Wow, who needs a jet when you have a Rocket! Excellent Ride.
@segounlocks502911 күн бұрын
Okay its obvious pepole leaving comments do not own one of these. Because if they did you could clealry see his engine computer has the wrong flash.
@rumym22 күн бұрын
Since you fly both the G3X and Dynon you should do a comparison video and talk about your thoughts and preference
@mikercflyer738327 күн бұрын
Hi, I am new to your channel and really enjoy it, I have a question, are you using oxygen right from takeoff? Safe travels
@cecilmashburn734327 күн бұрын
How ironic, mine barely runs. Loves to cut out. God forbid you pull it back.
@Patrake555Ай бұрын
For all the helicycle a saw,you’re have the best leg-pad looking 👀 ❤😊.have a nice fly !😊
@Chrismarquez7Ай бұрын
Pretty sure this plane was parked at Whiteman Airport.
@dbnpoldermans4120Ай бұрын
3rd is very good!
@philipritson8821Ай бұрын
When did tricycle gear become "traditional"?
@baronpilot2bbАй бұрын
About 1960 when they figured out that having the CG in front of the mains provided more stability, easier loading, and better visibility while taxing. I don’t want to get into the tail wheel vs Bose wheel argument, but anyone that wants a comfortable plane has a Bose wheel. How many airliners, business jets, turboprops, or even general aviation planes that are single engine have tailwheels? None.
@thomasaltruda1243Ай бұрын
37:22 except for that pesky “250 knots indicated below 10” rule.. great video though!
@PecanLaneАй бұрын
Your next video is on the cirrus, did you get rid of this plane?
@baronpilot2bbАй бұрын
Yes, great plane. Wife wanted more baggage room and a parachute.
@johnhawthorne47162 ай бұрын
Watchin this on 3 mobile fones
@mts9822 ай бұрын
why not buy turbo model?
@baronpilot2bb2 ай бұрын
$30k more, less useful load, need to be over 11k to see any real speed benefit, more maintenance, more fuel burn. In my TR182 it was somewhat underpowered at 235HP and needed the turbo to make higher HP above 6-7k. This plane makes 310HP and still makes 200HP at 11k which is plenty. If I was flying the Rockies a lot or high density altitude I would buy the turbo, but for the majority of my trips I am flying at a 1500 DA and my highest obstacles entities are 7k or less.
@mts9822 ай бұрын
@@baronpilot2bb good to know, thanks.
@mts9822 ай бұрын
@@baronpilot2bb seems like this plane will suit you well. enjoy it.
@williamkennedy20692 ай бұрын
Niiiiice! So how often do the avionics go bad? Are you considered taking it all out and just put it in a brand new garment
@baronpilot2bb2 ай бұрын
The Entega PFD/MFD can be problematic and they are &8k each flat rate rebuild or warranty for $2500 per year. They would be the only thing I would replace as the center stack is the best you can get and is only 6 years old. If I thought the Entegra was more reliable I would leave it because I really like the way it works.
@eminye12 ай бұрын
Great to see you posting updates, totally agree with you about shock cooling, every time you shutdown a piston you essentially are shock cooling.
@JH-tk6oi2 ай бұрын
Your air conditioned RV14A was such a cool airplane- wish I would have seen it for sale. The parachute is nice tho and Cirrus interiors are top notch. Awesome info- thanks for posting.
@garyyouens290110 күн бұрын
I have a beautiful RV14A that has everything. 2 x G3x, pro built, aerotronics panel, backup alt + battieries. light. 100 hours. Would consider selling.
@apennameandthata20172 ай бұрын
They want you to have special training so fewer people die. It works.
@ARyanCoke2 ай бұрын
You said your Pressurization is trying too maintain sea level? You might not be setting it properly if that is what it's trying to to.. It should be trying to maintain 4.6 psi through the outflow valve, not the max differential valve.
@karrpilot70922 ай бұрын
The AOPA did a study. In said study, they said that if one wasn't flying 70 hours a year, one shouldn't own an aircraft. Of any type. I have been a rental pilot for over 20 years, and never got out of currency.
@MrNyc4Life2 ай бұрын
What if it's running too slow ? How can I increase it ?
@johnsmithSongbird2 ай бұрын
I do know These things can kill you When you are in the air you never know what is coming
@user-fh7cz7eo8l2 ай бұрын
what did you use it for 😂
@baxwell35402 ай бұрын
have to drive like mantequilla my friend
@reddye23312 ай бұрын
Dude came in hot then just about started tilling up the top soil there. Tht was sketchy
@rogersmart17662 ай бұрын
What do you normally cruise af normally ? I’m guessing 220 Kya’s!
@rogersmart17662 ай бұрын
Guessing 220ktas
@barrycliborn51692 ай бұрын
Can you comment on the a/c system?
