why all windows rolled down?

Rear seatbelt didn't appear to tension at all

Ouch

a ton of cars aren't doing well for rear passengers.

I'm assuming midsize cars will be next.

Looks like some fluid was left in before the test? Coolant? Interesting

@RockyFoxxowo

11 күн бұрын

The drain the fuel and replace it with stottard, the other fluids I wouldn't know if they leave or replace, because obviously it represents the weight of the vehicle in a sene

@christina2975

11 күн бұрын

@@RockyFoxxowo if it was fuel that spilled out in the crash, that would cause it to get a poor rating (edit: it did)

The hand…

You can have your giant luxury SUVs with 3 rows but it doesnt always mean you will be safe in a crash (well if you are a rear seat passenger)

Is this 2022-2023 models?

@OnyxHuber1187

Ай бұрын

I think it’s more 2020-2022 models

뒷좌석은 앞좌석보다 목에 오는 충격이 3.6배라네요.

im actually rather disappointed in hyundai. As far as i know, they have a decent rep for being pretty safe cars. Why slack off with one of the most expensive models?

@potatopotato8360

9 ай бұрын

It's an amazing and safe car. IIHS has just lost its marbles with mission creep (Increasingly high expectations every year)

How did this fail

@shawnsdiecast7852

11 ай бұрын

The seatbelt tightened up In the rear seats when the impact happened it untightened so the rear passengers could literally be ejected from the car. And those people would mostly consist of children. Seems like they wouldn’t slack off on that since they have a decent rep about being safe cars.

Damn, got a poor rating just because of the rear passenger safety was bad

@dfrom103yt4

Жыл бұрын

It's clearly a family SUV, of course rear passenger safety is a raised concern.

@shawnsdiecast7852

11 ай бұрын

And clearly when the seatbelt tightened up when the impact happened it untightened so the rear passengers could literally be ejected from the car. And those people would mostly consist of children. Seems like they wouldn’t slack off on that since they have a decent rep about being safe cars.

The dummy here showed LESS movement than in the "Good" Explorer, yet was more likely to be injured. I'm not convinced this is a valid test. Manufacturers will of course adjust seatbelt performance to match the height and weight of this dummy. But what happens when an adult or smaller child is sitting there?

@pronpalunpo1066

11 ай бұрын

It’s movement that are specifically on critical parts of the body, there was a lot of sideways which is very damaging. There’s also obviously a lot more paint on the airbags.

@cookiebaker6133

11 күн бұрын

I agree, without the data, just from visual measurement, some "poor" ratings are doing better than the "good" and "acceptable" ratings. Which I agree this test is not a valid test. Not to consider people can have different body sizes compare to the dummy used in this test. And also some details IMO is not considered in the rating as well, for example, rav4's back row dummy's head was stuck by the airbag which visually can cause a huge damage, also Nissan Frontier's back row dummy hits the back window which can also deal tons of damage. Instead of looking at how close the dummy's head is towards the front seat back, and the "kinetic" of the dummy, why ignoring the other details that cause huge damage to the dummy?

I thought the quilted seats would give more cushion in an accident!

@matthewmooney4301

11 ай бұрын

I highly doubt that quilted seats would have any impact on the vehicle’s rating

@garrettw99

11 ай бұрын

@@matthewmooney4301 it was a joke

I’ve been noticing that only gas cars have been getting a poor rating for sum odd reason every electric car is getting a A I’m not sure this is only a safety thing but also them pushing electric cars on us

@cookiebaker6133

11 күн бұрын

I think it is because of the weight of the EVs, the battery is so heavy that the jump up of the car tail was significant lower. This can cause the back row dummy gets less kinetic energy and therefore less tension from the seatbelt. In the end less damage from the seatbelt tension.

My dad currently owns this SUV, I'm really shocked how this got a poor rating.

@Windows_VistaSP2

11 ай бұрын

Same, but I'm glad to see my dad's car didn't get poor on other tests.

Kontainer Palisade Kecelakaan 💀💀💀

여기서는 외국아재들한테 까이고있네 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 불쌍한 휸다이쿤

Please do a 2023 model

@abcdefu721

Жыл бұрын

The model also same

@OnyxHuber1187

Ай бұрын

⁠@@abcdefu721doesn’t the 2023 change the front grill and some other things?

@RockyFoxxowo

11 күн бұрын

​@@OnyxHuber1187it's identical structurally

@OnyxHuber1187

11 күн бұрын

@@RockyFoxxowo yes, but I’m just saying it’s still a different model visually

This generation palisade isnt that old. Im surprised it did poor. Looks like Kia Hyundai group traded safety for cost cutting. Unfortunate.

