And that why I love scientists, their like “and we might be wrong, how cool would that be? We can learn so many new things if we got it wrong”...the complete opposite of most people’s mindsets

@sardonyxabsalom7910

4 жыл бұрын

Interesting, I feel the opposite. Wish I didn't. I grew up a hardcore nerd. I was reading the TOsR in German when I was 10 and loved particle physics. LOVED. I Loved science for its open exploration of the world. Then more and more I saw only closed minds. Not 'how cool if we're wrong' but "WE ARE ALWAYS RIGHT! SCIENCE ÜBER ALLES! !" Absolute rejection of ANY data which is not a consensus agreement regardless of truthfulness of experimental proof. So often. SO often. Science is an effective and nuanced tool for the analysis of the physical world. Effective and nuanced tool or methodology of inquiry. But not a religion. Once science became a religion I left the membership thanks. It's only a METHOD of inquiry. Not a worldview but it is informing many many areas it has no validity in such as conciousness studies. This NEED to be the one and only way of thinking and the one and only worldview is so transparently Hegelian. The Hegelian pendulum: people are hyper extreme religious then it swings through balance to hyper extreme science and repeat. The Renaissance, Enlightenment, etc etc church then science then church then science then... To me being at the 100% extreme of EITHER swing is to be deluded by popular opinion and lost to truth. Science can be as fanatical and closeminded a cult as any religion. That's ok that's sociology. It's the part where noone notices that everyone else "just happens" to agree with an expected Hegelian phase means people aren't really thinking about it. That is disappointing. There is so much to learn if we didn't wear blinders to all that the Opinion de Jour has identified as heresy, and treats with the same contempt as any other heresy. Does no one see this?

@hkleehk1

3 жыл бұрын

@@sardonyxabsalom7910 "Science describe, but not prescribe", so I was told by the only one top flyer, a Christian, in HK Secondary Sch open exam, Ronald Fung of HK, more than 50 yrs ago. I still remain a fervent reader in the Golden State, of H.L.Mencken, the Sage of Baltimore (1880-1956), an agnostic.

@camirose3009

2 жыл бұрын

@@sardonyxabsalom7910 I think the initial comment was a sarcastic one 🙃

@brunoborer7038

Жыл бұрын

@@sardonyxabsalom7910 Yes. Science is an objective inquiry into the nature of reality. But objectivity is not our natural state but rather an acquired discipline. Politics and religion can and often do derail science. To be dogmatic and closed minded is the antithesis of true science. To follow a trail of facts and evidence to what was previously an impossible conclusion is an act that personifies the pioneering spirit of the scientific mind. One of the first physicians who postulated the existence of microorganisms and their possible relationship to disease was ruthlessly attacked by the other scientists of his day. Dogma is the death of reason…

@TheMosturgent

Жыл бұрын

Whenever they are wrong, humanity suffers permanently.

This is an accurate, accessible talk about a difficult subject, the hardest kind of talk to do. Thank you Doctor for taking your valuable time to prepare and give this talk.

I feel smart watching this

Once I asked a CERN Physicist what an electron was. He said, "We don't know. All we do know is the mathematical relationship between our measurements." So I asked how does the measurement work? He answered, "Same deal. Everything we know about particle physics is explained in terms of particle physics measurement, using what we assume to be particles that create what we are measuring." I said, "You're talking in circles. He said, "You got a better explanation?"

@TheHalusis

9 жыл бұрын

I can answer a step further. want to really know Or are you defining a Man?

@SuHAibLOL

9 жыл бұрын

TheHalusis i want to know

@TheHalusis

9 жыл бұрын

Subob KUBOsaki 2 opposite vorticed Electromagnetic photons in a 4th dimensional toroid

@shiitakestick

7 жыл бұрын

well do ya , punk ?

@helium73

7 жыл бұрын

Well I'm just curious if the standard model is similar to the Ptolemaic system. It served to explain everything for over 1000 years and did a good job however later it was found to be totally wrong when a much more elegant explanation came along.

I would love to see the education and level of experience with particle physics that these people in the comments have that are criticizing everything about this guys talk and the Higgs.

