Пікірлер

• 
  @lalalee826919 күн бұрын

  Amen Amen Amen ✝🙏

• 
  @thelawofworship2 күн бұрын

  Praise the Lord 🙏🏾

• 
  @stevestevesteve94624 күн бұрын

  Thanks for uploading, can you reference the sermon/provide a link in the comments please?

• 
  @KGB94TV2 ай бұрын

  “For he spake in a certain place of the seventh day on this wise, And God did rest the seventh day from all his works. And in this place again, If they shall enter into my rest.” (Hebrews 4:4-5, KJV)

• 
  @KGB94TV2 ай бұрын

  ““Remember the Sabbath day, to set it apart. “Six days you labour, and shall do all your work, but the seventh day is a Sabbath of יהוה your Elohim. You do not do any work - you, nor your son, nor your daughter, nor your male servant, nor your female servant, nor your cattle, nor your stranger who is within your gates. “For in six days יהוה made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them, and rested the seventh day. Therefore יהוה blessed the Sabbath day and set it apart.” (Exodus 20:8-11, TS2009)

• 
  @KGB94TV2 ай бұрын

  “And Elohim blessed the seventh day and set it apart, because on it He rested from all His work which Elohim in creating had made. ” (Genesis 2:3, TS2009)

• 
  @arlindodossantos23054 ай бұрын

  Can I please contact you privately?

• 
  @sulongenjop74364 ай бұрын

  Sabbath is actually refered to Jesus!!!

• 
  @thelawofworship3 ай бұрын

  What do you mean???

• 
  @roniguruleАй бұрын

  I listen to you and agree with you always, until now. GOD made the commandments. The fourth is remember the Sabbath, to keep it holy. Jesus was crucified on Friday, Jesus died on Friday. Witnessed, Yes! Mary went home to prepare for the Sabbath, Sunday Jesus was resurrected, witnessed, verified, yes. NO WHERE do I see where GOD OR Jesus to change that day from Saturday to Sunday. We are all human, therefore not perfect and fully capable of errors. I choose to follow the 7th day as the Sabbath, Sabbath, Latin for Saturday. I won’t go to hell now will I? I do respect you and listen to you daily, but I really think you may be wrong on this point

• 
  @kencharityboamponsah610210 күн бұрын

  This is not that he may be wrong. He is wrong per the Bible on the Sabbath. He is also like the false pastors who support lgbtq+ and other unbiblical teachings he criticizes in his preachings.

• 
  @sulongenjop74364 ай бұрын

  When one worship God, one is connecting and uniting oneself with God and heaven. Before one kneel, one must be repentant and forgiving. God won't accept a sinful soul who is not willing or yet to confess, repent and forgive.

• 
  @thelawofworship3 ай бұрын

  Indeed

• 
  @danielguedes72855 ай бұрын

  Pastor Voddie is such a great preacher. Praise the Lord for his life!!

• 
  @thelawofworship3 ай бұрын

  Amen

• 
  @eltonron15586 ай бұрын

  I'm completely confused. This is a minister of the legalism called, Sunday Christianity, yet he is admitting by scripture, he won't practice the Sabbath? He,and all of Sunday Christianity, are the subject of, 1John 2:3-4, bless your mortal hearts. I'm completely mystified. Why?

• 
  @thelawofworship6 ай бұрын

  And this is the thing, whenever the true 7th day Sabbath is replaced then confusion sets in. Pray for him and others like him.

• 
  @followingchristalone7 ай бұрын

  By keeping Sabbath on the first day, you are not keeping Sabbath. It would be the equivalent to your wife asking if you picked up the kids from school, and you said... I picked up "some" kids from school. Close enough.

• 
  @thelawofworship7 ай бұрын

  Exactly

• 
  @gregjones22177 ай бұрын

  And if you don't worship an imaginary being, what happens. Nothing.

• 
  @thelawofworship7 ай бұрын

  How do you measure that if He is imaginary?

• 
  @fivebooks84987 ай бұрын

  This is a great teaching. Unfortunately this preacher believes many of the commandments have been done away with.

• 
  @thelawofworship7 ай бұрын

  Thank you for that point. This preacher does believe that many commands that we should apply today have been done away with.

• 
  @gregjones22177 ай бұрын

  He's the one true god because he says so in the book written about him. Who would have guessed? There is no credible proof of any god anywhere at any time.

