🚩 The first 1,000 people to use this link will get a 1 month free trial of Skillshare: skl.sh/historymarche12201

@Human.Being23

2 жыл бұрын

Yaaayyy!

@KiranSingh-zr8jr

2 жыл бұрын

Love your videos

@emmanuelfernandez04

2 жыл бұрын

Any updates on Hannibal?

@generichomosapien4666

2 жыл бұрын

darn

@saratmodugu2721

2 жыл бұрын

The avar khanate still had Slavic vassals at the borders of the khazars and as far as north Poland. You map is wrong

The quality of your maps is insane. Makes a huge difference in gaining a detailed understanding!

@onetwothreefourfive12345

2 жыл бұрын

So true

@ramichahin2

2 жыл бұрын

its a lie to call roman catholicism ''The True Christian Faith'' because the romans paganised The True Faith beyond recognition.

@aSm8full

2 жыл бұрын

and the lack of jokes are a great plus too as they kind of break the immersion imho

@DenUitvreter

2 жыл бұрын

Indeed, even the Netherlands shore line and inner waters, which have changed a lot over the centuries, are period correct.

@iowastate358

2 жыл бұрын

A racist that didn't open his land to Muslims and Africans

Liam Neeson and his "very particular set of skills" caught me offguard lmao

@Michael_______

2 жыл бұрын

Made me laugh. I love that very much.

@iowastate358

2 жыл бұрын

A true racist that didn't open up the land to mass Muslim and African migration 😭

@iowastate358

2 жыл бұрын

No LGBTQ++ community 😭

@andrewharper3165

2 жыл бұрын

@@iowastate358 take that nonsense somewhere else, you're ruining an otherwise brilliant channel with your narrow minded blinkered self.

@BStial223

2 жыл бұрын

@@iowastate358 what African immigration are you talking about ? Learn your 8th century history, because you are talking bs

I love geography and I admire your sense of detail in these maps. e.g the Netherlands have their actual correct size for the time, and not the reclaimed area they have now. maybe people miss these small details, but when u see them done right it is oh so satisfying to look at. :)

@HistoryMarche

2 жыл бұрын

Glad you noticed. Thank you for the nice words.

@Matthew10950

2 жыл бұрын

@@HistoryMarche I can only hear any reply or posted comment from HistoryMarche in the narrators voice. I know it isn't right, but I can't help it!

@HistoryMarche

2 жыл бұрын

@@Matthew10950 The commander ordered the men to drink a cup of milk and then to charge forward! As the two armies clashed they began tickling each other to death. Many men fell, but it was a lot of fun and a lot of laughter!

@Matthew10950

2 жыл бұрын

@@HistoryMarche lol, undoubtedly a quote from the upcoming series "Hugh Hefner, and the siege of the Playboy Mansion"

Me: This day can't be better HistoryMarche: Hey there

@mihkeltroost8769

2 жыл бұрын

for real I have been waiting for a video about Charlemagne for a loong time

@edishasora5200

2 жыл бұрын

For real! It just their viewers isnt as massive as KnG. I think HM need to work on their thumbnail more. The content are way way better than the thumbnail. It could be more tempting to click. Hope HM team see this and working more on the thumbnail

@nervachadikus

2 жыл бұрын

@@edishasora5200 True, I will remember the animation from the fall of the west for the rest of my life

@CelticSaint

2 жыл бұрын

Bad day for me. Diagnosed with an inoperable cancer. I have 6 months at most. But I'll be watching these videos to my last breath.

@edishasora5200

2 жыл бұрын

@@nervachadikus yea it was lit. For me its battle of Ain Jalut, Mongol defeated near jerussalem. Feels like watching a movie. The narration and the struggle it was spot on

I am still PATIENTLY awaiting the Hannibal series so please HistoryMarche make my wish come true

@drlca6601

2 жыл бұрын

bruh we just got Charlemagne, this is a victory... patience

@bahaataleb7725

2 жыл бұрын

they already did it

@53yearsago56

2 жыл бұрын

@@bahaataleb7725he never covered the battle of Zama so I hope they will continue the series.

@midoelshafaey8026

2 жыл бұрын

R u kidding me !? It’s their biggest series .. they already did it

@ElderGod4

2 жыл бұрын

@@midoelshafaey8026 nah its just started

Clean, concise, Informative. This is the best video on Charlemagne. He laid the groundwork for modern Europe.

