You had me at "Never work from home," but your thoughts about the 28-70 really caught my attention. I'm navigating a slow migration from EF to RF glass. I still have EF bodies as well as an R5, so my migration strategy is to go for RF glass that does something different from my EF lenses. The 28-70 might just be the ticket. BTW, I have an RF 50mm f/1.8. Nice improvement over the EF versions of the lens and I had no expectation of it being L-series quality. Great value-for-money and it gives me a good lightweight lens for gimbal use, hiking, and travel (eventually).

Oh, Vanessa! you compare two 50 mm lenses and in the end you recommend the "Brocken" 28-70 f2.0 - now I really can't wait until my 28-70 f2.0 is finally delivered to Berlin and my EOS R5!

Love the 50 1.2 super lens! Got the trinity as I prefer the RF24-70 over the 28-70 for the weight plus that 24 which I have used a lot over the years on previous 24-70’s, and when I need a low light or bokeh beast that 50 always delivers 👌🏻 Obviously you can’t go wrong with the 28-70 either!

That intro!! 😂

@VanessaJoy

3 жыл бұрын

Lol took me a minute

I love the authenticity and humour in your videos. I feel it helps us to connect to you easily

@VanessaJoy

3 жыл бұрын

Oh good 😅

If anyone is trying to figure out what action to put on their control ring, I would suggest exposure compensation. Especially if you shoot in situations where the light changes a lot. I have mine set to exp comp but to where I have to half press my shutter button before it will change. That makes it to where it’s harder to accidentally change things.

I'm actually a beginner following your videos, what I feel is impressed and plain. Hopefully it will still exist. Greetings from Indonesia!

@VanessaJoy

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks for being here 🙏

Thank you for this video and especially for your comments at the end about the amazing 28-70 that I already own. It made me realize I don’t need a 50mm for what I do.

@VanessaJoy

3 жыл бұрын

Glad you liked!

I have the 1.2, how does the RF 28-70mm f2 compares to the 50 1.2? Not just sharpness, but character, rendering, colors?

I found your digression to the 28-70 very relevant and certainly appreciate the honesty and I agree with you on many levels.

what camera you use to do this video? thanks!!!

Agree the 28-70mm f/2.0 is a real winner. Love primes, but will wait for the 3.rd party to catch up with RF choices before investing the big money. Meanwhile 50mm RF 1.8 and my remaining 35mm L II serve me well when I want either brighter or lighter.

Thanks for the great video. Always good insights. And thank you so much for using Photo Mechanic lol I don't see it a lot outside of the newsie world and I can't understand why.

Thanks for the video, i enjoyed watching.

I really like how you kept all of the outtakes in the video! I made this video a 10/10!!! :)

@VanessaJoy

3 жыл бұрын

Aw thanks! Lol it was so frustrating

@vieuxsviewsphotography

3 жыл бұрын

@@VanessaJoy All content creators know the struggle 😂

I have the RF 1.8 lens. While it’s definitely not at the 1.2 level, for the money, it is very good. Wide open isn’t as good as it could be, but by 2.8 most of the issues are gone, and by 4-5.6 it’s shockingly good. Of course, if you prefer to shoot wide open, the 1.2 is the better lens.

@VanessaJoy

3 жыл бұрын

Good assessment:)

Love your comments on the 28-70 mm lens. Not sure which way for me to turn, due to the EF/ RF mount changes I have 16-35mm f4.0 L, 50mm f1.4, Rf 85mm f2.0 and in my further changes over to RF looking at a Rf mount 28-70mm L as you explained today, or the Rf 135mm f2.0 L when it comes out in 2021. I mainly like street/ beach photographs. I could almost say I have the mid range focal length primes covered, but I should transition more to L lens because those Rf mounts are delicious. So, my next purchase is important to take me into 2022.

@VanessaJoy

3 жыл бұрын

They ARE delicious

Hi Vanessa, I liked your video and i want to ask what color profile are you using for your videos? and if you can share the camera settings. Thank you

I own an ef 50 1.4, I was looking forward to the Rf 50 1.8, but as far as I look at the reviews, it's best to leave the Ef version. I was expecting more than 1.8 RF versions. 1.2 is out of my budget. Thanks Vanessa.

