Yellen can have the gut to ask China to stop overcapacity UMAV

@Bonjour-vw7wb

Ай бұрын

That old white hair witch since think that they can tell the world what they can or can’t do.

@feixie3181

9 күн бұрын

她就是个小丑

This drone is more capable than whole indian airforce fr 💀

@spencer7404

Ай бұрын

But not their motorcycle special force. 🏍

@srijanme

Ай бұрын

@@spencer7404 cause their motorcycle fuel run on cow pee bahahaha

@andrewzhang2928

Ай бұрын

NO! India NO.1

@srijanme

Ай бұрын

@@andrewzhang2928 half of the Ind shite on the streets. Yeah they are No. 1 😂😂😂😂

@honesty_provides_tranquility

Ай бұрын

Unmanned yet still has a toilet onboard ….

Elegant aircraft, and yet another Chinese-built aerial asset, which if needed can be built far more cheaply and quickly than manned aircraft. Each flight adds to the experience of operators, and possibly also contributes to any associated AI flight management systems.

@kapitankapital6580

Ай бұрын

The biggest cost for any air force has always been trained pilots. Drones potentially allow for countries to maximise their productive capacity without that bottleneck in translating it to air power

@gumpyoldbugger6944

Ай бұрын

@@kapitankapital6580 Depending on the fighter type, it costs the USAF between USD6.5 Million to USD13.2 Million to train a pilot.

@jaihindersingh

Ай бұрын

Weeak cpp tofu droon wiil faal out of skaii ownselph, Amerikka jaas laaf an suer wiin 😂

@miscbits6399

5 сағат бұрын

@@gumpyoldbugger6944 Not to mention that because drones are "expendable", they don't need life support, ejection seats, etc etc etc) It becomes a virtuous circle which makes mass producing specialised items economic and puts those who rely on "all eggs in one basket" approaches (eg: F22/F35) at risk of spending themselves to death

China's UAV technology is just really impressive !

@andrehunter1295

Ай бұрын

Responsible politicians in Washington don't care, They are much more afraid of Chinese modernized weather balloons, they are really nasty and dangerous 😁

@mark-1rc502

Ай бұрын

To me it looks. Blatant copy of a US global Hawk

@Flightman453

27 күн бұрын

@@mark-1rc502It’s a drone. How much different can you make one? Grow up.

@fernandofernandito3055

25 күн бұрын

​@mark-1rc502 the glo bel hawks look like a whale size compared to PLA UAVs slim like seal

@feixie3181

9 күн бұрын

​@@mark-1rc502，保持你的傲慢，事实会让你清醒

China has the right to defend itself!

@chad_dogedoge

Ай бұрын

From what ??? The territory they claimed are 1000 km from the mainland and its not even their territory.

@JiyangChang

Ай бұрын

​@@chad_dogedoge So you also believe Malvinas Islands belong to Argentina?

@Wvk5zc

Ай бұрын

​@@chad_dogedoge free hawai. Free okinawa

@mw0062

Ай бұрын

From new Nazi axis​ US JP PHL@@chad_dogedoge

@harrylo2316

Ай бұрын

Might is right. Best form of defence is offence.

At 10 miles altitude, the horizon is 283 miles away. That’s 250,000 square miles of surface within direct line of sight. Surveillance planes spaced 500 miles apart would provide continuous coverage with no gaps

@EthanX1ao

Ай бұрын

wtf is a mile i only know kilometers

@pajeetkumar1645

23 күн бұрын

Saaar miles are freedom units.

Russia and China have an open sky agreement where China can access the Sea of Japan through Russia.

@user-mc2oc6jw9q

Ай бұрын

Looks like a copy, ohh that's because it is a copy

@jasonjin5253

Ай бұрын

@@user-mc2oc6jw9q stay salty 😂

@williamgoquay5475

Ай бұрын

Obviously everything's a copy of a copy of a copy ..........like wheels and paper are used hundred thousand of time since its invention

@user-mc2oc6jw9q

Ай бұрын

@@williamgoquay5475 and just because it is a copy, does not mean it is as good as the original

@user-mc2oc6jw9q

Ай бұрын

@@jasonjin5253 Salty, LOL... copying is the highest form of flattery, C C P are not capable of making anything themselves so they compliment the west be trying to (and failing) to copy

My man, as always Awesome presentation!

Thank you for consistently providing very detailed and timely weapon information.

