Please click the link to watch our other Weapon Detective videos kzread.info/head/PLEMWqyRZP_LrdqB-XbqY2LocUVEaG_w7D Please click the link to watch our other Chinese Systems videos kzread.info/head/PLEMWqyRZP_LoJXFBUYN75biwfUhMq1osE Please click the link to watch our other Weapon Detective-Air videos kzread.info/head/PLEMWqyRZP_LrGyENf3nqsYKC9ZkWH414k

@laosasean8482

5 ай бұрын

All aircraft have wing and wheel so is copied, you expect China to built aircraft like tank and no wing and how on earth is going create lift and then fly.

Excellent video. The analysis section made me laugh. "aircraft never says, I cannot transport the cargo because I am just a copy". and the design is hilarious.

@user-dn8cv6cz7s

5 ай бұрын

请继续笑下去🤭

Fun fact, China ordered around 80 IL76 from Russia in the earlier 2000s, due to the production line issue, they canceled the orders and returned the down payment with D30 engines. 😂😂

It’s only superficial similarities on the outside. A lot of planes with similar roles will look the same. For example, you can’t take a part from the Y20 and use it on the C17. This analysis is amateurish 😅

Another less-known aircraft, at least from the European perspective. Thank you

Good video and even better editorial.

Another wonderful video was shared by an excellent ( weapon 🕵️‍♀️ 🕵️‍♂️) channel, video about Xian Y -20 Kunpeng airplane..video clearly explained all its characteristics and its military transportation capabilities...thank you 🙏 ( weapon defective) channel for sharing

Copying a functioning aircraft is not making a xerox copy

@andrulifts

5 ай бұрын

it doesn’t matter. we are a society of laws

@fernandoferreira-do8vh

5 ай бұрын

@@andrulifts donde estan las reglas ahora?

@andrulifts

5 ай бұрын

I understand china does not follow intellectually property laws because they have nothing to lose and everything to gain@@fernandoferreira-do8vh

@brianjordan-5357

5 ай бұрын

​@fernandoferreira-do8vh International law prohibits industrial espionage and producing unlicensed copies.

@kentershackle1329

5 ай бұрын

​@andrulifts Loopsided Laws that's only benefited WHITEMAN Countries?.

Huh. First. First time ever. Admittedly, was 20hrs early by mistake, but still. I thought I’d feel differently.

las cosas no son del dueño si no de quien las necesita, si es copia o no a nadie le importa, solo importa que haga su trabajo

I'd like think the Y-20 as the better IL-76. How the IL-76 should have look like in this mordern times if you look closely they are pretty similer

@accountantthe3394

4 ай бұрын

You're right brother. If anything, claims of Y20 copying should be attributed to its original lineage IL-76 since China procured them in bulk and didn't have access to C-5 and C-17s.

Please make a video about the Y-9 aircraft.

Good work

Hello. Could you please check out the Turkish-made armed unmanned marine vehicle in the next video? ULAQ-MARLİN-SANCAR

Make about agtms, c90 rocket launcher, matador atgm,pf-98

Looks more like a c141 star lifter than a C5 to me.

@peekaboopeekaboo1165

5 ай бұрын

Closer to C 17 actually...

@downtomars6268

5 ай бұрын

Looks like neither.

@BengalLancer

5 ай бұрын

​​@@downtomars6268White Americans can't think beyond the borders except for considering blacks as Africans but themselves as Americans

@laosasean8482

5 ай бұрын

@@peekaboopeekaboo1165 Totally different high wing and better aerodynamics than C-17.

isn't China supercomputer also called Kunpeng or something like that

@junhualiu6562

5 ай бұрын

Nah, the best supercomputer in China nowadays is actually called Sunway Taihulight or 神威·太湖之光, which is even more mythical to me than Kunpeng.

Rome built an Empire on a sword invented by barbarians from Spain

it is only copying if the knowing dont want to share the knowledge. if they share it is called learning

Before the war, Japan paid a proper "license fee" (due to bad relations between the Imperial Army and Navy, they paid "double" the license fee for DB601). Of course, we still pay today. 戦前の日本はちゃんと”ライセンス料”を支払いましたよ（帝国陸、海軍の仲が悪かったので、DB601には”2倍”のライセンス料を支払っています）。もちろん現代でもお支払いしております。

They copy because the US sets a standard so thats what they doing. All cargo have the wings mounted up high and a T-tail. The engines look more like the IL-76 uses with a front fuselage looks like a 787 Dreamliner in the front fascia.

The Y-20 and C-17 both have underwing engines, the C-17 uses jet flaps, and the Y-20 uses conventional large-area flaps. As the core design of an aircraft, the wings of these two transport aircraft are different. Before you say that the Y-20 plagiarizes the C-17, would you like to use your brain to do some homework?

Nothing To See Here Just China Playing "chubby bunny"

What's even to say about this aircraft? It hauls stuff. It needs better engines. It has flown to Serbia. It can be the basis of other specialized aircraft. What else is there to say?

Ukrainians helped designed the landing gears?

15 Premiere im live with in a row

@WeaponDetective

5 ай бұрын

Thanks for being one of our most loyal viewers.💖💖

The way you analyze stuff make me think you probably have managed some real R&D projects.

