI arrests, Traffic grants are for the # of traffic arrests, etc). There are literally dozens of these and one of the highest paying grants is the 'anti-police grant... which is why we are seeing so many obstruction and resisting arrests but literally every type of arrest is now financially rewarded by the DOJ. It does not matter if the charges are dropped, even w/in hours... as long as the arrest was made. They must be gathering a data base to see which citizens do not simply obey... who knows. But this is why these cops are so insane now, they have huge financial incentives to arrest people.

@nancygibson5769

6 ай бұрын

There will be no justice as long as we allow the corruption in the justice department.

My mom got a call that I, her son was doing donuts in the community park gravel area. I was sitting next to her the whole afternoon. Pissed her off and she jumped her car went to park and donuts . They called about me and I said how can I be there and answer the phone here. HA ha ha

@therealnews

6 ай бұрын

Wow! That is wild! And you mom sounds awesome by the way! -taya

@CrazyBear65

6 ай бұрын

And what's wrong with doing donuts anyway? Or burnouts? We used to do burnouts and donuts all the time. Do it on private property, they can't say you're on a public street. I turfed the hell out of the high school field one time, nineteen eighty _something._ Long enough ago that any statute of limitations is long run out by now.

What the heavens?? I've stopped an intersections and stayed next to a car that had blasting music and a loud exhaust pipe, and was never pulled over by a cop even when a cop is near by.

This guy would have benenfited from Attorney Shield. He knows something isn't right but needs legal assistance. Most police departments have asking for a supervisor as their policy.

I think most departments have a policy that when a citizen requests a supervisor that they have to provide one on scene. I think we should ALL make it our policy to record police and request a Supervisor for each interaction so that if they violate your rights it will show a practice of abuse and a culture supporting that abuse when a supervisor is present. This combined with video footage will help you in court.

@anthonymaughan6103

6 ай бұрын

Maybe that's why they don't allow it bra ??

@Sievers808

6 ай бұрын

Yea, because obviously it's REASONABLE to have a supervisor drive out to every tweaker getting arrested on every street corner. And while they wait for the supervisors to show up to baby the criminals, other criminals are out doing more crimes. Good call. Really makes sense. 👍 Stop being a baby.

@ianhill4585

6 ай бұрын

True, they won't call out a supervisor if the cop is fishing and the supervisor would side against the cop.

IF you are LEGALLY STOPPED... Say the ENTIRE LAW.

Hold that d.mn Public Servant accountable. He has no business working with the public.

I’m from Alabama, and it always gets me. Where do all of these cops come from because here in Alabama you never see a cop.

Road pirates, All COPs are glorified TAX pirates of the government. It is Not JUST the apples that are rotten, it is the barrel, structure, or culture that has gone bad! Some COPs are using a Ouija board to figure out what charges to file. 🤪 “Never argue with an idiot, they will beat you with experience, and drag you down to their level!” - Mark Twain

@MeMe-bg8ci

6 ай бұрын

Road privateers. Pirates don’t work for the State, privateers do.

@mule1995

6 ай бұрын

@@MeMe-bg8ci I agree but privateers usually keep the money they extort. This is just taxation in another form. “If taxation without consent or monitoring is not robbery, then any band of robbers have only to declare themselves a government, and all their robberies are legalized.” - Lysander Spooner “A man’s natural rights are his own, against the whole world; and any infringement of them is equally a crime … whether committed by one man, calling himself a robber … or by millions, calling themselves a government.” - Lysander Spooner

@josephatherley86

6 ай бұрын

So True.

Law enforcement is the only field where the bosses are afraid of the employees; governors, state legislators, mayors, county officials, city officials. No one stands up to them nor their reps. Cowardly

You don't have to give your ID unless you are suspected of committing a crime. No state in the U.S. requires having to provide an ID.

@frankvandalen6524

6 ай бұрын

And then there's Montana! 46-5-401 mca. Look it up

@charliechristie2949

6 ай бұрын

If you commit a traffic infraction, you must provide ID. It is a crime to refuse.