@anoddviewcreative505

Жыл бұрын

I also am sticking with my 50mm 1.4 EF which does a fantastic job in low light, even better paired with the R6. Much better things to spend on.

I have the RF 28-70 paired with the RF 50 1.8 - best combo for versatility and less obtrusive /lightweight shooting.

@VanessaJoy

3 жыл бұрын

Good call

Old video but it just popped up! Question, do you find a benefit to adjusting white balance in camera with the control ring rather than doing it in post with the raw files? You must since that’s what you say but I’ve never done it. Just curious what the benefit would be unless it’s just to have images ready to go straight out of camera. Thanks!

@VanessaJoy

Жыл бұрын

I do same day edits with jpgs so I do sometimes like dialing in my WB manually ☺️

Thanks V, really struggling with the whole 50mm 1.2/28-70mm 2/24-70mm 2.8 thing, really appreciate you just coming out with your favourite!

@VanessaJoy

Жыл бұрын

Got a whole video coming out on my fav soon!

Just found you on KZread and am really enjoying your content! When shooting with your 50mm, do you find yourself on auto ISO or do you set it for each shot?

@VanessaJoy

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks so much! I set it for each shot :)

Omg I love this video, I relate so much to the work from home part.

Thanks for another awesome video, is the 28-70mm f2 as good at 50mm comparing to the 50mm at f2?

@VanessaJoy

3 жыл бұрын

I can’t say I’ve compared the two. But any difference would be negligible when you consider how much more convenience and range you’re getting out of the 28-70

Hi Vanessa. How did you find a focus speed? I am thinking to order this as a backup for my RF24-70 for weddings. Would it be able to shoot a wedding on it if my main fails?

@trmbtrmb

2 жыл бұрын

I have the 1.8 and It misses focus for me too much. If the subject is moving it can be difficult.

A 50 mm 1.2 is really s specialty lens. Traditionally a 50 mm lens is cheap, small and easy to replace. That is sort of the point of most 50 mm lenses. Using an extremely expensive 50 mm is possible but really: absolute image quality was never the purpose of a 50 mm slr lens. Being portable, staying out of sight, not risking getting robbed due to walking around with something expensive etc etc. all these aspects weigh heavily on when buying glass at that focal length. I own both lenses and the 1.8 is a much safer bet in an everyday environment. Thanks for the video!

Not watched the video yet (paused), had to stop, sub and comment first. Brilliant intro, I absolutely loved your humour!

@VanessaJoy

3 жыл бұрын

Lol glad you like

Yep good video. Thanks. One thing I'd like to point out that is often missed in reviews, is a lot depends on the situation. For instance, if you are doing a shoot indoors, then you would probably choose a 50mm or even 35mm over a trinity lens as most of your work would be at the same distance where at if you were doing a wedding shoot you would want the flexibility of a zoom. As for the 1.8vs 1.2, choose the 1.8 if you have a plain backdrop which you would not be shooting with bokeh in mind and then 1.2 for those shots that would have bokeh. It would def be interesting to see a video on this, and which lens you would use for which situation. Now to watch some more of your videos!

Hey 1 question You mention your glasses having a blue light filter and that it's not good for editing. Is that the same filter that goes into glasses for computer use and if so could you expand on the comment or make a video? I wear glasses and work on a computer for my day job and they have a filter in them to cut down on glare, etc. So wondering if it's the same thing and if I need a set of glasses just for phot editing. I hope this makes sense.

@VanessaJoy

3 жыл бұрын

It does change the coloring slightly (looks warmer since it’s taking out the blue). It’s slight but I did notice!

@JB-rm1oc

3 жыл бұрын

@@VanessaJoy Thanks a bunch

Great video. There is always so much glass to choose from yet we almost always have our favourites to go lenses. Thank you for leaving the earlier takes in the video. They made me smile and laugh. It nice to see kids around the world leaving their mark on the world.