The Chinese are very developed, the community of G-7 states (777 million inhabitants) is already in ruins and will soon be just a bad memory, the community of BRICS states (4.5 billion inhabitants) has incredible resources and unlimited energy, they have the latest innovations too, they have the future. (NATO has no chance if this Anti-NATO community with 4.5 billion citizens forms its own united military community) 🤔 ​

@PopulismIsForBottomFeeders

17 күн бұрын

Best laugh I've had all day! 🤣

Those engines look like they came from 1957.

@AndreaDAuria1

5 ай бұрын

Yep, not exactly high-bypass😅

Using a relational database management system 😂😂😂

Obviously the engines are from the 60ies with low bypass ratio. If they can refit with at least 80ies engines they can use the free room from less fuel consumption to give the market a viable low cost alternativ to western transport planes. Before they can produce a plane on par with western planes, they need to develop a modern engine. Not sure if they made any progress though. The J20 engine is an old concept from the CF56.

@ZxZ239

3 ай бұрын

Google WS-20, high bypass and already in service, this video is a very superfactial take and out of date.

I am hearing the same for more than a decade that Chinese are copying the highly sensitive American defence hardware. Btw what are American defence companies doing to stop it? Any plans?

MIG31 was the inspiration of F15 Put them side by side and you see the copying shamelessly

@noobda4932

5 ай бұрын

Boeing never lost data to Chinese hackers 😂😂😂 espionage was never done whole Blackhawks is copied by china actually usa went in future by time machine and copied Chinese z20😂😂

Ain’t it amazing even though copy and perform better than the original one.

I prefer the KC-390. it's prettier

Chinese products is well advance versions of US.

@RogerSanGabriel

4 ай бұрын

lol

Looks like c-5m super Galaxy lol

going back to pre colonial times is a very weird way to justify modern day industrial espionage and intellectual property violations

@ironwolfF1

5 ай бұрын

IKR...that was a pretty impressive logic pretzel...the word 'develop' and certain PRC creations should be used _very_ sparingly.

@fernandoferreira-do8vh

5 ай бұрын

llora

@ex0duzz

5 ай бұрын

Intellectual property violations between superpower countries and armies don't exist. Every country does spying and espionage. Only weak countries cannot do what China does so they can only complain and cope. If you're strong you will defend your systems and technology from espionage. Otherwise you can only cry. That's the name of the game.

@prathamsingh4595

5 ай бұрын

I don't think that there will be anyone in a war looking at the IPR violations by a warring party either.

The zero was NEVER supperior to anything.

copy of C17 - thanks Antonov

@benwilson6145

5 ай бұрын

I didnt know Antonov designed the C17

@noobda4932

5 ай бұрын

​@@juhao356Chinese boys every where defending copycat china u better see there helicopter fleet of copied Blackhawks and European firms

Like most of its other weaponries, Y-20 LOOKs better than it is. Just look at its engine spec/performance and the the configuration of how the engines are mounted in related to the flaps ... let alone those interior / avionics we couldn't see... it looks like C-17 from distance but the capabilities are far behind comparing with C-17.

@jahidjesan2067

5 ай бұрын

capabiliies you say? mind if you mention them here?

@PopulismIsForBottomFeeders

16 күн бұрын

@@jahidjesan2067 Short version: Compared to the C-17, the is Y-20 is smaller, has a lower internal volume, carries 11t less over the same unrefuelled distance (Y-20 has no in-flight refuelling ability), cruising 200kph slower with a relatively limited short/rough field performance and a relatively poor 'hot and high' performance. China's build themselves an improved Il-76MD-90 with some asthetics of the C-17-- and there's nothing wrong with that, the Y-20/Il-76 are very useful aircraft, but they're not in the same class as the C-17. Comparing the Y-20 to the C-17 is like comparing a C-130J to the A400M.

Ukraine help China for this aircraft i think

@commie5211

5 ай бұрын

Soviet aircraft were designed in Russia and produced in ukraine. There were a lots of ukrainian engineers moved to China after the 2000s, however they were all from eastern ukraine, because thats where the military industrial complex were. It was the current ukrainian government ended all the collaborations.

Wellll, justifying copying aside, they could at least give us retroactive licensing fees. I’m holding my breath.

@WeaponDetective

5 ай бұрын

We are not justifying, it is just reality.

@anuvisraa5786

5 ай бұрын

Way should them is not like you give them the know-how and the us also copy a lot of tings.

nation of thieves,. good vid as usual though

@n0zferattu

5 ай бұрын

Did you mean West?

This 'it's a C-17 copy' garbage is amateurish. The Y-20 has the same rough size and dimensions as the Il-76MD-90, with only slight improvements to range and payload capacity. China built themselves a better Il-76MD with knowledge gleaned/hacked/acquired (whatever) from the C-17 and other US military programs. That is it. Comparing the Y-20 and C-17 as though they're near peers just because they share **some** visual characteristics is as dumb as 'WiCh iZ bEtTeR, F-14 oR f-22' arguments you see from War Thunder 'experts'. The Y-20 is **NOT** in the same class as larger C-17.