How do I upload a 3D model to the 3dsky website for sale? How do I set the selling amount? Where do I set the price?
@AGU_VDB2 ай бұрын
Please I need help with my cgtrader When ever I upload my models on cgtrager it saying pending on the status
@The_homeless762 ай бұрын
Did you solve it?
@emmanouilfilippou46233 ай бұрын
Thanks for the detailed tutorial and knowledge transfer!!! How long did it take you to complete the whole process? And how much would you sell this, and how many do you expect to sell? It looks like its not really worth the effort, but does it? Thanks!
@surimunguia3 ай бұрын
Tutorial
@program24455 ай бұрын
Thank you bro ❤
@polyforge3d5 ай бұрын
Good one, makes quiet a difference, thanks!
@colonel74596 ай бұрын
How
@spiritswitchboard6 ай бұрын
@CGTrader is holding my last royalty payment hostage until I sign up with the dysfunctional hyperwallet that they are forcing onto all of their artists! I already deleted ALL of my 400+ models off their site and hope more artists are doing the same! THIS COMPANY IS A SCAM!
@WillPreston3D7 ай бұрын
it looked like RC got the highest fidelity but I've heard it does a kind of cheat where it assumes dark lines are recesses so you get more detail faster but its less accurate? it did look best here though. also this vid is 2 years old, does anyone know if there has been any significant progress amongst these tools?
@oldleaf37559 ай бұрын
thank you
@baldergg9 ай бұрын
which sites do you recommend for selling ? specially for textures tileables, for engines.
@clayworley218410 ай бұрын
Hey Carlos, first of all that scan you imported looked very bad anyway nice video and thanks for the info.
@MegaXowen Жыл бұрын
Thanks for such a cool vid. Really helped me figure out my designs
@feklee Жыл бұрын
Why process the RAW files? I use Zephyr, and I throw the RAW files directly into it. It always comes out nice, even if the RAW files look very dark (because I generally expose for highlights). Normally, the more data the better.
@CR3DT Жыл бұрын
What viewer did you use at the end ?
@iamrelient3011 Жыл бұрын
When I click workflow there is no gnerate dense cloud option. Do you know why that would be?
@GB3DBLENDER Жыл бұрын
This is the real important content right here!
@DurgaPrasad-ks9em Жыл бұрын
may I know what software did you use?
@mohsenhaddadi1117 Жыл бұрын
3df zephyr then zbrush
@DurgaPrasad-ks9em Жыл бұрын
May I know what photogrammetry software did you use and is there any other best photogrammetry software for Windows in 2023? Please reply...
@lightdarkstudiodinali9310 Жыл бұрын
Does it need any specific requirements before uploading your model ?
@tebans88 Жыл бұрын
no more tan 5GB
@constantinosschinas4503 Жыл бұрын
Reality capture is blazing fast. You made it produce 10 times more polygons than the others. As others say, this comparison is of little or no use.
@f-act10418 ай бұрын
Normally you would simplify the model and reproject the texture of the high poly model
@constantinosschinas45038 ай бұрын
@@f-act1041 Indeed. The comment was a about photogrammetry speed vs originally derived polygons/fidelity.
@loganpubg3488 Жыл бұрын
How long time it take for payment agreement, pending for review.
@albertes99 Жыл бұрын
Hi! Thanks for the comparison! Do the photos from the Canon 77D need to be geotagged? I know that the drone photos are geotagged, but I'm not sure that the Canon 77D has a built-in GPS
@dr20231may Жыл бұрын
I love 3df Zephyr free edition....so much
@TheSatzy6699 Жыл бұрын
Great content and explanation
@titoenko864 Жыл бұрын
Does cgtrader apply sales tax on their end or do we have to take care of it and pay tax to according state/country?
@ggfraga Жыл бұрын
Ja tentei fazer meu rosto 3d uma vez, mas sem sucesso kkkk que camera vc utilizou?
@PunxTV123 Жыл бұрын
do I need iphone with lidar camera?
@sierraecho884 Жыл бұрын
This is pretty awesome. Also great quality just from 55 Smartphone pictures. I usually take more than 300-400 pictures.
@sierraecho884 Жыл бұрын
This is great, I always struggle in Photogrammetry with not enough light.
