Correction: According to the original text, Rama actually got extremely raged when the Sea-God did not appear despite his 3 day-long worship dedicated to the god. Then Rama decided to drain the whole sea with his divine arrow and warned the sea-god accordingly. Out of aghast, the sea-god appeared at last and suggested ways to cross the sea. This dramatic chapter is called 'Samudra-Shasana' (A lesson to the sea).

@siddhanthkamath321

Жыл бұрын

Yes.. And i think this was somewhat depicted in the Hanuman animated movie Released around 14 years ago

@venkatramannayak6062

Жыл бұрын

And in aadipurush lord hanuman says kapda tel aag tere baap ki.. jakegi bhi tere baap ki..

@manas9194

Жыл бұрын

binti na mane jaladhi jad, gae teen din beet, bole Ram sakope tab, bhay bin hoe na preet

@rishavraj6973

Жыл бұрын

​@@venkatramannayak6062what a stupid tapori dialogue

@TriedRefusedProductions

Жыл бұрын

Thank you for the correction

Now we know "why Katappa killed bahubali..." He traveled to the future and saw Adipurush!!

@yashv8199

Жыл бұрын

haha

@shishirjain3562

Жыл бұрын

good one😅😅

@bhargavipba

Жыл бұрын

Oh god 🤣🤣🤣🤣

@anukshyarath3069

Жыл бұрын

This makes more sense now... 🤣

@aruneshnandan6759

Жыл бұрын

So true😂

Aamir khan had said "Mahabharata or Ramayana might not let you down but you might let Mahabharata or Ramayana down" He was absolutely correct 💯

@theman-wq1jt

Жыл бұрын

Don't take amir's name bro bhakts might bycott you😂

@neerajbaviskar305

Жыл бұрын

Because he knew after LSC that bollywood is incapable of adapting source material properly. Its always a significant downgraden except Kaante.

@cinephile4699

Жыл бұрын

Bollywood is fucking in capable of bringing good movies to the big screen. But these same bollywood releases some good movies and series in digital platforms.💯💯 Why is bollywood like this 😶

@anubhav7547

Жыл бұрын

Yes because these are beyond Bollywood's level of making movies. Only Tollywood should try on these topics 🙏❤️

@ayushkaushik6885

Жыл бұрын

@@theman-wq1jt bhakt's?? Y not jihadi's ??? Are you targeting single religion

I have a newfound appreciation for the people that do Ram Leela every year in my society. They do 1000 times more justice to Ramayan with their budget props than Adipurush did with such a huge budget.

@Kathakathan11

Жыл бұрын

Never miss that, we had that tradition and they would hire the school ground, but Muslims protested and then it has stopped, now we just have temple readings. 😢 as long as you can watch ram Leela, don’t miss it.

@AnotherNPC1234

Жыл бұрын

@@Kathakathan11 which city is this?

@daphne3631

Жыл бұрын

True that

@darshandesai6061

Жыл бұрын

​@Sayonara44373 where did this happen?

@darshandesai6061

Жыл бұрын

Now that I come to think of it ..

The absolute hypocrisy is when Deepika wore a saffron colored dress for 10 seconds in a 3 mins long song in a 3 hrs long movie the whole media went crazy saying it's an insult to our hindu culture, but now when Adipurush is clearly an insult to our faiths and beliefs about our Ramayan nobody is saying to boycott this movie, is this a joke

@AnotherNPC1234

Жыл бұрын

That sucker Arnab Goswami was defending this movie with #HinduAwakening. Idiot was literally shoving down the movie down the throats of Hindus

@tvaddict6491

Жыл бұрын

The movie I believe is backed by some figures in high places. The credits in the movie apparently thanks them. That should answer your question. All this proves is that audience is always king, no matter what garbage people in politics or movie industry shells out. The audience is smart and knows what to watch

@sheldon3842

Жыл бұрын

People are dumb and uneducated

@ushas7255

11 ай бұрын

I agree... I am not religious but a spiritual person. Even I feel offended looking at how Lord Ram is portrayed! Seriously why wasn't this portrayal stopped by people.

Yugo Sako travelled to India over 60 times and devoted 10 years of his life to research for animated Ramayan, I would love to know what Om Raut did.

@pr00009

Жыл бұрын

Om raut played temple run and liked its animation

@lalisaslittlewifey6840

Жыл бұрын

That moron just acted a crying scene asking to keep seats for Hanuman ji in the theaters. Hanumanji would feel humiliated to see himself depicted like this!

@rishann

Жыл бұрын

Om raut complained why he had to listen bhajans during festivals and made movie just to cash in the sentiments

@thatgurl3126

Жыл бұрын

Googled 😂

@fahds2583

Жыл бұрын

@@pr00009 😂😂😂😂

Moral of the story---Sometimes you can judge a book by its cover.

@sreenivaskamath4243

Жыл бұрын

Yeah, this does apply here 😅

@paxonite-7bd5

Жыл бұрын

There was no cover because this was a third hand book 😂

@nikolatesla399

Жыл бұрын

​@@paxonite-7bd5😂😂😂

@shishya085

Жыл бұрын

🤣🙂

@ishanpaul4672

Жыл бұрын

True

As a Muslim kid, my curiosity about the various Hindu legends and stories peaked after watching Yugo Sako's animated Ramayana. Good stories draw people in like moths to a flame regardless of faith and beliefs.

@divyansh2890

Жыл бұрын

Come on bruh, everyone's default settings is Hindu on the indian subcontinent

@mikanjjj6357

Жыл бұрын

Very true!

@apoorvverma574

Жыл бұрын

@@divyansh2890 you are a very disturbed person.

@tiger3091

Жыл бұрын

​@@apoorvverma574why? He stated a fact. Teri jali kyun?

@kaustubhkotkar3597

Жыл бұрын

​@@apoorvverma574 tu angrejo ki chatne wala lag raha hai

I’m a Christian but I remember watching and rewatching the animated ramayana on Cartoon Network every time it aired but now I’m shocked how that movie managed to pack so much story and lore in 2 hours they should re release that movie intstead of this I would happily watch it it’s so beautiful!

@Inkipinkiponkey-c9o

Жыл бұрын

yes❤

@graceebenezer6085

Жыл бұрын

Same, I always sat to watch the movie no matter what.

@Its_BM

Жыл бұрын

I think there is a remastered version coming or have released already.

@saumyapathak5865

Жыл бұрын

​@@Its_BMI wonder how effective the patch work will be!

@duality4453

Жыл бұрын

Exactly even in a Christian household I used to heartily enjoy Ghototkach, Krishna Animated series, The Hanuman movie etc. I knew Adipurush won't hold up their legacy soon as I saw Prabhas's Raavan like stature and look for the role of Ram and almost childish look of Hanuman, we all literally used to hold air inside the mouth to mimick Hanuman like this

Those who are defending Prabhas must understand that lead actors in this country always possess some kind of creative control over the film. And there's no way he couldn't have known that a bullsh!t was being made instead of Ramayan

@AniruddhD

Жыл бұрын

So S.S Rajamoauli did things in Bahubali as Prabhas dictated?

@PaulAllen6304

Жыл бұрын

Exactly. He took 120 crores(1/5th of the budget) but had no creative control? Those who believe that should go back to school

@amithabv1060

Жыл бұрын

​@@AniruddhD he could've given his inputs about how crappy the product being developed was.

@dishwasher69

Жыл бұрын

​@@AniruddhDmaybe because bahubali was perfect and wasn't bullshit

@Anuj111ify

Жыл бұрын

This film shot with motion capturing technology.. who knows director would have said everything will be fix in vfx..

A seat was left out for Hanuman ji in the theatres. Let's hope he doesn't see the movie because if he does , Lanka won't be the only thing burned down by him😂.

@ManushriAnand

Жыл бұрын

Lol😂

@Farhan-Dabhoi

Жыл бұрын

😂😂😂😂😂😂

@seemonjena659

Жыл бұрын

Totally in love this comment🤣🤣🤣

@sheldor523

Жыл бұрын

ye badiya tha guru

@janardhanat6030

Жыл бұрын

Awesome 😁🤪

Don't get me wrong here, but I think Pravas would look perfect as Ravan in Ramayan. His face card could match all the characteristics if he can act and portray it well enough.

