Looks like Napoleon's empire post-Russia was...Blownaparte

@wtfwtf2956

4 жыл бұрын

Underrated

@pimpinmagicianofprophecy

4 жыл бұрын

10/10 burn

@rzul

4 жыл бұрын

@@wtfwtf2956 stop with this, "underrated" is not equal to "good joke", not every joke has to be the most liked one

@kaiserwilhelmll.3634

4 жыл бұрын

@@rzul Stop being a jerk. Or the Kaiserliche Garde is going to get ya!

@bbernie

4 жыл бұрын

I'm screaming

History fans: Why would Napoleon invade Russia? Napoleon, who steamrolled all the continental powers of Europe: Why would I not?

@EndOfSmallSanctuary97

3 жыл бұрын

Yep. If I remember correctly, when someone in his court warned him that the Russians were a serious challenge, Napoleon dismissed it because he'd decisively beaten them only five years earlier and didn't see how they could have changed much since then. Fairly reasonable assumption, considering that progress in Tsarist Russia moved at a snail's pace.

@looinrims

3 жыл бұрын

Including Russia*

@plusxz821

2 жыл бұрын

Because russians fight like mongols, not like any western nation

@MWENDA-vv5im

2 жыл бұрын

@@looinrims Not really. Napoleon had beaten Russia in a small battle, not a war. The battle also took place miles away from Russia. This is not the case for most of Europe that was effectively under the direct or indirect control of France.

@archivesoffantasy5560

2 жыл бұрын

@@MWENDA-vv5im “not a war” He literally beat them in the war of the third coalition and the war of the fourth coalition

"DoNt InVadE RUssiA iN thE WinTeR" Napoleon and Hitler who invaded in June: "My goodness what an idea, why didn't I think of that"

@givemethen-pass6182

4 жыл бұрын

Russia/USSR=Ah shit, here we go AGAIN

@anthonyc4138

4 жыл бұрын

@@givemethen-pass6182Lol

@ambasrb

4 жыл бұрын

Or just dont invade Russia ever 😁

@user-xw5xo3bv1n

4 жыл бұрын

@@alexander-mauricemillamlae4567 in case of Napoleon... well, you do know that last soldiers of his army left russian borders in december, first month of the winter after retreating during most weeks of autumn, right?)

@7macfly2

4 жыл бұрын

What most people dont know is that russian winter didnt beat Napoleon. Typhus did

"He thought he was going to win." Well, that explains a lot.

@superrknight1858

3 жыл бұрын

Tell's you all you need to know

@vdmur7952

3 жыл бұрын

haha

@garymussell6543

3 жыл бұрын

Echoed 180years later in Afghanistan by first Russia and then the US.

@Thyme2sea

Жыл бұрын

Just like a certain putin…

@The_whales

9 ай бұрын

The Russio-Ukraine war: hello there

tfw Napoleon invaded in June yet everyone thinks he invaded in the winter

@sonoftheway3528

4 жыл бұрын

people don't realize how long invasions take. or that its less about the winter and more about the Russian's ability to endlessly retreat due to their country being huge.

@grayishcolors

4 жыл бұрын

ITeach You sometimes retreat can be a really good war tactic

@sonoftheway3528

4 жыл бұрын

true, point is there were a lot of factors. not just the winter

@kaizermierkrazy6886

4 жыл бұрын

Well to be fair in Australia winter is June to August. Maybe out boi was fan

@ivanvoronov3871

4 жыл бұрын

@@sonoftheway3528 people always ignore the Russian military. That was the main factor. The battle of boradino was the single bloodiest day in all of the napoleonic war. It was a tactical draw and strategic defeat as it crippled napoleon's army. The winter just helped

“Quick and easy victory over Russia” File under “ideas that never ever work”

@Alex-lf5sh

4 жыл бұрын

*Mongols, Poles and Japanese want to know your location*

@agustinl2302

4 жыл бұрын

@@Alex-lf5sh Plus the Germans in the first World War.

@rayzas4885

4 жыл бұрын

Napoleon did it like 3 times before

@nicholasiiofrussia1662

4 жыл бұрын

@@agustinl2302 Russia in WW1 was never defeated. It was destroyed from inside. Treaty of Brest-Litovsk was signed after October Revolution and by that time, Russia was already dead. Bolsheviks weren't Russians, they were Jews

@biliminsrlar5752

4 жыл бұрын

@@nicholasiiofrussia1662 Germans caused the Bolsheviks revolution by sending Lenin back to Russia.

