Lily Gladstone’s win AND her acceptance speech were the highlights of the entire evening. I also loved Da’vine’s acceptance speech.

@AnnieZehra

5 ай бұрын

Even though carey and emma had better performances.!

@AnnieZehra

5 ай бұрын

her acceptance speech was barely a speech! she just came accepted this award, said some lame words n left.!

Lily’s performance reminded me of Luise Rainer in “The Good Earth”. All in the eyes, and beautiful facial expressions, conveying the deepest of emotions.

@AnnieZehra

5 ай бұрын

ugh, it was makeup that made her look sad n all, she could hardly emote through facial expressions and voice. it was just makeup that made those shots possible!

@skyavalanche

5 ай бұрын

@@AnnieZehra Thank you for your shallow and comical response.

@AnnieZehra

5 ай бұрын

@@skyavalanchelol i just refused to be kind and preferred being honest! The role was written like that, she was required to look depressed and dejected in certain scenes but did she pull it off? Hard to say!

@skyavalanche

5 ай бұрын

@@AnnieZehra Track her awards, and an Oscar yet to come, with critical acclaim from prestigious critics. Then have the absurd audacity to pin it on the altered foundation and rouge. Ridiculous!

@AnnieZehra

5 ай бұрын

@@skyavalancheYou're ridiculous! And, you have no sense of acting! Your taste is so bad, you are one of those fewest people who like this piece of plump!

There is absolutely nothing shocking about Lily winning SAG, and she should be favored on Oscar Sunday. I'm genuinely confused how anyone can describe her win as shocking.

@fong03

5 ай бұрын

I'm with you. Yes, Stone had a real chance of winning, but it's not like Gladstone was out of left field. She has the narrative this year and her win might be the only win her film gets. Stone already has an Oscar, which might work against her. Poor Things did perform well with nominations, but it's Oppenheimer that is this year's EEAAO, so she won't be riding the wave the same way Yeoh and JLC did last year. I'm leaning Gladstone. The lack of a BAFTA nomination does raise an eyebrow, but two years ago neither Close (the slight front runner,) nor Coleman (the eventual winner ) were nominated. It's definitely the closest of the acting races. I hope Gladstone wins though.

Thanks Brian from The Awards Contender for sending me here. You're so good looking.

Hi Ryan, happy February to you. I got 4/5 categories correct. I went with Murphy because of the Oppenheimer express. The love for Oppenheimer is one of the strongest we have seen this century. It only really rivals EEAAO, Chicago, ROTK and Slumdog. It's the type of film, where people just check all the boxes. The only one I got wrong was Gladstone over Stone. I know you love your stats, and I got a good one for you. Since 2000, we have only seen three actresses win Best Actress without the most or tied for the most televised wins. They were Halle Berry, Olivia Colman, and Michelle Yeoh. Berry and Yeoh were both SAG winners and were seen as a milestone in color representation. Berry = first lead black woman. Yeoh = first Asian woman. Colman did not win the SAG, but she won BAFTA and most of the high end critics circle awards. Close was in a single nominee and didn't win many critics circle awards. When we look at Gladstone vs. Stone, we see that Gladstone has won about 24 awards to Stone's 18. To me, it feels like Gladstone is heading down the same trajectory as Berry and Yeoh. The only real difference is that BAFTA omission (I don't use the word snub). Yeoh and Berry were both up for the BAFTA. Only Berry was up for the BAFTA in the next calendar year. Are you leading toward Emma or Lily? Either way, the letters Stone will appear on the Oscar envelope.

@tonyg76

5 ай бұрын

Berry should not have won, seemed like purely a diversity win. I did not like Yeoh either, but some did.

It's so cool you were actually there, lucky!

All 4 acting wins have been my favourite performances of the year & my picks in their categories from the beginning. Words can’t express how much I want Cillian Murphy to be an Oscar winner. His performance in Oppenheimer was extraordinary to me. I haven’t been that astonished by a performance in a long time. I’m so glad this is his year. 👏 Lily Gladstone was just so powerful to me in Killers. To stand amongst & outshine two of the biggest actors in Hollywood was refreshing. I know there are arguments she’s not lead. She’s not in it enough. I don’t agree. Lily has every right to be in her category. There is precedent to past winners. She has every right to win. And I hope she does take the Oscar. These two roles from Cillian & Lily feel like wins not only for them but for reserved, subtle, nuanced, internalised type of acting. It’s rare these kind performances win over the bigger, showier ones.

@K.C-2049

5 ай бұрын

I just love Cillian because he seems like he really just whole heartedly loves acting. he's not here for the game or whatever, he just wants to act bless him. well deserved!

Emma Stone is my favorite actress and she gave my favorite performance of the year. To be fair she gives my favorite performance of the year almost every year. Hence her being my favorite actress. So it would have been fun to see her get the recognition she absolutely deserves and get another oscar. But at the end of the day the oscars don't matter and I'll look forward to her next project: Kinds of Kindness (also still waiting for that Cruella sequel)

@RyanCasselman

5 ай бұрын

This my friend is the right attitude. 👌

I’m glad Oppenheimer won big!!! It’s my favorite movie of 2023!!! I’m rooting for it at the Oscars!!!

