I discuss modern warships, naval aviation, and related topics, with a focus on China and sometimes other nations.
Excuse my strange accent. I am originally from Taiwan.
Please consider donating to my channel on Patreon, Buy Me A Coffee, or Paypal (see links at bottom of the page).
Пікірлер
If there is one ship that China builds, that is definitely better than Western (U.S. especially) countries as of now. It's their destroyers. As good as the Arleigh Burkes are, the Type 052's have much better offensive capabilities and AESA radar. AD capability to me as of now is equal. Though the Flight III AB's do have AESA, they lack the hypersonic missile capability Chinese destroyers will (and already have) get. Let's not forget the MAJORITY of Arleigh Burke's are Flight l and II's, which have PESA. The U.S. Navy still lacks a hypersonic missile, though it is planning to test them on one of the 3 Zumwalt-class in a few years. I expect a good 6 to seven years of testing before the U.S. gets a hypersonic missile into service and of enough numbers.
Russian Warships Will Make Excellent Artificial Reefs In The Black Sea 🌊 🇺🇦🇺🇸 😎
this was a total failure ,,can`t launch aircraft..there is not enough electrical power...these people really fucked up...most are now not alive,,they had accidents...
Sukhoi is pronounced "Sue-hoi" the K is silent. Only culturally illiterate Americans say "sue-koi"
Smokers of China, ASSEMBLE!
只是太監的成人玩具，而已！
What a major joke! All ballistic missiles have terminal velocity in hypersonic range. There is nothing new here. What you are seeing here is a dumb ballistic missile with possibly a MaRV or not even that. Likes to SM-3 will make short work of this "weapon". It is similar to overhyped Khinzal Russian "hypersonic" missile, which ukraine intercepts every now and then. Just a different launch platform.
we are so back
Looks like Sweden’s Visby corvette to me
Schwesterschiff der Spanischen Principe de Asturias. Mit Harrier Jagdbomber.
they studied our carrier (Melbourne) for over 20 years and learnt a lot about how they worked
Visby class?
It looks like, they try to copy US Zumwalt class. Doesnt have much defence. If they planning on using it to attack Taiwan. You better have some great defence turret. Doesnt look like a deep sea water ship.
好闷的声音😢
謝謝！
Thanks man!
Ear to ear missiles, jokes aside did not mention the Su-27, Su-30 and Su-35s that PLAAF and PLAN operate
He still speaks more languages than you
I think this Chinese narrator has been smoking way too much of that Chinese fentanyl. When the latest missiles are shot out of the arleigh burkes they will more then make up for anything that China thinks they have better then the United States!! Go America go❤❤!!!
055 is not designed to protect the aircraft carrier, it's the other way around, time to change the game.
China in few words: New GLOBAL leader of TODAY ❤!
How embarrassing! The temu packaging got stuck on the airplane in the thumbnail
No.
China: if they can't copy the shape they will not build it. China thinks that coping the shape means they have copied the design and what they produced something that is equal to what they copied. All that coping the shape means that created a stage prop. Remember that all these new systems are under development by a country at has had a problem with developing new technology. China has been good at production of civilian developed technology designed in other countries. Those two thing are very different.
Sejong the great😂What is great🙃
Obviously China is tired of being pushed around, after a two centuries of misery they’re obviously done. And who could blame them? They apparently are seeking to match the U.S. in every way, weapon for weapon. Although I’m no fan of the CCP I’m also not a huge fan of the way my own country is currently being managed. China’s military developments are impressive. That said, I still think the USA has an ace up its sleeve, what that is, well, that’s anyone’s guess but it’s probably something out of a science fiction movie. We need a diplomatic solution before a war breaks out. Once it starts it will be next to impossible to stop.
The author Eurasia Naval Insight is inviting you to view the following video about China's Type 076 LHD: kzread.info/dash/bejne/gp-LzsqindeTc5c.html
One is a destroyer the other is a cruiser A very powerful destroyer but still a destroyer It has served our navy well It works in conjunction with a carrier strike group It has years of naval doctrine and strategy It has patrolled the worlds oceans and kept the peace how many years The other is a beautiful ship of beautiful design Similar capabilities Yet to be tested via military doctrine Have we seen this before Yes we have When Where
that sub looks like a cruise boat... oversized missiles
CHINA RISING 2025
Ew why do you talk like that?