@scottrc53912 ай бұрын
Would like to hear your thoughts comparing this to the Mosquito. Mosquito has belt drive up to the rotorhead but apparently does not use the turbine positioning as a clutch like this. Visibility is also supposedly better and most significantly to me, rotor inertia is supposed to be very good.
@olehippy132 ай бұрын
that is awesome... I would love to have one. what is the cost of one?
@joecraven20343 ай бұрын
Excellent review!
@GavMommy3 ай бұрын
I sure appreciate your video walkthrough! I am currently installing a very similar Dynon HDX system in my 1981 Turbo 182 Fixed Gear and my installer is not sure we can connect the fuel pressure gauge to the Dynon engine monitor. On our planes the fuel pressure is not referenced to atmospheric pressure as it is in a naturally aspirated engine, it's a differential fuel pressure as compared to the manifold pressure. I don't see a big round gauge for MP/FP in your beautiful new panel. Can you provide me with any insight on this matter? Thank you, Scott.
@baronpilot2bb3 ай бұрын
Fuel pressure will work with your engine as will MP as well. This plane has fuel and manifold pressure on the Dynon. Dynon makes sensors for yours as well.
@dennisanonym86583 ай бұрын
A good video. But I absolutely cannot understand why we still use an outdated engine system in which you have to adjust the fuel mixture yourself? There are now engines that can do this themselves. In addition, you can integrate a turbocharger, for example, which is set up so that the engine always has the air pressure available as at MSL.
@baronpilot2bb3 ай бұрын
Good question. The problem with automation is that it can fail and must have multiple backups, especially with having only one engine. Unlike a car, you run airplane engines at a fixed power setting for the duration of the flight. There are no stop signs, other planes in the way to slow down for, etc, so you use the indication technology to set an ideal mixture and it stays that way since you are not changing power settings. Turbos are a good addition and I considered installing one. The problem is cost first at around $30k to properly design and install and then you also increase maintenance cost. The benefit of a turbo in a plane like the RV-14 is non existent below 8k ft and really only becomes a good advantage above 14k ft. The 14 with a 210 HP IO-390 will initially climb at 2k FPM and will still maintain nearly 1k per minute at 10K ft. The idea of a 14 is to have a plane that performs well in all categories - climb, top speed, short field, handling. When you install anti-ice, turbos, etc you change the weight and other dynamics that take away from the original intent of the plane. If you want ultimate speed you buy a Lancair IV-P. If you want ultimate short field you buy a Carbon Cub. If you want something in the middle you buy a RV.
@industrieundtechnik17613 ай бұрын
Where is the duke ???????????????????? I found none of your videos is about it ! You 0 Boy !
@user-oj9bx3tc2q3 ай бұрын
That is the very plane (N9462L) I learned to fly in back in 1974-75 at then-Patrick Henry Airport in Newport News, VA. At the time, however, the plane was yellow.
@user-oj9bx3tc2q3 ай бұрын
That is the very plane (N9462L) I learned to fly in back in 1974-75 at then-Patrick Henry Airport in Newport News, VA. Back then, however, the plane was yellow.
@trevordugan79933 ай бұрын
Does the 650 have a built-in audio panel? How'd you do that without a GMA 345 or equivalent?
@williamkennedy20693 ай бұрын
Above the autopilot is a garmin650? Why did you have that since you have two G3's?
@baronpilot2bbАй бұрын
Autopilot is built into the g3x. The 6(0 is a GPS navigator.
@simonhughes-king84937 күн бұрын
@@baronpilot2bb I think he meant - why do you have the 650 when you have two G3x screens - its a VFR/IFR navigation question, not an AP question.
@rileybullen49613 ай бұрын
Was it bumpy?
@jamikest13 ай бұрын
Just wanted to say thanks for the pair of Rv14 videos! Extremely thorough and great overall impression.
@bradkeener074 ай бұрын
Is this 38CE? I'm pretty sure this is my baron!
@validatedcustomer6044 ай бұрын
Go there!….
@MatthewMalone4 ай бұрын
Go on, what did you use it for in high school?
@Amcoglu4 ай бұрын
Awesome!! Is there force feedback? 👀
@muhammadsteinberg4 ай бұрын
You and Mark over at Skywagon University have really complicated things for me. I'm presently in the beginning stages of buying an airplane to replace a 172 I sold. Constant unforeseen personal challenges are slowing my RV-10 build. Life without an airplane nibbling at my wallet is not natural...lol Had my sights on a Mooney M20J 201 until Turbo 182's with retracts caught my attention. Already being a longtime member of cessna pilots association the 182 is calling out to me. You and Mark have done an awesome job of providing some specific owner/operator information of great interest to me. Every potential seller of the model should be giving you guys a cut of the cash..
