Пікірлер

• 
  @russchadwell4 минут бұрын

  And, nice to skydive from with bundles of cash...

• 
  @TinLeadHammer19 минут бұрын

  No mention of TU-154?

• 
  @briandagnall18433 сағат бұрын

  it's only ignition and throttle preferable to waiting 7 months for RR parts.

• 
  @thailandrose26033 сағат бұрын

  Which Airlines Operate All 3 Models Of The Boeing 787 Dreamliner - Who cares. Never fly on a 787 Nightmare Liner, the most dangerous aircraft in the sky,

• 
  @Xpyburnt_ndz3 сағат бұрын

  Loved flying the 727...a little bit cramped seating wise but a nice smooth flying airliner! Flew AA Oakland, CA to Baltimore, MD

• 
  @tylerdurden40064 сағат бұрын

  Weird, if you talk to boeing supporters who don't think boeings having problems all the time isn't really boeing having problems and they don't have choices in the engines they put on their planes and it's not their fault the engines blow up all the time. 🤦‍♂️🤣

• 
  @garrytownsend63545 сағат бұрын

  I regard the B727 as the most beautiful aeroplane ever designed and built. As a teenager, I saw the 727 more like a rocket ship than an aeroplane. I was only able to fly on one twice - on Ansett-ANA's VH-RME from Mt Isa to Brisbane and from Brisbane to Sydney. It was under the command of veteran pilot Captain Arthur Lovell in 1968. A very memorable occasion that I will never forget.

• 
  @kallsop26 сағат бұрын

  Between 1973 and 1988 I flew several times on the 727 with American, Braniff, Continental and United. I was 10 the first time in 1973. The thing I liked about it was they were fairly quiet with the the engines in the tail and they were also quite comfortable bit some of that, I think, was the seats were bigger back then and the configuration also had good leg room as well.

• 
  @iampianoman8 сағат бұрын

  I recall flying on the B727 with Air Canada in the 1980's between Ottawa and Edmonton, it was one of the last aircraft I flew where the flight deck accommodated three active staff rather than two.

• 
  @MICPG98 сағат бұрын

  National Eastern Northwest Northeast Northeastern Hughes AirWest American United Braniff Southwest PSA Delta Alaska Wien Air Alaska Western

• 
  @izil1fe10 сағат бұрын

  There is literally no comparasion. I would pay MORE to NOT fly in that death trap. If it's Boeing, i am 100% not going. Not now, not ever.

• 
  @ebarteldes11 сағат бұрын

  I flew on that plane many times on Trans-Brasil and VASP. Not sure if Varig had it. I flew it on the São Paulo-Fortaleza route and back.

• 
  @El_Locoroco13 сағат бұрын

  Im on Team I don't want to die

• 
  @send2gl17 сағат бұрын

  7 Tons, that is amazing.

• 
  @prokastinatore17 сағат бұрын

  It's a crime not to built the queen of the skies anymore. Worldwide there are so many passengers who would love being carried with the Boeing 747. Those very few airlines who have got this type are always booked.

• 
  @breathtakingblue18 сағат бұрын

  Aircraft should always have the optio of two engines. Look at the mess with the PW GTF and imagine if that was the sole engine available on the A320. Egyptair have or are selling their entire fleer of the Air us A220 due to reliability issues with the engine.

• 
  @petervogel801519 сағат бұрын

  Lbf is pound feet

• 
  @TheBattleMaster10020 сағат бұрын

  Bahamasair had two 727-200 series in the late 1980s. They were eventually phased out in my country in favor of the 737 and the Dash 8-200. I flew on a 727-200 with my dad in the late 1990s with a loaner aircraft working for Bahamasair. It was a rugged and solid built aircraft.

• 
  @rafaelwilks21 сағат бұрын

  GE >>> RR

• 
  @DSAK5522 сағат бұрын

  favorite aircraft of hijackers

• 
  @John-nc4blКүн бұрын

  The only reason that RR were able to sell so many engines in the past was because of their unethical business practices. Google and you will fing lots of information about the huge fines that hit them.

• 
  @artrandyСағат бұрын

  GE just never got caught, you nasty shill..........

• 
  @GeeBoggsКүн бұрын

  Fascinating! Nicely produced and edited. I was unaware all A350's were equipped with the RR Trent.

• 
  @John-nc4blКүн бұрын

  GE engines will be available for the A350 in the future.

• 
  @artrandyСағат бұрын

  @@John-nc4bl But by then Airbus wont need them. RR has an exclusive until 2030, and before then the XWB engine upgrades are due, and by the end of the decade the RR UltraFan will have diverted new technology to hopefully Neo the programme. Its only American carriers who need American engines, for home politics, the rest of the world celebrate free trade and are more than happy with their extra quiet and extra economical RR Trent XWBs. The A350 order books are already stretched, so Airbus doesn't have to rock the boat with RR, nor feel the need to spend millions of dollars to help GE to make the programme a success. Its already a great success, and unlike the B787, a money spinner since 2019. GE can whistle all they like, they rejected powering the A350-1000 in the first place, and now Airbus can just ignore them, politely of course....😀😀....

• 
  @TrentonThomas627Күн бұрын

  Kalitta air still flies them I believe

• 
  @none941Күн бұрын

  I'm a fan of Pratt & Whitney.

• 
  @29ar3d1019 сағат бұрын

  A geared turbofan?

• 
  @EuropeanRailfanAlt15 сағат бұрын

  That has issues in hot weather?

• 
  @TherizzaAlvarezКүн бұрын

  Boy you trying to make me scared for my flight in 5 days?!

