Greatest swimmers ever 3) Spitz 2) Phelps 1) Shark

@timmyasikin3953

2 жыл бұрын

True.....

@nicolaslj

2 жыл бұрын

Stockfish

@alfaseeds13

2 жыл бұрын

Obama

@MMMHOTCHEEZE

2 жыл бұрын

@@alfaseeds13 Obamna?

@jamesb5479

2 жыл бұрын

@@MMMHOTCHEEZE obammma

Best painters to ever live: 5- Monet 4- van Gogh 3- Michelangelo 2- Picasso 1- Epson ED357 Plus

@kanker5256

2 жыл бұрын

beksinski is above all and he is far from the best

@peterahdy7354

2 жыл бұрын

@@kanker5256 loved his art, any other recommendations?

@mbaharuddindstaba1320

2 жыл бұрын

holy crap this is so smart funny

@RatafakTehPlachta

Жыл бұрын

@@peterahdy7354 you know goyas black paintings?

@galax12370

Жыл бұрын

God- Edp445

“Sure Muhammad Ali was good and all, but compared to a tank he was trash”

@tausenrico126

2 жыл бұрын

Lmao

@onkara4363

2 жыл бұрын

😂😂😂

@MrChrisdube

2 жыл бұрын

People LOVE to cherry pick Muhammed Ali's career. Yes, he was great when he fought Liston, Frazier, Foreman, Norton etc, but they are strangely silent about Ron Lyle, Alfredo Evangelista, Chuck Wepner (who!), and my personal favourite Leon Spinks who had a grand total of SIX fights at that time! Greatest fighter ever? No freaking way!

@eh86055

2 жыл бұрын

@@MrChrisdube Sure, Leon Spinks may have been better and all but compared to a tank, he's still trash.

@MrChrisdube

2 жыл бұрын

@@eh86055 LOL! Yeah, that rant WAS a bit off topic...

Hikaru: *looks at Tal's picture, name, and number 5* "I'm going to assume Tal's one.

@G1stGBless

2 жыл бұрын

How do you think he gets his content? By not reviewing it or ever seeing articles on his own. Common, hes a content creator. He knew every player. This is like when people believe in pro wrestling, santa claus and reality tv.

@paulandcherylerickson8536

2 жыл бұрын

😄

@chanelname969

2 жыл бұрын

Then he continues to say he( Tal) made bad moves, bad game, not so srrong player 😂

@ignzore

2 жыл бұрын

@@chanelname969 but he did make a bad move lol. and there is some truth to the statement that most gms nowadays with the level of technology would demolish players from that era

@rap3208

2 жыл бұрын

@@ignzore better preparation, better training, leading exclusive/dedicated chess life (24/7/365), enormous library of theory and past games.

Fastest sprinters to ever live. 5. Asafa Powel 4. Yohan Blake 3. Tyson Gay 2. Usain Bolt 1. Fastest sprinting vehicle

@Raghuveer2798

2 жыл бұрын

Lol totally stupid article 😂

@youtubewatcher8982

2 жыл бұрын

1. Ferrari

@comicallylargemegaphone7579

2 жыл бұрын

@@youtubewatcher8982 non

@uberneanderthal

2 жыл бұрын

in fairness, at least with this list everyone on it is artificially enhanced by synthetic chemicals, lul

@comicallylargemegaphone7579

2 жыл бұрын

No

This is ridiculous. If the person includes Alpha Zero as the most dangerous, then NO human player would be on the list, it would merely be the top 5 chess engines, so article is completely in error with the 4 human players.

@uberneanderthal

2 жыл бұрын

dangerous relative to competition. alpha zero was absolutely smoking other AI.

@4thzone697

2 жыл бұрын

@@uberneanderthal the way it does it aswell, terrifying

@isaacjacob3590

2 жыл бұрын

@@uberneanderthal Morphy should've been nº1 or nº 2 then. Kasparov was almost defeated by Karpov numerous times, so he shouldn't be that high in the position I guess.

@uberneanderthal

2 жыл бұрын

@@isaacjacob3590 agree, Morphy #1. and also Deep Blue with at least an honorable mention.

@RMF49

2 жыл бұрын

I think Alpha Zero was included because among chess engines it was 100% unique as a non materialistic attacker. In one game vs Stockfish, Alpha Zero was down a knight and two pawns for almost 40 moves. That is astounding.

Fischer became world champion- beat all the Russians, before computers. He sat in his NY apartment and played against himself. He was truly amazing, beyond what most people know.

@ZapOKill

2 жыл бұрын

sitting at home and playing with your self... amazing

@niranjanrajesh1058

2 жыл бұрын

Also not many know that he won majority of his tournaments in his time,some of the ones he lost was because he didnt like the conditions of the tournament,or because of soviet cheating. I dont remember if it was 1963,but in some tournament,probably the candidates,the 3 russian players drew all their matches with each other,with the average game being 19 moves. Clear sign of cheating. Fischer also was ahead in the 1967 interzonal at the half way point,and quite ahead of everyone else,but then decided to leave coz he didnt agree with the rules. So fischer could've won the world championship long back

@jamie49868

2 жыл бұрын

@@niranjanrajesh1058 Yep. The Russians basically ran the chess world, and would predetermine who would win, and the players all fell in line...or else! In the match against Spassky, the Russians had the full squad of past and future WCs and all the serious contenders amassed and prepared against him. The entire saga, from the 1962 Interzonal (Where Petrosian, Keres and Geller (nice team!!!) ganged up and cheated him out. Fischer went home, and boy did he go to work.

@fivehighflush

2 жыл бұрын

He ran from Karpov. Get real.