@olividsmeme7482 Жыл бұрын
Do you need a 3D printer
@MarinusMakesStuff Жыл бұрын
But which one was faster? :)
@MarinusMakesStuff Жыл бұрын
Good comparison. At work we use a 3D scanning camera with depth sensors and a rotating platform. With this setup we can make higher resolution scans than these programs in a fraction of the time (5 minutes is enough for a high quality scan). The downside is that it requires a lot of setup and the scanning space is limited to small objects, no larger than a 150x150x150mm box. You can go larger, but because of the depth of field of the camera you will lose detail. Everything has drawbacks and it's still a search for which scanning techniques work the best. We are now looking for a handheld scanner since the iPad with surface scanner is crap. It's a fun gimmick, but those iPads just don't deliver good files.
@sierraecho884 Жыл бұрын
Why are you not going with structured light ? That´s what we use professionally. It far superior to any of these methods.
@sierraecho884 Жыл бұрын
what I have noticed is, depth maps usually gives me meshes with less high frequency noise while dense cloud especially on high or ultra high is very noise even after cleaning the dense cloud via confidence filter. So dense map result is a lot cleaner. I just wish I had more control over it (in the dense cloud you can filter out any point you want).
@sierraecho884 Жыл бұрын
You should update this experience with the new Agisoft version. I am still not sure If I should use Deph Maps or Dense cloud, in the end I try both which takes even more time xD
@TommyLikeTom Жыл бұрын
geez, nice. I have sold a few handfuls of models but nothing like this
@isabelleportail8829 Жыл бұрын
J utilisé 3dfzephir que je trouve mieux pour sa vitesse....pour les filtres afin d optimiser au mieux pour l export sur les softs 3D, car besoin d assets et donc une optimisation importante pour garder la texture sans faire de retopologie dans le soft 3D
@rogerharsh Жыл бұрын
I have made Audi R8 v10 plus highly detailed model which took me 1.5 months to make , priced only at 19$ , but can't see any sales , only one sale happened when I personally messaged one..
@kaizendigital_id Жыл бұрын
I think it's too niche model. try to make generic asset pack like medieval props and environment, or stylized environment which has more market.
@anonymouse527 Жыл бұрын
How did it go man, did you diversify your models? I'm thinking of giving it a shot too.
@mobayguy Жыл бұрын
Thank you - Excellent video
@CarlosFaustino Жыл бұрын
thank you😀
@unrealdevop2 жыл бұрын
Say I just got a Nikon D800 and when I import the RAW images the resolution is read as some tiny resolution like 100x50 or something ridiculous like that and the actual resolution is 7360x4912. Any idea what would cause this? I'm thinking importing it into photoshop and exporting it as TIFF may fix it? I already removed the photos, but I'll try that later.
@CarlosFaustino2 жыл бұрын
That is weird... Arent you uploading just the images thumbnails?? Dont know really... But try to do it, go through Photoshop just to check if everything is fine
@unrealdevop2 жыл бұрын
@@CarlosFaustino Thanks for the response, I'll have to drag the photo's back off. I realized that I was using an F-Stop to small so none of the images will be usable anyway due to blurring around parts. With that being said they were around 50mbs each and I did check them by opening them and looking at them and there didn't seem to be anything wrong with them.
@CarlosFaustino2 жыл бұрын
That is weird then... But anyway, check if it was just a glitch or if it continues that way, check for a trial on another software with the same dataset just to be sure
@unrealdevop2 жыл бұрын
@@CarlosFaustino Alright I'll pull one back off and try it again.
@unrealdevop2 жыл бұрын
@@CarlosFaustino Ok so this worked for me. Maybe it's my cameras older .RAW format that it doesn't like Idk. What I did is opened it in photoshop and after I was done modifying the color settings on it I saved it as a DNG after that the photo loaded properly...you were right it was loading the actual thumbnail not the image. it was 160x120 in size.
@vannikuhs6742 жыл бұрын
𝕡𝕣𝕠𝕞𝕠𝕤𝕞 🏃
@3DDivision2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for sharing your knowledge : )
@CarlosFaustino2 жыл бұрын
you're wellcome 😉
@elliotth302 жыл бұрын
Could do with some sound in the video and would also love to this print in SLA if you do more like this, love this work you've done. Got yourself a subscriber. Look forward to the next video!
@CarlosFaustino2 жыл бұрын
Noted!😉
@plentyfacts83012 жыл бұрын
Hello, I have a rather urgent question. I performed a "low" quality treatment (cloud, alignment...etc). If I want to switch to "high" quality, is there a way to reuse the work done in low quality to reduce the working time or do I have to redo everything from the beginning in high quality? Thanks.