• 
  @thelawofworship7 ай бұрын

  Great point you make. Would you be able to prove that God does NOT exist please?

• 
  @gregjones22177 ай бұрын

  Why does the supposed creator of the universe need to be worshiped by a bunch of intelligent apes on an obscure planet in a common place galaxy in the vastness of infinity? Perhaps then, it's all made up by unscrupulous men trying to control the gullible and illiterate populous. Perhaps that unscrupulous behavior is being carried on by all manors of preachers today. Money talks.

• 
  @gregjones22177 ай бұрын

  Every religion claims the one true god or gods. The only thing that makes yours the one true god is because he says so in the book written about him. Why should I take the word of sheep herders over any one else?

• 
  @thelawofworship7 ай бұрын

  Firstly they were not sheep herders and secondly, you have to prove all things for yourself.

• 
  @gregjones22177 ай бұрын

  There is no law of worship. Only the pitiful pleadings of a book written milenea ago, trying to force the will of the few onto the many. Sadly some of that nonsense has carried forward to modern times.

• 
  @thelawofworship7 ай бұрын

  There is no law of worship to you because you refuse to see and acknowledge it. What are you, Atheist, or some other philosophical system?

• 
  @Llyod2238 ай бұрын

  Hey look at the fakehood .its a fake tablet .thst is religious stragedy taking a picture with himself making u to believe Hmmmm he is a holy man.too much fakehood around these men they wuickly will find faults of others its is a distraction for one to believe this man or pastor is holy.not so..its a religous strategy ..this man is religously desd .have no spirit or annointing to prove his claim only because he is self made..whenever God calls a man the devil tremble and run.God let the world knows his hand is upon this individual .look alll the disciples of jesus how they been used by God.is God dead that He won't use this man an others if they erre His. he gone for a walk is this man abscent .KZread hatching so much fake hood false pastors..its even a shame to mention there names...Acts 3;6..that verse shows it to VODDIE BAUCHAM .

• 
  @selenasimmons30489 ай бұрын

  But you also have to worship Jesus in order for you to get into the kingdom of heaven, because Jesus has said multiple times the cannot come on to the father except through me Jesus said that

• 
  @thelawofworship9 ай бұрын

  Very true indeed

• 
  @gemmagnolia9 ай бұрын

  I can listen to this man's voice, that God uses to read his truth to us by everyday all day. He and MacArthur are my favorite pastors via KZread. Lord please bless these men who you picked to lead others home! ❤🙏 Amen

• 
  @thelawofworship9 ай бұрын

  Amen

• 
  @Llyod2239 ай бұрын

  This is how he makes his money.ttaking a sripture verse and runs into many sections he voddie calls sermons.that not the way of the LORD...when will u PEOPLE the Audiences figure out this man ..????

• 
  @thelawofworship9 ай бұрын

  You don't think his preaching is Biblical?

• 
  @gadgetsandeats23259 ай бұрын

  Amen brother!

• 
  @thelawofworship9 ай бұрын

  Amen

• 
  @gwynthh175610 ай бұрын

  Amen!!!

• 
  @thelawofworship10 ай бұрын

  Amen

• 
  @Llyod22310 ай бұрын

  This man voddie Baucham .is playing with.minds of others.in the psalms it tells u.how to worship and prase the Lord..when a man isn't annointed .thst man voddie Baucham .can't tell u how to worship ALMIGHTY GOD .or even minister to of the Lorf.what he will do and does is oasd on his own understanding what he thinks about the SCRIPTURES he read.he used his spirit .yiu.HSS to discern the DPIRIT of the man VODDIE .many of u msy not be grounded strongly in the Lord.even u hearing about tbe Lord its not by the SPIRIT of truth..vodfie mouth isnt clean in other words not holy. Its dangerous allowing such a man to.lay hands on you..

• 
  @eddiesanch44410 ай бұрын

  I love Voddie's preaching, he is one of my favorites but I beg to differ on this one. Anyone who worships on Sunday is following commandments of men (Roman church) as they have admitted themselves to have, without any authority from scripture changed the holy day from the seventh day to the first leading the body of christ to an antichrist doctrine that was never commanded by Jesus or any of the apostles of the early church.

