Part 2: kzread.info/dash/bejne/oYOc15SEpNqafqg.html Buy the Limited Edition Poster: usefulcharts.com/products/limited-edition-carolingian-family-tree

@imakeboringcontent7277

2 жыл бұрын

Do ship world wide

@benbrawler2583

2 жыл бұрын

I think i will get one Edit: i got one

@SuperStriker7US

2 жыл бұрын

amogus

@bosniencommie1202

2 жыл бұрын

cen you do whu is most senior heir of sultans of al andalus todey and kings of bosnia todey

@amazingfincher

2 жыл бұрын

Why isn't he called Karl the Great in English? :D

Your video inspired me to look up why "Charles the Simple" had such an unflattering name. In that time, "Simple" meant direct or straightforward, without the hint of being feeble-minded.

@cumaproto9466

2 жыл бұрын

Charles the simp

@TheWatcher5292

2 жыл бұрын

@@cumaproto9466 Charles the

@tonijelecevic9238

2 жыл бұрын

Better than being called "the bald" or "the fat" lol

@patrick40592

2 жыл бұрын

What bout charles the fat

@evangel_io9007

2 жыл бұрын

@@patrick40592 funnily enough, no one during the time called him charles the fat. He was only called that hundreds of years after his death by geneologists.

UK: abolishes the monarchy The queen: *moves to continental Western Europe and reestablishes the Frankish Empire*

@highmanbeing1591

2 жыл бұрын

side note: she is about to resign and Charles will be King effectively. They have it all within their grip and always have. shit.

@LunaNicoleTheFox

2 жыл бұрын

@@highmanbeing1591 The queen will not resign.

@highmanbeing1591

2 жыл бұрын

@@LunaNicoleTheFox lets see :)

@kearo299

2 жыл бұрын

Empress Matilda would be proud of her 💂

@tathemrelag3123

2 жыл бұрын

Also, monarchs don't "resign." It's called "abdicating."

So who's going to tell King Charles he's the Carolingian Emperor?

@ems4884

5 ай бұрын

He definitely already knows every single line he's potentially or certainly connected to.

@amylathrop8329

4 ай бұрын

Darling, he knows. If there's any one thing today's Monarchs know is their entire ancestry.

@TheToughBaby

2 ай бұрын

@@amylathrop8329 I expect he looks at a chart almost exactly like this every morning when he wakes up

I have Charlemagne in my blood line through Charles the Simple, so I'm just here to find out who wants to help me uh... reclaim my family heritage "peacefully" and who needs to "step-aside."

@jguillermooliver

Жыл бұрын

We all have Charlemagne in our blood, if you have european descendants in your blodline.

@17Watman

Жыл бұрын

Same here

@ollikoskiniemi6221

Жыл бұрын

You'd need to "peacefully" convince like tens of thousands of people to "step-aside". Anyways I'm in, sounds like something that should be televised, let's call it the "royal olympics", or "game of THE throne", or "right by might"

@charity2275

Жыл бұрын

@@jguillermooliver Not true. There were plenty of peasants.

@michaelwright6726

Жыл бұрын

I am also descendant of Charlemagne as l am the 18th great grandsons of King Charles VI ("the mad") of France on my mother side of the family...

What a fun thought experiment! Once we got to the House of Wettin I had a feeling I knew where this was gonna end. Congrats on 1 million!

@jasonpickering5288

2 жыл бұрын

After we got to the Dukes of Saxony I finally clued in.

@davidozab2753

2 жыл бұрын

Elizabeth II: I am inevitable.

@ByzantineDarkwraith

2 жыл бұрын

As someone who's gone to Elizabeth II's wikipedia page and just clicked "Father" in the infobox over and over and over again before, as soon as we got to the house of Wettin I had that feeling too :)

@keithharper32

2 жыл бұрын

You're more knowledgible than me then. I thought when we got to the House of Wettin we'd wind up on the pretenders of Poland-Lithuania

@cv4809

2 жыл бұрын

@@ByzantineDarkwraith So I'm not the only one then I did that for every current european royal house and the House of Welf was the oldest I could track

Previously I guessed it would end up with a stranger in Australia or the US, but the actual result is surprising and much more interesting 😀

@unrealuknow864

2 жыл бұрын

The legitimate King of England lived in Australia. His daughter should be Queen.