@daphne3631

Жыл бұрын

That's something to think about.

@Vk-sk7nm

Жыл бұрын

Obviously. Both of them having Dravidian genetics.

@lordblanck7923

Жыл бұрын

Nah he looks like a fierce person by face. Ram was almost a beautiful person with hints of manliness on his face. This one looks like he is gonna explode in a second

@mcmohitchauhan21

Жыл бұрын

Yes, Prabhas would have been much better for the role of Ravana. I think, Hrithik would have been an awesome choice for Lord Ram, though

@Anayaah421

Жыл бұрын

​@@mcmohitchauhan21Hrithik is very expressive. Ram was a very gentle character. Maybe Shahid Kapoor? (In his Vivah/ Jab We met character profile)

It's amazing to see how a 1992 Animation film with the budget of less than INR 1Cr (0.67 crores to be precise) by Ghibli studio gives competition to a 2023 film with a budget of 700 crore, and still wins without a question. Goodness prevails!

It’s ridiculous how they are now shamelessly justifying the dialogues and looks of the characters. They even said that it is just ‘heavily inspired’ from Ramayana but not the actual Ramayana..after promoting so much as a Ramayana story..so much so that they ended up reserving a seat for Lord Hanuman..how disgusting is that!

@TriedRefusedProductions

Жыл бұрын

The back tracking and the blatant contradiction just in the matter of a few weeks is shocking

@rajthakkar9500

Жыл бұрын

Audience is even more disgusting i mean they only left a seat for Lord Hanuman but audience is leaving whole theatre empty as a tribute!!!😑😅

@ananditachauhan5285

Жыл бұрын

​@@TriedRefusedProductions I dont think so. If u see carefully the movie is called adipurush and not ramayan. Ram was called raghav, lakshman as setu, sita as janki, raavan as lankesh and hanuman as bajrang. So ofcourse at the script stage itself, makers had that intent and its not a 180 degree turn that u r saying.The intent was to create an adaptation based on Ramayan..otherwise instead of naming it as adipurush they would have named the film directly as Ramayan. Also u need to stop comparing films!!!!!! This movie starts from sita apharan. So why are u talking about bharath, dashrath, ayodhya when the starting point of the film is different ? U seem to be giving avery redundant explanation when u r accusing them of not showing the backstory. How much can u club in a 3 hr movie? Didnt u see how Ram refused to kill the demon who came as vibheeshan, how he chose to be on Sugriv's side even though Lakshman said that Bali is stronger, how he held cremation of jatayu giving him a respectful goodbye, how he told vibheeshan that he need not be on Ram's side and can choose to be neutral, when he said for him maryada is far more imoortant and thats why he wont take Ayodha's military help. So many things are shown in the film which talk about ram's character..and u didnt get Ram? The makers clearly put up a disclaimer that they changed the screenplay a bit and isnt 100% factual..so why are we stuck on costumes,hairstyles etc? U r literally doing scene by scene comparison of anime ramayan and adipurush. Why are u butchering the film like that. Yes i know 4 to 5 dialogues were very bad but u cant potray as if nothing more to the film's credit. The Jai Shree Ram BGM was epic. U people are clinging to 4 to 5 dialogues and are forgetting every other dialogue like the speech ram gave to vanar sena U said ram's dichotomy about bloodshed wasnt explored? Didnt u hear the promise prabhas made to vibheeshan in the movie that he will not damage Lanka as its Raavan's fault. I mean u can let go off the physics defying horrible train sequence on pathaan, u can let go off how far pathaan is afar from reality where they show an ex RAW agent bad and an ISI agent girl good but u cant digest the creative liberties filmmakers took with the costume kf Raavan and literally just 4 to 5 dialogues on finger count which were cringe? I didnt see the same microscopic criticism for pathaan from u

@sharathwho4927

Жыл бұрын

@@ananditachauhan5285 amusing to see someone defend all of it.. 😂

@ananditachauhan5285

Жыл бұрын

@@sharathwho4927 but what wrong did i say? Werent those scenes that i said a part of the movie. I fail to understand how people who are catching 4 to 5 dialogues that dont come for more than one minute in the film are conveniently ignoring all the scenes that i mentioned. I found Jammy to be very biased on this video. The leniency shown for films like pathaan seems to be missing here

Prabhas has made one point very clear with his last 3 movies: don't expect too much. Right after Bahubali, audience thought a star is born, but the reality is a star is fading.

@erenbritania2117

Жыл бұрын

Only saalar

@snehalkhatri9357

Жыл бұрын

@@erenbritania2117 Crap

@1ne7evN

Жыл бұрын

ok drink some sambaar and sleep

@anandthethriller4362

Жыл бұрын

Dude brought 140crs opening with this one.

@sukanyakalita7263

Жыл бұрын

@@anandthethriller4362opening acchi hone se movie acchi nahi ho jati. Movie dekhna toh jaenge hi. Uske baad hi toh pata chalega movie acchi hain ya buri. Aur adipurush jaisi bakwas movie aaj tak kisina nahi banayi hogi. Aur prabhas jaisa kharab acting kisine ne kiya hoga.

The fact that Manoj Muntashir and Prabhas both have been integral part of Bahubali and Adipurush but it's the director/creator and his vision which makes it a success or a failure. My respect for Rajamouli has levelled up so much . He did not change his vision for the youth and made a Marvel movie out of it instead New Gen adored him for his perspective and story telling. Thats why he is where he is.

NOBODY might believe this, but the old movie "sree rama rajyam" made by balayya is on actually another level with the detailings, the gorgeousness of nayanatara as sita is unmatchable

@pranathirkovvuri1087

Жыл бұрын

Back then I was furious that they changed the storyline and brought in Hanuman to assist Sita in the ashram but omg that is so much more better than whatever this Adipurush was....

@JasthiCS

Жыл бұрын

It was Bapu. Be made Seeta kalyanam and Sampurna ramayanam. That Gangavataranam song is ❤🔥

rajamouli sir once said " i fear to make mahabharata (he literally and definitely meant all cultural preciouss including The epic❤️ ) i feel if anything went wrong before the audience even i wont be able to forgive myself" edit- that braketed sentence

@aashikasharma1616

Жыл бұрын

But om raut is shameless

@whentheimposterissus8376

Жыл бұрын

Trust me bro. Only he could have done justice to our Ramayana🙏 and Mahabharatam🙏.

@whentheimposterissus8376

Жыл бұрын

I know Alluri SitaRam Raju used to wear Shree Ram's🙏 Vanvasi Look while fighting with colonisers . But When Ram Charan came on the screen as Vanvasi Shree Ram🙏 , I literally cried like a baby. He looked beautiful, majestic, godly and Royal.

@rinagajjar5016

Жыл бұрын

​@@aashikasharma1616yeh to rakshso bhi jyada Gaye guzare hai

@cricmasti8416

Жыл бұрын

@@aashikasharma1616 yes he is shameless along with manoj muntashir .as they are justifying this nonsense they made.

The Legend of Prince Rama by the Japanese animator Yugo Sako released in 1993 still remains my most favourite mainly because I grew up watching that. Loads of childhood nostalgia associated with it. Never gonna ruin my experience with this one.

@TriedRefusedProductions

Жыл бұрын

You know what’s crazy: if they adapted the same screenplay in the live action format: it would have worked wonders!

@COHOPDey

Жыл бұрын

I hope they release this in India. But I have full faith on T series that they won't let this happen.

@petyrparker

Жыл бұрын

I watched it again yesterday to cleanse my eyes 😊

@poojasikdar3583

Жыл бұрын

​@@TriedRefusedProductionsagreed!

@drkrkshubh66

Жыл бұрын

The legend of prince rama was gem ❤❤❤❤

I am deeply shocked to learn that a person like Manoj Muntashir wrote such cringy dialogues of the movie. Man, this man looks so learned and present himself with utmost grace. It is really hard to believe that he carries this level of thought process and yes after facing the backlash, he is just giving justification for the shit he has done.