• 
  @thelawofworship10 ай бұрын

  Agree 💯

• 
  @Llyod22310 ай бұрын

  That is how this man VODDIE BAUCHAM. does make money create a subject runs it into consecutively. To make money.the oeople need to learn this man type of religous behaviors..then he sells it .what a smartman pretending to be a servant of the Almighty read your bible there aint nk law of worshipping. Read your psalms children God already let u no how to worship him....run from this man Voddie baucham..i calked him a RELIGOUS SMART MAN... .

• 
  @thelawofworship9 ай бұрын

  There is definitely a law of worship

• 
  @Llyod22310 ай бұрын

  Voddie baucham. Who u intend to fool .you yourself dont no what u saying .you was never thought by God otherwise u wont be on so much foolisness...Godfearing people..GO TO THE PSALMS IT TELL U HOW TO WORSHIP GOD. FOLLOW JESUS AND THE SPIRIT OF GOD WILL GUIDE U..VODDIE BAUCHAM IS A DECIEVER OF THE TRUTH..HE IS DANGEROUS ..SOON HE WILL ANSWER TO THE ALMIGHTY GOD. THIS MAN HAS A DARK COVERING UPON HIS FACE.if manh of u pray diligently u will see that dark cloud upon this man Voddie baucham..

• 
  @Llyod22310 ай бұрын

  This man voddie baucham is religiously dangerous. I am worried to the believers who listen to him he is a type of Jim Jones in this age

• 
  @thelawofworship10 ай бұрын

  @@Llyod223 We must know the TRUTH and it will set us free and guard against such deception. Thank you for your comments.

• 
  @Berean_with_a_BTh11 ай бұрын

  There is no scriptural support for the imputation of: 1. Adam's guilt or sin nature to anyone; 2. our guilt to Christ; or 3. Christ's righteousness to us. These are just inferences Calvinists and others have imported into Scripture (i.e. eisegesis) to support their doctrine. What we do see, though, is that faithfulness to God was reckoned to Abraham as righteousness (Romans 4:3, 9, 22). See also Romans 4:5-6 for righteousness on the basis of faithfulness being imputed to others also. Moreover, 2 Corinthians 5:21 says Christ was _made_ sin for us (not that our sin was imputed to Him) and that we _become_ the righteousness of God through union with Christ (not just have it imputed to us). See also Romans 3:22; 5:19; Galatians 3:13 & Philippians 3:9. The language of 2 Corinthians 5:21 suggests Christ was made a sin offering (a sacrifice for sin), as per John 1:29; Ephesians 5:2 & Hebrews 9:26.

• 
  @thelawofworship11 ай бұрын

  Thank you for your comments

• 
  @michaelmcevoy927810 ай бұрын

  Do you recall the scapegoat on the Day of Atonement from the Old Covenant? The high priest would place his hands upon the head of the scapegoat and transfer the sins of the nation of Israel to the goat, which was then driven out into the wilderness. That is a type that points forward to the reality of our sins being placed upon Christ on the cross. Peter tells us that He bore our sins in His body on the cross (1 Peter 2:24). Romans 5 clearly says that all men are guilty because of the 1 trespass (showing that we are imputed Adam's guilt and sin nature) and also that righteousness comes from God as a free gift. But God cannot lie. He can't simply wink at that which is unrighteous and call it righteous. Therefore: Scripture CLEARLY says that Adam's guilt and sin nature are passed on to all his progeny. Scripture CLEARLY says that our guilt is imputed to Christ. I will grant you that the imputation of Christ's righteousness to us is somewhat less clear than your #1 and #2, but it is still the clear teaching of Scripture when the totality of God's Word is understood.