@flyingjeff1956Ай бұрын
You don't want the complications of Cessna retracts unless you REALLY have a need. But a 182 is quite a machine. So is the Mooney, just tighter.
@wallywally82824 ай бұрын
Amazing the amount of driver who don’t hang on to the stick whilst taxiing or have a hand on the throttle especially after take off! Poor airmanship!
@berniebrown91154 ай бұрын
You do a great job giving her positive reinforcement
@riverawc14 ай бұрын
That was great. Thanks for taking us along
@lukekirk74874 ай бұрын
This is a great video👍 So much for 250 under 10 though.
@wangfury4 ай бұрын
That's indicated airspeed.
@lukekirk74874 ай бұрын
@@wangfury yeah… exactly.
@garyhoward40645 ай бұрын
I had a Glasair III for a few years. Not as well equipped as yours but lovely plane. No switching of fuel tanks on mine. I had the manual flaps which I prefer. Would pull 10 degrees flaps at 140 knots before lowering the gear making approaches much easier (plane can apparently handle 160 kts at 10 degrees). However, found it difficult in instrument conditions as it is over sensitive in pitch and the spring trim (no tab) is suboptimal. It’s the only plane I really miss. Cheap and fast.
Пікірлер
Wow, who needs a jet when you have a Rocket! Excellent Ride.
Okay its obvious pepole leaving comments do not own one of these. Because if they did you could clealry see his engine computer has the wrong flash.
Since you fly both the G3X and Dynon you should do a comparison video and talk about your thoughts and preference
Hi, I am new to your channel and really enjoy it, I have a question, are you using oxygen right from takeoff? Safe travels
How ironic, mine barely runs. Loves to cut out. God forbid you pull it back.
For all the helicycle a saw,you’re have the best leg-pad looking 👀 ❤😊.have a nice fly !😊
Pretty sure this plane was parked at Whiteman Airport.
3rd is very good!
When did tricycle gear become "traditional"?
About 1960 when they figured out that having the CG in front of the mains provided more stability, easier loading, and better visibility while taxing. I don’t want to get into the tail wheel vs Bose wheel argument, but anyone that wants a comfortable plane has a Bose wheel. How many airliners, business jets, turboprops, or even general aviation planes that are single engine have tailwheels? None.
37:22 except for that pesky “250 knots indicated below 10” rule.. great video though!
Your next video is on the cirrus, did you get rid of this plane?
Yes, great plane. Wife wanted more baggage room and a parachute.
Watchin this on 3 mobile fones
why not buy turbo model?
$30k more, less useful load, need to be over 11k to see any real speed benefit, more maintenance, more fuel burn. In my TR182 it was somewhat underpowered at 235HP and needed the turbo to make higher HP above 6-7k. This plane makes 310HP and still makes 200HP at 11k which is plenty. If I was flying the Rockies a lot or high density altitude I would buy the turbo, but for the majority of my trips I am flying at a 1500 DA and my highest obstacles entities are 7k or less.
@@baronpilot2bb good to know, thanks.
@@baronpilot2bb seems like this plane will suit you well. enjoy it.
Niiiiice! So how often do the avionics go bad? Are you considered taking it all out and just put it in a brand new garment
The Entega PFD/MFD can be problematic and they are &8k each flat rate rebuild or warranty for $2500 per year. They would be the only thing I would replace as the center stack is the best you can get and is only 6 years old. If I thought the Entegra was more reliable I would leave it because I really like the way it works.
Great to see you posting updates, totally agree with you about shock cooling, every time you shutdown a piston you essentially are shock cooling.
Your air conditioned RV14A was such a cool airplane- wish I would have seen it for sale. The parachute is nice tho and Cirrus interiors are top notch. Awesome info- thanks for posting.
I have a beautiful RV14A that has everything. 2 x G3x, pro built, aerotronics panel, backup alt + battieries. light. 100 hours. Would consider selling.
They want you to have special training so fewer people die. It works.
You said your Pressurization is trying too maintain sea level? You might not be setting it properly if that is what it's trying to to.. It should be trying to maintain 4.6 psi through the outflow valve, not the max differential valve.
The AOPA did a study. In said study, they said that if one wasn't flying 70 hours a year, one shouldn't own an aircraft. Of any type. I have been a rental pilot for over 20 years, and never got out of currency.
What if it's running too slow ? How can I increase it ?
I do know These things can kill you When you are in the air you never know what is coming
what did you use it for 😂
have to drive like mantequilla my friend
Dude came in hot then just about started tilling up the top soil there. Tht was sketchy
What do you normally cruise af normally ? I’m guessing 220 Kya’s!
Guessing 220ktas
Can you comment on the a/c system?
