I like how he put on the glove and then promptly handled the device with the other ungloved hand.

@tamsinthai

10 жыл бұрын

He's Dutch.

@heydannypark

7 жыл бұрын

There's only two kinds of people in this world: those that are intolerant of other cultures, and the Dutch.

@crienospmoht

7 жыл бұрын

Your not much if your not Dutch.

@passthebutterrobot2600

6 жыл бұрын

in other universes though he used the gloved hand

@guyjonson6364

6 жыл бұрын

Pass The Butter Robot just a butch

The dealer servicing my car can never tell me what's exactly wrong with it, only what's *probably* wrong with it. I wish they'd stop hiring quantum mechanics.

@Hiney

4 жыл бұрын

You're probably being scammed than or lied about false problems, they won't tell you until after they fix it so you can't prove they're trying to scam you.

@AndreasDelleske

4 жыл бұрын

Mathematicians would only say there is a solution.

@nickw9376

4 жыл бұрын

@@AndreasDelleske the mathematicians don't have to pay for the "observation"

@eboi4599

4 жыл бұрын

I see what you did theyre LOL

@kevinperry2492

4 жыл бұрын

Well played, sir

I just couldn't get over how those gloves were pretty much useless. He still touched it with his other hand. o-o'

@chounoki

8 жыл бұрын

***** That's why I take zero credibility in his talk.

@JohnChampagne

8 жыл бұрын

***** Maybe the gloves protected against the possibility that the voltage potential between his right and left hand would disturb the instrument.

@Chikane204

8 жыл бұрын

Well obviously it was for that reason he used that one glove but it was pointless to use because he only used one and he still touched the device with his other bare hand. You make it sound like his left and right hand have different charges.

@JohnChampagne

8 жыл бұрын

***** The fact that you have any doubt that your left and right hand have different electrical potential tells me that you have never held the input electrodes of an oscilloscope in your hands.

@Chikane204

8 жыл бұрын

sigh, I don't think you understand. The fact remains that both his hands have electric charges. I'm sure your'e aware of what capacitive touch screens are and how they work. Simply putting on a glove on one hand will not affect what ever function you are trying to do on your phone. which means there is still a charge. By the way it wasnt that I had any doubts, it was simply you who prematurely jumped to a shallow conclusion.

Finally a good TED talk. And the Dutch are doing great work especially at Delft.

Of course, not long after this presentation, the first Quantum Computer was presented to the world. I love how the time frames are getting blown away by reality. He said 10 years, it was more like 2. People said we won't be driving electric cars anytime soon, now many people are. How about self driving cars? They're already out there on the roads, awaiting approval. We've been waiting for AI, now we have Watson. I bought the top of the line 1080p TV one Black Friday, the next year, there were curved 4K TV's everywhere and 8K is coming to the shelves soon enough. Things are getting, INSANE. If I only live 10 to 20 more years, it's gonna be a HELL OF A RIDE.

@canadiansaremorons941

8 жыл бұрын

Marc Stinebaugh are you talking about the D-Wave systems quantum computer that is disputably not actualy a quantum computer at all but rather an analog computer ... see Ivan Deutsch article "Quantum Computing Without Qubits"

@CrimsonCorona10

8 жыл бұрын

Z505 Software I knew he was talking about that I call BS too, as currently the only quantum computers in existence is the human (other animals?) brain.

@canadiansaremorons941

8 жыл бұрын

CrimsonCorona10 The human brain is a classic computer, as far as many scientists know... If it has some quantum computing inside it, it's not very much and is mostly classic.

@cuahang3864

7 жыл бұрын

Marc Stinebaugh

@jamesfoote2022

6 жыл бұрын

Watch GoogleAI, I believe they have a great video on DODA and GO players being schooled by AI that only learned the game by playing itself...amazing, and so so very scary, it wont be too long before someone uses the AI to start killing people and then hiding itself and that is the part I don't like to think about.

the quantum "no cloning" rule excludes using entanglement for teleportation. You can not even sense a quantum particle much less "clone it" without altering it's spin, position or velocity. It just says that as soon as you have some confidence in the state of entangled particle A you can also have confidence in the state of entangled particle B. At least right after the point of entanglement. It's not "spooky action at a distance" It is spooky "confidence" at a distance, and the spooky part isn't even spooky. Plus the confidence part is only confident immediately after entanglement. It says nothing about the state of particle B after it's state has been quantum "erased" or disturbed by anything. Remember the math is a sketch of our understanding of reality. It is not reality itself. Our best wave equations are approximations for our understanding phenomena. It doesn't define the phenomena.

@kanchomaccarrone3632

5 жыл бұрын

What is gravity ?

@ryanalexander6943

4 жыл бұрын

Well said man

@jimlangill9318

2 жыл бұрын

@@kanchomaccarrone3632 My hypothesis is electromagnetism of dark matter.

Two roads diverged in a yellow wood, and I took them both, at the same time

@nishkaarora6343

8 жыл бұрын

HSHSHSHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAHHHAAHAHAHAH

@dcn1651

7 жыл бұрын

Until someone looked at you.

@briankelly8697

7 жыл бұрын

ed harley I'm laughing on the inside and out loud

@DJ4H4

7 жыл бұрын

That was true, till I looked at you Now claims of superposition, will only earn you derision But please don't hate, just 'cause I collapsed your state

@janicevanhorn618

7 жыл бұрын

Ed Harley LMAO Good one, Ed!!!!

Fantastic presentation - making something so wonderful and complicated available to general public to understand. And if the good Doctor K gets bored of physics, he could always become a Dave Grohl impersonator.

@crienospmoht

9 жыл бұрын

scots bhoy If Dave Grohl gets bored with music, he could become a Dr. K impersonator

@agingchill9012

8 жыл бұрын

eric t Dave Grohl and Dr. Kouwenhoven are entangled. Both melodize relativistically ;)

@markfoster1520

6 жыл бұрын

....and, theoretically, could transport to one another instantly. Just saying.

@kenkarish826

6 жыл бұрын

@scots bhoy, He did? Then maybe you can explain what he said to me....