Perfect timing. I just watched a vid by Inside China Business. In it Kevin talked about how Ukrainian and Israeli army prefer to use off the shelf DJI drones vs US military drones. I was asking myself if the civilian drones are that much better than US drones, how good are the PLA drones! 🎉

@xsu-is7vq

Ай бұрын

PLA probably use off the shelf DJI drones as well. Civilian drone designs are updated every few months, while military drone designs are set a few years ago at the earliest.

@camt8804

Ай бұрын

Doesn't have to be good. Just cheap and will last 2 hours before being blown up.

@loktom4068

Ай бұрын

Only some parts are off the shelf, while the rest are on a higher level design and materials.

@112313

Ай бұрын

​@@xsu-is7vqthey don't. They might have dji design and build specialised versions for the pla....

This video is actually genuinely underated and damm and this is actually the actual real China that the actual American and British BBC propaganda mainstream media actually don't show you is actually really like and actually capable of actually doing and damm and 🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳

@ulikemyname6744

Ай бұрын

And Global Times always show you the truth

@Will.i.am55555

Ай бұрын

Now we know why the 🇺🇸 pacific fleets are always at least 1000km away from China shores😂😂😂😂😂

@ulikemyname6744

Ай бұрын

@@Will.i.am55555 If Japan and Okinawa are 1000km away then sure

@camt8804

Ай бұрын

@@Will.i.am55555 The Taiwan strait isn't that far away

@johnsmith1953x

Ай бұрын

@@Will.i.am55555 Well this and the 100,000 land-based carrier killer missiles china always has aimed at them!

China must be given utmost respect for it's a real super power.

The “soaring dragon” WZ7 reconnaissance UAV can fly at hypersonic speed at an altitude of 20 km for a long time which enable it to detect any American war ship heading towards Taiwan long before it is even within the sight of the island. It gives the essential information in the “kill chain” of the PLAN command to destroy the enemy’s ships with hypersonic missiles.

@tvgerbil1984

5 күн бұрын

What kind of engine these WZ-7 UAVs have in order to reach hypersonic speed (i.e. Mach 5 or above)?

@philiptan2051

5 күн бұрын

@@tvgerbil1984 at that altitude it must be driven by a supersonic ramjet engine, not a turbofan or alike.

@tvgerbil1984

5 күн бұрын

@@philiptan2051 The WZ-7 does not appear to have a ramjet engine or an airframe capable of substaining hypersonic flight. Perhaps you meant WZ-8 which has much cleaner aerodynamics for substained hypersonic flight but has to be air-launched from a bomber.

@philiptan2051

5 күн бұрын

@@tvgerbil1984 who cares for what kind of code the UAV is given. It is not the code that matters but the capabilities of the UAV.

@Knight766

2 күн бұрын

None of what you said is even remotely true.

Well done China PLAAF SuperPower. 💪💪👏👏👍👍💯💯♥️♥️

This video is actually genuinely underated genuinely underated and damm and this is actually the actual real China that the actual American and British BBC propaganda mainstream media actually don't show you is actually really like and actually capable of actually doing and damm and 🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳

@tzenzhongguo

Ай бұрын

Go back to China to come to Australia, NEw Zealand, USa, and Canada mainland loyalist shitbag.

Nice!

1,4 Billion well trained, DICIPLINED Chinese Citizens HOw FAR CAN they Go!!!

Great video. Great plane.

China uses a high orbit geosyn satellite for 24/7 monitor of the seas in front of China. This sat is supplemented by low orbit high res satellites, AWAC's and drones to monitor US Navy traffic.

Can you contact these drones with a radio like you can with manned planes? Because if you warn them before blowing them up, if there is no one to hear the warning..

Whoever sparked the arms race is a true genius as well as a friend of humanity and a real understander of the philosophy of life 😅

bad guys have nowhere to hide.

@ahmadalastal5303

Ай бұрын

bad guys: Americans

@justme6275

Ай бұрын

@@ahmadalastal5303 🤣🤣🤣👍

To deter and certainly defeat.

I wonder how much effort is put into the looks of these things. Is it important, that they look good and menacing?