@CarlosFaustino2 жыл бұрын
sorry for late response... well, you can use only the depht maps that were calculated.. eventually you would need to redo only the "mesh part"
@DATECStudio2 жыл бұрын
You don't need make dense cloud in Metashape
@CarlosFaustino2 жыл бұрын
yeah, it was discussed on my other video 😉
@andresestevez27012 жыл бұрын
una duda no veo de modelos complejos cuanto puede ser......si un poquito aumenta o no.....
@CarlosFaustino2 жыл бұрын
Não percebi, podes explicar melhor?
@andresestevez27012 жыл бұрын
pensé que nunca responderías,......fui rechazado supongo por muy simple que es,, queria saber que tipo de modelos piden para entrar, es decir como debe ser tu portafolios ideal, lo otro era he leido muchas cosas negativas de esta pagina solo hay una positiva, a un asi me interesa probar pues si no entonces no hubiera gente aqui ya vi sus estrellas a full nivel no veo esos artistas mucho qujarse pero no comentan nada queria saber donde puedo ver los parámetros que como hay presentar el modelo, no pude encontrar esta información solo quejas. Lo ultimo quice decir en tu video no veo el precio de modelos complejos cuanto es el costo es decir de aquellos modelos que son para 5 dias o 20 dias, que precio tiene.......esito seri si se entiende un like sino, por lo menos lo intente gigi no mas, un saludo y si te animas un video de widcat explicando esto o u enlace no veo mucho contenido de esta pagina.....
@CarlosFaustino2 жыл бұрын
@@andresestevez2701 não sei se consegui perceber tudo mas cá vai a resposta do que consegui perceber, os modelos ou o portefólio ideal para o cgtrader tem a ver com a procura que existe. Tens de perceber o que é que as pessoas mais estão a procurar e tentar oferecer isso mesmo. Quanto às críticas, bom, quando comecei a vender modelos, o cgtrader era a plataforma que mais oferecia ao criador. Eu neste momento recebo cerca de 74% de cada modelo, há outros sites que vendem também mas o criador recebe muito menos . Nunca tive problemas com eles e pretendo continuar nesta plataforma. Espero que tenha conseguido explicar melhor.
@andresestevez27012 жыл бұрын
Consegui achar o idioma, achei que era brasileiro XD, queria te dizer se você já modelou modelos mais complexos para o pagamento, me parece que você ganha muito pouco, mas também os modelos não parecem difíceis, não importa, mais ou menos entendi a onda mas gostaria de saber algo mais direto por favor, como é a ideia do perfil que a CGTRADER quer e se aceitam payoneer
@CarlosFaustino2 жыл бұрын
@@andresestevez2701 basicamente todos os modelos que lá estão são feitos através de fotogrametria, alguns são mais complexos do que outros, mas nada de muito difícil. quanto ao payoneer, sinceramente não estou a par disso, normalmente sou pago através de paypal e tem funcionado sempre bem :) espero ter ajudado e respondido
@danielbilhau2 жыл бұрын
Ola Carlos. Parabéns pelo trabalho 👌
@CarlosFaustino2 жыл бұрын
😉🍸
@johannmuller36082 жыл бұрын
Hi, i watched a few videos of you also the one where you compare to meshroom which did not work at all, and i wanted to point you to getting rid of the turntable for making the Imagesets. Those Softwares also rely on things in the background to reference to which they simply cannot do on a turntable, give it a try you will get better results.
@CarlosFaustino2 жыл бұрын
Well, since most of my turntable objects are masked out, then the software only relies on the object itself. And that has some disadvantages of course but also gets you amazing results... Check my cgtrader profile, 80+ objects done with turntable 😉
@puzzlemagnet19572 жыл бұрын
26 dollar a month>? with 90 assets, hahaha fuck cgtrader, no thank you
@CarlosFaustino2 жыл бұрын
well.. it all depends on the assets that you make... certainly there are a lot more people earning way more than me
Пікірлер
hello which camera you used for this project?
How do I upload a 3D model to the 3dsky website for sale? How do I set the selling amount? Where do I set the price?
Please I need help with my cgtrader When ever I upload my models on cgtrager it saying pending on the status
Did you solve it?
Thanks for the detailed tutorial and knowledge transfer!!! How long did it take you to complete the whole process? And how much would you sell this, and how many do you expect to sell? It looks like its not really worth the effort, but does it? Thanks!
Tutorial
Thank you bro ❤
Good one, makes quiet a difference, thanks!