• 
  @Berean_with_a_BTh10 ай бұрын

  ​@@michaelmcevoy9278 Nice try, but Jesus wasn't sent away alive like a scapegoat (cf. Leviticus 16:7-22) but was sacrificed as the sin offering (Hebrews 13:10-13) and Romans 5:12 says nothing about Adam’s guilt or sin nature being imputed to anyone. The early church believed infants were born innocent. It was only after infant baptism was introduced that a doctrine of original sin was invented to support the practice. Indeed, before Augustine, the only early church writers claiming infants were born in an inherited sinful state were Carthage and Augustine’s contemporary, Jerome. Against them were Aristeides of Athens, the writer of the _Epistle of Barnabas,_ Hermas of Rome, Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, Gregory of Nazianzus, Gregory of Nyssa, John Chrysostom and the writer of the _Apostolic Constitutions_ all of whom viewed infants as being born innocent. Augustine argued that the sin of Adam - including the guilt for it - is inherited by all humans ( _Letter_ 55.8; _Letter_ 164.6, 19; 250.2). Fundamental to Augustine’s hermeneutics was his belief that the practice of paedobaptism necessarily evidenced a tradition based on revelation to the church through Scripture and it was his job to identify the relevant Scriptures. The core of Augustine’s argument supporting paedobaptism was that Adam’s sin was inherited, an argument he largely based on an interpretation of what he _knew_ from Ambrosiatser's _Commentaries on Romans_ to be a Latin mistranslation of Romans 5:12b, which construed Adam as the one ‘in whom’ all sinned ( _A Treatise Against Two Letters of the Pelagians_ 4.7). When we come to the Reformation, we find Luther (an Augustinian monk) uncritically adopting Augustine’s teaching and Calvin endorsing Luther. Calvin openly admitted his theology was entirely Augustinian, writing, _"Augustine is so wholly within me, that if I wished to write a confession of my faith, I could do so with all fullness and satisfaction to myself out of his writings"._ What has passed down to us from Adam is the collateral consequences of Adam's sin. This is no different than if you or I were to be convicted of a crime and imprisoned for it; we would be punished but our dependents would also suffer as a result. What Adam’s descendants inherited from Adam as a result of his sin was his mortality and what they lost was access to the Tree of Life. The doctrine of Original Sin is a plain contradiction of Ecclesiastes 7:29. What Scripture clearly shows is that human sinfulness arises during one’s youth (Genesis 8:21; Jeremiah 3:25) and that children must reach a certain level of maturity before they are able to make moral choices between good and evil (Isaiah 7:15-16). Furthermore, since the human spirit is not inherited from one’s parents; rather, but is given to each person individually by God (Ecclesiastes 12:7; Hebrews 12:9), it is unreasonable to suppose it is any less pure at conception than the source from whence it comes.

• 
  @norenedixon769011 ай бұрын

  Yes the sabbath is Saturday God don’t change people do the Catholic Church change it to Sunday

• 
  @thelawofworship11 ай бұрын

  indeed, God does not change.

• 
  @rickyturner897411 ай бұрын

  "promo sm"

• 
  @thelawofworship11 ай бұрын

  ??

• 
  @anydaynow11 ай бұрын

  Now who knows which day is the Sabbath? Odds are, none of you. Here's a hint. You can't tell it using a manmade calendar.

• 
  @thelawofworship11 ай бұрын

  Hmmm 🤔 yes you can.

• 
  @anydaynow11 ай бұрын

  @thelawofworship m.kzread.info/dash/bejne/dHaKr6Zshqirk5M.html&pp=ygUDV2xj The lunar calendar is God made. Man just wrote it down. The gregorian calendar is manmade. Therefore inherently flawed.

• 
  @disciplemike110 ай бұрын

  no calendar needed. it is as simple as counting to 7. 1,2,3,4,5,6,Sabbath. There has always, always been a remnant guarding and keeping the count. no calendar needed.

• 
  @thelawofworship10 ай бұрын

  @@disciplemike1 exactly so

• 
  @issa476711 ай бұрын

  God's not real

• 
  @thelawofworship11 ай бұрын

  Prove it

• 
  @CuriousAldo10 ай бұрын

  @@thelawofworship prove that unicorns are not real...

• 
  @thelawofworship10 ай бұрын

  @@CuriousAldo Why would I need to. They don't concern me one bit. Just like Santa Claus. The mere fact that you and others go so hard against the idea of God shows me that there is more to your protests.

• 
  @CuriousAldo10 ай бұрын

  @@thelawofworship there is ,of course. Years being controlled and lied to. It's all made up!

• 
  @CuriousAldo11 ай бұрын

  Why would god need to rest? Answer: God is man made.

• 
  @minister.WayneScott11 ай бұрын

  The fool has said in his heart, "There is no God." They are corrupt, and have done abominable iniquity; There is none who does good. 2 God looks down from heaven upon the children of men, To see if there are any who understand, who seek God. 3 Every one of them has turned aside; They have together become corrupt; There is none who does good, No, not one.

• 
  @thelawofworship11 ай бұрын

  @aldomendesmartins the word translated rest also means to cease. God doesn't need rest because He is tired. He stopped to enjoy His creation and draw close.

• 
  @giggitygoo67510 ай бұрын

  This is the same brain that tells u it’s ok for you to cut your dick off and be a woman.