@lonniewhaley6505

6 ай бұрын

​@@charliechristie2949"someone made a call" isn't a crime. It's borderline even reason to suspect a crime. And other than video or sworn affidavit there is ZERO evidence that anything was ever done. Doing donuts and only one person "might" have seen it? That story has more holes than the donuts those guys love so much.

@Sievers808

6 ай бұрын

False. Entirely false. Stop spreading misinformation. If you want to be a youtube lawyer then go to law school and actually learn something instead of just lying to people.

@kevinzink9063

6 ай бұрын

@@lonniewhaley6505 how do you know they don't have video or an eyewitness? You don't. The cop doesn't have to produce the evidence on the side of the road.

Just call the Local News Stations. They love "live conflict for ratings, and the cops HATE the exposure😂!

Even though it may not be law, did you check Department policy when someone asks for a supervisor?

We are NOT granted rights. We are imbued with them at birth. They were not given to us by authority, nor man and so cannot be denied nor have them seized by either or. They are inalienable, attained by each individual from the first breath, the first beat of heart and are part of our being until the heart stops and we exhale our last lung full of air. Stand upon your RIGHTS, as they are as much a part of your being as the legs beneath you

@evangelicalsnever-lie9792

6 ай бұрын

Your rights are _not_ absolute. They are controllable, can be modified, and are even revokable up to and including ones life, depending on the circumstances If you doubt me, feel free to test the hypothesis. And you cannot claim they come from a "creator" until we can cross examine whatever Magical Invisible Friend any religious zealot claims they have... Until the claimant can credibly prove any version or a presuppositional, so-called "god," wha ate free to dismiss out of hand, all so-called "god' claims, presented without credible evidence.

On your property is on your property, kudos to the demeanor the young man had i couldn't of done that.

@kevinzink9063

6 ай бұрын

Unless he committed the infraction off his property...then it doesn't matter if he is stopped on his property

@CowToes

6 ай бұрын

No infraction observed, illegal stop.

One day real soon i’ll have to share my story with you to air and to bring attention to the matter and maybe some much-needed action and change and exposure and transparency and accountability. It involves the fair housing act, the Americans, with disabilities act, the civil rights act, the rehabilitation act, and comparable state and county statutes. Blind Justice is aware of my situation firsthand.

@MicheleHow777

6 ай бұрын

Please do. There are so many channels like this that would gladly share your story & help. My daughter was born disable & it has been a tough road. May you seek the True Justice you deserve. God Bless.

