Yeah, that music definitely goes with Mike Pence. 😂
@superpaulycatАй бұрын
Finals: Berkeley wins on a 5-2. Aff: ad1: defense against aliens ad2: tech sharing (soft power) Neg: Agency Spec Budget Tix with a floor time link scenario
@superpaulycatАй бұрын
It was 5-0 decision in semis, my ballot glitched and I was told to pick the side that won instead of the team.
@petermoore6562Ай бұрын
the among us k will live on eternally
@superpaulycatАй бұрын
I could fix you...
@annesmith28122 ай бұрын
I do NFA-LD on a small squad (we only had one LDer last semester). I’ll admit I’m a bit biased because my coach judges a lot of NDT-CEDA, I’ve only been doing evidentiary debate for three years, and I care more about having good round than winning, but I loved having similar topics. There being more debaters reaserching the same topic greatly improved overall argumentation quality and I found a lot of good articles and books from CEDA-NDT files. I’ll admit I and other debaters stole some ideas from CEDA, but I don’t think it led us to do substantially less research. I get that having similar topics greatly rewards schools who do both and I understand why single event schools dislike that. I don’t know how it helps larger schools more; smaller schools probably benefit more from being able to more easily find good resources for research because of the CEDA files. I have mixed feelings on the time changes. I could see them making LD rounds better and think more experiments with them should happen. I often find myself wishing I could cross examine the 1AR or develop my CP more. Debate formats do kinda compete with each others for debaters and I worry that making LD longer would cause it to lose the main advantage it has over CEDA: shorter round and shorter tournaments.
@debatesenseiАй бұрын
Thanks for your insights
@Letsgrowtogethertraders2 ай бұрын
But what is this f&n?? Or am I getting old people.
@md.sohagmia87143 ай бұрын
How can I contact you? I can give you some t-ips to grow your channel.
@md.sohagmia87143 ай бұрын
Your video is excellent.
@AJP314153 ай бұрын
Go Beach!
@LAMDLDebate3 ай бұрын
Thanks for the shoutout Deven! Much love and appreciation to you both for this interview - very insightful.
@ZoneeVV4 ай бұрын
DEEEVIIINNNN‼️‼️‼️
@petermoore65624 ай бұрын
our GOAT paul
@trackerjacker6665 ай бұрын
keep making the content love it. however where is second half of video
@debatesensei3 ай бұрын
Sorry it took so long for us to find it, but here is the full episode! kzread.info/dash/bejne/jHeKm7Sfp9zZoqQ.html
@MinchK5 ай бұрын
Chad and Jared raise the issue of the old rule for full course citations. The purpose of this was actually super basic and practical when the committee adopted it. The Internet, as we know it now, was in its infancy in 1991 and most research was still conducted in libraries or on old school Lexis-Nexis. There was no Speech Drop and briefs were physically exchanged between debaters. It was necessary to be able to see the full citation in order to be able to track down those sources for opp research. The rule indicated that you had to provide the full citation the first time you read the source, but after that you could say "Smith, previously cited," which emulated the norm at the time in public address events. As the internet evolved and tracking-down sources became easier, this become less necessary.