@thefeof6161

Ай бұрын

I think this could bé the case for ground or water vehicles, to fly however, youd have an important trade off by trying to make it look cool. Moreover, being stealth and curvy makes it look cool, but its like that for aerodynamics and radar avoudance capabilities

@constantinethecataphract5949

Ай бұрын

​@@thefeof6161 you don't avoid radar with curves you use angles. That's why the f 22 looks so angular

@thefeof6161

Ай бұрын

@@constantinethecataphract5949 the curvy was in relation to aerodynics, but cool to know

@monipenny408

Ай бұрын

nothing can compare with U$ weaponry, most are at least $1 mill even the missile used to destroy the balloon costing about $5k Now you know why U$ needed trillions and trillions of military spending. A military bullet in the U$ is $100 dollars each, in the shop it's about 2 dollars!

@taiwanstillisntacountry

Ай бұрын

Is that why little-D-boi's country does not have proper🚽🚽🚽?

God bless the killchain!

@hongjian3714

Ай бұрын

It's more than a killchain now. It's a killweb. Something that will still work, even if a chainlink is taken out.

@camt8804

Ай бұрын

I'm sure they are praying it will work.

Does China have any fully stealthed drones to perform a similar role? Long-duration, long-range maritime surveillance seems like the kind of role that is perfectly suited to a stealth drone. I know there's the GJ-11, but that's a combat drone, right?

@EurasiaNaval

Ай бұрын

WZ-8 fits that description, although GJ-11 could theoretically be used. There's the limitation with having to launch the WZ-8 from a H-6N bomber at an appropriate speed and altitude, at least according to leaked US-sourced documents.

@Wvk5zc

Ай бұрын

@@EurasiaNaval is WZ-8 one-way drone? Once you launch then it wont come back?

@233gushi4

12 күн бұрын

@@Wvk5zc It is easy to interpret.China has ability to product it cheaply,which even is cheaper than missle that shut down it.And,No oneoutside of them can kown real content about it. 实话说，我们都不知道

Taiwan is colored differently from the mainland on the map you used at 7:18. Careful, your bias is showing... 🙄

@TheOtakuPrince

29 күн бұрын

Well, his Taiwanese by the way. So...

Very nice copy! It's the invisible that counts...

Any reconnaissance drone tasked with tracking a carrier group really needs to be stealth. Without stealth, they would be very vulnerable to a F-35. The drone may within range to detect, but would not be able to track a carrier group before it was shot down.

@tvgerbil1984

Күн бұрын

Stealthy definitely, maybe high supersonic or even hypersonic at high altitude too to get away from intercepting missiles ..... apparently, the Chinese AVIC WZ-8 Unmanned surveillance drone has those characteristics.

In addition to submarine tracking, satellite tracking, and military/ civilian intelligence, these drones in relay mode also track aircraft carriers. The surveillance of the US aircraft carriers is near 100%. In the age of hypersonic missiles, any carriers are sitting ducks. Carries have excellent but limited defense capabilities, but offense slightly has the edge. Can a carrier survive a swamp of 1000 thousand decoyed drones, jets, and 100 hypersonic miles at 1/30 of the cost of a carrier? There is practically no technological gap. If China sinks the US carriers, then what's next?

Thi Chinese drine might be compared to the US MQ-4 but appears to more closely resemble the MQ-9 in design. The supported swept wing is an odd choice for a reconnaissance aircraft because it trades lift for speed which is normally undesirable. Also, the RQ-4 has an ummensely larger engine shtoud which could house a larger engine or do more thermal obfuscation. The chinese drone uses a much older turboprop design and be far more detectable than American drones. Before considering things like special materials, construction and EW systems, IMO this Chinese drine likely is using very ancient technology as a base starting point

@douginorlando6260

Ай бұрын

The supported swept wing is structurally more rigid than a traditional straight wing. This translates to either a wider wing span or a lighter wing. It’s a good design approach and will lead to a much wider wing span in the future. Wider wing span will improve lift, especially in thin air at a reduced airspeed. Reduced airspeed will improve drag and allow improved engine thrust per horsepower expended. A future design will likely fly higher, slower, longer, farther. At 10 miles altitude, the line of sight to the horizon is 283 miles. This increases substantially at higher altitudes. A more powerful radar with a larger antenna will likely be included to monitor surface ships hundreds of miles away.

@loktom4068

Ай бұрын

Wrong, America just started their kindergarten drones manufacturing after 3 years ago by backward engineering the Chinese drones after Donnie Dumb Dumps Dumps the contract and restrictions on importing Chinese military technology and parts. How do you like them apples joes ?

For April fools joke you should pretend to unveil the weather balloon drone and its long range surveillance capability to survey entire US.

I somehow doubt that the global hawks electronics have been standing still since 2007. As you would expect from any major country.