@landonletterman831

5 жыл бұрын

scots bhoy I would hate to destroy the universe to prove multi-universe theory.... Think about it; Were I to *truely* endeavor to destroy all of space and time among all realities, would I not there-in (even if I was stopped, or failed countless times) not create a reality in which I succeeded? Even once completed, in one reality, destroys *ALL* of reality.... There's no stopping it!

Spooky quantum physics in the real world; putting on one glove is like having it on both hands.

@AverageAmerican

4 жыл бұрын

Yeah that's the spooky part!

@gregfridholm2136

4 жыл бұрын

LOL

@YakThaWiseman72

3 жыл бұрын

🤣🤣

@Mars-1995

3 жыл бұрын

He even touched it with both so...

@kevinbates919

2 жыл бұрын

Superb

When your professor is so ready to explore space, he keeps one latex glove on at all times.

@RuggedRoughneck

6 жыл бұрын

The Micheal Jackson of Quantum mechanics

If this is true, it should also be possible to transmit audio/visual data across the universe, instantly, regardless of distance. Exciting stuff.

"We know nothing." - Don Juan Matus

needs more equations

@bcat010

8 жыл бұрын

+ModestConfidence and more cowbell

@SniperLogic

7 жыл бұрын

ModestConfidence Definitely more cowbell. Would make it gooder.

@robertbritt6134

6 жыл бұрын

ModestConfidence dy of the on

@Kd5pet

6 жыл бұрын

Robert

@MidnightSt

6 жыл бұрын

needs 2x more gloves

I keep watching these physics videos hoping it will make me smarter some how, in the end I only feel dumber.

@littlehorn3401

4 жыл бұрын

Init

@shaggystone6397

4 жыл бұрын

The people giving the videos feel the same way but on a different level than the people watching them. Just as the people watching ( many) of these kinds of videos are on a different level than people who dont.

@YakThaWiseman72

3 жыл бұрын

🤣🤣

@mrloop1530

3 жыл бұрын

That's the spooky youtubing, right there.

Great Presentation Thank you for the information.... It is critically important for our world to work together & learn and do what we as a civialization must do and use to do.. Expand our thinking as all nations to learn and move forward peacefully..

What I want to know if entanglement has applicability in human relationships. That is, you interact with an individual for some period of time and then are physically distanced, do you maintain some of the characteristics (influence) of that individual, AND is entanglement something permanent or can entanglement between two molecules be discontinued? What would we want to do to discontinue entanglement?

How do we know the 2 entangled particles aren't actually 1 and the same particle in superposition?

@undertow8910

4 жыл бұрын

they are

@kevinbeazy

4 жыл бұрын

@FijneWIET They don’t. They talk like they’re experts but it’s all bs.

@IVANHOECHAPUT

3 жыл бұрын

In one of my books, Infinity, Time, Death and Thought, I explain that this is VERY close to what's actually happening.

"and i click once more.." Too much faith for me.

Have watched it before, but such an enjoyale, clear and so easy to understand presentation that I wanted to watch it again!

The first motion of self is being there. We had to complicate things to slow down or seemingly analouge movement. After all we had to build universe so we could all have a common ground to be. And having stuff stay where youput it is awsome.

It is likely many viewers will misunderstand when he says colour is conserved. There is no conservation of colour in the sense of the colour of your wallpaper. It might have been better talk about quantum spin as this is less likely to be confused with classical phenomena.

@unitedstatesofmordor

6 жыл бұрын

Those spin doctors just won't quit.

@Gunth0r

6 жыл бұрын

Spin goes more than "two ways" in the QM sense. So what's weird or confusing about a third color?

@justinland1208

6 жыл бұрын

beneehall American English color is spelled without the u.

This is kick ass stuff. One of the most amazing and far-reaching talks I have seen in many years. We will look back and wonder why we missed this one. I would love to hear more of the science underneath, but alas TED only allows 18 minutes...

i have used an equation to calculate area of a room. is have at budget. would you say that it was used correctly to multiply area by angle. the meet a deadline?

Nassim Haramein , this guy gives the best explanation of how to connect the quantum world and the world we live in from the molecule up to galaxies an the universe its self . He connects both worlds really smoothly , he is on you tube so anyone can find his work very easily .

What everyone is circumventing , is the entanglement phenomenon which essentially negates Einstein's theory of which one of the consequences is about the speed of light .I think we should keep our mind open about this absolute speed . Newtonian physics described everything that was there to describe in macroscopic level and then Einstein chipped in and proved that that is not the end of physics as we know it Maybe there is new theory waiting to be discovered over there

@firstlast-wg2on

8 жыл бұрын

+Steven Moore If you watched he said you can reproduce superposition in lots of different ways in controlled environments. So it's essentially been proven. +ravi kaul I see it as this, the speed of light is the max speed (as I've been told) that energy in whatever form it is in can travel, this quantum entanglement isn't the measurement of energy travelling across this state as it is simply saying that, two of the same object (exactly the same object*) cannot exist, and even though they're entangled, depending on how you interact with it later, certain properties can be restored from each atom. I'm no physicist, that's just how I see it with my own sense. *I mean like, exactly the same electrons and neutrons, because obviously there can be 2 gold or iron atoms for example, but they aren't made up of the exactly the same neutrons (not that there is variation of course).

@alexandrugheorghe5610

8 жыл бұрын

no it does not violate einstein's GR because you cannot send any *useful* information, so even if it does go faster than speed of light there is no room for causality there from the information point of view that is, you cannot send any message to the other particle

@jasonsmizer5431

5 жыл бұрын

manisha kaul you make a good point. The only things physicists can say for certain is they certainly havent discovered everything.

So a smart phone using a quantum computer will be giving me answers to questions I didn't ask even before I have one?

@1Howdy1

9 жыл бұрын

Nope, but it would do away with No Service areas and roaming charges. By the way - the answer is always no, so that could be programmed into your phone today.

@19501960

9 жыл бұрын

Maybe you'll be able to call another more advanced time and ask them for answers.

@ufoengines

9 жыл бұрын

Dee Em If there is anybody who need answers from and an advanced civilization from the future,.. it is I !

@randy-2247

9 жыл бұрын

ufoengines Send entangled particles into a wormhole, have a machine that has a camera on it. You can 'broadcast' through the particles. Woooh.