• 
  @CuriousAldo10 ай бұрын

  it's man made@@thelawofworship ... the anthropomorphism is so obvious. Stop with excuses. It's man made.

• 
  @thelawofworship10 ай бұрын

  @@CuriousAldo okay

• 
  @sotmh777511 ай бұрын

  Today's strong rebellion in the world against God is but another after effect of the many churches weakness via insistance of allowing the world instead of God to define us. "We" have adopted the worlds view of GOD. A powerful being created by us. It's character and nature are: weakness, cowardice, narcissism, pride, lack of love of the truth, selfishness. Embrace any one of these spiritual cancers and you can build your own god who will be more than happy to validate your fatalistic error. As Paul once sort of said: " Oh America, who has bewitched you?" Unlike what Flip Wilson used to say"the devil made me do it", on the contrary he just agreed with our desire to self destruct at the expense of satisfying the addiction that humanity suffers since the begining of time: The Need For Instant Gratification. Antidote to this literally damning desease: Take a daily dose of Psalm 51 very seriously. A broken spirit and a contrite heart followed by a shot of Holy Spirit Anointing oil while worshipping in Spirit and In Truth to show us how holy God is and how wretched we are. Warning: the side effect is eternal-------> In His presence, life for ever more. Seek The Truth, The Truth and nothing but the Truth cause it's not good morality, an idea or theology. The Truth is a person. His name is Jesus. Hallelujah Jesus is God. And that medicine heals everything. And as Paul Harvey used to say : "and now you know the rest of the story" in case you didn't know why things are so bad and what to do if anything? Now You Know?

