Hi! I'm Anton Månsson! 3D Printing is my thing. I love making content about 3D Printing and believe that videos are a great way of showing you, the viewer how something works! In my case I love to create when I combine that with my interests in 3D Printers, 3D Scanners and other cool 3D Tech the end result should be quite entertaining and fun videos to watch.
With 14 years of experience with 3D Technologies and a bit of luck I might even teach you something interesting or give you my input on a question.
And please do just that. Ask me questions! Anything goes!
For review inquiries - www.antonmansson.com/review-guidelines
If you want to send fan-mail or products, please get in touch with us via the link above, at the bottom.
Пікірлер
out of all the scanners you reviewed, which one would you recommend for small-medium?
Do you think it is a solution to scan of horses hoof on the downside? Infekt i don't need a 3D Scan surface Scan to make a hoof shoe from that
Hi! I think you would be able to scan a hoof quite well actually. Specially if you only need to underside and not much up on the sides.
The 5m pro is an awesome printer. It prints better that my Bambu printer
The slicer for the 5m sucks
Flashprint can be a bit tricky yes. But you are able to run Orca as well if that suits you better :)
I am looking into 3D scanning and your presentation with it's cautious approach telling all of the possible pitfalls and not what to do gives me a much better idea of what it's all about. Great presentation - thank you!
What size is the holder screw for the tripod?
That is the standard camera/tripod diameter of "1/4-20 UNC" =)
Thank you
It’s Robbie rotten?!!
I printed out this thing, its really big in person. Im doing SLS and Space Shuttle next!
I have it for a month and scap it already. Its nozzle clogs so often and it broke its expensive nozzle. Watch out of this product. 👎
the problem is that these nozzle are very expensive compared to other printers
Yeah, it's more expensive than a standard nozzle, but it also provides better extrusion reliability thanks to the design. And the change process is much easier than an old nozzle design for example, where you heat up, use a wrench and accidently break your wires etc. But yeah, it's a higher running cost for reliability and ease of operation.
I have the regular 5m and it has been flawless out ofv the box. I really hope the release a larger version of it!!!
Awesome to hear! I hope more Get to explore the 5M!
whats is difference the nir or blue light tecnology as a consumer level ?
I can't understand you well with the background music. We don't need music, just content. :). thank you.
Can you share the valve scan?
I own TWO of these printers.. one with over 300 hours now and the other with 260 hours.. both printers have performed BEAUTIFULLY! I have had ZERO issues OR break downs.. I bought the smooth build plates for my machines as well as I still use the original textured plates for PETG and TPU.. everything else I print on the smooth plates as adhesion is insanely good. The only small issues Iv had so far is when updating my machines to the latest firmware.. as I update them right when the update comes out and both times there was some issues I had to deal with until FlashForge fixed it.. so don’t update as soon as you get the message.. rather wait a week or so before updating the firmware when it asks you to and you should be all set there. I have printed just about every type of material out there with these printers, ABS, TPU, Nylon, PLA, ASA, Carbon fiber PLA + PETG, regular PETG, and even Silk.. this printer on the stock settings has printed every one of them with out issue!! With TPU I print on the standard PLA setting and I turn retraction down a bit.. prints perfect every time and super fast. For PLA the only setting I keep changed is the bed temp.. they have it set too low.. set it to 60c and you’ll be good. Best printers Iv ever owned and blows all my friends out of the water with reliability and print quality!
I hear absolutely no difference between on and off
You can hear it in this video. The first value it tries for the y axis resonates through the table and you hear a loud bassy hum, the second value it tries removes the hum
@@evancoberley2650 I'm ngl I don't hear the difference. Even while mine did the calibration it sounded absolutely the same to me.
@@Mephora if you set it on a stable surface like concrete there won't be much noise to begin with
@@evancoberley2650 it's definitely noisy. It's on a hollow cabinet after all. So I wouldn't call that quiet depending on the frequencies. But as far as I know it's also only supposed to Actively cancel the noise of the motors not the resonance of the surroundings
@@Mephora it listens to how the frequencies of the motors affect the surroundings and reverberate through the table, because those reverberations go back into the printer and require input shaping to dampen
So its a junk for lot of money
I wouldnt say that! Its actually quite some scanner for the money. But it’s not a high-end scanner and you don’t get perfect results in real life scanning. Still incredible cheap for what many users need; reference surfaces, and not perfect copies.
