5:05 - "...or thinking of other things you need to get done instead of fully paying attention to this lesson..." I feel called out.

@commpadresmedia302

4 жыл бұрын

@camwoodstock - At least you were paying enough attention to hear that part of the video! Passive learning still counts as learning.

@trebajordan3544

3 жыл бұрын

A year later and I was thinking the same thing lol

Thanks for a professional put together and executed and easy to understand. Bravo.

I really find this video so helpful, thank you!

I’d label the defined context atmosphere, context usually describing knowledge of communicator and receiver, such as a teenager has a completely different context than an engineer, good communication recognizes the differences.

Don't forget that silence is a way of communication too.

@kanavkohli794

5 жыл бұрын

no

I’d probably say that interaction communication describes it best, (the communication between a speaker and audience), unless u want to have an open conversation

I'm not sure about this assignment and if we post references or wear do I get them from? can anyone give me feedback on this as I am unable to log into the learning center?

Best comparison

thanks for this video, really helpful for my assignment:)

@commpadresmedia302

4 жыл бұрын

Glad it was helpful!

Thanks for helping me understand this better than my actual professor in which i pay hundreds of dollars for :) college is a scam

@commpadresmedia302

4 жыл бұрын

Sometimes hearing information in a different way is all that it takes to achieve understanding. We hope that your college experience has improved!

@ailabarraquias7963

3 жыл бұрын

@@commpadresmedia302 I have some questions what is similiraties and different of the three communication?

If we can get to the point, it would be nice.

👌👌👌👌

By the time this video is finished, I got a heachache and forgot my middle name!

I guess yhe interaction M is the best choice to communicate with your audience . Is that right plz answer meeee

I bliv its interaction communication bcos when d speaker is done deliverin his message he entertains feedback and listens before respondin

thanks for the video friend can you help me with cross-sectional communication please?

@commpadresmedia302

3 жыл бұрын

It's out pleasure! We're so glad that you found it helpful.

A volleyball game maybe

What about audience analysis

@commpadresmedia302

4 жыл бұрын

Nigel - For more information on audience analysis, check out our video at kzread.info/dash/bejne/epqpx5mlXbrbepc.html.

So who proposes the model I mean the name of the scholar

@LeeWallaceIDLA

5 жыл бұрын

Shannon and Weaver in 1948 published the linear model (called the action model in this video), Shramm's theories are probably closest to the transactional model. You really need to consolidate several individual theories to get the big picture. This video is an undergraduate view of communication theory - the same as taught in the basic communication or basic public speaking classes for college freshman or high school seniors. www.communicationtheory.org/list-of-theories/ is a good place to start if you are truly interested in COMM Theory.

@allthatchas

5 жыл бұрын

Usually, the transactional model is ascribed to Paul Watzlawick et al. (1967), Pragmatics of Human Communication. Actually, I am not overly enthousiastic about its portrayal in this video. In the transactional model, the persons who are communicating are central, not the message.kzread.info/dash/bejne/gWGDj8iPZdS6XZM.html is a pretty good alternative.

Sum1 make a summary of this video cus i have a 250 word essay due for it

None. Understanding is duplication. If communication can achieve duplication then it has been succesful. Compatibility of belief system determines whether message is accepted or not.

@commpadresmedia302

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the comment, Martin! I agree that belief systems and other cultural factors absolutely do play an enormous role in communication. However, I would argue that duplication is not necessarily indicative of successful communication. Strictly speaking, I could repeat something that you said back to you and still not have any understanding of what those words actually mean. That's what we would call "parroting," based on the ability of those birds to do just that. I understand where you're coming from, but our stance would be that true understanding in a successful communication scenario requires more than simple duplication. Thanks for contributing to the conversation!

@mkschreder

3 жыл бұрын

@@commpadresmedia302 But then you haven't duplicated it fully. Full duplication becomes understanding. It means you have a copy. Not understanding some words means you have only the topmost slice of that topmost layer.

Dont give examples. Please just stay focus on the topic its over and make confusion