@venkatramannayak6062

Жыл бұрын

No no he wrote so tat today's kids could relate it... and when today's kids grow up they will have the same language control etc too... and how they will justify??? Kids will say hanuman ji bhi vaise bolte the to hum kyu na bole???

@RR_theproahole

Жыл бұрын

He got too swept away with his popularity and lost control over himself and wrote whatever first came to his head but he forgot that when you are appealing to sentiments of people, you're handling a double edged sword, a small mistake and you will cut yourself.

@vaibhavprakash4487

Жыл бұрын

@@RR_theproahole Irony is that he refused to acknowledge his mistake. He definitely is very well learned person but what he did is really indigestible. Overall, the movie is a complete disaster given the fact that it has been made with a budget of 600 cr.

@Its_BM

Жыл бұрын

Usko sirf Urdu words use karna aata he. Ispe toh nahi karsakte isiliye bakchodi bhare words bhardiya

@saumyapathak5865

Жыл бұрын

​@@venkatramannayak6062exactly. If this is his argument the the tewm should have used proper shudh hindi dialogues even more to enculvute good language skill among the childern. Such tapori lingua is definitely not something we would want our children to use.

So glad that this movie is getting the deserved criticism from more than 95% of the reviewers instead of a diplomatic approach. Time to call spade a spade especially when the movie makers set a wrong pretense during the promotion.

I'm convinced that Om Raut did not make Tanhaji... It was 100% ghost directed by Ajay Devgn I refuse to believe the same director made both these movies Edit : I'm nowhere saying Tanhaji is some masterpiece of filmmaking 😂 but compared to this shite, Tanhaji feels like LOTR

@abhishekdarjee7069

Жыл бұрын

Lmao

@TriedRefusedProductions

Жыл бұрын

A lot of people are claiming Devgn having ghost directed the film 👀

@thethreespikes9737

Жыл бұрын

Action in that is evident that its shadow directed by Ajay Devgan

@anandraghuvanshi3208

Жыл бұрын

Yes obviously om raut might have acted like an assistant.. Sitting behind camera when devgn is pe performing scenes

@blueblessingmoon3421

Жыл бұрын

Finally someone said it.Thank you for saying this.The thing i have been saying for a while.

4:25 - I actually feel they need 7 parts to do complete justice to the Ramayana. There are 7 khand in Ramayan so I think, we will be needing atleast 7 movies(as movie format) to showcase the story of Ramayana(even if we exclude Bala khand and Uttar khand) where all major charcters can have their own arcs(even if little) 1. Ayodhya Kand 2. Aranya Kand 3. Kisiskhindha Kand 4. A full movie dedicated to Ravan,his rise and his kingdom 5. Sundar kand 6. Yudha Kand Part 1 7. Yudh Kand Part 2 See,As Movie parts- 1.Ayodhya Kand - Covering the poltics of Kosala(manthra-kaikeyi),Ram ji accompanying Vishawamitra to kill the rakshahs(Tadka) and then Ram ji going to swayamwar and then Ram and Sita marriage Due to politics Ram ji sent for vanvash and the climax ends with Bharat-Milap Total family drama kind of part 1 2.Aranaya Kand Here we will see Ram ji meeting Sabri,some sages and his life in vanvash Suparnkha attacks Sita ji,Laksham retaliates Suparnkha brothers Khar-Dushan attacks Ram ji and Ram ji wins Then in the end Ravan with marichi help kidnaps Sita and movie ends 3. Kiskindha kand Starts with Jatyu sacrifice told in flashback kind Many charcters Sugriva,bali,jamvanth,Hanuman ji and Angad are introduced Ram ji helps Sugriva taking back the kingdom(where a brief civil war will be seen) and then movie ends with Vanars sent across the globe to search for Sita ji 4. Lanka kand(named by me) Here Ravan and family and his rise to power is shown Like a prequel showcasing Ravan's past war campaigns 5. Sundar Kand The main protagonist is Hanuman ji The full movie covers Hanuman ji journey where He searches for Sita ji, foughts multiple rakshahs and ends with Hanuman ji giving ring to Sita ji,killing akshaykumar and burning Lanka to ashes Hanuman ji takes this information to Ram ji and Ram Setu built in the end(within a song) 6. Yudh Kand Part 1 Angad is sent for sandhi but Ravan refuses and war starts Kumbhkaran will be main antagonist (with other mini villains are Ravan sons) Movie ends with meghnath appearing in last 5 minutes and mortally wounding Ram-Lakshaman with NagPash 7. Yudh Kand Part 2 Hanuman ji brings Garuda and then fight with Meghanath begins again with Meghnath harming Lakshman ji yet again and Hanuman is bringing Sanjeevani In interval scene - Lakshman ji kills Meghnath And then final battle between Ravan and Ram ji takes place And after 5 parts Ram-Sita unites

@santoshraysr9943

Жыл бұрын

👍👍👍

@kashutosh9132

Жыл бұрын

And my Dream Cast will be - 1. Ram - Ranbir(or Abhishek Chauhan from asur) 2. Lakshman - Aditya(or Vishesh Bansal if Abhishek Chauhan is Ram) Others casting is accordance with Ranbir and Aditya Kapoor. 3. Bharat - Arjun Bijlani 4. Starughana - Gurfateh 5. Seeta - Alia(after seeing her role in RRR) 6. Hanuman - NTR as Human ji is protagonist of Sundar Kand 7. Dashrath - Gajraj Rao 8. Koushalaya - Neena Gupta 9. Kekayi - Sushmita 10.Janak - Darshan Jariwala 11. Vishwamitra - Neeraj Kabi 12. Prahshuram - Sharad Kelkar 13. Manthra - Tilotama shome 14. Marich - Raghubir Yadav 15. Jatayu - Anil Charanjeet 16. Suparnkha - Rasika Duggal 17. Ravan - Ajay Devgn 18. Jamvanth - Sourabh Shukla 19. Nal - Neel - Sidhhant Nigam & Abhishek Nigam 20. Bali & Sugriva - Rajeev Khandelwal 21. Angad - Sidhaant Chaturvedi 22. Khar - dushan - Nikitin Dheer and Arya Babbar 23. AksayKumar - Shiv Pandit 24. Meghnath - Ranveer Singh 25. Vibhisan - Pankaj Tripathi 25. Kumbhkaran - SRK VFX SRK will be cool to see🙈 26. Atikaya - 27. Narantaka & Devantaka - 28. Mandodari - Shriya Saran all sons, brother of Ravan should be casted and showcased in film as in end all his family members (male) die except vibhisan So that we can see character arc of Ravan also Also it would be nice if we cast young actors for role of Ram and his brothers and Sita. Like actors in age group of Siddharth Nigam or Vishesh Bansal(from asur). I would love to to see Vishesh as Lakshman and his older counter part in asur as Ram(as the guy has the calmness on his face). - if forces of market allows. Bcuz ram ji was just 16 when he was sent to vanvash so it make sense for younger actors

@lostgirl4932

Жыл бұрын

Dude this would have broken all the records and created a history. They had a huge opportunity on a silver platter and still didn't make use of it.

@seemonjena659

Жыл бұрын

Man it seems it would have been better if you had directed Adipurush! Your knowledge of Ramayan is explicitly evident from the fact that you have beautifully divided the epic into perfect parts! If only Om Raut had .1% of your sensibility maybe this movie would not have been the most disastrous movie ever in Indian cinema.

@gulabjamun6897

Жыл бұрын

Yes Good.

They made such a joke out of such an iconic epic of our history. It makes my heart break how bollywood always tries to hurt the sentiments of our culture. This movie can never be justified no matter what the creators say.

I've always believed that to properly adapt the Ramayana to the big screen, the effort should be akin to the Production of "The Lord of The Rings" by Peter Jackson. Such an epic cannot be taken lightly.