Would like to hear your thoughts comparing this to the Mosquito. Mosquito has belt drive up to the rotorhead but apparently does not use the turbine positioning as a clutch like this. Visibility is also supposedly better and most significantly to me, rotor inertia is supposed to be very good.
that is awesome... I would love to have one. what is the cost of one?
Excellent review!
I sure appreciate your video walkthrough! I am currently installing a very similar Dynon HDX system in my 1981 Turbo 182 Fixed Gear and my installer is not sure we can connect the fuel pressure gauge to the Dynon engine monitor. On our planes the fuel pressure is not referenced to atmospheric pressure as it is in a naturally aspirated engine, it's a differential fuel pressure as compared to the manifold pressure. I don't see a big round gauge for MP/FP in your beautiful new panel. Can you provide me with any insight on this matter? Thank you, Scott.
Fuel pressure will work with your engine as will MP as well. This plane has fuel and manifold pressure on the Dynon. Dynon makes sensors for yours as well.
A good video. But I absolutely cannot understand why we still use an outdated engine system in which you have to adjust the fuel mixture yourself? There are now engines that can do this themselves. In addition, you can integrate a turbocharger, for example, which is set up so that the engine always has the air pressure available as at MSL.
Good question. The problem with automation is that it can fail and must have multiple backups, especially with having only one engine. Unlike a car, you run airplane engines at a fixed power setting for the duration of the flight. There are no stop signs, other planes in the way to slow down for, etc, so you use the indication technology to set an ideal mixture and it stays that way since you are not changing power settings. Turbos are a good addition and I considered installing one. The problem is cost first at around $30k to properly design and install and then you also increase maintenance cost. The benefit of a turbo in a plane like the RV-14 is non existent below 8k ft and really only becomes a good advantage above 14k ft. The 14 with a 210 HP IO-390 will initially climb at 2k FPM and will still maintain nearly 1k per minute at 10K ft. The idea of a 14 is to have a plane that performs well in all categories - climb, top speed, short field, handling. When you install anti-ice, turbos, etc you change the weight and other dynamics that take away from the original intent of the plane. If you want ultimate speed you buy a Lancair IV-P. If you want ultimate short field you buy a Carbon Cub. If you want something in the middle you buy a RV.
Where is the duke ???????????????????? I found none of your videos is about it ! You 0 Boy !
That is the very plane (N9462L) I learned to fly in back in 1974-75 at then-Patrick Henry Airport in Newport News, VA. At the time, however, the plane was yellow.
That is the very plane (N9462L) I learned to fly in back in 1974-75 at then-Patrick Henry Airport in Newport News, VA. Back then, however, the plane was yellow.
Does the 650 have a built-in audio panel? How'd you do that without a GMA 345 or equivalent?
Above the autopilot is a garmin650? Why did you have that since you have two G3's?
Autopilot is built into the g3x. The 6(0 is a GPS navigator.
@@baronpilot2bb I think he meant - why do you have the 650 when you have two G3x screens - its a VFR/IFR navigation question, not an AP question.
Was it bumpy?
Just wanted to say thanks for the pair of Rv14 videos! Extremely thorough and great overall impression.
Is this 38CE? I'm pretty sure this is my baron!
Go there!….
Go on, what did you use it for in high school?
Awesome!! Is there force feedback? 👀
You and Mark over at Skywagon University have really complicated things for me. I'm presently in the beginning stages of buying an airplane to replace a 172 I sold. Constant unforeseen personal challenges are slowing my RV-10 build. Life without an airplane nibbling at my wallet is not natural...lol Had my sights on a Mooney M20J 201 until Turbo 182's with retracts caught my attention. Already being a longtime member of cessna pilots association the 182 is calling out to me. You and Mark have done an awesome job of providing some specific owner/operator information of great interest to me. Every potential seller of the model should be giving you guys a cut of the cash..
You don't want the complications of Cessna retracts unless you REALLY have a need. But a 182 is quite a machine. So is the Mooney, just tighter.
Amazing the amount of driver who don’t hang on to the stick whilst taxiing or have a hand on the throttle especially after take off! Poor airmanship!
You do a great job giving her positive reinforcement
That was great. Thanks for taking us along
This is a great video👍 So much for 250 under 10 though.
That's indicated airspeed.
@@wangfury yeah… exactly.
I had a Glasair III for a few years. Not as well equipped as yours but lovely plane. No switching of fuel tanks on mine. I had the manual flaps which I prefer. Would pull 10 degrees flaps at 140 knots before lowering the gear making approaches much easier (plane can apparently handle 160 kts at 10 degrees). However, found it difficult in instrument conditions as it is over sensitive in pitch and the spring trim (no tab) is suboptimal. It’s the only plane I really miss. Cheap and fast.
Great video thanks
Nice plane, congratulations