Napoleon: **takes Moscow** "I won, right? Right?...." **Slavic hardbass gets louder in the distance....**

@alexrowe7063

4 жыл бұрын

little did he know that the boss had a second phase.

@CBielski87

4 жыл бұрын

and that's when he knew, he fucked up

@Admiral45-10

3 жыл бұрын

Poles who took Moscow without a single shot in 1614: *Oh c'mon!*

@kostam.1113

3 жыл бұрын

Also Moscow was not the Russian capital at that time

@Reroume

3 жыл бұрын

@Bangbabangbabangbang "Oh non, les vilains Russes brûlent leurs ressources à la place de laisser à notre armée quelque chose pour se loger et se nourrir! C'est pas juste!" -Napoléon, en grelottant comme un gamin Ceux qui s'affirment supérieurs sont toujours inférieurs, c'est un classique. En 2021 ce sera le tour aux Américains d'échouer lamentablement dans l'atteinte d'un règne hégémonique.

"The second issue was Poland". They just can't catch a break

@cynicat74

2 жыл бұрын

Poland: Germany: Fuck you, Poland Russia: Fuck you, Poland

@SilverFang2789

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah well look where they are geographically. Caught in the middle of two historically military giants. If WW2 doesn't show you just how bad the Poles have had in dealing with Russia and Germany, then I don't know what will.

@obiwanfx

2 жыл бұрын

then what do we Belgians have to say? We have been like every great nation's boxing ring troughout history

@michaelbayer5094

2 жыл бұрын

Except Napoleon was putting Poland back on the map as a buffer state to Russia and counterweight to Austria and Prussia. That was smart. Invading Russia, not so. He should have kept building on Poland, and enticing the subject peoples inside Russia to rebel. Russia would need to commit forces in the west rather than retreat east when attacked. For all his brilliance he could not see this. Also, blockade Russia with Sweden help should have been arranged. Make Britain come to you.

@wojtekkkk

2 жыл бұрын

@@SilverFang2789 Those two weren't military giants until about 1700.

"History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." - Mark Twain

@adhprakash

2 жыл бұрын

905 likes without a reply? Wow

@donpollock9126

2 жыл бұрын

@@adhprakash this comment is proof of the bystander effect

@shafqatishan437

2 жыл бұрын

@@adhprakash y did u comment?

@kurzackd

2 жыл бұрын

I honestly don't get it...

@gnaskar

2 жыл бұрын

Wait, 2 years ago? What were you talking about? The war only started in February.

Silly Napoleon, not paying attention to the high attrition and low supply limit of the Russian provinces. Like a pro, Russia took defensive ideas and simply waited for France's war exhaustion to keep increasing.

@tomaspaulauskas2204

4 жыл бұрын

this is some advanced EU4 stuff

@USSAnimeNCC-

4 жыл бұрын

And destroyed everything as they retreated leaving them nothing useful

@Obrazoval

4 жыл бұрын

Hi to my EU4 brothers!

@ilayohana3150

4 жыл бұрын

*PARADOX INTENSIFIES*

@kurniaerfan7307

4 жыл бұрын

Pro Russian Player take quantity More meat for meat grinder!

"-in hopes of a quick and easy victory." "-thought that the Russians were an inferior people that could not withstand his armies." "-destroy Russia as an enemy to focus on starving out Britain-" Hmm, where have we heard this before I wonder.

@arnold3768

4 жыл бұрын

Hitler lived after Napoleon...

@jmaitland5709

4 жыл бұрын

@Arnold But didn't learn from Napoleon's mistakes, which was my point.

@fulcrum2951

4 жыл бұрын

Sweden

@prion42

4 жыл бұрын

"wanted to starve Britain" . . . Didn't they have a huge ass empire at the time?

@XD-bx6ee

4 жыл бұрын

@@prion42 to starve BRITAIN, not the BRITISH EMPIRE, think twice before you comment next time

Love how in Napoleons ideal Europe the English isles just don’t exist

@Mm-bp3zz

4 жыл бұрын

*british isles

@elliotunderhill3617

4 жыл бұрын

Lots of people’s ideal Europe tbh

@ninoy4914

4 жыл бұрын

Even the British....

@jamesmacdonald1116

4 жыл бұрын

Even without naponleons ideal Europe the English isles don't exist

@ronancunningham1705

4 жыл бұрын

he aint wrong

Hey Napoleon, why are you invading Russia? Napoleon: “Be Cossack can.”

