Everybody forgets about ejection seats at KA-52, it gives a huge possibility to survive for pilots, and pilots are most expensive assets nowadays.

@klaabu99

10 ай бұрын

ka-52 need these seats because of operating in higher altitudes... it was also in video .. overall apache pilot have higher chance to survive

@X9xredgkoa

10 ай бұрын

@@klaabu99 source - trust me bro

@user-ir7fr1di2t

2 ай бұрын

Особенно в Испании🎉

@TheRealBillBob

2 ай бұрын

Pilots cost $32 million each?

@crips145

Ай бұрын

It's genius

In Ukraine, we see the Ka-52 in action, with its incredible survivability, when this helicopter can avoid a salvo of large numbers of American and British missiles and continues to fly even with its tail torn off. I doubt that Apache will show this result. This is a helicopter built on an outdated base, it does not even have an ejection system. Apaches were certainly good in the 80s and 90s, but after the Russians built the Aligator, those days are gone

@shalitharukmal8268

11 ай бұрын

💯💯💯

@noid717

11 ай бұрын

absolutely. hell of a copter

@vlat18

11 ай бұрын

5 of these copters have been shot down this week only by Ukraine forces LOL

@noid717

11 ай бұрын

@@vlat18 got some confirms?

@shalitharukmal8268

11 ай бұрын

@@vlat18 is there no any Chopper in invisible a****** 😏😏

Apache is a proven one only against small and country with very very weak defense. But Ka 52 is proven against entire NATO forces.

@feszty

9 ай бұрын

In your dreams

@niceguy76

9 ай бұрын

@@feszty nope....this is reality. maybe u just can't accept that. lol

@ceko3375

9 ай бұрын

This is the reality, all weapons made by Russia are against the US & NATO, while the US & NATO are against Arab countries whose technology is not as advanced as Russia. Greetings from Planet Mars

@carmelonold1090

9 ай бұрын

Please stop drinking alcohol 🤣🤣🤣

@feszty

9 ай бұрын

@@niceguy76 the KA-52 is a toy compared to the Cobra gunship. Plus, the KA-52 was never used against NATO, so I have no idea where you get that from.

There Isnt any comparison, the KA 52 is a beast with longer ranged weapons much higher survivability, heavier weapons payload & above all else. It's proven in a battle zone no apache has been anywhere near the level of.

@Jz-pu6jd

11 ай бұрын

If Iraqis had tens of thousands of manpads like ukronazis do, I wonder if any Apache or Blackhawk would be left flying.

@draka_ona3538

11 ай бұрын

those who praise apache, let them show a video against which systems apache opposes, that's how it really works against modern systems

Sorry to say this but as a pilot i would choose the ka52 above the apache anytime. Feels so much more capable to achieve mission then the apache.

@drno3391

11 ай бұрын

Yes but it was not "born in the USA"...

@aarontheaviationaddict3643

11 ай бұрын

@@drno3391 So?

@aarontheaviationaddict3643

11 ай бұрын

Plus, if your Ka-52 goes down, you have a chance of ejecting. If you’re in an Apache and your Apache goes down, you go down with it!

@bikechainmic

11 ай бұрын

What flight simulator do you base your opinion on?

@itaintgonnasuckitself4289

11 ай бұрын

@@bikechainmic The 'yo mama has a fat kunt' simulator

The apache has never went against a peer or near peer opponent Even then theyve been taken out by small arms fire The ka-52 has been placed into an environment that no other attack helicopter in history has even been faced with , even under these circumstances they did exceptionally well and proven to be a true nightmare to tank crews on the battlefield I think they're both great helicopters but I'd go with the ka-52

@mieszkokoniecpolski5621

11 ай бұрын

Ja ròwnież wybrał bym K-52👍

@glenatgoogle4393

11 ай бұрын

37 have been verified destroyed in Ukraine conflict.

@okand1921

11 ай бұрын

​@@glenatgoogle4393Since when destroyed means bad? I mean, I can tell you how Abrams was lost to DSHK fire and RPGs from 60s, does it make that tank bad?

@glenatgoogle4393

11 ай бұрын

@@BOM_NLD Source is Oryx which only lists documented losses with photos. Many of the citations concerning the KA52 are from Russian sources.

@glenatgoogle4393

11 ай бұрын

@@okand1921 -- If you're fighting Ukraine, and you're supposed to be the 2nd most powerful military on the planet and your premier attack helio has an approx 50% destroyed ratio --- that means bad.

There is a video where the ka52 damaged its tail and it calmly flies to the base, imagine what would happen to an apache with a damaged tail.

@TrevorSachko

11 ай бұрын

And how did its tail get damaged again? Ffs...

@SonElliot

11 ай бұрын

@@TrevorSachko missle uk shot to it and it still fly

@maksshapovalov413

11 ай бұрын

@@TrevorSachko from manpads

@TrevorSachko

11 ай бұрын

@@SonElliot The whole thing is on video, numbnuts. There was no missile.

@LordMarksman14

11 ай бұрын

Saw that video. The tail was gone but the Ka52 managed to return to base safely. Helicopters with tail rotors will spin uncontrollably.

KA-52 is totally a different type of helicopter than the Apache. The comparision between Mi-28 with Apache is realistic thinking.

@joshuaalistair3193

11 ай бұрын

Yes, but the Ka-52 is the helicopter Russia is using in Ukraine right now so it's getting a lot of attention, hence this video.

@udontknowme7798

11 ай бұрын

MI-28 would win over the Apache, no doubt

@joshuaalistair3193

11 ай бұрын

@@udontknowme7798 The Mi-28 looks impressive enough. I would still take the AH-64 but that's because I have flown it and know what it can do, or more to the point what the D model could do, the E apparently is better.

@bennoakes2477

11 ай бұрын

no one said had to be same type or similar so stop avoiding the question

@bennoakes2477

11 ай бұрын

​@@joshuaalistair3193 someone big-noting themselves, no one gives a fuck little boy

Apache has proved to be good in the use at shooting to small armed insurgents and donkeys. Watch the KA52 in real combat in Ukraine against real war machines.

@hztn

Жыл бұрын

- Ye, watch how dozens of those this paper tigers burning in Ukrainian fields being shot down even with AK's - don't miss it!

@javiergonzalez12138

11 ай бұрын

​@@hztn😂 source ?

@hztn

11 ай бұрын

@@javiergonzalez12138 - Lol, dude, youtube is full of it's crashed corpses, also a downing footage. Also a few captured Ka-52 where sent to USA for laughing, ahah.

@javiergonzalez12138

11 ай бұрын

@@hztn no sources lmao but why arent abrams in ukraine because they get captured 😉

@hztn

11 ай бұрын

@@javiergonzalez12138 - Looks like you did search in a lakhtapidor trashhole, hahah.