One of Napoleon Bonaparte’s heroes

@Nomadicenjoyerplus

2 жыл бұрын

Others are Julius Caesar, Hannibal Barca, Alexander the Great, Nader Shah though 🤨

@ru4582

2 жыл бұрын

Literally every European monarch after Charlemagne were in some way trying to replicate his career.

@angelostriandos6659

2 жыл бұрын

That is why even Napoleon went to the Pope for his coronation. Legitimacy is always the question.

@MikhailTabigay

2 жыл бұрын

@@ru4582 yeah, and Charlemagne wasn’t the first man in Europe to conquer different lands?

@AlexC-ou4ju

2 жыл бұрын

@@MikhailTabigay Rome?

One of my favorite medieval characters. Not only by his influence and important role in medieval history, but for all he achieved during his lifetime. I can't wait for the next episode of the series, and congratulations to HistoryMarche for another great production.

@joachimverbruggen6062

2 жыл бұрын

Yes but the much important groundwork was laid by his father Pepin, I don't think you can't talk about charlemagne and dismiss Pepin so easy.

@andersonolb1793

2 жыл бұрын

@@joachimverbruggen6062 You're right my friend. Pepin set the basis from which the carolingian dinasty could grow its influence throughout most of Europe, especially the close ties established with Church, from which they gained the necessary legitimicy to rule.

The partition in chapters and the quotes of historians really give an edge to your videos

Fantastic, narrator finds a way to cram everything in without it seeming like a text book, well done 👍🏻🇮🇪

Charlamagne is an ancestor of mine. I have a ton of nobility in my family lines and i can trace both of my parents lines at least as far back as Charlamagne and further. Its actually really cool seeing how far back it goes on charts.

At 13:58 it states that the Pope believes he has implicit superiority over the emperor. But this is not the case. The understanding was that the Pope had supremacy over spiritual matters and the Emperor had supremacy over earthly matters. That is why, if I am not mistaken, the Emperor kneels before the Pope to be crowned but after he is crowned the Pope bows to him.

@nathanscarlett4772

2 жыл бұрын

Interesting, I did not know this. Thank you.

He was truly great, to put into perspective, all of West Europe was broken in pieces, no unity but all of that changed with his hard work!!

@thhseeking

2 жыл бұрын

And then fell apart gain after his death.

@younes2415

2 жыл бұрын

@@thhseeking he left a basis for a state in Germany and France, to put into perspective again, there was no unity in what we call France now or Germany, he unified these towns and their economies.

Leo III is actually considered a saint in the Catholic Church, probably for being one of the most based dudes of the Middle Ages.

@rmp7400

Жыл бұрын

@Austin Based dudes?

@oboroth51

7 ай бұрын

Papist schismatic🤢

The maps just keep getting mappier. Love it!

Great video and great editing! Just something I would love to have: the current year should always be displayed in the top-left side of the screen (it would be very nice to see how the years pass by as I observe the teritorial changes) and also to have the current age of each character displayed near/inside their flag. Anyways, thanks again for the great work & content, I learn a lot from it!

I really wish that the 769 AD start date would be on CK3 but oh well.

@williamtheconqueror7807

2 жыл бұрын

Mhm.

@niccolocaramori7288

2 жыл бұрын

Play CK2 then or use a mod

@TheMops14

2 жыл бұрын

Don't worry, you'll get it in a DLC for 20$. That's Paradox for you.

@impaugjuldivmax

2 жыл бұрын

@@TheMops14 20$ just for maps, without skins of units

@mariano98ify

2 жыл бұрын

@@TheMops14 and not problem for me if the content of the expansions or vanilla game is good. What it is your problem? do you prefer that paradox focus in release sequels each X years???

One of the best channels. So detailed and vivid. The quality is bombastic. Thanks for making these amazing videos!

Thank you History Marche for doing what you do. My favorite History Channel on the tube. You may not release videos at the rate that the other channels do, but the ones you do release are of the upmost quality. It only gets better and better, to the point of being cinematic. You are doing heavenly work for us history nerds. Thank you.

I read a book on Charlemagne , once , I think by Lamb , his accomplishments were absolutely phenomenal . Great vid , thanks !

Oh how long have i wated! This is the kind of channels that deserve the most support in KZread, not the silly ones, thank you 🌹

@AeneasGemini

2 жыл бұрын

what's wrong with silly channels? Plenty of room for both to be appreciated!

@arabian9372

2 жыл бұрын

@@AeneasGemini hungry for argument much? watch jake paul and the likes of him, if there is room for them in your time, but not mine dear aeneas, not mine

The illustrations are so good!