@rabailey10

2 жыл бұрын

Agreed. Fischer defeated a Soviet team composed of some of the greatest chess players ever. Soviets worked as a team and did everything they could to try to slow Fischer down. But in his prime. Fischer was over 100 elo over Spassky. He is still top 20 players in terms of elo pb despite elo inflation.

smartest mathmaticians of all time 3: Hypatia 2: Isaac Newton 1: a calculator

@wisechalk3432

2 жыл бұрын

This is gold

@innosanto

2 жыл бұрын

Archimedes and Gauss and Newton and some other ones.

@linuxbasic3399

2 жыл бұрын

calculator wish... may be if you say fastest calculator...

@uncahay

2 жыл бұрын

A calculator isn't a mathematician. The best mathematicians ever are 3. Gauss, 2. Euler, 1. Von Neumann

@realitykicksin8755

2 жыл бұрын

This list shows you watched the video.

"After the game everybody always had a way to beat me" - Tal

@viveknamikaze761

Жыл бұрын

Lol

@fabricioantonio5882

Жыл бұрын

thats why Tal is a legend, if he plays bad moves then just beat him, but they couldnt, dark forest idea

Fischer had a Tyson like aura. Everyone feared him and were beaten before they approached the board.

@BeedingWimmington

2 жыл бұрын

True

@RaineriHakkarainen

2 жыл бұрын

Bobby Fischer against Boris Spassky 17 wins 11 losses! My old computer tought 5:22 minutes Capablanca-Reti game move! Same computer tought 4:37 Kasparov-Kramnik game move! Capablanca better than Kasparov! Capablanca would Beat The Prime Boris Spassky easily 8 wins 5 draws no loss! Boris Spassky The weakest chess world champion Ever! Even Magnus Carlsen would Beat The Prime Boris Spassky easily 6 wins 6 draws no loss!

@fonzgoose2279

2 жыл бұрын

Spassky beat Petrosian: he can't be the weakest.

@zenwarrior3603

2 жыл бұрын

And he was from Brooklyn too!

@dego9246

2 жыл бұрын

@@RaineriHakkarainen I’ve seen you many times trying to minimize Spassky! Spassky world champion. You’re not world champion! Spassky better than you!

Alpha zero number 1? lol, it's like making a top 5 CSGO players and giving the number 1 to an AimBot, completely nonsense

@deepakhr3057

2 жыл бұрын

You can compare aimbots with stockfish. AlphaZero learned to play chess by itself.

@ReiMizere

2 жыл бұрын

@@deepakhr3057 you missed the point

@Obi-WanKannabis

2 жыл бұрын

@@deepakhr3057 Aimbots learned to aim by themselves too

@deepakhr3057

2 жыл бұрын

@@Obi-WanKannabis I thought humans wrote the code to look for the head and trigger a gun shot... It's a very hard program to write in reality, but very different from the AlphaZero approach

@Obi-WanKannabis

2 жыл бұрын

@@deepakhr3057 AlphaZero was given the instructions on the rules of chess and played against itself learning something each game untill it became ridiculously good at it. Sure, you can argue that it is a player and not a chess engine, but ultimately you could code an aim bot to learn how to aim like that and it wouldn't be fair to put it up against humans.

none of them defeated me.

@randomguynolonger727yearsa9

2 жыл бұрын

None has ever defeated me either! We must be super GMs!

@dmproduction1384

2 жыл бұрын

because you didnt play chess.

@randomname5580

2 жыл бұрын

You’ve never played against a computer before? (For the sake of my argument let’s say that stockfish is the same as alpha 0)

@-parrrate

2 жыл бұрын

@@randomname5580 i never finish games against computer so it can eventually crash allowing me to righteously claim my victory

@MrSupernova111

2 жыл бұрын

You can't lose if you don't play. You also can't win. That much is true.

Bobby Fischer, the only grand master who demolished the Russian grand masters. Remember that chess was and is very popular in Soviet Union (Russia today) and they produced terrific grand masters. But Bobby annihilated all of them, this loner from the US. This was back in the day where chess computer engine was non existent.

@WeCube1898

2 жыл бұрын

Bobby is good both Attacker-Defender/Tactician-Strategist.

@MrSupernova111

2 жыл бұрын

@Elijah S. . Fischer was the #1 rated player in the world for much longer than one year. And he was also world champion for more than one year because he didn't forfeit his title until he refused to defend it 2-3 years later.

@simongpunkt

2 жыл бұрын

Too bad he went insane in his later years

@bestly837

2 жыл бұрын

@Black Swan55 chad cheated lmao

@nealsausen4651

2 жыл бұрын

@@simongpunkt : unfortunately geniuses are often insane that’s why they’re geniuses they’re wired differently from everybody else? I wouldn’t want to go Explore inside the head of a genius like that! It would scare the shit out of me! And Bobby was a tormented genius, he hated his own people! But he was the genius!

Top players nowadays are amazing, but they can memorize computer moves that they would of NEVER figured out on their own. Back in the 60s and 70s they didn't have super chess computers, they sat in a room for hours upon hours with a chess board figuring out what the best move is. Pure geniuses back in the day.

@ME0WMERE

2 жыл бұрын

they are still smart, they merely know extra lines from computers

@ME0WMERE

2 жыл бұрын

@Black Swan55 flagging chess engines does not make you smart

@NJ-wb1cz

2 жыл бұрын

So what, do your think that Fischer never studied openings and endgames? Do you actually think that he studied like Alphazero - never seeing any games by any other players ever in his life? And in any case, just because Fischer's preparation methods were massively inferior doesn't mean that he was actually a better player. It may very well be that his memory was simply subpar for modern chess and so he couldn't have handled modern GMs regardless how he prepared

@philburpalooza8

Жыл бұрын

This commentary on the game proves they just have no inside their clue to how life was like before computers. And even less appreciation for the political context of the cold war. It's pretty sad.