@noobmaster-wg4no

2 жыл бұрын

😂😂😂

From what I’ve read, Napoleon knew the risks of invading Russia and tried to prepare for it (studying the Great Northern War, planning to make winter quarters early, etc) it’s just that he kept being lured in by the Russians, he felt he couldn’t rightly stop advancing until he had his decisive battle.

@marlonmoncrieffe0728

4 жыл бұрын

Yeah, the Russians were clever by drawing him further and further in and also employing a scorched earth campaign. They sacrificed a many pawns, knights, rooks, and even the queen in Moscow to destroy the opponent king.

@Septimus_ii

Жыл бұрын

@@marlonmoncrieffe0728 Turned Napoleon's strength into his weakness. Napoleon could never resist an opportunity to outmanouvre his enemy

@carterbentonjr399

Жыл бұрын

The one thing Napoleon for got about the Great Northern Wars was that Charles the madman of the North had a chance to finish off Peter I/the Great but decided to let him off. B I G - M I S T A K E.

Napoleon: I got Moscow Alexander: ok Napoleon: so you gonna surrender? Alexander: no

@alanpennie8013

4 жыл бұрын

Alexander fingers a box of matches; "Hey Napoleon you look after the holy city, it's very prone to fires in summer."

@youtubetroller2451

3 жыл бұрын

@@alanpennie8013 lmao

@Adrian_Martinez1261

2 жыл бұрын

Winter: 👁👄👁

@kylenetherwood8734

2 жыл бұрын

Better than that, he didn't reply

@rome316ae3

2 жыл бұрын

Wait Alexander is from greece right and he died since bc

Out of 500k soldiers only 130k or so reached Borodino. Most of the French army died or deserted due to the long marches in Summer, not in Winter. That is what people miss. When winter came the war was already lost. Also the strategy of Russia of avoiding a needless fight until the enemy was exhausted was brilliant. Napoleon never had a chance against the Russians in such a long territory.

@ShubhamMishrabro

2 жыл бұрын

Russia did this against Germany too

@orkellSigvaldason

2 жыл бұрын

To be fair some of those that didn't reach Borodino were left behind as detachments at vital points along the way.

@user-ve3hs5hq5i

2 жыл бұрын

IMHO, a significant part of those who did not reach Borodino were in garrisons, supported the supply system, and so on.

@IsraelCountryCube

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-ve3hs5hq5i ah so you want to kill more french i see? baguette? oh wait no i meant vodka?

@akdele5

Жыл бұрын

@@IsraelCountryCube you high or something?

"Our armies will cover moscow" "We will fight in Siberia."

@SFFRN19

4 жыл бұрын

Motivation:100 Badass:100

@alexgainsborough4921

4 жыл бұрын

JonatasAdoM No, Tsar Alexander said: “If necessary, I will at least be the emperor of Kamchatka, but I will not surrender”.

@sanher20

4 жыл бұрын

See you in Petropavlovsk

@malvarez8484

4 жыл бұрын

JonatasAdoM it certainly does an old empire making a final last stand Spain = Britain a new strong dominant power entering a goleden age coming out of the conflict USA = Britain .all While Russia playing a pivotal role in both conflicts. All propagated by a mad man Hitler = Napoleon. It’s almost the exact same really

@user-uq3um5nq7d

4 жыл бұрын

@@alexgainsborough4921 that's a lot of determination there

“Let’s invade Russia” -Someone who could not invade Russia

@Lipidwave

3 жыл бұрын

@@insulam821 Cough Cough Poland aswell

@insulam821

3 жыл бұрын

Sebastian Szeliga oh yeah they did as well

@Admiral45-10

3 жыл бұрын

Jeremi Wiśniewski said so in 1614. He smashed entire Russian and Swedish forces after one battle (at Kłuszyn, not Moscow), and he took the capital without a single shot. The same thing said the Stephen Batory - he defeated Russia three times a row (when it was ruled by Ivan the Dangerous)

@sheevrealname2365

3 жыл бұрын

@@Lipidwave But the Poles didn't win the Polish-Muscovite War, they were driven out and only took some border provinces which they lost in like 50 years anyways. That's not a successful invasion

@DK-tv6rk

3 жыл бұрын

Never forget the Brest-Litovsk!

