The Austin School is part of Sekhmet Liminal, LLC. It is dedicated to digging into the truth, weeding out the misinformation, and understanding the world as it really is. Our goal is to have a variety of talks and panels on as many issues as we can cover. We do not censor and therefore do not always agree with our speakers.The opinions expressed here are not necessarily the opinions of The Austin School, Sekhmet Liminal, LLC, or its members. Also we are humans and as a result deeply flawed. Please accept in advance your apologies for all our errors.
Пікірлер
One of the main reasons why the Middle East in the shape it is now is because the Kurds have been neglected by Arabs, Turks and Persians. If the Kurds were treated as equals in the Middle East, we would have Lions like Sherko and Saladin hailing from the Kurdish regions. Instead these hero’s are now busy fighting the injustices of states like Iran, Turkey Syria and Iraq for justice and peace of the Kurdish freedom.
Little Gutless Coward "General"🤣
For correction, Omar Ibnulkhatab & Khalaid Ibnul Waleed were not first cousins.
this guy is a complete fraud. The amount of lies in the first 15 minutes is astonishing. For starters the Egyptians never circumnavigated Africa with multiple sources negating the only possible claim from Herodotus. No wonder he teaches at Austin community college.
AZTECS ATE PEOPLE. ORANISED CANABALISM. History.
WOKE, DEI, CRT, ESG MIND VIRUS HISTORY.
loved this professor
@52:00 Dr casagranda actually did an uncharacteristical mistake when explaining about the unification of Italy. Saying that it was the Sardinian army that did it it’s like saying that Elvis Presley won WW2. Yes he was in the army, but he surely didn’t do shit. It was piedmont’s royal family that lead the Piemonte and Sardinia kingdom, but Sardinia was more like the seaside summer place for them, and population on the island was very little so the impact on the war was minimal
I love how the Dr is dropping little dimes..tyrna wake people up about the world w rhetoric and sarcasm throughout his speech
i have read but the things told by Dr Roy are amazing and that's why Muslims rule the world.
I love his story telling. But he leaves a lot out. The Aztecs did indeed fight wars with weapons and killed on the battlefield. I think what he was referring to is a “Flower War”, which was a ritualistic battle agreed to beforehand by both sides.
Who are the two other greatest warrior of all time?
Revisionist history. It’s insane people actually listen to this guy and take him seriously. Islamists were almost always the aggressors into Christian lands. Spain, Italy, France, Austria, Poland, THE BALKANS. And they weren’t benevolent. They enslaved, r*ped, stole, murdered, forced conversions, ect. Meanwhile Christian’s allowed you to openly practice Islam in the Holy Sea if you paid a religious tax. Most and I mean an overwhelming majority of Christian Crusades were defensive or reconquest of taken land from Jihads, or to stop Islamic expansion. That is a historical fact.
If history came to Earth as a man.
One hour in, and it's clear that this guy clearly is absolutely clueless about the history of South Africa, within the context of the time. The government housing he speaks about at approximately 01h00, was built to accommodate the labour force that was urbanising, from rural areas and MUD huts. The government couldn't stay ahead. When the ANC communists they rebranded the program, called it RDP housing and are still continuing to build those same house 30 years later. I wouldn't pay to get ANY classes from this CRT woke fool.
The US Democratic Party is centre right, he says, and the Republican Party is extreme right. Oh, give us a break! 😂 The Democratic (Socialist) Party is about one step away from being full-blown communists! 😂 He's view about politics explains a lot about his apologetic white guilt way of retelling facts, instead of a neutral rendition of the truth.
I'm not too sure this Dr. has all his facts straight about South Africa. As for slavery, the Dutch East India Company ordered Jan van Riebeeck NOT to enslave the locals, but to bring in slaves from Indonesia. The Great Trek did not start due to the end of slavery, as most of the Boers didn't own slaves. The Great Trek started because the Brits wanted to abolish Dutch from all daily life, from government to schools. As for racially based laws. They weren't instituted under Afrikaners rule, but under British rule in the Union of South Africa, the 1913 Land Act being the starting point. The British governed the Union for 38 years until 1948, when the Afrikaners took control. The laws that followed were in response to the horrific events surrounding the Bolsheviks, Stalin, and the spread of communism from the 1950s onwards. The continued race based tales told about South Africa obscures the truth. kzread.info/dash/bejne/iIqLypJqqabVebQ.html
Apartheid was ultimately a response to the horrors of the Bolsheviks after The Great War, Stalin after World War Two, and the effects of the USSR communist "Winds of Change" that swept across Africa after the breakup of the various Empires. Apartheid was not nearly what it was it was made out to be by the Western media at the time, and now after. Especially the exceedingly ignorant comparison to the State of Israel these days.
wow...love the honesty no lies deception
The general of the Roman empire: I come with 200,000 men. Khalid ibn Waleed I come with an army of 5,000 men who love death more than life.
it's called Persian Gulf, not Arabian Gulf. He says he doesn't want to take sides but he keeps saying Arabian Gulf. If he wants to be a historian, he has to learn to study the history of the region.
I LOVEEEEEEEEEEE YOUUUUUUUUU DR. ROY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Can someone give me a synthesis of his main arguments to see if it's worth listening to him for almost two hours?
As a Spaniard from the Canaries, listening to Casagranda's lectures is refreshing and highly interesting. I wish he can turn his eyes on the Conquest of the Canaries one day, I am sure he'd find it very enlightening.
The Dude’s actually professional is teaching in uni ? ❤❤
Hey you probably forgot to mention battle of badar before battle of ohad ,where arab muslim defeated their opponent,or was it deliberate ?
children crusade was real? im so confused
Jaja men! history is brutal, killed a sibling in oreder to live or learn how to farm, ( dont quote me on that, its wrong, but somthing along the lines) funny but true. Like the passion and aegerness of this person teaching history its a trip. If tv was not invented this guy would be it.