@randy-2247

9 жыл бұрын

Randy Hamilton oh my god! INSTANT INTERNET

in 5:26 "Sitting in the upper and lower arm at the very same time" It is true that when one observes the particle the superposition is canceled. So how did you determine the superposition?

@ryanalexander6943

4 жыл бұрын

Right? This stuff is so fascinating but even those that know the most about this subject seem to not know really anything about it or there's so much more they're not telling us

Good info!!! This is an invitation to see a theory on 'time' with an emergent uncertain future that gives us a new understanding of quantum mechanics.

It is a known fact now that entanglement causes things to happen instantaneously. That's why he used the expression faster than light it's instantaneous. You're 18 minutes might have been wasted for you, but the main message here is we are now going to get to quantum computers, realizing them as an actuality. That is fantastic, and TRUE news!

@CrimsonCorona10

8 жыл бұрын

Zack S Mitchell Well according to at least two companies, one called D-Wave Systems, they already have them.

@seandafny

8 жыл бұрын

What good will come of them

@whatzause

8 жыл бұрын

"What good or bad" is a different question. My answer is, I'm afraid BOTH.

@whatzause

7 жыл бұрын

D Patrick all I said was it's a fact. I did not make a value judgement. If you are asking a sincere question you may research it further.

@whatzause

7 жыл бұрын

D Patrick, Good point. It sounded like I was giving you permission. I should have said, "One can always research it if one desires, can't one?" and maybe you can still find a way to pick that apart and maybe not. (Too bad I have to mince words.)

The important thing here people is that THEY ARE NOW ABLE TO BRING QUANTUM EFFECTS TO THE HUMAN (EVERYDAY) LEVEL and manipulate it, that should induce an OMG type reaction if one considers the possibilities, c'mon, think about !

@michelearcher5482

6 жыл бұрын

Agreed!

@maruchannuudle657

5 жыл бұрын

They actually figured out how to teleport data 300 miles above earth but I haven’t dived into the story yet. I’m about to read up on it

8:00 yeah it makes sense since it is all and the same wave function W1 divided over 2 entities. But by measuring it you make it part of the measuring instrument (a macroscopic object) and it becomes altered as being a wave function W2. The wave function changed and from that moment on (from W1 to W2) the wave function all over the place is instantaneously altered giving the known outcome due to its connectedness.

Great lecture, but I have so many questions.... Where can I ask them?

I'm watching this video in 2019, and yes IBM announced the ''mobile'' quantum computer!

@johnvanzijl4657

5 жыл бұрын

The computer from IBM and Google are not really a Quantum, their usual qubits on the basis of superconductivity on a dead track. Leo Kouwenhoven of the TU Delft, discoverer of the majorana particle, Topological Majorana qubits are inherently more stable, because the information is not in the qubit itself, but in the order of the qubits.

Im going to stop falling asleep to these random ass videos. ... that damn sound catapulted me out of a deep sleep.

This really helped me understand, good job.

Due to some addictions ive had lost interest in everything, ive stopped my addictions and iam back watching and learing what iam supposed to watch and learn👀

@whirledpeas3477

2 жыл бұрын

You're not alone 💜

I always thought that the quantum would be accessible at larger human scales...just think of the human brain; it probably has quantum functionality and accessibility.

@maruchannuudle657

5 жыл бұрын

Jacob Nelson I like to think of the brain and its memories somehow might have some connection to that. Think about your childhood...now what did you eat last night... jumping from one memory from a different time instantaneously to something more related seems like there are quantum properties on how fast the human mind can travel through thoughts and memories. But may be far fetched I’m just speculated thought

@ericbremer6314

5 жыл бұрын

it probably already has.....

*Puts on glove to handle box. Touches box with ungloved hand* :P

@pebblebeach4868

7 жыл бұрын

Adam Weeks yeah, what was that all about ?

@589589589589589

6 жыл бұрын

it's not about contamination, it's for electrical protection. because there is always a voltage potential between different parts of your body (our muscles are activated by electrical current), isolating with a glove one point of contact eliminates the possibility of actually sending a charge thru the touched object. -imagine your hands being the terminals (+ and -) of a car battery. if ONE terminal is electrically isolated (either one), there is no current flow... -if you put tape on JUST ONE end of a AA battery, the flashlight won't work... you get the point.

@randolphpatterson5061

6 жыл бұрын

Puts on glove. Touchess box with bare hand. Six years later, some viewers are still unaware they got punked.

@jamesrogers2963

5 жыл бұрын

it's just grammatical - he meant "glove"...

@51516

5 жыл бұрын

He shoulda used a sparkly Michael Jackson glove.

I feel like this is going to be the only way to communicate for space missions in the future with no delay. Instantaneous communication no matter the distance? I don't know enough about it to know if it's possible to do this, but I'm sure someone will figure it out. Seems like a perfect solution.

I JUST G LOVED HIS DEMONSTRATION ! REALLY THUMBTHING AND HAVE TO HAND IT TO HIM BECAUSE HE NAILED IT ! BUT I STILL CAN'T FINGER IT OUT !

“If I put a glove on I can touch it” puts one glove on and touches with gloveless hand

We can't even find a cure for balding yet .

@dcn1651

7 жыл бұрын

All your hair went to another you in a parallel universe.

@oneminutefixed5003

7 жыл бұрын

sean J cause there are more interesting research to do :p but there would be a market for that, no doubt

@mezcel953

7 жыл бұрын

the hair is quantum teleportating, lol

@veridicusmaximus6010

7 жыл бұрын

It's a bad hair day when you have QHE - quantum hair entanglement.

@davidcunningham2984

7 жыл бұрын

bald is beautiful

Could we get a louder into paired with lower audio in the presentation please?

10:10 also this makes total sense since particle 1 and 2 are (after entanglement) one and the same particle then a 3rd particle interacting with one of the other 2 will change its wave function instantaneously. since the wave function is a mathematical description of a particle you changed the formula of the it instantaneously. It just alters state from state 1 to state 2 to state 3 and every interaction transforms its state. simple.Now in this way it SEEMS to contradict the speed of light but remember the particles (which can not travel faster) have already been separated with less then the speed of light speeds. Only the wave function connection is changed. And who claims that it is traveling higher then light speed. Maybe it is the opposing property that with-tracts or receeds itself from the measured particle (as a pulling back elastic band) so it seems to move faster then light but in reality it is not. And in its receeding from one particle it builds up at the same moment in the other particle (while it was present already there in the other particle to some extend), so it seems to go faster then light, due to measurement but it really is not. Who knows.