In my opinion, both cars are good, comparing them "head-on" is incorrect. Apache is trying to close the entire range of tasks of attack helicopters with one machine of different modifications, and the crocodile always has a friend "Cheburashka" (Mi-28) nearby. The Ka-52 is certainly a "tough nut to crack" - we all saw him calmly return home with his tail torn off, who accompanied him? Most likely it is the Mi-28, they have been working in pairs for a long time.* *По-моему обе машины хороши, сравнение их "лоб в лоб" некорректно. Апач пытается закрыть весь спектр задач ударных вертолётов одной машиной разных модификаций, а у "крокодила" всегда есть друг "чебурашка" (Ми-28) рядом. Ка-52, безусловно "крепкий орешек" - все мы видели, как он с оторваным хвостом спокойно домой вернулся, кто его сопровождал? Скорее всего именно Ми-28, они давно парами работают.

@glebnowak6340

9 ай бұрын

Этот не стабилизированный полёт сопровождал эвакуатор (эвакуационная команда на Ми-17). Часть балки разрушило дополнительными топливным баком при его неудачном сбросе.

@crips145

Ай бұрын

Logical thinking,and still tested in action.

If you want to fly and make butter at the same time the KA 52 is your weapon of choice.

The KA 52 is made for the today's battlefield, with a focus on long range ambushes, while the Apache is a Cold War relic, where Manpads weren't as prevalent/advanced.

@living-wellon-less5669

10 ай бұрын

Cold war relic, ROFLMAO!!! The KA-52's first flight was in 1982 during the cold war so bring it and watch our Blackhawks eat them for a snack! And if the KA-52 is "made for today's battlefield" why are Ukrainians shooting them down with Stingers and MANPADS? Take your cold war relic Russian garbage and stick it where the sun don't shine, I'm sure it will fit with room to spare!

@ghakon684

10 ай бұрын

Апачи проходил немало модернизаций, и учитывался опыт использования его в различных конфликтах по типу Ирака или Афганистана, а там поверь было немало различных пзрк и пво. Апач имеет хорошую электронику, бронирование, ракеты и скорость, называть его пережитком холодной войны такое себе, вполне боеспособный и эффективный ударный вертолёт

@wurzelbert84wucher5

10 ай бұрын

@@ghakon684 It was a bit exaggerated, yes. And you are right, these vehicles get upgrades with latest tech all the time. I bet the US army is having an eye (or two) on the conflict to see how things are going and how new devices like drones are changing the dynamics of the battlefield, so they can retrofit their stuff accodingly.

@oskart4237

10 ай бұрын

spot on

@living-wellon-less5669

10 ай бұрын

@@oskart4237 ROFLMAO

У Апача богатый боевой опыт. По количеству расстрелянных свадебных и похоронных процессий ему равных нет. А также по количеству убитых ослов и пастухов. Можно ли считать грозящий в небо кулак крестьянина и его проклятия - средством ПВО?

@kastriotgjini1952

11 ай бұрын

You forget the reporter of Reuters killed and showed by Asange

@drno3391

11 ай бұрын

Действительно хороший вопрос. Если подумать, афганские пещерные люди, вооруженные AK47, отдали свои задницы янки и были вознаграждены кучей новеньких игрушек...

@nixongamez1427

11 ай бұрын

Esas chatarras solo atacan a países pobresitos sin armas poderosas y ni así an podido tener victoria viva Rusia muerte Alós gringos patria libre o morir

@user-jj2my6dl1q

11 ай бұрын

Спасибо тебе брат!

@drno3391

11 ай бұрын

@@user-jj2my6dl1q Миллионы европейцев поддерживают Россию. КСТАТИ, что не так с Вагнером, действительно ли Шойгу бомбил их лагеря?

Yeah the Ka 52 is cool and all but its lacking the 30mm grenade Launcher like the Apache that can be used to mow down civilians and journalists

@DahTuTor

Жыл бұрын

😂😂😂

@larryphhihds4415

11 ай бұрын

Lol awesome!

@denkeylee

11 ай бұрын

It has a missile that can take out a tank at 100 km. Didn't see that coming did you, neither did the tanks.

@Amon-ht7po

11 ай бұрын

@@denkeylee what is that missile called ? 💀

@maksshapovalov413

11 ай бұрын

Like USA in Iraq?

Кто дотянет до своей базы с поля боя после выполнения задачи,тот и победил

@tn-titan6159

11 ай бұрын

It's a rip off Apache.

@unoriginalname4321

11 ай бұрын

Well, the Ka-52 is less likely make it back because Ivan the conscript was too drunk to perform basic maintenance and traded the fuel for more vodka.

@sandorkovacs4078

11 ай бұрын

Ha sikerrel végezte el a feladatát akkor nyert. Ha csak letudta úgy ahogy, az csak kettes alá.

@bennadinayandex1207

9 ай бұрын

@@unoriginalname4321 try again with a harder cope

Apache and K-52 helicopters were really designed for two different combat functions. The Apache was designed for nap of the earth ambush attack. The K- 52 was designed for a higher reconnaissance attack mode. The idea of the K-52 was to attack from a distance and to spot targets for other ground systems. This is why the Apache has targeting pod on top of the rotor while the K-52 it's pod is underneath. Essentially the two helicopters will function best in different environments an terrain. Since the K-52 operates at higher altitudes the pilot ejection system makes sense while the Apache operating at low altitude does not have such a system (The Apache does have energy absorbing landing gear and seats to make nap of earth shoot downs more survivable.). Both helicopters would have trouble doing what the other helicopter is designed to do. Both are very good helicopters.

@rb5337

10 ай бұрын

That is an excellent analysis of what their true purpose in combat is.

10 ай бұрын

Apache is ana Attack helicopter and Alligator is a Flying tank.

@mr.coilsgarage1739

10 ай бұрын

lol this is wrong...Apache has a radar on top. Both have targeting pods on the front.

@jgy4iydoshik

10 ай бұрын

​@ там танком и не пахнет, он простреливается с АК.

@vadimarman7291

10 ай бұрын

​@@jgy4iydoshikсам лично обстреливал???😂😂😂

The Apache performs well in movies & against goat herders while the KA 52 performs well on the battlefield

@sealoftheliving4998

11 ай бұрын

Prove me. Where?

@jgarbo3541

11 ай бұрын

@@sealoftheliving4998 Apache is a toy. The Alligator is now practically untouchable, with a new Vitebsk-25 EW system. Recently, in Ukraine, survived 18 missiles attacks, not a scratch -- in a real war. The Apache is good with goats...

@tonyradoina9147

11 ай бұрын

OK Russian fanboy how come the Russians cant achieve air superiority, and have not advance given the mighty Alligator. Get real, ask every country with Russian hardware that faced US military power how they fared.

@tonyradoina9147

11 ай бұрын

@@jgarbo3541 😂You're funny a year in in Ukraine that does not have attack helicopters nor a real airforce and Russia is still where they started over a year ago. So explain to us why with this great attack helicopter they've done no damage to Ukrainian ground forces. Just another Armata all hype.

@tonyradoina9147

11 ай бұрын

@@yanksbiglywvil This is not the counter offensive you clown its probing Russian defenses, by the way how's the great Russian military doing when they cant top a small rebel force from reaching Moscow, hell they gave up nearly there. Russia is a military joke, like you.

Apache is a very good attack helicopter but was always used only with the privilege of air superioritiy. And in the most cases against enemies without almost any air defense systems. Ka-52 Alligator is active in the middle of the hornets nest against all kind of Soviet and NATO air defenses...and it is very very successful. The Apache has not the amount of modern shot vehicles than the Alligator. The Ka-52 is by far the most effective Helicopter today.

