The fact that this was uploaded only yesterday proves that David Chalmers's hair exists outside of linear time, providing compelling evidence of the many worlds interpretation :) Go David!

@altortugas5979

3 жыл бұрын

😂 Yeah, wasn’t he shaved and haircut the episode before? I love this show.

@DavidAlvarado-js3qq

2 жыл бұрын

I'm going to infer that David Chalmers enjoys 4/20.

Dave Chalmers' physics goes up to eleven!

Consciousness can be explained without the need to resort to elaborate hypotheses. It is enough to observe with eyes wide open to find a coherent explanation of Consciousness and Being.

I love your channel. I enjoy all the talks and how you explore so many views. Maybe visit some elders in various indigenous cultures and ask them about your various topics on mind, consciousness and the concept of God.

@altortugas5979

3 жыл бұрын

I third this idea. It’s time to start exploring beyond the western sphere of thought.

@djgenetic111

3 жыл бұрын

Actually, I was just about to write that scientists might not be experts on consciousness. They mostly even argue that c is beyond science. My suggestion would be to speak with Buddhist monks, as they are training their consciousness for their whole life. Whenever I listen to them I get the feeling that they know much more about the world than any scientist. This is not against science, but if science to this day has no idea what c is, then it might not be within the realm of science.

Great show!!! Magnificent guests with all very valid but different perspectives..... Dr Kuhn really is at the forefront of neuroscience....

Who is exploring consciousness? It's the consciousness that explores. So, the question is cyclical. Consciousness cannot be explored with logic and constant thoughts that distract us from the very same consciousness. Silence is the best way to explore consciousness

Vedant says “ Cosmos appears from the ignorance of consciousness and disappears with the knowledge of consciousness just as a snake appears from the non cognition of the rope and disappears with its recognition.”

- I´ve met my fav rock star! - um, what, jesus? - well... basically, yes!

This is a great show

One of the best you tube channel 🙏🙏

One's personal consciousness is at the centre of the cosmos.

Paul Davies' last one is actually this lifes truth.

We are all blinking into and out of existence at who knows how fast on the quantum scale consciousness could be the soul/spirit

Without CONSCIOUSNESS nothing exists : COSMOS is experienced in Consciousness alone : YOU are always at the Center of this Infinite Cosmos of CONSCIOUSNESS without which nothing can exist , not even "NOTHING " !

Paradise is experienced in consciousness not the cosmos

I love these videos! 💖

Consciousness source is the soul which is the power supply and the operating genius system that gives us consciousness. It’s a great program from a great programmer

@soulsenses369

3 жыл бұрын

Well said!

@kandoundou23

3 жыл бұрын

You just inserted 'Soul' and 'a great programmer' in your definition of Consciousness. Can you provide proof of the existence of 'the soul' and of 'the great programmer'?

@gowdsake7103

3 жыл бұрын

Really you just inserted Soul for I dont know

@gowdsake7103

3 жыл бұрын

@@soulsenses369 In what way ? Please provide evidence for a soul

@mo2119

3 жыл бұрын

The soul doesn’t exist, there is only consciousness. There is only one “soul” in that sense. The Holy Spirit is just another word the totality of creation. Everyone actually has the same “soul”. The same spark of life. The source is our awareness. Our intent. And Our action. Our beliefs, ideas.

Chalmers looking like he plays bass in a Winger cover band.

The human imagination can take you anywhere. Proving what you imagine exists is a whole different game. If the multiverse is real. It opens a whole new bag of issues. One being an energy source that keeps pumping out that much energy forever. Next, what is the point ? And nothing ever happens without a prior event. So the big bang was probably not the beginning. The energy had too come from somewhere.

Paul is great

David Chalmers could not have been more wrong. I’m glad Mark Solms and Karl Friston gave him a piece of their minds.

WHAT forced all existence?

@gowdsake7103

3 жыл бұрын

Does it matter that we DONT KNOW YET

@Bassotronics

3 жыл бұрын

Consciousness forced existence which in turn forced consciousness to exist.

Your 2nd & 3rd possibility both are right. I totally agree with you.GOD is the supreme conciousness, a timeless being who never dies & we all are consious beings or we can say immortal souls. after bodily death our role changes & our conciousness begins with new role with a new body in this cosmic conscious play. GOD is the ultimate reality. GOD is the supreme, final, and fundamental power in all reality. GOD is the Final truth.