“Never invade Russia from the west.” -Genghis Khan

@affentaktik2810

4 жыл бұрын

Duran he has absolutely never said something like this in his entire life

@ziomeke5580

4 жыл бұрын

Affentaktik “After I die people will start to quote things I didn’t say” - Genghis Khan

@00Trademark00

4 жыл бұрын

@@affentaktik2810 "Don't believe everything you read on the internet" - Genghis Khan

@kreuzritter4898

4 жыл бұрын

@@affentaktik2810 "Too many whamen" - Genghis Khan

@bigguacamole6921

4 жыл бұрын

@@affentaktik2810 "lmao XD" - Genghis Khan

"It wanted a meritocratic Europe..." - Britain (and Ireland) just disappears. I laughed SO loud :D

@sausagejockyGaming

4 жыл бұрын

the reference of britain leaving wasnt because of a lack of meritocratic society it was it wanted europe under french dominance and they knew Britain would never be under french control hence not part of their europe.

@jacquescro-magnon1440

3 жыл бұрын

This was really funny

@sausagejockyGaming

3 жыл бұрын

cumquatrct3 the monarchy hasn’t had real power for hundreds of years, their existence doesn’t affect the UK’s government at all.

@cgt3704

3 жыл бұрын

And the Balkans are not included. Why are everyone so mean to us 😥

@pecadodeorgullo5963

3 жыл бұрын

@@sausagejockyGaming it can though.

Napoleon: Brace yourselves, winter is coming Russia: The cold doesn’t bother me anyway

@lidulkadut

4 жыл бұрын

Most of the names of the characters in Frozen are Russian

@franciscomm7675

4 жыл бұрын

@@lidulkadut really? I though they were scandinavian

@Minirush35

4 жыл бұрын

It did in the Winter War

@davidhouseman4328

4 жыл бұрын

The cold really does bother the Russians. Russian military losses in these victories are massive never mind the civilians one due to scorched earth policies.

@siechamontillado

4 жыл бұрын

LET IT SNOW, LET IT SNOOOOOW! LET THE HUNGER FLOW!!

0:50 Britain "I don't feel so good..."

@sammenton2219

4 жыл бұрын

Its just disappeared

@ms.yawhaw8831

3 жыл бұрын

Just have mistaken animation lel

@reverendnon5959

3 жыл бұрын

but if you close your eyes...

@lightningfletch5598

3 жыл бұрын

It’s not a mistake. It’s Napoleon’s wet dream.

@someoneintheway6694

2 жыл бұрын

@@lightningfletch5598 you made my day😂

"Because... he thought he was going to win" I LOVE IT!!!

Another reason was that wars back then usually weren't won by one country occupying the other. Take Napoleon's wars with Austria and Prussia for example (all of which were declared by Austria and Prussia, btw): the wars were won by Napoleon defeating his enemies army in the field close enough to the enemy capital that they would not have time to muster a new army to defend it. Thus they capitulated and gave concessions. Napoleon invaded Russia thinking that Russia would fight a war in this way and such a type of war he had every reason to be confident of winning. Russia, however, decided rather intelligently that there is no reason to follow unwritten rules and conventions which does not favour them. In hindsight we know how the Russians fought and how much they were willing to sacrifice, but it was not unreasonable at the time to expect Russia to meet Napoleon in the field and to accept Napoleon's terms after being defeated and/or having their capitals threatened. It wasn't like Napoleon was trying to annex Russia.

@KingJohnMichael

Жыл бұрын

Russia and not following international rules Iconic duo

No one invades Russia in winter and wins. Except of course, the Mongols.

@0renforge424

4 жыл бұрын

OctagonDinosaur *Crash Course World History Intensifies*

@USSAnimeNCC-

4 жыл бұрын

Mongols: we are the exception

@Puckosar

4 жыл бұрын

Pretty sure napoleons invasion didn't start in the winter

@Salty-Doggy

4 жыл бұрын

They didn't invade in the winter Russia is just very big and it takes a long time to march through they actually got to Moscow before winter then waited for Russia to surrender they did not winter came early and Napoleon was short on supplies because the Russians adopted scorched earth tactics

@Solaxe

4 жыл бұрын

And Poles.. and Lithuanians... and to some extent even Vikings...

Note that Napoleon wasn't originally trying to conquer Russia. He was hoping that a show of force at the border would cause the Russians to give in and accept the Continental System, and he had no plans for going east of Smolensk. But the shows of force kept escalating until Moscow was burned to the ground and the harsh winter destroyed the French army.

@samarkand1585

4 жыл бұрын

Important to point out that Moscow was burnt down by Russians though

@user-ic5xr1fu4j

4 жыл бұрын

Moscow then was not the capital, so its burning almost did not harm Russia itself. But Napoleon's army of 600 thousand soldiers died very stupid.