@jamesreese1999

11 ай бұрын

The KA 52 gets knocked out of the sky every time it flies near Ukrainian positions. Some have even been shot down with Javelins---which aren't even designed for low-flying aircraft! Every Russian pilot who flies a KA 52 should make sure his last will and testament are up to date, and that he has already picked out his coffin.

@foshizzlfizzl

11 ай бұрын

@@jamesreese1999 is that what you heard from Ukrainian Leopard 2 crews? 😂😂😂😂Don't embarrass yourself! Next time they tell you that they shot down a Tie Fighter, a death star and a black hole.

@LSL-Rus

11 ай бұрын

​@@jamesreese1999только почему то украина проигрывает и прячет остатки авиации в Румынии вот так страна победитель это ваша украина

@AntonBrant

11 ай бұрын

@@jamesreese1999 You tell this nonsense to your grandmother in the kitchen on dark Ukrainian evenings. Don't wishful thinking.

@ashokkumarchakaravarthy471

11 ай бұрын

KA 52 is Best now....with Aoache being the second....

After seeing the performance of alligator in Ukraine you now know it surpasses apache by far.

@vprok94

11 ай бұрын

I saw how he was shot down with anti-tank systems, indeed, in this regard, he surpassed Apache 😂

@glenatgoogle4393

11 ай бұрын

It's been reported that the KA52 has had a total of 170 units built. Approximately 75 of them were "sent" to Ukraine. Of those 75, 37 have been shot down. Some performance, eh, 50% kill ratio.

@aarontheaviationaddict3643

11 ай бұрын

@@glenatgoogle4393 37 have been shot down, only in the first few months of the war. Now these choppers are back in action on the Zaparozhye front, and have been used to devastating effect, with no losses this time. That’s because of the new tactics by the Russian pilots. You should’ve seen them take out the Leopard 2s and Bradleys, those so-called Western “indestructible wunderwaffens”.

@glenatgoogle4393

11 ай бұрын

@@aarontheaviationaddict3643 "first few months"??? The latest, excluding the one Wagner took out, was May 23, 2023. Prior to that April 10, prior that March 16th. First few months? Really? Granted they've improved their tactics (stand off 10 or so miles and shoot longer range laser guided missiles ) but your assertion that only in the first few months is silly. Let me add that the 37 are only CONFIRMED entries. There may have been still more. Still, the confirmed entries yields a 50% kill ratio. March 16th was in Zaporizhzhia Oblast

@aarontheaviationaddict3643

11 ай бұрын

@@glenatgoogle4393 Before we get sidetracked, we are discussing the performance of the Ka-52, which means the full potential of the Ka-52. So while you may be right about the additional losses, those losses were the result of poor use. Now, during the Ukrainian Zaparozhye offensive, this is where the Ka-52s are unleashing their full potential, hence why I’m mentioning the Zaparozhye front. Also, there’s footage of a Ka-52 that had dodged 16 Stingers before finally getting hit on the tail, and the crew still managed to fly that thing back to base. Please note that the Ka-52s are currently engaging a powerful enemy supplied with modern, strong air defences from NATO. The AH-64 Apache meanwhile has had only engaged weak and ill-equipped forces and insurgents with little to no air defences. And even then, we’ve had multiple cases of Apache losses. So why hype up the Ka-52 losses when the Apache also suffered losses?

The KA52 can take a hammering, is slightly quicker and more maneuverable. It's real advantage is if it gets so badly hit, the pilot and crew can still survive by ejecting and live to fly and fight another day. In the same scenario, the Apache pilot/crew is doomed to go down with the helicopter. If I was spending the money, I would definitely not buy the Apache if given the option of the KA52.

@dew7025

Жыл бұрын

ka52 is dropping like flies

@SailingRhapsode

Жыл бұрын

@@dew7025 yeah right. Bring the evidence.

@dew7025

Жыл бұрын

@@SailingRhapsode the pilots died the missile approach warning system is junk on the ka52 it deployed flares after it was already hit

@SailingRhapsode

Жыл бұрын

@@dew7025 there i no evidence that the KA52 is "dropping like flies" as you said.

@dew7025

Жыл бұрын

@@SailingRhapsode did you not see the video? I can send more cope

Man I'd love to fly the Ka-52!

@williamstephens9945

11 ай бұрын

Great if you're on a suicide mission.

@shalitharukmal8268

11 ай бұрын

💯💯🇷🇺🇷🇺

@TodaysDemocrat

11 ай бұрын

Ukraine has a few after slapping Russia and taking them

@tn-titan6159

11 ай бұрын

Rip off Apache.

@joshuaalistair3193

11 ай бұрын

@@TodaysDemocrat Ukraine doesn't have any and while they may slap Russia, Russia is punching Ukraine.

Apache doesn't have an ejection system and a cabin reservation, so Apache is a flying coffin. Apache was created to fight against virtually unarmed.

@jasonstickitmoore

11 ай бұрын

More reason to respect the commitment of the the crew to be elite and survive. ah64 can fire miles away and even from behind cover proven effective

@maksshapovalov413

11 ай бұрын

​@@jasonstickitmoore The crew of the AH-64 Apache helicopter tried to repeat the trick of the Ka-52 pilots and crashed the helicopter. A few hours ago, the crew of a Greek AH-64 Apache combat helicopter was spotted performing strange maneuvers. Apparently, the crew of the combat helicopter tried to perform a complex trick similar to the one that was recently demonstrated by the crew of the Ka-52 attack and reconnaissance helicopter. However, either due to insufficient maneuverability of the NATO helicopter, or due to pilot error, the rotorcraft could not gain altitude in time and crashed into the water.

@maksshapovalov413

11 ай бұрын

@@jasonstickitmoore The crew of the AH-64 Apache helicopter tried to repeat the trick of the Ka-52 pilots and crashed the helicopter. A few hours ago, the crew of a Greek AH-64 Apache combat helicopter was spotted performing strange maneuvers. Apparently, the crew of the combat helicopter tried to perform a complex trick similar to the one that was recently demonstrated by the crew of the Ka-52 attack and reconnaissance helicopter. However, either due to insufficient maneuverability of the NATO helicopter, or due to pilot error, the rotorcraft could not gain altitude in time and crashed into the water.

@jorgegonzalez-pv8mv

11 ай бұрын

How many pilots ejected in Ukraine? None.

@Truffle_Young_Jr

11 ай бұрын

@@jorgegonzalez-pv8mv Because even hit badly the pilots always managed to land or make it to the base due to coaxial rotor system. Beside Ka 52 has more protection armour.

Apache would be more comparable to the MI 28 Havok, the Ka 52 is in a different class.

@OLEG-gt2yt

11 ай бұрын

To what "different" class? Both helicopters are positioned as reconnaissance and attack helicopters. It's just that the US has nothing better than this tin can. However, the Mi-28 will also, without a doubt, kick the Apache's ass.