@ChomoBidensMules

2 жыл бұрын

King Ralph

@matteusconnollius1203

2 жыл бұрын

No, that arguement is meaningless since Elizabeth's ancestor, Henry VII took the throne by right of conqeust

@eternalvigilance5697

2 жыл бұрын

@@matteusconnollius1203 Stole*

@matteusconnollius1203

2 жыл бұрын

@@eternalvigilance5697 Do you think a deity came down and gave King Richard his seal of approval for the throne? Nobody has anybody right to the throne except by being able to use strength to ocnquer it and having the support of people. "Stealing" thrones are meaningless, conquests is how people get thrones anyway

Minor correction: Charlemagne's wife, Hildegard of the Vinzgau, has not been canonised, only beatified. Accordingly, she is (if anything) Blessed Hildegard, not Saint Hildegard. The latter generally refers to Saint Hildegard of Bingen, a mystic nun.

@mandyb8675

3 ай бұрын

Yeah I just noticed that.

@Jerown

2 ай бұрын

this is why I mostly dont trust these charts. they are fun thought experiments but ultimatly this person isnt a historian. The lines that often get drawn in these family trees are sketchy aswell...

@florian8599

2 ай бұрын

Bl. Hildegard is more applicable, because she was _regionally_ venerated around Kempten -- a monastery she founded.

@Jiub_SN

2 ай бұрын

@@Jerownthis is more or less accurate

After the recent death of Queen Elizabeth II, her son Charles becomes King Charles III of Great Britain and his reign will be know as the Carolean period, similar to his ancestor Charlemage. Who according to your research, Charles III is his most senior living descendant. How absolutely fascinating, that after all these centuries the fruit hasn't fallen far from the tree.

@fishnchips8132

Жыл бұрын

Charlie has said himself that he is descended from Vlad the Impaler - having looked into his & the family's behaviour & history - that's when one can say, the apple does not fall far from the tree - Research the royal families of Europe will bring a much more balanced truth.

@frank-ko6de

Жыл бұрын

It fell a long from the tree. From Germany all the way to England.

@johnbrereton5229

Жыл бұрын

@@frank-ko6de Charlemagne was not German ?????? I'm talking about King Charles III family tree. Which goes back to Charlemagne King of the Frank's who later became the French. However, Charlemagne was born in Leige in modern day Belgium, so not that far away and not Germany.

@frank-ko6de

Жыл бұрын

@@johnbrereton5229 Actually very far away and through so many centuries and millions of people. It's not direct.👍👍👍👍

@johnbrereton5229

Жыл бұрын

@@frank-ko6de All our ancestors go back through millions of people through many centuries but they still lead directly to their descendants.

We did it boys, we have Charlemagne back to the throne!

@bartsanders1553

2 ай бұрын

We finally beat Crusader Kings!

Mind is blown and now he is King. Crazy

I'm going to become a history teacher soon, and when I do. I am going to have your charts in my room. I think that they are a truly great resource for learning and putting history into perspective. Keep the great content coming

@Ofelas1

Жыл бұрын

His name was Karolus Magnus, born, bred, and crowned in German-speaking area. He would never have a French name!

@ems4884

5 ай бұрын

They tend to catch the interest of students who are, well ... already interested in history. You might need something flashier and less detailed for the other variety of students, to draw them in, in their moments of distraction staring at the walls. (Don't underestimate the importance of subtle psychological ploys) ;)

@suebursztynski2530

3 ай бұрын

I’ve taught mediaeval history to Year 8. It was kind of fun. I hope you enjoy!

As a Brit that was fun, true or not. I have spent years following and researching particular family histories and related events but you have given me new ideas. My searches struggle to get beyond the year 1600 AD.

@mamavswild

Жыл бұрын

That’s better than me…I’m American and the sht just goes ‘poof’ into the night. I could trace my ancestors to the ‘Harrisons and the Harringtons’ from northern England who came across on the Boat in the early 1900s. Then it’s all blank.

@SolidusSnapes

10 ай бұрын

@@mamavswild have you tried Y dna?

@teddypantbongaram2865

2 ай бұрын

What do you mean, true or not?

Question: if you were generally following semi-Salic Law, why did you follow Beatrice's line instead of backing up and going down Raymond's line to Spain?

@michaelp7250

2 жыл бұрын

So he could get to the queen of England, which makes for a cooler video. That’s my cynical answer. I don’t have a real answer

@Ardunafeth

2 жыл бұрын

Indeed. All through the first 15 minutes he keeps pushing the salic law and semi salic law argument and that just suddenly gets thrown out of the window in the last 5 minutes...

@TheAlexSchmidt

2 жыл бұрын

Probably since Beatrice inherited the County of Burgundy? It would fit the theme of following who actually became heir.

@WreckageHunter

2 жыл бұрын

Cause then it goes to eventually conflate with the Habsburgs when Joana of Spain marries Philip of Habsburg, and we already know how that "died out". Just don't remember who's the oldest among Charles V and Ferdinand. If it's Charles, then the best claim belongs to Philip VI of Spain. If Ferdinand is older, then it belongs to the Head of the House of Habsburg-Lorraine (who I don't know who is). ... Or maybe it ends in King Sebastian of Portugal (since Manuel I married the older sister of Joana), but that line died out.