@HistoryMarche

2 жыл бұрын

Thank you sir.

@zacjie1551

2 жыл бұрын

😀

@jezm7828

2 жыл бұрын

The character details are very challenging.

@zacjie1551

2 жыл бұрын

@@jezm7828 :}

Thanks very much once again HistoryMarche for an outstanding vid! Just wanted to take a moment to mention that I am extremely happy to see your use of some of the most noteworthy paintings history has provided us, no more so than that of The Coronation of Charlemagne, at the T.S. 8:50 mark. I once saw a film that explained in great detail (forgive me, I forget the name of it) why the great artists drew what they drew. In essence, every person in these frescoes are there for a reason and in fact their individual gestures, expressions, actions, dress, etc has strong reason for being the way they are in the painting. An absolutely fascinating revelation to me back then and I've since tried to discover the hidden meanings portrayed in all the great artworks, since. Folks may wish to do the same, as it reveals FAR MORE to a painting than we ever actually imagined!

@HistoryMarche

Жыл бұрын

Thank you so much for the positive feedback. Truly appreciated!

I've not studied Charlemagne's military campaigns specifically, but my understanding was that he conquered by superior numbers, logistics, and organization, not by big battles. A BIG battle was a chancy affair, and he wisely avoided them most of the time. E.g. he caused the Avars to disappear from history, without any big battle.

@Dave_Sisson

2 жыл бұрын

I've always wondered what race / linguistic group the Avars belonged to. Were they Germanic, Magyar, Turkic, Slavic or something else?

Once I saw empress Irene and the Byzantine Empire I cant stop watching this!! and can you guys please do the rise and battles of basil II or the rain of Empress Irene !:)

@user-ll9hb3sd8h

2 жыл бұрын

Basil the Hellenic sator!

@trentondamm194

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-ll9hb3sd8h More like Basil the Bulgar Slayer!

@jonathancummings6400

2 жыл бұрын

Had they had this sort of presentation of his greatness, they wouldn't have balked at embracing him and joining him to restore the Roman Empire in it's full ancient glory.

I wish superb content like this was available when I was studying history. Brings it to life thereby greatly facilitating comprehension and retention.

Thanks for doing a Charlemagne video! I feel like despite how influential his reign was I know comparatively little about it and the broader geopolitics and culture of the period.

Charlemagne was one of the most influential figures in Christianity can’t wait for part 2 Will there be a battle ?

@kolerick

2 жыл бұрын

well, there are few that documented further than the result... the one that would be documented would be a defeat, in Ronceveau...

@almightydummy

2 жыл бұрын

true, every European colonizers execute natives that worships other Gods. Good old days.

@zahirhussain5913

Жыл бұрын

What did Charlemagne ? Destroying the places of worship was also used as an alternative method of conversion when peaceful means of persuasion ( preaching , miracles , etc. ) or social factors ( rewards , etc. ) seemed insufficient ". ARTICLE : Christian Attitude towards Pagan Monuments in Late Antiquity and Their Legacy in Later Byzantine Centuries page - 49 AUTHOR : Helen Saradi - Mendelovici SOURCE : Dumbarton Oaks Papers , Vol. 44 ( 1990 ) , pp. 47-61

@zahirhussain5913

Жыл бұрын

Christianity spread by sword: Charlemagne conducted his first campaign against Saxons in 772 AD .His forces advanced rapidly to the castle of Eresburg and destroyed the major Saxon shrine called the " Irminsul " The Royal Frankish Annals for 772 triumphantly claimed that huge amounts of treasure , consisting of gold and silver had fallen into Charlemagne's hands , plunder that may have been pagan sacrificial offerings ; this booty also seemed to fire the enthusiasm of the king's retinue for waging war . BOOK : CHARLEMAGNE . Author : Johannes Fried . Translated by Peter Lewis . Edition 2016 page - 99 .

@zahirhussain5913

Жыл бұрын

Under Charlemagne rule : " Many people died in infancy , some in maturity and others in old age " . " Many of the poor found themselves forced by sheer poverty to kill their infant offspring , above all , girls . Many other babies were exposed and left to die- archetypes for the fairy tale of Hansel and Gretel . It was just a fact of life then that some times people found it impossible to feed their children . People lived in their respective world's , rich or poor , sated or hungry , and not a few of them in desperate need . " BOOK : CHARLEMAGNE . Author : Johannes Fried . Translated by Peter Lewis . Edition 2016 page - 57 .