@sevalevik

11 ай бұрын

Mi-28 Weight, kg: - empty: 7890 - normal takeoff: 10900 -maximum takeoff: 12100 Engine type: 2 x GTD VK-2500P - power, kW: 2 x 1838 maximum speed, km/h: 324 Cruise speed, km/h: 265 Ferry range, km: 1105 Practical range, km: 500 Rate of climb, m/min: 816 Practical ceiling, m: 5600 Static ceiling, m: 3600 Crew, people: 2 Armament: 1 x 30 mm 2A42 cannon with 300 rounds UAV control capability.

@THEREareTWoGENDERS2

11 ай бұрын

The alligator is a rip off Apache.

@living-wellon-less5669

10 ай бұрын

@@OLEG-gt2yt Russia needs you to teach their chopper pilots because in Ukraine if it flies it DIES! SLAVA Stinger missile!!! SLAVA UKRAINI!!!

@fevgg

10 ай бұрын

@@living-wellon-less5669 иди на хуй со своей украиной. везде суете свои нацистские приветсвия. заебали всех уже

RUSKO KA 52 ALIGATOR RÝCHLOST 352 KM BOJOVNOSŤ NESKUTOČ ČNÁ SILA NA NEBI SUPER STROJ 👍 🤔

I think most countries drool over ka-52 for years now

@tn-titan6159

11 ай бұрын

It's a rip off Apache.

@fourtabsgod64

11 ай бұрын

@@tn-titan6159 maybe USA should spend some money on making better ones then and sell them to countries so they can test them in conflicts around the globe and later share combat data to maker , this is how arms industry works pretty much , USA has f22 and f35 but does not have combat data on any of them f22 shot down a balloon while Russia has vast amounts of combat data on their airplanes + bombers , also USA when designing new airplanes for decades now has very bad behaviour of releasing too much information to the public because of these information acts and adversaries can take this information and use it against USA , there are countries like Russia and China where no one knows a Jack shit about new systems also France and Norway are very secretive

I would also add that for the price of 1 Appatch Apache AH64, you can buy 15 Alligators KA 52

@shalitharukmal8268

11 ай бұрын

😅💯

@jayjohnson5592

10 ай бұрын

No you can't. The apache was $3,000,000 more per unit. 35 to 32 million each

KA 52 Alligator all the way ! Tried and true in a REAL fight !

@JC4Life3

11 ай бұрын

The alligator is a rip off Apache. The New AH64E comes out in 2028. This is one of our oldest helicopters lol

@sandorkovacs4078

11 ай бұрын

​@@JC4Life32028? Azt meg is kell élni. Imádkozz jézushoz, talán sikerül megélned.

@az6877

8 ай бұрын

@@sandorkovacs4078don’t pray to Jesus pray to the One who created Jesus in the stomach of his honourable mother. No God comes out of woman’s lower part.

@nueng-vq3vc

25 күн бұрын

​@@az6877What​ is​ wrong​ with​ you?

And the winner is the K A.

We forgot to mention that the KA-52 is the only helicopter that has a crew ejection system. The rest of the helicopters are flying coffins.

@KingofDoubleBogey

10 ай бұрын

There’s not one video that shows this Russian ejection system being used successfully or if it even works correctly - who in their right mind would actually attempt this - oh yeah Russia, the mighty Russian Military

@user-xo9kz7he4i

10 ай бұрын

@@KingofDoubleBogey The Ka-52 is a completely Soviet development. And the Soviet documentation provides for a crew rescue system. How this is implemented in hardware is unknown, because the Russian military-industrial complex is not Soviet. But I think if the USSR had lived a little longer, we would have seen it. The USSR has not been with us for thirty years... but the mighty Soviet military-industrial complex still gives the West a shit. By the way, Russia has not even started to develop something of its own... all Russian new weapons are Soviet developments.

Weakest point of the apache is its tail rotor while the KA-52 can fly without its tail.

@joshuaalistair3193

11 ай бұрын

The KA-52 was not designed to fly without its tail, yet it can. The Apache was not designed to fly without its tail, yet it can. BTW, every Apache I can think of that was shot down was not hit in the tail.

@ExDemocrat123

11 ай бұрын

Good pilots don't get hit. That's why we didn't bother because we don't plan on taking direct hits.

@tongobong1

11 ай бұрын

KA-52 is a crap.

@joshuaalistair3193

11 ай бұрын

@@ExDemocrat123 Thank you for clarifying that America has a lot of bad pilots then. In fact, some of our best pilots must have been bad pilots after all. I really do like it when people like you can come around to help us understand things.

@joshuaalistair3193

11 ай бұрын

@@tongobong1 Why?

In other words the Russian beats the hell out of the Apache in all the important requisites 😂😂😂😂 the fire power of the beast is impressive!

@TodaysDemocrat

11 ай бұрын

I wonder how many Russian troops will surrender and cry on camera today? Lol

@ele4853

11 ай бұрын

@@TodaysDemocrat You should signed up to the military. Gen. Milley would love to receive you with open heart! you guys can throw a drag queen party to the troops in Ukraine. They need moral support to keep sending troops to die.

@TodaysDemocrat

11 ай бұрын

@@ele4853 Trump 2024

@TodaysDemocrat

11 ай бұрын

@@ele4853 The alligator is a rip-off Apache.

@ele4853

11 ай бұрын

​@@TodaysDemocrat Unfortunately, the whole election system is rigged and we all know that. Have you seen what Katie Lake exposed? Why is it that the big guy never went out to do campaigns? He know he was going to "win". As he did. Yea right! tell me lies I love it LOL many already try to address the problem with the corrupt machines and software and the "system" said. There's no time to change the software. Really? off course not. The election 2024 is already rigged. BTW, votes don't win election. Donors and software do the job. Terrible. America is done my friend. Tyrants took over and they are going to control every single aspect of ours lives from now on. This is just the beginning. The big guy and his son has committed so many crimes. Arrest Trump! WOW! yes, this is America today. Beautiful to not say the contrary.

Ka52 is the winner.

@f-35lightningii6

11 ай бұрын

No. KA-53 don’t win, Don’t good combat war.. AH-64 high quality course combat war..

@bikechainmic

11 ай бұрын

But looses in battle. Zero combat rating, the kiddies helicopter

@mr.waffentrager4400

11 ай бұрын

​@@bikechainmicBradley getting destroyed by kamov, literally a video of thermal sight on the web

These are both strong systems however neither are immune to modern manpad / AA systems. The Apache has not really fought an modern advanced foe like the KA-52 is doing atm. To be fair i think which ultimately is better is more dictated by crew doctrine and skill as well as tactics and not the least support and overall joint forces cooperations etc play a massive part. Neither of these are wonder weapons. One thing that has impressed me though is how sturdy the KA-52 is and has really shown the advantages or having a coacial rotor system as they don't spin out of controll as fast as the more conventional helicopters designs like the Apache, Hind and Havoc and seems to have a much higher chance of a controlled crashlanding. I would not be surprised if we see new western helicopter designs with that pop up after seeing this in Ukraine.

@OLEG-gt2yt

11 ай бұрын

You forgot to mention the ejection seats of the Ka-52, unlike the Apache. Training a good pilot is expensive, so the Russians took care of their pilots. There's probably an excess of pilots in the states, they don't need catapults.

@tn-titan6159

11 ай бұрын

The alligator is a rip off Apache.