@innosanto

Жыл бұрын

@@ME0WMERE there is alot of memory

The most terrifying chess player is Tank Top Levy.

@physicsisawesome696

2 жыл бұрын

No, it is the lichess guy who say "oh no my Queen".

@legueu

2 жыл бұрын

@@physicsisawesome696 Looking at one picture of Levy an one of Eric: It's the same picture!

@theraccoonasaur3282

2 жыл бұрын

Drunk tank top Levy

@legueu

2 жыл бұрын

@@theraccoonasaur3282 Drunk tank top Levy can beat up both Drunk Eric Hansen and Drunk Hikaru.

@-_Nuke_-

2 жыл бұрын

xD

Fischer doesnt get nearly enough credit for his incredible domination of the game for all those years.

@12jswilson

2 жыл бұрын

He was pretty clearly the best player of the 1960s. Only reason he didn't become world champion in 1963 or certainly 1966 is because of his weird hangups. One Interzonal he was was winning with 8.5 out of 10 and up and quit. Larsen ended up winning it with 17.5/24, so I don't think there's any doubt he'd have won or at least easily qualified for the Candidate's. I also think he would have been Karpov, even having not played for 3 years. He took a similar break from 1967-1970, then took 3/4 from Petrosian in USSR vs the World and demolished the Interzonal that same year. Is it possible Karpov could have beaten a rusty Fischer? Of course. However, Fischer also spotted Spassky 2 games and still won by 3. Karpov wasn't 5 games better than Spassky. Maybe 2-3 over 24. Fischer also probably could have won by more, but opted to just force draws the latter half of the match with only 1 decisive game after game 13.

@niranjanrajesh1058

2 жыл бұрын

@@12jswilson its weird but i typed something of this sort just now under another comment section. Didnt copy tho. He dropped out of the 1967 interzonal while leading the whole thing. He won the 1963 interzonal and then lost in the candidates to the 3 russians who colluded and drew all their matches against each other with the average game between them being just 19 moves. As you said he didnt play pro chess in his formative years between 1967 and 1970. Then came back and won a blitz tournament by a huge margin consisting of the strongest players in the world,despite them having played blitz a lot and him not having played blitz many times. Then won the interzonal in convincing fashion,which wouldve been the 3rd consecitive he won an interzonal had he not wuit the 67 edition. Then smashed taimanov,larsen and petrosian. Then smashed spassky. Only lost 2 actual games against spassky,and one was by making a blunder that idt hes ever made in his career. Won every single us tournament that he competed in. Only perfect score in history of the tournament. His only major loss/poor performance in his career was in the 1958 candidates,and its ridiculous that thats even considered bad since he was just 15,and playing in the candidates. Hes by far the most dominant player ever

@niranjanrajesh1058

2 жыл бұрын

@@12jswilson its weird but i typed something of this sort just now under another comment section. Didnt copy tho. He dropped out of the 1967 interzonal while leading the whole thing. He won the 1963 interzonal and then lost in the candidates to the 3 russians who colluded and drew all their matches against each other with the average game between them being just 19 moves. As you said he didnt play pro chess in his formative years between 1967 and 1970. Then came back and won a blitz tournament consisting of the strongest players in the world,despite them having played blitz a lot and him not having played blitz a lot.

@niranjanrajesh1058

2 жыл бұрын

@@12jswilson its weird but i typed something of this sort just now under another comment section. Didnt copy tho. He dropped out of the 1967 interzonal while leading the whole thing. He won the 1963 interzonal and then lost in the candidates to the 3 russians who colluded and drew all their matches against each other with the average game between them being just 19 moves. As you said he didnt play pro chess in his formative years between 1967 and 1970. Then came back and won a blitz tournament consisting of the strongest players in the world,despite them having played blitz a lot and him not having played blitz a lot.

@AnthonyShuker

2 жыл бұрын

yes he does, what are you on about?

When I didn't see xQc's name as number 1, the entire credibility of this article suddenly collapsed in my eyes.

@elijahquigley4145

2 жыл бұрын

Charlie must by the number 0 if xQc is number 1

@2nerC9

2 жыл бұрын

No mention of the wooden shield and lobster pincer either…

@gamingsoups

2 жыл бұрын

juicer time

@Blinkers2007GameDev

Жыл бұрын

What r u talking about? Frank is clearly number one. xQc is second

Heeey, the most dangerous chess player was from Russia I think, a serial killer if I'm not mistaken.

@CommandingElbow

2 жыл бұрын

lol

@mohitmohan7375

2 жыл бұрын

😂🔥

@kirbyculp3449

2 жыл бұрын

Yes, Krylenko terrorised the nation.

*Nothing can be as dangerous as Family.*

@asmodeus1033

2 жыл бұрын

You’re right fam

@mamakking4500

2 жыл бұрын

Dominic Toretto would be proud

That's what I like about chess players like Hikaru, they're so honest with their thoughts. Questioning Tal's abilities as a chess player, not realizing that it was a game from when he was 12, 13 years old. It all adds up.

@IRON--MAN

2 жыл бұрын

Yes! He didn't agreed with that game of Tal (despite of not being aware of that it was a game of 12 yr old tal), and he found out the mistakes and criticised it, that's true honesty

@dominusdone5023

2 жыл бұрын

Lol true honestly you guys dont know what ur talking about the guy has problems with every gm. Shit talks lower rated player. Called TAL TRASH like he achieved tals wc title

@Hamstray

2 жыл бұрын

That's a picture of Tal when he was 12 ;)

@dw6424

2 жыл бұрын

Tal would’ve slumped hikaru, he’s all talk Mikhail was having fun in the first game, Hikaru is the questionable one.