@VanessaJoy

3 жыл бұрын

Glad you like 👍

I just picked up the RF 50 1.8, it is tiny. I’ll only use it a handful of days a year so couldn’t justify buying the 1.2 or the 28-70 but I want that zoom.

@VanessaJoy

3 жыл бұрын

There ya go

Great video!

@VanessaJoy

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching

I’ve been preferring primes lately and just like the feel of the faster lenses and the confidence they inspire. The outtakes at the beginning just added to my perception that your personality is a great blend of fun and serious. I enjoy watching.

Vanessa rocks ! Thanks for comparing these two.

@VanessaJoy

3 жыл бұрын

My pleasure ☺️

Great video. Im glad you ended with the 28-70mm. I have the rf 85mm 1.2. I was debating between 50mm 1.2 and 28-70mm for my next lens. I decided to go with 28-70mm. To prevent myself from getting the 1.2, I got the 50mm 1.8. Haha. Although 50mm 1.2 is amazing, it's not worth the money with some of the flaws. Also, on 50mm I rarely use 1.2 on a wedding day. Great video.

@VanessaJoy

Жыл бұрын

Thanks 😊 I mean I love them all…. But when you literally have them ALL in your hands with ONE lens. How do you beat that?

@116Paul

Жыл бұрын

@@VanessaJoy you can't. Haha. Some of the other youtubers said it's heavy, but if Vanessa could carry the lens you can. So suck it up. Haha. Thanks for all the great videos.

Maybe the blur on the eyes at lens f1.8 is also due to the exposure time not too short 1/100?

@VanessaJoy

3 жыл бұрын

No I was steady and it has IS :)

👉🏼 I clicked on the like just because of your reactions to all the interruptions. Pretty funny! The exact same thing happens to my recordings. I keep forgetting that what I hear doesn't correlate to what the mic picks up or not. If I just ignore the little sounds and keep going, I can get through the shot in one or two takes. But be being the perfectionist, I just yell cut and start over again. Next time, I'll just keep going like you did and leave it all in because not only is it funny, but it's real life. 🤣

@VanessaJoy

3 жыл бұрын

Lol definitely real life

LOL I got a kick from your opening few minutes on your video. The Blonde Bridal subject has a gorgeous pair of baby blue eyes. When I shoot indoor informal portraits I love my Nikon 24-70 2.8 also but if I'm outdoors or a BIG indoor room I will break out my Nikon 105 1.4 lens :-) That puppy weighs a lot more than my 24-70. Nice video Vanessa.

Just one of those days, hey!!! :D But, you got through it :D 1.2 is good for those low light situations and that's what I'd buy a lens that fast for. Not so much for the bokeh but for the fact that you're not going to always have that great light to shoot with. Or, even want or need to shoot in such a situation. But, one thing you do know, now. And, that is you have several alternatives for using lead weights to do your bicep curls!!! :D :P :P

Haha, you're hilarious! I'm pretty sure I could tell the difference (the 1.8 probably isn't $2000 worse, though) and most people probably wouldn't notice and sometimes that is what matters, most people don't care about your gear, just that you can make good photos of them, I do these comparisons a fair bit and that is how I ended io with the EF 85mm f1.4 IS over the EF 85mm f1.2, I'm not sure I could tell the difference unless the images were side by side. The 28-70mm f2 is such a useful range that almost covers 3 of the most useful primes and who would argue with anyone that can hold that bad boy up all day, anyway! :D

Great point. I still love using my 55mm 1.8 and it pretty much lives on my camera. But I get having the flexibility of the 28-70. Loved the intro by the way

I wish nikon would make the 28-70mm F2. I won't switch to Canon though.

I got the 50 1.8 first hoping for a light weight lens that could be held one hand with flash off camera with other hand. But I ended up going to the 24-70 f2.8 for the flexibility of range without shifting. But the real challenge with the 50 was the noise when focusing, even when just holding down the BF button while taking shot. I also like to be able to seamlessly shift into video mode and then back to stills. The 50 just seems too noisy for video if you are using camera mic.

@VanessaJoy

6 ай бұрын

Yes video is another world for sure ☺️

If I have enough budget to buy 28-70 f2 then I will pick RF 24-70 f2.8 IS, to me having IS will be the huge advance even shooting on R6.