@Jacob-bj6bm

11 ай бұрын

The Apache can stay hidden miles away and hit targets with precision. KA 52s can't do that. (Apache Hellfire anti-tank missiles have a range of more than 3.7 miles and can penetrate the armor of any known main battle tank) wonder why it's called the Apache? You can't see it or hear it.

@XCougar85X

11 ай бұрын

@@Jacob-bj6bm The KA-52 can exactly do that too. The Apache is a fantastic platform but just as vulnerable as a KA-52 on a modern battlefield

@tongobong1

11 ай бұрын

@@XCougar85X on paper KA-52 is great. In reality it is crap like everything that Russian army industry produced in the last 40 years. You can see a video of KA-52 losing its tail in the middle of the flight.

Both are lethal warmachines in paper, but only the Ka-52 has actual experience against modern armor, which is going pretty good for it so far.

@TrevorSachko

11 ай бұрын

Really? Actuality tells a different story. 60 dead 52's tell a similar story.

@hewydewy2164

11 ай бұрын

Lol Apaches sniped tanks in the gulf wars

@Fload.Ritlhe

11 ай бұрын

@@hewydewy2164Would that be tanks with absolutely no air defence systems, O yes that’s correct, and let’s not forget the US had air superiority.

@jesusojeda7850

11 ай бұрын

@@hewydewy2164 keyword "modern"

@scissortech6005

11 ай бұрын

Wrong , the apache has a longer , more proven battle record . It has destroyed plenty of the Russian tanks . Also have to consider the US always gains air superiority first on the battle field.

The KA-52 is a killing machine.

KA -52 is my admired weapon

There was a video of a ka-52 flying with its tail torn of. This is already unthinkable for an apache.

@Maddog-xc2zv

10 ай бұрын

yeah, but apaches are still flying. same can't be said about almost half of russian ka-52s fleet. just stating the obvious with deepening in the propaganda around the chopper, like russia did with the t-14 armata and the failure the su-57 fellon is.

@dmitrimikrioukov5935

10 ай бұрын

@@Maddog-xc2zv I don't remember the US using Apache in a conflict where its opponent had military donations more than the entire US military budget...

@jafarhon

10 ай бұрын

@@dmitrimikrioukov5935 The amount of money, equipment, modern technology, high speed internet, drones, now imagine if Afghanistan had all this support, i dont think US would stay there for more than a month, Russia is doing great against all this modern technology, our news said that Russia wont last for more than a few month, its been more than a year and they still there, at this pace Russia will bankrupt everyone, because we are feeling the pain already, our money taken down and sent to Ukraine.

@Maddog-xc2zv

10 ай бұрын

@@dmitrimikrioukov5935 no one else hsa such budget, not even china is close to those figures. Russia then... you seem to continue to think you're still living the days of the long gone (30 years more or less) USSR and the Varsow Pact. Russias seems to be in need of a bath of reality and I believe you're really getting it with the negative results of the war on Ukraine, euphemistecaly called Special Military Operation when was a (failled) full scale invasion. Wake up to the XXIst century.

It would be closer comparison with Mi-28 Night Hunter KA -52 is another level

Alligator fought in a real war while Apache is only tested against unarmed civilian population.

Апач не вертолёт поля боя.За счёт снижения броневой нагрузки он может нести больше вооружения. Ка-52 более универсален и живуч. Так что одно дело носорог,другое - бегемот....Дурость,правда?

Well, KA-52 showed the real stuff in recent days. Those Leopard tanks had no chance.

@OLEG-gt2yt

11 ай бұрын

there was a chance - not to come to the place of combat contact.

@Skooffy

11 ай бұрын

@@OLEG-gt2yt Indeed.

@TheMihaiMarinescu

11 ай бұрын

Yes! 😁 Be sure you still say how good it is as quickly as possible because 37 are already shut down. It is obvious why they designed the ejection seats! Russia is a 🤡

@juanpablochaconvargas6919

11 ай бұрын

Yeah those tractors were an easy target ;)

@polpol9375

11 ай бұрын

tanks hit mines and that's it

The different is the ATGM. Both are good but America one is too expensive. 111k for single hellfire? While rusia with vikhr only 30k-35k

@harukrentz435

11 ай бұрын

I found america war equipments to be highly overpriced. I think having limitless budget kinda shape this mindset.

@sandorkovacs4078

11 ай бұрын

Össze lopják az árát a jenkik, azért terrorizálják a világot.

This is like comparing bananas and oranges , two completely different helicopters

A helicopter with coaxial rotors has relatively small dimensions, is quite compact, which simplifies its maintenance, storage, transportation, and expands its scope. Small dimensions, reducing the mass difference, create small moments of inertia, so the helicopter has high angular speeds of rotation and high maneuverability. The symmetrical layout with minimal propeller spacing simplifies piloting in gusty wind conditions, which is especially valuable when working from ships or in mountainous terrain. No bulky tail

@MG-Nordster

Жыл бұрын

Truth of the matter is manpads of any brand, will bring down helicopters, regardless what kind. The Coaxial heli's which is more a Russian design than Western, has been used on their carriers in the past.I am not sure if it increases speed. But to me, side by side cockpit presents a wider target for froontal attack.

@sherainagustus9529

Жыл бұрын

theres a video of a ka52 pilot who stumbles on a madpads truck and bc he cant swing the nose canon had to contiue out in egress and couldnt suppress or anything and this cause him to get nailed!!!! apaches is better!!!!

@necsoiub

Жыл бұрын

@@sherainagustus9529 There's also a documented event when an Apache was brought down by a single shot from a world war 2 rifle. And there's a video where a KA-52 took multiple MANPADS hits, kept flying but the pilot had to eventually land safely in a field. KA-52 is better!!!

@sherainagustus9529

Жыл бұрын

@@necsoiub that documented apache thing was debunked i know the ne you talking about

@sherainagustus9529

Жыл бұрын

@@necsoiub ka 52 is not on level with ah64 for a buncha reasons

You can not compare them so far the apache just fought goat sheeppers ,farmers and civilians in a van , in documentaries and movies also performed well

@johnrussell3755

11 ай бұрын

hahaha

@mirandela777

11 ай бұрын

And they are great at killing children, remember Assange and "collateral murder" !

@tonyradoina9147

11 ай бұрын

Right, then why is Russia struggling in Ukraine that does not have attack helicopters or an airforce. Meanwhile Russia is doing such a great job that its mercenaries tried a coup.

@mirandela777

11 ай бұрын

@@tonyradoina9147 - abc, for illiterate adults: russians use only some 10% of their forces in Ukr ! The rest is kept in reserve for a potential, much bigger war with NATO. Facts for you: they have over 3500 jets, in Ukr they use only 2-300 ! b) not "mercenaries" who try a coup, but a small detachment of Prigozhin loyal one, under 1000 guys. Do you really think you could take Moscow with 1000 guys ?! If you do think so, search for medical help. PS - Ukr DID HAVE an air force, kid ! Guess what - they lost ALL of them (99%) then they lost couple hundreds more ( those sent by ex East Eu NATO countries ! ) ! Here, educate yourself: "The IISS assesses the overall force size as 817 aircraft of all types and 43,100 personnel. The aviation corps had actually be reorganised into regional air ..." That ALL was wiped out, and score some hundreds more from external help.