Quantum fluctuations need to happen in some kind of fields if there was no space then how quantum fluctuations could happen?

My Dreams are eerily similar to Einstein's theory of relativity, when I dream I always have all of my senses. If I need to get through a door that looks like it's a mile away, I somehow without even planning it out, just open the door right in front of me. Then after I go through that door I can run down thru a stairwell that looks infinite, and reach the ground 100 feet down by extending my leg, not even aware that I'm bending space & time in my dream to do so. In dreams we move like eternal beings move, we use time to our advantage and simply have control of all space and material matter. Death is real life, Biological life is a department of corrections for the eternal. We will never know the ultimate truth not in this existence.

Simple! You have to accept one brute fact or another... Either the universe was eternal in some form and everything arose from a simple background according to naturalistic processes; quantum instability, chemical fusion, biological evolution, etc.. Or an unexplained and highly complex creator God just decided to make it all happen. I know where I stand!

@GlossRabban

3 жыл бұрын

On your feet?

Fun fact: the interview with David Chalmers was recorded immediately after he was rescued from a remote desert island after being stranded there for nearly 2 years.

@jeremymr

3 жыл бұрын

@Andreaz-64 HA yes!

Particles are "non-spacial". They are assumed to have zero volume, aren't they?

Any chance of changing out the opening music to your videos ?

@Bassotronics

3 жыл бұрын

*Rich Murray* Why?

@richmurray3957

3 жыл бұрын

@@Bassotronics too high pitch like classical just a piece thats lower in tone something that matches his voice

@Bassotronics

3 жыл бұрын

@ *Rich Murray* Now that I analyze it, I can understand what you mean. It’s too “squeaky”. A lower pitch and more mysterious one would be better.

@godq3

3 жыл бұрын

You have to mute it quickly.

Creation - Internal - Prime Numbers, Evolution - External - Fibonacci Sequence

I do not exist unless I observe myself.

No matter how intelligent a seacreature is, it can only speculate the " out of water" experience, and even if the intuition is compelling, the actual experiences can only confirm " sea world". " We" as a group consciousness are in a parallel plane (4d materialism), are observing " from" consciousness, not at it. This is what enlightened teachers have been saying (timelss wisdom) for eons....such individuals have transcended this group level. As Pythagoras stated " If you wjsh to know the universe, know thyself". Ever since, reductionism has ruled, which now could well be called ridiculousism lol

@bloodymirpoutin3825

3 жыл бұрын

Lol

Let's assume consciousness is fundamental then we need a clear description of what consciousness is. Could hit exist outside of time and space? Is it one thing? Are we a part of it or are we it or maybe just you?

Numbers are icons for quantity: math is the natural science of quantity. ... Fundamentally.

Oh, you should have just met Sadhguru.

Because we can?

If Consciousness collapses a probability wave into a particle, does that mean that Consciousness is required for particles to exist?

Our hearts are like stars called the sun/son. Light and warmth that makes life grow and creates free, clean energy called joy. Opposite of the heart is a giant black hole in space called "ego" which is filled with "greed" and it's ignorance (hate). Darkness (business) exists so that stars like US have a place to shine in heaven (joy, beauty and harmony). Stars like US don't exist to be sucked out of heaven by a giant black hole in space called "greed" and it's ignorance (hate).

@jeanavo3865

Жыл бұрын

I love you brother

It’s amazing how you always ask such good questions. ❤️🙏🏻 Why does everyone think mathematics alone is the answer? The litmus? It just isn’t. It’s a powerful tool. Brin hits it with the “pre-programmed” and we’re supposed to do this… Again. I actually can answer these things. Because I know what gravity is. How the natural laws are the way they are. I think Copernicus wanted to publish post/humously not out of fear but because he had all these people staring him in the face who built lives on erroneous views. It’s like smashing a kids sand castle… I get it. I love children. ❤️‍🔥 But in my case, I understand that if the kids are going to survive, they need to build bigger, better, correct sand-castles. ❤️🦄 Thus the smashing. Many of these people you interview feel like family to me. Thank you. 🙏🏻❤️‍🔥

The answer has already been found-it’s 42

@Ascendlocal

3 жыл бұрын

Jackie Robinson? WTF??

consciousness is u prove the god... If u can have consciousness it self? So why not out there, have consciousness it's self...

