Professor Tara Shears, Thank you for your presentation.

Diego, these experiments are the key to inventing, understanding and making solutions to these problems of which you speak. Science has improved our world beyond anything else in history. To abandon science is to abandon a better future for all.

Great talk, complex subject presented with awe, respect and wit. Loved the presenter, she is so beautiful.

I'm amazed how she ended her exposition at 0:00 on the counter. As soon as she says "thank you" the screen turns red.

Brilliant speech, by a brilliant person !

"By matter I mean stuff. The stuff that makes up stuff around us." ---- Professor Tara Shears BEST SCIENCE QUOTE

Anyone else here after reading angels and demons by dan brown?? This is really good btw thank you so much

It's 2018 now and CERN is making anti atoms by themselves. We are, indeed learning a lot about the universe.

Great presentation, thanks.

thank you very much! I love this lesson's so educational, is so sad, it only have so few views!

Awesome! Thanks for sharing :)

My main problem? When (and if) the Big Bang occurred, was the role of each particle already determined? Was that the only possible role? The idea that quarks sprang into existence already equipped to assemble with other quarks to form protons and neutrons (and their antimatter equivalents), and electrons also appeared with the exact characteristics necessary to merge with other particles to form atoms? Oh we will need more particles to hold quarks together, and what about keeping the electrons in place? Are there any orbit shells in the kit?

Thank you in 2021. Wonder what's happened since 2015???

Perhaps big bang occurred due to annihilation of matter and anti matter , which resulted in " universe with matter " . Perhaps matter is the winner in this collision.

@smasher123ism

6 жыл бұрын

vani m kosaraju It actually was. There was around equal amount of both these types of matter but normal matter had a little bit more left over and it now composed the universe.

Antimatter was predicted by Paul Dirac 50-100 years ago.

@pihi42

7 жыл бұрын

Exactly the thought I had when I heard "we don't have a theory that predicts them"... Weird. Wouldn't expect that from a world-class physicist..

@AmrikSingh-bv2of

7 жыл бұрын

Yeah it is odd. The Dirac equation was 1928.

@aynurskene7231

7 жыл бұрын

I like to listen their lectures for self improve but i do not like the lectures ends with lack of any explanation about.We can not see,we can not smell,we can not hear,etc about anti matter,dark matter,dark energy,so on.If,if someone comes along...with another theory...

@gilian2587

6 жыл бұрын

Dirac's equation also 'predicts' negative E solutions. When you've got a hybrid energy/momentum equation which attempts describe the states of a system; you can end up with some strange results. The difficulty is; how do you interpret these things? It's not the same as having an intuitive theory that explains 'Under conditions x,y, and z; antimatter will be generated'

@deeremeyer1749

6 жыл бұрын

So where is it?

Awesome

Fantastic -- at last ---- a physicist who knows how to pronounce quark. Rest easy James Joyce.

An electron went into a bar. In a corner booth was a positron nursing a drink. He went over and they had a drink together. Then another...and another. At the end of the night they got _annihilated._

I finally understood the antimatter.

Thank y ou

One open interesting research question is "how come lightning makes so much antimatter?" There were more than 10 papers on that at the last AGU meeting. Govt got interested because every lightning bolt shows up on the satellites they were hoping would only show nuclear bomb production.

8:00 It's probably not surprising since the big bang is an event from a single place and it is reasonable to assume matter anti-matter probably distributed mostly perfectly and they probably interact with matters from other universes so some of them got lost while occilate over there. If the big bang were more perfect than the radio back ground should be more saturated.

bascially we know very little. how sad QwQ

if the original ratio of matter/anti-matter was close to parity, how is it now that anti-matter is so rare - how, i.e., did the ratio change? or is it still the same?

what I think is ,isn't it possible that our universe that is made of matter ,and another universe made of antimatter, revolve around our universe ,or vice versa(by relativity) .just like proton and electron might be

I've scraped some of that anti-matter off my brake discs. It plays havoc.

In short: Antimatter is that same as matter but have opisite charge. Thx for attencion, now applaud!

She ended the talk exactly on 00:00 on the counter...Bullseye!!!!!

Even if I couldn`t understand half the thing she said it sure was cool.

"What You See Is What You Get", of the observable universe, and jumping to conclusions about the process in simplified terms is fine, as a theory, but the dynamic process cannot cannot continue to be treated as a static event, all the test results of circular arguments will close in on themselves and cannot be extrapolated if the actual First Principle is not applied. Because all information is quantized with its origin in time.

it´s very very crazy

We can create a lot of anti matter by heating space to a very high degree so we can turn off the Higgs field and let equal quantities of matter and anti matter form, then we magnetically confine anti matter. There. That's the recipe to create anti matter in large quantity. Unlike today, we need to rely on collision chance or decay of atom.