@DISABILITY-ADVOCATE-ASK4HELP

6 ай бұрын

@@MicheleHow777

@DISABILITY-ADVOCATE-ASK4HELP

6 ай бұрын

@@MicheleHow777 I would be glad to chat with ANYONE if you’d like re: definition of DISABLED, discrimination and noncompliance with the Civil Rights Act and the parallel Statutes. Sadly a majority of AmeriCANs don’t know their human (civil) rights. Even less know that there are other special separate protections and rights GRANTED under the Fair Housing, Americans With Disabilities, Rehabilitation, and Civil Rights Acts. The definition of disabled is VERY BROAD and to be interpreted to the GREATEST EXTENT POSSIBLE TO MAXIMIZE COVERAGE consequently there are MANY people that likely are DISABLED under the Acts and have protections afforded to them. It is imperative to understand this and to share this with as many people as we can. Persons with disabilities not only share the same civil rights as everyone else, they/we are also entitled to PREFERENTIAL treatment to ADJUST for or accommodate the (the practical) limitations and/or disabilities. This is known as an accommodation, modification and/or exemption. Anyone may request an accommodation for someone else, including an agency, like Disability Rights Florida etc. There are also several private housing agencies that investigated allegations of housing discrimination. They use TESTERS. That’s kind of what we all are as “auditors”. Another important item is that ANYONE can report of file a grievance with a government entity and/or the appropriate Federal Agency; the DOJ, the EEOC, and/or HUD. You can also report issues to various State Commissions like the Florida Commission on Human Relations or private housing agencies. You don’t have to be disabled to do so. The grievance can be for one of two things: 1) noncompliance; and/or discrimination. The former is for noncompliance with Federal, State or local anti discrimination laws, the latter for discrimination against you or someone you know. Another very important fact that most people let alone government agencies don’t know, and frankly loathe, is the concept of associative discrimination. If you, I, or someone associates with or has a relationship with someone with a disability, BOTH groups of people are protected under the Acts. REREAD THAT EVERYONE!! It’s important to note that there are many “types” of disabilities and NOT just physical disabilities. Invisible or mental disabilities are OFTEN overlooked including in court settings. Court personnel including jury services, clerk staff and court staff including JUDGES rarely know the laws. Invisible disabilities must be accommodated in PARITY with physical disabilities and MUST be done privately. The Acts even REQUIRE private corporations and public entities to VIOLATE STATE STATUTES TO COMPORT WITH FEDERAL STATUTES; the FHA, ADA, RA & the CRA. READ THAT AGAIN!! They CANNOT use (the existence of and/or compliance with) state statutes as a valid justification for noncompliance with Federal Statutes. So, if a state statute of local policy, for example, states that any request for accommodation must be requested 48 hours in advance, such policy is subject to modification or accommodation. The state statute is limitations is also subject to modification under the Acts!! YES YOU READ THAT RIGHT!!! If there are multiple people that reside in a household, for example, the public entity MUST accommodate the needs of the person with disabilities REGARDLESS of the presence of others in the household. The entity CANNOT rely on and/or expect others to HELP the person with disabilities. Every person with disabilities has a right to ready, full, equal, independent, and dignified access to all public services, activities and/or programs. Every person with disabilities has a right to EFFECTIVE communication. In order for communication to be effective, it must be timely, in an accessible format, and in such a way as to protect the privacy, independence, and dignity of the person/s with disabilities. (3) cases that elucidate this theory are: 1) Tom is incarcerated. His partner is not. Tom wishes to communicate with his partner via telephone in the jail. Tom asks for “accommodation” to speak to his partner who is hearing impaired. The jail denies his request stating that Tom is not disabled and thus does NOT qualify for accommodation and/or protections under the Act. WRONG! The jail must accommodate Tom due to his association with a person with disabilities! BOTH Tom and his partner are protected by the Acts and have standing to sue under the same. 2) Tina has a court hearing. Tina’s daughter chooses to attend the PUBLIC hearing. (As a separate matter, everyone has a right to attend a public hearing and/or event and the public entity MUST ACCOMMODATE everyone in attendance even if not an active participant and/or party.) Tina is hearing impaired. Tina AND/OR her daughter may request accommodation in the form of a QUALIFIED sign language interpreter if that’s the persons’ PREFERRED method of communication. They may make such request verbally to anyone associated with the court and at anytime. The request must be handled CONFIDENTIALLY. Such act is considered administrative in nature and/or function and NOT JUDICIAL, if handled by a judge and/or magistrate. BOTH Tina and her daughter are protected and have standing under the same Acts. Tina relies on her daughter for her daughter support, interpretation, and guidance. Tina’s daughter has a right to attend and to communicate receptively, in this instance, at a PUBLIC hearing. Her mother happens to be a party in this case, which is irrelevant, but which gives her mother standing and protections under the Acts. 3) Jack and Jill are partners. Jill is disabled. Jack is NOT. Jill has a service animal. Jill is in a (mental health or medical) hospital for care. The hospital denies Jill’s service animals’ entry to the facility. Jack is forced to travel back and forth to the hospital with the service animal. Jack and Jill, again, BOTH are guaranteed the protections under the Acts and BOTH have standing to sue for discrimination and damages under the same. No special words and/or methods are required to request accommodation. An accommodation may be request AT ANY TIME. VERY IMPORTANT!! Even AFTER an event, action and/or inaction. I’ll answer any questions on this to shorten my response. Drop your email and I’d be happy to email you and from there I’d be happy to share my google number to chat more freely. The FHA, Fair Housing Act and the ADA, BOTH apply to housing ownership, rental, and/or boarding environments. The FHA applies to ALL municipal, county, state and Federal agencies. What that essentially means is that EVERY code, ordinance, rule, policy, procedure, pattern, practice, custom act and/or omission by a public entity - is SUBJECT TO THESE LAWS. The public entity MUST accommodate the person/s with disabilities and/or their associates, modify its’ policies, ordinances, etc., and must follow specific mandates when doing so and/or when refusing to do so. Lastly, for now lol, every time a public entity applies for and receives Federal funds, it CERTIFIES, under PENALTY OR PERJURY, through a written ASSURANCE to the Federal Govt, that the requesting entity is in FULL COMPLIANCE with ALL FEDERAL STATUTES AND THAT THE REQUESTING ENTITY WILL USE THE FUNDS IN FULL COMPLIANCE WITH ALL FEDERAL STATUTES. Failure to do so is a violation of the FALSE CLAIMS ACT. ANYONE can sue any public entity for violating the FCA. The rewards for a successful lawsuit are a percentage of what the Federal Govt lent to the public entity over the entire period of any violation/s. The amount is quite substantial! One may bring a private lawsuit and/or may report it to the Federal Government and be entitled to a percentage of what the Federal Government recovers from the Feds lawsuit against the Public entity; a whistleblower lawsuit/claim. Again, the rewards are staggeringly HIGH! I encourage EVERYONE to look into this and to report incidents of noncompliance, discrimination, and False Claims to the Department of Justice, to the Department of Housing and Urban Development and to local governments. To report incidences locally one may do so ANONYMOUSLY, unless accommodations are sought personally. Let’s all work to expose their abuse, lawlessness and corruption. I encourage and implore everyone to reach out to your local government and to ask for their ADA transition plan and emergency preparedness plan in standard print format, digital audio format, accessible electronic document format, and braille format. The entity is PROHIBITED from charging a SURCHARGE to produce the documents in alternate formats. FYI, discriminatory, sentiments and statements are also unlawful and actionable, and most importantly, indefensible. If the statements on their face or discriminatory, NO CONTEXT is required, however, if the statements are questionably discriminatory on their face, context MAY be required to substantiate the discriminatory nature. Intent is irrelevant! Please share your results and experience with me by sending your email so that I can share the responses and create a centralized database to compare and contrast compliance and violations across this great nation. See also: 18 USC 241, 42 USC 1983 and 1985. PUNITIVE DAMAGES ARE AVAILABLE UNDER THE FHA!!

