Пікірлер

• 
  @dnddrawings55016 сағат бұрын

  43:02

• 
  @antoinepetrov7 күн бұрын

  20:57 - 23:08 Slavoj Žižek on Shit

• 
  @hyperborean257613 күн бұрын

  Anarchism is impossible on a large scale for the simple fact that anyone who would disagree with the lack of authority would want to create authority, in order to have a homogenous anarchist society that society would have to be tyrannical and force it into people, which creates this oxymoron. Anarchism is only possible on smaller scales and/or short periods of time, usually through a transition period within a revolution. But we live in a society were you are free to do was you wish, so any Anarchists need not abide to the rules of society, they can go live in a desert or forest with fellow Anarchists.

• 
  @havenbastion21 күн бұрын

  Everything anarchism aims at is impossible at scale.

• 
  @Will_Moffett21 күн бұрын

  Would anyone like Graeber be allowed on mainstream television today? Not that there is anyone like David Graeber. RIP

• 
  @FG-fc1yz23 күн бұрын

  ab55:30 zur Nachhaltigkeit 1:01:50 MA / DR: UNKNOWN KNOWS 1:03:00 unknown knows materializes itself i.e. in architecture (social structure) 1:04:20!!! man kennt die positiven Inhalte der Ideologie bewusst selbst (man weiß bewusst davon), aber man braucht noch die FORM der Kunst (hier: Architektur), um Ideologie möglichst vollständig erfassen zu können

• 
  @mantwat16Ай бұрын

  Zizek uses "changing the the subject" as an art form

• 
  @zoren4042 ай бұрын

  Brilliant distinction between activism and direct action.

• 
  @Goofy89072 ай бұрын

  3:12 "I'm interested in anthropology because I'm interested in human possibilities" - David Graebar YES!

• 
  @Jimi_Lee2 ай бұрын

  I miss David.

• 
  @alecfraher71223 ай бұрын

  less and more, eh! the reality (un)principle of minima morelia, or what ~ either/or > or what? .... betterthan, materially and economically speaking requires an Or What, no? How else does indeterminacy and the drive for economic extreme commensurability avoid aesthetics ~ the wrapping paper of life, as a misre-present-nation of, Of-ness of Having-Being?

• 
  @gregoryfrancis38993 ай бұрын

  Talk show hosts are so deep in the indoctrination Control System that they're totally unaware of their myopia, and this renders them imbecilic in the company of enlightened souls like David.

• 
  @user-gj7vp6wk3e4 ай бұрын

  ME AND A CERTAIN ULTIMATE FIGHTER ARE ANARCHISTS TOO. SO, GOOD JOB.🙂

• 
  @JLeeRiddell4 ай бұрын

  Taken too young. I would have loved hear his perspective on the last 3 years.

• 
  @tnndll42944 ай бұрын

  It's easy to be an anarchist when you have law and order in society. try living in a high crme neighborhood.

• 
  @realbland4 ай бұрын

  what do you think causes crime?

• 
  @anonymoose4784 ай бұрын

  @@realbland poverty

• 
  @brajat553823 күн бұрын

  Wrong, anarchism would improve the situation...in the long term

• 
  @brajat553823 күн бұрын

  People will be debt free and people won't have to do bullshit jobs

• 
  @user-lj9hv3zz9u4 ай бұрын

  Such a legend of the future if there is one after America’s decline 😂

• 
  @midnightwatchman14 ай бұрын

  sounds like rubbish, give an example of an anarchist working " When it is working no one sees it" LOL . if you work and live in an area where no one else has any interest then it may work. you do not have anything useful to anybody

• 
  @brajat553823 күн бұрын

  What is anything useful for you?

• 
  @harryd58935 ай бұрын

  Is Corporation a bureaucracy? Orders are given, handed down from top to the bottom. As Chomsky says Corporation is a Command Economy

• 
  @funkrobert995 ай бұрын

  “Any brief questions” nope! 😂

• 
  @nohisocitutampoc27896 ай бұрын

  We miss you David.

• 
  @jmgresham936 ай бұрын

  The general public is powerless to principles believed in by the alienated. The general critique of Slavoj Žižek's ideas: if such a thing ever occurs as a possible direction or development certain principles of the dominant conception will be regarded as facts of nature, but certain knowledge will be argued as being determinately impossible. This makes them unable to rationalize solutions to problems that they have created themselves like the global economic network that follows in contribution increasingly the direction of climate sensitivity with a perpendicular direction that is the rate of change of globalization.