@VanessaJoy

2 жыл бұрын

sounds like you know the right tool for you :-)

Thank you very much for this one, it is VERY HELPFUL (not so helpful to my wallet, because now I will definitely be going 28-70 f/2). You said you don't go down to 1.2 on the 50mm, do you should the 28-70 at f/2?

@VanessaJoy

3 жыл бұрын

I definitely go to f2 on that lens. And I do love when I shoot with the 50 1.2 at 1.2, but practicality and weight-wise I’m typically using the 28-70

TOP 5 REASONS WHY I WATCH VANESSA JOY: 5) I get things that help me in photography and I don't feel like I'm sitting in a classroom or watching an "instructional" video. 4) The videos are just plain fun to watch. 3) You don't elevate yourself above other photographers. It's more like "I'm not the best in the world, but I'm pretty good at what I do and I think I can help you." 2) Since watching your videos, I don't feel like a complete idiot when I make mistakes AND REASON #1: It makes me smile in this time of doom and gloom that surrounds us! I hope you don't forget us when all of this health and political upheaval comes to an end! We'll still be looking for your videos!

@VanessaJoy

3 жыл бұрын

This means so much to me. So happy you’re liking everything and took the time to tell me!!

Awesome. Now to look up 28 70 f2 videos:)

@VanessaJoy

3 жыл бұрын

Got one for ya right here: kzread.info/dash/bejne/jIiLlpaOn62ZeJM.html

My head was spinning at the end of the video.

@vanessa joy How can you compare the two lenses using two different cameras? You need to stick with one camera only or results are clearly obvious.

@VanessaJoy

3 жыл бұрын

Didn’t have a choice. I have to use the r6 with the 1.8 BUT the fact that I was using a “lower level” camera just proves my point more

@ontheroad_8132

3 жыл бұрын

@@VanessaJoy The 1.8 suits better the lower resolution sensor of the R6 and unless you would have compared the 1.2 on the R6 as well, you could have then prove the differences between the two. Althought there is a massive price gap (and build quality) between the two lenses, the 1.8 covers over 90% of the benefits of the heavy and expensive 1.2.

@VanessaJoy

3 жыл бұрын

@@ontheroad_8132 sure, but since I’m all about actual use case I showed it and talked about it how I actually used it 😉 no desire to be a full blown camera/lens reviewer (boooooring to me)

Would you say the 1.2 is better for studio work?

@VanessaJoy

3 жыл бұрын

Sure, but depends on how you shoot too. If you’re usually hovering around f/4-f/8, don’t back light a lot, focusing without a problem bc there’s good light, etc then you might be fine with the 1.8

@danbrowning2418

3 жыл бұрын

@@VanessaJoy Good points.

While I am not a working photographer, I feel your pain in trying to work from home. Love the into......🤣🤣🤣🥳🥳🥳

@VanessaJoy

3 жыл бұрын

Haha glad you feel me!

Thank you for your honest real word opinions on good glass. I love your perspective. Since you talked about great glass why don't you get new glasses.

@VanessaJoy

3 жыл бұрын

Lol these are just the blue light ones. I’m not a fan so I won’t be buying more

Oh Joy joy haven’t seen this one yet! Even though it’s old

Hmmmm 28-70 f2 But the RF50 1.2 is my go to! I'm starting to pick up the RF85 1.2 more though... I don't want to have expensive glass laying around that I don't use. That's my fear.

@HungNguyen-yg6dq

3 жыл бұрын

So you rather use the rf50 than the rf28-70?

@VanessaJoy

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah that’s no bueno. I use my 50 still, but when I’m packing for a job and I need to lug my gear around, I’ll take the 28-70 any day.

@ShawnLPorterPhotography

3 жыл бұрын

@@HungNguyen-yg6dq I don't own the RF28-70, It sound tempting though. LOL

@HungNguyen-yg6dq

3 жыл бұрын

@@ShawnLPorterPhotography i am also on the same boat as you!