@raitiC1

4 жыл бұрын

​@@user-ic5xr1fu4j You realize that most of those soldiers were Russians who willingly joined Napoleone's army because they were sick of living under the serfdom!!?

@user-ic5xr1fu4j

4 жыл бұрын

@@raitiC1 You're funny. Napoleon entered Russia with 650.000 army, and left Russia with 12.000-16.000 army. If Russians had taken Napoleon's side, he would have won, no? Problem with logic?

@raitiC1

4 жыл бұрын

@@user-ic5xr1fu4j First of all Russians were not the only ethnicity that was part of Russian empire! You realize that right!? And yes many Russians took Napoleon's side! And the biggest resistor to Napoleon in Russia was GERMAN landlords that literary OWNED Russians as slaves! Btw those numbers you got are taken out of...

You do a good job on making these Short history videos, there's time I want them longer but you know what keep making them short for the most part they're easy to digest.

I love the ending explanation. It's so simple, yet so true.

0:51 like how the UK just disappears

Napoleon: tries invading Russia and fails 🇩🇪: *laughs in imperial german*

@Hugo-cn9no

3 жыл бұрын

At least we french took moscow germans no

@eisenkoenig8324

3 жыл бұрын

@@Hugo-cn9no they literally abandoned the city, set fire and took the food with them. It was a trap

@igorpaosz7508

3 жыл бұрын

Well, the only country able to take and hold Moscow was Poland-Lithuania it seems

@johnustube2047

3 жыл бұрын

@@eisenkoenig8324 France: runs into spear trap (Moscow) Also France: “We did it guys, mission was a success!”

@kirillassasin

3 жыл бұрын

Igor XDDD “Yeah we defeat Russia for 2 years” Poland disappears for 123 years

I really enjoy your videos , they are funny and educational in the same time.

Great video! You're a great inspiration for my new channel, so it's always great to see another video from you! Great video once again! 😊😊

map correction needed @ 0:16: Russia (dark green) conquered Finland in 1809, in 1799 it was still a part of Sweden (light blue).

Great job on the video!! You should do some stuff that's a little more modern as well.

Napoleon: "Our forces are tied up in the West. Let's open up another front in Russia!" Hitler: "Great idea!"

Another main reason why I watch & fathomly enjoy this channel, besides historic facts, are the characters & their signs & expressions. Makes me laugh, I ❤️ it

That remake of Napoleon Crossing the Alps during the patreon mentions is just stellar.

Napoleon had some reason to think he'd come out on top; he had not only been been mostly undefeated up to that point, but also Russia had never used their self-destructive tactic to that titanic scale before. *Nobody* could have expected exactly what happened; Russia basically impaled itself and then metaphorically used its own blood to poison the French army. Mr. Moustache had no such excuse; not only was he mostly unproven of being capable of holding his own in a real battle (unless you count unprovoked invasions against countries who couldn't fight back as "a real battle"), but now there was a well-known precedent for the tactic that someone more competent would've taken notice of.

@cattysplat

9 ай бұрын

The Eastern front in WW2 was a whole another level of sacrifice and slaughter, it made the western front look like a fun holiday compared for number of deaths. I doubt moustache man would have thought the USSR were willing to throw so many lives to holt the advance and prevent Stalingrad's fall, likely expected a peace pact or surrender. But they kept coming...

Amazing content! really well presented

Napoleon failed invasion of Russia: *_exists_* Hitler: u know what would be a good idea *Soviets sieze Berlin 3 years later*

@CataciousAmogusevic

4 жыл бұрын

*4

@Durovnax

4 жыл бұрын

4*

@axelandersson6314

4 жыл бұрын

I mean, it worked in WW1 when they started fighting themselves as opposed to the Germans.

@pimpinmagicianofprophecy

4 жыл бұрын

@@axelandersson6314 *when germany supported the bolshevik revoulution. Only 2nd nation to successfuly invade russia.

@sirkevinvonlp

4 жыл бұрын

@Ionasku Alexander I See a man of culture

You should totally do a video on the peninsular war!

Love your series here

I love your channel keep up the great stuff

Please make videos about this Why did Mongols lose in Vietnam, the border of Africa & middle east, Japan, and Nusantara? Why did Japan lose in Imjin war? Why did Nayirah lie? Why did Pinoys lose against USA? Why do Poles still demand reparations from Germany for 1939?

@aryaankhan3725

4 жыл бұрын

Evan Pangaribuan his ships got drowned when sailing for japan twice

@siechamontillado

4 жыл бұрын

Why can I not believe it's not butter!?