@joshuadickerson1902

2 жыл бұрын

I respectfully disagree cause tal was world champ

This look on Hikaru’s face when stockfish says tal’s move is a blunder… then turns out he’s 12 lmao

@johnnyralte5985

2 жыл бұрын

then why do the author select that game to represent tal

*I can’t believe they ranked Hans at #1.*

@jorgejim28

Жыл бұрын

Lol !

@flixomer351

Жыл бұрын

The bead speaks for itself

Morphy's calculation ability was astounding. Study the complexity of his 1858 blindfold simul games in Paris and you'll see what I mean. Fischer was right when he said he had "full sight of the chessboard and never blundered". It must have been terrifying for his opponents when they realized they were caught in the web.

@demondelaplace5161

Жыл бұрын

pff morphy was trash copared to ALPHAZERO

@Joshuaposada

Жыл бұрын

@@demondelaplace5161 u can't compare goats from different eras. What if Morphy was born in this era?

@demondelaplace5161

Жыл бұрын

@@Joshuaposada I guarantee he loses to AlphaZero. AlphaZero is the greatest, aside from Stockfish 15.

@Joshuaposada

Жыл бұрын

@@demondelaplace5161 what are you talking about? Are you insinuating that Morphy couldn't beat Alpha Zero?

@lite8484

Жыл бұрын

@@Joshuaposada bro he's joking about the list, where alphazero is ranked number one

2300 level? That’s like a dream come true for 99% of us

@Obi-WanKannabis

2 жыл бұрын

at 12 years old*

@VD-fc8dy

2 жыл бұрын

2300 just isn't impressive to people who've been studying and playing chess for over a decade and play at a top level. It's a really high rating yes, but when you're at a level where you can consistently beat 2300s even with piece odds/time odds then of course you'd be unimpressed by 2300s. Out of 10000 games against 2300s Hikaru would lose maybe 1 or 2 depending on his mood. It's crazy but that's how it works

@dominusdone5023

2 жыл бұрын

@@VD-fc8dy 2300 is imprssive for 12 year old do

@lostone9700

2 жыл бұрын

Its not that hard. Im almost there with virtually no study. Just play and brieflly look over your games after

@pranavpendurti8082

2 жыл бұрын

@@lostone9700 are you almost 2300 fide?

Yeah Bobby was definitely the most talented. It would’ve been awesome to see how good he would have been now and days with the computers and more openings

@Shendue

Жыл бұрын

*nowadays Fischer hated theory, tho. And he thought modern chess is too much about it and lacks space for creativity.

@octaviosalvatierra1389

Жыл бұрын

@@Shendue and its true though, you kinda start to win in the middle or the end game with all the memorizing but yeah all things have to evolve its life

@andersj91

Жыл бұрын

@@Shendue over simplification. He knew all the theory he just liked to freestyle to counter expectations. He would certainly be formidable with today's tools as better theory craft creates better counter play.

@EpicShooterF

Жыл бұрын

Well he beat Nigel short 8-0 at the age of 58. While nigel was top 3 in the world. And he has a higher accuracy from his games than even Carlsen has with correct computer help. He was also winning classical tournaments with insane score. Beating them 10 games in a row. Which even if you say that the grandmasters from that era were weaker, I highly doubt even Magnus could beat them 10 in a row without a single draw. It's very easy to see that he is the greatest of all time.

@hb7137

Жыл бұрын

@@EpicShooterF it was 20 in a row the greatest winning streak by bobby

Not only was tal 13 in this game. But he himself mentioned h3 g4 sequence as wining in his book discussing why he went for the sac

@Blinkers2007GameDev

Жыл бұрын

what?

@binor1666

Жыл бұрын

@@Blinkers2007GameDev what what? Moron

Hikaru at 3:15 blowing my mind. He looks at a position and instantly knows a series of moves that are obvious to him. It's like a language they can speak that only a few can understand.

@suntzuartofwar5477

Жыл бұрын

bros like duuuh take take take here there mate , im ur 69th like heh

@FearTheOldB

Жыл бұрын

Thats the chess gimmick: memory and pattern recognition.

@michaelmurray6577

11 ай бұрын

@@FearTheOldB How about the engine showing the best line on the right of the board. Ever noticed that?

@spenhunter3592

9 ай бұрын

its pretty easy actually, im 1800 and if i was looking at that in a 10 minute rapid game id find that in 5 seconds, but hikaru obviously instantly spots it

Quote of the year: Nakamura said “Tal was maybe not a very good chess player.” Straight face. :-o

@naughter3674

2 жыл бұрын

Probably salty that magnus said that Hikaru was just decent lol

@Lemon-qs3uz

2 жыл бұрын

@@naughter3674 No, that doesn't make sense lol

@naughter3674

2 жыл бұрын

@@Lemon-qs3uz how does it not make sense? Or another question, why are you taking a meme as a serious criticism point?

@Lemon-qs3uz

2 жыл бұрын

@@naughter3674 Because why would what Magnus said in one video influence hikaru to critique tal? Doesn't make sense.

@naughter3674

2 жыл бұрын

@@Lemon-qs3uz hence the second question, it was a meme reference. Stop being a buzzkill

I love this commentary, Hikaru knows immediately when something just isnt right.

@bmoneybby

2 жыл бұрын

He straight murdered a 12 year old Tal haha

@dw6424

2 жыл бұрын

@@bmoneybby Hikaru would lose against Tal , it’s clear

@teodorul9280

Жыл бұрын

@@dw6424 you know nothing about chess if you really think that way

@jokersupremacy3774

Жыл бұрын

@@dw6424 lol grandmasters today could beat legends of 1600- 1800 century players

@ablejack3

Жыл бұрын

@@jokersupremacy3774 Depends. If Morphy were around today, he would also have today's resources. He'd probably suggest that Alpha-Zero had a more elegant way to win.