I can help if you need an editor for free
Hur lyckas du mäta 25.49 med ett analogt skjutmått? :) Jag har varit sugen på en scanner länge och egentligen einstar men den kräver ganska mycket av din dator och dessutom måste den datorn vara en pc med ganska kraftigt nvidia-kort? Tänkte att mosse lite kunde vara perfekt för mig just för att hitta referensytor, avstånd, skruvhål etc. Hade du köpt en med den erfarenhet du har efter att ha använt den? Med vänlig hälsning,
Bra ögonmått ;). Nä men som jag säger så litar jag inte 100% på det skjutmåttet... Jag har inte kört någon budget-scanner via mobil ännu. Tycker det verkar otroligt osmidigt och bara problem med Apple telefon. För många skanners behöver du absolut ett nvidia-kort och en PC, det är svårt att komma runt så fort du ska behandla datan. Då har jag åtminstone inte sett något som inte kräver PC. Moose lite är billig och superbra sätt att komma in i 3D-skanning. Den kommer vara svår på större och vissa ytor med lite detaljer på, men då får man vara kreativ och hitta sätt att låta skannern tracka. Noggrannheten gör den ändå OK för mycket hemma-pill för den som skal bygga och meka och behöver information in i ett CAD system. För skruvhål så hade jag skruvat i skruvar/3D-print jiggar för att få saker som sticker ut (och därmed enklare att tracka/mäta i efterhand). Men ja, den är så pass billig att jag köpt en om jag inte redan haft andra skanners :). Den är däremot inte fantastisk på att ge dig en ren, färdig-städad mesh. Men för mått, referensytor och det du beskriver så gör det egentligen ingenting. Jag tror många kommer önska sig något "större" med tiden, för att ta in större modeller. Men då kommer de troligtvis också behöva betala mer, eller bara få lägre upplösning på delarna, då är det fint att "ha kvar" sin Moose/Moose lite för de små projekten.
@@3DPrintTechDesign tack för ditt svar. Om jag inte läser fel så ska Moose fungera på mac också så det är ju bra. Det är inte så att du har en enklare modell som du kan dela. Hade varit intressant att få upp den i fusion och se hur det ser ut.
ordered one using your code. this will be my first scanner.
Thank you Marc! Hope you enjoy it and find 3D scanning helpful and interesting :) Remember it can be a bit frustrating in the beginning until you get the hold of tracking objects :D Good luck!
I want to scan larger (up to 1500mm sqaure) but low detail items, would this be suitable?
Not if your items are low detail. This scanner has a narrower field of view and is focused on smaller items. Have a look at this one instead: geni.us/lynx3D. But with low detail objects you might have to prepare them anyways to track, it depends a bit. Send me an email from my website if you need more specific tips for your parts
is the scan file you are building off of avaialbe
Sorry, those files are long gone :/
Great video :) Have also heard a lot of people being confused about the P1P and the P1S and if the P1S reallt is that mutch better or not.
Segue
Great video, just what i needed to decide to upgrade! Not to good for my wallet tho ;) The main thing for me is that is is alot of duest in the room my printer stands and i think that will be solved with the p1s upgrade.
Thanks! And sorry to your wallet 🤪. The enclosure definitely helps with dust. And I suggest you run a dust filter if you use external spool!
I don't trust reviewers that have affiliate links to the products they review.
I understand. But I see it as a win win. In the case where I’ve made a difference, showing you the real value and features of a product, with good and bad, and you still wish to buy it, it’s a win win. It’s almost harder for you the viewer to click an affiliate link than it is to google the product anyway :). By being upfront and honest about the links and that they allow me to buy products to review, So you’re not only seeing what companies send out, we achieve better coverage. I hope to earn your trust, but I understand you might think my positives are biased when I use affiliate links. My mission is to be honest no matter what and I take inspiration from the big tech KZreadrs who, for good or bad, all use affiliate and sponsorships
@@3DPrintTechDesign either I miss the part in your video where you mentioned the affiliation / sponsorship of this product in your video or it wasn't in the video. If it was in the video it would help with providing transparency if you included at the beginning of your video. Don't think this isn't the wrong way as you did bring up some constructive criticism on the device It issues it has. But your reality is probably all software related since most of these scanners to needs very similar hardware but in the end it's the software that will make them for break them
You’re right, the software is critical and that’s why I’m quite harsh on this scanner and trying my best to put in the expectations. You see it on the Mole scanner review as well, where the hardware and software both operate worse than the moose. The review unit is a loaner, so it’s not a sponsored video in any ways. I will probably end up giving it away as they rarely want to return it to china due to shipping costs, even tho it’s in my terms. And I do call out that I have affiliate links to the product in the description. Thank you for the feedback, I’ll try to see what I can do to be even more transparent in the end :)
$499 flashforge adventurer 5m pro
They are fantastic, but nozzle since it is all in one is a weak point - "something" broke in mine and had to buy whole new one despite most of it for sure was ok.
Do you have an opinion to share on this Moose scanner compared to the Einstar by any chance?
I wish I had tried the Einstar myself! But I haven’t had the opportunity to do that yet. I have good connections that recommend it very well, but I don’t think they’ve tried budget scanners like revopoint and 3Dmakerpro to compare it either. The software for Einstar is probably better, but how the scan/track differs is probably not much of the field-of-view and etc. is similar. If I recall, the einstar is a bit more medium-format
@@3DPrintTechDesign I have one but the Moose looks to be much faster. My Einscan get "lost" very easily and hates most dark colors. It is also very slow even though I got the company to buy me a $4500 laptop to support it. I might just have to put in a requisition for the Moose pro and upload a comparison of my own LOL. I just want to make sure that I am using my "buy me this gizmo tokens" for work for a worthy cause.
Haha, yeah the dark scanning is actually mighty impressive on the moose lite. But with the other type of light on the “PRO” moose, you might have a different result. The tracking is probably not remarkable better. It could just be user experience and object, really. Scanning speed is probably better then if you feel so. I’m using a good Pc, but usb 3 port on the front, so no crazy usb speeds either.
