Maybe you should compare with the Canon EF 50mm 1.2L too :)

Sorry Tony but that 50mm f/1.4 that you're comparing is not "a fantastic lens", it came out... 25 years ago! Of course it sucks compared to modern lenses. Then you compare it to zooms (which is about as apples and oranges as you can get), a crop sensor lens that isn't close to the same field of view, and nothing else??? Sorry but this review is not up to your usual level of quality and completeness. Why wouldn't you compare it to a modern modern full frame 50mm f/1.4 like Sony's or Sigma's? Sony's resolves 41 perceptual megapixels on the A7Rii according to DxO Mark (which is 97% acuity), Sigma's resolves 40 (95% acuity), Sony's 55 f/1.8 does 40 (95% acuity), and that POS 25 year old Canon only resolves 22 perceptual megapixels on the 5DSR (44% acuity). I know this is a bit tough, but you can't claim this lens produces images that no other lens can without comparing it to it's competition. A f/1.2 lens like this BEGS to be compared to a modern f/1.4 to see what the VERY slightly larger aperture (and MASSIVELY higher price) actually does for you in terms of bokeh but it's not shown here. I still think you're one of the best on KZread, but this looks bad and I can't blame people for complaining because the optics of this video are not good.

@jonathankelly5997

5 жыл бұрын

They have overa million subs - it seems more about getting out another vid out than being accurate or on point...

@reng6688

5 жыл бұрын

+Dennis Kapatos - I agree with everything you said here; however, all KZreadrs need viewers. By revealing the truth too much, fanboys are going to drop their subscriptions on this channel....:)

@robwhitmore3040

5 жыл бұрын

Yeah, I own that lens and the cheaper 1.8. I haven't touched the 1.4 since I got the 1.8 because its so soft wide open that I stop it down narrower than my zooms when I use it. If my 1.8 broke, I'd take my 40mm pancake over the 50 1.4

@changleon7441

5 жыл бұрын

That Ef 1.4 is garbage.... it doesn’t live up to today’s standards, even the focusing motor is not fast enough

@shibui2466

5 жыл бұрын

You guys love to criticize...

Hey Tony great video thanks for the upload. Quick question: I just bought the 50mm f1.4 for a backup. Is it normal that the focusing ring is not that smooth? Feels like paper on paper when turned off cam. Thanks for any ideas/tipps

I've watched all of the big KZreadr's reviews of this lens and this is definitely one of the better ones (along with the Christopher Frost review)... I recently compared this lens to the RF 28-70mm f/2. The 28-70mm has a different character - it is more contrasty and you can shoot at a considerably closer distance (39 cm), which allows you to get more unique angles. But at 50mm at f/2 there is no doubt this lens is sharper and gives far better bokeh. I agonized over buying this 50mm lens because it's so expensive, but I was shooting in a Peerspace that was quite small and I couldn't get the subject/background separation I wanted with the 28-70mm f/2 wide open. This lens is worth the $$ - very unique rendering. As Tony says, you may not see it explicitly, but you can *feel* it in the images.

Tony, Tony, Tony shouldn't we be comparing this lens to similarly priced 50's? This lens should be up against the Zeiss Otus or at least Milvus. I'm not sure why we're putting it up against a lens that costs 10% of what the RF lens costs...

@axiom6947

5 жыл бұрын

Zeiss Otus has not AF. Tony compare it to similar lens.

@mallred4347

5 жыл бұрын

Axiom - We're talking about Optical performance here. Who cares about AF??? Geraint & Julio - I'm talking about the $300 50MM Canon lens when I refer to the lens that only costs 10% of what the RF Lens costs. I know this math is bad - it's closer to 15%, but 10% sounds better in the post.

@architagarwal256

5 жыл бұрын

@@josecolon8143 lol. 10th of something and 10 percent of something is the same. You are joking right? Also, regardless it's an exaggeration so it hardly matters.

@AllCarsUnited

5 жыл бұрын

I laughed when he compared it to the 50 mm 1.4 300 dollar lense when there's a superior EF canon 50mm 1.2

@QuietOC

5 жыл бұрын

It would be interesting to see it compared with the EF 50mm F1.2 L USM and perhaps the EF 50mm F1 L USM.