Charlemagne is one of the greatest statesmen of middle age Europe who restored a portion of the Western Roman Empire.

I learn more from you guys than any history book, please keep up the fantastic work! (And soothing voice work)

Man, John Julius Norwich could write very well. Extremely rich description that explains the concepts very clearly and concise. Simultaneously it is written as if it is a narration.

Great work 👏 👍 I would like to suggest a series to cover the second crusade both the Eastern and western parts which not yet covered by any historical channel

So glad for this story

One great documentary after another. Love the videos and cheers from Estonia

The commercial at the beginning is one of the most engaging I’ve seen. Very well presented sales pitch. Also, these videos are incredibly well done.

“I am only surpassed by Napoleon.”

@ru4582

2 жыл бұрын

His legacies were way way more influential than Napoleon. Just maybe not as dramatic and entertaining. The post-industrial world simply doesn’t allow the existence of a large, all encompassing empire, Charlemagne style.

@johngallagher9151

2 жыл бұрын

@@ru4582 Charlemagne didnt have an empire, he had a kingdom compared to actual empires like the Persians, Parthians, Romans, Macedonians/Greeks/Illyrians, etc.

@stefandusan9629

2 жыл бұрын

@@johngallagher9151 Charlemange could literally eradicate the entire world of "illyria" if it still existed then and leave not a single trace of it left.

@mariano98ify

2 жыл бұрын

@@johngallagher9151 Are you blind kid? comapre the size of the Charlemagne Empire vs the common kingdoms of previous time. Beside, an Empire is an empire when under its state have other lesser states/ranks inside, and the one of Charlemagne achieved all of this.

@ru4582

2 жыл бұрын

@@johngallagher9151 don’t see the difference here. His realm was comprised of several constituent kingdoms and it was gigantic af in the scope of Western Europe, encompassing several realms that later would have been developed enough to themselves be empires.

Did not expect video this soon! Thank u HM

Absolutely amazing work as always man!! 👏👏👏

Looking forward to more on this topic Top notch work as usual historymarche

It wasn't the "holy" roman empire yet, it was just called the roman empire. The HRE is an entity that is indeed derived from Charlemagne's empire, but noticeably different as well, and not just in name. The HRE as we know it will be created later, in a more germanic-centric context.

@wy2041

2 жыл бұрын

Actually that would be the germanic Holy Roman Empire, not the same thing as the Holy Roman Empire

@johnnyboy3410

Жыл бұрын

the actual Holy Roman Empire is the one Otto The Great created i guess but it wasn’t called Holy until Fredreich Barbossa one of the greatest if not greatest Holy Roman emperors, he was the one who named it holy

@sebe2255

Жыл бұрын

I would say a more German context. The Frankish Empire definitely had a Germanic character, given that the Franks themselves were and still are Germanic.

@xenotypos

Жыл бұрын

@@sebe2255 It doesn't have much to do with the differences between the Carolingian empire and the HRE. But since you're mentioning it, I'd argue that the early Franks didn't that much to do with the later Franks. During Charlemagne time, "frank" had been a term designing the people in a lot of places including modern day France for centuries. And there are a lot of Germanic ancestry in the northern half of France. French itself was influenced by germanic dialects even if it's a latin language.

@sebe2255

Жыл бұрын

@@xenotypos Not really. Frank became a general term to refer to people from western Europe because of the success of the Frankish Empire. Other cultures labeling a very broad region of western europe as Frankish has little relevance to determining who the Franks were ath that point. When you say early Franks were little like later Franks, that is true and untrue. In the sense that later Franks were more organized christians, they were little like early Franks. But they still spoke their language and continued many cultural practices. Of course over hundreds of years cultures change, but that applies to every culture, and in that way, no culture is like it was 1000 years ago. Neither Franks, nor French of Germans or anyone beyond those regions. As for the Germanic heritage in northern France, of course there is some, but it is limited to the very north and the Alsace. And not all of them are Frankish in nature, the Alsace for one is/was Allemanic.

Brilliant video Mago! Can't wait for part 2.

@HistoryMarche

2 жыл бұрын

Coming soon!

Great video! I can't wait for the next installment.

Super video! Very clear to understand the complexity of this time! ^^

The spread of Christianity, was not just for a Cultural Unity. In the Cloisters, they could form a new Educated Upper Class. Reading and Writing helps alot for gaining Knowlege of all Kinds.