@pepeshopping

Жыл бұрын

LOOK at the REST. Much harder impact in this NEW test. Give opinion in 2 years, once they all modify for this new test!

@theclueguy3388

Жыл бұрын

@@pepeshopping IIHS alerts automakers *two years* (might be wrong on that but that’s what i remember being told) before a new test comes out.

@Wasabi9111

Жыл бұрын

I think Hyundai group usually perform pretty well in crash test… But they’re the type of company that does the bare minimum in terms of safety to get the best grade, but not above and beyond that.

@nonconsensualopinion

9 ай бұрын

This is a new, updated test. Many SUVs did poorly. For this updated test they added a smaller dummy in the back seat. Previously only the results were measured for the front occupant. The cars have not become less safe. The tests have become more difficult to pass. All these manufacturers will have to improve.

Lmaoo it's a hyundai, what fo you expect?

They should have taken over the volvo……😂

Dummy waves hello nonchalantly.

역시 현대/기아는 새로운 테스트를 도입할 때마다 꼴찌...

Dear Hyundai, do better.

@toyotaguy_8722

Жыл бұрын

Lol yes I agree

@meffffy

Жыл бұрын

Most disposable cars on the market IMO

@DoSum4Me

Жыл бұрын

@@meffffy I’d say Subaru and Hyundai are neck and neck in the garbage they produce.

@user-ie3qv9sh5m

4 ай бұрын

Si igual como los toyota sino miremos el plastiquera de tacoma es horrible.

Volvo is Selena Gomez and Hyundai is Hailey Bieber.

@legioner9

Жыл бұрын

Volvo are crap cars. Average build quality at the best.

@busystudying6711

Жыл бұрын

@@legioner9 enlighten me on a good car brand then

@legioner9

Жыл бұрын

@@busystudying6711 Today? Almost none. Lexus is no. 1. Other than it, I don't know.

First time I've seen a new car do so poorly

@riggyh1058

Жыл бұрын

Have you seen the jeep

@scott5429

Жыл бұрын

Have you seen the subaru outback or crosstrek (I cant remember which one) in the side impact

@87redcoupe

Жыл бұрын

honda crv and many others did the same in this test. this test isn't structure. it's rear passenger data.

@akj2387

Жыл бұрын

Literally half of the cars did just as bad. Dk what you're talking about

@anyazeko4069

Жыл бұрын

Because it’s a new test. This happens every time there is a new test.

대실망 현대차ㅠㅠ

Time and again we see where Hyundai “value” comes from. Money invested in flashy screens with corners cut on safety and fuel economy.

@RaulCastroAtlanta

Жыл бұрын

BS..the Honda pilot didn’t do any better! 😅

@Ficon

Жыл бұрын

@@RaulCastroAtlanta Honda, like Toyota, is a terrible value proposition boosted by their reputation of being better than Chrysler in the 1980s. The Pilot they tested is inexplicably the outgoing model so perhaps the 2023 Outback-Explorer mishmash will do better.

@0w3nn

Жыл бұрын

Bro, like 10 other vehicles failed and you gotta criticize this one manufacturer?

@Ficon

Жыл бұрын

@@0w3nn It’s a Hyundai video so yes and they have a pattern of doing poorly. CX-9 is super old and Jeep products are Jeep products. Toyota and Honda are also terrible cost cutters.

@87redcoupe

Жыл бұрын

People have lost sight that this test is rear dummy data related to the seatbelt. Look at the actual reports for the data. The auto manufactures with marginal or acceptable have belt pretensioners that immediately retract and tighten during a collision in the back as they all do in the front. That's where anyone needs to start, regardless of manufacturer.

I don’t see what was bad. Rear passenger looked safe to me.

@christina2975

Жыл бұрын

lap belt slid from hip into torso allowing for serious injury to that region of the body. Lots of movement allowed. Looks like it lacked adequate pretensioners in the back.

@plmn93

Жыл бұрын

@@christina2975 Less movement than the Explorer, which was rated Good. Appears that too little movement may actually cause more neck injury.

@Normalmark1_

Жыл бұрын

According to the official ratings of this test, the rear passenger dummy's lap belt remained in the ideal position on the pelvis.(probably because of the anti-submarining seat) And it might gets worse than just lap belt sliding here. the main problem here was that “The chest forces and the likely risk of head, or neck injury”, Which was probably the result of the lack of the Seatbelt safety equipments. Like seatbelt pretensioners, which can make you move back to the desired position in collision, and from my perspective, it seems to be able to make seatbelt shock absorbing function act more effectively if equipped.(In this case, this one doesn’t seem to have both) To sum : it seems your lower half'gonna be fine, too bad your upper part ain’t gonna🫡

0:20 OMG SUNROOF BURST! What a bad structure quality!