Who else was crying before the 1:30 mark OMG, I literally snot cola out of my nose when you started hitting yourself with the lens :) "DO NOT WORK FROM HOME" LOLOLOL

@VanessaJoy

3 жыл бұрын

Lol

If you've put the 1.8 on the r5 and the 1.2 on the r6 the sharpness would be much better on the 1.8 just because of the dubbel mp

@VanessaJoy

Жыл бұрын

I didn’t have control over what camera I used 🤷🏻‍♀️ I would’ve loved to do a side by side for sure!

Ur bangs are BANGING ! (SEE WHAT I DID THERE) haha good video

@VanessaJoy

2 жыл бұрын

I love a good pun

Great advice while I love the 50mm L my budget allows only one $2500+ lens . The. 28-70mm is the best option for me. Great comparison thanks

@VanessaJoy

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks for sharing!

Short summary: RF50 f1.2 or RF50 f1.8? RF28-70 f2 of course! 🤣 Jokes aside, nice vid Vanessa! 👍🏻😊

@VanessaJoy

3 жыл бұрын

Hehe pretty much. Hey, I gotta be honest with what I’m doing lately!

Best first 30 seconds of a video I've ever seen.

@VanessaJoy

2 жыл бұрын

😂 thanks for enjoying my pain

Also, you have a video titled "Why I Use A 50mm For Everything" but in this video you say you rarely use the 50mm f/1.2. Is that something that changed since the 28-70 f/2 came out?

@VanessaJoy

3 жыл бұрын

Exactly

If you want F1.2, get the 85mm. If you want 50mm, get the F1.8

As a Dad, I remember the "loving chaos" of the early years! Thanks for the video and your insights! Always appreciated :)

I have the 1.2 and it’s my most used and favorite lens. But when I was still using Canon’s DSLRs, I had the EF equivalent of the RF 1.8. If you’re starting out or want to use your resources elsewhere, the 1.8 performs far beyond its price point. The 1.2 is better of course, but most clients will never know the difference. DO NOT cheap out on your 70-200 by getting the f/4. This one, you can go cheap out on if needed.

@VanessaJoy

8 ай бұрын

👏

i like the summary. the 50mm 1.2 is a specialised lens, perfect for a shot or two but expensive for little use for the majority of us. the 50 1.8 is cheap enough that u can put it in the bag and its there if u need it. the 28-70 or the 24-70 is the better overall and most flexible choice. your very funny too, i like the comments at the start. and during when u ad lib.

Glass pane doors...Don't work from home. Ha! Great intro.

@VanessaJoy

3 жыл бұрын

Lol thx

Yay, you got through the video.

@VanessaJoy

3 жыл бұрын

Lol I was concerned about that

Love the out takes and the practical take on the lens options.

I have the 28-70 f2 and was considering picking up the 50 1.2 just for the f1.2. You have just convinced me to NOT get the 50 1.2 and appreciate my 28-70 more! Haha

hi, i think we have become pen pals Vanessa. you have made videos talking about the 50mm in the past and i have commented often. i want to say that the 50mm 1.2 would make a great but expensive addition to your weight room lol. i have mostly photographed weddings with the 50mm 1.8 and no complaints just applause for my work. i now have upgraded to the 1.4 and sorry to say have no work. however if i shot at f4 sharpness is the same for the 1.2, 1.4, 1.8 i am thinking most people here are new and i would say start with the 50mm 1.8,1.4, i know no one is asking me what i think ;} i am still giving u a like ;}

@VanessaJoy

3 жыл бұрын

I think the RF 1.8 is PERFECT for people starting out. It’s a quality lens for sure

@cosmo0080

3 жыл бұрын

@@VanessaJoy i agree photographed so may wedding with it ;}

There's a better comparison, when you walk in the B&H store in Manhattan and see these two lenses on a shelf side-by-side with the price tags below each of them. The one with red ring is $2100.00 the other, smaller one $120.00

@VanessaJoy

Жыл бұрын

Price diff is HUGE!