@richardvargas2190

11 ай бұрын

@@mirandela777 hahahaha "10% of their forces"

Ka52🔥

@diclo383

2 жыл бұрын

That's a visual representation of how they catch fire easily?

@99Yeti

2 жыл бұрын

@@diclo383 I believe it is

У ка-52 даже катапульт есть для двух пилотов и винты отстреливаться. Ну какой апачи?

@osbourne3084

11 ай бұрын

что то этого в Украине не замечал. разваливались на запчасти.а от пилотов один пепел оставался.

@user-wp5zw8qp4t

11 ай бұрын

@@osbourne3084 ты это видел как разваливается?

@osbourne3084

11 ай бұрын

@@user-wp5zw8qp4t конечно.от стингера одни запчасти остаются.

I like the KA 52 better. More weapons & better performance

@klaabu99

10 ай бұрын

no u got it wrong ...apache have more weapons ... and better weapons ... ka-52 can have just more different type of weapons(on paper)

Ka 52 stopped the Rebellion with one shot.

Ka52 is way ahead compared to Apache..... And time tested beast....

Apache fights against insurgents whose most lethal weapon is RPG while ka-52 takes ona. Country's army with SAM

As per comparison, Kaa the Russian helicopter has superiority over US Apache.

@joshuaalistair3193

11 ай бұрын

Oh? How so?

@shalitharukmal8268

11 ай бұрын

Yes bro 💯💯💯🔥🔥🔥🔥🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺

@bennoakes2477

11 ай бұрын

@@joshuaalistair3193 you really know jack shit

@mattdowning7281

11 ай бұрын

Not necessarily. We don't have quite enough combat info on the KA-52. The Apache did very well in both wars in Iraq. It looks like the Russians are taking heavier losses of what I consider to be a great helicopter, the KA

@joshuaalistair3193

11 ай бұрын

@@mattdowning7281 Sure, but you can't say the Ka-52 is better or worse based upon some losses in Ukraine. Ukraine has weapons that Iraq and Afghanistan didn't have so you would expect higher losses, even if it were the Apache the Russians were flying instead of the Ka.

The KA52 is the winer. This is my expert opinion based on their stats and avaliable video reports.

@joshuaalistair3193

11 ай бұрын

The AH-64 is the winner. This is my expert opinion having flown it in combat.

@playaz7777

11 ай бұрын

@@joshuaalistair3193 the ka52 is the winner.this is my expert opinion based on what i see on youtube and internet footage

@JohnHoltkeJohnRHoltke

10 ай бұрын

@@playaz7777 Having called in Apache's in multiple theaters, Desert Storm, Panama, Haiti and a few I can't freaking mention.. I SAW an Apache take out a Hind and a Hip & recently a KA-52 in Syria as it just wasn't armed with Air to Air and the Apache got behind it and gunned it down. Apache pilots, damn the platform, are of higher quality which is what matters. But what do I know, I'm just a stupid MARSOC Marine with 38 years of calling in birds experience. I'm telling you, pound for pound, Hind's included, there isn't a heart flying a Russian helicopter that our platform and training and the absolute audacity of our pilots, it's no match... Just it's easier than training watching it real, first hand, no videos needed. Semper Fi..

The Ka-52 is a real combat proven helicopter while the Apache is more designed to scare the enemy

I trust the KA52 superior than the Apache. You can see in KZread how the KA52 can take few manpad round and yet still flying doing his sortie. If Apache it would already have crashed earlier.

@hztn

Жыл бұрын

- Ok, give me a link to a vid vith couple manpads hits, cause everywhere it downed with one hit.

@joshuaalistair3193

11 ай бұрын

So, what is a few MANPAD rounds? Do MANPADs even have rounds? What Ka52 has taken a few (meaning three or more) MANPADs and flown back home? While I have no doubt that the Ka may survive a single MANPAD hit, I highly doubt they would survive two MANPAD hits let alone a few. Also, the Apache, like the Ka, can survive a MANPAD hit. Like the KA, it all depends where the missile hits.

@user-gy6mh8qi1z

10 ай бұрын

​@@hztnвраг

The Iraqi armed forces turned out to be better equipped than the Afghan formations, which is why in just over four years (from March 2003 to July 2007), NATO forces lost 31 AH-64 helicopters of various modifications.

@tn-titan6159

11 ай бұрын

Fake News.

@NotOnDrugs

11 ай бұрын

that's actually pretty good, opposed to what the Russians have lost in a year.

@maksshapovalov413

11 ай бұрын

@@NotOnDrugs This is only in Iraq, Apaches are only good to fight against unarmed, the US has not yet given them to Ukraine because they are afraid that someone from the ak 47 will collect this scrap metal.

@fevgg

10 ай бұрын

@@NotOnDrugs Ukrainians are not Iraqi and weapon not the same

@randallmcmurphy6709

10 ай бұрын

@@NotOnDrugs how big a brain do you need to have to compare the Iraqi air defense (what the Soviet Union gave them) and the air defense of Ukraine, which received the second largest piece of the army and weapons of the Soviet Union?

Apache is getting long in the tooth. Looks like the Russians have the edge in attack helicopters now. Where the Apache has the longbow to designate targets as a scout the KA-52 can link to drones as scouts and designate and lock with laser so KA-52 can be used as a missile truck from 10km out.

@tn-titan6159

11 ай бұрын

The alligator is a rip off Apache. The new AH64E comes out in 2028.

@mikevars8979

11 ай бұрын

@@tn-titan6159 that nice that the new Apache comes out. There is nothing even remotely a copy of the Apache in the KA-52, you you have eyes or are you blind?

@tn-titan6159

11 ай бұрын

@@mikevars8979 Nothing Russia has matches the technology of American aircraft. Put down the vodka.

@mikevars8979

11 ай бұрын

@@tn-titan6159 Western superiority complex. It has always been a back and forth technology race. While we were distracted by counter insurgency Russia and China we're catching up and surpassing us. The Apache is long in the tooth and doesn't have the superior edge it once had.

@mikevars8979

11 ай бұрын

@@tn-titan6159 🤣 what the overpriced and problem riddled F-35. Please you need to get over your western superiority complex. We have not always been the best and we slipped this time.

The K52 looks more like a bomber than a helicopter

Don't ever compare this US paper tiger to Russian realdeal

@robertdemaree2165

11 ай бұрын

I see u post All the time commie USA military best in the world slaughter Russia in a week

@tn-titan6159

11 ай бұрын

I wonder how many Russian troops will surrender and cry on camera today? Lol

@TodaysDemocrat

11 ай бұрын

​@@robertdemaree2165He's upset Russia soldiers are crying on TV waiving white flags. Lol

@THEREareTWoGENDERS2

11 ай бұрын

Don't ever compare that rip off Apache to the real thing! 🇺🇲

@user-vb1jl6og6b

11 ай бұрын

​@@THEREareTWoGENDERS2это вобще две разные системы и близко не плагиат

The winner is definitely KA-52

@joshuaalistair3193

11 ай бұрын

Oh? Why is that?