• 
  @okay_then3337Күн бұрын

  Airlines are getting fed up with with poor quality in the industry and are making their voices heard with their money. In this case many are flocking to the reliable GE option. Likewise many airlines are flocking to the CFM (GE) option for the a320 over Pratt& Whitney’s problematic GTF engines. On a larger scale, more airlines are choosing the a320 family over the 737 Max due to the constant issues with the latter. Rolls Royce is lucky they have are the exclusive engine for the a350 or they would be in real trouble. Also Boeing and Pratt& Whitney are lucky that Airbus and CFM can’t produce more of their respective products fast enough.

• 
  @artrandyСағат бұрын

  The A350 is the success it is, because of the combination of airframe and engines, so why would customers wish to invest in the potential powdered metal problems with the GENX, which the FAA fear will soon affect Boeing aircraft......

• 
  @msgproductions3515Күн бұрын

  Don't forget the Soviet Union's knockoff of the 727 (the Tupolev TU-154).

• 
  @wotan10950Күн бұрын

  And here is an example flying westbound on a North Atlantic track while two flights were on the track south of our track. kzread.info/dash/bejne/hZl3lrSSidXbcrA.htmlsi=2h2XEspNn4Fj_lty

• 
  @Will777XКүн бұрын

  I flew in a 727 from Miami to San Juan in 1986, and with Delta I flew on several 727s between 2000-2001. Great experience with all of them!

• 
  @aeromtb2468Күн бұрын

  why no P&W

• 
  @Petriefied0246Күн бұрын

  What I'd like to see is a Beluga repurposed as a "sky yacht". Imagine a full glass front door and full height atrium.

• 
  @eamonahern7495Күн бұрын

  I was aware that the type operated with both engines because of being a regular viewer of Simple Flying and Long Haul. You can kind of pick up on these things even if the information isn't always a direct feature of the content. I suspect BA chose Rolls Royce because it's a British brand.

• 
  @khakiswagКүн бұрын

  GE is proving to be the Toyota of turbofans when it comes to reliability and dependability.

• 
  @artrandyСағат бұрын

  Unless of course the powdered metal problem catches up with the company..........

• 
  @Ayden2008Күн бұрын

  I just love the 787 in general

• 
  @omerbinsaadat4973Күн бұрын

  Favourite: GE -90 B Gold Standard in aircraft engine. Absolutely super performance.

• 
  @sfshah8870Күн бұрын

  A350

• 
  @stevenholt1867Күн бұрын

  I would like my own private Airbus A330neo.

• 
  @stevenholt1867Күн бұрын

  I reckon the last remaining Airbus A340 could be Qatar Amiri.

• 
  @rscott2247Күн бұрын

  I suppose there are pros & cons of jetliner makers to offer only one engine brand. However the 787 good firm order book could be because of having the choice option for airlines ?

• 
  @tornadoxtКүн бұрын

  Which engine is more efficient.........GE9x or Trent 1000???.GE seems to be the bigger engine manufacturer.

• 
  @stevenholt1867Күн бұрын

  No Pratt & Whitney. Also TUI opted for GEnx.

• 
  @jclements7361Күн бұрын

  A 727 was the first type of plane I ever flew on, an Eastern Airlines flight from Miami to Tampa. Also, flew several times on Eastern L-1011s, the longest of those trips was from Seattle to Atlanta Those were the best, in my opinion. Huge, comfortable and smooth.

• 
  @harstoftКүн бұрын

  RR messed up with the Trent 1000. Airlines love the Trent XWB-84. The XWB-97 will show its pedigree soon

• 
  @jordanalexander4331Күн бұрын

  I would go for RR given their availability.

• 
  @John-nc4blКүн бұрын

  GE are the best engines. RR overpromise performance and fail to deliver that promise.

• 
  @eastpeak7420 сағат бұрын

  We ( Air NZ, I’m a kiwi) have 14 787’s with RR engines. 3 are grounded as RR have no availability of spares OR engines. So bring on the GE models.

• 
  @jet328i2Күн бұрын

  My father flew the 727 for Eastern his entire career until he retired in 1989.

• 
  @captbart3185Күн бұрын

  The -727 was the result of airlines needing to meet the flight rules at the time. You could not operate over water or some mountainous areas unless you were within an hour of a suitable field. The tri-jets fixed that problem with one fewer engine. Current rules allow 2hours due to incredibly improved engine quality. Rules are called ETOPS for Extended Twin Operations, IIRC, but many pilots of my time called it ‘Engines Turn Or Passengers Swim’ but NEVER where we could be over heard. Not similar reasons for L1011 and DC-10/11. Jumbo jets but one less engine than a -747.

• 
  @Uranium-238-EaterКүн бұрын

  Question 1: Which engine option did Emirates go for? Question 2: Is Rolls Royce really that bad. Didn't they fix the issues they had with the engines during Covid?

• 
  @John-nc4blКүн бұрын

  RR still not fixed.

• 
  @eastpeak7420 сағат бұрын

  In answer to your 2nd question. No, far from it. We ( Air NZ, I’m a kiwi ) have 14 787’s. All RR powered as we don’t have the -10’s yet. 3 are grounded as RR cannot supply either parts or replacement engines. So sadly no, nowhere near fixed.

• 
  @Uranium-238-Eater19 сағат бұрын

  @@eastpeak74 Cries in the downfall of British industry.

• 
  @peterj.cressman165Күн бұрын

  Another idiotic post from the simpletons of simple flying.

• 
  @Sole-tx9cxКүн бұрын

  I used to fly them since I was a young kid from JFK to Tampa or Orlando!

• 
  @Tpr_1808Күн бұрын

  A330, 767 and 747-400 are where it's at where they had 3 options