• 
  @Berean_with_a_BTh11 ай бұрын

  Taken as a whole, the New Testament is unequivocal in its support for the Christian observance of the Biblical sabbath, which ran from sunset on Friday to sunset on Saturday. For example, expecting sabbath observance to continue until the end times, Jesus - the Lord of the Sabbath (Matthew 12:8; Mark 2:28; Luke 6:5) - told his disciples to pray that, when they see the abomination of desolation standing in the holy place, their flight not be on a sabbath (Matthew 24:15-20). In Acts 13:42-48, jewish and gentile converts alike observed the sabbath. When writing to _gentile_ Christians in 48AD, the Council at Jerusalem noted: “from early generations Moses has had in every city those who preach him, for he is read every sabbath in the synagogues” (Acts 15:21). At this early stage in church history, there was no New Testament for Christian congregations (which typically met in synagogues) to draw on. In Acts 20:7, the breaking of bread refers to the evening meal after the sabbath was over. Notice that the reference is to the Jewish 'first day of the week', which ran from sunset on Saturday to sunset on Sunday, and not to the Roman 'Day of the Sun'. Hence, the 'breaking of bread' was the Saturday evening meal. Acts 20:11 confirms that Paul departed at daybreak the next day. The clear implication is that, after observing the Sabbath then preaching on Saturday night, Paul's intention was to depart on Sunday morning - not to observe a Sunday sabbath. The offering referred to in 1 Corinthians 16:2-3 was not gathered during a Sunday worship service. Indeed, the text strongly implies that what was set aside was to be stored at home - not brought to the church on Sunday for collection at a church service. For Jews, taking up collections at a sabbath service was (and still is) offensive. The Apostle Paul - the apostle to the gentiles - consistently observed the sabbath (Acts 13:14 & 42-44; 16:13; 17:1-2; 18:4-11). After at least 15 years’ Christian ministry, Paul declared: “Neither against the law of the Jews, nor against the temple, nor against Caesar have I offended at all” (Acts 25:8), meaning he still kept the sabbath. Although Romans 14:5, Galatians 4:9-10 and Colossians 2:16-17 are often used to claim sabbath observance has been abolished, it is far from clear that the sabbath-observing Paul was referring to the _weekly_ sabbath in any of those passages (note that none of them refers to _the_ sabbath). In Romans 14:5-6, for example, the concern is whether one should fast on certain days, not with sabbath observance. Galatians 4:9-10 concerns the observance of other dates in the Jewish calendar. Note that the weekly sabbath isn't mentioned. Similarly, Colossians 2:16-17 - which contains the only sabbath reference in the entire Pauline corpus - concerns _a_ sabbath, not _the_ sabbath. In any event, the context is given by Colossians 2:8: _See to it that no one makes a prey of you by philosophy and empty deceit, according to human tradition, according to the elemental spirits of the universe, and not according to Christ._ In other words, Colossians 2:16-17 concerns human traditions that are "not according to Christ", which clearly does not apply to the institution of the sabbath in Genesis 2:3. What Colossians 2:16-17 tells Christians is that they can safely ignore non-biblical sabbaths and non-biblical rules about the sabbath. Hebrews 3:11-4:11 deserves special consideration, as the textual nuances are often missed when relying on a translation. In Chapters 3 & 4, the writer employed the verb καταπαύω (katapauó) and noun κατάπαυσις (katapausis), both referring to 'settling down, colonizing', as well as, figuratively, 'ceasing' (Hebrews 3:11, 18; 4:1-8, 10-11). In the Septuagint, with which the audience would have been familiar, κατάπαυσις (katapausis) spoke of the rest to be attained by settlement in Canaan. The allusion is evident in the writer's citation of Psalm 95:8-11, which is itself an allusion to Exodus 17:1-7 and Numbers 14:28-30. This rest, the writer tells us, is the same kind of endless rest God enjoyed when He had finished creating (Hebrews 4:3-4). The writer tells his audience that the Israelites of the exodus could have found such rest in God's grace in Canaan had they but trusted Him. The same kind of rest is promised to Christians but, just as the Israelites failed to attain it, so could they (Hebrews 4:1-3). God's rest is something Christ has entered (cf. Hebrews 1:3; 10:12) and which Christians are to "strive to enter" (Hebrews 4:10-11). Note well that Hebrews 4:3 does *not* say: "we who have believed _have entered_ that rest". Few Christians would argue that God has already given them permanent rest from physical labor (cf. 2 Thessalonians 3:10-12). That rest will not be attained before the millennium. Of particular note is that the writer switched to σαββατισμός (sabbatismos) in Hebrews 4:9 when saying _"there remains a sabbath rest for the people of God",_ before switching back to telling them to strive to enter the as yet unrealized κατάπαυσις (katapausis) rest. That σαββατισμός (sabbatismos) rest is a direct reference to the weekly שַׁבָּתוֹן (shabbathon) sabbath rest (cf. Exodus 16:23; 20:8-11) and is but a foretaste of the promised future rest. There is no suggestion in either the Old Testament or the New that the weekly sabbath could have become God's promised rest in Canaan. In other words, the writer says in Hebrews 4:9 that the weekly sabbath remains in effect. In Revelation 1:10, the reference to the Lord’s day does not necessarily mean Sunday. Once again, it at most means after the sabbath was over (e.g. Saturday night). In any event, it is not referred to as a day on which believers had some kind of gathering; indeed, all it tells us is that John was 'in the spirit' on that day. It may also be just another way of saying 'the day of the Lord', which is how the ISV translates it. Although Jesus is often said to have broken the sabbath (Matthew 12:2, Mark 2:24; Luke 6:1-2; John 5:19; 9:16), thereby abolishing it, what He in fact did was to assert His authority over it (Matthew 12:8; Mark 2:28; Luke 6:5), restore its observance to its proper basis (Mark 2:27) and confirm the true scope of what could be done on that day (Matthew 12:10-12; Mark 3:3-5; Luke 6:6-10; 13:10-16; 14:1-6; John 5:2-18; 7:23, 9:1-34). The earliest _possible_ reference to Sunday worship comes from Ignatius in 110AD who wrote of Jewish converts: “no longer observing the Sabbath, but living in the observance of the Lord's Day” ( _Letter to the Magnesians_ 9), but see my comments re Revelation 1:10. The earliest _clear_ reference to Sunday worship is found in the _Epistle of Barnabas_ (c.120), I which the writer says: “Your present sabbaths are not acceptable to Me… we keep the eighth day with joyfulness, the day also on which Jesus rose again from the dead”. Note the antisemitism already creeping into the church. Justin Martyr (c.140) wrote of “memoirs of the apostles” being read on “the day called that of the sun” alongside the “writings of the prophets” ( _First Apology_ 67). Many others also wrote of Christian worship on Sundays well before the 4th century; and of other Christians who continued to worship on Saturdays. Conspiracists - especially from the SDA - love to blame Constantine and the Roman Catholic Church for changing the sabbath from Saturday to Sunday when, in fact, the change from sabbath observance to Sunday worship began centuries before either existed. Although Constantine made Sunday the official Roman day of rest (in 321AD), doing so merely facilitated what was by then a widespread, centuries-old, majority Christian preference in the western Roman Empire for worshiping on Sundays. The Council of Laodicea (c.363/4) tried (unsuccessfully) to stamp out sabbath observance by anathemetizing anyone who worshipped on Saturday. Again, this was long before the RCC came into existence - in the eastern part of the church. As late as the 5th century, Socrates of Constantinople and Sozomen cite the seventh day as the Christian day of worship except for Christians in Rome and Alexandria. Just as the institution of marriage as the union of one man with one woman is grounded in creation (Genesis 2:23-24; Matthew 19:4; Mark 10:6-9) so too is the sabbath as a day blessed and hallowed by God grounded in creation (Genesis 2:3). Those who assert that the sabbath has been abolished are, in effect, denying Jesus' lordship (Matthew 12:8; Mark 2:28; Luke 6:5) over that day. The denial of the sabbath's applicability to Christians is just one product of the apostate 'American Gospel'.