Need advice unrelated to this video. I need to upgrade to a 4k camera just for youube videos where i am recording myself and for short documentaries. I currently have the GH3. Should I get the A7rii, the GH5 or the A7iii? I can't get the A7sii because the autofocus is not reliable Thanks for your response

is it allowed to mod the lens to for to a different mount type? manual focus will be ok very interesting lens i just wish that for a ultra wide angle lens < 20 mm

The 50 mm "NORMAL" FOV comes from the fact that when you look through the viewfinder with a 50 mm lens, there is no difference in object size compared to looking with the naked eye. You can try this by looking with one eye normally and with the other eye through the viewfinder. Just keep in mind that most lenses have some focus breathing so the actual FOV might not be exactly 50 mm...

@henryD9363

5 жыл бұрын

That's because viewfinder magnification is designed for 50 mm so that the magnification through the viewfinder is the same as viewing with your unaided eye: 1.0X. There's nothing magic about 50 mm, it's a design choice. The viewfinder's magnification could have been set for, say, 35 mm. This choice goes back to film SLRs. Of course, 50 mm is a good all-around focal length.

@djole02

5 жыл бұрын

@Mister Man Yes, my mistake.

@okaro6595

5 жыл бұрын

Not so. From 5D MK IV specs: Viewfinder magnification 0.71x. It is measured with 50 mm. So it is 70 mm on which the image size is same. 50 mm was normal even in the rangefinder era and these did not change the magnification based on lens. Instead the viewfinder had markings for different focal lengths. Leica 1 from 1927 with 50 mm f/3.5 lens upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/95/LEI0060_186_Leica_I_Sn.5193_1927_Originalzustand_Front-2_FS-15.jpg I think the 50 mm was pretty arbitrary choice. One can argue on what the normal exactly is. It is somewhere between 30 and 70 mm.

@okaro6595

5 жыл бұрын

Viewfinder magnification is close to 1 only on crop cameras like EOS 7D Mark II. That is because viewfinder magnification is measured with a 50 mm lens regardless of the sensor size. However, on crop 50 mm is not the normal. In practice the viewfinder image on 7D Mark II is smaller than on 5D Mark II when one uses same equivalent focal length.

@Hubieee

Жыл бұрын

@@henryD9363 na, not true exactly I would say. E.g if you would design it for 200 mm and keep the magnification to scale you would mostly see blackness inside the viewfinder, in contrast with wide angle lenses you would cut off parts of the image…

Someone help, I currently shoot both Sony and Fuji and have discovered that in AF-C both the A7rii and XH-1 don’t keep the aperture open while autofocusing, but instead close down to whatever f stop you set it at. This is vastly different from my Nikon DSLR, that would only stop down as you pressed the shutter. By forcing the lens closed during AF, these bodies switch from PDAF to CDAF (beyond f8) ruining the continuous autofocus tracking. Are there any mirrorless bodies that autofocus the way my Nikon/Canon did or am I out of luck? I shoot planes, and to get prop blur I’m often down at f11 or lower.

On my colour corrected monitor the Canon 50 f1.2 has a yellow cast ?

Question... how do you shoot at f1.2 in bright daylight, with a max shutter speed 1/8000? My 50mm f1.8 I have to fit an ND filter. With my Fujifilm xt3 it auto switches to Electronic up to 1/32,000 - never have an issue. Thanks

Can you compare Zeiss Otus 1.4/55 vs Canon RF 50mm F1.2?

Great video! I watched this when it was new, and it just occurred to me to come back to it. With the new Canon mirrorless cameras now coming with IBIS, does this review change at all? Anyone see the sharpness issue with camera shake that has an opinion on what IBIS does for that? Thanks!

With the rear element being all the way to the back would that mean that lenses are "safer" and less likely to get dust and mould etc in the lens?

hi, did you try this combo with digital IS? thanks

Is the new Panasonic 50mm f1.4 sharper & better bokeh?

A comparison with a 5D mkIV and an EF 50mm f/1.2 would be a good one.

@FarizTGK

5 жыл бұрын

This is sharper edge to edge, and looks very "robotic & digital" ,Jared Polin's words. The ef is more natural and has vigenetting. Dslr vs mirrorless, u know the debate. Note, I have NOT used either of these lenses or cameras this is just my knowledge, feel free to correct me.