@Maob08

2 жыл бұрын

@@WreckageHunter no no He will come. In a morning with fog.

What a perfect video to celebrate 1 million; I actually physically gasped and went "NO WAY" at the end there :D

@efretheim

Жыл бұрын

Same

@cak813

4 ай бұрын

I don’t delude myself in any way that I’m related to anyone famous, royal, etc. My ancestors were hard-working Irish and German immigrants who made their ways to New York City in the 1840s-1850s. They did well for themselves and I’m grateful to them for the life I have today.

@oddursigurdsson9637

3 ай бұрын

@@cak813 If you go back a thousand years your ancestors are so numerous it becomes a bit of a math problem between 1 trillion if nobody married anyone related to them to billions or hundreds of millions. It's kind of like doubling a 1 cent coin over a month becomes a ridiculous number. Obviously thats not possible when people live in the same village for hundreds of years and absolutely do marry their relatives but it's very likely if you go back 1000 years at least someone will have been important and put into history books or papers to deal with inheritances or military things. After all you are a descendant of people who survived very hard times so it's very likely some of them were extraordinary. If they werent then your line would have died off at some point

@cak813

3 ай бұрын

@@oddursigurdsson9637 Thanks for your kind words. You know what it is? I’m in several genealogy groups on Facebook and I get sick of hearing (delusional) people making all kinds of claims that they’re related to royalty, Presidents, actors, people on the Mayflower, etc. Some of them may be (I know it takes a great deal of documentation to become a member of the Mayflower Society or a Son or Daughter of the Revolution) but even if they are, does that make them a better person? It merely gives them bragging rights for a few seconds. Last year, I discovered that a great-grand uncle on my father’s side of the family had fought (for the Union) in the Civil War. I was beyond thrilled. He had only come to the US from Germany two years before and he was 21 when he signed up to join the infantry in April 1861. He was wounded at the Second Battle of Bull Run in August 1862 and he was honorably discharged in December 1862. If he had been a general, I couldn’t be prouder of him. If someone has proof of their lineage, I love hearing about it. It’s the fanciful stories I object to.

Love your channel!! I just ordered five of your charts from your website. Am looking forward to them arriving! Thank you!

Fascinating! Thank you for this production! Just received my chart from dear Canadian friend Theo A. who is royalty in my book!

Apparently my great-great-aunt had done the chart that traced us back to the man himself, but after she passed, no one could find it! I just accept that he's the father of Europe as we know it and go from there.

@suzzanahbessette6989

2 жыл бұрын

I've traced my family back as well. If you can go back enough just to find a titled European in your tree, just follow them and they will get you there 😁

@marknum545

2 жыл бұрын

mathematically speaking everybody today, who is of European ancestry is related to Charlesmagne

@Sedgewise47

2 жыл бұрын

@@marknum545 🤔…I’m married to a European, so-does that mean I’m related to Charlemagne too?(!)….

@micha2909

2 жыл бұрын

@@Sedgewise47 At least you married into a branch of his dynasty ;) and your children will be his fully legitimate descendants. :D

@Just-A-Little-Magic

2 жыл бұрын

@@marknum545 This is an often repeated claim, but a false one, as it is only based on the maths of a clean blood-line. This does not factor in cousin marriages or incest. For instance: from Charles II of Spain back to Philip I of Castile = 5 male ancestors, but 7 female. Besides, I like to believe there are more descendants from Windukind, the Saxon king, then from Charlemagne.

15:20 The thing is that ursurpation was the common way to claim the title of Roman Emperor. And since Charlemagne was proclaimed to be the new Roman Emperor (if you accept the legal position that the imperial throne was vacant because Irene of Athens ruled in Constantinople), it could be argued that the ursurpation of Otto I. was "legitimate" and the Carolingians had lost their right to the emperorship. In this case, the last agnatic legitimate Carolingians could claim the title of "rightful heirs", because they were the last one's to hold a royal title and strict salic law arguably overrules semi-salic law. So it would be the Namur line?

@megameow321

2 жыл бұрын

Wouldn’t be surprised if Liz was the heir under that line too. Lots of crossing of the streams.

@eX1st4132

2 жыл бұрын

I wouldn't trust a comment from a user literally called "Untrue Lie"

@Just-A-Little-Magic

2 жыл бұрын

The chart has been simplified a lot. Ermengarde also had a sister Gerberga, it actually is not known who of them was first born (I myself suspect Gerberga). Her descendants are the counts of Leuven (later Brabant) and Gelre. This line continues via the house of Burgundy to the current king of Spain. Ermengarde's line went from Namur to Luxemburg. This continues via the Duch house of van Egmont into the still existing house of De Riquet de Caraman (title of Prince)

@untruelie2640

2 жыл бұрын

@@Just-A-Little-Magic Thank you. I was confused because I had once researched the Brabant line and it didn't appear on this chart.