Now that Japanese anime films like Suzume are released in theaters and received massive indian audience I wish if there was a way they could re-release animated Ramayana for everyone to see on the big screenns or on the OTT platforms

@taigafgo

Жыл бұрын

I wish Animax would be back in India. Greedy Sony took away my fav channel for useless kids channel

@adnankhan-hn8yy

Жыл бұрын

You can expect only a cheap make of that …..This is Bollywood there is no logic

@nickarvas9566

Жыл бұрын

4k remastered version of the movie is being released on Netflix soon

@youdontknowme2913

Жыл бұрын

They will try to boycott it instead lol

@spellcheck5393

Жыл бұрын

Suzume❤ I want them to show hayao Miyazaki also esp howls moving castle😍

I can bet that old animated Ramayan will get more audience in theatres than current Adipurush

@dontmesswithme2120

Жыл бұрын

Waste prabhas...his time in the industry is over...its better he retires instead of making these kindof trash films🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

@shrutik9673

Жыл бұрын

Yoo chalega

@dontmesswithme2120

Жыл бұрын

@@shrutik9673 pove mullam pandi lanja🤣🤣🤣prabhas muslodi blind fan🤣🤣🤣🤣

@barsha362

Жыл бұрын

We should start a petition for re-release of the old animated Ramayana in India. That movie deserves appreciation which it didn't get in its time

@mcmohitchauhan21

Жыл бұрын

The animated Ramayana was well made. A delight to watch.

I watched siya ke ram aired on star plus and Ashish Sharma as Ram and Madrakshi Mundle as Sita still remain one of the best potrayals.. Ashish Sharma's calm and kind demeanor as Ram and Madrakshi as the strong and Resleint sita still feels fresh to me and hits close to home

@tvaddict6491

Жыл бұрын

TBH Ashish Sharma is absolutely the right casting for Lord Ram on tv within the current lot of actors present. He has the face and he has the genteel demeanour down pat!

Growing up the animated version of ramayan was my favorite movie... just watching its clips now in your video made me recall why I loved it so much... it was perfect❤

This is what I found when I searched for the animated movie - In 1983, while working on "The Ramayana Relics" a documentary film about excavations by Dr. B. B. Lal near Allahabad in Uttar Pradesh (India) Yugo Sako came to know about the story of Ramayana. He liked the story of the Ramayana so much that he researched deeper into the topic and went on to read 10 versions of the Ramayana in Japanese. After reading the Ramayana he wanted to adapt it into animation as he didn't think a live-action movie could capture the true essence of Ramayana, "Because Ram is God, I felt it was best to depict him in animation, rather than by an actor." TEM Co., Ltd. financed the production and a new production studio Nippon Ramayana Film Co., Ltd. was set up and the principal animation of the film began in 1990 with 450 artists on board. Indian animators guided their Japanese teammates with Indian customs and traditions depicted in the film like how dhotis are worn and how the children receive blessings from their elders. . He researched so much before making the movie and he was an outsider with little to no knowledge about Ramayan. Yet a guy from India who grew up with the story botched it. I'm glad I did not watch this!

@debanjanaroy7911

Жыл бұрын

where can i watch this animated ramayan ?

@FireCat14

Жыл бұрын

@@debanjanaroy7911 it's on KZread

@dontmesswithme2120

Жыл бұрын

Waste prabhas...his time in the industry is over...its better he retires instead of making these kindof trash films🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

@__rmk__9360

Жыл бұрын

Thank you for sharing this! I am intrigued to watch Yugo Sako's animated version again to refresh my memories.

@FireCat14

Жыл бұрын

@@studyhard9870 I decided to not watch the movie the moment I saw the teaser not because of someone's review!

I was in the theatre yesterday, and a family with children was sitting beside me. The parents were truly disappointed, as they came thinking their children will learn about the epic.

Your each and every word is so accurate . This is why i love watching your review videos as you calmly thrash the films without any cussing or shouting. You have very accurately depicted what one felt while watching this joke which they call an adaption of the great epic Ramayan.

This looks like Raavan is reborn as Om Raut and taking his due vengeance on ramayan en mass. As a Srilankan, I really can't complain though 😂

@_kartik_chauhan

Жыл бұрын

Sri Lankan?😮

@Sleepyken900

Жыл бұрын

@@_kartik_chauhan I'm

@_kartik_chauhan

Жыл бұрын

@@Sleepyken900 Sinhala ?

@user-vm5jb8db2q

Жыл бұрын

Srilankan 🤢🤮

@DarkMasterEdits-Mashups

Жыл бұрын

Bro means kuch bhi You are talking non sense How lankesh raavan will show his golden lanka as coal lanka And having look of chapri Even if ravan was alive after watching this movie he will commit suicide

You spoke my mind. Ramayana is not only limited to the characteristics and greatness of Shri Ram, but also the others. His brothers' (not only Lakshman, but also Bharat and Shatrughn) loyalty towards him is an excellent example to teach the new and future generations about family bonds and brotherly love, especially in an age where we see many siblings at each others throats just for property and wealth. Mata Sita, despite being someone who didn't participate in physical fights, was strong and resilient enough to protect her honor. Not once did she lose hope or give in to Ravan's threats, even when he threatened to kill her. Hanuman is the epitome of unconditional, innocent, and limitless devotion. Infact, there is a lot to learn from Ravan also. A wise, intellectual man he was, not just a psycho villian. Ravan is the representation of how lust, arrogance, overconfidence can destroy even the wisest of all minds. Shri Ram teaches us about selflessness, respect towards our elders, humility, how to remain calm even in the face of adversity, how to be fierce but level-headed at all times. Adipurush seems to be only about villian kidnaps the heorine, hero saves her. The essence of Ramayan and its characters is missed.

@susmitakerketta8937

Жыл бұрын

Truly they depicted ravan as just a villain he was one of the wisest 🤦‍♀️it has become a hero heroin n villan

@lifegamerpro4033

Жыл бұрын

Ramayan Moral...if one needs power simple create a vanar sena....

@dontmesswithme2120

Жыл бұрын

Prabhas career drowning lol🤣🤣🤣His time in the industry is over...its better he retires instead of making these kindof trash films🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

@AdamLevine-hs4wl

Жыл бұрын

#boycott om raut.

@satanswifey_

Жыл бұрын

Truly. And Ravan was a gyaani and devotee of Lord Shiva, wise and strategic. Here he is just thoughtlessly evil, where his original intentions for avenging his sister Surpnakha's honor is lost. Lord Ram wasn't aware of the way of how to defeat him and on a losing battle, where Vibhishan told him how to defeat Ravan, which is just completely tossed out of the movie.

The animated Ramayan is my most favorite depiction of the stories and characters of Ramayana so far. I'm disappointed how some people with lack of creativity and originality keep trying to ruin beautiful things 🥲

Hey jammy the fact that i remembered the edit and i watched it when it first came out it makes me sort of OG

Kumbhkarna's son fight against Sugreev, neel, hanuman and the vanar sena were one of my favorite moments in the Legend of the prince rama movie. I can't believe they skipped it totally.

@youdontknowme2913

Жыл бұрын

Neel was total wack in that movie, they showed how much of a skillful fighter he is at times same how young and inexperienced he was. I totally loved his portrayal in the Yugo Sako movie.

@cricmasti8416

Жыл бұрын

After Ramanand Sagar's Ramayan , the Legend of the prince rama is the best version of Ramayan. let's forget the movie adipurush even exists.

@engineeredangle

Жыл бұрын

Bro it's good they skipped that part

@TriedRefusedProductions

Жыл бұрын

IKR and it built up to the ultimate big fights against Indrajith and Kumbhkaran so well!

@gkscharlie6826

Жыл бұрын

They didn't even provide importance to nal and neel. They were literally the engineers of the ram setu. And they were just like some random monkeys here

They had a chance to create a ramverse 1. The legend of Hanuman 2. Ravaan the demon king 3. Adipurush( ends on vanvaas) 4. Ramayan chapter 1 ( ends on ram setu ) 5. Ramayan chapter 2 ( the final battle )

@fatimahfilms.

Жыл бұрын

I was literally thinking the same thing.