@FarizTGK

3 жыл бұрын

@@TimHuhtala Theres just something about having that character in your images, having a prestine, ultra sharp image doesnt carry nearly as much emotion as a softer, more "flawed" lens. It's 4 am so i dont know how to put it best, but i feel like while the RF can be great for model shoots and all that stuff, EF is better for street photography, just an example. You can use either for both purposes, im just saying that certain lenses have more character and produces much more nuanced and unique images that, depending on your preference, can look better. 😄

why you compare canon RF50f/1.2 with EF50f/1.4? and secondly when you compare fuji 56mm f/1.2 with RF 50f/1.2 i saw that your focus with fuji was on the eyebrow and on the other hand your focus with canon was on the eyelash .

How about a comparison with the new Voigtlander 50mm 1.2 M-mount? It's a manual focus lens, but put it on an A7iii with TechArt Pro adapter and it gets autofocus. It's also like 1/3 the size and weight of this lens.

Thank you very much!! Been considering this one vs the older 1.2 or 1.4, so this is extremely helpful. Thank you!!

Tony Northrup - Do you have any experience with the 50mm 1.4 Sony/Zeiss Planar E mount? I've owned one now for a short time and mostly love it on the A7Riii. Just wondering how it stacks up to this 50mm 1.2 on the EOS R, although I don't see Canon with a camera that would currently make me jump ship from the A7Riii. Maybe the next gen EOS R will be more enticing though. I love those Canon colors and the lenses Canon is putting out for the new mount are no joke.

Did you use ND for daylight shots at 1.2?

at 5:10 what’s that silver camera in the middle!? it looks amazing

How about a comparison with the ef 50mm f1.2L?

Can u pls say the shutterspeed for the unsharp samples ?

I would to see a comparison between this and the Canon EOS 50mm f/1.2L USM.

I still don't get why the aperture changes as well if you make it equivalent to a FF. Like Tony said, Fuji 56 mm f1.2 becomes 85 mm f1.8?? Can someone explain please?

Does this camera capture a RAW image?

Can it fit to canon m6 ?

Tony great informative session -- loved this one

comparison to EF 50mm f/1.2 L USM would be interesting, even on the same EOS R body w/ adapter. Bit unfair to compare L class lens to (still amazing) f/1.4 50mm USM... ;-)

Would you use this 50mm 1.2 or the Sony 85mm 1.4G for your portrait works.??? We would like to see a comparison review of both lenses.

@geko9425

5 жыл бұрын

50 mm and 85 mm has different usage for portraits. You should know that in what case you has to use which lens. Therefore you cant ask "Hey, which is better for portraits?" It depends on what kind of portraits you will shoot

Anyone want RAW files for this lens taken on the Eos R? I have some from the canon roadshow in the UK.

Are there any good equivalents for sony?

I have the Zeiss MF 50, 100 and 21 for EF. These new Canon lenses remind me of them and get me excited about the new changes at Canon. 50 mm, 28-70, and 24-105 look beyond awesome. Hoping on a IBIS body...I really like their new type autofocus...

The Canon 50mm f1.2 EF would be a much better comparison to the RF mount though... The 50mm f1.4 as always been considered fairly soft for it's price tag (and compared to the nifty-fifty)

@RickyHarline

5 жыл бұрын

The 50mm F1.2 is even softer. Their sharpest lens is their newest nifty fifty, the F1.8 STM. It also has much better control over vignetting, contrast, and chromatic aberration. Canon desperately needs to update their 50mm primes for their SLR line.

@backslash36

5 жыл бұрын

I've been able to make this comparison myself at some Canon event. Wide open, the EF 50mm f1.2 is way softer than its RF counterpart. The R mount truly raises the bar way higher than you can imagine.

@unsilencednation6036

5 жыл бұрын

@@RickyHarline the 50mm F1.2 is MUCH sharper than its 1.4 counterpart. What are you smoking?

Wait a second......you shot at 1.2 in bright light and f4.5 in low light.....and there you complain about IBIS. . . As much as I appreciate your reviews and the technical analysis...that broke my heart there

@JerryMcMurphy

4 жыл бұрын

Yeah... 1/60 second with a f/1.2 lens!? You’ve gotta be trying to take a bad portrait!

What would you recommend for eos R if I was to just get *one* all around lens?!

@mcs5271

5 жыл бұрын

24-105 RF F4, it is awesome.

@Keepinitreal55

5 жыл бұрын

Michael Sawyer I returned it, way too heavy for me

Love the football joke.