How
@CGTrader is holding my last royalty payment hostage until I sign up with the dysfunctional hyperwallet that they are forcing onto all of their artists! I already deleted ALL of my 400+ models off their site and hope more artists are doing the same! THIS COMPANY IS A SCAM!
it looked like RC got the highest fidelity but I've heard it does a kind of cheat where it assumes dark lines are recesses so you get more detail faster but its less accurate? it did look best here though. also this vid is 2 years old, does anyone know if there has been any significant progress amongst these tools?
thank you
which sites do you recommend for selling ? specially for textures tileables, for engines.
Hey Carlos, first of all that scan you imported looked very bad anyway nice video and thanks for the info.
Thanks for such a cool vid. Really helped me figure out my designs
Why process the RAW files? I use Zephyr, and I throw the RAW files directly into it. It always comes out nice, even if the RAW files look very dark (because I generally expose for highlights). Normally, the more data the better.
What viewer did you use at the end ?
When I click workflow there is no gnerate dense cloud option. Do you know why that would be?
This is the real important content right here!
may I know what software did you use?
3df zephyr then zbrush
May I know what photogrammetry software did you use and is there any other best photogrammetry software for Windows in 2023? Please reply...
Does it need any specific requirements before uploading your model ?
no more tan 5GB
Reality capture is blazing fast. You made it produce 10 times more polygons than the others. As others say, this comparison is of little or no use.
Normally you would simplify the model and reproject the texture of the high poly model
@@f-act1041 Indeed. The comment was a about photogrammetry speed vs originally derived polygons/fidelity.
How long time it take for payment agreement, pending for review.
Hi! Thanks for the comparison! Do the photos from the Canon 77D need to be geotagged? I know that the drone photos are geotagged, but I'm not sure that the Canon 77D has a built-in GPS
I love 3df Zephyr free edition....so much
Great content and explanation
Does cgtrader apply sales tax on their end or do we have to take care of it and pay tax to according state/country?
Ja tentei fazer meu rosto 3d uma vez, mas sem sucesso kkkk que camera vc utilizou?
do I need iphone with lidar camera?
This is pretty awesome. Also great quality just from 55 Smartphone pictures. I usually take more than 300-400 pictures.
This is great, I always struggle in Photogrammetry with not enough light.
Do you need a 3D printer
But which one was faster? :)
Good comparison. At work we use a 3D scanning camera with depth sensors and a rotating platform. With this setup we can make higher resolution scans than these programs in a fraction of the time (5 minutes is enough for a high quality scan). The downside is that it requires a lot of setup and the scanning space is limited to small objects, no larger than a 150x150x150mm box. You can go larger, but because of the depth of field of the camera you will lose detail. Everything has drawbacks and it's still a search for which scanning techniques work the best. We are now looking for a handheld scanner since the iPad with surface scanner is crap. It's a fun gimmick, but those iPads just don't deliver good files.
Why are you not going with structured light ? That´s what we use professionally. It far superior to any of these methods.
what I have noticed is, depth maps usually gives me meshes with less high frequency noise while dense cloud especially on high or ultra high is very noise even after cleaning the dense cloud via confidence filter. So dense map result is a lot cleaner. I just wish I had more control over it (in the dense cloud you can filter out any point you want).
You should update this experience with the new Agisoft version. I am still not sure If I should use Deph Maps or Dense cloud, in the end I try both which takes even more time xD
geez, nice. I have sold a few handfuls of models but nothing like this
J utilisé 3dfzephir que je trouve mieux pour sa vitesse....pour les filtres afin d optimiser au mieux pour l export sur les softs 3D, car besoin d assets et donc une optimisation importante pour garder la texture sans faire de retopologie dans le soft 3D
I have made Audi R8 v10 plus highly detailed model which took me 1.5 months to make , priced only at 19$ , but can't see any sales , only one sale happened when I personally messaged one..
I think it's too niche model. try to make generic asset pack like medieval props and environment, or stylized environment which has more market.
How did it go man, did you diversify your models? I'm thinking of giving it a shot too.
Thank you - Excellent video
thank you😀
Say I just got a Nikon D800 and when I import the RAW images the resolution is read as some tiny resolution like 100x50 or something ridiculous like that and the actual resolution is 7360x4912. Any idea what would cause this? I'm thinking importing it into photoshop and exporting it as TIFF may fix it? I already removed the photos, but I'll try that later.