@untruelie2640

2 жыл бұрын

@@eX1st4132 Why? It means that I'm speaking the truth. 😉 It's just a little philosophical joke.

Love how you came to your conclusion! Can buy into it!

Congratulations! Well done.

Funfact: Rome (the city) was first ruled by a Romulus, and ended with a Romulus (Romulus Augustulus) you can also say that the Rome as an Empire started with a Julius (adoptive father of the first Emperor), and ended with a Julius (Julius Nepos, ruled the last holdouts of the Western Empire) if you twist it enough Though you can also say that the Eastern part, if you twist it enough, it began with a Constantine (the Great), and ended with a Constantine (the XI)

@keithharper32

2 жыл бұрын

But the last person who ruled by claiming the title of Caesar of Rome was named Nicolas

@Nairda2042

2 жыл бұрын

Well, I won't say the Eastern Roman Empire part needs twisting. Constantine the Great did build Constantinople, and Constantine XI did die with the city. And they both had moms named Helena.

@99batran

2 жыл бұрын

@@Nairda2042 Constantine was around before the Empire officially and permenantly split in 395, many years after he died. So one COULD say he never ruled the Byzantine Empire (or Eastern Rome), that is why I say "twist it" . Though if Roman Constantinople itself, then one could say Constantine to Constantine

@99batran

2 жыл бұрын

@@keithharper32 You really live up to your name. Nah jk. But who even really takes that seriously today?

@markusoliverasagtg9704

2 жыл бұрын

Ayy batran99 nice to see you still alive and kicking, i remember the old mapping days...

Charlemagne: "I spill the blood of Saxon men." Charles Windsor: *incoherently talking to his pot plants*

@zuri2002

2 жыл бұрын

Hey, maybe he's only incoherent to humans, maybe his plants understand him perfectly well.

Brilliant, you deserve this 1m subscriptions and much more!

That...is incredible!

Big congratulations on 1 Million Subscribers! I've been here for a little over a year and have been fascinated by all of the amazing charts that you do and the interesting stories you find while researching these people! I'm an amateur genealogist myself and absolutely love all of the fascinating connections that you've found between people, nations, and religions! I hope to continue to see your channel grow, and look forward to your future videos :)

The Queen: “Oh yes, it’s all coming together.”

Your research is amazing

I love listening to you! You have a nice voice!

What happened to Alfonso VI? Isn't he the most senior legitimate male heir, regardless of whether Beatrice inherited the Countess of Burgundy title?

@avantelvsitania3359

2 жыл бұрын

It was Alfonso VII, by the way. Alfonso VI was the father of his mother Urraca .

@ms_scribbles

2 жыл бұрын

@@avantelvsitania3359 And good lord are they fun to play in CK3. Urraca's a dirty girl (so is Alfonso, but as I was playing him, I tried to get him to end what they were doing), but damn she's clever.

Congratulations, my friend!

What a fascinating little video. Thanks.

Thank you very much this was very fun to watch.

Congratulations on the 1 million subscribers ! It's very well deserved ! It's obvious a ton of work goes into making these charts and videos! This is such a fascinating channel ! Seeing this many people take can interest in what is often very old history is quite satisfying for a history enthusiast such a myself ! Thank you for all that you do in sharing that knowledge with us !

Congratulations Matt, well deserved, your KZread channel is fantastic

I was able to find one line of my family history back to Charlemagne, and it was exciting to do so!! Not only because I’m curious to see how far back I can go, but also because of the names!!!! I love names and finding unique ones is always a treat!

@fuseydunae397

Жыл бұрын

but how do you do it?

@erinesque1889

Жыл бұрын

@@fuseydunae397 I was bedridden from surgery and spent a lot of time on Ancestry and chasing down lines that went somewhere

excellent! much fun. Thanks for this summary.

I'm doubtful if it was ever an actual law, but as the Holy Roman Emperor was tied in concept (and, at least originally, in authority) to the Roman Catholic Church, wouldn't a Protestant heir be cut off from succession in much the same way a Catholic Windsor would be cut off from succeeding to the throne of the U.K.?

@riograndedosulball248

2 жыл бұрын

I imagine exactly the same thing. He played fast with the rules to get the Queen as senior heir, which 1- she isn't, and 2- a protestant couldn't claim succession to a title that was bestowed by the papacy, thus, any claim of heirship coming from the house of Wettin would be illegitimate

@stephenlewis4197

2 жыл бұрын

it's hard to say considering this is before the great schism, let alone the reformation personally I say no considering this is still about the most senor heir to Charlemagne, and not the most legitimate claimant to Holy Roman Emperor

@dracodis

2 жыл бұрын

@@stephenlewis4197 Ach! You're right; I conflated "heir to Charlemagne" and "Holy Roman Emperor," which are not the same thing. My apologies.