@carlosatausupa8429

5 ай бұрын

OPPENHEIMER >> KILLER OF THE FLOWER MOON. MY FAVORITEN MOVIE BY CHRISTOPHER NOLAN. (together The Dark Knight 2008)

I loved Lily Gladstone performance, rooting for her in the Oscars to win. Or Sandra hula in anatomy of the fall which is underrated.

@AnnieZehra

5 ай бұрын

Ew, her inability to emote just doesnt make her a good fit for drama.!!!! Sandra huller was good though!

I predict these 4 will win the Oscars. And I do believe in one of your prediction criteria saying most recent wins before the Oscars will influence the voters.

If I may add, for the Oscars formula, you should look at the differences in when SAG/BAFTA happens vs when the voting period for the Oscars begin and ends.

thanks to Brian for the link that led me here :)*

Davine role in.the holdovers is so small. I wanted more of her

I think this award season is pretty much over now. I think Actress is the only major ambiguity, I think in same way as Bong Joon Ho winning over Tarrantino & Mendes for Director because of split votes Heuller could pull a Marisa Tomei style upset & win for Anatomy

I got ALL the predictions correct, and I was rooting for all of them! I wanted Oppenheimer to win big because it’s my favorite movie of the year, and I wanted Lily Gladstone to win because Emma Stone had already won for the amazing movie La La land. Also, Gladstone is the first Native American to win that award. *Keep in mind, I have not seen Poor Things or Killers of the Flower Moon yet…. They are on my watchlist.

@michelehamilton961

5 ай бұрын

I liked Oppenheimer as well. Until I saw Zone of Interest. ZOI will not win but it is on another level in terms of how film can discuss history.

The way barbie is a non.event at these awards shows. The hype around barbie has died

Lily Gladstone would win because the actors branch want some original work. Emma Stone's,s Poor Things mannerisms is somewhat similar to Olivia Coleman in The Favourite. And Emma Stone was in that show too. Plus she has won an Oscar before.

@tonyg76

5 ай бұрын

Who cares that she has won an oscar before. Did that stop Meryl Streep or Frances McDormand?

@khoohockleong7585

5 ай бұрын

@@tonyg76 Both Olivia and Emma are acting as sheltered inviduals so given to childish rancour. Frances and Meryl won for quite different roles. The Joker also was different if you look from the argument of similar roles. Both are first time winners and their roles were based on entirely different premises - one is a villain and thet a downtrodden individual who slowly became a psychopath.

Late to the party, but actor was not a close race at all, cca gave the illusion it was, but that is not an industry award. And following this year, the industry were fully behind Cillian and Oppenheimer. And with Universal and their behemoth marketing campaign, giving Paul Giamatti all this false hope was stupid.

An oscar, Sag and golden globe -- all came lily's way largely because they had to ensure someone from the native american community wins these accolades. Had this movie not been based on one of the native American tribes and she did not belong to the same tribe, she had no chance to win. And, as everyone's saying, this is probably her first and last time winning these big awards. Hard for her to win anything again! She cannot do some regular movie and win big! Her acting skills are not above par!

EEAAO was a stronger swipe last year, only by Brendan Fraser didn’t the big 5 and the bigger 8 hahahaha for calling it someway

@RyanCasselman

5 ай бұрын

Sweep as in taking ALL the major precursors. EEAAO didn't win BAFTA or Golden Globes.

Since 2002, every actor who had won BAFTA and SAG went on to win the Oscar BUT we still have the earlier cases. Russell Crowe won both and still lost the Oscar. Plus, Daniel Day-Lewis won both in 2003 and lost the Oscar. So there's still hope for Giamatti.

SAG and Oscar rarely go 4 for 4. One of the SAG winners will lose.

@MarshallFlores

5 ай бұрын

SAG and Oscar have matched 4/4 in 10 of the 29 years the SAG Awards have existed, and have matched 4/4 in six out of the last 10 years. It's far from "rare" and has been more common over time.

@josephdigristina2808

5 ай бұрын

@@MarshallFlores 33% accuracy is nothing to brag about.

@MarshallFlores

5 ай бұрын

@@josephdigristina280860% over the past decade. But you do you.

@MarshallFlores

5 ай бұрын

@@josephdigristina2808 1/3 is empirically not "rare" as you claim in your OP - if someone bats .333 in baseball they're usually an All-Star. And the average goes up to 60% in the past decade. But you do you.

@josephdigristina2808

5 ай бұрын

@@MarshallFlores Sucks big time with awards predictions. Who wants a 33% on Gold Derby when, like me, you're always in the top 25%. I'll forgoe the precursor , thank you.