@JohnPKING-nj8nc

6 жыл бұрын

I get the feeling that someday there will be no privacy - we'll know everything about anyone we meet or interact with online - background checks, education, work experience, religion, politics, credit rating will all display in a corner of our retinas - kind of the way we can run a check online by paying a fee and seeing where a person has lived, see if there are any arrest records, financial data, age, relatives - it all seems like it is headed in that direction and last but not least we could see every comment made on social media and decide if that person is a trolling nitwit who punks people everyday online because no one likes them or wants to even hear what they have to say

Im looking forward to see where this fascinating discovery goes. This also reveals we have much to learn about the universe.

@Kleaz80

4 жыл бұрын

Luis Lancon 6 yrs later, are you fascinated?

Wonderful presentation. I love TED talks!

STOP cutting away to show me the speaker's face - KEEP THE EQUATIONS AND THE GRAPHICS ON THE SCREEN.

ok years ago i watched a show on photons...it bothered me that noone knew how it traveled so far without a jetpack or something...i saw something at work one day dragging a mop bucket full of water..something got stuck under the wheel and the water vibrated..it looked like something i saw in a lecture about qauntum mechanics...i realized once i saw that that there were waves in space and photons were swept up in it and it goes from crest to crest without spending any time in the middle...i also envisioned these waves being compressed near solid objects like planets or asteroids creating a artificial gravity by pushing down on atoms..i also think the compressed waves around a large object could cause light to bend around that object...i sought out alot of different things on this topic to see if someone had a theory about this and found nothing...i was watching a show i think on time dialation because i think the waves being compressed or expanded can have a effect on time...and they started talking about the higgs boson field and they had a drawing of it and right then and there i realized they knew what i was talking about...i felt vindicated...the few people i told about this prob thought i was nuts..i do realize the planets revolve around the sun for different reasons which is why i believe gravities are created by multiple ways...i never found out someone had already came up with this theory because whenever i saw higgs boson i knew they were talking about a particle and i dont care about particles just the field...its my idea that this field was created by explosions on stars and supernovas and anything else that makes shockwaves which causes this field to intensify...i saw that before the big bang the higgs field was at zero which was what i thought too which emboldened me to write this...i figured if by some chance im right i better say it now...it could already be too late...also i am not educated and im not trying to sound smarter than i am...i only did what i had to do to graduate high school...i also think man made waves collapse the higgs boson field which is why when they turned on detectors in the double slit experiment the electrons were no longer waves but particles...sorry had to toss that in...i hope someone at least found this interesting...im taking the blue pill and going back to my life...thank you mr higgs and mr boson

Peter Higgs was Assited by Indian Physicist & Mathematics Genius Satyendranath Bose. Thats how Higgs Boson came into existence. But Higgs was so Fame Hungry, that He never mentioned Bose's name. He took the Credit all by Himself.

@gstacks510

5 жыл бұрын

Is that where "Bose" sound system comes from?

@aishwarytiwari2534

5 жыл бұрын

@@gstacks510 no, its the construct of another indian who's currently ruling the industry

In 1987, during a lunch at Fermi National lab, Leon Lederman told me that his books name was supposed to be the “God dammed particle” but his editor told him that, in order to better sell the book, the word “dammed” should be dropped. He wanted the book to be more light and funny but his editor thought that a more grandiose name will be wiser. Every explanation other than this for the “God Particle” in the title is just not true.

I love how the speaker admits what they have found may not behave like the Higgs they predicted would, but he is only open to adding new particles with this info not changing anything in what CERN supporters already agree on even though they admit it's broken without the Higgs which CERN can barely detect even though it exists at all times and basically dictates energy turning from light or massless to having mass or solid.

I love Ted talks wonderful presentetion

Graviton is still missing

is there graffiti on the wall at 07:43??

Excellent... thanks.

I thinking the discovery is great since u know the frequency of the higgs y not let the supercomputer play it and next angle of things the next way to capture is to slow down since it dont last be4 it transform to solid. Energy freeze it in its state

@moodleblitz

4 жыл бұрын

what?

It would be nice if you'd cut to the slides when he's referencing them.

If they collide about a hundred million pairs of protons together each second, and 1 in 10 billion collisions result in a Higgs, does that means that they got Higgs Boson every 100 second? It is not so extraordinarily rare or what I'm missing here

Like dropping pebbles into a pond dividing a unit of space/ multiplied by one unit of time. The greater the mass/energy density of inward spherical boson waves generating heat by multiplying electrical potential along cubic dynameters compressing the wave amplitude now+4-0-4+-the shorter the expanding transverse waves dividing gravity from its source. Energy compression pi +1=mass.de-compressing C2 forming acceleration-G from zero curvature, wave front by wave front as time unfolds. E2=mc2c4p2c2

Is that Higgs Boson you're wearing?