@EattinThurs61

5 жыл бұрын

How make this big fire?

As long as your trying to prove the Big Bang you will always be "scratching your head". I have a idea! Instead of trying to prove the Big Bang and disprove creation, try proving creation and disprove the Big Bang. You will be amazed before your half way finished.

energy = d(m/Q) = d((cos+sin^2)^(1/2)) mass = m/Q = |((cos+sin)^2^(1/2)) @ (135,315) = +- 0 NULL @ ( 45,225) = +- 1.414 energy @ (0, 180) = neutrons (true anti) clock and counter @ (90,270) = +- Q where cos = current loop horizontal longitude and sin = vertical voltage latitude where power = azimuth all other particles can be created by precess looping @(0 phase, 180 phase) @ 1/2 of 1/2 but what freezes energy into mass besides magnetic fields.

Here's what's sad. I've recently started watching some quantum physics videos in regards to matter and anti-matter, and though she explains things in a very theoretical way, I find the application for people who doesn't understand quantum mechanics (myself included) very hard to relate with. For example. So what if matter and anti-matter exists? Doesn't affect me. But in truth, if the universe was so perfectly symmetrical (which is believed to be so in a vacuum environment) Then for every matter created, anti-matter was created simultaneously. And even though our universe is mostly composed of matter, the question is "where is all the anti matter?" My theory is that our universe is the "matter" universe while the "anti-matter" universe also exists out there, containing mostly of anti-matter with minimal matter. It's is only a matter of time where our universe collides and everything is destroyed and converted into pure energy only to be restarted again. This is constantly shown in science's own tested environment, where they created a "nothing" vacuum. So the big bang is probably when the universes collided. So if we move forward through time, anti-matter moves backwards. If only we can glimpse at the antimatter universe and find out what date they have, and they find out what date we have, then we have an idea when our universe will "big bang" again!

I think it is cute when a woman ear stick out of her hair so cutey clever. Tara is beauty

Evidently matter and anti matter can exist together if you understood how to see anti matter and what is for. Do any body have a means of see or measuring anti matter.

she says there are no large patches of antimatter out there, and i was like, what about the supervoid? the only large in space in space where nothing seams to exist. i cant find anything about theories involving antimatter and the supervoid though... i cant be the only one who has thought of it, right?...

When do people come together instead of arguing? Interestconflicts??

Lovely voice - like Jenny Agutter.

Why do I keep hearing the quantity of matter vs. anti-matter differed? Is there some good reason why it couldn't have been uneven clumping?

@EattinThurs61

5 жыл бұрын

One takes out one hence 101 matter takes out 100 antimatter but leaves one matter, our universe. As soon as they encounter the other annhilation.

May I say something ,if it came from from a field of anti matter to form the material what if the field of ant mater origin is still there being obscured by the matter also at the point of forming did it not annihilate each other. MAking light just a question!

@JadedLibs

9 жыл бұрын

ann prince The prevailing theory is that it did annihilate, but there was a slight asymmetry between the two. Everything we see in the Universe the left over matter that had nothing to annihilate with. There are other theories, however, and there are also many theories regarding what caused the asymmetry between anti-matter and matter. In the lab, they are always created in equal amounts, and in nature they are always observed as pairs, so finding the cause of the initial asymmetry (assuming that this theory is correct) is of great interest to scientists.

Just a different energy spectrum and that says you can have antimatter in the matter form.

Whats the number in the triangle?

@aibel99

8 жыл бұрын

+joseph smith i think its 1.61 recurring. Or maybe 3.145132987570384598357 aka pie. the universe is getting real predictable real quick.

Antimatter is like sleeping or loading... without it, we wouldn't matter either...

Is this matter, antimatter something you get in your eyes? Does it matter? What if a tree falls in the woods and no one is around when it hits the ground? Does it make a sound? Does this matter?

Thanks, at least understood something... But still I don't have any clue about the difference between anti matter and dark matter...

If anti-matter is so rare, how are we going to power our warp drives we finally make the Enterprise?

so now we are human and there is anti human which means another opposite parallel universe?

@smasher123ism

6 жыл бұрын

Ivan wong No. In the beginning of the universe there were just about equal amounts of normal matter and anti matter. But the little bit extra normal matter was left over after the rest destroyed each other.

The real question is: Do we need anti-matter and dark-energy? My humble yet short answer is as follows: No.

@mohit5496

3 жыл бұрын

offen this No turn into Yes over time. Infact most of time.

Where do you buy them shrooms

I hear someone has said that 1gram of antimatter or dark matter(i dont know which one,sorry) is equal to 4 times of bomb that has landed at hiroshima?

They said "We only have about a galaxies worth..."... Lol... they also saying "There should be an abundance of it throughout the cosmos, but we just aren't seeing it... " they looking for it though... 👍 Oh and... by the way, We are definitely seeing too much matter...

why cant they just say we have no idea what they are and keep discussing dirac eq's anti matters? i'd feel much happier.