• 
  @jmgresham936 ай бұрын

  The general public is powerless to principles believed in by the alienated. The general critique of his ideas: if such a thing ever occurs as a possible direction or development; regards certain principles of the dominant conception as facts of nature, but argues that certain knowledge is impossible. This makes them unable to rationalize solutions to problems that they have created themselves like the global economic network that contributes increasingly to climate sensitivity because of the rate of change of globalization.

• 
  @dbass49737 ай бұрын

  why do we need representative democracies now when we've got the internet? would not the communities be able to decide for themselves what is best for them? or will that voting system be hacked right away?

• 
  @ML-vm8we7 ай бұрын

  Can Charlie just stfu and stop interrupting my god

• 
  @davelind88548 ай бұрын

  HOW STUPID IS CHARLIE ROSE ?

• 
  @martinwilliams98668 ай бұрын

  Anarchism means you can't tell people what Anarchism means!

• 
  @martinwilliams98668 ай бұрын

  I don't think there are any rules that Anarchists have to indulge in direct action!

• 
  @sashatulips46318 ай бұрын

  I never tire of listening to this brilliant man. What a loss. RIP

• 
  @citrusmaximus31118 ай бұрын

  The part about the toilet at the ZKM is not correct: Instead of a prerecordet tape, the camera is constantly filming but just a miniature replica of the actual toilets. The miniature is also located there. Just incase anyone was wondering... after 11 years :D

• 
  @riccardopoletti36948 ай бұрын

  Amazing amazing thinker. Wow. Thank you Zizek

• 
  @randallsmith56319 ай бұрын

  Yale Profs didn't get their keyster's kissed. That's why they kicked David out of Yale.

• 
  @EliW959 ай бұрын

  Wow this guy was pushing against the WEF long before the entity entered the public consciousness

• 
  @ryanburdeaux9 ай бұрын

  Interesting that he critiques Frank Lloyd Wright. He’s punching up

• 
  @Cd5ssmffan9 ай бұрын

  Anarchism: from the dictatorship of the specialists, back to imperialism. Various "leftists" focus all their efforts on "social issues" and the bourgeois concept of "hierarchies" and "equality" while throwing the productive forces to the wolves. They appeal not to working class people, but to ideals, perfectly content if said ideals are ultimately manifested by empowering the left flank of imperialism. There is a reason that anarchists are concentrated in the imperial core and inevitably side with the corresponding liberal regimes. They, like the imperialist liberals are zionists, cosmopolitans and parasites. For all their claims concerning "no rules, no masters", it cannot even be expected that they will stand against imperialism or demand industrialization and the right to employment. As in the case of liberal imperialists, the presence of actual human rights like employment and abundance mean absolutely nothing in the absence of bourgeois privilege and they are more than happy to take it in blood. Anarchism is nothing but a bourgoise hobby.

• 
  @foodchewer8 ай бұрын

  "There is a reason that anarchists are concentrated in the imperial core..." was Ukraine in the early 20th century the imperial core? What about Spain in the 1930s? What about Chiapas, Mexico since the 90s? Were those the imperial core? Oh and don't forget Rojava, right now.

• 
  @brajat553823 күн бұрын

  What does even being productive mean? 🤔

• 
  @raulboggio534710 ай бұрын

  Much Ado about nothing. All existence requires the presence of mater and energy. If there is a God, it has neither. That is the definition of spirit. The question then is, how can something that cost no matter or energy create anything?

• 
  @theccs501210 ай бұрын

  kzread.infoUgkxC8bZurIhMoEK33QKGijOTV4O81wbIJvR

• 
  @Sol6645910 ай бұрын

  How lovely is it to watch an interview done with genuine curiosity, with goodwill from both.

• 
  @ktm125pete10 ай бұрын

  Anarchy is where people are moral and do not use violence against others

• 
  @clarasophie29810 ай бұрын

  Hello, would you be okay with me showing parts of this clip at a congress in Germany?

• 
  @davedismantled10 ай бұрын

  He's pretty good, but not quite all the way to True Anarchy. No discussion of Natural Law, the NAP or the SDP. No discussion of authority as an illegitimate concept, as it relates to one person or group of people commanding another person or group of people. Real Anarchy is not on the political spectrum, it transcends the illusion of politics.