Regarding the economy, Iran is now part of the BRICS organization, plus the fact that Iran has achieved complete self-sufficiency and independence from Western dominance.
Dr. Casagranda is misinformed about how Mahsa Amini died and is perpetuating Western propaganda. She died of natural causes, that's the result of the autopsy report!
To the Iranians: This guy is not your friend, he is providing many accurate facts and 95 percent of what he says is true, But his main objective is to slide in a few, but VERY IMPORTANT untrue "facts" to influence and derail Iran and Iranians future, in favour of his own political agenda. He casually normalises the fake name for the Persian Gulf, calling it Arabian, and then lies about the Shah saying he was cruel, and then fakes a hero out of Mossadegh claiming he was a warrior for democracy and that the Shah was a puppet of the US. All of these things are critical to how Iranians and others see Iranian recent history and determines how they proceed. One of the biggest signs instantly recognisable is his oversimplification of everything.
How come so many people follow a Dummy like diaper Don?
During the protests that took place following Ahmadinejad's reelection, I distinctly remember going back and reading in detail about the Iranian Revolution to figure out if it would succeed. The main things I took away from this: 1.) There was a weak and unpopular government, 2.) Unemployment was through the roof, and 3.) Iran's clerics played a major role in organizing it. I didn't think the protests would succeed, because, obviously, conditions 2 and 3 weren't satisfied, but, just as importantly, condition 1 wasn't really satisfied because you had the generation that made the Iranian Revolution in power, which learned its lessons from that experience and wasn't likely to weaken in the face of the protests. Sure enough, the protests were crushed, and, except in Iran, they were mostly forgotten. Fast forward to the most recent uprising, and, yes, the protesters had learned some lessons, too, and had brought about a completely unique movement. The problem typically, however, isn't so much getting people angry and making some protests happen, but it's keeping them going until the regime capitulates. The Iran Revolution succeeded because you had a lot of idle bodies who could devote their time to the protests, and you had a network of clerics to organize them: Was there anything comparable in the most recent movement? The strikes, perhaps, lent themselves to more people being available to occupy public spaces, but did the most recent protest movement find some other networking force, in the absence of the clerics, to truly organize itself? Social media/the internet? I was doubtful at the time these protests would succeed-- because, as a rule, most regimes are not topped by popular uprisings-- but I'm honestly very curious why they failed. Were the conditions all there for it to succeed and the execution was flawed, or were there more fundamental problems with the movement?
What I have never understood, just because you found the first surviving writings from the Mesopotamians, how do you come to say that this is the beginning of writing? Yes, I know science has to stick to evidence. But let's assume that civilization were suddenly lost and that research into the beginning of writing would only be carried out again in 10,000 years. Wouldn't one assume that our age was one in which humanity completely lost the ability to write. Because the paper on which we printed the letters and even the plastic letters will probably have rotted, decomposed and not be found again by then? What I want to say: Isn't it very likely that writing on materials on which writing has been preserved for several thousand years began much later? Later than writing on materials that produced rather fleeting “documents” lasting only a few days, weeks, years or decades? What was so important to hunters and gatherers that they wanted to preserve it for centuries or millennia? This will can even be denied to the Mesopotamians. As far as I know, most of the "documents" we find from this time are labels on vessels and lists of larger trade transactions. Afterwards, no one needed them anymore. But since they were written on clay, they "coincidentally" survived for a few thousand years.
I hear this guy has a PhD in stupidity and boredom
Roy sounds better XD
انسحب من معركة مؤتة. قتل مالك بن نويرة غدرا واغتصب زوجة مالك. من المهاجمين على بنت النبي فاطمة الزهراء. حاول قتل علي بن أبي طالب أثناء الصلاة بأمر من أبي بكر. تبرأ النبي من فعله في بعض الغزوات لتعديه على القبيلة قتلا، وقال النبي : اللهم إني أبرء إليك مما فعل خالد، ثم قد تعويضات مع علي بن أبي طالب لتلك القبيلة وليرضيهم. كان خالد محسوبا على حزب أبي بكر. عمر متهم في قتل خالد، لا سيما بعد دعاء عمر الحاكم الأرضي الثاني على خالد في فترة قصيرة.
i literally cant stop listening
As a Southtown Vietnamese I appreciate Nixon so much…. He was on the side of the south Vietnamese n clearly this punk asss professsor did not support south Vietnam…his anti Nixon rants clearly he didn’t want the south Vietnamese to fight n the country became communist….
I like the history, I don’t like the current world views he’s indoctrinating in young people.
I bet he's still wearing that mask.
Just compare how the Crusaders conquered Jerusalem and how the early Muslims (with Khalid) conquered it.
This guy is so ignorant on the topic of Islam. They were tolerant to other religions? Tell that to an non Muslim Indian. They literally converted by the sword. Blaming the partition of Pakistan/India on the British is also a huge display of his ignorance.
This man is so biased yet comes across as knowledgeable. The USA democrat party is very left wing. Don't let this man lie to you. The Republican party is not far right as he claims but right of centre. His obvious bias shows in this one statement which dilutes all his other accounts in this lecture. If he was neutral then his credibility would be better.
Aztec empire had a popular of 4-6 million, not 35 million as this guy claimed.
The perfect professor for our fact-free mental diet.
I think WW3 will be mostly drone attacks on civilian populations until one side surrenders
Crusaders from French and Germany?
Didn’t Khaled Ibn Walid killed Malek Ibn Nuira, boiled his head, and had sex with his wife?
bro the burning and banning of knowledge is just like in one peice with the buster call on Ohara