Ramayana story starts way early when Dasharath kills Shravana which is a preface for the situation to build up. Or could have gone back as long as Ravana conqurered all the three realms. Or could have gone back when Jaya and Vijaya were cursed in Vaikunta. After Jatayu's death, Rama kills Kabandha (a cursed Gandharva). Gandharva on attaining his original form, thanks and guides Rama towards Shabari's ashram. And Shabari's devotion towards Ram is a gem in Ramayana. Shabari then guiding Rama towards Kishkinda. Hanuman meeting Ram in a Brahmin's costume is a beautiful sequence on its own. In reality Ravana had asked boon that he should not be killed by any Gods, thus Rama is portrayed as normal man in the Ramayana. He lived as a normal man, took help of Vanara sena to glorify his devotees. Several questions arise when Bali is killed by Rama hiding behind tree. Even Bali raises all these questions. And I must say Ramanand Sagar's Ramayan beautifully uphold the Ram's character while answering these questions. One will understand the values followed by the living beings of those times. I would say they could have easily made 4 to 5 parts of the series with such a budget. Truth is Ram's character is so complex that actor needs to get himself immersed into the mindset of Ram which I believe only Ram can do. Even Lakshman's character is of devotion towards Ram and Sita. When Ram asks if these bangles are of Sita, Lakshman can not recognize.. but he does recognize the ring of her feet. Baharath's love for Ram is nothing like it. Bharath was in a distant land when Ram was sent to forest. He comes running to get his brother back. Its like sould leaving the body for him. He runs his kingdom by not sitting on the King's throne as he thinks it belongs to Ram. Even when Ram comes back from Vanwas, he doesn't want to go to Ayodhya and take the kingdom back from Bharath. He tells Hanuman to go and tell Bharath about His arrival. If Hanuman notices any sign of Bharath wanting to keep the kingdom he should reveal it to Ram, so that Ram will not take over the kingdom. But on hearing Ram's arrival, Bharath runs to wherever Ram is with teary eye. This classic could only be produced (even not in detail) once by Sri. Ramananda Sagarji. And with that people touch Sri Arun Govil's feet for doing justice to that character.

so well explained - "Unnecessary Need to Move Forward" these words says a lot

After the release of "Thugs of Hindustan" critics said what will get more disappointing than this movie where the cast includes Aamir Khan and Amitabh Bachchan and still has a underwhelming storytelling, and then Adipurush arrives with ticking all the boxes to surpass TOH with adding more boxes of bizzareness, atleast TOH had well choreographed action set pieces and some scenes stood out positively.

@bhargavipba

Жыл бұрын

Also TOH was completely fictionalized. Adipurush's entire PR machinary was dedicated to making it an adaptation of Ramayan and used religion to promote the film. It's disgusting.

@kashutosh9132

Жыл бұрын

Plus Aamir issued a apology in front of public in press conference when he was informed people are disliking this. On the opposite,Manoj muntasir is blaming audience.

@dontmesswithme2120

Жыл бұрын

Waste prabhas...his time in the industry is over...its better he retires instead of making these kindof trash films🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

@chetanuniyal3428

Жыл бұрын

True, I might be In the minority but i really liked parts of that movie. Every character had an arc and the mass moments worked for me on big screen.

@daphne3631

Жыл бұрын

True. I developed a headache while watching Thugs of Hindostan. I decided that nothing could be worse than this. But then came Saaho and now this

Tumbbad budget is just 0.7% of Adipurush's budget. That's all I want to say about the film. As you were explaining about the movie, I am glad that you have showed images of our childhood "Ramayan : The legend of prince rama" movie. When I say this everyone in the comment section might agree with me on this. This is what everyone wants. instead of spending 700 crores, they should have spent at least 1% of that money and bought the theatrical rights and re-released the 4k version of "Ramayan : The legend of prince rama" movie in theatres. Everyone in our country would have enjoyed and appreciated them if they did that. Last but not least that movie made by both Japanese and Indian filmmakers. That is the Ramayan we want.

@girishmahtle8673

Жыл бұрын

Thanks for mentioning TUMMBAD

@Azx12345

Жыл бұрын

They actually shot at live locations and how beautiful those shots are can't even compare them to this thing adipurush

@samikshasuvarna1174

Жыл бұрын

Oh yes this is such a right point to make!!! The concept art of this film only seems to be never made!! Tumbaad moments have a strong conception which is heavy enough even after bad cgi of Hastar!!

@akshanshbadole6730

Жыл бұрын

Tumbbad makers and actors had a passion to make a masterpiece movie. While making adipurush makers and actors didn't show any passion to make movie. They just want to earn money and mislead the audience.

"Ramayan- The epic' (2010) also deserves the hype. I used to watched it on CD when I was younger and it was one of my favourites. The BG score is so powerful and nostalgic. It is a 3d animated movie and worth a watch. Available on KZread. My cue to binge watch it rn 🏃‍♀️ Edit- I just got to know that the voices of Ram and Sita are given by Manoj bajpayee and Juhi Chawala 🤯 and Ravana's by Ashutosh Rana!

I was a kid when I watched Ramanand Sagar's Ramayan on Doordarshan, but when I watched it again on 2020 lockdown I just loved it, and my favorite character was Kumbhakarna, I don't know who performed the character but the way he presented on screen, the dialogues with Ravan and as the character he was I just loved it. I, as a new age person still loved it, and I think everyone surely will.

What Gambhir said about Indian cricket audience also applies to movie audience... We are always being influenced by actors aka individuals and not the team.... I hope people start taking directors as important as we look at stars... It is directors who is responsible for final vision... Adipurush is disgraceful...

@jaiminsharma

Жыл бұрын

@kochikame363 exactly

@dontmesswithme2120

Жыл бұрын

Waste prabhas...his time in the industry is over...its better he retires instead of making these kindof trash films🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

@agasthya9128

Жыл бұрын

Yet Prabhas fans will defend this movie with their life. Met one yesterday and his justification why he found the movie good was just hilariously shocking. They are just blind by Prabhas. They don’t care about the movie quality at all.

@RealShaktimaan

Жыл бұрын

In South, movie never opens dud like they do in Bollywood. Telugu states had great box office bc of their god and Tamil didn't because movie didn't have their god in the movie.

@Tunascoop

Жыл бұрын

Prabhas is average at best

The Legend of Prince Rama by the Japanese animator Yugo Sako was played first time on Sunday on Cartoon Network in India. I still remember it was advertised heavily.

@santanusk2853

Жыл бұрын

Oh I watched it several times as a kid & wondered why it was far more charming than other cartoons. My excitement was no less than DBZ

@poojasarkar7552

Жыл бұрын

It was the first movie I watched when my family got our first colour tv................

@venkatramannayak6062

Жыл бұрын

Frankly tats how I was introduced to ramayan....

@the_alley_cat_

Жыл бұрын

Aahh... Those were the best days.

@subhajitbasu4187

Жыл бұрын

I remember it aired for the first time on Doordarshan. Later the rights were bought by Cartoon Network.

Why the sequence of Vali and Sugreev were so beautiful is that they're very similar in their claims and it's hard to see who deserved the throne. Vali was the first king, the stronger one, who trusted his brother, and felt so betrayed when he thought that his brother abandoned him to die to have the throne and his wife. However, Ram decided to kill him, against his own rules of not killing from behind, for the sake of what (he believes) is right. It shows how thin is the line between what is good and what is bad, and also shows how wise ram was. What was pictured on screen in adipurush, a small child can understand why Sugreev was better than Vali, making Ram's judgement not grand enough to paint his character.

@krishnanunnimadathil8142

Жыл бұрын

Bali and Sugreev is their own movie.

Remember how Prabhas fans were trolling every single thing about Brahmastra and saying "wait for Adipurush. You'll see how south promotes Hinduism" and all? LOL 😂

@kaustubh6113

Жыл бұрын

Now they are telling its bollywood movie ..

@RahulSoni-om3yl

Жыл бұрын

@@kaustubh6113 sab aise he hain

After watching Adipurush , Now i really think that Shakuntala did a really great job with it's budget. Atleast it looks like a TV serial project and not a disasterous cartoon

I watched Adipurush yesterday evening... and my respect for Mani Ratnam increased. Mani Ratnam's adaptation Raavan ( his worst ) though flawed was still way better in terms of visuals, storytelling, music & treatment compared to Adipurush🙏🏻 If the makers wanted a spin on Ramayana.. they could've made a movie on Chadrabati Ramayana.

@lifegamerpro4033

Жыл бұрын

One hate love no matters only money 🤑🤑🤑🤑 🤑 Matters EOD

@kashutosh9132

Жыл бұрын

Where ravaan was shown good and ram in bad light? Thats kind of ramayan you like?