@dianesmith-vaughn1495

6 ай бұрын

QUOTAS. THEY WORK FOR QUOTAS. SAD AND WRONG.😮

Andrew copped an attitude and “asked for a supervisor” and continued to argue and be difficult. He deserved the citations.

The thin spaghetti line gang

There's a good podcast series called "Running from COPS". It highlights how the show COPS have made police more interested in getting that arrest and putting on a good show for the cameras. The officers don't get put on TV unless the make an arrest and make it TV worthy.

When your expert claimed that our rights were given to us by the founding fathers, you are completely ignorant of the facts. Our rights are God given and the Bill of Rights was put in place to protect our rights. No one can give or take away those rights from a free people. However there is also the fact that the government at every level is incorporated, and that claiming citizenship puts you under those corporate statutes. So technically, you have no rights if you claim citizenship.

These policy enforcers are not officers because they hold no office. They're simply employees of a corporation.....

@kittyhawk7060

6 ай бұрын

The dictionary defines officers in several ways. One of them is employees of a corporation who are given authority.

@daaveedseth5427

6 ай бұрын

Who gave these cops the authority? Corporations do. That should be enough to make your eyebrow rise. Corporations usurp authority from people through deception. All corporations are all dead entities. Those who work for them are representative of a corp. Read the dead man statue. What all humans are experiencing is corporate take- over.