@42base135 ай бұрын
Sometimes you really do need to have a few facts for an intelligent debate. Ironically, there are no CAFO subsidies in the United States. There haven't even been production subsidies on grains since 2006. There are subsidies on farmland, that serve to inflate the price of farmland and increase the cost of grain production, but those don't benefit CAFOs. CAFOs, especially for cattle, usually have a more diverse feed supply than smaller operations. That's mostly due to scale, as well as process efficiency. They can find the most economical source of protein, carbohydrates, fats, and fiber, and blend them into a balanced ration. That lets them efficiently use waste products from other parts of agriculture (cottonseed, soybean hulls, etc) that cannot be as easily used by small mixed operations. Oh, and cattle produce methane from fermenting cellulose. That mostly happens when they are on pasture, eating grass and hay. In the feedlots they are fed a more balanced diet with less cellulose and produce much less methane. Ah, good to hear that you know facts are irrelevant to a debate. They certainly are irrelevant to your discussion here. Animal welfare has many different metrics. From a physical health standpoint, animals in CAFOs usually have less disease and less death than animals raised in less intensive, less confined systems. On average, it's much less. The "mental health" question is much more questionable, but then you're really being anthropomorphic. CAFOs probably reduce the jobs associated with animal agriculture. They are very efficient in terms of human labor. Eliminating CAFOs would likely increase rural jobs. But, of course, eliminating farm subsidies won't have a direct effect on the number of CAFOs as they are mostly unaffected by them. The largest CAFO near me doesn't participate in the farm subsidy programs at all, even though they operate a significant amount of farmland to produce their feed and that farmland would be eligible for subsidies. They don't take the farmland subsides because they do come with strings and the CAFO doesn't deem the money worth the compliance hassles. The United States really should eliminate all farm subsidies, and I say that as a grain farmer who does take most subsidies for which I'm eligible. But eliminating the existing subsidies will have very little effect on the number of CAFOs.
@ProfessorAlPrimack6 ай бұрын
I have judged a handful of the debaters discussed in this podcast. Each was definitely worthy of the recognition they received in it.
@ProfessorAlPrimack7 ай бұрын
Another excellent episode! I shared some of this with my students already. Thanks for the great content.
@ProfessorAlPrimack7 ай бұрын
As a new director, I found the information in this video to be invaluable. I learned so much about how I can better structure pre-tournament work, practices, and even picked up some tips about team file-sharing/management. This was great. If at all possible, I would love to see a conversation facilitated between NFA-LD and CEDA-Policy coaches to dig into the similarities and differences regarding research and argument strategy between the two formats. For example, the topics are very similar this year, but the videos on key authors demonstrated great differences in who is read and what arguments are cut. I am sure there are other areas of difference and similarity too. I think that would be an illuminating discussion.
@debatesensei7 ай бұрын
I am very happy to hear this. This is exactly why I am doing this series. Please feel free to request topics. We will be taking a break from the series over the winter break, but plan to return for the last half of the debate season with more episodes.
@ProfessorAlPrimack8 ай бұрын
Another helpful video!
@debatesensei8 ай бұрын
Thank you. Feel free to request topics
@ProfessorAlPrimack8 ай бұрын
This was an incredibly helpful video. I shared it with some novice debaters because the broad view provided on common affirmatives will be especially helpful for them to understand the differences between each. Great work as always!
@debatesensei8 ай бұрын
It's comments like this that make the effort worth it. Thank you Alvin. Feel free to request any content you would find helpful.
@bwitt19849 ай бұрын
So many of the arguments in favor of the Electoral College don't actually reflect what the Electoral College does. It doesn't "give a voice" to rural states.
@erikgreer86789 ай бұрын
💕 *promo sm*
@dearleaderlorca9 ай бұрын
Great stuff. Glad to see some NFA publicity. Now is a great time for it.