• 
  @thelawofworship11 ай бұрын

  Very well stated

• 
  @jon23carter11 ай бұрын

  Amen

• 
  @maryleibfried210411 ай бұрын

  💯

• 
  @theminutemen127511 ай бұрын

  Love Voddie!

• 
  @rudytorres991011 ай бұрын

  I always tell people that the reason why I don't claim to be a Catholic anymore is because I read the bible and catholicism just doesn't fit the word.

• 
  @thelawofworship11 ай бұрын

  Praise the Lord

• 
  @boaz6311 ай бұрын

  This almost seems to disagree with what he said recently about The Chosen being a second commandment violation... 🤔🙏

• 
  @thelawofworship11 ай бұрын

  I think he had a deeper consideration between the two sermons. This proceeds the larger series.

• 
  @tonimccleveland5014 Жыл бұрын

  Yes Amen

• 
  @thelawofworship Жыл бұрын

  Amen

• 
  @antoniosoria3039 Жыл бұрын

  Don't live your life based on gossip this is what you're doing when you live your life based on the... An example of that is when you read the New testament it always starts out according to Matthew , Luke. or Mark this let you know that is been ridden in the not an eyewitness...

• 
  @thelawofworship Жыл бұрын

  Okay, I think I get the point you are trying to make

• 
  @Gods-women-of-war Жыл бұрын

  Amen ❤❤❤❤‼️

• 
  @thelawofworship Жыл бұрын

  Amen 🙏🏾

• 
  @ruth8583 Жыл бұрын

  Thank you for truth❤

• 
  @thelawofworship Жыл бұрын

  Praise the Lord. Please share with friends 🙏🏾 so the truth can spread

• 
  @MrIYahRas Жыл бұрын

  For I honour and bless yah Voddie. Great man of God, continue to do the will and great works of God. Job well done they good and faithful servant ✡✡✡✡ #VoddieB.👑

• 
  @thelawofworship Жыл бұрын

  Pray for him

• 
  @FMSax Жыл бұрын

  Galatians 2:19-21 NIV 19 “For through the law (I died to the law) so that I might live for God. 20 I have been crucified with Christ and I no longer live, but Christ lives in me. The life I now live in the body, I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave himself for me. 21 I do not set aside the grace of God, for if righteousness could be gained through the law, Christ died for nothing!”

• 
  @thelawofworship Жыл бұрын

  Amen

• 
  @FMSax Жыл бұрын

  Galatians 2:19-21 NIV 19 “For through the law (I died to the law) so that I might live for God. 20 I have been crucified with Christ and I no longer live, but Christ lives in me. The life I now live in the body, I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave himself for me. 21 I do not set aside the grace of God, for if righteousness could be gained through the law, Christ died for nothing!”

• 
  @FMSax Жыл бұрын

  Galatians 2:19-21 NIV 19 “For through the law (I died to the law) so that (I might live for God). 20 I have been crucified with Christ and I no longer live, but Christ lives in me. The life I now live in the body, I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave himself for me. 21 I do not set aside the grace of God, for if righteousness could be gained through the law, Christ died for nothing!”

• 
  @FMSax Жыл бұрын

  Galatians 3:24-25 ESV 24 So then, the law was our guardian until Christ came, in order that we might be justified by faith. 25 But now that faith has come, we are no longer under a guardian,