When asked for I think I will start asking for their jacket which should show whether or not they have a record for violating people's rights, use of force, ect but the public has to go out of their way to get that information

I live 20 min from Bellingham and in washington state theres so many cars that have a loud Muffler in fact I had my Cadillac converter stolen and I had to drive around for like 6 months or more so I believe that cop was intentionally doing this to him

@jamierupert7563

6 ай бұрын

😂😂😂😂😂 It's not a "Cadillac" converter…😂😂

Cops do exactly what they're hired to do. Protect and maķe revenue for their employers....

@k5blazernut485

6 ай бұрын

Take out the "protect" part & you'll be 100% right

The man should have just told the Cop to do what he had to do, forget all the bull about “doughnuts, tail lights, and speed. Just get his Neighbour to record all the evidence, just kept quiet.

These two claim you are obligated to show ID, yet they do not show any evidence that proves their claim.

A minor traffic violation? An exhaust pipe violation? So what. Is the earth any safer because the revenue collector is bored to tears.

Criminal with qualified immunity, lightening and thunder again.

He has no legal right to even following into his driveway he has no warrant.

@kevinzink9063

6 ай бұрын

He doesn't always need one. There are exceptions...and besides, anyone is free to walk up to your front door, unless you have no trespassing signs posted.

I was a security in nathawash minnesota for five years and every night my car got called in by the police sometimes three time.. I always got followed home with high beems on right behind me.. Got pulled over.. I was called in like 2000 times.. I am the most profiled native in american.. I complained and people got mad and the sheriff told the cops to leave me alone.. And i never got a diving ticket in my lifetime..none.. I quit that job because of how i was treated..

They use "1984" as their training manual.

Thank You for your help by holding Cops accountable!

Brothers tell your woman to always remain silent or shut up. She will only get you beat down while yelling at you to calm down.

YES THEY WANT TO SEARCH HIS CAR HOUSE ARSE AND STEAL ANY CASH THEY CAN FIND 4 STARTS

I did the donuts and I have cutouts on my exhaust. Confession implemented now probable cause is in question. Let my people go.

Here is the real problem. A citizen can be 100% right. But unless he has a lot of money and doesn't mind sitting in a cage for god knows how long. He has no choice but to comply. There are just about 0 attorneys out there who will take these cases. The police know this. What is the solution? Can anyone give me a good answer?

@jamierupert7563

6 ай бұрын

I keep asking the same thing.

@christopherthompson3041

6 ай бұрын

The Bible has THE answer. God's kingdom by Christ Jesus (Daniel 2:44, Psalms 37:10,11, Matthew 6:9,10).