What a shoddy article. Here we are a year later and Stockfish 15 reaches 4000 ELO. Alphazero is nowhere in sight.

@b1rdy0xf

Жыл бұрын

The article is from May 2018... so 4 months after alpha zero preprint became public....

@vtorious9102

Жыл бұрын

Journos are trash

@gamemeister27

Жыл бұрын

Stockfish 15 is like 3600-3700. It'd still likely beat Alphazero handily these days, but the 4000 number isn't accurate

@aliensconfirmed3498

Жыл бұрын

They stopped Alpha. Stockfish became stronger only after implementing neural networks. Leela is based on Alpha's ideas and it's almost as strong as Stockfish. If Google continued to work on Alpha there is no doubt it would be the strongest.

The most dangerous chess players. _The one guy at __1:22_ - *Nikhil Kamath*

@saurabh5148

2 жыл бұрын

🤣🤣🤣

@comicallylargemegaphone7579

2 жыл бұрын

（°ο°）

Tal didn't like that game either. What Tal said about it in "Life and Games of Mikhail Tal", his assessment is that he played horribly: "Black has an extra bishop, for which I now do not see any compensation at all. On the other hand, it was not difficult to detect that the black king's pawn cover had been weakened. White continues as if nothing has happened." "Much as I would like to, I cannot place this game in the category of 'intuitive' or 'Tal' sacrifices." "Such a critical assessment is by no means a sign of the sceptical attitude of a venerable grandmaster to his young inexperienced namesake. If I had had to annotate this game 25 years ago, the verdict would have been the same. It is difficult to believe that white should miss the chance to win the game immediately using 'artihmetic': 11.h3 Qf5 (11...Qxg2 12.Rh2) 12.g4 Qg6 13.Nh4 Ne5 14.Bb5+ or 14.Qe2." He was 12 at the time, Zilber was 15. Nevertheless it is representative that, even at 12, Tal had the spirit of a great attacker. He makes a terrible blunder, yes, but continues on attacking as if nothing happened and his fierce attack is enough to overcome his 15-year-old opponent. I think it is a perfectly fair game to represent Tal as an attacking player (attacking being the whole point of the list), although the author of the article should have provided some context about this.

@ValMaff

2 жыл бұрын

I don't really think any if that matters when assessing a game or move. It was a bad move, in fact there are few moves worse than it. He was 12, sure, he was attacking, yeah, he won, of course. But you could also show an 800 rated game where 1 player blunders 5 times attacking and stumbles into a checkmate and crown him best attacking player. His attack was not a good attack, it wasn't a good move or a good plan. Just because his opponent blundered more it doesn't give more credit to the bad move. There are much better ways to display good attacks.

@dwd713

2 жыл бұрын

@@ValMaff You read all that and still missed the point.

@Tarrlych

2 жыл бұрын

^ this ^

@Ak-pr1wg

2 жыл бұрын

@@ValMaff Well this blunder master was later the youngest world champion. That is why.. we dont just some 800 player

@Ak-pr1wg

2 жыл бұрын

I have read the book and I remembered he did not like this game. Thanks for you comment

Tal, like Fischer, played human moves. When you play human moves, you blunder sometimes, but only if your opponent catches it. I prefer the older players, pre engine. The engines changed everything. It may be better chess, but it is not that exciting, and is really killing classical chess.

@jpk6916

2 жыл бұрын

So much agreed!

@volfgankamei5348

2 жыл бұрын

Only on the openings, Still the middle game have to be played out on the board.

@jamie49868

2 жыл бұрын

@@volfgankamei5348 Sooner or later, sure. But when you see a totally new line, in say move 7, that player has prepped the heck out the upcoming lines using engines, to not just assist, but show him the moves. That's quite a bit different than when it was pre engine with a book, notation and buddy. I'm amazed they can remember everything, but the best miss moves and blunder all the time. The best of the best just do it a little less...so that hasn't changed.

@sirrismendozasunlessrealms5775

2 жыл бұрын

"Classical chess" was just theory put together on paper. Nothing was lost, to be honest. Things change. Imagine if Chess didn´t evolve.

@achyuththouta6957

2 жыл бұрын

@@jamie49868 There's a reason blitz and bullet chess exist. Beginners generally play classical to understand how the basics but once they understand the basic tactical patterns they don't play classical anymore unless they want to get a title or something

How about Alekhine? He was known for being a brilliantly accurate, yet ruthless attacking player. I think he belongs somewhere in the Top 5.

@dannygjk

2 жыл бұрын

Even modern GMs call Alekhine the father of modern chess not just because of his play but also his approach to chess.

@KarabauPlay

Жыл бұрын

Alekhine plays bluffing moves. But with extreme complexity. Only against capablanca that he changed his style to play like capablanca.

@tenningale

Жыл бұрын

Think Alekhine doesn't get the credit he deserves. Some of his moves seem kind of flaky at first, but Alekhine's depth of calculation set him apart. It's kind of like how you can have Stockfish play a suspect opening against a super-GM but will still crush them in the end. It can just calculate much more deeply. And obviously getting an opponent out of book is a plus if you know what you're doing.

@leagueaddict8357

Жыл бұрын

@@tenningale Nyezhmetdinov doesn't get the credit he deserves, guy couldn't get GM even though he beat all of them.

Bobby Fischer is the greatest player of all time. Today is the era of the engine. There are many games you see where a GM goes through an engine line only to fall apart once he leaves the path.