Consciousness is to perceive, talk about and act on free will. Consciousness is free will manifested in physical nature of cosmos.

@GlossRabban

3 жыл бұрын

But what if free will is an illusion?

@jamesruscheinski8602

3 жыл бұрын

@@GlossRabban free will not seen or pictured, yet sensed / perceived and experienced. There is something there, which has been named free will.

In other words, when in doubt of your existence, ask a metal head. For reals. All heil Motorhead! All heil Lemmy, the one true God!!!

whoa his hair hahaha

Why explore your neighborhood?

Multiverse? Universe gave us conscience? Lol wow god gave us consciousness.

Two conceptions, here avoided, would greatly ameliorate this discussion: Placing consciousness (at its fullest) toward the ends of evolution, and seeing reality as a qualitative balance between the laws of reductionist physics and noetic ideals drawing out evolution. Evolutionary selection begins, primitively, with the collapse of the wave function.

These ideas are nothing new with the Rosicrucians😂

I'm getting closer to existential crisis lol... Stoping making such videos...!☺️

Trying to use the common sense tools of this world to look back to the quantum world where there is no space, time or position. Makes sense that this world of space time position emerges from something that isn't. The problem is over applying the common sense tools yields all of the wacky theories. These are category errors when you lack the real categorical skill of analyzing the brain. Especially when you fail to read the evolutionary clues yielded by science.

Laws, God, consciouness- no. Consciouness is God.

@Mooseouma

3 жыл бұрын

@Andreaz-64 Me, because i believe

@Mooseouma

3 жыл бұрын

@Andreaz-64 Like which things, something out of nothing?!

@Mooseouma

3 жыл бұрын

@Andreaz-64 Well, i'm a believer but not your ordinary believer. I only follow what makes sense whether in Sciences or in Religion. My general belief is that only spiritual/ supernatural/ immaterial/ mind exists, whereas the natural/ physical are a perception of the mind. This puts me at odds with majority of the Sciences though. But when you say there's no reason to believe in supernatural, i see biasness. Q. Is darkness natural/ real or is it supernatural?

My brain hurts

The idea that we will be conscious after death is the extreme form of optimism. Every night I lose my consciousness, just by falling asleep. I don't see how a dead brain can be conscious

@Mahdiyahya21

11 ай бұрын

Then how do you know that you lost consciousness .u know that.therefore consciousness was there but aware of nothing. Another example of you unconscious how then would you wake up if someone wake you up ur not dead.

@tedgrant2

11 ай бұрын

@@Mahdiyahya21 Because from the time I fall asleep to the time I wake up there is a gap in my knowledge of being aware of my existence. We call that "sleep". I imagine that being dead is exactly the same, but with no dreams.

Why 'choose' among them when you can experience the 3rd option of "Spirit" as the origin / generator of our reality AND your own conscious perspective in it? The experience of it shows it to be true. How? Psychedelics, meditation, near death experience, intense prayer / fasting, sensory deprivation - you know - the normal methods mystics have been proposing for eons.

@ferdinandkraft857

3 жыл бұрын

What if all these methods are creating an illusion?

@brentonbrenton9964

3 жыл бұрын

@@ferdinandkraft857 When you wake from a dream, there is a feeling associated with it - a feeling that accompanies the comparison between the 'dream' and 'consensus reality'. It is that feeling that lets you know which is real and which is dream. That's how you 'know' you aren't dreaming anymore. Altered states of consciousness have that feeling as well, except they feel 'more real' than consensus reality, and consensus reality is shown to be a dream / illusion in comparison. They are also accompanied by a 'remembering' of these states. It isn't some completely foreign thing, it is a state that has been forgotten, a feeling of returning home. They are a surprise for the ego (the thing that currently defines your life) since this ego has never experienced it - but there is a deeper part of you that knows it, remembers it, and recognizes it instantly as truth. Besides, the only way we know reality is through our conscious experience. Altered states are a part of that and (if we are to have an accurate understanding of reality) need to be accounted for. Unfortunately, given their nature, I can't have an experience for you any more than I can hear for you or think your thoughts for you.