I think Einstein had right, there is no teleportation. Its just what you see in 3D is the pojection of the same object from 4D. Like you squezze a spring at the ends, when you release the spring both ends will relax not just one end, same thing with the particles. They are entagled like the ends of a spring, by potential energy, which is stored in the shape of the space they form, and there isn't any mysternious teleportatinon stuff going on or something like that. Really by usiing Occam's razor it must be just a wrap of spacetime like a spring. Although I can't prove it mathematically I think it's very likely to be that. BTW the next time I'd recommend you to have a glass of water beside you and drink from it meanwhile you speak, it will make wonders to your voice and prononciation I bet ya.

@thomson765

8 жыл бұрын

+John Aybier well... TUdelft has disproven Einsteins point this year. you should look it up!

@johnaybier418

8 жыл бұрын

Could you give me the link of the article please ?

@lohphat

8 жыл бұрын

+John Aybier Water won't help. Dutch is a congenital throat irritation. ;-)

@lohphat

8 жыл бұрын

+John Aybier Here it is I think: phys.org/news/2015-08-loopholes-entanglement-bell-inequality.html

@borgholable

8 жыл бұрын

+John Aybier considering it takes alot of mass/gravity to bend space/time , i dont think two particles would be able to do that , however if that is indeed what happens then it would still be true , those scientists never claimed anything travels than the speed of light because nothing does , it is just the concept that when two particles become entangled then according to you the distance becomes much shorter due to bending and then information would still travel at the speed of light except in a much shorter distance than it use to , so the speed of light is still a constant limit that did not change

Good stuff, I want more!

He put me to sleep effectively - I slept in between the talk - woke up and continued

this whole entanglement thing really blows the mind ..... well , all of quantum physics blows my mind by this subject in particular , and what i would love to understand is how do scientist actually do these experiments exactly ? for intense how do they measure those particles that become entangled ? considering that information speed limit is the speed of light then how is it possible for them to know that this act is instant ?

@snoozieboi

8 жыл бұрын

One way scientists did it was to measure "spin" of two entangled particles. Let's say they spun one rotation per second and were tennis balls. They placed the two particles on both sides of a valley several kilometers wide. Then they put a laser might going from one to the other. If the rotation changed in one the laser would reveal it work the speed of light. What they noticed was that if they made one tennisball start rotating the other way, the entangled tennisball/particle far away suddenly started rotating the other way too, BEFORE the laser beam had changed. Note this laser beam kinda showed the shadow of both. And both tennisballs changed direction of spin at the SAME time. Nothing should move faster than light, but this type of experiments show "information about the rotation of these tennisballs /particles" goes faster than light.

@george1703

8 жыл бұрын

+snoozieboi I don't understand how they are entangled, does this mean if you touch the two balls? What exactly is the way they are entangled? If I were to have two tennis balls and spun one the other will not spin, the same if I touch them first. If I melt them together and then separate them they still will not spin together. Please explain in a simple way if that is possible. From the time I was a small boy I always felt, I can't explain what I mean by felt, that no two objects can ever touch each other so entanglement would not be possible either. Does that make any sense? Maybe I just have no clue. The probability of that is very high.

@snoozieboi

8 жыл бұрын

I think the "colour" stuff here is just a simplification, I would check out more videos about spin and entanglement. It's weird and I grasp just as little as you, I'm just amused by trying to wrap my head around this from time to time. I'd also search about the "double slit experiment" as it is equally fun.

@toniwalter2911

8 жыл бұрын

+George Foster i think 'they are entangled' is just the scientists saying "they share information" or something, basically some sort of connection we don't understand verry well by now

@varonkc

8 жыл бұрын

+hisham borgol They do it all in computers and none of it is real. They're laughing all the way to the bank.

Entanglement...So...if you accept the current view of the birth and early history of this universe it would seem to me that all particles are, and always have been entangled. I'm no expert though. Anyone care to comment ?

@juliusfucik4011

7 жыл бұрын

This was exactly my thought. This would imply that changing or measuring the state of any particle will change the state of any other particle in the universe.

@vidxs

5 жыл бұрын

@@juliusfucik4011 this is that guy Heisenberg , study him and how you perceive reality now is altered from it. Red object? you think you see red? but fact is its the absence of red, we see refracted light, we determined red because we see all of the light excluding red light which was absorbed by the red object. time is the true function here its all in the math.

99% of reality occurs beyond our human senses.

@jimlangill9318

2 жыл бұрын

I think it's more like 99.999

Interesting stuff,I sort of understand the theory behind quantum entanglement now..ish. The more you study this stuff the more you understand so why do we still have things happening with algorithms that we cannot understand,like for example a book that was selling for $1.5 million and then a day later it cost $25 million. Why was that,does entanglement have something to do with it? Does entanglement have any connection with algorithms even?

I don't know if partial differential equations are "simple"... But definitely useful! Thank you!!!

I can't believe I live in a time where I'm not foraging for food or shelter and I have time to learn.

@Lucifer-ut4jd

8 жыл бұрын

you maybe, but what about billions of others basically enslaved to keep you supplied with cheap shit? what point is your learning when you do nothing for the world? disgusting

@kalebbelanak4004

8 жыл бұрын

Lucifer I believe there are other slaves to captialism. But learning is just someting to do to keep your ego occupied. Learning is like sports, traveling, drink or drugs ect everyone has there likes and dislikes. I am not a physics gut but i like to learn about philosphy, culture and botany. I have a fun time doing so. But our lifes would be fine without it. All our race truly need in live is water, shelter, food and sex for reproduction. But the enslaved ones are enslaved to their egos desires.

@Lucifer-ut4jd

8 жыл бұрын

Kaleb Belanak preaching to the choir ;)

@TheVocoderGuy

8 жыл бұрын

+Lucifer you're right, what are you doing here?