@jlm37449 ай бұрын
I'm Puerto Rican. Puerto Rico is never going to be a state and it never should. You guys are correct about a lot of stuff that's happening on the island. All those referendums are total BS, we do not want statehood. The referendums are only setup by the very corrupt pro-statehood party PNP just as a political ploy to bring more of their supporters out to vote for them, they always get very low turnout and are all non-binding. if you do the math with all the referendum results and turnout, really its like 30% that vote or statehood, but some of the people who vote for statehood do want independence but vote statehood because they are pessimistic about Puerto Rico being its own country. Puerto Rican statehooders do not want to join the US because of "Equality", "Representation", "Civil Rights", or being "Proud Americans", all that stuff is what the corrupt statehood leaders from PNP say when they are in DC at congress trying to get the US politicians to feel pity and makes then want to give statehood to the island. If you ask average Puerto Rican statehood supporters why they want statehood, its all about just getting more money to live on welfare and that statehood is a magic wand that will make all the islands problems disappear. But thankful more Puerto Ricans are waking up to these lies because of all the corruption exposed in statehood movement and neglect by the US government. For the first time ever in the 2020 elections the pro-independence party broke out o the single digits at 15% with their candidate Juan Dalmau and with the new party MVC their candidate was also pro-independence and they got a combined 30%, so support for independence is growing big time. Congress is never going to give the island statehood, all those politicians in DC calling for Puerto Rico statehood are just virtue signaling because statehood for Puerto Rico is being thrown around the US as if its some civil rights movement, when really the statehood movement is a bunch of greedy corrupt people. And when they get into office they pretend to do little for the island to solve the status issue but then they just let any bill that would do so die. They know that statehood would be detrimental to both the US and Puerto Rico financially, politically, and culturally. And no territory has ever been admitted into the union out of pity and only to fix the territory, and there is no "Right to statehood". I agree Independence if the way to go because its the only way out of this current limbo status. The thing holding Puerto Rico back is the pessimism that Puerto Rico wont function as an independent country, so many statehood leaders have brainwashed Puerto Ricans that Independence will automatically turn the island into a third world isolationist communist dictatorship. Another this is that with the current parties there is tribalism the same corrupt people keep getting elected because a lot of Puerto Ricans also see the political parties like sports, that's another reason why PNP the corrupt statehood party candidates keep winning even though there is news every month about politicians in their party being arrest for corruption. But still slowly the younger generation is turning away from all this and growing in support of independence. We'll see what happens in the next election net year because the MVC and PIP parties are trying to form an alliance. Also if the PNP loses both the governorship and the legislator, then Puerto Rico being a tax haven for rich Americans to dodge taxes is going to come down. The governor Pedro Pierluisi and his administration are open about only using the tax breaks as leverage to bring in more rich Americans to pay less taxes to pressure congress to make the island a state and they know the tax breaks are not helping the island. Me personally, I want independence because of all the craziness happening in the US and to keep our culture. If we become a statehood, it wont fix the islands problems, its just going to bring the problems in the US to the island, and overtime we aren't going to be a Latin island state, we are going to become just some other state and lose our uniqueness. Puerto Rico is a Latin island nation with its own history, culture, and Spanish is the dominant language.
@debatesensei9 ай бұрын
Wow. You seem very passionate about the topic.
@jlm37449 ай бұрын
@debatesensei Yes I am. Those are the two topics I try to educate people on when I find a video that talks about them. The status issue and the tax breaks issue. Cause everyone in the US is pushing statehood because they are conflating it with DC statehood and making it into a civil rights movement when it's not. And so many people are moving to the island buying up everything because of these tax breaks and getting away with buying up public places, historical sites, and entire neighborhoods so they can't turn them all into private resorts and hotels to exploit our island and make a profit. And it's raising the cost of living and displacing us real Puerto Ricans.
@SharmaNidhi110 ай бұрын
Make such videos more, informative plus it's 1D babyyyyyyy🤪♥️
@nightfall90210 ай бұрын
Both sides went into this without a single thought about the collateral damage to people within their industry and innocent businesses outside. Each willing to sit back and blame the other for the fallout and hardships they have caused. The unions even have the audacity to point out some of the suffering while begging for public support as if they had nothing to do with it. This has nothing to do with the public that has been paying for a substandard product for well over 5 years. This is between the studios and the unions. The consumer was cut out long ago. This has all happened before... text vs film, silent vs sound, radio vs television, celluloid vs digital, practical vs FX.... on and on an on. Whatever happens it will go on. New will rise up to fill gaps or even replace the the old. Life goes on and changes happen.