I find ZOOM lenses hinder my creative. I prefer to lock myself into a prime and eliminate that composition variable. ZOOMs provide too many choices when other factors are involved. In other words.. when I want a 50mm perspective, i put on the prime and start shooting. Keep in mind, i do mostly fashion, headshots, and families,... when I do weddings, i need my 28-70 to capture fleeting spontaneous moments (i.e. my fingers are faster than my legs at zooming). All this to say, using a ZOOM messes with my mental focus and creative agenda by allowing me to too easily slip into a alternative perspective... me not likey.

@VanessaJoy

2 жыл бұрын

That’s definitely a valid and interesting perspective. I used to think the same thing actually

Education and humor 🙌🏼😂

@VanessaJoy

3 жыл бұрын

gotta try right?

I’d like to see the rf 85mm f2 vs the rf 28-70mm f2 in quality. Same maximum aperture, more compression, and 1/5 of the price.

You looking gorgeous 😘😘

What a chaotic 'review'. :-) But in the end there is some wisdom. But not enough: of course you can and do buy the 1.8 50mm for several reasons even if you have and perhaps because you have a 28-70 2.0. Weight and safety reasons of course in some situations and locations. chaotic review in short. 🙂

The 1.2 would be awesome but that thing costs more than the EOS R that i’m getting 🤦🏻‍♂️ i’d have to take out a loan for ONE LENS lmao.

@lepidoptera9337

2 жыл бұрын

If you are making money with photography, then you can deduct it, anyway. If you are not, then it's "just" a hobby and I do know people who are running around with $13k telephoto lenses for their birding hobby... Would I personally spend a year's worth of rent on a single lens to see the reflection of the photographer in the sparrow's eye? Probably not, but if you have the spare cash sitting around anyway...

“Never work from home” 😂

@VanessaJoy

3 жыл бұрын

😂

I have the 1.8 and can confidently say you jacked up those pics in the cheaper lens on purpose. I get way better image quality out of mine than you showed in this video.

@VanessaJoy

3 жыл бұрын

Um no. That’s literally the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard.

@benjaminmesa1089

3 жыл бұрын

XD I was kinda thinking the same! I love the regular 'ol 1.8.

@benjaminmesa1089

3 жыл бұрын

She lit the one with the 1.8 really strongly and then expects it to not try and soak up all the light coming into it, which is like asking an owl to enjoy the afternoon sun.

@blackmenace20051

3 жыл бұрын

@@VanessaJoy lol ok

@blackmenace20051

3 жыл бұрын

@@benjaminmesa1089 😂

This is deffo not a good video to watch for comparison as one lense is being shot on a r6 with 20 mega pixels vs a r5 with nearly 50 mega Pixels

@kylestauffer6228

3 жыл бұрын

You can tell the difference of megapixels watching in 1080p? haha

@RonEMarks

2 жыл бұрын

@@kylestauffer6228 We don't have too see the difference inour screens. Vanessa said she saw a difference when she cropped in.

Love u videos and work , but very muddled review

I really love how candid this video was Vanessa. It shows some of the struggles you have to deal with when working from home. Great comparison too.

@VanessaJoy

3 жыл бұрын

Happy to hear it ☺️

Hello Vanessa oui mais c'est du matos pour pro rare de nos jours les amateurs qui achètent des objectifs a 1500 voir 2000 euro.

You are comparing two different lenses using two different cameras with two different models in different lighting conditions. While I appreciate your efforts and I really appreciate the free videos, this one is not helpful in comparing the lenses, but it was very entertaining ;)

@marcel9568

2 жыл бұрын

Totally agree. Worthless comparisons.

I second the "never work from home" sentiment. It's awesome when it works alright, but most of the time it doesn't and is horrendeous.