The U.S. Supreme Court opened the door for police to stop, arrest and search citizens without reasonable suspicion or probable cause. [In a 5-3 ruling in Utah v. Strieff] Justice Sonia Sotomayor blasted the court for holding “that the discovery of a warrant for [as little as] an unpaid parking ticket will forgive a police officer’s violation of your Fourth Amendment rights.” Sotomayor further warned, “[t]his case allows the police to stop you on the street, demand your identification, and check it for outstanding traffic warrants-even if you are doing nothing wrong… So long as the target is one of the many millions of people in this country with an outstanding arrest warrant, anything the officer finds in a search is fair game for use in a criminal prosecution. The officer’s incentive to violate the Constitution thus increases: From here on, he sees potential advantage in stopping individuals without reasonable suspicion-exactly the temptation the exclusionary rule is supposed to remove.” Sotomayor wrote that the case "implies that you are not a citizen of a democracy but the subject of a carceral state, just waiting to be cataloged" and that unlawful stops "corrode all our civil liberties". Her dissent was called "ringing", citing "a canon for modern critiques of mass incarceration" in the prison for profit pipeline. Justice Elena Kagan also wrote a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Ginsburg joined in full. Kagan argued that the majority's ruling "creates unfortunate incentives for the police".[13] She explained: "So long as the target is one of the many millions of people in this country with an outstanding arrest warrant, anything the officer finds in a search is fair game for use in a criminal prosecution. The officer's incentive to violate the Constitution thus increases: From here on, he sees potential advantage in stopping individuals without reasonable suspicion-exactly the temptation the exclusionary rule is supposed to remove. Because the majority thus places Fourth Amendment protections at risk, I respectfully dissent." At issue 'prime factor' in *this case* is the uncertainty about “lawful orders” and civilians’ rights during police encounters - a pretextual 'fishing expedition' to ID for warrants. The police systemic controversy of 'unlawful orders' is what prompted legal scholar Orin Kerr to write his now famous opinion, "Sandra Bland and the 'lawful order' problem". He wrote, "Neither state laws nor federal regulations define the term “lawful order” even though it is a crime to disobey such a command. But what they do define is that the public should know the law. If an officer walks up to you and gives you an order, you’re “presumed” to immediately know every area of state and federal law. And on top of that, you’re presumed to know all the facts known to the officer that the officer won’t tell you. It begs the question, "isn’t a law punishing me for failure to obey an unlawful order unconstitutionally vague?" Too many cops attempt to exert dominance using the erroneous doctrine in 'color of law', a mere semblance of legal right; something done with the apparent authority of law but actually in contravention of law, where none exists. [Section 1983 lawsuits, 42 U.S.C. § 1983]. Unlawful demands are a common denominator to systemic misconduct by police that often escalates into unreasonable use of force incidents. At some point the courts will have to deal with the 'unlawful order problem' that's systemic in the institution of law enforcement. Retaliatory arrests ruin lives when police ego operates by the idiom, "You may beat the rap, but not the ride". Compliance to unlawful orders is no guarantee and often leads to spending the night in jail ruining innocent lives with malicious prosecution 'out of principle' of cops ego. In fact, "We lock up a higher percentage of our people than any other nation on earth." [Madar, professor of law at NYU.] In the 1960s, courts began to limit our right to resist an unlawful arrest, apparently influenced by Warner and by the Model Penal Code, which had eliminated the right on two grounds. First, there were better alternative means of resolving the issue i.e. - court. Second, resistance would likely result in greater injury to the citizen without preventing the arrest. Keep in mind this was before the U.S. Supreme Court created the qualified immunity doctrine out of thin air in Pierson v. Ray (1967), a case litigated during the height of the civil rights movement - severely limiting those legal grounds. SCOTUS made "alternative means of resolving" police misconduct through the court an even higher bar to achieve. Unfortunately, our legal system works only to correct wrongs after they have happened. There is no legal mechanism for prevention. The majority of present day court opinions follow this case law example: “simply stated, the law recognizes that liberty can be restored through legal processes but life or limb cannot be repaired in a courtroom. And so it holds that the reason for outlawing resistance to an unlawful arrest and requiring disputes to be resolved in the courts has no controlling application on the right to resist an officers' excessive force.” On the other hand, law also recognizes qualified immunity for police which exempts them from responsibility for poor decisions and misconduct. During recent argument in a similar case heard before the (NJ) Supreme Court the following exchange took place as reported in the press. The defense attorney was quoted as saying, "a person has a public duty to refuse to obey an illegal police order." Chief Justice Joseph Weintraub's answer was, "You'd have anarchy if you didn't have order." To this the defense attorney replied, "It's a police state otherwise."