@waynemeher117

7 жыл бұрын

Why , yes , it is.

@shiitakestick

7 жыл бұрын

Wayne Meher , smelled you from Vega ..

Turn volume up!!!

There is a difference between mass and density. A cubic inch of lead, for example, is much heavier than a cubic foot of cotton candy. Size doesn't matter so much in this context.

So now that the standard model seems to be complete (at least this is what the lecturer says), what now holds for string theory in the future? Are physicists going to pursue it with the same vigour?

Wait a damn minute now.....so its possible the matter around us is..alive??? Or either we live in a simulated reality ? Im concerned and confused

My theory (Genesis of Relativity) explains EVERYTHING, including God, afterlife, end of Universe, etc... Voltage cannot be used to measure mass. Gravitational attraction is mass. Voltage is electrical charge. An electric charge spins to produce a magnetic dipole, which spins to produce the sphere which is the atom which generates the gravitational field/force. Gravity is the product of electric and magnetic forces cancelling out, leaving a net attractive force, because of the twisting of space.

@prateekghosh637

4 жыл бұрын

Please elaborate it...

@prateekghosh637

4 жыл бұрын

Have you any blog or thesis available on Internet???

Physical things can be massless because as the guy just explains in this video, there is what we now call the higgs field that spans all space and through which particles travel and in doing so gain mass. However, since all particles do not interact with this field, not all particles have mass. Disclaimer: I am not a physicist and this is simply my understanding of the theory, so I may be mistaken (in which case I hope someone corrects me).

@mylordincreasemeinknowledg7389

5 жыл бұрын

Perhaps those particles that dont interact with the H. Field already has mass. Hence they don't need anymore . Just a thought.

Think of gravity and the higgs field as having a kind of symbiotic relationship. Both are explained as a random accident by atheists like Steven Hawking. On the subject of gravity, Hawking says, "some universes may have none, while in ours we got lucky." We don't know why they exist or how they were created. Yet each of these would be worthless without the other. That's intelligent design, and an example of why Christians love science.

I have learnt that the Higgs 'boson' was the excitement caused in the field when a particle interacts with it and not a physical part of the field, from 6:00 to 6:12, he speaks of them to be more like a little part of the field instead of the exctiation. Can anyone clear my doubt?

@ArjunKumar-rw8qd

7 жыл бұрын

you have certainly caused a great deal of excitation in a fellow member of your specie with exhibiting what is generally non existent, an allure of a lady interested in the sciences, which is I.

@ArjunKumar-rw8qd

7 жыл бұрын

you have certainly caused a great deal of excitation in a fellow member of your specie with exhibiting what is generally non existent, an allure of a lady interested in the sciences, which is I.

Wish I could understand this 🤦‍♂️

@christinaday6086

3 жыл бұрын

There having paranormal activity now..demons. Devil's..

Indeed, great discovery! Thanks for the informative talk.

XX~ TIME/GOD/THOUGHT/ Neurotic ACT between the CAVITIES OF OUR little BRAINS. WE ARE ALL THINKING GODS ~THINKING THE ABSURD.

Light is a physical thing, and is mass-less. I know that doesn't answer your question, and to be honest, it's a long answer (one of which I do not know the answer too) But that is a demonstration how something can be physical and mass-less.

@brian6078

5 жыл бұрын

light is a particle

Boson named after SN Bose an Indian physicist

explained nicely

actually i did know

what is the magnitude and unit of higgs field?

@rjmj7725

7 жыл бұрын

Monirul Islam its on the left wing, with ryan giggs.

This particle figures in my story POOT-A-RAMA (The Doberman-Man Chronicles). A Higgs boson (in the 1950's) smashes through a Doberman dog and then through a boy in a one-in-a-million collison....thus transferring some of the dog's DNA to the boy.....

String theory isn't testable using modern equipment, therefore isn't falsifiable. It's remarkably elegant, and intuitive (to a certain extent) but that doesn't mean it's right. Right now it's less of a science and more of a mathematical curiosity.

Whoo! It's not well understood by the particle physicists either, but I don't get it AT ALL.

how can a physical thing be massless? thanks

how the earth get it mass and gravity

He never explained what practical good this will do mankind? It's fine for some academic book but can we do with this new information?