I think the 50mm (or 35mm) is a normal lens in regard to the degree of compression it makes, not too distorted nor too compressed. Thanks for your great videos , I really learned a lot from your channel. Thanks again for all your work..

Would have compared it with the Zony 50mm 1.4. Hope this comparison is coming ;)

Tony, congratulation to your precise analysis and clear minded explanations! Will You please compare the EOS R+50f1.2 vs your good old EOS 5DsR+Sigma Art 50f1.4? All the best from Budapest, Europe

@tekguyphoto

5 жыл бұрын

I was in Budapest this summer . Lovely place. Lots to photograph. I was told I might get robbed so I took a smaller mirorrless (A73+kit lens) instead of my Canon with the L lenses. Next time I'm going back I will bring the gear I'm comfortable using. Love the bridges at night. Jovok visza nem sokara.

How does it compare against Sigma 55mm Art E mount on Sony?

@geko9425

5 жыл бұрын

That lens is for canon shooters and you couldnt adapt it for Sony. So why is this information relevant for you? Todays designed lenses are all really good it doesnt matter if one of the lens resolve 0.5% more than the other

Canon eos R good enough personal use on video?

Tony - Just wondering why you didn’t compare this lens to the Canon EF 50 f/1.2L lens?

@marioslrzn

5 жыл бұрын

John Richards he did and also the RF28-70 f2 and said it was still sharper, pay attention

I saw an article today on Canon rumors showing that Canon filed a patent for sensor stabilization !

Always like your videos. An old casual snapshot 4/3 shooter using an Olympus 25mm F1.8...all I could afford.

how about a comparison with the new Sigma 40 1.4? that one looks crazy good on paper.

50% of shots in focus? I think I would want a higher percentage for $4600 camera + lens. But hey, that is just me. Good points about lack of IBIS. Using a high MP camera like this with a very sharp lens like this you notice any flaws.

@weschilton

5 жыл бұрын

Or you use a tripod like photographers have been doing for over 100 years. It’s not that big of a deal. very few cameras have IBIS.

@ourtvchannel

5 жыл бұрын

Except the market leaders

@myhandlewastaken

5 жыл бұрын

Work slower, problem solved. Especially with a camera like the EOS R.

@shotput8

5 жыл бұрын

Why limit your photography? Why not buy a camera that meets your photographic needs? I am just an amateur but I shoot many different types of photography from sports to wildlife to scenic to portraits to use of vintage lenses. There is no reason for Canon to limit the capabilities of the EOS R. In my travels I have found many places that don't allow tripods. That is why I want a camera that features image stabilization. Some caverns don't even allow you to lean against the walls to steady yourself.

@myhandlewastaken

5 жыл бұрын

@@shotput8 every tool is not an all-purpose tool. Nor should they be. You will find as you learn more, and require more from what you use, that each tool has an optimal setting/situation for optimal results. That thing may or may not be limited in other areas. And that's okay.

Why not compare the 50mm 1.2L with the new 50mm 1.2 lens for mirrorless?

I would love to pick up that body...keep up the good work!

How is sharpness compared to Sony 55 1.8

@jn3750

5 жыл бұрын

This will cheapo lens has no chance with the Canon

How about vs Otus 55 mm 1.4?

You could also try the new Pentax-D FA* 50mm F1.4 SDM AW ;)

@ 11:53: "Phoblographer"? Is that a thing now?

Thanks for the review. If your microphone is a Rode NT1A as it seems to be, it´s a side-address mic, you are talking to it perpendicular to its diaphragm. Cheers.

It's a stunning bit of engineering and optics, so you've got to appreciate the achievement despite it not being a practical consideration for most of us. For someone like yourself Tony, at the apex of photography, I can imagine it to be a must have to give you the edge.

Thanks for that, been dying to see the results of that lens. Challenges (or character as some would call it) aside, that is an amazing tool, and in the right hands is going to produce some incredible images, despite the limitations of the current body.

a crystal clear review, nicely done Tony

Hey tony! You can tell the angle/scale of view is like the human eye by opening your other eye & lining up the scene. Should be almost 1 for 1 when you line things up

Comparison with Fuji is not fair. Lightroom does terrible with the Fuji files. Plus Fuji is crop sensor with lower resolution. And Fuji 56mm + X-T3 = $2400 Canon 50mm + Canon R = $4600! Twice the price with worse auto focus and a single card slot. Sorry Tony, but kind of a silly comparison if you ask me.