@Sam-Ang023

Жыл бұрын

@@kashutosh9132 I think you didn't read my comment properly.

@daphne3631

Жыл бұрын

I liked Raavan a lot. Watched it in theatre. I think Mani Ratnam did a good job. Loved Abhishek as Beera in it. I am glad someone else mentioned it.

One thing noticed in Adipurush is that in the original version Sita was in Ashok Vatika in Lanka and the Ashok tree still symbolizes grief and longing in hindu culture. But in the film instead of Ashok vatika it is full of cherry blossoms 🌸 with baby pink flowers all around as if Sita is in Japan. How come these makers are so dump about the facts

These filmmakers think that they can befool us by portraying anything regarding Hindu scriptures as they believe this new generation anyway won't be knowing the real one.. this has become their overconfidence and their audacity to make a film like this and argue on television.. Until unless we know our roots and history.. we can prevent these moves from being carried forwards to our next generation.. It solely depends on our reaction to these kind of attempts..😐

The sad part is that Indian people know how to stage the Ramayana, they’ve been doing it for centuries. We have entire texts like the Natya Shastra and the Abhinaya Darpana that teach how to stage these things. There are four types of Abhinaya ( this is what leads the audience to the experience or the Rasa). If you have presented the Ramayan and the audience is upset at the end, you completely botched the Rasa. Angika Abhinaya - use of body, facial expressions. Rama has to appear composed. Ravana should not appear like some cartoonish villain. Every character in the story has a particular type of physical embodiment Vachika Abhinaya - this is dialogues in music. again dialogues were a mess in this film. Aharya Abhinaya - this is costuming and state setting. This is actually the most important thing in presenting a story from the itihasa. The audience has to be very easily able to tell the character from their costuming. they cannot be wondering why Ravan has some sort of teenage boy haircut. Satvika Abhinaya. Very difficult to explain but the subtle elements of expression. Watch Maduri Dikshit dance she uses them. Probably any dance teacher or even some fifth standard teacher or even a bunch of random aunties could’ve done a better job putting together a Ramayana.

@daphne3631

Жыл бұрын

Very well written

@limelight2228

Жыл бұрын

Thank you for this information 🙏

The difference between a director like Ayan Mukherjee and an Om Raut is clearly evident. While one had total conviction on his story that he worked hard to make sure it looked good on the big screen and spent years getting the perfect Visual Effects possible. He even took the public's criticism about the dialogues and atleast made some efforts to do some editing changes in the OTT version so that the scenes feel less cringy. While that may or may not have been totally successful it tells you a lot about a person who really had made a story with a vision, sincerity and conviction and really wanted the people to be invested in it. While the total opposite can be said of Om Raut and his team as there seems to ne no sincerity in the efforts to make this movie and it is clearly evident that they wanted to just ride on the Epic's popularity and people's emotions towards the text to just mint money. The way they have been giving interviews and press conferences and performing idiotic marketing gimmick are testament to the level of arrogance these people have. Shame of T-series and the entire team for making this such a disaster from the get go with zero effort. Adipurush is indeed the biggest scam of 2023

@Sun.Shine-

Жыл бұрын

Oh, was the dialogues revised in OTT version?

@ashwinikumar261

Жыл бұрын

@@Sun.Shine- yes

@dontmesswithme2120

Жыл бұрын

Prabhas career drowning lol🤣🤣🤣His time in the industry is over...its better he retires instead of making these kindof trash films🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

@Akash-cg3iy

Жыл бұрын

You can't compare one tatti with another much. Both are 💩

@barsha362

Жыл бұрын

It is criminal to play with sentiments of people in the name of God

Always love the reviews and deep discussions. Just one suggestion please work on the pronouncing names please. For eg- It's taa-dah-ka

The only reviewer who is not saying taunting other religions saying - if something similar was done in other religions they would have bombed you, beheaded you etc. Thanks for being true to your job❤

I am so surprised that it's now that people are realizing Prabhas was a wrong casting for Ram ji. I hated him from the very first time i saw him in the role. I was even surprised that people weren't trolling or protesting against it. Instead, everyone was Preaching Prabhas, that wow, India's biggest star, he is looking amazing, he will get the movie the success it deserves. Literally log chaat rahe the. I consider him the most selfish actor. He 100% knew he was looking terrible in the role. Infact, he was more suited fir the role of Ravan than Saif. But still he took the role because he was hungry for the praise and credit. To be called the actor who does the biggest indian movies. He was also greedy like Om the director. Their only aim was to take advantage of people's emotions and make the biggest ever profit over it. They were overly confident that they can easily fool the audience and make money. Ramayan aisi movie hai jo main apna ghar bechkar bhi sahi banau lekin itni gandi banakar world level pr na release karu puri countryaur heritage ko embarrass karne ke liye. Director ko to itni gaaliya sunane ka mann kr raha hai ki hadd nahi. Abhi bhi pakka vo galti nahi manega bas defend karega khudku creative liberty ka excuse dekar.

@dhyeypandya581

Жыл бұрын

Exactly, Prabhas mujhe bhi shuru se bakwas lag raha tha Shree Ram ke liye, aur uss bande ne ek baar bhi apni body pe bhi kaam nahi kiya, acting to jaane hi do...pataa nahi kyon logo ne usse sar chadaa rakhaa hai, mujhe to baahubali ke baad ek bhi movie me Prabhas ka kaam achha nahi lagaa

@kavya26s

Жыл бұрын

Hey 😅 I don't know if you have been following any video regarding adhipurush or not but from the start itself prabhas was heavily criticized and everyone including his die hard fans have accepted that prabhas is a wrong choice to play as Lord Ram. I don't know which universe you were living in😂😂

@dhyeypandya581

Жыл бұрын

@@kavya26s before the release of posters and teaser, i rarely saw someone who was worried with Prabhas playing as Shree Ram. Otherwise everyone was rejoicing about the casting of Prabhas.

@kavya26s

Жыл бұрын

@@dhyeypandya581 well that's not true. See the comments posted under teaser reviews of this very channel. I m sure u would find many comments against casting prabhas. I like prabhas and I myself agree he was a bad choice for adipurush.

@brucewayne6590

Жыл бұрын

Prabhas post bahubali is the worst actor out there 🤣🤣

Screw this. Now, the only thing we need to do is somehow get the new remastered version of the 1992 Ramayana released worldwide.

@bhavapritaapara9274

Жыл бұрын

Yes

@deepalimahajan6313

Жыл бұрын

Absolutely!!!!

@ashwinidesai4051

Жыл бұрын

Rightly said.

I think we deserve Adipurush because we Banned a masterpiece like Legend of Prince Rama at indian theatres.

Yugo Sako one's make me cry its that good, emotions are on point with cute animation

While Brahmastra too had poor dialogues, I feel that at least there was a vision, but execution failed. With Adipurush instead, there was no vision at all.

@AtulKumar-le3mu

Жыл бұрын

Look no body had any expectations from Brahmastra but with Adipurush it's basically one of the most epic stories in the world stillOm raut failed miserably

@Sun.Shine-

Жыл бұрын

Brahmastra had good intentions are a story vision for it. And it is a director's film not an adaptation.

Bobby Deol cameo in the start was such a sweet surprise. Following Jammy for 5 years now and can't believe he has grown so much that celebrities just appear randomly from their bedroom in his videos🤌🔥

@TriedRefusedProductions

Жыл бұрын

Hahahahahah 😂

@mr.hiccup

Жыл бұрын

😂😂😂😂

@sanchitkumar5784

Жыл бұрын

😂😂

@anishkhadgi6822

Жыл бұрын

@@TriedRefusedProductions next time Naiyo Naiyo

@ayushchoubey7319

Жыл бұрын

Lmfao

What an amazing review! This is the 1st video of yours that I'm watching and I'm greatly impressed. Most sensible review, holistic, great choice of words, crisp yet informative, effortlessly weaved in sarcasm without diluting the essence! Was planning to watch in the theatre; you helped save my money! Subscribed now!