Phyisics in Scouseville ...

Never mind anti-matter, what is matter and what is it made of?.

I see no reason to assume that there weren't two universes created at the same time, one matter, one anti- matter....

@smasher123ism

6 жыл бұрын

Russell Howe Because matter and anti matter destroy each other. But if you are interested in multiple universes there is a multi universe theory. Where matter resonates in different frequencies being in the same place in space and same time.

@2Worlds_and_InBetween

5 жыл бұрын

...or you mean the way it is. >"Where matter resonates in different frequencies being in the same place in space and same time."

Are there antiphotons? Haven't seen that question addressed, as asking about antigravitons or antitime too, seem not worth spending significant time talking about from people with the wherewithal to give serious answers. If someone with the skills of this talented professor were to present such a presentation, I'd sure hang on every word.

@smasher123ism

6 жыл бұрын

Ron Hoffstein No. because this is radiation and not actual matter composed of protons. These subatomic particles are forms of radiation.

@smasher123ism

6 жыл бұрын

Ron Hoffstein Except for anti gravitons and graviton which is very unknown. They are not matter nor radiation. Maybe gravity is an effect composed of no particles, but exotic matter exists that has a similar effect per particle.

thanks for killing us Cern :)

latest theory about the dirth of anti-matter in our universe - anti-matter travels backwards in time.

How can they put a price at something that doesnt even confirm it existence yet?

@SamTuke

4 жыл бұрын

Its existence is confirmed

Matter + Antimatter = 0 Therefore, keep your antimatter in a magnetic bottle.

@AspenEmrys

8 жыл бұрын

actually... E = mc²

@aibel99

8 жыл бұрын

+trefrog what about f=ma ? or V=I/R or even ex plus alpha?!

@AspenEmrys

8 жыл бұрын

irrelevant or negligible... but check out Tara in the thumbnail... HADOKEN

so what happened in 2015?

@Muhafaka

8 жыл бұрын

+Jihane Punk ... on 22-23 september or 27-28 september they will start it again at 2x capacity.

@Davidamp

8 жыл бұрын

+FFS i dont wanna be rude, but, you believe in god, dont you?

@XIntelGamer

8 жыл бұрын

+FFS What you are referring to is dark matter not antimatter. Antimatter: In particle physics, antimatter is material composed of antiparticles, which have the same mass as particles of ordinary matter but opposite charges, as well as other particle properties such as lepton and baryon numbers and quantum spin. Dark Matter: Dark matter is a hypothetical kind of matter that cannot be seen with telescopes but would account for most of the matter in the universe. The existence and properties of dark matter are inferred from its gravitational effects on visible matter, on radiation, and on the large-scale structure of the universe.

@Elusive7thElement

8 жыл бұрын

+FFS Just want to highlight some issues in your earlier statements: Black holes and the Doppler effect are proven facts, and also that red-shift/blue-shift is not caused by distance. And gravity is only too weak to hold galaxies together if you assume that it weakens by the inverse square over distance, if you assume that it weakens linearly then the numbers line up quite well. Of course if you assume linearity our local solar system doesn't work at all, so it seems to me that the next most sensible hypothesis after dark matter is that for some reason gravity acts differently on a large scale, in much the same way that classical mechanics do not work at a quantum scale. Additionally, some questions: How do you explain the fact that gravitational lensing occurs where we expect dark matter to be present? And if galaxies are indeed held together via an electro-magnetic field, what is responsible for this field? Such a field would require an energy or mass source equivalent to the missing mass of dark matter(or energy equivalence), so it doesn't solve the missing mass/energy question.

@jmatt98

7 жыл бұрын

Al gore's climate change predictions came to frustration. We are all under water 💦 as I type this.

how did she become a prof of physics

@LordLOC

9 жыл бұрын

hayal serefhanov Probably went to college (or university) and got a degree in Physics. Then a doctorate one would imagine.

@hayalserefhanov6229

9 жыл бұрын

that was rhetorical question, moron

@LordLOC

9 жыл бұрын

hayal serefhanov I'm aware it was a rhetorical question. But thanks for the compliment regardless!

@hayalserefhanov6229

9 жыл бұрын

fuck off

"Want to show why it MATTERS for us." Huh?

it took 100,000 years before the first atoms showed up?

@MakisGirg

8 жыл бұрын

+Steve Haigh Trafic was a bitch back then.

7 жыл бұрын

The plasma was so hot, that the paticles that did briefly form were nearly instantly smashed to bits again. The temperature had to drop to even allow matter to form.

That title's so ironic

Yo dawg I heard you like matter, so I put antimatter in your matter so you can antimatter your matter and create light.