@trudydonaldson633 Жыл бұрын
This song is timeless, Marvin was a genius, far beyond his year, the man had such insight, I am up in age now, and I still love this song and the message,❤🎉
@ronaldgillespie4728 Жыл бұрын
THA GREATEST ALBUM EVER 🙌 WHAT'S GOING ON RIP-SIP MR MARVIN GAYE 🙌 YOU ARE TRULY MISSED ❤️ 🙌 🙏 ♥️
@michaelanderson5975 Жыл бұрын
There's a lot going on in this album that is underlined for instance in his top selling hit what's going on he says only love can conquer hate and also what stands out in this album is the song flying high in the friendly sky without ever leaving the ground about drugs and drug use damn the verse how the dealer make slaves out of men I could go on and on Marvin Gaye told Smokey Robinson at Smoky sent there and Marvin was writing this album on that God was doing the writing and he was just the messenger 🥲
@laurentlacastellane4619 Жыл бұрын
Avril 2023 🇨🇵 Eh Marvin Brother !!! Repose toi en paix Là haut 🌠
@elliottrowe4568 Жыл бұрын
☝️ *promosm*
@thecartoonrobot Жыл бұрын
"Inbreathiate" is not a malapropism because it isn't a word, as Blanc points out. A malapropism is mistakenly using a real word in the wrong place. Inbreatheate is a nonce word, and cannot be a malapropism.
@debatesensei Жыл бұрын
We appreciate the clarity. Your correction appears to be completely accurate. We have found some explanations of malapropism that say it is simply using a made up word that sounds like a real word, but these are in the minority. Furthermore, your explanation seems to align better with the origin of the word itself. Thank you. (cdn.oxfordowl.co.uk/2016/06/21/15/44/21/480/Spoonerisms_Dahl_activity_sheet.pdf#:~:text=Spoonerism%20and%20malapropism%20are%20two,original%20words%20of%20these%20spoonerisms%3F&text=Malapropism%3A%20using%20a%20made%2Dup,sounds%20like%2C%20the%20original%20word.)
@cristianalima4115 Жыл бұрын
Pq?😪
@mattharms83 Жыл бұрын
Former parli debater here from the peak of popularity on your chart. This is a potentially great discussion, but Matt, my dude, you have to stop interrupting some really great discussion with the constant low-effort jokes, man.
@kaylahorne210 Жыл бұрын
❤
@cynthiatucker2147 Жыл бұрын
“Every thang is every thang” was the phrase back then. 😊
Jack White I wish I met the man truly unique love his Folk songs
@yuridia-yazminperalta-agui3360 Жыл бұрын
First
@TheAmericanPlayer1997 Жыл бұрын
That's a fact
@debatesensei Жыл бұрын
Use this list of figures of speech to get you started bitly.ws/AwrM
@budbud240 Жыл бұрын
Well if I'm just trying to be another artist then that's not inspiration
@debatesensei Жыл бұрын
What do you mean, "just trying to be another artist"?
@budbud240 Жыл бұрын
@@debatesensei some people make models to create peaces in a specific artists style
@debatesensei Жыл бұрын
Some artists do that without AI. If an artist chooses to create an impressionist, or cubist painting, that is in another artists style. Are they equally uninspired?
@debatesensei Жыл бұрын
Just to be clear, I appreciate your comments. I hope my questions do not imply otherwise.
Пікірлер
Love this song
Yeah, that music definitely goes with Mike Pence. 😂
Finals: Berkeley wins on a 5-2. Aff: ad1: defense against aliens ad2: tech sharing (soft power) Neg: Agency Spec Budget Tix with a floor time link scenario
It was 5-0 decision in semis, my ballot glitched and I was told to pick the side that won instead of the team.
the among us k will live on eternally
I could fix you...
I do NFA-LD on a small squad (we only had one LDer last semester). I’ll admit I’m a bit biased because my coach judges a lot of NDT-CEDA, I’ve only been doing evidentiary debate for three years, and I care more about having good round than winning, but I loved having similar topics. There being more debaters reaserching the same topic greatly improved overall argumentation quality and I found a lot of good articles and books from CEDA-NDT files. I’ll admit I and other debaters stole some ideas from CEDA, but I don’t think it led us to do substantially less research. I get that having similar topics greatly rewards schools who do both and I understand why single event schools dislike that. I don’t know how it helps larger schools more; smaller schools probably benefit more from being able to more easily find good resources for research because of the CEDA files. I have mixed feelings on the time changes. I could see them making LD rounds better and think more experiments with them should happen. I often find myself wishing I could cross examine the 1AR or develop my CP more. Debate formats do kinda compete with each others for debaters and I worry that making LD longer would cause it to lose the main advantage it has over CEDA: shorter round and shorter tournaments.