@ThePiotrekpecet

4 жыл бұрын

Poles don't want reparations we've got silesia and pomerania and warmia as reparations only our retarded govemment does

@AftermathRV

4 жыл бұрын

​@@ThePiotrekpecet Inb4 Storm Prussia, the poles cant stop all of us, god with us.

@pawemarsza9515

4 жыл бұрын

I can explain you about reparations. There are 2 main reasons: 1) Poland in 1944/45 was not liberated but conquered by USSR, and Stalin made my country a puppet state. As such, Poland agreed that we will receive reparations from soviet occupation zone of Germany. But we never received that. USSR started to steal our coal in huge amount, so our rulers made a deal: you stop stealing our coal and we forget about reparations. All this decisions were made while Soviets occupied Poland, so now some people think we should be given something by Germany 2) more important reason: that is bulshit invented by our ruling party, PiS, to show their voters that they "fight for polish strong position" abroad

"In the Year 8, or 1799 as it's normally known" killed me

@alanpennie8013

3 жыл бұрын

Laughs in Revolutionary Calendar.

@alanmaclaren4366

2 жыл бұрын

The United States gained its independence on year 5 according to the revolutionary calendar.

Love your content man! But when are you going to make a 10 minute history video again?

I just finished epic history’s series on the napoleonic wars and this short is bluuudy fantastic!!

napoleon: ok watch out, it’s winter russia, *HA YOU FOOL*

@user-zw2ee2sp7d

3 жыл бұрын

In June?

2:21 "Napoleon was convinced of his own genius and considered the russians to be an inferior people who would be unable to withstand his armies for very long" History really does repeat itself as 129 years later, Hitler did exactly the same thing

@reitairue2073

2 жыл бұрын

Now, hilariously, Russia did the same in Ukraine.

@isko9201

2 жыл бұрын

@@reitairue2073 your western propaganda who lies 24/7 is doing the same thing

@reitairue2073

2 жыл бұрын

@@isko9201 Oh I know, I have come to the understanding that the truth I know is just one of many. All I can do is try to survive in it, don't take me too serious on here lmao.

@strider8662

Жыл бұрын

Hitler got extremely closer to win funnily enough, despite not being as good of a military mind as hım.

@manojpandey7895

8 ай бұрын

@@reitairue2073 Russia always seems weak, like in the Finnish war of 1930s, and port Arthur. but they always manage to come out on top when there is a huge threat.

I always enjoy these videos every time I see them in my subscriptions

everyone: teams up to fight russia russia: anyways, see you in paris

@watching99134

2 жыл бұрын

Russia only reached Paris as part of a team.

1:37 " As such, the Russians could not tolerate the idea of an independant Poland." This sentence literally summarises all of Russia's European conflicts in a nutshell.

@user-wx4nv8xr3d

2 жыл бұрын

Nah

@watching99134

2 жыл бұрын

Right now it seems to revolve much more around Ukraine.

@mrvk39

Жыл бұрын

@@watching99134 there wouldn't even be Ukraine if Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth didn't capture that part of Rus which is now known as Ukraine and Belarus. So, Poland plays a central role in Russian history and vice versa.

Napoleon invades Russia. Russia: I'm going to do what's known as a pro gamer move.

Are you ever going to start doing the 10 minute videos again? Just wondering, still loving the content!

@yarpen26

4 жыл бұрын

He won't, trust me.

Great content!

Sweden had finland 1799. In the first map it is displayed that russia controlled it during that time which is incorrect.

@paulpaulson7551

4 жыл бұрын

Yes, Finland was liberated, and founded as a special state with many rights in Russian Empire only in 1809

@NickWestin

4 жыл бұрын

Paul Paulson wtf ur crazy. What do you mean liberated? They were forcibly annexed against their will.

@paulpaulson7551

4 жыл бұрын

@@NickWestin , Because I know history! Because they got a statehood they didn't have in the Swedish Reich. The Grand Duchy of Finland, with its own Parliament, currency, Constitution, army, separated from the rest of the Russian Empire by the state border, had an economy and taxes only for the internal needs of Finland. Emperor Alexander I liberated Finland, and Alexander II gave it even more rights and freedoms: for this, the Finns erected a monument to him in Helsinki

@NickWestin

4 жыл бұрын

Paul Paulson what you dont understand is that before the russian takeover there was no finnish identity. Therefore they had no need for such autonomy as part of sweden which they had been for a really long time. So ur crazy to say that the finnish people back then welcomed the russians (which they absolutely did not). The finns might have had a different language but their identity was as swedish as it could be.