• 
  @carpballet11 ай бұрын

  All of that unrest paid off. Finally, peace in the Middle East. Praise god and allah.

• 
  @murrieta496 ай бұрын

  😮

• 
  @rckli11 ай бұрын

  People talk of him in such a way that leaves me wondering where the man they’re talking about is 😅 I think they’re more entranced by his accent than what he says

• 
  @NacrunoCreations6 ай бұрын

  You're commenting this under a video where he talked about the mute language of buildings and the unique power of the arts to articulate that which can not be articulated; to make the point to the architects in the room that they are a key part of the revolutionary struggle? My man, did you even listen to this?

• 
  @rckli6 ай бұрын

  @@NacrunoCreations ugh - it’s people like you that are the problem, ignoring what they read to instead go full “cult of personality” for the guy 😅 a major problem with people like you is you don’t even make the slightest effort to make it look like you even read what you’re responding to Tell me, latest 🤡, what did I write in the original message?

• 
  @adep1544 Жыл бұрын

  I have never heard Paxman say "that's great" at the end of any other interview he's done in his long career.

• 
  @fullercrowley Жыл бұрын

  Thanks for this discussion. I hadn't heard of Graeber and regret that I missed him while he was alive. I appreciate this introduction.

• 
  @davidkroemer1470 Жыл бұрын

  This guy sounds more like a commie than an anarchist.

• 
  @lezdraven623010 ай бұрын

  Anarchists are communists

• 
  @brajat553823 күн бұрын

  Do you believe capitalsts produce anything without other humans labour ? 😅

• 
  @user-gw9kq7qm2k Жыл бұрын

  Interesting interview

• 
  @dimisahn Жыл бұрын

  It's all about feels for the douch.

• 
  @claudiamanta1943 Жыл бұрын

  Oh, dear 😂 *roars* ‘I’m an anarchist and… and… I fight for a better world… and all that’. *purrs whilst sniffing the cash* ‘It’s not nice to criticise other people in academia; there’s a hierarchy’. Absolutely priceless 😂 Anarchy is as stupid as democracy or totalitarianism. It’s just controlled opposition, the intended reaction to change a system. People need healthy institutions and hierarchies of power and authority, as well as sane and moral leaders. For people to be able to genuinely self- govern, three conditions must be fulfilled: 1. People must be able and willing to think. 2. People must have the correct and complete information about relevant matters. 3. People must be willing to induce and sustain positive change, preferably because of internalised strong moral values that can drive them into action. None of the above applies. Not surprising, given how effectively those with real power have pulled the strings to disable and control the mobs with their f*cking ideologies that include dialectics and social utilitarianism topped-up with a varnish of so- called spirituality (mainly religion) which embeds and cultivates stupidity, cowardice, and irreverence to all that is Divine in a human being. Oh, many would say with indignation, how can you be so cynical? And I would answer- Look. No, no. I mean literally look at the world. If you are able to know what’s best for you and your community and you want to change things, then why is this world such a terrible shit place, eh? I’m very realistic- pessimistic. The criminally incompetent evil will forever rule the stupid and the coward.

• 
  @jessew7565 Жыл бұрын

  I'm not going to call you cynical, I'm going to call you profoundly ignorant. You seem awfully confident for a person who has literally never looked at the vast span of human history, which surprise surprise, provides a wealth of examples of anarchist societies, including large scale cities, not just small tribes. The basic default state of humanity is cooperative, relatively flat hierarchies. I really, really encourage you to read even the slightest bit about what humans have achieved in the past. You don't have to go that far back. "why is the world so shit!" The concentration of power under capitalist regimes whose fundamental driving ideology is the accumulation of profit over any other guiding principle, be it moral or otherwise, to the detriment of communal bonds. This has been asserted through the violence of the state. I also have to laugh at your shot at his character because this is a man who has stood on the front lines against the pigs and put his career in jeopardy for it. He walked the walk.

• 
  @farrider3339 Жыл бұрын

  "You put your finger there and I . . ." 😂 The future is near. Repent ! All u political correct dorks removing even the saltiness from salt, that is to say the rascality from human interactions. Philosophy of🚽🚽🚽 as always a REAL highlight 🏆 Sorry, I cannot develop dezz now ~

• 
  @33Donner77 Жыл бұрын

  When talk shows were worth listening to. I've been recently reading his books for the first time, may he RIP. My respect for him has also increased when he said he was kicked out of Yale University - and he did not present himself to be a victim.