@aidanmargarson5581

7 жыл бұрын

ok if your for real and not a troll .. why you invest in knowledge just because .. facebook.com/neildegrassetyson/videos/10155195888806613/

@waynemeher117

7 жыл бұрын

Because we will understand fields and maybe new forces . Perhaps be able to travel the universe some day and speeds at or greater than the speed of light.

@lobo-92

6 жыл бұрын

Not everything about science should be exploitative for our human greed. Eventually it will manifest into some form of technology. But that shouldn't be the fundamentals of science. Be a seeker, not an exploitative being.

Where's the semi-hollow?

Where did you hear that? I didn't notice him say that in this talk. If you're talking about gluons - they're not massive like the higgs.

is it just me or is the animation at about 8:22 a bit inaccurate? it shows a collision of a proton then a bunch of (what i assume is) sub atomic particles.. he seems to explain it as if the quarks have split completely but from what i understand this can not happen. rather the quarks should spread and a bunch of sub atomic particles are produced then fly out?

@PrinsTan

9 жыл бұрын

Protons are formed of three quarks (2up, 1down) and gluons which hold the quarks together. Now, what exactly blew up as the protons collided is not very clear in the animation but we can assume the sub-atomic particles did. And even possibly into smaller particles we do not know as of yet. Or perhaps it was more representative to have a big "explosion" than a very few particles flying away.

@dutchboss509

9 жыл бұрын

PrinsTan i guess im just trying to add up the parts. this was months ago i watched this. would you happen to know how they managed to come up with that rendering? is that actual data or a concept photo?

@dutchboss509

9 жыл бұрын

PrinsTan is it known if quarks or gluon super position?

@PrinsTan

9 жыл бұрын

Dutch Boss well it is data mixed with conceptuel animation. I suggest you check out Bozeman Science's channel, he's a teacher with good skills for explaining chemistry and quantum.

All photons have mass, just no rest mass but not a one has ever been observed at rest, m=hv/c^2. Another dubious Nobel Prize.

@derekburrris480

7 жыл бұрын

terry wilder My job is not to understand the universe or how it works , i don't know much about all of so called methis and matters, but what i do know is, God created the Earth and that's all that matters

@waynemeher117

7 жыл бұрын

The photons do not have rest mass, nor mass when they are moving, but they do have momentum or energy. Particles in motion do not have "more mass" either, just more measured energy.

@anandsuralkar2947

4 жыл бұрын

Its is knows that photos dont have mass its more of a momentum and less of a mass we dont need to see its rest mass

The answer to your math problems is quite simple. The problem is that scientist have not yet figured out the difference between mass and matter. listen as he like the rest interchange the two words as if they are the same thing. the answer to all the math problems and the key to grand unification is a simple equalateral triangle other wise known as planks constant, higgs etc. it's 2D energy quin, one side positive the other negative. these come together to form 3D Matter topologies or tetrahedrons mother nature building blocks.

@TheGargalon

8 жыл бұрын

You should publish that and get a Nobel prize

@mosalireddy5437

5 жыл бұрын

Breakzeitgeist $&)0

Wait, is he saying science is real? Some people aren't going to like this.

If the Higgs Boson is made in space would it behave differently ?

@alanmdot

4 жыл бұрын

If I understood your question correctly (please confirm), I don't think so. The LHC simulates the conditions present less than a second after the big bang.

no they did not mean that but yes one day gravitation will be quantized

boson is inside proton but he said boson is 125 times heavier than proton ,,??? how is that possible?

@Semprefi

5 жыл бұрын

seriousclown I’m with you.what happened to “ the whole is greater than the sum of its parts” ?

Despite the fact that this video is about them finding physical evidence of the 'Higgs'. Yep, that dead body on the floor is all theory.

if you break the higgsfield, would you be able to travel at the speed of light?