@ChristophKustler

8 жыл бұрын

+TheVocoderGuy You better don't believe it. We may be foraging for food and shelter sooner than we think.

if reality was a virtual world, a computer program, a hologram, and the speed of light is the relative speed limit. wouldnt quantum entanglement be viewed as a kind of back door program that only allows the information for the entangled particle to be the observed property. thus meaning that a program needs to be able to render what is being observed at a speed beyond the rate of the simulations being run. lines of code to generate the rendering comes from a main server, to provide definite position in space and time etc. while the simulation itself is played on the personal computer/ individuals mind.

@randy-2247

9 жыл бұрын

smackout ram.

@ShutterGuts

9 жыл бұрын

smackout It means that time is relative. Quantum entanglement doesn't use "our" time in this dimension..

You know, *_I_* created a Quantum Goliath. It was six qubits and a span. :D Thanks for the video! Rikki Tikki.

I love quantum physics. Thanks for sharing.

This can be a very interesting period of discovery... superluminal communications is not only a reality, it is possible with our current stone age technology. He's shown that quantum bits can be entangled, separated, and captured. They can then be individually manipulated, allowing experimenters to examine the results on the other bit at some distance... Now, take three sets of quantum entangled bits that have had no interaction with one another. Three go into chamber A, three go into chamber B. In chamber A something is used to manipulate the bits. In chamber B a device is there to read any changes. Do this in a building, then across a city, then across a country, and then on the moon... and maybe eventually Mars. Depending on how fast the bits can be manipulated (very, I assume) means that instantaneous delivery of vast amounts of information could be transferred between two vastly separated points by this method. 'Teleportation' of mass, I suspect, will never truly be possible (due to the insane numbers of quanta involved to 'assemble' an object of any mass, much less a person). But... ever have DejaVu? A memory that was not yours? Perhaps, maybe, a quantum bit in someone's brain, somewhere far away - in a galaxy far, far away - perhaps even in a different point of an entirely different time stream is also in some neuron somewhere in your conscious brain... and the two began communicating, for a time, until one or the other drifted off to do whatever it is that free ranging quantum bits do.

This is starting to sound suspiciously like that Schrödinger's cat paradox. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to see that matter in our world is connected at a level we cannot perceive. I have long suspected that the unexplained forces like gravity and time are exerting their forces from outside our own dimension where things like distance and time become meaningless.

@johnrockett5155

6 жыл бұрын

This is exactly Schrödingers cat .. that's the point of the experiment to explain superpositions

Great job Leo, fascinating

Why did he put the glove? Whats the point of the box? I want to know!!

how can so many smart people focus on the glove, when he just postulated that some event can travel instantaneously over astronomical distances?

@kanchomaccarrone3632

5 жыл бұрын

Because All existence is singularity not duality as is assumed

@rottnlove

5 жыл бұрын

Because if he can't make sense out of things that we can see, how does he expect us to believe things we cannot see? I don't know about anybody else but I didn't see the device that he required the glove for actually do anyting, just PowerPoint slides changing colors of circles and a video of a fiber optic light

I didn't know Dave Grohl was so intelectually prepared

@robertroberts5627

4 жыл бұрын

Moukazaru Gen2010 He can sure drive out some great guitar licks. A multitalented man :)

@vinodkumaraug

3 жыл бұрын

FAIL

many thanks for share this science research.keep going

thanks for the info, Mr. Trotsky....

2spooky4me

His buddy wanted him to wear gloves.. he kept touching the box without his gloved hand!!!

You talk about teleportation of the information in your entanglement experiment . But does this mean it's instantaneous ? Let say it's superluminal , due to the modus operandi of your experiment , is there a minimum value of speed over which you call the transfer instantaneous ( 10c , 100c , whatever ) ?

This is the best Phish show I've ever seen.

It seems to me, that entanglement and interference prove that our World is not physical but rather 'informational' - i.e. organized energy patterns.

@ankhenaten2

8 жыл бұрын

what is energy made of? everything must have building blocks. ..ad infinite

@eltouristoduo

8 жыл бұрын

It's too soon to know what we can know. If we don't destroy ourselves or regress, or giant asteroid, etc, we will continue to gain knowledge. What we can't know yet is that a unified understanding may be a finite thing. I don't really agree that the building of that knowledge will occur at some exponential rate, because maybe the discoveries are more elusive like that also. Of course you and I are unlikely to be around to find out. Which is perhaps my biggest issue with mortality. If we already had all those answers, I'd feel like I got to see the end of that movie. (presuming it's a finite set of knowledge). I don't buy the ever-smaller 'particle' theory (for sure) any more than the logic that say's I should never be able to cross a room. But yeah all the quantum stuff is a hoot. Can't wait for more...

@MetalMonkey9

8 жыл бұрын

+eltouristoduo some, like Ray Kurzweil challenge the view that we will never know everything. Dodging the dangers to our species and planet that you have outlined, we could become augmented beings, or an emerging AI could become a 'hacker' of the Universe. It's a wild hypothesis. For your undying desire, Ted Urban explored this concept with some enlightenment on his blog 'Wait but why'. It's quite a fascinating idea. Back to your point that we can't know everything; in his Ted talk 'Why is our Universe fine-tuned for life', Brian Greene makes a great exposure that on a cosmological timescale, conscious beings might actually get to know less about their universe. A saddening perspective.The greatest flaw of science is that it is limited to observations, and our greatest flaw is that our observations are limited by our brains...

@MrCoffis

7 жыл бұрын

+Steven Moore and 0 divided by 0 is everything.

@pureenergy5051

6 жыл бұрын

Mathieu Landry That is right ! Holographic it is. Have you read the book "Hands of Light" written by the NASA physicist Barbara Brennan? She sees people as holograms--organized energy patterns.. Read this book "The Quantum World" by the physicist Ford. Here are some words: 'magically bursting forth are quarks spinning billions of times a second as 3 points of light, forming what are called protons and neutrons.' Entanglement and interference is what waves do. Points of light are always beaming waves of light. These intersect constantly. These are consciousness itself. When my waves intersect your waves, telepathy happens.

3.37 front row, 3rd from left, Gordon Ramsay.