@sethn1094

2 жыл бұрын

@@riograndedosulball248 "Defender of the Faith" was a title given by the reigning Pope to Henry VIII which was passed on to the present day despite the Anglican schism.

@christinemuschiato5895

2 жыл бұрын

kent was cut off succession

Congrats Matt and the rest of the UsefulCharts team! You definitely deserve this achievement

Really interesting. Thank you.

Great pacing, was fun to watch!

Matt, you are the one who sparked my interest in genealogy and it is amazing to see you hit 1 million! Congratulations!

Sorry, why did the line go through Beatrice's line, and not Alfonso's? Salic law forbids it going through a woman, and Semi-Salic is only used when Salic runs out of males.

@untruelie2640

2 жыл бұрын

Yes, I thought that as well. In this case, the current "rightful heir" would be Karl of Habsburg(-Lorraine). Technically, he is an agnatic member of the House of Châtenois-Vaudémont, which is one of the oldest agnatic noble houses in Europe.

@nicks5636

2 жыл бұрын

@@untruelie2640 He is an agnatic descendant of the Etichonid/Habsburg dynasty, from which the House of Habsburg and the House of Châtenois/Lorraine are descended. That's one, if not the main reason for why the children of Maria Theresa kept calling themselves Habsburgs. Charles VI of the HRE (Maria Theresa's father) searched for the true genealogy of Francis of Lorraine, discovering that the House of Lorraine and the House of Habsburgs were agnatically the same house. Many historians say that the House of Lorraine is actually descended from the Gerardides, but the Lorraines haplogroup contradicts that. If they were descendants of the Gerardides, their haplogroup would be common in northern Europe instead of being common in southwest Germany and Switzerland (Alemannic-speaking regions). That's why I stick with the Historians that claim that they descend from the Etichonids, because the Etichonids were from Alsace (an Alemannic region), and Lorraines being ancestors of Alemannics while having an alemannic haplogroup has sense.

@untruelie2640

2 жыл бұрын

@@nicks5636 I'm not sure about that. As far as I know, written evidence only points to a descendancy of the House of Châtenois from the Gerardides/Gerhardines. The genetic factor isn't a watertight proof, since it only describes broad categories. The first Gerardides were counts in a number of regions (Paris, Toulouse, Angoulême, Metz) and in carolingian times, fiefdoms were only given out for a lifetime; the vassals also came often from very distant parts of the realm, so we can't be sure were the Gerardides really originated from. Also, the common heritage thing seems to be a little bit TOO convenient. It suited the needs of the Habsburgs perfectly, because it meant that their dynasty nominally wasn't wiped out. Thanks to this "fitting discovery", they effectively absorbed the House of Vaudémont instead of it absorbing them. Also, the connection between the Etichonids and the Habsburgs is unreliable at best.

@nicks5636

2 жыл бұрын

@@untruelie2640 The thing is that there is no written evidence pointing to a descendancy of the House of Châtenois from the Gerardides/Gerhardines, neither to the Etichonid Dynasty. The main argument for the Historians that claim that Lorraines descend from the Gerardides is the name "Gerard", while the main claims for the Historians that claim that Lorraines descend from the Etichonids are: the close relatives of the founder of the House of Lorraine used "d'Alsace" as surname, implying descendance from the Etichonids (rulers of Alsace); and a letter from 1038 of Remiremont abbey that says that Gerard's father was Count of Alsace (implying descendance from the Etichonids again). To all of this add the haplogroup that matches the Etichonids (the origin of the Gerardides is known, and it is northern Francia, they ruled in Paris and even in Normandy before getting Metz, so it can't match with them).

@Just-A-Little-Magic

2 жыл бұрын

@@untruelie2640 From Eticho I come the counts in the Nordgau, then Lancelin of the Breisgau, from who the counts of the Klettgau descend, and from them the house of Habsburg.

Wow! This is some pretty impressive research. Well done on the 1Million subs.

Congratulations on you 1Million subscribers... Your content is just so fascinating that I ended up binge-watching all of its vids🥰

Been here since 50,000 subscribers and watched every single video ever uploaded. Always wondered how it is possible the best channel on youtube is short of one million, and the day has finally come. Two years, 4 charts bought, three charts made, three social medias where i follow and 950,000 subscribers later, matt you are amazing!

Congrats on hitting a million!! And thank you for never disappointing!! This was a fun 1!! I was really into it.