@cynicat74

3 жыл бұрын

@@NickWestin Nobody said the Finns welcomed the Russians. He said Finland had more rights under Russia, than they did under Sweden, which is true.

Before Barbarossa Paulus who was a supplies officer in the Wehrmacht and other German officers ran an extremely realistic war game to see what would happen if (when) Germany invaded Russia. Their conclusion was that the supply chain would completely break down within 6 months. Their answer to this was we’ll have to beat them in 3 months.

@MrSniperfox29

2 жыл бұрын

They MIGHT have succeeded, had Hitler not wasted a month in a vengeance spat at Yugoslavia, and then by spreading his forces to thin and trying too many objectives at once.

@alexbowman7582

2 жыл бұрын

@@MrSniperfox29 the idea of Blitzkrieg was too seize your objectives ignoring any side campaigns so allowing the British to escape from Dunkirk was the correct thing to do (it wasn’t) because the objective was the fall of France. Hence the siege of Leningrad, the conquest of the Crimea and the battles to annihilate the bypassed and surrounded Russian forces all held back the attack on Moscow. I think Russia was just to big for the Germans and if they had ignored the side issues they may have won but it’s unlikely.

A little bit tense... I love this guy

Amazing video as usual! I'd also like to add that the zar was unhappy because Napoleon had promised him some gains against the Ottomans, which didn't happen. Furthermore, Napoleon was suspected of helping Sweden.

I keep coming back just to hear the “he thought he was going to win” lmao

Howdy. Great. This clip actually answers the why. Regards.

I love these bite sized videos

I love how Napoleon is simultaneously waving in the final screen and doing the Roman Salute.

Russia: warsaw's mine France: no u *invades russia* *gets pushed back by winter* Russia: Bonaparte? More like "BLOWNAPARTE" PS:i know i stole this joke but it is too good

@Admiral45-10

4 жыл бұрын

Russia invading Poland in 1919: *whatever it is you stay your ground* Russia loses Battle of Warsaw (Miracle at Vistula) in 1920 Russia: *RUN!* (Historically accurate)

@amogus4197

4 жыл бұрын

@@Admiral45-10 lol

@PANZERFAUST90

3 жыл бұрын

That's why it's dumb.

Very sarcastic! If you find in your History exam this question: why did napoleon invade Russia? , then respond like this: he thought he will win. Very brief and simple. I wish all Histories exam will be like this.

Hitler visiting Napoleon's tomb in Paris: I will no repeat your mistakes. *Proceeds to invade Russia to isolate Britain.

Correction; 0:16 vs 0:19 maps on Finland are false; Finland was “ost province” of Sweden up until 1809 so in the first map Sweden should own parts of modern Finland.

Anyone attempting to invade Russia: This should be an easy victory The winter: Am about to end this man's whole career

@TheManinBlack9054

4 жыл бұрын

"Quick and easy" they said. "It won't take long" they said.

@manny90963

4 жыл бұрын

The mongol conquest was pretty quick and easy

@davidgil6485

4 жыл бұрын

Nobody never talks about WWI that wasn't an easy victory (like everything in WWI) but still was pretty heavy.

@yarpen26

4 жыл бұрын

@@davidgil6485 Aside from WWI proving that Russia can indeed be successfully invaded (I'm not sure but wasn't the Brest-Litovsk treaty the single biggest cession of territory between warring powers in European history?), ever since the Mongol grip waned, the Russians had the tremendous advantage of never being threatened by an organized power on its non-European borders, only having to bother with small Siberian and Central Asian tribes, grossly weakened and unstable China as well as distant European colonies, unable to field large armies. Japan in the early 20th century might be an exception but even they didn't really attack Russia unprovoked. If you removed nuclear weapons from the picture, today's China could easily provide a European alliance with help from the other side, making it possible for a conquest of Russia. Siberia is vast but once you get your armies moving across it, there's no stopping you, as evident in the Russian Civil War: there are no natural formations, large bodies of water or high enough mountains for Russia to base its defenses on.

@Narekz

4 жыл бұрын

@@manny90963 it was less hard because the mongols came from the east😂

"The poles in Napoleon said no" I die of laughter

Thank you needed the tutorial

The morbidly funny part, is that it went horrible from day 1. I believe attrition, and small skirmishes had already withered away something like 30-40% of the army before he even reached Borodino. Which significantly added to deaths, and wounded, which he continued to move further into Russia. Even if he had turned around after Borodino. The invasion would still have been a catastrophe.