Thanks for your insights
But what is this f&n?? Or am I getting old people.
How can I contact you? I can give you some t-ips to grow your channel.
Your video is excellent.
Go Beach!
Thanks for the shoutout Deven! Much love and appreciation to you both for this interview - very insightful.
DEEEVIIINNNN‼️‼️‼️
our GOAT paul
keep making the content love it. however where is second half of video
Sorry it took so long for us to find it, but here is the full episode! kzread.info/dash/bejne/jHeKm7Sfp9zZoqQ.html
Chad and Jared raise the issue of the old rule for full course citations. The purpose of this was actually super basic and practical when the committee adopted it. The Internet, as we know it now, was in its infancy in 1991 and most research was still conducted in libraries or on old school Lexis-Nexis. There was no Speech Drop and briefs were physically exchanged between debaters. It was necessary to be able to see the full citation in order to be able to track down those sources for opp research. The rule indicated that you had to provide the full citation the first time you read the source, but after that you could say "Smith, previously cited," which emulated the norm at the time in public address events. As the internet evolved and tracking-down sources became easier, this become less necessary.
Sometimes you really do need to have a few facts for an intelligent debate. Ironically, there are no CAFO subsidies in the United States. There haven't even been production subsidies on grains since 2006. There are subsidies on farmland, that serve to inflate the price of farmland and increase the cost of grain production, but those don't benefit CAFOs. CAFOs, especially for cattle, usually have a more diverse feed supply than smaller operations. That's mostly due to scale, as well as process efficiency. They can find the most economical source of protein, carbohydrates, fats, and fiber, and blend them into a balanced ration. That lets them efficiently use waste products from other parts of agriculture (cottonseed, soybean hulls, etc) that cannot be as easily used by small mixed operations. Oh, and cattle produce methane from fermenting cellulose. That mostly happens when they are on pasture, eating grass and hay. In the feedlots they are fed a more balanced diet with less cellulose and produce much less methane. Ah, good to hear that you know facts are irrelevant to a debate. They certainly are irrelevant to your discussion here. Animal welfare has many different metrics. From a physical health standpoint, animals in CAFOs usually have less disease and less death than animals raised in less intensive, less confined systems. On average, it's much less. The "mental health" question is much more questionable, but then you're really being anthropomorphic. CAFOs probably reduce the jobs associated with animal agriculture. They are very efficient in terms of human labor. Eliminating CAFOs would likely increase rural jobs. But, of course, eliminating farm subsidies won't have a direct effect on the number of CAFOs as they are mostly unaffected by them. The largest CAFO near me doesn't participate in the farm subsidy programs at all, even though they operate a significant amount of farmland to produce their feed and that farmland would be eligible for subsidies. They don't take the farmland subsides because they do come with strings and the CAFO doesn't deem the money worth the compliance hassles. The United States really should eliminate all farm subsidies, and I say that as a grain farmer who does take most subsidies for which I'm eligible. But eliminating the existing subsidies will have very little effect on the number of CAFOs.
I have judged a handful of the debaters discussed in this podcast. Each was definitely worthy of the recognition they received in it.
Another excellent episode! I shared some of this with my students already. Thanks for the great content.
As a new director, I found the information in this video to be invaluable. I learned so much about how I can better structure pre-tournament work, practices, and even picked up some tips about team file-sharing/management. This was great. If at all possible, I would love to see a conversation facilitated between NFA-LD and CEDA-Policy coaches to dig into the similarities and differences regarding research and argument strategy between the two formats. For example, the topics are very similar this year, but the videos on key authors demonstrated great differences in who is read and what arguments are cut. I am sure there are other areas of difference and similarity too. I think that would be an illuminating discussion.
I am very happy to hear this. This is exactly why I am doing this series. Please feel free to request topics. We will be taking a break from the series over the winter break, but plan to return for the last half of the debate season with more episodes.