Frederick II regarded his son Manfred as legitimate (he was a natural child, but Frederick probably married his mother, Bianca Lancia, many years after his birth). Manfred became king of Italy after Conradin and his daughter married king Peter III of Aragon. Their sons Alfonso and, later, James became the following two kings of Aragon. So the heir of Charlemagne could be Felipe VI. Ironic: Spain was the only country which Charlemagne failed to conquer.

@darthparallax5207

9 ай бұрын

Spain is also where the Bourbons take you. Spain is also a major theater for the Bonapartists. The Spanish Empire also ruled more of the New World than any other government in history, Indigenous or European. If you manage to unite the Spanish, British, and French Empires at their greatest extents together...... Well you basically get NATO lol.

@gm2407

8 ай бұрын

​@@darthparallax5207Does Nato have the steam achievement though?

Recently, KZread offered me this video, which I so truly enjoyed it. Fantastic work, Matt! Of course, you are counting with a new suscriber. Warm greetings from Yucatán, Mexico.

I think you missed at the end. George VI had two daughters (the Queen and Princess Margaret) so it would go to George VI's younger brother Prince Henry Duke of Gloucester and his son Richard.

@jayit6851

2 жыл бұрын

I believe semi-salic law jumps to a grandson before it goes to a brother.

@piratesswoop725

2 жыл бұрын

@@jayit6851 Is there any country where this has been applied? Russia used semi-Salic law, but the sons of Grand Duchess Xenia, who would have been female-line grandsons of Alexander III and the closest living male heirs to Nicholas II, were passed over in favor Grand Duke Kirill, of the son of Alexander III's brother. Same in Hannover, Victoria would have been the closest female heir to William, but was passed over in favor of a brother. Wiki's description of the law is thus: "The so-called Semi-Salic version of succession order stipulates that firstly all-male descendance is applied, including all collateral male lines; but if all such lines are extinct, then the closest female agnate (such as a daughter) of the last male holder of the property inherits, and after her, her own male heirs according to the Salic order." "all collateral male lines" seems to indicate to me that ALL male dynasts must be exhausted before a woman or her heirs can succeed.

@tellthemborissentyou

2 жыл бұрын

@lex ora No they are proper royalty because they don't bow down to a pope.

What a fun topic! Congratulations on 1 million!

Congratulations 🎉🎉🎉

Great job. Deep dive.

Happy for you! I have learned so much from this channel and my dad enjoyed some episodes too. Keep the good work up. On the road to 2M now 🙌

This is one of my all-time favorite YT channels! Nice job!

Congratulations 🎉

I think what is most fascinating is that one of Charlemagne's greatest feats was that he indirectly seeded multiple kingdoms, each that would become as great as his own. It may not have been a single grand empire, but I feel that to have your lineage grow up to become many separate kingdoms is more valuable to lay claim on.

@oddursigurdsson9637

3 ай бұрын

Didn't his sons instantly begin warring with each other over the spoils once he died? Idk if that was so great of him

Nice trick, but according to your own Chart the house of Bourbon is the senior heir of Charlemagne, thus the King of Spain is the heir descendant of Bourbon and Habsburgs and basically from almost all royal houses. It is either Felipe VI OR LOUIS XX of France.

@ruibeto

2 жыл бұрын

I was thinking exactly that 🤔, I imagine is Louis Alphonse de Bourbon duke D'Anjou the cousin of the king of Spain.

@enriquematorrasmunoz9753

2 жыл бұрын

Not Felipe VI because of semi salic law, so it would be the carlists claimants

@MAP2023

2 жыл бұрын

@@enriquematorrasmunoz9753 it would be but the Carlist claimant is extinct

@maarysb26

Жыл бұрын

That video is about de most senior heir (by blood) not the person who would be holy Roman emperor today

@MAP2023

Жыл бұрын

@@maarysb26 I talking about the chart.

Congratulations Matt! I love this channel, you always make great interesting and quality content. I am looking forward to receiving my Carolingian Dynasty chart!

Congratulations! 1 million!!!

As soon as you hit the Electors of Saxony, I knew where it would end, but very informative. Thank you.

Wait, what about the Alfonso VI of Castile and Leon? Where does that line lead? That line should have seniority over Beatrice of Burgundy.

@valentinmitterbauer4196

2 жыл бұрын

By this time the old salic way of succession was replaced by the male *preferenced* primogeniture, which means that if you (the king) have no sons the title doesn't go to your brother, but your oldest daughter, even if she has no son at the time. Only if you have no children at all your brother would inherit the title. If they kept the old way of succession, then the title of "most senior heir of Charlemagne" would go with the title of King of Castille. Here things get tricky a few generations down, when Alfonso XI wasn't able to father a legitimate, but his title got inherited by his oldest illegimate son. Eventually the crown of castille would end up on the head of the Habsburg kings. So the title of "most senior heir of Charlemagne" would belong to Karl Habsburg, today's head of the Habsburg family. But only if we ignored the change in succession law.