That is weird... Arent you uploading just the images thumbnails?? Dont know really... But try to do it, go through Photoshop just to check if everything is fine
@@CarlosFaustino Thanks for the response, I'll have to drag the photo's back off. I realized that I was using an F-Stop to small so none of the images will be usable anyway due to blurring around parts. With that being said they were around 50mbs each and I did check them by opening them and looking at them and there didn't seem to be anything wrong with them.
That is weird then... But anyway, check if it was just a glitch or if it continues that way, check for a trial on another software with the same dataset just to be sure
@@CarlosFaustino Alright I'll pull one back off and try it again.
@@CarlosFaustino Ok so this worked for me. Maybe it's my cameras older .RAW format that it doesn't like Idk. What I did is opened it in photoshop and after I was done modifying the color settings on it I saved it as a DNG after that the photo loaded properly...you were right it was loading the actual thumbnail not the image. it was 160x120 in size.
𝕡𝕣𝕠𝕞𝕠𝕤𝕞 🏃
Thanks for sharing your knowledge : )
you're wellcome 😉
Could do with some sound in the video and would also love to this print in SLA if you do more like this, love this work you've done. Got yourself a subscriber. Look forward to the next video!
Noted!😉
Hello, I have a rather urgent question. I performed a "low" quality treatment (cloud, alignment...etc). If I want to switch to "high" quality, is there a way to reuse the work done in low quality to reduce the working time or do I have to redo everything from the beginning in high quality? Thanks.
sorry for late response... well, you can use only the depht maps that were calculated.. eventually you would need to redo only the "mesh part"
You don't need make dense cloud in Metashape
yeah, it was discussed on my other video 😉
una duda no veo de modelos complejos cuanto puede ser......si un poquito aumenta o no.....
Não percebi, podes explicar melhor?
pensé que nunca responderías,......fui rechazado supongo por muy simple que es,, queria saber que tipo de modelos piden para entrar, es decir como debe ser tu portafolios ideal, lo otro era he leido muchas cosas negativas de esta pagina solo hay una positiva, a un asi me interesa probar pues si no entonces no hubiera gente aqui ya vi sus estrellas a full nivel no veo esos artistas mucho qujarse pero no comentan nada queria saber donde puedo ver los parámetros que como hay presentar el modelo, no pude encontrar esta información solo quejas. Lo ultimo quice decir en tu video no veo el precio de modelos complejos cuanto es el costo es decir de aquellos modelos que son para 5 dias o 20 dias, que precio tiene.......esito seri si se entiende un like sino, por lo menos lo intente gigi no mas, un saludo y si te animas un video de widcat explicando esto o u enlace no veo mucho contenido de esta pagina.....
@@andresestevez2701 não sei se consegui perceber tudo mas cá vai a resposta do que consegui perceber, os modelos ou o portefólio ideal para o cgtrader tem a ver com a procura que existe. Tens de perceber o que é que as pessoas mais estão a procurar e tentar oferecer isso mesmo. Quanto às críticas, bom, quando comecei a vender modelos, o cgtrader era a plataforma que mais oferecia ao criador. Eu neste momento recebo cerca de 74% de cada modelo, há outros sites que vendem também mas o criador recebe muito menos . Nunca tive problemas com eles e pretendo continuar nesta plataforma. Espero que tenha conseguido explicar melhor.
Consegui achar o idioma, achei que era brasileiro XD, queria te dizer se você já modelou modelos mais complexos para o pagamento, me parece que você ganha muito pouco, mas também os modelos não parecem difíceis, não importa, mais ou menos entendi a onda mas gostaria de saber algo mais direto por favor, como é a ideia do perfil que a CGTRADER quer e se aceitam payoneer
@@andresestevez2701 basicamente todos os modelos que lá estão são feitos através de fotogrametria, alguns são mais complexos do que outros, mas nada de muito difícil. quanto ao payoneer, sinceramente não estou a par disso, normalmente sou pago através de paypal e tem funcionado sempre bem :) espero ter ajudado e respondido
Ola Carlos. Parabéns pelo trabalho 👌
😉🍸
Hi, i watched a few videos of you also the one where you compare to meshroom which did not work at all, and i wanted to point you to getting rid of the turntable for making the Imagesets. Those Softwares also rely on things in the background to reference to which they simply cannot do on a turntable, give it a try you will get better results.
Well, since most of my turntable objects are masked out, then the software only relies on the object itself. And that has some disadvantages of course but also gets you amazing results... Check my cgtrader profile, 80+ objects done with turntable 😉
26 dollar a month>? with 90 assets, hahaha fuck cgtrader, no thank you
well.. it all depends on the assets that you make... certainly there are a lot more people earning way more than me