@marioslrzn

5 жыл бұрын

SDMacMan did you just say that fuji xt3 beats dual pixel focusing? I guess KZread if full of sheep

Stop promoting the giveaway!!! You are reducing my chances of winning :'(

@nuaveb

5 жыл бұрын

Well said...

@myerwerl

5 жыл бұрын

Its closed 😢

Tony, please compare it with Sigma art 50mm f1.4. waiting for that ...

HI Tony, I would really be interested in comparing images from the EOS R with the 50/1.2 vs the A7III with the Zeiss FE 1.8/55. To me it is an interesting comparison because one is a large and expensive option vs a cheaper and far more portable one. Comparison should account for overall picture rendering, sharpness and effective T-stop benefit from a 1.2. We all know that we have diminishing returns in terms of T-Stop with extreme apertures. Let's consider that Canon's pixels are tiny due to the deal pixel design which it is not a good thing, although, as you pointed out the 50/1.2 has the optics so close to the sensor that possibly pixel vignetting has been minimized. In total honesty I think your comparison with the Canon 50/1.4 is not a fair comparison. Canon 50/1.4 is not a very sharp lens at all with really low contrast, which makes the new 50/1.2 look better than what I think really is vs more competitive optics. Why you picked such lens instead of better lenses?

At 9:19 wooooow . Now I’m thinking when they introduce higher megapixel body then this lens is going be even more sharper .

@axiom6947

5 жыл бұрын

thats why bigger is better. You can't make sharp lens for higher megapixels cameras without making bigger lens )) I love big lenses ))

@airdailyx

5 жыл бұрын

And why sooner or later Sony will need to seriously reevaluate the current mount.

Thanks for sneaking in an astro shot for me. I actually shoot a lot of panoramas at 50mm, although I'll probably be switching to the Sigma 40mm Art when it comes out.

The main reason that I am interested in the above video is that I need to be able to focus in manual as I do a lot of focus merge photography. And switching from live-view in program and then going back in manual to the SLR viewfinder is a real pain.

@NewMoon57

5 жыл бұрын

I am not wanting to view the scene by pumping the iso. What i need to accomplish is to be in manual and to be able to see what i am photographing. Just give me the view that i need and to have the camera take the pic at the manually pre set. Is this possible? I do not want i To keep going between program and manual as this not possibe to do in an actual shoot.

So you're telling that dynamic range depends on camera lens also?

Good information, Tony. Now, bring on that promised RF 24-105 kit lens review, which you mentioned was pretty much as sharp as the RF 28-70. Can't wait.

The images I took when I went to the canon UK roadshow were ridiculously sharp. And obviously the canon colour science. Absolutely stunning lens quality.

Just wish you would have compare it to the EF 50mm 1.2

Awesome piece of glass Tony , Thanks.

I have a Nikkor 50mm 1.2 (manual) It's got an ethereal quality to it..almost bloom-like sometimes, with the right light..Love it!

Please review the new RF 24-105 4.0

Great review thank you

Tony you can eliminate camera shake with a tripod and delayed shutter.

When doing the brief comparison to Fuji I would have expected you use the 35/1.4 since it has an effective full frame focal length of approx 50mm. That would have been more of an apples-to-apples comparison @ F1.4.

Can you shoot with a7r3 and develop same result ?

@alexmeier19

5 жыл бұрын

Canon 50 f1.4 = 300$

@AcidicDelusion

5 жыл бұрын

@@alexmeier19 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

@12340786ful

5 жыл бұрын

Alex you are right . And people don’t know that Zeiss Otus 55 f/1.4 costs around $$4000 and its manual focus lens . And from pictures that tony showing it’s seems like it’s not far behind the Zeiss outs

At 6:49 you talk about differences "in the corner" ... but you're looking at/showing the middle of the image ... ??

I do not see much difference in the particular shot from the 28-75 @f/2; if anything I find it sharper than the 50. Perhaps it my utube video - maybe make photos available to download as other viewers may have similar problems. The Canon 50mm f/1.4 and even the f/1.2 L version were pretty soft wide open; so the result is not surprising for the R f/1.2 which I think gets at least a large part of its superiority from having the rear of the lens (flatter and) closer to the sensor.