Thank you! Congratulations on 1M Subscribers! I'm really inspired by your work too! Well Done :)

Brilliantly fascinating!

I actually didn't think it was going to end up where it did! I could tell you had a lot of fun with this one! thanks !

Congrats on 1 million, u deserve it and what a fantastic video to celebrate!

Congratulations, you earned it. Thanks for the great content and keep it up!

I rolled my eyes so hard as soon as he said "Saxe-Coburg and Gotha". What an unexciting end. lol

@Cdr_Mansfield_Cumming

3 ай бұрын

Me too. Unless you are British or in one of the Kingdoms, that nugget would fly right past the rest of the world.

@tc2334

3 ай бұрын

@@Cdr_Mansfield_Cumming I was hoping for it to be someone else of some minor royal family somewhere and to learn something new about that family, but no, of course is the British Royal family. I mean, how could it not be? 😒

This was great... the ending made me laugh. Especially now!

I'm so glad for you, that you reached one million. I live watching your videos, they are so interesting and amazingly researched

That was an amazing chart. What a way to celebrate a million subscribers and Elizabeth II's 70 years on the throne!

@giovanniscott5455

Жыл бұрын

I just looked up Semi Salic law the position can be passed down to a female. Although the female's son will inherit the title. Therefore this is a whole heap CROC OF SHIT. Therefore if you rewatch this fake video propaganda for British Royalty. You will notice rventhough they say they was doing semi salic law, which can be passed down to a daughter although her son would inherit the title. This means my family could be the Senoor Heir of Charlemagbe. If you watch this video again you will see they skipped Lothaiir I daughter Ermangarde of Lower Lorraine. Which means it would go to Rainier I of Lorraine. Thus means the Senior Heir of Charlemagne would be from a descendant of Zachary Taylor the 12th President of the United States. Which is scary because he is my 2nd Generation Great Grandfather.

@VeracityLH

Жыл бұрын

You need to read more history. The meaning if Salic and semi-Salic law changed over the centuries and was applied differently in different countries and at different times. Not to mention of the law of Greater Army Diplomacy. Unfortunately, might often made right. Otherwise there's a guy living in Canada who might have been King of England.

@charliedegiulio9951

Жыл бұрын

What if they took this chart and continued it all the way to today?

This went in all kinds of wacky directions! Great video.

This was riveting. I learned alot

Congratulations on reaching 1M subscribers 🎉 Loved the surprise ending. I have your book, several other charts and now I’m adding this newest chart to my collection. I love history and am teaching my grandchildren to appreciate it too, as they are also descended from Charlemagne.

Congrats on 1 million! I always loved these family trees!

Congratulations

Wow! Awesome! TY!

Congratulations on 1 million! I've been here for since when you first became popular! Truly one of the most engaging channels on youtube! Thanks again!

Love the channel and the history! It also has motivated me to research my family history, which has started a whole new hobby. Thanks for all the great content!

@colinbarthel

2 жыл бұрын

Also just bought the chart and am happy I got it in time!

Thank you so much for the VERY interesting research, explaining for me the choice of name for the new king of GB!!

Thoroughly enjoyed.

Congratulations on 1mil. You deserve it!

Charlemagne is my 43rd great grandfather and it was actually by happy accident that I discovered this. I LOVE watching the show "who do you think you are". My jaw DROPPED when in Cindy Crawford's episode they started talking about my 11th great grandfather Thomas Trowbridge. and they traced his ancestry all the way back to Charlemagne. Great video!

@magister343

2 жыл бұрын

@L-Goldwood All of them. Every human being is a family member if you go distant enough.

@retroactivejealousy-worldl1805

Жыл бұрын

Did you come across an ancestor called Sir Guy de Bryan by any chance?

@ipiepiepiei9550

Жыл бұрын

Your majesty 🤴

@mamavswild

Жыл бұрын

Every European has Charlemagne for a 43rd Great grandfather 😂 (or 41,42,44 depending on your individual age)

@kingbluefield1087

Жыл бұрын

@@retroactivejealousy-worldl1805 he is in my ancestry

Thank you

Man your videos always cheer me up also you got me over 10 A’s in history cause of how much I watch your videos

Well done mate 👏 Thanks a lot for doing so many interesting videos. I watch your videos and they are great. Your hard work doing them videos is amazing. Congratulations 👏

I had a feeling it's gonna come back to her. It always does.

I received my signed numbered poster. Very nice Matt.

congrats!

Hey congrats on this milestone! You do good work!

thank you, Matt & Co! your videos are legit university grade lectures! but also the "intellectual dessert" of the week, to me 😂 keep up the good work!