I can’t believe they were laughing at her

@vgrof2315

3 жыл бұрын

Laughing with her, I'm sure. Who could disrespect her in any way?

If there is antimatter, there must also be antidarkmatter.....

She left out that the sound of the car changes as it goes by.

What if the simulation were only meant for simple lifeforms and the answers they are looking for were never meant to be rendered from the data and they crash the system.

"2015 May contain the answer!" Sorry.

"Let's talk about anti-matter...." even though nobody has ever seen one. "It's fact...." even though it's more like fiction, but we'll talk like it's real okay?

@meshakvb6431

8 жыл бұрын

gconol Nobody's ever seen an atom either, but we know they exist. Antimatter has been "seen" in the same way that quarks have been seen. Antimatter could even be collected and utilized for 100 million dollars.

@gconol

8 жыл бұрын

Bigbadd Woofe Atom has been proven over and over through chemistry and physics. We get solid results through experimentation. Dark Matter on the other hand ......nuthin. Dark Matter was born because their equation about the universe is flawed. Instead of investigating the error and starting again, they just make up shit to 'band-aid' the problem. This is typical modern physics these days which is why it's become soooo complicated. It's one band aid after another.

@dubstepXpower

8 жыл бұрын

gconol They use antimatter in positrons (positive electrons, ) in medicine.

is she really telling me bananas give off antimatter?

How many bananas would i need to make a functional positron ray?

@jmatt98

7 жыл бұрын

Frank van der Werf 3,645,664,200,567,327,599,433.09 🍌 by my calculation🤓

Well it's 2018, then what has happened till now? Can anyone tell me? I genuinely want to know.

It's amazing how she can take so majestic a concept as Antimatter; something that should intrigue and excite us all, and make it so utterly mundane and unappealing. I mean, if this talk newly introduced you to the idea of Antimatter, then you'd be readily forgiven for coming to the half-bored/ half-depressed conclusion, that the only "real" benefits of detecting/ generating Antimatter, would be to settle our academic curiosity re: the state of the universe in its early formation... Gnaaah.... i dunno... The drugs are wearing off. I guess I could be being overly pessimistic.

She is cute

I like intelligent women.

You must know where your Double Ganger is at all times of day and night, so you don't run into you hahaha It's true ,Just one problem You don't look the Same ?

It's a shame when videos like this get 100,000 views while flat earth videos get over 500,000.

6:55 nice fairy tale lol

Damn people are full of lies, prejudice, misinformation and hatred...

the tr3b needs antimatter

...klat dooG

Nice video, I want to learn more about antimatter and I have queries. According to bigbang theory's matter/antimatter collides to form all these things,. Now there all over matters only, Where is the antimatter?

If bananas emit antimatter, that means the enialation process is a choice.

She looks like a dude I played baseball with in the South Florida League.

It really doesn't matter.

Yeah and so whos the one who created the anti matter? :P

@jmatt98

7 жыл бұрын

wiggins5953 anti Christ

If there is a graviton, then there must be an anti-graviton.

@SeymourSunshine

9 жыл бұрын

WRONG! a graviton is a force carrier like a photon ... and these massless particles don't have anti-particles. Sorry.

@hyperopinionated1138

9 жыл бұрын

Seymour Sunshine Well, since there's no such thing as a graviton, we'll never know. It's a theoretical particle that has never been discovered.

@SeymourSunshine

9 жыл бұрын

HyperOpinionated It's a theoretical particle that hasn't been discovered YET!

@hyperopinionated1138

9 жыл бұрын

Seymour Sunshine And it may never be because gravity might not even be a fundamental force.

@SeymourSunshine

9 жыл бұрын

HyperOpinionated It probably is because ∇.g = 4 π G ρ and ∇xg = 0 which are properties of a simple vector field. Since gravity exist in a vacuum, it must be a fundamental force. :-)

aunty always matters.....🚀

92,969 views only. Disappointing isn't it......

I think the majority of the anti-matter has preceded the matter and formed a ball or a bubble surrounding the matter of the universe. Which is why the universe is expanding rapidly, trying to react with the antimatter. As well, anti-matter would do the exact opposite of matter. Matter clumps together where I think ant-matter would disperse with the equal speed. Gravity pulls, anti-matter pushes.

can you make an underwater wheel that uses weights and airbags and gravity and is a perpetual motion device... not a toy but all the electricity you could ever want to generate for free on demand... although parts do wear out... I can : )

Well for all you who don't see the point. Go for FGNW (Fouth Generation Nuclear Weapon). When I see talking her it reminds me on the word's of Dr. Rose in a monolog about D-Wave Computers: “ . . . .Its like standing on the altar of an Aliengod . . .”

Professional madness at work.

Bananas just like in "Back to the Future 2"! Just stuff a banana in the flying car quipolator and there you go anti matter fusion!!! That's what she's playing on!

What