Freedom of navigation

Doctrine wise, it seems like China is strengthening its area/sea denial capabilities. Hypothetically, if China were to invade Taiwan, it would want to prevent any other nation from interfering with its operations. By having a MALE UAV providing guidance for anti-carrier missiles makes a lot of sense.

Drone Easy Fast Cheap. Carrier Difficult Slow Expensive. Carriers Sink.

@tangbesitangbesi7009

Ай бұрын

Yes, agree

China's carrier hunter drone should be WZ-8 hypersonic UAV.

It has wings and an engine, so it must be a replica from some country

"Xizhang, also known as Tibet in english" Absolute BASED

👍

I'm still waiting for my tactical air balloon. Some countries have a fear of ballons. 🎈🎈🎈

Looks like US designs made 30 years ago. Pretty cool though.

Greed and evil will not prevail yet remember that Bois!!

Soaring Dragon or Wallowing pigeon? Time will tell.

@supahsmashbro

Ай бұрын

Underestimating China has done us wonders every time doesn't it? Lol

drones are the future, i wouldnt want to be a carrier.

No need for slow moving mannrd AWACs.

I made a fake drone model once as well

America can decide which is preferable: China's export of industrial overcapacity in consumer goods, or a massive and sustained Chinese military buildup.

This video is actually genuinely underated and damm and this is actually the actual real China that the actual American and British BBC propaganda mainstream media actually don't show you is actually really like and actually capable of actually doing and damm and ❤😂🎉🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳.

@theinfralink6598

Ай бұрын

Actually you are right

exc.

come on China surely you have satellites for that.....

Ayaaah, little-D-boi's having heart-pains and pulling out their hair out of jealousy in the comment section.😂😂😂

Chinese and russian bots are busy in the chat🤖

china numba one btw

when ppl say US has the strongest military, wrong, to be exact is US has the strongest defense, china by far has the strongest attack force

@darrellsey

Ай бұрын

It's funny, just like in American football everyone thinks the second string quarterback is better. But there's a reason that first stringer was in there in the first place. Any technology that America boasts about only means they are seven steps ahead of that tech already. The F35 has weapons that they're not even allowed to use yet because they are so secretive and powerful. And that goes with a Ford class carrier they would not put them In harm's Way if they were so easily sinkable

It's better to use the word 'loong' instead of 'dragon'. They are totally different creatures with huge difference between them. There is not a dragon that exists in Chinese culture

@user-me4tj9re7m

Ай бұрын

Of course, there are dragons in the ancient culture of China. It's just that Chinese dragons are different from Western dragons. Chinese dragons have no wings, while Western dragons are dinosaurs. Western dragons are dinosaurs. The Chinese dragon symbolizes auspiciousness and respect, while the Western dragon symbolizes darkness and evil.

@Wvk5zc

28 күн бұрын

what do chinese call western dragons in mandarin?

@user-me4tj9re7m

28 күн бұрын

@@Wvk5zc Of course, this plane is named after the Chinese dragon. The Chinese dragon does not exist in the real world at all. Unlike the Western dragon, it is actually a dinosaur, so it is named after the Chinese dragon. But the Chinese dragon has no wings, while the plane has wings, so it is called a pterosaur. The name of this plane means a dragon with wings.

@tvgerbil1984

Күн бұрын

It is hard to prove that they were totally different creatures scientifically. Nobody has ever found the genes of a loong to compare with the genes of a dragon yet. The word dragon in Latin was draco which meant "huge serpent". Maybe modern Western culture has already misrepresented dragons as dinosaur-like creatures.

They all have the same They are from the second world war

looool

Doubts this works

@saadman920

Ай бұрын

😂

Why china n usa drone, jet n a lotsss of stuffs LOOK almost the same😮, they must really like each other 😅🤭😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣

China Innovative 🇨🇳🌏🌍🌎🐼 but not for Myanmar Military Council 👍

Chinas drones can hunt fisherman😅😅😅 there just good at bullying

China made low quality realtalk 😅

@MJ-revered

8 күн бұрын

Bot

Statements galore 🎉, micro actions, too weak to fight for what is right - shameful

Are you sure its name is soaring dragon and not flying stinky shyte?

Chinese trolls wer ya at? Just because it looks the part does not mean it does the part, y'all know UAE sold all the chinese drones they bought because they are fallin apart after a few years of usage..😅

@supahsmashbro

Ай бұрын

China scares you 🤭🤭

@dual5ivese7ens

Ай бұрын

@@supahsmashbro yeah, they cook with gutter oil over there.