@coponetwork

6 ай бұрын

"Show me your papers" was once reasonable ground until the duplicity was revealed in a final solution. In a free society we must be vigilant against this culture of authoritarian susceptibility. This is alarmingly reminiscent of another account of how average middle-aged working-class men became cold-blooded order followers for Germany. In a disturbing similarity the book 'Ordinary Men' the author warns us how average people can succumb to the pressures of a group setting inside a corp d'esprit of a budding police state and commit violent acts and even atrocities they would never do of their own volition. Essentially lays claim that peer group 'cultural' pressure can lead seemingly normal men to commit the most heinous of crimes. The level of detail in the indictments and interrogations of ex-Nazis was chilling, especially because it revealed just how ordinary the men who perpetrated extreme acts of violence evidently were. This inspired Browning, a historian to write 'Ordinary Men' using the testimonies of more than 125 policemen from Reserve Police Battalion 101 (RPB 101). 'We the people' did not authorise police to act and dress indiscernible from occupied combat soldiers - licensed to act without restraint - imposing martial law and suspending habeas corpus. History has amply demonstrated where this will end up ..

@MsLastof4

6 ай бұрын

Exclusionary rule aside, while the courts ignore a law that prohibits the use of illegally obtained evidence in a criminal trial, they also ignore obvious exculpatory evidence. These pretextual stops zero in on 'fishing' for crimes, even going as far as manufacturing narratives of crime for malicious prosecution. Far too much discretionary power is being welded under guise of authority. We know this from the 'Milgram Experiment' where just 'over 60% of research subjects would execute orders to k*ll or injure another human being if the order came from someone of authority, someone with a lab coat, uniform or title. "That the whole experiment was designed to see if ordinary Americans would obey immoral orders, as many Germans had done during the Nazi period." Holocaust survivor & psychologist Ervin Staub pioneered active bystander training to limit violence between police and the public. Staub survived the Nazis, then lived a decade under communism before becoming professor emeritus of psychology at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst. He spent decades studying violence, genocide and bystander activism around the world and back at home in the United States. He has written a shelf of books which expose emerging police states that allow mass atrocities, both past and present. Auschwitz survivor Sonia Klein warned "hate and silence can lead to murder. And I hope the people realize that sometimes history has a way of repeating itself." Holocaust survivor Vera Sharav is one of the most outspoken alarmists of these ominous parallels. She said in a recent speech, "If we are to avert another Holocaust, we must identify ominous current parallels before they poison the fabric of society .. I came to Nuremberg to provide historical context to the current global threat confronting our civilization. These past two and a half years have been especially stressful, as painful memories were rekindled." (75th Anniversary Event of the Nuremberg Code in Nuremberg, Germany, on August 20, 2022).

Taya The important thing to me was that the Neighbour approached police and gave a reference for the guy and cops just blew him off. He made 2 separate statements. ok He was probably his buddy but with policing like it is, purposely putting yourself in the line of fire is still a pretty impressive Reference. We shouldn't have to be afraid to monitor police / Gov actions. But deep in our hearts where we hardly dare to look we All are.

"I could arrest you..." WTF? Seriously, what could he arrest the guy for? Because some anonymous person said he was doing donuts.... has this cop got nothing better to do than try this crap?

Usually providing a supervisor upon request is in the police stations policy. Policy only applies to those who have signed the agreement. If cops can't follow their own policy how can they follow and uphold laws.

This poor guy is trying to deal with an unreasonable cop, WHILE AT THE SAME TIME, trying to stop his own companions from Wilding Out....

Our rights are not granted!!

Asking for a supervisor is like crying for your mommy

That is so stupid it does not deserve to be the topic in the conversation.

Not a statute for providing a supervisor if asked, it's a policy.

@joywest8411

6 ай бұрын

Statutes and Mandates are Not laws ...FYI. 💡

Please Join Us In Supporting PAR: www.patreon.com/accountabilityreports/membership

Thanks for this video. Happy Christmas!

It's getting serious, even more serious than at any time in the past, as regards police inventing causes to interrogate drivers, when there is no valid reason or cause to do so. Stay alert, be polite, ask questions that are pertinent.

If he was doing donuts, piglet could have smelled the tires. Simple investigation.

You can also hear hom telling his woman to calm down.