@ferdinandkraft857

3 жыл бұрын

@@brentonbrenton9964 I'd love to have one of these experiences, but I'm afraid I would dismiss them afterwards as some sort of hallucination.

@brentonbrenton9964

3 жыл бұрын

@@ferdinandkraft857 Fair enough. Our dismissal of 'hallucination' as something 'not real' is a product of our scientific materialist culture. This actually causes a lot of suffering for people who DO experience 'hallucinations', because the rest of society tells them 'they aren't real' and 'as a result, you're broken'. Psychedelics turn that on its head. Instead of slicing up our conscious experience into categories of 'real' and 'not real', the message is 'all you are is conscious experience, so whatever you are experiencing is real'. From that position, we have 'consensus reality' (where you and I interact in an objectively verifiable way), and we have other equally real but 100% subjective experiences as well - thoughts, emotions, pains, dreams, hallucinations, insights, qualia, etc. The division between what is 'real' and what is not is a useful convention, but ultimately not grounded in truth. If you are courageous, find someone underground to guide you. If you are less courageous, go overseas for ayahuasca. If you are patient, just wait - these substances will be legal soon for therapy (mdma and psilocybin in particular). I do recommend everyone have an ego death experience. It is life changing, similar to having a baby or getting married. Approach with reverence and caution, with an attitude of surrender.

What Sanatan Vedic Dharma ( Not Hinduism ) claims that jiva ( soul of semi concious beings), Ishwara ( god or super concious being ) and prakriti ( basic matter ) are eternal stuffs. No beginning, no end. whats the origin ? they are not sure about the origin.

The question of consciousness doesn't belong in physics, because physicists can't do meaningful experiments to study human consciousness and understand it. The study of human consciousness belongs in biology and computer science. Because computer neural networks can now simulate parts of the brain. Biological understanding of the human brain can now be simulated and tested in computers. But physics can only talk about consciousness in non-scientific, untestable, and unfalsifiable ways. Which is an embarrassment for the science of physics, rather than a contribution to the study of consciousness. That's why most physicists need to talk about it in private. They embarrass themselves and their science, when they talk about it in public.

tacky ...

my 5c = everyone is wrong ... to think you're scientifically right requires faith i.e. 95% = dark (matter + energy) ... whether you're science or religion = faith

@ferdinandkraft857

3 жыл бұрын

Science doesn't require faith.

@gmc7298

3 жыл бұрын

​@@ferdinandkraft857 95% of the universal laws/matter is unknown. science is 'certain' wrt what happened during the first few milliseconds after the big bang. this 'certainty' is based on 20 years snapshot monitoring (perhaps 50 years) ... out of 14 billion. how is this not faith?

@ferdinandkraft857

3 жыл бұрын

@@gmc7298 Science is not "certain" of anything. All its models are subject to change in response of new evidence or better models.

@gmc7298

3 жыл бұрын

​@@ferdinandkraft857 science makes statements of certainty based on current knowledge vs technology etc. my point is everyone is wrong about the 'great belief'

So the other Day, when I went for a walk. I tipped over a large rock, and under it was two smaller Rocks. Did that rock just have children 🤪

Some interesting content, but does not address the following. People who have had NDE's see clear details of say an operating theatre or motor crash scene, when not conscious and even clinically dead and can relate these after recovery, when according to normal brain centric laws, that should not be possible. Also such people relate very similar accounts of the afterlife. There are also people that claim to be re-incarnated with strong memories of their previous lives, subsequently confirmed by written records, or from eyewitness accounts of living people. As regards the other arguments raised in the interview, multiverses etc should be ruled out. It is just a regurgitation of the Steady State theory v Creation. Even Fred Hoyle, who was the most ardent supporter of Steady State theory admitted he was wrong and that it looked like the universe had been created ex nihilo. The whole point about the Creator is that he does not exist within Space Time, otherwise sudden creation ex nihilo is not possible. We cannot even ask the question what existed before Big Bang, since time itself(both arrows) only commenced then. G-d himself hints to this in the Torah(old testament), when he says "The secret things are for me" This includes pre-creation.

I don't like your definition of consciousness (should be a biological origin of sensory input, likely electrical or electromagneic radiation of the CNS). And you need to study GUTCP. Forget MQM.