As if speed wasn't a matter of knowing what to do on the slicer....
Hi, firstly I want to say that it's a great video you made with very useful information about the 5M Pro. I have an unrelated question to this print but I'm wondering where I can get the .stl files for the Formula 1 car you have in this video, is it possible to buy or download these .stl files
Thank you so much! The Formula 1 car is my buddy Daniel Noree's "Open RC F1" project. You can just search Open RC F1 on Thingiverse, Pinshape or printables and you should find it =).
@@3DPrintTechDesign Thank's
The creality ferret se scanner has color and is still cheaper. I wonder how well it the moose lite holds up scanner faces compared to it
You compared that to the "Moose Lite" when the Ferret SE's accuracy is only "Up to 0.1mm" compared to the Moose's set accuracy of "0.05mm @ 0.10mm Resolution"... and amazon has the Ferret SE Priced @ $319 compared to the pre order sale of Moose Lite @ $255 (prices vary with discount codes.) These 2 items are in different categories my friend.. not even comparable in software either.
looks interesting, I'm looking for a cheap 3D scanner to have a reference model from which I'd make a functional part in CAD
I have yet to see a 3d scanner that is worth the high cost of them.
Needs more room, and multiple color. Be great if they had the option
would love to see how this stacks vs the front facing lidar on the iPhones (true depth). Dope video!
I only have the regular iPhone 13, any particular app you recommend I use?
what pc specs you need? Thanks
so no one has had luck with the scanning of faces/people or pets? I am in the market for one- but every review I watch says these budget ones arent great for that?
Bitte bei Werbevideos keine Werbung schalten. :)
Why does the live view of the scanned object look pretty good but the final output is so messy?
The live view is just sparse data, it often looks very blurry but helps you see what’s been covered. Since it’s 3D-data, the filtration of the raw data can then transform it to much more detailed (but also sometimes noisier) data.
Sie verwechseln da wahrscheinlich etwas; das "live view" besteht überwiegend aus einem Bild, nicht aus "3D-Daten".
Do not buy this scanner, the information provided by the manufacturer to register can no longer be executed, there are no drivers for this scanner because it is discontinued. It is a scam that they do not provide support
would you recomend the AD5MP or the AD5M more
If you just print PLA and want to save money, the adv5 is superb! But the 5M pro isn’t much more expensive and a great option!
ZBrush is the best for cleaning scans and making nice edge loops using Retypologiese.
$7000US…. 😢 I’ve been eying out the Einstar for a good year… I’m hoping there’s a jump in 3d scanning tech, so prices of the old kit comes down. It’s got too be close now. 🤨
Yeah there is still a gap between what Einstar and the others (Revopoint / 3Dmakerpro) can offer and what EinScan Pro, Artec EVA etc. offers at a higher price rate. I would love to see Shining3D release something around $2-4000 that is similar to their Pro 2X. It would make a dent in the market.
Please update the title to be less misleading, this is the moose lite, not the full moose.
How do they compare with iPhone LiDAR ?
What app for this?
iPhone lidar is made for room scanning, the distance resolution is just… too low for this kind of application
iPhone lidar has mm accuracy. You can’t compare it to a 3d scanner.
Thanks for replies : )
Very good info. Could you give alternative product in the 1000usd price range? For 10cm-1000cm objects or similar. Thank you.
You know I haven’t tried the bigger scanners from 3Dmakerpro and revopoint yet, so I’m unsure exactly which one is “best”. But I recommend checking out the lynx I linked in description.
This machine is amazing with Orca Slicer 2 beta, full printing control. Believe me, avoid Flash Print
How is it conpare to mole?
Basically the same, but I find accuracy a bit better on the Moose!
I have the Mole and it's f'n useless for anything where you actually want dimensional accuracy... so if it's like that then just forget it.m unless you just want to scan garden gnomes. It causes me such pain!
@tomhanauer6919 well I’ve only been able to test accuracy on my known sized objects, and the moose is much better than the mole, but it’s probably a ton up to the user as well. But for dimensional accuracy with tight tolerances these scanners are not designed for.
@3DPrintTechDesign Yep I totally get that user input is important. I have spent weeks, in communication with 3Dmakepro trying to scan an empty Nissan Leaf engine bay. It is matt painted metal. I have used masking tape, with writing etc. It makes no difference. The scanner picks up amazing detail, capturing dirt, cobwebs, weld imperfections. But it can't track. So as I track along a chassis member with multiple fixing holes it will scan seemingly perfectly, then I raise up to get the top of the rail and I return, and there we see that somehow when I get back to the start, nothing lines up. When I go into the scan data I can see frames where it just jumps half an inch, with perfectly useful features on screen, it doesn't care, it just duplicates the feature. Then when adding scans together you end up with something, that if it's a sculpture it probably looks fine, but if you actually need the holes to be where they are supposed to be, is, as mentioned, totally useless. As an indicator of where we're at, 3dmaker told me not to return the scanner over already scanned areas... well shit it's almost as if they know it doesn't work.