@thomaskunze266

2 жыл бұрын

@Black Swan55 No wonder His name is "Chad"

@-_Nuke_-

2 жыл бұрын

@Black Swan55 this comment is 100% incorrect

@Feature0311

2 жыл бұрын

@Black Swan55 stop spamming this BS

@dannygjk

2 жыл бұрын

@@henk7747 Magnus indirectly uses engines by playing some moves because they were recommended by an engine. Even Magnus benefits from engines. If Magnus ignored engine recommendations he wouldn't do as well. If any strong player totally ignored engine lines they would do worse than they do.

@jamesshoganbot6085

Жыл бұрын

@@dannygjk agreed. But he can still obviously play at an extremely high level without engines lol. But yeah regardless of all of this, Bobby shouldn’t be considered the greatest just because he was born in a time before engines.

These days I'd be tempted to say Daniil Dubov. He has some crazy attacks.

i think Fischer was so scary even the soviet GMs acknowledged his unmatched dominance! Raul Capablanca was probably the most solid player ever, and Kasparov has to be the one that made chess so refined and entertaining

Well, chess is also a type of sport so there are other factors than just accuracy. You can play for your opponents psychologhy if you can. Apparently Tal managed to do that somehow against great chess players in his era. Yes it seems like he does not stand a chance against todays super GM's like Hikaru, Carlsen, Mamedyarov etc. However, he became the world champion with his unusual attacking strategy. I think these are enough to think that he was just dangerous. Unpredictable people are terrifying to stand against, in everything.

@kramlyn2412

2 жыл бұрын

Maybe tal can stand a chance if he is born the same year carlsen is... And learn from past champs and have a chess engines to evaluate and analyze his games etc. like stockfish.. Btw in his era he is already considered to be a very dangerous tactical chess player without any doubt.. And without the presence of chess engines guides or anything we have right now thats why many people called him a magician i mean that's the difference between his time and our time cuz we are so much advanced right now especially in learning chess.. If he ever exists in our time i doubt carlsen would really can catch up with him(cuz i study most of their games😅)but that's a probability who knows i like both chess players anyways and im not good at comparing them..

@traplover6357

2 жыл бұрын

@@kramlyn2412 I guess in modern times, Tal would be dragged into a positional battle knowing his tactics powress.

@DeuceGenius

2 жыл бұрын

That last sentence nails it

@DeuceGenius

2 жыл бұрын

@@traplover6357 ya who knows if tal grew up with computers. What if Paul Morphy had chess engines to learn from. Who knows. These players were amazing.

@DeuceGenius

2 жыл бұрын

I wouldn't rank tal top 5. Tho he's one of the most unique players of all time

bobby fischer's story is the most tragic story i've ever seen

If I remember well from Tal's book, it is a game he played when in the childhood not when he was at the top level. He did put this game in his book because it was a wrong sacrifice but that he manage to win. Somewhat autoderision ffom the Magician

During the mid to late 1970s, several NHL players were suddenly overcome by the “Philadelphia Flu” according to former Boston Bruin coach, Don Cherry. Players were terrified of stepping onto the ice to face the Philadelphia Flyers. Apparently several players were suddenly afflicted with “Fischer Fever” before facing the mercurial American maverick, RJ Fischer.

Tal was renowned for playing the actual person sitting across from him and exploiting their psyche rather than just playing the board. OTB is a significantly more nuanced game and experience than online play (obvious, but with the unfortunate overwhelming prevalance of Online play nowadays it deserves mention). Tal used this to his advantage, as opposed to someone like Fischer who was more concerned with being pinpoint accurate with every move. There is more than one way to skin a cat. I 100% guarantee that a 2500 today would not play as well sitting right across from Mikhail Tal over an actual chess board than they would playing a random online playing the exact same moves. And they would lose.

Thank you for the video. I didn't understand much but anyway was fun to watch

Chess today is mostly a game of technique and almost anyone can learn technique with correct and sufficient practice. Intuition and creativity on the other hand lie in the realm of genius. That's why Morphy and Tal continue to fascinate. Capablanca and Fischer too.

@dr.bluesfield3629

2 жыл бұрын

well said

Yurtaev, for sure, in this category. Still remember the BCM cover headline: "Yurtaev's incredible Queen sacrifice". I replayed that game was could not make sense of the sacrifice, but was satisfied to learn that neither could a bunch of GMs because truly there was no immediate tactical gain; just a positional attempt and a psychological suckerpunch. Yurtaev - look him up.

What amazed me about Fischer, he could beat the Soviet Chess Method. i.e. He beat teams of players (who were playing 'through' the player Bobby actually faced over the board). One man, against a whole army. And, he often still won!

@SIM2014

2 жыл бұрын

And because of it, he should expect to get paid accordingly as well as acknowledged for the feat. It would have been even better if they were caught RED handed though. 😉

@algar6616

2 жыл бұрын

amen

Tal not only was 12 but even he himself say in his book that going h3 was best. But just as a kid he wanted to try attacks

Their "bad moves" may simply have been intutive moves that exploited their opponents inability to find the right continuation. Precog moves.

The point of the Tal game, to me at least, is to show where his hyper-aggressive (in this case, over-aggressive) style originated. How he was doing it for basically his entire life.

I think Ivanchuk and Shirov should have been AT LEAST "Honorable Mentions".

@maxx_2245

2 жыл бұрын

True. Ivanchuk on his day was an absolute MONSTER

@julesandrewsusvilla4657

2 жыл бұрын

Ivanchuk made Kasparov's bishops one of the most useless pieces in chess history. The bishop was just... there.