Another helpful video!
Thank you. Feel free to request topics
This was an incredibly helpful video. I shared it with some novice debaters because the broad view provided on common affirmatives will be especially helpful for them to understand the differences between each. Great work as always!
It's comments like this that make the effort worth it. Thank you Alvin. Feel free to request any content you would find helpful.
So many of the arguments in favor of the Electoral College don't actually reflect what the Electoral College does. It doesn't "give a voice" to rural states.
💕 *promo sm*
Great stuff. Glad to see some NFA publicity. Now is a great time for it.
I'm Puerto Rican. Puerto Rico is never going to be a state and it never should. You guys are correct about a lot of stuff that's happening on the island. All those referendums are total BS, we do not want statehood. The referendums are only setup by the very corrupt pro-statehood party PNP just as a political ploy to bring more of their supporters out to vote for them, they always get very low turnout and are all non-binding. if you do the math with all the referendum results and turnout, really its like 30% that vote or statehood, but some of the people who vote for statehood do want independence but vote statehood because they are pessimistic about Puerto Rico being its own country. Puerto Rican statehooders do not want to join the US because of "Equality", "Representation", "Civil Rights", or being "Proud Americans", all that stuff is what the corrupt statehood leaders from PNP say when they are in DC at congress trying to get the US politicians to feel pity and makes then want to give statehood to the island. If you ask average Puerto Rican statehood supporters why they want statehood, its all about just getting more money to live on welfare and that statehood is a magic wand that will make all the islands problems disappear. But thankful more Puerto Ricans are waking up to these lies because of all the corruption exposed in statehood movement and neglect by the US government. For the first time ever in the 2020 elections the pro-independence party broke out o the single digits at 15% with their candidate Juan Dalmau and with the new party MVC their candidate was also pro-independence and they got a combined 30%, so support for independence is growing big time. Congress is never going to give the island statehood, all those politicians in DC calling for Puerto Rico statehood are just virtue signaling because statehood for Puerto Rico is being thrown around the US as if its some civil rights movement, when really the statehood movement is a bunch of greedy corrupt people. And when they get into office they pretend to do little for the island to solve the status issue but then they just let any bill that would do so die. They know that statehood would be detrimental to both the US and Puerto Rico financially, politically, and culturally. And no territory has ever been admitted into the union out of pity and only to fix the territory, and there is no "Right to statehood". I agree Independence if the way to go because its the only way out of this current limbo status. The thing holding Puerto Rico back is the pessimism that Puerto Rico wont function as an independent country, so many statehood leaders have brainwashed Puerto Ricans that Independence will automatically turn the island into a third world isolationist communist dictatorship. Another this is that with the current parties there is tribalism the same corrupt people keep getting elected because a lot of Puerto Ricans also see the political parties like sports, that's another reason why PNP the corrupt statehood party candidates keep winning even though there is news every month about politicians in their party being arrest for corruption. But still slowly the younger generation is turning away from all this and growing in support of independence. We'll see what happens in the next election net year because the MVC and PIP parties are trying to form an alliance. Also if the PNP loses both the governorship and the legislator, then Puerto Rico being a tax haven for rich Americans to dodge taxes is going to come down. The governor Pedro Pierluisi and his administration are open about only using the tax breaks as leverage to bring in more rich Americans to pay less taxes to pressure congress to make the island a state and they know the tax breaks are not helping the island. Me personally, I want independence because of all the craziness happening in the US and to keep our culture. If we become a statehood, it wont fix the islands problems, its just going to bring the problems in the US to the island, and overtime we aren't going to be a Latin island state, we are going to become just some other state and lose our uniqueness. Puerto Rico is a Latin island nation with its own history, culture, and Spanish is the dominant language.
Wow. You seem very passionate about the topic.