Came across this video just when Charles had been proclaimed King. Wow.

wow! this was an awesome video, history is crazy

Congratulations on 1 million subs, keep up the great content! Mazal tov!

Great video but I would think it would go to the descendants of the Castile -Leon line.

Fascinating look at the persistance of Royal lines.

My brain exploded about half way through, but it was a fun ride through so much history. Thank you so much for an understandable view of extensive complexity.

Great Video! I would not have expected Prince Charles to be his heir all this time later. However, I do think there was a different way the heirship should've gone. At 16:19 , I think the title should have passed to Alfonso VI of Castile and León. Yes the title could pass by Semi-Salic law to Henry VI of Germany through Beatrice, but Semi-Salic law was only meant to be implemented when there were no other male heirs. Alfonso VI and his descendants should've been heirs to Charlemagne first before the Beatrice line. You could make another interesting video on this one as well, as they've had their fair share of Queens, periods with Salic law, and Carlism later. TLDR: I think Junior Male line > Senior Female line according to Salic law.

@ByzantineDarkwraith

2 жыл бұрын

I was thinking this... any idea if they have living descendants? Do the Spanish Bourbons descend from them through a woman or two?

@MAP2023

2 жыл бұрын

The King of Spain is the real heir. Matt just wanted to play because he is an Anglo. 😂

@angusyang5917

2 жыл бұрын

If we go down Alfonso VI's line, the heir would be Karl von Habsburg.

@MAP2023

2 жыл бұрын

@@angusyang5917 Wrong, the senior is Charles I king of Spain and V HRE. Felipe II his son is the senior one, not his brother Thus the Habsburg - Lothringen is not senior but FELIPE VI is the most senior. The only one who can fight The title is Louis XX de Bourbon, the chief of the Capet dynasty and the head of the House of Bourbon

@Xerxes2005

2 жыл бұрын

​@@ByzantineDarkwraith From what I read, Philip V of Spain got his legitimacy from his grand-mother Maria Theresa, wife of Louis XIV of France and daughter of Philip IV of Spain, of the House of Habsburg. Her ancestor Charles V got the throne of Spain through his mother Joanna the Mad, who descends from Alfonso VII (not VI, as it is written in the chart) from both her parents, Ferdinand II of Aragon and Isabella I of Castile. If I read correctly, then King Felipe VI of Spain should be considered Charlemagne's heir. Although Luis Alfonso de Bourbon is actually the senior member of House Bourbon, so maybe he should be considered Charlemagne's heir. The legitimists consider that he has the best claim to the throne of France.

I feel like there should be a different ending to this. King Edward VII gave away all his patrilineal succesion rights to his brother, Alfred, the Duke of Saxe-coburg and gotha ( 2nd son of Queen Victoria ). Hence he should be the rightful heir and not Edward. Since Alfred's son died without heir, by the semi salic law, his oldest daughter ( Queen Marie, the Queen of Romania) gets to pass it to her son King Carol II of Romania. Who then passes to his son, King Michael I of Romania ( who has no sons and his oldest daughter is childless) , whose 2nd daughter ( Princess Elena of Romania) passes it to her son, Mr. Nicholas Medforth-Mills. ( who is considered the heir to the pretender of the Romanian crown) So the Succesion should be 1. Alfred, Duke of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha 2. King Carol II of Romania ( via his mother Queen Marie) 3. King Michael I of Romania 4. Mr. Nicholas Medforth-Mills.

@tuplat5107

2 жыл бұрын

And also "No woman shall succeed in Salic land.” So nobody in the whole line of Beatrice countess of Burgundy has any claim.

@selahanany5645

2 жыл бұрын

@@tuplat5107 He was going by semi salic

@stephaniejane306

2 жыл бұрын

@@tuplat5107 he was going by semi salic law and then he explained that once it was common for male preference primogeniture he went by that.

@jefferym3366

2 жыл бұрын

​@@tuplat5107 That does not discount the woman's line. It just means on the face of it upon the death of the Heir woman are treated as dead. Salic law did not exclude women's until the french did not want the english monarch to have any claim to the throne. It originally was like male-preference primogenture, with woman disqualified for succussion like a british dynast taking catholic communion, which does not disqualify their children, present or future.

@nd2997

2 жыл бұрын

Just no! Saxe-Coburg were junior line of Wettins. Grand Duke of Saxe-Weimar were senior line. This video just tried to point it to the Coburg to get to Elizabeth who still wont be heir it would be her male cousin.

The male branch became king of Castile and Leon. But let's forget about them and develop only the female branch leading, what a surprise, to the king of England. Edit: you made a second video, of the same high quality, discussing also Spain, Prussia, Bavaria and an Australian DJ. Many thanks.