@MrSupernova111

2 жыл бұрын

I think the reason Ivanchuk was so deadly is because he has one of the most robust opening repertoire which makes it very difficult to prepare against him. There is a famous game where he pushed Kasparov's pieces into a corner into a position so bad that Kasparov would have probably been glad to give up a piece in exchange for space but he never had time to gain any activity.

they way he see a better line in Tal's game ... dayum

The ending was like having a list of history's greatest martial artists and #1 is some guy with a glock.

God, why do people even play chess still? They're never gonna be as good as the best player ever, AlphaZero.

@sanseverything900

2 жыл бұрын

I for one welcome our robot overlords.

@bigheadrhino

2 жыл бұрын

Practically every person on the planet will never be as good as someone or something else at every single thing they ever do. That’s not a reason not to do any of those things.

@tacobell2009

2 жыл бұрын

@@bigheadrhino /whoosh

@bigheadrhino

2 жыл бұрын

tacobell2009 lol, yeah I realized the sarcasm after I sent it, but you’d be surprised how many people think this way for real.

@DP-ot6zf

2 жыл бұрын

@@sanseverything900 If they're sexy, I'll do more than welcome them.

Anyone who plays me is absolutely lethal.

@DP-ot6zf

2 жыл бұрын

I would take that challenge. I can move a pawn correctly. Most of the time. Assuming I remember which one is a pawn.

you can see the exact moment the disappointment hit him when he saw who was #1

i love how on Mikhail Tal Hikaru didnt see the queen pin after bishop sacrifice and he continued to talk down on Tal 💀

I watch fights. There are boring champions who squeak out technical victories on points and then there are exceptional champions that take their opponents out. Bobby is so exciting for me to watch because he gives himself multiple ways to win- remains fluid- hes hard to plan against because hes not a rigid boring computer. He’s in a league of his own!

Pretty sure the most dangerous chess player was Alexander Pichushkin, Hikaru/editor.

@MetalShadow3142

2 жыл бұрын

just read the wikipedia holy moly

14:23 when Hikaru says "equally sound Caro Kann opening" and goes ummm 😂😂😂 iyk

so taken at face value, your title is correct. tbh i was thinking the same thing. as a true player of the game, Fischer was never really out matched... if we actually play the game, and not just use theory to mindlessly memorize positional advantage, Fischer would win every time, and yes he had a massive wealth of personal experience and memorization himself...

Well, Tal was world champion which u could never be, and saying he was bad, irony.

@nicolasnewcomb8514

2 жыл бұрын

bro relax lmao, he didnt know it was from when Tal was a kid.

hikaru so ahead of his time to the point he somehow clickbaited not only the viewers but himself

Bobby was so good he understood that there is no challenge at his level so now he hates chess. I feel like if he started playing Magnuson and possibly lost to him or was challenged by him perhaps it would spark his love again

@dcoy8666

Жыл бұрын

Dang, it's One Punch Man in real life...

@yessir6427

Жыл бұрын

bro bobby is dead

@GAMESTERVISION

Жыл бұрын

@@yessir6427 yeah that's why I said Bobby WAS so good. not IS... I was speaking of when magnus first hit GM as a little boy. Bobby was old and gray and at the end of his life and very jaded over chess, complaining that computers ruined chess as it went from moves from the heart with deep emotion, to "it's all about memory and memorization of placements".. picking every move with the highest % to perfect as possible... it took the imagination out if it. the algorithms are designed to pick all 100% perfect.. unless throttled off to make it possible for a human to win at any level depending on skill. for any setting skill level under Gm the algorithm actually makes bad and wrong moves on purpose at random..

Frank Marshall was a true terror. Some of his best moves look like typos.

My vote is for the pride and sorrow of chess Paul Morphy. If you asked me a year ago I would have said Fischer. The more I read about Morphy and the more I learn about chess the greater appreciation I have for Morphy

Hikaru: A computer doesn't belong on this list of most dangerous Chess players Alpha Zero: *turns into Skynet* "Who's not the most dangerous now, human?!!"

@DP-ot6zf

2 жыл бұрын

_Format C._ Bye bye.

@josephbishopii6463

2 жыл бұрын

😂🤣😂🤣

Can we officially rename 15 second bullet to ludicrous bullet

Hikaru's reaction on Alpha Zero is so precious.

1. Alpha zero 2. Stockfish 14 3. Stockfish 13 4. Stockfish 12 5. Stockfish 11

@vagnerwanilla785

2 жыл бұрын

I am sure that Stockfish 14 can beat AlphaZero

@ZapOKill

2 жыл бұрын

@@vagnerwanilla785 maybe, but SF14 is not as terrifying as AZ

I just love how Hikaru acknowledges Mamedyarov,and agrees he should be in this list,big ups.

I got jumpscared when the thumbnail appeared on my notification bar!

This is like ranking the best marathon runner of all time and then putting a car on top of it.

"1. e4, best by test!" Fischer - the GOAT!!

@Ricky_Evans1611

Жыл бұрын

Wouldn't he have said "1. P-K4, best by test!"?

@MrSupernova111

11 ай бұрын

@@Ricky_Evans1611 . lol

10:54 Everybody's head is three times the size of Hasan's head! Kappa

_thanks for sharing master! nice one...._

This is like making a list of top 5 fastest sprinters in the world and putting a cheetah at #1

The human computer that was Bobby Fischer. "It can't be reasoned with. It doesn't feel pity, or remorse, or fear. And it absolutely will not stop, ever, until you are dead."

Fischer's physique coupled with his visage and play-to-win attitude was intimidating IMO. With Tal, you fear you would be in the wrong end of a brilliancy. In Kasparov, you would prolly falter due to his attacking style coupled with impeccable preparation, prolly a combo of Fischer and Tal.