Had no idea on the backstory and story on this. I enjoyed the film alot and can't speak to the language spoken but saw great heroes and villains. A little long and weak FX, but I still had fun. Thanks for this!

Just imagine a foreigner who is not aware about Ramayana get introduced to it by watching Adipurush😑... What will they think of our Epic😢

@RR_theproahole

Жыл бұрын

They won't be going to theatres after seeing the reviews and I am happy about that

@daphne3631

Жыл бұрын

The thought is apalling. It makes me want to stop its international screening

One of the major setbacks I felt with the film was how emotionally empty each character was portrayed to be. Given that it's an epic that is so close to our hearts, there was no sense of connection with any character. Lord Ram is the embodiment of all things good, sincere devotion, a calm demeanor and a sense of peace that comes with him, and starting the introduction of Lord Ram with an illogical fight sequence just took away what Lord Ram stands for.

@user-rm5rz2zh8k

Жыл бұрын

So fcking true There's no emotional connection

@dontmesswithme2120

Жыл бұрын

Waste prabhas...his time in the industry is over...its better he retires instead of making these kindof trash films🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

@joydipbera8665

Жыл бұрын

Prabhas just had only one fkin facial expression in the entire movie

I see what you did there in the introduction of Indrajeet, played a clip from MCOC game with the Night Crawler SP3 against Joe Fixit.

Small correction - In Ramayan (atleast some equally prominent versions), Lord Ram pray to sea god, but when he didn't respond he threaten him. So that is the whole part, but it's true even there Ram was trying to solve things in peaceful manner, and teached us that violence should be our last resolve.

If I may say so, I believe the actors too are to be blamed for this disaster. I understand the fact that an actor is mostly dependent on the director's vision for the movie, but come on someone in the cast should have questioned the sanity of the makers halfway across the shooting process. The story of Shree Ram teaches us that even in the most direst of circumstances human beings can make the choice to be compassionate, calm and courageous. Adipurush just destroyed the essence of the epic.

@amandadarkwood535

Жыл бұрын

I mean didn’t they read the script before signing the movie??

@seemonjena659

Жыл бұрын

@@amandadarkwood535 Yeah that too! Maybe they were hopeful that the direction would be better than the script considering the fact that Omm Raut was considered to be the real director of Tanhaji which after the release of Adipurush is in question big time! Or it can be said that even the actors are highly materialistic like the makers and wanted nothing but to mint money by riding on the currently prevalent Hindutva climate!

@amandadarkwood535

Жыл бұрын

@@seemonjena659 don’t know about the others but Kriti Sanon is definitely materialistic which is quite clear from her film choices despite her success with Mimi. She doesn’t seem to be passionate about acting itself but rather everything else that comes with being a Bollywood star. She seems like the kind of person who just wants to make as much money as possible without any real love for cinema.

@dontmesswithme2120

Жыл бұрын

Waste prabhas...his time in the industry is over...its better he retires instead of making these kindof trash films🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

@Finnola

Жыл бұрын

That's the joke of the century. Actors come into this project just to collect big pay checks. "Pan India" collaborations has become a joke with these spectacle based movies. It only works few times and the majority of time movies are not focused on stories and getting something new out of the actors. In prabhas case there's no story just try to replicate what he did years ago and attract other actors with promises of big pay day.

The animated Ramayana showed more of Ramayana in 2.5 hours than what Adipurush did in 3… Just goes to show how a well researched project turns out as an end product.

@venkatramannayak6062

Жыл бұрын

There are different versions of ramayan in each region... with some extra details nd some additional stories tat gives good morales only... nd m pretty sure the director and writer have not even read one of them.. just heard ramayan in brief nd then made movie out if it so tat today's ppl can relate to it

Very well put brother. Hope they had you in the team .. I dont know how those experienced directeros can be so careless.

Bro! Love your content! The less I say something about this movie, the better. Though just a heads up, it's 'Tadaka' as in ताड़का , not really TadAka. Big fan!

The problem with the movie is lack of research. The makers failed to understand the nature of characters. To oversimplify the dialogues you can't just change the powerful but calm nature of characters like Hanuman or Shri Ram. Ravan ki niyat kharab thi par wo bhi maha pandit tha.

@DarkMasterEdits-Mashups

Жыл бұрын

Now dialouge writter of aadipurush manoj mushthashir publish video on difference between valmiki and tulshi das ramayan

@prathapcharan

Жыл бұрын

Ramayana kaa kya research kare . It's an epic known by almost all the Indians one way or another. It's just pure laziness and felt like money laundering to me.

@lifegamerpro4033

Жыл бұрын

Simply they want to connect with chapri hindus ...Manoj said chapri hindus dont understand bhata shree typo of launguage

@elle12390

Жыл бұрын

And its surprising that they didn’t do proper research despite such easy access to resources. Also most of us know the story and nuances of the characters. How can you mess it up!

@elle12390

Жыл бұрын

@@prathapcharan Money laundering seems like only reasonable explanation otherwise botching it this bad makes no sense

The sad thing is that in yesterday's republic tv interview (probably) both the writer and director said "we have not created ramayan but a story heavily inspired by it" which was expected and predicted already when they knew thry will be questioned. This clearly shows the intentions of the makers. This event adds another excuse to the "boycott bollywood" narrative and also a reference to mock our ancient scriptures unnecessarily.

@a-fact-ed

Жыл бұрын

Then why add the song "Jai Shri Ram" and a seat vacant for Hanumanji

@ranbirraj4385

Жыл бұрын

Bro Bollywood has nothing to do with this. No johar,No big khan, No Kapoor, No Bhatt. Writer and Director of this movie already said that few years ago they don't belong to Bollywood . Except Tseries who is co producer with Prabhas.

@PrabhanjanMangalgi

Жыл бұрын

@@a-fact-ed they want to play it all the way. Agar hit hota to ramayan keh dete, abhi joote pad rahe hai toh bolte Hain ki inspired hai. Shamelessness has a face and it's the makers of this movie.

@PrabhanjanMangalgi

Жыл бұрын

@@ranbirraj4385 this is what I wrote exactly in the main message bro,

@a-fact-ed

Жыл бұрын

@@PrabhanjanMangalgi the duality of the Adipurush team

As a Telugu person, Saaho was a mistake on tollywood. It was under the direction of a Telugu director. Adipurush despite starting Prabhas, is a mistake on Bollywood because it was predominantly under the direction of a Hindi director and a Hindi production. Don’t hate please

@visordownn

Жыл бұрын

The lead actor also has creative control over the project, he knew a sh!show is being made, still he complied.

@prathikdevaruppala

Жыл бұрын

@@visordownn for Adipurush, he probably thought that it could be good, but didn’t know since he was probably in front of a green screen the entire time

@snak3eye547

Жыл бұрын

The uneducated Telugu and Prabhas fans as usual will make this a hit movie and it allready crossed 340 cr. And seeing how this is becoming a box office hit more hack directors like Om Raut Will butcher more historical movies in the future like Mahabharata..

@anvishrivastava9766

Жыл бұрын

Totally…

@AnotherNPC1234

Жыл бұрын

who cares? North Indians don't associate their identity with bollywood anyway. They watch whatever they like he irrespective of industry.

Very good review and appreciate the genuine efforts to put across your points,to call out the disaster this venture has finally turned out.

So we are just going to ignore the fact that the makers of Adipurush completely skipped the character of Akshaykumar (Ravan's Son) who in brawl was killed by Hanuman ji. Cool!!

This movie showcase the current mindset of Nations HinduSs who just shout the slogan of jai shree ram without understanding the teaching of lord Rama and Ramayan.

@krishshautriya5170

Жыл бұрын

Well said.

@AcidifiedMammoth

Жыл бұрын

To a certain extent yes.

One of the popular book by Ankur Warikoo, "Do Epic Shit," seems to have inspired Om Raut to make epic level Adipurush.

Ok, this is quite crazy, the nightcrawler vs Joe fixit fight at 1:21 is from a mobile game called "Marvel contest of champions" which I've been playing for the past 4 years. The fact that jammy placed this game scene in one of his videos is like the unexpected crossover I've never experienced in my life. Thanks jammy for bringing together this moment for me.