Emma does nt need more awards...and other actors do

@tonyg76

5 ай бұрын

That is arguably a bad reason for Emma not to win. Plenty of people have multiple Oscars.

@ewabieda2920

5 ай бұрын

It's not what I meant. She does nt need more to be regarded as Great actress. Read with comprehention pls...

@tonyg76

5 ай бұрын

@@ewabieda2920 Comment with comprehension please. The end with other actors do indicates you are saying Emma should not win.

I am happy if Oppenheimer wins it all.

@tonyg76

5 ай бұрын

I am not. What an overrated movie similar to EEAAO and Nomadland.

I gotta say it again, and maybe this is just me thinking crazy, but I thought Emma’s reaction seemed, fake, over the top and cringy, I don buy it at all, again this is just me I could be wrong.

@AnnieZehra

5 ай бұрын

why are you so scared of saying it? lol. Youre right, it was exaggerated.

I almost vomited when I find out, that Emma lost. Unbelievable 😢 she nominated for all major award, but other two contenders not nominated for Bafta or not nominated for Sag. I think not having Sandra Huller affected race, she might splits some votes, and eventually Emma would’ve have been winner,but unfortunately, believe Emma was in fact close, but other 3 nominees not really strong enough for win. So it was Emma vs Lily I’m in depression whole day 😢

@dorino9057

5 ай бұрын

Emma has won plus Lily Gladstone gave heart to killers of the flower moon

@marikamarika7205

5 ай бұрын

@@dorino9057 and Emma didn’t? She was in since very first day, she’s also producer

@hopsfd

5 ай бұрын

I'm with you. Absolutely devestated. But at the end of the day the oscars don't matter. And she did win the BAFTA which I consider more prestigious from an artistic point anyway.

@tonyg76

5 ай бұрын

@@dorino9057 Who cares that Emma has won. That is not a great argument IMO.

@dorino9057

5 ай бұрын

@@tonyg76 it is an argument the Oscars like to give different people award, usually don’t award the Oscars twice unless it’s decades later.

PG won the CC because 90% of them loved PG and that’s a fact

Lily!

SAG award to Cillian is probably the end of great acting period

I'm sorry but after watching Emma Stone in Poor Things, Lily's performance feels so so inferior. And can we put an end to this 'she's too young to win 2 nd oscar' shit? When you give a performance like Bella Baxter, you are bound to win everything. That transformation and growth. I haven't seen in a while from an actress. Fuck Gladstone', give Emma the Oscar is my opinion. Lily is just very lucky. She has Scorsese and DiCaprio, 2 biggest names in the industry, behind her campaigning. That's how in the first place she got the lead actress thing. She's clearly supporting and no matter how good she is, people need to own up to it. But lately Oscar has been giving narratives win more than talent. So yeah, maybe they will award Gladstone but truly, if we are talking talented performances it's between 3 to me: Stone Huller and Lee( Lee's subtle performance was way more impactful and humane to me than Gladstone. Just because Song is new and upcoming, Lee didn't get much recognition this year. But in true sense, her performance in Past Lives was a tour de force. And also Sandra Huller, I'm so happy. She also gave a breathtaking performance. Unfortunately, talents have to see narratives win.)

@hopsfd

5 ай бұрын

I agree Emma Stone was simply next level. Not that anyone in the academy will care of course

@michelehamilton961

5 ай бұрын

@Flyover3215 so RDJ does not have a narrative and a crew backing him. Nolan does not have a narrative? You seem very selective with your “truth”. Either way there is no reason to trash Lily in order to support Emma. Lily and Sandra’s fans don’t seem to doing the same.

@slickwill9000

5 ай бұрын

Wow. That’s pretty disrespectful. What would Emma Stone, Greta Lee, and Sandra Huller think of your remarks towards their fellow artist?

@tonyg76

5 ай бұрын

@@michelehamilton961 Yes they are. Trashing Emma to say she should not win because she is white as some people have argued.

Emma is an actress, I do not give Emma credit for being a good sport. Lily should not win based solely on narrative, that is insulting. Neither should she win because Emma is too young or has won one before. Emma gave the best performance IMO and should win. Lily can win for a more deserving role where she actually leads the movie!

@dorino9057

5 ай бұрын

No, I really love Gladstone performance.

@CraigZadow-ct7re

5 ай бұрын

Assuming she won “solely” on narrative is insulting. Many people, including myself think Lily was the best of the year.

@michelehamilton961

5 ай бұрын

Emma is the best in your opinion. The fake takes that the performance you don’t prefer is not worthy is 😂. You think there is no narrative for RDJ? For Nolan?

@jonathanblaze1648

5 ай бұрын

Art is subjective. That's your opinion, it's not a fact that Emma was better, it's art. Actors always say it's harder to be understated and "do nothing". Versus a big showy performance where you have tons to do. And what do you know, actors voted for Lily.

@hopsfd

5 ай бұрын

As good as Lily is, it is super obvious that she is only winning because of her narrative and the fact that Emma has won before.

Emma stone is acting in losing