When the cop says im not trying too arrest you but wants to run you for warrants. How does that make sense

The tyrant first said he heard the donuts and reving the motor which made him hear and pull him over. Now he said it was a 911 call🤔

Please do a special on the reason/motivation/ incentive for getting citizens ID's Is it for financial rewards? Is it just harassment? Looking for a fight? Please elaborate

@gordongarrett6229

6 ай бұрын

Looks like a training failure to me. They are taught this unlawful stuff.

@PaTxVideographer

6 ай бұрын

They are hoping they have warrants, and in return, it's an arrest and a win for their bottom line. Most murders aren't solved because it's hard to close cases without the help of citizens, so the easiest way to give citations, arrests, and demand IDs for fishing are with traffic stops. Smh

@jamierupert7563

6 ай бұрын

​@@PaTxVideographerThat's the exact reason why. Looking for warrants to make an arrest. Any arrest.

@woodsrdr

6 ай бұрын

Cops are indoctrinated to believe that if they run everyone's name through their system, they will get murderous criminals off the street. The real reason is to allow government to eventually track every person in the country through a lack of anonymity. It's a requirement to successfully implement electronic currency as well as a social credit system to control income and spending. Cops are merely useful idiots in this situation.

The people in the car need to shut up and let him think about what he needs to do.

The fact that he was in his driveway is TOTALLY IRRELEVANT! Being in your doveway DOES NOT make you innocent! This isn't a game of tag. Your driveway is not your base.

if i'm at home ,and this happened i would have a reasonable suspicion that i'm talking to an idiot so the only thing to do is to remain silent give my i.d. and record for my lawsuit.

please cops if they had their way, they would arrest everyone that doe snot concede to their authority, if there is one thing a pi,, i mean cop hates, is you challenging their so called authority.

He's harassing a guy and the officer is thinking I wish I had a donut? He's confused😢

Is there any actual proof of him doing Donuts?

@MeMe-bg8ci

6 ай бұрын

Nope

The thing many miss is that "protect and serve" is a feel good motto...the supreme court found that cops are under no obligation to protect we the people

The cops heard they were making donuts. So,that's why they followed him.They were just hungry.lol

Funny how this officer says basically you have to give up your 4th amendment right before he will even entertain calling a supervisor. Like wtf.

IGNORANCE of the law is NO EXCUSE

Where’s the rest of the video? Is the resolution of the police encounter not filmed?

I am praying for your security. Almighty Allah pls protect this warrior of Truth. 🤲

@therealnews

6 ай бұрын

Thank you so much for the blessing! To you as well! 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏taya

You have the right to call his Sargent at any time. Call the non emergency number.

I'm here to tell you these things are loud, obnoxious, and annoying.

Those charges was dismissed today trying to find a civil rights lawyer now

Lady, your drive way doesn’t mean your home and you can’t do anything to me. Hell if your running from them they csn go in your house without a warrant.

We were not granted those rights. WE WERE BORN WITH THEM!

When the cop says:i am going to your ID and if theres no warrant i will let you go.That alone make me believe that this pig is on a fishing expedition😂

We were not "granted these rights hundreds of years ago!" These rights are inalienable and the government was forbidden to infringe these rights hundreds of years ago. There is an important distinction on that point.

We need to hold these cops families accountable for their actions and this would stop!

If you are operating a vehicle and have been lawfully pulled over then you have to ID! This was an unlawful stop and is shown in that because the officer didn't see anything that he wrote the tickets for!

@Sievers808

6 ай бұрын

Officers don't have to see everything to charge someone with a crime. That's a ridiculous misunderstanding of how the law works.

Taya and Stephen ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ yeah. Love you guys. Love your hard work.🎉🎉😂😂🎉😂

I THINK THEY RACIALLY PROFILED THIS MAN

Modified exhaust systems are illegal in every state.

@Sievers808

6 ай бұрын

They don't care, they've already decided all police are evil and therefore they all trample on our rights. We'll ignore the fact that this traffic stop was ENTIRELY reasonable and legal and that the driver failed to ID... They like to ignore what's right in front of them lol