@Ram-mm6ge

21 күн бұрын

Ukrainian and russian troops don't think so

in wartime, easily destroyed

@chingtuckmeng1122

Ай бұрын

by throwing darts?

@kapitankapital6580

Ай бұрын

Sure, but they can put out a lot of them, which is key.

@user-uy9zm8sf2y

Ай бұрын

Lol even Ukrainian and Israel are using dji drones and those drones are not military grade drones those drones are lay mens drone and they have been very effective in the war lol

@gumpyoldbugger6944

Ай бұрын

that is one of their purposes, to take the hits that would of otherwised cost an aircrew.......drones are easily replaced, air crew not so much. And given their expected stealthy nature, might be a bit harder to kill then one would imagine......plus swarms of the buggers could in theory overwhelm even a fleets anti-air defence....

@gumpyoldbugger6944

Ай бұрын

@@kapitankapital6580 and all they have to do is send a signal with GPS data back to their controllers sayng "Lookie wot I've found out here!" Job done, even is it gets smoked the next second or two.

the "ctrl c + ctrl v" nation

@albback8176

Ай бұрын

How so? There are clearly visible differences on the craft, especially the wing and engines.

@ulikemyname6744

Ай бұрын

@@albback8176 Ahahaha sure dreamboi

@liesterminator153

Ай бұрын

​@@ulikemyname6744I'm sure u are exact copy of a bab00n

@desapressado

Ай бұрын

@@ulikemyname6744 cope

@Wvk5zc

Ай бұрын

@@ulikemyname6744 says a baboon

Europe is like 2 generations behind China when it comes to Drones.

plastic drone that dont even tested

China is still not strong as usa As long as The usa states Japan south Korea tiwan Philippin ) still surrounding china

@capdew

Ай бұрын

That is the proof that US cannot match China, that's why they have to form street gangs to counter China but u know street gangs usually get their ass whopped real bad 😂

@supahsmashbro

Ай бұрын

Yes but there's a limit how much those countries will help. They're quite suicidal to help America but not as much as people think

@mohamedayman5666

Ай бұрын

@@supahsmashbro states not countries

As nice as it is, the US is at least a decade ahead in UAV technology, and that’s being generous, more likely 20+ years.

@yiquny

Ай бұрын

You can make it sound more impressive if you use 100 years

@JD-dm1uj

Ай бұрын

@@yiquny That wouldn’t be accurate, though the truth hurts, my friend.

@yiquny

Ай бұрын

@@JD-dm1uj it doesn't matter whether it is off by 20 years, or 100

@hbc511

Ай бұрын

Iran hacked the mq4 reaper, so much for advanced technology. More like gar bage

@Wvk5zc

Ай бұрын

talk about ignorance lol

Cheap copy of usa drone😂

Japan's F15 could only take photoes from under, what a beauty

@gumpyoldbugger6944

Ай бұрын

Because they had no call or right to shoot it down as it wasn't violating their airspace. It has every right to be flying there as much as the JSDAF F-15's or any US drone. Isn't International Airspace a bitch at times?

@MarvinChenFantasy

Ай бұрын

​@@gumpyoldbugger6944You know the pilot was at the limit when he had to zoom in for a vague photo.

@hongjian3714

Ай бұрын

This drone probably flies higher than the F-15J.

@gumpyoldbugger6944

Ай бұрын

@@MarvinChenFantasy while that maybe true, it still should of been in range for a missile strike, however as I said before, the pilot had no legal cause or case to launch one at it.

@gumpyoldbugger6944

Ай бұрын

@@hongjian3714 but most likely not out of range of an air launch anti-aircraft missile.

Mashallah

Lol how embarrassing, not only do they copy the design, but even the exact paint color and US air force logo! 😂

@user-ew5eh2co5p

Ай бұрын

Get out and see the world. The Chinese drones are way ahead of American versions. Ask the Ukrainians and Russians.

@MelonHead887

Ай бұрын

@@user-ew5eh2co5p haha you big time clown. China nor the ignorant russkie slavs have a chance against mighty America. US thought about conquering China and setting up hqters in the forbidden city, but decided it's not worth it since we have all ur girls anyway. 🤣

@Wvk5zc

Ай бұрын

@@MelonHead887 blah blah blah. Just another keyboard warrior. Bet you chicken out to your momma first when the war breaks