Unravelling the mystery of our reality. Elucidated through the lens of Harry, a Human-AI synthesis from the 22nd century.
Humanity undergoes a radical turning point in the year 2064 - the singularity year. Those who still live in that year will be offered two choices. 1) They could either die naturally in the following years or 2) merge their existence with the grid. The latter would allow their knowledge, value and consciousness to be preserved forever in the vast network called Nex.
Harry, among one who opts for the second choice, exists virtually in the Nex grid for the following five decades. Until someday in 2123, he found a way to access the secret old database of information, aka the “2023 Internet” as we know it.
Team Beeyond Ideas:
Harry Dewang, MSc Aerospace Engineering
Firdan Ardhiyansyah, BSc Communication Science
Sam Mawardi, BEd Physics Education
Milk & Honey (VA team)
Пікірлер
Buddha told you that 2565 years ago.
Could motion be space-time expanding and contracting? Abstract The author William Stukeley of Memoirs of Sir Isaac Newton’s Life published in 1752 wrote “ .. After dinner, the weather being warm, we went into the garden and drank thea, under the shade of some apple trees…he told me, he was just in the same situation, as when formerly, the notion of gravitation came into his mind. It was occasion’d by the fall of an apple, as he sat in contemplative mood. Why should that apple always descend perpendicularly to the ground, thought he to himself…” Newton seeing this apple fall formulated gravity and went on to show that the movement of the moon and planets and other heavenly bodies is due to the same force. What if Newton had instead seen Galaxies moving due to an expanding universe, would he have then wondered if the apple falling, and all movement is due to an expanding universe? This short essay introduces a simple thought experiment to analyse this possibility. It concludes that’s if such is the case the passage of time and the expansion of the universe is one and the same. www.academia.edu/118362153/Could_motion_be_space
Interesting view of the universe...food for thought indeed
Please feel free to post your AI - produced drivel here. It doesn't have to be entertaining or even make sense. Thank you.
A big load of bullshit!
‘Eternal’ and ‘began’ hardly go together ! Use your mind. If God is eternal, God is beginningless. If God is beginningless, God had no choice in what He/It is. None whatsoever. So this Eternal Omnipotent Being is stuck with Itself forever, with no free will. That means the nature of this ‘omnipotence’ is fixed. For example, God can’t kill itself - or has never had the curiousity to try, because … here we all are. Nor can God end ‘evil’. God has had eternity to defeat Satan, and fails eternally. So unless your theology extends to Satan being part of God, it doesn’t stack up. You really haven’t thought this through have you ? ✌ 👽 🎸
People that have things installed in the brain is s way that screws the human soul up so it cannot be matched up with people's over soul
Someone tell me the movies names on here please?
I don't believe in limits, therefore I don't believe in the 'big bang' and I never will. The universe is far larger than we ever thought! I believe we were put into existence in order to save life! We will eventually crack faster than light travel, and I can't wait for that to happen!
"There is an Eternal GOD who Began All of This" ft. Roger Penrose I'd like to know where, exactly, did Roger Penrose give the above quote... or is this someone else trying to put words into his mouth? I strongly suspect the latter. 🤔 Edit: Oh... I see now... It wasn't actually Penrose who said this at all, but someone called Stephen C Meyer. But the way this quote is juxtaposed with Penrose's name in the title DOES apparently suggest that it was Penrose who said it... thus effectively putting those words into his mouth, which is ironic that in the video Penrose himself specifically rules out the notion of a 'god' behind it all. I must say this is one of the most dishonest, click-bait titles I've ever seen. Thumbs DOWN! 👎👎👎👎👎
Question: how does akashic record fit in this? Does it fall into one of this dimension?
Atheists just prove that God exists by talking about this
Does anyone know who was speaking in the clip at the TED talk? About "science delusion?" @ 11:41 Would love to watch the whole presentation!
No matter what you believe, there is still the ultimate paradox -- who created the creator? That, alone, should convince us that all questions of creative intelligence are utterly pointless. There is no reason to even ponder them.
There is a God.
Hmmm If there is a creative force/entity that is responsible for all of creation .... I wonder what created it. We are equal parts of unlikely and inevitable. Even the most unlikely string of conditions will inevitably happen if given an infinite amount of time, and when it does, all of the times when it failed to happen will mean nothing .... literally.
In the Summerian times they had many Gods then later someone came up with one God theory to erase the competition. Imagine if God has oly the humans to communicate it is the same if a humane would be send on the planet of the ants. What if the univers is full of spirits like in electricity plus and minus very complementary but in certain combinations it could be catastrophic for the humans.
Time cannot be eternal. Time has to have a starting point.this is known as the the "infinite regression fallacy".