@debatesensei Yes I am. Those are the two topics I try to educate people on when I find a video that talks about them. The status issue and the tax breaks issue. Cause everyone in the US is pushing statehood because they are conflating it with DC statehood and making it into a civil rights movement when it's not. And so many people are moving to the island buying up everything because of these tax breaks and getting away with buying up public places, historical sites, and entire neighborhoods so they can't turn them all into private resorts and hotels to exploit our island and make a profit. And it's raising the cost of living and displacing us real Puerto Ricans.
Make such videos more, informative plus it's 1D babyyyyyyy🤪♥️
Both sides went into this without a single thought about the collateral damage to people within their industry and innocent businesses outside. Each willing to sit back and blame the other for the fallout and hardships they have caused. The unions even have the audacity to point out some of the suffering while begging for public support as if they had nothing to do with it. This has nothing to do with the public that has been paying for a substandard product for well over 5 years. This is between the studios and the unions. The consumer was cut out long ago. This has all happened before... text vs film, silent vs sound, radio vs television, celluloid vs digital, practical vs FX.... on and on an on. Whatever happens it will go on. New will rise up to fill gaps or even replace the the old. Life goes on and changes happen.
This song is timeless, Marvin was a genius, far beyond his year, the man had such insight, I am up in age now, and I still love this song and the message,❤🎉
THA GREATEST ALBUM EVER 🙌 WHAT'S GOING ON RIP-SIP MR MARVIN GAYE 🙌 YOU ARE TRULY MISSED ❤️ 🙌 🙏 ♥️
There's a lot going on in this album that is underlined for instance in his top selling hit what's going on he says only love can conquer hate and also what stands out in this album is the song flying high in the friendly sky without ever leaving the ground about drugs and drug use damn the verse how the dealer make slaves out of men I could go on and on Marvin Gaye told Smokey Robinson at Smoky sent there and Marvin was writing this album on that God was doing the writing and he was just the messenger 🥲
Avril 2023 🇨🇵 Eh Marvin Brother !!! Repose toi en paix Là haut 🌠
☝️ *promosm*
"Inbreathiate" is not a malapropism because it isn't a word, as Blanc points out. A malapropism is mistakenly using a real word in the wrong place. Inbreatheate is a nonce word, and cannot be a malapropism.
We appreciate the clarity. Your correction appears to be completely accurate. We have found some explanations of malapropism that say it is simply using a made up word that sounds like a real word, but these are in the minority. Furthermore, your explanation seems to align better with the origin of the word itself. Thank you. (cdn.oxfordowl.co.uk/2016/06/21/15/44/21/480/Spoonerisms_Dahl_activity_sheet.pdf#:~:text=Spoonerism%20and%20malapropism%20are%20two,original%20words%20of%20these%20spoonerisms%3F&text=Malapropism%3A%20using%20a%20made%2Dup,sounds%20like%2C%20the%20original%20word.)
Pq?😪
Former parli debater here from the peak of popularity on your chart. This is a potentially great discussion, but Matt, my dude, you have to stop interrupting some really great discussion with the constant low-effort jokes, man.
❤
“Every thang is every thang” was the phrase back then. 😊
What is going on?🤴🙏✌️
I LOVE THIS SONG!!!♥️
Não me canso de ouvir essa linda música 😄😋
Where can i find Alex's paper?
drive.google.com/file/d/1HD1wnVScrGZi1ABK_pfeZWR2db9Jwib7/view?usp=sharing
finally,a steel guitar.
what kind of music is this supposed to be?
Interesting....best song of that decade
Academia’s profligate esoteric vapid sesquipedalian pleonastic prolix locution transmogrifies concatenated ratiocinative cogitation into arcanity.
Jack White I wish I met the man truly unique love his Folk songs
First
That's a fact
Use this list of figures of speech to get you started bitly.ws/AwrM
Well if I'm just trying to be another artist then that's not inspiration
What do you mean, "just trying to be another artist"?
@@debatesensei some people make models to create peaces in a specific artists style
Some artists do that without AI. If an artist chooses to create an impressionist, or cubist painting, that is in another artists style. Are they equally uninspired?
Just to be clear, I appreciate your comments. I hope my questions do not imply otherwise.