@toddval5453

7 жыл бұрын

half life 3 confirmed

@corvuscoronoides

7 жыл бұрын

3:37 back row, 4th from left- satan

@topcat8804

7 жыл бұрын

That's Marie Curie. I'll leave it to you to tell him.

@NinjaOutfitInTheWash

6 жыл бұрын

steven halliday you have too much time on your hands

@E-Kat

6 жыл бұрын

steven halliday Gordon who??

What if entangled particule are actually inside a "Wormhole". The wormhole brings to different point in spaces time nearby. So entangles particules are actually each other's worm hole and when you test one, you break the quantum superposition of one particules. So one has a propriety and the other as an entangled state. Which make exemple, energy disapear or appear. (Basicly , the red one and the white one have a different energy let's say R(Red) have 20u(unity of something) and W(White) have 10u, then, entangled mean they'd have 15u each and 30u togheter, if one isn't in superposition, it would make 15 u one and 20or10 u the other so 25u/35u together so 5u would appear or disapear if you change one and the other isn't changed and because particules and their negative version mass and charge appear and disapear at the same time( So the energy of the combined universe stay the same.) Well, either, a particules would appear at the still entangled one to put it in balance or a particules would pass through a wormholes to get to the other's position in a lesser distance so it doesn't go faster then c

when he talks about "particles" in entanglement what exactly are these particles?

Modern physicists remind me of the three blindfolded men examining an elephant.

@figueiralex

8 жыл бұрын

Stop using your computer then... it is based on modern physics.

@lewisallrightsreserved7879

6 жыл бұрын

"I once shot an elephant wearing a Leica in my pajamas, how he could afford the Leica I'll never know"... -Orange Julius Groucho Marx Lennon & McCartney Attorneys at Flaw

@Dude-Smellmyhelmet

6 жыл бұрын

TheFritz423 A wall, a something? And a snake.... I forget the second guys conclusion

@misguidedsaint3693

6 жыл бұрын

Trail Work a tree trunk I think

@TaiFerret

6 жыл бұрын

Alexandre Figueira Well, whatever kind of physics our computers are based on, it seems to work.

I am still waiting for these guys to take a few hours off and create a filler for pot holes that will last decades and not months. Should not pose that hard of a challenge for these mental giants.

@Aluminata

8 жыл бұрын

+JIMJAMSC You would then find you had roads with anti potholes every where.

@marcosrodriguez2496

8 жыл бұрын

+JIMJAMSC we don't need those geniuses to waste their time on potholes. imagine potholes that last forever, there would be no more jobs for people like you. ;-)

@JIMJAMSC

8 жыл бұрын

+Marcos Rodriguez Hahaha not bad... Had my career in aviation failed and I needed to a job, I am not above ,"gulp...." manual labor.

@joelee5875

7 жыл бұрын

"We" have those fillers they're just not practical.

@eachus

5 жыл бұрын

The problem is not in finding a pot hole filler that will last for years, the problem is that, especially in cold weather, the pot hole keeps growing. Soon you have cold patch in the bottom of a bigger pot hole. The solution is to, when the road surface is warm (in other words during summer) wash away any sand, and spray hot oil. Do it on a regular schedule based on road use and weather, and no pot holes! Why do politicians try to get "one more year" out of a road surface? That is a political problem. Some towns and cities do it right, the rest have politicians who think they know more than the civil engineers. The problem is usually not in the DPW, but someone who finds "better" uses for the DPWs summer maintenance budget. By the time the pot holes show up the cost to fix the problem is much, much higher--and it can't be done during freeze/thaw cycles.

See, that's the amazing thing about life and reality as we know it. We would assume that we have 100% knowledge about everything smaller than ourselves, yet we have limited information and we are just figuring it out as we progress - even though, we are literally made out of those elements in a first place! Let that sink in for a moment. So it's kind off funny to see people go " Oh i never understood that not my topic " Yea you don't have to understand it - BUT IT WORKS! that's just amazing in my opinion. The very things that make you " YOU " you don't even understand unless you dig deep. That's the beauty of exploration, finding out about the very foundation of elements everything is made off, ends up us figuring out the Universe itself.

I feel like much has changed in this field in the last 7 years.

It is really hard to believe that everything is possible. It's just probalities and no matter how small they are gonna be in our universe it will happen. The probality that in 2 minutes there will be a Koenigsegg Regera in my room is ridiculous small. Just one electron of a car in Sweden in my room now would be a so random and unlikely event that no human ever will watch this, but not for sure. It could be. And if youre waiting long enough you'll get there and have your car. Because of the entropy it could happen and we could observe the event. I want to say that's nothing is for sure they arent 100% or 0% of anything. The phrase nothing goes faster than light is not true. The speed of light is variable and with the quantum tunnelling can go as fast as you like (maybe). And that's our whole life and existence. Its just random, just some entropy. It's just a coincidence nothing more. And that's why there so many events predicted that could efface all of us like a asteroid or a gamma burst. Because everything can happen. The only control you have about your existence is some changes to the probalities what could happen to your system. And you make that with energy. Energy is a time saver. It is the only way to reduce the entropy in your area. And energy is literally time saving. For example if you fall a black hole you would get beamed 10^50 years in the future. So long could your life be! Of course after that you will be just some photons but with a tiny tiny probality you survive the dying of a black hole. With energy you set some probalities, just you give the ball some energy to make sure that it will go a specific way. So more energy is at a place something unlikely wont happen with a high probality. And something like a ball has a lot of energy (E=mc^2). I think even at something like a ball you can see and feel the relativistic effects. Just imagine the ball in a thick box who nobody can see what is inside. The probality that the ball will be gone and destroyed is so small that it would take as the time as a tiny black hole needs to get destroyed. And that is because of the mass of energy the ball has. It distorted the time of the events (or say spacetime) in a extreme way for the scale of quantum mechanics. And in my opinion that's the link between theory of relativity and quantum mechanics. If youre reading for real than boy oh boy you have a lot of time. Thanks for spending it to my shitty english and my superficial knowledge.

@ronaldderooij1774

7 жыл бұрын

What you say is true (for the most part), but I would advise not to dwell on it too often. You and I live in a classical world. There is very little quantum about it (yet).