Ppl got all nervous when tall played a bad move, thinking its a brilliant move in disguise.

I love how he doesn't go over the computer game. ❤️

I thought tals moves were never really blunders he kind of just messed with his opponents heads

Lots of World Class Chess players and personal friends of Mikail Tal in the comments here ...

Fischer taught the world that self study trumps all

Love your content

Shakh should definitely have been on this list... Alpha Zero? Really?

Keep the list, subtract alpha zero, add Thomas Barnes

Back then no computer

"I'll assume Tal is one" when he can clearly see his name on his screen at number 5.

“These are like 2300 level moves they’re just not good moves” Me: *sad 1900 level noises*

Tal shouldve been first. Mahbe not objectively the "" best "" but very, VERY, scary to play

@lucasmatsuoca

2 жыл бұрын

hell nah, Literally every other player in the list was more dangerous

@dysonsphere2394

2 жыл бұрын

@@lucasmatsuoca If the article is just going to equate overall strength with danger, then it should just be called "Top 5 chess players of all time", but I imagine the author has made such an article before, so they just worded the title slightly and just changed one or two people. A lazy idea for sure. Morphy, Kasparov, and Fischer all belong on the "Top 5 strongest". Alpha Zero as well if we go by the author's bullshit inclusion of computers. Tal is the only play on that list that is dangerous, despite not being one of the strongest of all time.

@lucasmatsuoca

2 жыл бұрын

@@dysonsphere2394 "dangerous" is quite vague, idk how to exactly evaluate this quality, i mean, Karpov was pretty dangerous if you think about it, 1 positional mistake and you're done, is like walking over a line. Magnus also Dangerous, very useless and abstract top 5, with the awful finish of including alpha Go as you said

@dysonsphere2394

2 жыл бұрын

@@lucasmatsuoca Yeah, I'd agree that it's really vague, and 'dangerous' can be defined differently by pretty much everyone. Though yeah, I can see the reasoning in why you'd consider the more tactical players like Karpov do be dangerous as well

@JSamad

2 жыл бұрын

@@lucasmatsuoca you can easily see how dangerous a player is in blitz for example. Tal even flagged Kasparov one month before his death in a blitz game. He built a reputation for playing insane moves, and had both the psychological and tactical skills to back it up.

It’s still amazing to me to able to experience all this with one of the greats himself.

If a dangerous player is one who can always surprise you with unpleasant moves . . . this will happen in general when you are winning or equal. It follows that the best candidates are those who routinely get worse or difficult positions. Then come players who rarely stand worse, but can complicate balanced positions so subtly while keeping the draw in hand that they deliver the death blow while you sleep . . .

6:55 Tal was 13 years old when he played this game in 1949. Karpov was born in 1951. Obviously Karpov would've played better moves, because by his time, chess had evolved a lot. You have to look at things in the context of time. That's like saying "Karpov would've been really bad at chess in 1949, given that he was -2 years old at the time."

@fennecbesixdouze1794

2 жыл бұрын

No, he was 12. He turned 13 later that year. Zilber was 15. Tal writes about this game in his memoirs and says that looking back at it, he doesn't see any compensation at all for the bishop now and doesn't include the game among any great "Tal sacrifices". "Much as I would like to, I cannot place this game in the category of 'intuitive' or 'Tal' sacrifices." "Black has an extra bishop, for which I now do not see any compensation at all. On the other hand, it was not difficult to detect that the black king's pawn cover had been weakened. White continues as if nothing has happened."

Great, fantastic and immortal Bobby Fischer!!! Respect forever!!!

Tal was around 12/13 at that game This game was in the book, he was showing that even he used to play bad. Tal then continued mentioning how he could have played that game better

Hikaru roasting games back from 1949

Tal had the recod for the longest undefeated streak in competive games ( I think Carlsen broke it ) So Nakamura may doubt the quality of his games, but is hard to argue with such a record. In his era he was a monster.

@TheAluvisify

Жыл бұрын

Ding actually broke it first, then Magnus broke Ding's record.

@cristiangamboa2037

Жыл бұрын

@@TheAluvisify thanks I didn't know Ding had it first

@teodorul9280

Жыл бұрын

no, actually Bobby Ficher broke that win streak more than 50 years ago, so it his record haven't lasted for so long but i get your point

@cristiangamboa2037

Жыл бұрын

@@teodorul9280 I just looked it up and all I found says It was Ding who broke it, but as you said I think you get my point, he was a strong consistent player, a giant of his era.

@teodorul9280

Жыл бұрын

@@cristiangamboa2037 You're probably right, the longest win streak is accorded to Fischer (With 20 consecutive wins) but the longest undefeated streak (which can mean wins and draws) was Tal - Ding - Magnus.

Morphy could only beat the players infront of him. Im confident that if we picked up an 18 year old Morphy and brought him to 2021, showed him how to use a computer and gave him a year, he would at least give Magnus a run for his money.

@MrSupernova111

2 жыл бұрын

Morphy is easily the most talented chess player ever. Its unimaginable how much more he could have accomplished with more dedication to chess and especially with today's resources.

@mrfreeandclear970

2 жыл бұрын

Morphy would dog-walk Magnus with computers and the benefit of 200 years of chess study.

@vibovitold

Жыл бұрын

assuming that this 18 years old Morphy would even WANT to spend countless hours at this computer, memorizing decades of opening theory in order to catch up with Magnus, rather than walk out and see the bizarre world of the 2020s he was a human being, not some chess robot

@viveknamikaze761

Жыл бұрын

@@mrfreeandclear970 This is Magnus we are talking about.... Not some scrub.

the plot twist was incredible

This artical induces an almost parent-like amount of emotional damage