The issue I have with a "grand designer" entity end-game is the assumption there's an all powerful all knowing force that's completely separate from everything else. Even the idea of a Superlative General Observer denotes a separation from everything else. Why can't it simply be that "God" is whatever the summation of everything is? Alpha Omega baby! Occam's Razor your minds folks. Think deep, but keep it simple.
Primitive rubbish!
Wow! Let play Let's pretend...!
Eh, you're misinterpreting Penrose's intention. He might have used the meme _"the Creator"_ as a saying fit in the moment, maybe as an irony to stress the absurdity of the current deficient degree of modelling the Universe. While you interpret it as Penrose believing in an Eternal GOD, he may have meant that the current state of understanding of the universe is so weak as to require the belief in a creator god in order to make sense of it. Then he goes on to clarify that god-factors don't have a place in theoretical physics.
There are probably super intelligent beings from worlds millions of light years away that are contemplating the same thing.🤔
I like this video its interestyng
I reject outright the sayings that go like: the things must have unfolded this way because the probability for unfolding alternative way would be so so small. Doesn’t matter as long as that prob is not zero. Hence you don’t need a creator, else who created that creator? Perhaps alternative way would be to realize that we are still way far from answering the ultimate question- the creation. Human mind can’t even solve little things, they already talk about the creation? Still the talk is based on presumption- meaning if something looks nicely structured, it must be created by an intelligent being. That’s nothing more than an everyday common sense analogy, which doesn’t work even for scientific principles like quantum physics, let alone the ultimate question for humans to answer.
there have been many begin at a time.
I am nothing, and i am everything.
I am not religious but but I am not an atheist either. I believe, there's a higher realm of consciousness, and there's something that created all this near and far. We call it god, because we just don't know. And for some strange reason, we will never know. I could go on and refer to countless personal experience, but I do belive, the universe have always been and always will be, with or without human beings.
Try to analyze the order in the whole cosmos. The Constellations in the heavens declare the glory of a great Cosmic Engineer! (Psalms 19:1) These are not the product of an unguided nature or mindless universe.
The CMB shows that our local part of the universe had a beginning. Yes. At least structurally. It proves there was a big bang. But it doesn't prove that there aren't other big bangs in progress right now all over the universe at large. If the universe is infinite, there are probably an infinite number of big bangs.
In few words” who knows”
LOL...every 'cosmological' theory just verifies and accentuates the BERSHEET (genesis) version of creation...there was nothing then there was something
Time and space aren't material and don't exist
Listen to me. The First Law of Thermodynamics states that the universe is eternal. No creator needed. No beginning and no end.
Do not waste time on smuggling in the concept of imaginary 'god'. Believers seize every possible chance to ruthlessly smuggle in the concept of intelligent design. thus god.
I have a new idea 🤓 ignore every single one of these so called eggheads and think how all this started for yourself 🙂 because they haven't a frigging clue how it started. 🤪.
God set the whole stage. Jesus was the word, and jesus was the universe in alpha. In life, he was the son of God and in omega after he rose again and will come again.
We would be god.
All scientific evidence points itself to intelligent creation of the universe. It is not random. Even it were random the universe is governed by certain laws and limitations that allow it to exist. Total randomness would not all anything to exist especially life like ours. Even the ability to question randomness is not randomness, but set up by intelligent creation.
@mitchevans4597, Not much evidence of "intelligence" anywhere these days so your "intelligent creation" must have forgotten "the plan"...looks more like the creator was from a lunatic asylum.
If it is man's destiny to colonize the universe, then it is god's destiny to eventually be found by man, fought, defeated, imprisoned, and exterminated. It is just a matter of time. God may not be eternal after all, because he created the wrong creature.
No there wasn't
So the Big Bang theory explains the whole of existence is expansion into “what?”.
I agree with this hypothesis.
olberrt ünsteyn
What is the piont then
I need a raise in my pay.
If a "creator" mechanism were to exponentially replicate itself ad infinitum, then it would likely eventually produce this universe with all the parts that made us possible. It could do this without what we call "intelligence." We would simply be a product of that mechanism.
Sounds like this video could scrape the tip of the iceberg, of what would it be like to be God. I'm content in our 4th dimensional existence, eating a cheeseburger with my child and cherishing the golden human moments.
From my point of view if I was on the Millers planet, the one hour would be one hour for me right? I mean I would spend a real hour of mine, I would be older one hour. And on Earth there would be 7 years older people right? So for me it does not matter where I spend that one hour.
In medieval times Penrose’s theory would be the equivalent of the Phoenix theory. Visuals can be found in the art of 14 th century Europe, ie pre renaissance cosmology and the rediscovery of Greek and Roman eras.