Saw a beautiful comment here explaining how we could do Ramayan 7 part movie ... But hear me out, why don't we do a three-part movie (which is more practical) and between each movie we do an OTT series the covers the subplots. (similar to what Marvel is doing to build the universe) The three movies would be covering the main plots of the Ramayana story and an anthology styled series could be covering the important subplots within Ramayana that fleshes of the whole story. (3 parts and two series in between).

@AcidifiedMammoth

Жыл бұрын

Yes! That is typically how I like large scale mythology/fantasy done. Just as how I wish LOTR was done and Rings of Powers should've been that anthology series instead of the shitshow that Amazon churned out.

To be honest they could've just made a remastered animated version of the movie with voices by Bollywood actors and that would've have been appreciated much and loved even more by gen'z'

@youdontknowme2913

Жыл бұрын

The animation of the ramayan movie 1992 is already remastered, it only needs a remastered voice acting

@paxonite-7bd5

Жыл бұрын

​@@youdontknowme2913nobody can replace amrish puri's voice for ravaan

@dontmesswithme2120

Жыл бұрын

Waste prabhas...his time in the industry is over...its better he retires instead of making these kindof trash films🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

@daphne3631

Жыл бұрын

Good idea. I would pay to watch that

@youdontknowme2913

Жыл бұрын

@@paxonite-7bd5 that's a gospel truth tho

greatest achievement of Adi Purush - got everyone talking about The Legend of Prince Ram

At 11:05 in Ramayan, Ram prays to Sea god for path continuously for 3 days. When when he doesn't answer, he threatens to destroy the sea. After which a fearful Sea God appears and asks for forgiveness. For which Ram forgave him, but he said I have already put my arrow in my bow and it cannot be put back, so tell me where should I use this arrow. He directs him to an alternative mountain where demons are running havoc to which Ram complies. It was changed in animated Ramayan, doesn't mean it never happened. You also need to read the texts or watch the Ramayan by Ramanand Sagar. It seems your point of reference to Ramayan is only the Animated film.

I am baffled that no one is bashing prabhas for his body language and the way he carried himself He was just sleep walking through his role just like Akshay Kumar did for samraat Everyone blamed Akshay for the failure but no one is talking about prabhas lame portrayal of Shri Ram The best I have heard is that prabhas is suitable for Anil kumble's biopic😂

@prathapcharan

Жыл бұрын

You haven't been following social media then. People are trolling prabhas like anything and telling him to get his act together and concentrate on his physique

@kavya26s

Жыл бұрын

Oh here I am thinking prabhas is blamed more than the director and people are trolling him like anything !!

@snak3eye547

Жыл бұрын

The uneducated Telugu and Prabhas fans as usual will make this a hit movie and it allready crossed 340 cr. And seeing how this is becoming a box office hit more hack directors like Om Raut Will butcher more historical movies in the future like Mahabharata..

@daphne3631

Жыл бұрын

True. They think that making the actors work put like Arnold Schwarzenegger would be enough

@thehawkseye3412

Жыл бұрын

That's because Majoj Muntashir became brand ambassador for this movie. Since he was the one promoting and defending he is the one getting most heat. Secondly there are so many problems with the movie that reviewers comment on acting as a foot note only. Prabhas seems to be director's actor. If the movie was otherwise good, people might have said more on his acting.

Besides the creative choices, I think the biggest mistake that was made by the makers was to tell a story like Ramayan within a single film. No matter how long it might be, there are so many components that just cannot be fit into a single film. 2 or 3 films should've done the job.

@atharvadeshpande3090

Жыл бұрын

Duology or Trilogy would have been better. . . Like first part setting up every backstory and ending with Sita Abduction. Second Part is the assembly of VanarSena and ends with Building of Ram Setu And the Third Part, the epic finale Would have just been awesome. Shit, I want to see that now!

@Nishanth_mementomori

Жыл бұрын

They can make Ramayana in one movie... Fr example the anime movie frm the 90s.. these fools who made this movie are incompetent that's it

@youdontknowme2913

Жыл бұрын

The personality of the characters also don't match with the characters either from tulsi das nor valmiki's work.

@AHMEDKHAN-ep2uh

Жыл бұрын

I think SS Rajamouli is planning for Mahabharata but as a series

@debasheesh

Жыл бұрын

​@@atharvadeshpande3090it's a good thing this particular venture was not dragged out But yes other people who actually give the source material the respect it deserves can do justice to it with a trilogy

I can't believe that 05:45 is a still from the movie. Neither have I watched the old Ramayana nor the animated one. I remember watching Ramayana every weekend where Gurmeet and Debina played Ram and Sita. I am glad that I learnt whatever I learnt about Ramayana from that as a child and not this, whatever this is. 😒 Imagine a child watching this joke for the first time and thinking that this _is_ Ramayana. 🤦‍♀️ But from whatever reviews I've watched so far, I feel like I should watch both the Ramayanas. Especially the animated one. It looks so beautiful honestly. I could see so much love and emotions in that Ram, the dedication of a Japanese is so visible in the divinity of the Indian Epic.♥️🌻

Can a petition be made to release Ramayana: The Legend of Prince Rama on big screen?

Bapu Directed Telugu 1972😊 in Sampoorna Ramyanam they showed everything in 3 hours 10 min So no need of two part movie They showed starring from Janak story to Ravan death And that movie is an epic

@rkiran3675

Жыл бұрын

Yes it is an epic Wonderful movie

@GamerOnes

Жыл бұрын

​​​@slayerave you seen the film Only You North people thinks that 😂

@GamerOne_me

Жыл бұрын

@slayer no first watch Sampoorna Ramayana 1971 starring shoban babu There is a devotion Uss mein janak ka cruse, Ram birth, Ram getting his celestial weapons Sabh kuch dhikaya O bhi uss samay with that time effects Director is Bapu so bina dheke kuch bhi mat bolo

@GamerOnes

Жыл бұрын

​@slayerMC sahi se baat karna nahi aata Tumhara northwale ko kaha se ayega Tum log Maa behen ki ijjat hi nahi karte Tu tho teri Maa ko bechega

@rkiran3675

Жыл бұрын

@slayer is this what you mum taught May be in your house you do this with your sis 😂 You should have done with your mum tooo🤣🤣

Prabhas is still in Bahubali's role and Saif is in Udaybhan's role which he played in Tanhaji

your explanation created curiousness in me to know the original ramayan and it's core emotions

You did justice with the review, while other are roasting, you carefully elaborated the flaws 👏

I actually came to know about Ramayana through the serial " JAI HANUMAN " .It used to air on DD 1 It was a great serial.

Ramayana can be made in two parts as part one can depict Ramayana until Sita is abducted and second part focuses on Lord Rama journey to save Sita from Lanka. As it would have made justice to the text.

It has been proven time and time again that when makers don’t connect with the source material deeply the product always falls short…. This is just an extreme case of that. Ramayana is an emotion to most Indians, something woven into our psyche, turning it into a cash grab is shameful. Expected more from Prabhas.

Chalo finally aap ne jara honest review de diya warna bohot hi napa-tula review dete ho taaki safe raho...all the best and more courage for future reviews

It is very sad even Japanese person who created anime Ramayana was understand very well and as Indian they failed to understand. 😢😢😢

This could've been easily a trilogy but they had to make only one. My only hopes lies on SS Rajamouli making a multi part Mahabharata like basing a movie on 1 or 2 chapters from the epic. it will be a dream come true to if we get a Mahabharata Pentalogy or more than 5 movies diving deep into mythos and characters

There was such a strong emotional disconnect between the audience and the actors. At no point in the movie did I feel like rooting for Prabhas, not like I rooted for Saif but still. The only time I felt tense was during the Jataiu scene. We all know that Jataiu dies, but I was rooting for him. When I was watching Brahmastra I was rooting for Ranbir and Alia regardless of how annoying they were. This was missing in Adipurush. AND THE ENDLESS SLOW MOTION SHOTS OF PRABHAS! The first scene with the saste dementors had no reason. Why were they there? Anyway, treated the movie like a comedy and had fun.

The worst part of the movie was, I didnt feel anything. There was no pont where i felt happy, sad, excited or angry. I just sat there, for 3 hours, waiting to feel something.