@Richard_allrich

7 жыл бұрын

Ronald de Rooij​​ Our brains reduce our quantum world a lot. Only to a little fraction called causality but the mechanical one. We only aiming for some higher dopamine levels and that's what most creatures do. We're just spreading our genes with no clues how much random and quantum mechanics influence your genes or your body. Cancer is a coincidence, for example. Will you get it? You can't know. But you can set the probalities in a way, that it will be unlikely (don't smoke, drink alcohol, beacon,....). The point is that the quantum world can be observabled by us. All the "random" and common things are based on quantum mechanics. But it is literally to complex for our brains so that you won't normally think in the right way according to quantum mechanics. But when you see someone who wins at poker all the time then you have someone, who can set the probalities pretty well. And the hard work to learn all of the possible situations consumed a lot of energy and time. So according to my thoughts, the extreme things which are going on on a quantum and relatively squale are pretty real and the quantum world easily can competing with the classical one.

@josephfitzpatrick4019

7 жыл бұрын

Richard Alrich Hmm everything is a probability because everything can exsist as a wave function. But because of decoherence it is just not really relevant to our day to day lives. You said the speed of light is a variable do you mean by what medium it is traveling through?

@Richard_allrich

7 жыл бұрын

Joseph Fitzpatrick​ But our daily lives are the outcomes of the wave functions! The probability that youre reading this right now is pretty high. But I can not say it for sure. I can only know when I look it up and destroy the wave function. Your answer will make this. And yeah I mean the speed of light in variable mediums. But in the universe you will ever have a medium in the way so the speed of the quants are variabel. And with quantum mechanics you can send things faster than the speed of light in vaccum.

@josephfitzpatrick4019

7 жыл бұрын

Richard Alrich Yes agreed but the amount of possibilities is far to much to comprahend so when you account for every change in possible out come that could be due to collapsing the wave function of every single particle that makes up an event in reality and all the different possible locations of the particles could be when you collapse the wave function that make up all the different events in reality, then what are we really talking about? Just maths really because can these events really determine a reality or would there be a break down a long the way? my thoughts listen from others and thinking is that all these events do happen, parrallel universe or what ever you choose to believe

"I'm gonna build a wall around the white particle, and it's gonna be a great wall! This way the colored particles can stop coming over and affecting the white particles." Trump 2016!

@Stinger430

8 жыл бұрын

hahahaha...classic.

@GarciaDK

8 жыл бұрын

Stinger430 lol Couldn't help myself.

@NiceG

7 жыл бұрын

Good, so the american particles wont be able to escape when karma is comming.. because karma is comming.

@NiceG

7 жыл бұрын

+T Bone Capone slave, dont talk to me like that. how dare you!? i dont work like that.. ask your mother, she is well known for that kind of activity.

@onyxtay7246

7 жыл бұрын

What exactly has america done to the rest of the world. You know. Besides helping out countries after natural disasters, incredible advances in science and technology, ending WWII, and advancing education. I'm just curious.

Simultaneous transmission of information over long distances, (as far as the size of the universe,) how about through time simultaneously?

So.....What happens if you color measure one particle at 60Hz and then move the particle at relativistic speeds? Does the non-relativistically moving particle change properties faster than 60Hz?

feels like not much was said.

@garetclaborn1399

8 жыл бұрын

craig listly I agree with what Kurtis mentions. Adding to the devices that fall under computer, imagine that your home internet router has entangled pairs with a data center, which in turn has entangled connections with most major human data centers. This can reduce the space required for electrons or light signals to travel from thousands of kilometers to under a meter. Your ping will be less than a millisecond to anywhere in the world. I cannot be entirely sure, but I think the speaker is strongly alluding to advances in the technology to mass produce devices that work on these phenomena. It has been thought too expensive and complex to become a reality by many but those walls have been breaking down over these latest decades.

@craiglistly8210

8 жыл бұрын

just as i said not much was said

@craiglistly8210

8 жыл бұрын

funny how you resort to insults when all I stated was my opinion like somehow that's a crime. But anyways I never said I didn't get it that's an assumption made on your part.

@craiglistly8210

8 жыл бұрын

Yes insults you don't know me and yet you speak ill of me with absolutely nothing to support what your saying. It would be like me calling you stupid, the only purpose would simply to provoke you but the statement itself wouldn't be valid because i know nothing about you. But anyways you just seem to be looking for someone to vent your frustrations on so I won;t write to you anymore. Your a rude person and I'll have nothing to do with you good day.

@CrimsonCorona10

8 жыл бұрын

craig listly Based on your words, and the fact that you repeated them, have you known the possibilities of the principles and theories he presented in this talk? Or would you have been more impressed if he could quantum superposition someones thoughts or teleport large objects?

The incredible mind of, God ☺

5:00 what if you put a block in one of the two paths?

what if you observe them at the exact same time?

A Bad way to teach physic. It makes it feel like magic without clear explanations or worst, without intuition nor curiosity. Of course, it's just my opinion

@samsung32901

7 жыл бұрын

felipe blin agreed

@ronaldderooij1774

7 жыл бұрын

Teaching physics was not the message here. The message was, "expect revolutions in technolgy because of quantum because we finally succeeded to make available quantim physics in the macro world".

@das250250

7 жыл бұрын

felipe blin its just a teaser of work that is complex into a digestible chunk. To teach it requires many steps

@Dude-Smellmyhelmet

6 жыл бұрын

felipe blin LOL. teach physics.... in 20 minutes.

@Bottlekap

5 жыл бұрын

To be fair, ted talks are not meant for that. They are meant to turn the basics into digestible information. Besides, especially with quantum mechanics... to most people, especially those with zero knowledge of it at all, a lot of the basic fundamentals really do start out as fantastical and magical. It’s normally entirely counter intuitive to how most people observe the physical world. A ted talk is not meant to show the mathematical or technical data that explains or proves its existence. Like I said earlier, it’s to provide a jumping off point for people normally far away from these fields of research. Also, I find it deeply amusing because his little bit during his intro of him half joking about being told that for each equation or formula you display, you lose half your audience. Your comment is addressed by that joke directly lol, that’s his way of saying this isn’t a technical presentation and it’s not supposed to be.

i listened, and i am smart, but i lose interest - thus because it's meaningless

Wait, whatever happened to the cube things? I thought he was supposed to demonstrate something with them🤔 Now im even more confused than 18 minutes ago.

i understand quite a bit...i have used quantum entanglement extensively in a series of love poems....i find it immensely romantic...