How come you didn’t talk anything about the performance of the lens for shooting video? I found that the autofocus to be very noisy, at least compared to other modern lenses and also not nearly as reliable as the Canon RF 24-105mm F/4.0.

11:17 Did Tony just called the model's eye a lens? :D

@suridemis

5 жыл бұрын

Péter Sági Technical it is 👌

I’ve used an A series Pentax 50/1.2 on Sony cameras via a Techart Pro AF module and a K-to-M adapter. Works great. Underrated lens. The new Canon looks really impressive, based on multiple reviews, but I’ll wait for the R system to mature before considering it.

hmmm, interesting, not comparing with the EF 50 1.2?

are these photos straight out of camera? the fuji colour is, like, wayyy better

Compare it with Pentax dfa 50 1.4 :) beautiful and round bokeh all the way to the corners, and tack sharp across the frame from 1.4

Excellent info...thank you.

Hey Tony! Love your channel, but the Canon 50 mm f/1.4 is really soft wide open, almost unusable. It would be better to compare this lens with something better like the Sigma ART 50 mm f/1.4 :)

awsome,- but my mind is set on the x-t3 - and the blackmagic Pocket 4K,-

Great Review Tony! I will say I much prefer manual controls on lenses then electronic ones overall however image quality on this lens looks to be fantastic! Its too bad that the flange distance is so short.. by that i mean this lens can never be speedboosted to other camera systems like the GH5. Seems a waste to tie this expensive lens to just the Canon cameras. EOS R is 20mm flange distance . Micro Four Thirds is 19.25mm.. that leaves about 0.75mm for an adapter ring...not a lot to work with..

So your saying the new EOS lens isn't compatible with the FD system?!? Oh darn.

I love my canon 85mm 1.2 II Such a unique look even though it’s a chunky slow focusing monster. It’s just such a treat to shoot with

Tony. Something about compression in your audio makes your solo videos very hard to listen to. It’s too (same volume, tone) ish. I dunno audio stuff. But it subconsciously makes me try to “clear” my ears like when driving over mountain. Love the podcast btw!

I am not sure if lack of IBIS is really such a big concern. If you do portraits, anything about 1/60, 1/90 is risky, not only because of camera shake, but also because of person movement. This knowledge and proper technique give me consistent, very good resuts, starting from 1/125 (Auto ISO on Nikon). And if you spend $2,300 on 1.2 lens, you probably plan to use 1.2 aperture lot of time - which hardly would force you to go that down with your shutter speed.And, IBIS body would be larger, heavier, and less battery-efficient.

There should be adapter for r lens to use for canon cameras

Damn, camera shake is really a big issue on this one! Even without IBIS really surprised to see such blurry results :(

The image stabilization provided by the current crop of tripods is pretty amazing.....no reason why one should get soft photos with high resolving lenses and sensors.

I just started viewing this video BUT.... I need to request something of you and Chelsea.... Here it goes. Many of us have never used a mirrorless camera and having used live-view on my Digital SLR I have misgivings about buying a mirrorless anything if it cannot be used with my manually operated Studio Lighting. Your know where you could use a pc sinc if your camera even had one. But that is not the problem because I have hotshoe mounted transmitter/receivers for all of them. Here is the problem. How am I going focus in manual if it is too dark for the screen to give an image. I think that I have gotten the answer as to turning live view off but you have all the equipment and could give an answer in the way of a video covering that. Would you kindly do so. No on ever covers things that could make a studio session. Have the model(s) and lighting all ready but cannot see anything so I switch back to my DSLR. This is imaginary situation as I have not purchased the Mirrorless body. It will probably be the R as I have been using Canon ever since the F-1 Came out many years ago and am currently using DSLRs. I have a lot of FD and EOS mnt lenses so it will be nice if someone will come out with a no glass fd to R mound. I do not want to purchase an M50 to do that. Thanks for your help.

@happythec1am

5 жыл бұрын

John Spurr when dealing with studio lighting or ND filters there are setting you can turn on to always give you a preview image by pumping ISO or whatever it needs to show you a preview even if your scene is dark. Not sure how the EOS r works with this yet, early Sony models were not great at this at first but the A7r III’s are better.

Why are you complaining about camerashake at 10:00, when your shooting at F4. 5?

Very good gob, thanks