@f-35lightningii6

11 ай бұрын

No, KA-52 don’t win in Ukraine war.. KA-52 poor.. AH-64 high quality course combat war..

Apache is better compared to Mi-28. Ka-52 is in a league of its own with active protection, dual-rotor advantages (agility, speed, survivability), pilot ejection system, etc.

@tn-titan6159

11 ай бұрын

It's a rip off Apache.

@wolfdima

11 ай бұрын

@@tn-titan6159 where? Ka-52 is totally different concept

@arikauraniemi9383

11 ай бұрын

37 alligators shot down in this conflict. How many pilots ejected? According to photos not many, they were dead in the air. It's a flying coffin, just like any other russian vehicle. Do you know why kamov decided to put the pilots side-by-side instead of tandem? There's a special reason for it. Kamov's studies told that pilots are more willing to fly to their deaths when they can look each other eye to eye.

@user-vb1jl6og6b

11 ай бұрын

​@@arikauraniemi9383если ка 52 с бронированной кабиной и с катопультой летающий гроб то что тогда апач да и любой другой вертолёт?

@sandorkovacs4078

11 ай бұрын

​@@arikauraniemi9383Vicces meglátás, de harc közben jobban tudnak kommunikálni, ez is egy előnye.

Ka-52 can fly over HELL and come back....

No contest, KA 52 is a much superior machine in all possible domains, they even have ejector seats.....

@dew7025

Жыл бұрын

its missile approach warning system is useless it dumped flares after being already hit by a missile LOL

@Jessie_James850

Жыл бұрын

Where are Ka52 in Ukraine? Ukrainians smoke them, just like other russian trsh from sky.

@FoodwaysDistribution

Жыл бұрын

@@Jessie_James850 you sound like the local imbecile, go read a book and educate yourself

@hztn

Жыл бұрын

- No they don't have ejection seats - that's another russian lie and propaganda.

@FoodwaysDistribution

Жыл бұрын

@@hztn 🤡🤡🤡

Апач воевал против моджахедов в шлёпанцах с ржавыми калашами, а КА-52 уже год разьёбует всю самую передовую технику НАТО и США. Так что же лучше - красивая картинка или реальный боец?

I like KA 52 helicopter. The best one......❤

KA 52 is the world unmatched attack helicopter I've ever seen and proven a US proxy war in Ukraine a superb dominance air power superiority.

@chevyjohnson7457

11 ай бұрын

Russia started this war.

@Tam0de

11 ай бұрын

LoL. How many have crashed & burned in Ukraine? Too many to keep track.

@glenatgoogle4393

11 ай бұрын

@@Tam0de 37 have been documented. Plus Prigozhin's group shot down at least one while they were traveling toward Moscow.

@fourtysevenak

11 ай бұрын

@@glenatgoogle4393 yeah yeah ... ukraine claims to shoot them , without any proof , according to thier own data russia had 20 ka52 in service , ukraine claims to shoot down at least 2000 of those 20 , and not long ago those non existing helicopters decimated leopard 2 and bradley tanks in a catastrophic long awaited offensive .... keep dreaming

@USERZ123XD

11 ай бұрын

@@Tam0de well it is pretty impressive that a lot of people who are currently fighting in Ukraine saying the Ka 52 is very tough and powerful, the helicopter also successfully saved quite a few of it's pilots life even when it was fatally hit by ejecting the pilots to safety.

Lots of Russian bobble heads here today. The Apache has better sensors, heavier armament, and more importantly, better crew training and tactics.

@joejohnson1004

11 ай бұрын

In Hollywood yes...

@user-vb1jl6og6b

11 ай бұрын

Это ты балван из Америки, который верит в какое то мнимое превосходство пилотов людей, Гитлер кстати так же думал что один немецкий солдат стоит роты русских, откуда ты взял что у вас подготовка лучше? Из Голливуда, российские офицеры получают реальный боевой опыт против армии с генералитетом со всеми родами войск под обстрелами ПВО , кстати российской авиацией управляют офицеры которые сначала учатся в вузах на учебной технике потом на боевой на протяжении 5 лет затем уже в воинских частях в местах службы на летывают часы так же отрабатывают маневры , на сколько я знаю в Америке на веоталетаж летают всякие мастере сержанты и прочий низший венский состав без высшего военного образования, так что с чего вы взяли что какой то сержант который полетал 3 года и стал квалифицированней капитана или майора который летает около 10 лет и боьше

Wonder what the maintenance per hours of flight is

Apaches did not participate in the aggression against Serbia and Srna Gora in 1999, because they would have ended up like the invisible F-117 in the mud.

Apache won in propaganda and k52 just is the nightmare Otan in Ukraine

@miguelalaniz8303

10 ай бұрын

you're 100% correct in fact the K-52 is far superior to the Apache in all aspects . in conclusion the Apache could never be compared to the K-52 any expert on attack helicopters will confirm it

Theres some up and down between these choppers, the pilot on the k-52 can control the guns and shoot like a jet. Now the apache can only fire the guns by the second seater only which sucks ass now inmagine there is only one person in each of these choppers and go at it in close range dog fight who will win? The k-52 will win.

@user-vb1jl6og6b

11 ай бұрын

Все системы управления огнём дублируются у обоих пилотов

There is no way Apache can compete with Alligator in the field. Syria region has proven both performances.

What can you get wrapped up in those blades that would be strong enough to rip them apart maybe steel webs or titanium wires

Basically, the Apache only has experience of fighting third-world rebels, on low-intensity battlefields, without modern AA systems. If the tail is hit, the pilot has no chance of survival

@ghakon684

10 ай бұрын

У повстанцев было много пзрк, а армия Ирака имела лучшую систему ПВО на Ближнем Востоке. Тактика американцев: подавить системы пво противника, и спокойно летать, это позволяет огромное количество авиации и ракет в арсенале

KA is a war machine Apache is a fancy toy.

@dew7025

4 ай бұрын

apache is used in combat against t72s and russian equipment to great effect

@dew7025

4 ай бұрын

the fire and forget hellfires are way better than the russian missiles you can hide after firing

What are the pro's and cons for haveing the pilots sit next to eatch other or have them front and back like the Apache.

Tienen aire acondicionado y radio con bluetooth?

Ka-52 is at war with Zu-23-4, Gepard, Arrow, Stinger and so on AH-64 is fighting with dudes with AK47, whose air defense is a DShK attached to a donkey.🤣🤣🤣

@PredatorPeyami

10 ай бұрын

and ka-52 still successful against those threats.

I'm old. I remember the old Microprose Apache sim / game in the 90's. I remember "Ultimate" difficulty. That is what thw KA-52 is currently doing in Ukraine, with strong results and easily replaceable / tolerable losses, every single mission.

@tn-titan6159

11 ай бұрын

I wonder how many Russian troops will surrender and cry on camera today? Lol

@sandorkovacs4078

11 ай бұрын

​@@tn-titan6159Nem csak kíváncsi vagy, de marhaságokat is beszélsz.