Your map for 1799 is wrong. For instance, Finland didn't belong to Russia at the time. That's ten years later.

@cgt3704

3 жыл бұрын

And we still had bassarabia

but just HOW was Russia able to trade with Britain when they had no land connection, and all warm-water straits were controlled by Napoleon and allies ... ??!

@Je-suis-pauvre

2 жыл бұрын

Trading with SHIPS, UK destroyed much of the french navy at Trafalgar and uk was pretty much the master of the seas

@kurzackd

2 жыл бұрын

@@Je-suis-pauvre yeah, ok, but Napoleon's ALLIES still had navies, which would have prevented, no??

@centurymemes1208

2 жыл бұрын

@@kurzackd not powerful enough to combat britain and some ships that napoleon was planning to get in copenhagen for example was destroyed by the british to prevent napoleon from gaining access to those too

@kurzackd

2 жыл бұрын

@@centurymemes1208 interesting... ok, thanks!

Just goes to show . It's a good idea to have the weather on your side !

Can you do a video on Yugoslavia and it’s collapse

How to not get doomed Step 1 : " Never Invade Mother Russia "

Dear Sir, can you kindly produce a video on the Concert of Europe led by Prince Metternich of Austria?

"Quick and easy" and "invade Russia" do not belong in the same book, let alone the same sentence.

"He thought he going to win" ain't that why everyone do things in the first place?

@watching99134

2 жыл бұрын

It's also not a reason "why" (Napoleon could have also conquered say Serbia, but why wouldn't he do that instead?)

Napoleon: “Damn the Russian winter got hands. *I wonder if somebody else would loose the same way I did.”* (Angry German noises)

@Suksass

Жыл бұрын

Funny thing. While Hitler failed, the German Kaiser successfully invaded and won in ww1.

@krealyesitisbeta5642

Жыл бұрын

@@Suksass I mean, Russia was basically falling apart at that point.

@Suksass

Жыл бұрын

@@krealyesitisbeta5642 Yes, thanks to Germany beating them on the battlefield.

@user-qn5pm9mm5o

Жыл бұрын

@@Suksass Germany just increased speed of collapse, but Nicolas 2 has already problems with Russians and others.

"He thought he was going to win." Perfect.

Wait, the idea was "My wars with Spain and Portugal are going badly, so let's start another one far away in a huge country known for its horrible winters."?!

The most obvious reason he invaded was because he fought he was going to win. Love it.

Watch Epic History TV's Napoleon retreat from Moscow. It was one of the most brilliant tactical survival retreats in history.

@ddc2957

2 жыл бұрын

Great video. Michel Ney, what a demon.

I was looking away for a second and got absolutely jumpscared by the gunshot at 0:22 - pay attention in history class kids

People would never repeat Napoleon’s mistake right? Hitler: Hold my Swastika!

Surprised you didn’t mention the treaty of Tilsit, I took a class on the French Revolution and Napoleonic wars and a lot of emphasis was placed on that with concern to Russia and the invasion of them

Wait is history matters now a part of that armchair historian-alternatehistoryhub crossover?

@flipjonah2348

4 жыл бұрын

I think it's just a big coincidence but would be cool if it was

@seribelz

4 жыл бұрын

yeah something is fishy

Keep it going.

Still amazing content.

"Everyone has a plan until they get smacked on the mouth." - Mike Tyson

Top 10 most accurate war movies

0:25 U forgot about austrians giving krakov area to duchy of warsaw

"the continental system was basically the Don't Trade with Britain club" lmfao

"He thought he would win" - said everyone who invaded Russia...

Could you continue your History of England series?

When your about to back-hand your friend but its cold outside. *Sad Frog Legs Noises*

I like how everyone kinda dismisses the Austrian attempt in 1809 as just idiocy, even though they actually handed Napoleon himself one of his major defeats at Aspern-Essling, before they ultimately lost narrowly at the Battle of Wagram, because they had adapted to French tactics. One of Napoleon’s lessons is to not fight one enemy too much, lest they learn your tricks; in the case of the Austrians, we can see that one should take this lesson to heart. When a French courtier mocked the Austrians’ military capability, Napoleon responded coldly, “You clearly were not at Wagram.”

Too much victory does weird things to the psyche.

@alanpennie8013

4 жыл бұрын

It's a confirmation bias / Black Swan problem. Every year for over a decade Napoleon solved his problems (temporarily) by crushing his enemies in quick summer campaign. Why would he not expect this approach to keep working?

My favorite parts of your videos is when your historical roblox figures get uncomfortably close to one another