@VanessaJoy

2 жыл бұрын

😂

Where do you get this energy from? Every day, you do a new thing, post a video, hold a class, photograph a wedding, and ..... OMG

@VanessaJoy

3 жыл бұрын

Lol I have work-life balance issues

I'm now $2,999 less wealthy. Thank you for that and as always for the clutch reviews

@VanessaJoy

3 жыл бұрын

Haha so sorry

lol everyone who has kids, knows that feeling 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

@VanessaJoy

3 жыл бұрын

Yup!

such a content gtb 4k

Fstop is overrated just as 4k...sony and canon especially rf L series overcharging. Why spend over 2k-3k for one lens one year warranty maybe no is when you can get similar exact lens half the cost. I think tamron and sigma budget pro lenses are fine better build and better warranties. Slight differences like between 1.8 and 1.4 but big difference in prices. Also keep in mind 28-70f2.0 slight difference from 24-70f2.8 except you losing focal lengths and heavier cost alot more...is it worth to replace 24-70f2.8. No. You can get sigma 24-70f2.8 art hsm art OS less $1k and it has weatherseal and IS unlike others.

Приятная девушка и классный фотограф.

One of those days lol.

@VanessaJoy

3 жыл бұрын

One day ☺️

Nobody has the 28 to 70

So the video was suppose to be about the $200 lens and ends up recommending a $3000 lens. Guys the RF 50/1.8 is an excellent lens for 99% users. As for pro photographers, they know their needs and don’t watch videos to pick a lens. Waste of 11 minutes, sorry Joy

@VanessaJoy

3 жыл бұрын

No I’m not recommending one over the other. Tools are tools and they have to fit budget and use factor. But I do talk about what I personally use at the end, but that doesn’t negate anything about either of the lenses.

@MrPanthers23

3 жыл бұрын

@@VanessaJoy Jeez. The random negativity of viewers can be so insane. Don't let the haters get to you. Thanks for your videos. I personally couldn't help myself and got the 50mm rf 1.8. The size/weight on my R6 is unbeatable. G.A.S. is a real thing though, but im trying hard to resist. Now, when Canon comes out with a 35mm 1.2.... Not sure I can resist that one.

@creativegreats6924

3 жыл бұрын

One life I think is was an excellent video . I wanted to know her opinion and what she prefers over all as far as gear is concerned the 28-70 f2 covers the 50 range so why spend money on a 50mm 1.2 that has limitations . The 50 on the f2 I’m sure creates a wonderful bokeh and you get various focal ranges and if you go in aspc mode with the r5 you get even more length and compression without losing much quality . Now if you dnt have money for the rf 28-70 f2 or 50 1.2 or u dnt plan to use it for professional use and maybe just as a family photo lens than the 50mm 1.8 is an excellent option . She covered this all. Deepen your thinking mane ! add some layers to it ! You know She provides very great well thought out information for all of us through KZread and books etc . So be thankful . Have a blessed day .

LOL, image quality comparison in 1080p

@VanessaJoy

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah well last time I offered people the download of raw images it was more trouble then it was worth 🤷🏻‍♀️

@brokernaples

3 жыл бұрын

​@@VanessaJoy I don't see a download link. The whole purpose of having high end gear is defeated if you reduce it to a cell phone level.

She's getting neurotic about all the noises around her that are "ruining the video" which we viewers can't even hear! 😅😅 Good content!

@VanessaJoy

2 жыл бұрын

Dude, kids are SO ANNOYING. Trucks too 😂

Very too expensive ! 1.8 is a great deal

Wait a minute... You have "compared" 2 lenses on 2 different subjects with 2 different cameras? I liked the video, but we have to talk about the definition of comparing 😂

@VanessaJoy

2 жыл бұрын

I’ll guess you weren’t listening when I explained why that was...

@lepidoptera9337

2 жыл бұрын

@@VanessaJoy The why doesn't really matter. You may as well have made a comparison between landscape and architectural photography. :-)

Would you say the 50 1.8 is the "Nifty 50" of the EF line? haaa. On a side note, I owe you a huge apology. Someday when we cross paths, I will divulge ...

@VanessaJoy

3 жыл бұрын

Why’s that?

@RichardJPhotog

3 жыл бұрын

This isn’t the forum for it. I engaged with you negatively here a year ago. I was wrong. Having watched your educational videos, I’ve earned an utmost respect for you. The fact the insight is free adds remarkable value. I cannot take back what was said, I do however apologize and understand I was wrong.

@VanessaJoy

3 жыл бұрын

@@RichardJPhotog wow. That means a lot to me. Thanks Rich ☺️