@itmarcel

10 жыл бұрын

or able particles to stop interacting with the higgsfield

@dutchboss509

9 жыл бұрын

itmarcel in theory yes.. obviously if you clear the higgs field around you you should be zero mass, with that you could travel the speed of light, have near anti gravity "in an atmosphere" and possible cancel G force.. i wrote a brain fart about it, let me share... Photons, they have zero mass therefor can travel the speed of light.. anything with mass can not supposedly break this speed.. if we ever intend on leaving this planet and travel around our solar system with the ease and time span you would tolerate on a normal car trip we will need to travel the speed of light.. that said, if the higgs boson is a particle we could some how void or scrub off a very massive space craft in theory it would have no mass and could achieve the speed of light.. thats only one example.. if you could control the level of mass in a vehicle here on earth that would be anti gravity would it not? helium has mass but is less dense then air and floats.. so if you lower your crafts mass below the mass of the surrounding atmosphere you would float like a balloon. then when you do get high in the atmosphere a very small propulsion system could get enough delta V to escape earth, no problem.. and to add one more possible concept, G force.. will G force even be a thing with zero mass? meaning if you were going 1400MPH north then instantly reversed direction south and matched speed instantly of 1400MPH would the occupants even feel the slamming halt and G force? this one im not so sure about but i think in theory this is correct as long as nothing on board has mass.. after all, when light hits your mirror and reflects on to the floor there is no crash or bang.. but if you threw an object with a good amount of mass at your mirror you would have 7 years bad luck, it would break.. one more possibility but now im really pushing it because part of me knows this is not correct.. if one were zero mass and traveling mach 1 plus would you disturb the sound barrier? i think you might still due to ballistic coefficient... but, im not 100% sure?? so basically what ive just explained is every effin UFO ever sighted with a logical theory of how one could do that for yourself.. starting with testing and learning more about the higgs

@moodleblitz

4 жыл бұрын

@@dutchboss509, dude... how much time did you spend writing all this?

If things were being done through me without any knowledge then how can i fix it all ?earth should not have to pay for what they chose to do.

Give us more money.

He said a "photon doesnt interact in anyway with higgs field".......WRONG!

@dutchboss509

9 жыл бұрын

TheHalusis explain?

@anandsuralkar2947

4 жыл бұрын

Right i mean he is right u r wrong photons dont interact with higs field thats why they are massless not the full reason of it but mostly

random thoughts, can this be actually a "dark matter"? because of the way it reacts and all that.

@estur76

8 жыл бұрын

That's what I think too. Energy manifests/converts itself into mass/matter and becomes Dark Matter. Science cannot explain what the heck Dark Matter is either lol This is where I get crazy thinking that this is what happens when an "Angel falls from Grace". This is Energy manifesting into Dark Matter....not sure though might be the LSD I just took LOL!

@ArjunKumar-rw8qd

7 жыл бұрын

nipples?

Well, forget Occam's razor.... :-(

Ive never met Higgs

I'm waiting for the God's God particularly.

you didn't actually answer my question. And given your response, you probably don't know what mass is.

What?

very good looking... wish that he's my professor, haha

Yada yada, whoop-dee-doo. Not that I don’t appreciate how important this discovery is. I do. However, as an everyday dude, what I want to know is what will come of this discovery. Will it make my pencil sharper? Will it provide limitless energy so I can take a spaceship to the ends of the universe? Let’s get into that lecture! I can’t seem to find it on online.

He talks like Spider-Man

what are chances of having ANTI GOD PARTICLE?

Don't get a thing .

Who r here after watching DARK

Think about how many dieying children in Africa it could have been saved and than ship them to Germany and feed them for the rest of their lifes.

@alanquintero7

6 жыл бұрын

pulakification think about how many children can eat for the money you would get if you sell all your stuff

@pulakification

6 жыл бұрын

Werther ASMR yeah I should just sell all my stuff and just feed children because their parents don’t use condoms.

@alanquintero7

6 жыл бұрын

You just proved your contradiction

@yves_jotres

5 жыл бұрын

world will be better place if this LHC work

This guy for real? He didnt give me any real info whatsoever and the speech wasnt even interesting

@VanVu-uu3jl

9 жыл бұрын

***** No seriously, He just regurgitated what others have talked about. He didnt even look interested

@dutchboss509

9 жыл бұрын

***** was that a pun due to Van Vu's photo??? lol

@ludwigvonn9889

7 жыл бұрын

i fell a sleep at 6th minute...and i can usually endure a 60 min philosophy lecture without any problems...enough said..

@WinterBornActual

6 жыл бұрын

Gosh, if only all of us were as smart as YOU. We could run around making statements like' Hey everyone! I am much smarter than you because I am bored by physicists making presentatiosn meant for the general public who know little of Physics. Quick, everyone stand up and give me a HUGE clap. Narcissistic bore.

loose the wig i cant take you serious lol

Hahahahahahaha. You sound so 'stable' when you get all preachy. Weird.

Boring presentation 😴