The most interesting part about the J-20 is the fact that it is a delta canard stealth fighter. What a lot of people do not know is that the J-20 is a multi vortex airplane. Vortexes over a wing create a suction effect that increase lift, increases the angle of attack at which the air start separating from the wing. This is so crucial that many modern fighters uses all kinds of tricks to create vortexes over their wings. Why delta wings are so good is because it naturally create these vortexes because of the way the wing is angled backward. LERX as seen on jets like F-18, the Sukhois all have LERX to create these vortexes. F-16s are actually cropped deltas. Another way to create vortex is to use canards. This is why delta canards are so popular and such a superior configuration. The delta wing is coupled to the canard and they work together to increase the overall maneuverability of the jet. The LERX on the J-20 is itself a vortex generator as you can see in many J-20 videos. What most people don't understand is that unlike the Eurocanards, the J-20 is a canard is positioned more forward from the delta wing as a loose coupled delta-canard and this is done so because of the combination with the LERX. Most of the vortex over the main delta wing is generated by the delta wing itself and the LERX. The canard also generate vortexes but they go over the main delta wing loosely and thus create even more suction effect that allows the J-20 to hit such high AOA despite being such a large plane. The vortexes from both the LERX and the canard also hit the vertical stabilizer at the back. This means the vert stab also benefit from the suction effect of a vortex, which reduces turbulence and increases its flight control authority. Having the canard as a control surface also allows the vertical stab to be much smaller, compared to fighters like F-22 and F-35 which needed the large vert stabs to create the same amount of control. The vert stab surface areas are huge radar reflectors at many angles, a fact that many Americans just hand wave away. It is also why the J-20 does not need the heavy thrust vectoring with more points-of-failure like the F-22 to achieve the same level of maneuverability. When you think about it, it really shows just how much innovation has gone into the J-20 aerodynamics design that allows it to be a stealthy delta canard without losing its maneuverability that comes naturally from being a delta-canard. Delta-canard give superior control over conventional configuration. What the people at Chengdu really did a great job at designing the J-20 and incorporate the natural advantages of the delta canard while not sacrificing its stealthiness. It also shows just the immense expertise over these aerodynamic concepts and engineering the designers have.
That is why the US 6th gen aircraft tend to have a similar wing planform to that of J-20 (without vertical tails though). This is the best wing planform for jet fighter I think.
@@kalas2320 first off, you've never seen a US sixth Gen aircraft. So there's that. Secondly the Chinese Bomber unveiled earlier this year is as close as they could get it to cloning a US B2 bomber, a bomber which the US has already replaced and which is nearly 35 years old. So the idea that the US is copying Chinese design is wild. Also canards are bad for stealth compared to traditional stabilizers. That's because when you have a rotating surface like a canard out front when a radar wave hits it, even if the canards themselves are stealthy the leading edge breaks up and sends the radar return wrapping around in ways that are unpredictable across the full range of moment from the full range of possible radar directions. But if the stabilizer is the last thing with nothing behind it then it doesn't matter. The most likely reason for the canards is the j20 engine. Canards increase lifting over standard verticals and China is still forced to use old Russian engines (though they did recently steal some US B2 bomber engine tech, which fair enough, espionage is a thing) Everyone including the US is struggling to meet the demands of generating enough electrical power for all the sensors and radar and computers and communications equipment onboard while also providing the thrust needed to propel the aircraft in a reasonable package. China has much worse engines and so it saved on lifting force to help power more stuff. As to why they didn't just increase wing surface area, they want to be able to fit it on a boat.
@@kalas2320 where did you see it? AI generated images? XD
@@sparkzbarca I never say they copy each other. Copying an existing aircraft is far more difficult than developing it from scratch if you know how aircraft design works. According to the program Next Generation Air Dominance (NGAD) fighters, Boeing and Lockheed Martic have shown their conceptual configurations for the 6th gen aircraft. Yes, I saw them from news, which nowadays is not a reliable source anymore. But the thing is a 6th gen fighter will be flying-wing-like rather than a conventional cofiguration like F-22 or F-35 because very low observability (VLO) is the first priority. The J-20 configuration is arguably the best jet fighter wing planform aerodunamically. Unlike J-20, the canards and stabilisers of 6th gen fighters are foldable and used only when supermaneuverability is needed. I think the Chinese's 6th gen is gonna have similar configuration and concepts. They are now catching up with the US. Both countries have done much research on flying wing configurations (see X-56A from Lockheed Martin's youtube channel). The main issue is its stability from missing vertical stabilisers and structural flexiblity. So, there have been research topics like aeroservoelasticity, body freedom flutter, etc. I won't say they copy each other but there definitely are best aircraft configurations for a given mission and flight conditions requirements. A stealth bomber will just look like B-2 if you focus on VLO. They and other top countries know what to do but it depends on who have enough budgets, manufacturing capability, and human resource.
@@sparkzbarcasuddenly, everybody's an aeronautical engineer. WTF do you know about Chinese engines? If their automotive engines are anything to go by, one realises why the EU is so fretful. Let's not even go into US engine production!
Its all copy cut.
there's no copycut, maybe the design has similarity because if you look at some WW2 airplanes from german, britain, usa they have some similarities. But the internal is always different in every airplane
@@siboyyy1056 hahahaha not a good example
❤❤👍👍👍👍❤️❤️
They can't even fly them. Gk fcks have to recruit American pilots to fly them lol
As a Chinese, I would say this is probably fake, its hull number does not conform to the naming standard of PLAN
Jahil desh ka faltu kabar
Looks like copy swedish visby class
J-20 was named Fagin for its NATO report name. Westerners and their antisemitism reaching its normal levels as always.
Do you have a video about most advance Electronic Countermeasures on ships?🤔
Another pathetic Chinese propaganda video. I guess if your military is a paper tiger you have to try and make people believe that you are stronger then you really are. All bark and no bite!!!! Free Tibet Free Hong Kong Taiwan is a country and isn’t a part of China Free Uyghurs Free the people of China from the CCP
Look at this barking dog. Woof woof 😂
Cope 😂😂😂
This ship has resemblance to Zumwalt destroyer. China is a hope for poor countries. Don't take me wrong. Wheel is already invented, so no need to invent again. Just make it more long lasting. That's it.
Great channel about interesting videos