As a retired CW3, I firmly believe that the Apache has an upper hand since the U.S. does not own or operate the KA-52. However, if we hypothesize a scenario where the U.S. operates the KA-52, and the two helicopters go head-to-head with U.S. pilots, I predict a 50-50 outcome in terms of aerial engagements. The KA-52 is indeed a formidable machine. Yet, lessons from the Ukrainian conflict with Russia underscore that efficacy in warfare is not solely reliant on sophisticated machinery. It’s equally, if not more, dependent on a well-trained military force.

I can feel these 2 helicopter is being compared by the comments and i am all for it.

One fundamental issue is coaxial rotary systems take a lot of maintenance. The gear boxes are complex and prone to ware.

@m_zbrv3967

10 ай бұрын

not an issue if they have the maintenance industry.

@paulbradshaw4511

10 ай бұрын

wear

@gokhanylmaz8514

9 ай бұрын

lol complex gearbox? the ka52 has a turboshaft engine, it does not need gearboxes.

I think KA52 top speed is up to 400km/h, not 315.

@IskanderDoublehorn

9 ай бұрын

КА-52 может при необходимости заменять на поле боя даже СУ-25

The Apache has been upgraded five times. Mean SOBs. And pilot skills matter. The KA-52 is much newer. The ability to look and fire is awesome. But that KH-52 is superior head to head if they know how to fight.

Скороподъемность? Бронирование? Посадка пилотов? Маневренность?

The K 52 is flying without his fuĺl tail Look at the Videos. The Ukraine/Nato Offensiv is going on now 14 Days. No one Aircraft or Helicopter is shoot down in this 14 Days. The Ukraine has the most density of anti aircraft Technologie in the World. The mistake is, the Ukraine has US and Nato Anti Aircraft Technologie 😂 thats good for donkys or slipperfighters

You shoot the tail of the Apache and the chopper is down, this is its biggest drawdown; that's the advantage of the KA-52.

@klaabu99

10 ай бұрын

after u shot off ka-52 tail ... with second shot u take out helicopter itself ... that is problem with higher altitudes ... but in ukraine apache would work better .. i mean for russian side ... russia use ka-52 in apache role for couple of month now ... fly on low altitudes and hide behind forest ... probably that is reason why there is a bit higher losses in last 2 month

@badisdahmane761

10 ай бұрын

@@klaabu99 I disagree with the statement, there is one strong reason behind the fly of the Ka-52s behind forests and specifically at night times. Ukraine is the country that received the highest number of portable anti-aircraft missiles, as a matter of fact, because of this it was ranked number one, it received thousands of Stingers and Javelins from Nato Countries, although most of them were sold in black markets.

Корректно сравнивать апач с ми-28 а не с к-52

how great is bradley on the desert battlefield, but why on the ukraine battlefield is bradley so easy to destroy😁😁😁😁

@OLEG-gt2yt

11 ай бұрын

It's all about the shoes. The Russians are shod in army and tactical boots, they don't have rubber flip-flops like the rebels in the desert.😉😉😉😊😊😊

@THEREareTWoGENDERS2

11 ай бұрын

​@@OLEG-gt2ytspeaking of shoes. Russian military can't even afford Boots for their men anymore. Lol.

@THEREareTWoGENDERS2

11 ай бұрын

I wonder how many more Russians will surrender and cry on TV today... Lol

@sandorkovacs4078

11 ай бұрын

Mert Ka-52 vadászik rájuk. Nincs esélyük.

@rangogrc

10 ай бұрын

its true they have hipersonic shovels.....

the Apache helicopter fought war against who? against shepherds in Afghanistan and Iraq?

@Khalid_Looby

6 ай бұрын

yes. meanwhila ka52 fought against mightest nato weapons and leopard 2 and shit lol and won

I've seen other videos about this helicopters and numbers are way different on other videos.

Boy, the Russians sure love their contra rotating propellers/rotors and they’re good at it!

Only the KA has proven to fly without a tail rotor.

Pilot skill and training is a huge detail as well

Both can get upgrades, sensors, better weapons...etc...but I prefer the KA52. So far, those who test their equipment in real combat against equal adversary, know better how to...

Ka52 is the most advanced military helicopter in the world only one with an ejection seat for pilots an is heavily armored against small arms the ah64 was a good solid foundation in the 80s but is showing its age yea they upgraded the digital aspects but still an late 70s design

@hztn

Жыл бұрын

- It doesnt have ejection seats - show me it's works at least at one in-fly video.

@joshuaalistair3193

11 ай бұрын

The ejection seat is mostly irrelevant. Also, the AH-64 is not showing its age. Those upgrades you spoke of mean the airframe may LOOK like the same bird, but the capabilities are totally different.

@hztn

11 ай бұрын

@@prestallar4339 - Couple days ago there was published just a ruining of a Ka-52 in air. Caused not by hit, but just by malfunction by dropping the external fuel tanks, ahahah. "Advanced helicopter", lol.

@TrevorSachko

11 ай бұрын

katsap butt licker. The 52 is junk as evidenced by its performance...

@stefanstecyk8725

11 ай бұрын

Junk.

the one interesting thing about this helicopter is that it shows how russian military tactics are changing from soviet tactics This is like comparing SU-35M with F22, while both aircrafts are great F22 is on another level, the same situation is with Russian KA-52 that helicopter is just on another level

@bartuutgrunn622

11 ай бұрын

The F22. combat proven when shot a weatherbaloon

@tn-titan6159

11 ай бұрын

The alligator is a rip off Apache.

@user-vb1jl6og6b

11 ай бұрын

​@@tn-titan6159вобще обсалютно 2 разные системы

@sandorkovacs4078

11 ай бұрын

Igen, a Ka-52 magasabb szinten van.

07:11 - it's GRYAZEV-Shipunov cannon, (GSh 2А42). They worked together since always.

who has the apache gone up against? Iraqi forces after their military was almost destroyed in the 1990's, or against the Afghans with AK47's and RPG's? (no Stingers as i doubt the USA would have kept supplying them because then the USA changed their allience)

Apache's upgraded sensor suites, avionics, power plant, rotor improvements and ordinance loadouts are what keep it a valid platform after 40 years. The sensor mast above the rotors allows it to "peek" over trees or ridgelines with advanced optics and night vision while maintaining cover from enemy view and fire. It can recon the battle area, pick and lock targets, "pop up" to launch weapons, then take cover again. It is not, however a direct competitor to the KA-52.

@VavanNumber1

10 ай бұрын

Никто не заглядывает из-за деревьев в современной войне - это смерть для вертолета. Спасением для вертолета является скорость и маневренность, а в прячущийся за деревьями вертолет прилетит все что угодно - граната, противотанковая ракета, пули из АК (смертельно опасно для небронированного Апача)

@VavanNumber1

10 ай бұрын

No one peeks through the trees in modern warfare - that's death for a helicopter. Salvation for a helicopter is speed and maneuverability, and anything will fly into a helicopter hiding behind trees - a grenade, an anti-tank missile, AK bullets (deadly dangerous for an unarmored Apache)

@GegeDxD

10 ай бұрын

Can't even be comparable to KA 52

@ghakon684

10 ай бұрын

​@@GegeDxDCan be

@user-jq2mg3oz7k

10 ай бұрын

Апач со всеми наворотами говна стоит и рядом не валялся да же со старым ка52 , а про новый и говорить не стоит …