@Leptospirosi

2 жыл бұрын

Except the most ancient cloisters which started hosting valuable books, were built by the Lombard in Italy and by the Visigoth in southern France, both of which, by the VIII were fully converted to Catholic Christianity. Most of the new monastry came from Ireland to the mainlad, on which Charles had little to do with. Fact is that spreading of Christianity had little to do with Charles politics except to enforce control. As all of Germany was already catholic christian, the only "spread" Charles did of Christianity was over Saxony, a very small part of Germany, using faith as a tool to submit the tribes he had not completely genocided or deported.

OH YES, this oughta be delightful

@thhseeking

2 жыл бұрын

Betty!!

As usual, exceptional work!

I said it once and I'll say it again. I like it knowing it will be great before seeing the video!

This is very convenient I’m taking AP ero this year and we had to learn the time period of 750 to 1450 over the summer.

The Abbasid caliphate reached its apogee under his rule, which was characterized by relative peace, prosperity, and unity of the Islamic community. Corresponded with and sent a diplomatic mission to the Holy Roman Emperor, Charlemagne, opening a period of technological and economic exchange with the West. Established a hostel for Christian pilgrims in Jerusalem. Set up the first hospital and observatory in Baghdad, which served as models for later rulers.

@shahsaud2625

2 жыл бұрын

Well, medieval Islamic world was way better. It's now that the Muslim world is a mess

@ru4582

2 жыл бұрын

@@shahsaud2625 industrialization definitely brought many more sources of division into the Muslim world than the previous millennia. The abbasids didn’t have to deal with imperialism and weird borders and had a relatively united caliphate under their governance. Hell, they had an actual caliphate to work with, whereas the position has been vacant nowadays ever since the dissolution of the Ottomans.

@Artur_M.

2 жыл бұрын

If I'm not mistaken, they sent a living elephant in this mission, as one of the gifts.

Awesome topic, super excited for part 2!

I'm really greatful for the making of these videos, thank you.

Last time I was this early Charlemagne wasn't even Emperor yet.

I find it equally fascinating that the title Magnus - Charlemagne comes from "Carolus Magnus" in Latin, "Charles the Great" - has survived since antiquity (i.e. Pompeius Magnus, Caesar's rival in the Roman civil war) as I found it disappointing that Charlemagne wasn't just a really cool name.

@FatGouf

2 жыл бұрын

Just call him Charlie the Great.

@Nielsly

2 жыл бұрын

Karl the Great sounds less impressive than Charlemagne

@BillGreenAZ

2 жыл бұрын

Whenever I see the name Charlemagne, I try to think of it as "Charles the Magnificent" since it shares the root of that word.

@Nielsly

2 жыл бұрын

@@BillGreenAZ magnificent comes from magnificentior “great in deeds”, from magnificus, from magnus + facere “to act great”, magne comes from just magnus “(the) great/big”. So Karl the Great, in the same row as Alexander and Peter, not in the same row as Suleiman.

@BillGreenAZ

2 жыл бұрын

@@Nielsly So Charlemagne means "large Charles" and not "magnificent Charles"?

It's the first time I learn about Charlemagne. Impressive individual.

Thank you for making such great videos on historic battles.

I gladly pay homage to the algorithm on behalf of HistoryMarche!

Subscribed😁

@HistoryMarche

2 жыл бұрын

Welcome to the channel.

@zacjie1551

2 жыл бұрын

@@HistoryMarcheThanks

You guys and kings and generals are the best I've found.thank you

Let's shed the blood of the Saxon men!

@nightrunner3701

2 жыл бұрын

They were pagans… For the ignorant morons out there… Even IF the pagans were not raiding civilized lands, they were always fighting each other, so inevitably 1 if the various groups will try to get help from the civilization closest. Providing ample reason for conquest.

@dittmannrudolfrohr2149

2 жыл бұрын

@@nightrunner3701 "Pagan" is an exonym.

@AlphaSections

2 жыл бұрын

@@nightrunner3701 I thoughts exactly!

Just saying but I would love to see a video on the 778 battle of Roncevaux pass and I am interested in this battle because even though it was a defeat for charlemagne the battle saw the death of a Frankish military leader named Roland and his death elevated him and the members of charlemagnes court aka the paladins into legend becoming the quintessential role model for knights and greatly influencing the code of chivalry in the Middle Ages aka the dark ages and this battle is recounted in the 11 century The song of Roland which is the oldest surviving major work of French literature.

Yay iv been waiting for a bud from you guys!