@Stetson13SDG

Жыл бұрын

Wow

@legioner9

Жыл бұрын

The sunroof burst because it hit the metal suport welded on the roof, which is holding the camera that films the rear dummy.

@Trinny1751

Жыл бұрын

Sunroof wasn’t closed before crash. And idk why it needed that metal bar?

@ethanmckibbin

Жыл бұрын

The sunroof was wide open I'm not surprised it broke, they tested other models with the sunroof shut.

@legioner9

Жыл бұрын

@@Trinny1751 Nice troll, kid.

Wow iihs really doesn’t know how to rate car crashes at all

@michaelschneider-

8 ай бұрын

@CallMehTech .. How so? ... Wow the vehicle's glass sunroof shattered big time??

It's time for all automakers who failed this crash test to release their army of Washington lobbyists with briefcases full of legal documents and 💸 💰 lots of cash to convince lawmakers and politicians to soften the rear passenger crash test standards from the IIHS, by 20 mph less or so so that the test results look good for them to make the sale that their vehicles are safe! Just imagine if this scenario ever occurred, bribery from some unscrupulous manufacturers could possibly happen! I hope that never happens!!

@iihs-hldi

Жыл бұрын

IIHS is an independent non-profit, so lawmakers wouldn't have any influence on our testing standards.

@nwnwnwn

Жыл бұрын

@@iihs-hldiso..youre not in government?

@Seenoevilspeaknoevilhearnoevil

Жыл бұрын

@@iihs-hldi Thanks for keeping it real and honest!!

@wonwoodo6085

Жыл бұрын

@@nwnwnwn they are funded by the insurance companies to make the car safer so that the insurances can pay less

@nwnwnwn

Жыл бұрын

@@wonwoodo6085 black money omg

AMAZING 😍😍😍😍 IT DID AWESOME. SAFEST CAR.

@ureviews

Жыл бұрын

It did poor, did you see the kid in the back? Weird how there's a lot of positive comments here.... positive comments farm?

@40040

Жыл бұрын

Found the Hyundai shill

@Wongcerbon123

2 ай бұрын

Blind?

@Benjamin06267485

2 ай бұрын

@@ureviews did awesome. All systems worked: airbags, seatbelts, even the windshield didn’t cracked. Great absorption of the crash. Excellent car.

@Benjamin06267485

2 ай бұрын

@@40040 did awesome. All systems worked: airbags, seatbelts, even the windshield didn’t cracked. Great absorption of the crash. Excellent car.

ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 역시 흉기차 답다

@justinek6974

Жыл бұрын

@@user-xm4zd8wh8m 뭘 보라고? Poor 나온거 또 있는데?

@Modern_Flash

Жыл бұрын

​@@justinek6974 아직 2023년 모델은 테스트 안함

@justinek6974

Жыл бұрын

@@Modern_Flash 그렇네 페리전이네. 근데 결과는 똑같을거얌

@Modern_Flash

Жыл бұрын

@@justinek6974 패이스리프트 하면서 에어백 추가 돼서 다를걸요

@fl8092

8 ай бұрын

급식새끼ㅋㅋㅋ 나중에 울며겨자먹기로 중고로 아반떼 살거면서

Hyundai and Kia have always been shoddy cars. Thirsty, outdated and unreliable powertrains and cost-cutting engineering.

@Trinny1751

Жыл бұрын

so true.

@AyeeItsLaRock

Жыл бұрын

Tested poor due to rear passenger head/neck & chest injury. Same reason the Pilot, Highlander, CX-9 all tested bad. If you’re gonna hate on Hyundai/Kia- gotta hate on Honda, Toyota, & Mazda too 🤷🏻‍♂️

@TheGillederais

Жыл бұрын

​@@AyeeItsLaRockmazda cx9 n cx5 has bad result because theyre based on old platform, I believe if Im not mistaken since 2016. This Palisade however is more recent, thus makes it worse.

@ESTOQUE75

Жыл бұрын

@@TheGillederais These cars got poor ratings only because of no rear seat pre-tensioner. Not a structural problem.

@potatopotato8360

9 ай бұрын

Hyundai and Kia are awesome cars. Went to Hyundai and never going back to Toyohondas with weak powertrains and awd systems.

개흉기 썩차