2:49, it's utterly mind-blowing how someone can be so highly intelligent...and STILL not know the proper use of the apostrophe. it's "neutrinos", man....not "neutrino's". 3rd grade grammar, homie... =/

@tomsucksatpiano

7 жыл бұрын

What if he just doesn't really care just like you obviously don't really care about your misuse of ellipses

@iambiggus

7 жыл бұрын

Your hyphen in mind blowing is unnecessary and improper grammar. You only apply a hyphen to a compound adjective when it precedes the term it modifies, or could otherwise be misread. 7th grade grammar.

@geometryplus2435

7 жыл бұрын

he's not native English speaker, plus there are more important things on his mind than grammar :D

@davedevosbaarle

7 жыл бұрын

In English it's the spelling for the genitive of neutrino. In Dutch it's the speling for the plural of neutrino. This type of spelling mistake is fairly common for Dutch people writing English. Not mind blowing, I'd say.

@iambiggus

7 жыл бұрын

***** Sure sure, but it's fun to correct someone as they correct someone.

Didn't learn a thing.

@oneminutefixed5003

7 жыл бұрын

William Baker not even the concepts? Or were you already aware of spooky physics?

@Vitor.Machado

7 жыл бұрын

his explanation was really confusing. I know about "spooky physics" . ive watched other videos and thsi guy really made it confusing...

@JohnFHendry

7 жыл бұрын

Yes... the real answer shows it takes the time and space of two Mass oscillations to create one observed C/G in 3D... simple compared to using dice and imaginary particles...etc. So many smart people... saying Einstein was wrong and they know better... barf. The E158 ratio that fixes it was not known until 2003 thanks to SLAC's E158 team.

@SniperLogic

7 жыл бұрын

John F Hendry Do what? :-)

@Bottlekap

5 жыл бұрын

There was literally nothing confusing about this presentation... how are so many people apparently letting this whole thing fly clear over their heads????

was this the beginning of quantum computers? Like first time showing to a public?

13:06 that Sound produced by an electrons is so creepy and ghostly and at the same time sound so familiar.

@ryanalexander6943

4 жыл бұрын

Ya, it sounds like police sirens lol

While the topic is interesting, this presentation was truly, truly terrible. There are simpler examples, and more concrete ways of explaining concepts like entanglement; I only wish that someone like Leo (who is an expert in the field) could present the information more linearly, logically, and clearly.

@nileshparab7971

8 жыл бұрын

True...

@ChristophKustler

8 жыл бұрын

+Jason Cochran Agreed. Presenting scientific topics to the broad public is an art of its own. That's why people like Carl Sagan, Richard Dawkins, Lawrence Krauss, Michio Kaku, etc.. are famous, like rockstars. I also admit, that I didn't understand a thing of what he said, and that the whole presentation was boring, despite of my interest in this topic.

@ChristophKustler

8 жыл бұрын

+Steven Moore It says: "... despite of my interest in this topic."

@truthsocialmedia

7 жыл бұрын

the guy is a fricking german speaker, and probably speaks german 95% of the time, cut him some slack for christ sakes

@E-Kat

6 жыл бұрын

So why were you watching this if you know it all already? Make a video and post it for us!

He brought out a bunch of random objects. Where was a relevant demonstration? This was an absurd presentation. The only thing eye-opening was the third particle entanglement. This video is WAY over rated.

"Let me put a glove on so I can touch the box." *proceeds to touch box with ungloved hand

I when he said "this one turns green, a little bit", lol good ted talk tho!!

I want my 18 minutes of life back. Just many words without really telling anything. That teleportation of the "green color" looks suspicious to me. Because it's known "scientific fact" that quantum behavior cannot be used to transfer information at speeds exceeding speed of light. But with that "green color teleportation" you can do that. Something's fishy there. Either he's lying or he's just using bad example because he doesn't want to tell us what they're really doing. I'm not buying that.

@o15523

9 жыл бұрын

kasuha "scientific theory" tells us it's not possible. but that is an old theory. we have discovered that it is possible and it indeed does happen. you need to research quantum entanglement.

@kasuha

9 жыл бұрын

Bryan Tuck Well, show me their nobel prizes they must have acquired if it really works. FTL communication would definitely overshadow even Higgs boson. But I'm not aware they got any over four years that passed since this promotion. Sorry, I don't buy it. And don't worry, I know a lot about quantum entanglement.

@kasuha

9 жыл бұрын

***** Well he says that entangling the entangled particle with the "green" particle makes the other entangled particel also "green". Immediately. And by measuring "greenness" of that particle I can immediately know if it was or wasn't entangled, even if I was 10 light years away. I call that FTL communication. Or he's just, you know, cheating us with bad examples.

@kasuha

9 жыл бұрын

***** There's nothing new or fascinating on what you describe. Quantum entanglement was known when Einstein was still alive and its principles are understood for good fifty years. This talk is a badly prepared, badly executed self-promotion of a group of students playing with quantum entanglement toys. I don't think that's the intended purpose of these talks. And putting that bunch beside the photo of people standing behind our understanding of physics and suggesting they're equal is just pathetic.

@kasuha

9 жыл бұрын

Let's wrap it up: I stand by my initial review, watching this video is waste of time. You may even learn things anout quantum entanglement that are not true.

Is there a rule at TED that every speaker has to work in some feminist claptrap every presentation?

@HrSamstag

7 жыл бұрын

Indeed it seems to be some "one world", "we're all equal", "feel good" - altruistic sectarianism drive somewhere in the back office working there. You're not the first who is mentioning. Just google "TEDx sect" and you'll immediately find some articles regarding this.

@HrSamstag

7 жыл бұрын

You might also be interested in this: youtu be/4JhwQ17mLjo

@georgeiscooking.1152

5 жыл бұрын

Yes actually there is!

Why use the Rutherfold model of the atom?

DELFT ? How do you pronounce three consonants in a row without a vowel in between? By teleportation.