I missed history march videos. I thought the channel was slowly and sadly dying but this great video proved that is still rising

Ah Charlemagne, truly the greatest medieval European ruler.......well, at least bedsides us TRUE Romans.

@sijanshamsulalam4243

2 жыл бұрын

Very rare of you praising the barbarians of the west my liege.

@nonnayerbusiness7704

2 жыл бұрын

Too bad you left your own empire an over-extended, bankrupt and depopulated shadow of its former self.

@chrissantos1012

2 жыл бұрын

You’re not even Roman bro

@justinian-the-great

2 жыл бұрын

@@sijanshamsulalam4243 Well, the credit should be given where it is due. Sure, Charlemagne is a barbarian and a wicked one (he stole the one and all title of the Roman Emperor), but there was never a greater barbarian in the medieval Europe.....that is, as much "great" as barbarians can achieve greatness.

@justinian-the-great

2 жыл бұрын

@@nonnayerbusiness7704 Or perhaps famine, dozens of dammed earthquakes and, you know, a FRICKING SECOND WORST PANDEMIC OF PLAGUE IN THE ENTIRE HISTORY did that, huh? Also, I didn't really left my Empire bankrupt, since I managed to recover the economy in 550's, so I don't know from whom you heard that story of bankruptcy? At least my Empire existed for another 9 centuries, while Charlemagne's fell apart just 29 years after his death.

Thank you for providing us with more valuable videos translated into Arabic💜

@HistoryMarche

2 жыл бұрын

My pleasure 😊 Arabic subtitles added.

@zhugeliang2121

2 жыл бұрын

@@HistoryMarche We have benefited a lot from the history of your channel and I hope all your historical videos are from all over the world Chinese and European to translate into Arabic

Sacrifice has been made to the algorithm! Been subbed already, but liked and commented. I appreciate your content, such high quality!

Pls make a video on the battle of bhopal and delhi

Charlemagne and Irene could have literally just declared the Western and Eastern Roman Empires respectively. This makes me mad af 😂😅

@Hades_Orkos

2 жыл бұрын

Honestly pretty ridiculous

@laonch6073

2 жыл бұрын

No? He missed so much land from the actual "Western Roman Empire" that it's almost ridiculous... Don't forget literally illirya, the rest of Spain, England, and well, Africa

@youvebeengreeked

2 жыл бұрын

@@laonch6073 I meant more in status rather than physical boundaries.

@laonch6073

2 жыл бұрын

@@youvebeengreeked even status wise, it wasn't an empire like the WRE used to be, he didn't start any process of Romanisation (or Frankisation) (I mean, not many empires did that though). Status wise was just a big chunk of land, without a centralised or consolidated power. What then makes it similar or comparable to what the WRE was?

@aurelian2668

2 жыл бұрын

@@laonch6073 Yeah like in comparison was the franks even really roman? They did not have roman culture instead have a mixed one.

Sad how his empire fractured just after his death.

@AlexC-ou4ju

2 жыл бұрын

it lasted at least trough his son Louis the Pious, who ruled for 27 years, it wasn't quite alexander and the diadochi

@nervachadikus

2 жыл бұрын

@@AlexC-ou4ju Yeah but Louis barely held it together and by the end of his reign his sons were tearing the empire apart for the second time

@prs_81

2 жыл бұрын

Charlie got the mil stats high but didn't do enough cul tech to reach past gavelkind. A newbie mistake if you ask me

Excellently done, keep up the good work!

Amazing! Keep up the hard work.

Good new style of video! It's good to vary the content to include non-battle videos too. Looking forward to part 2!

@HistoryMarche

2 жыл бұрын

Glad you enjoyed!

I've been wanting a carolingian empire documentary for a while now 😳

Thank you! Keep it up HistoryMarche!

Don't forget to share the interaction of Charlemagne with Muslim sultan Haroon Al Rasheed

One might say that Charlemagne was the founding father of the german monarchy even though some may argue that Otto the first was the actual one, however, Charlemagne was definitely not the founding father of France since we had numerous rulers before him, starting with Clovis who is regarded as the founding father of the french monarchy by french historians and the French people.

@DeutschlandMapping

2 жыл бұрын

Well some French nationalist argue that the Frankish Empire and the Kingdom of France were the same with East Francia becoming independent from the Empire rather then the Empire splitting up into East and West.

@katsuieshibata7493

2 жыл бұрын

@@DeutschlandMapping From Hugh Capet to Phillip Augustus, all the kings titled themselves "King of Franks". Would you consider them Frankish or "French".

@DeutschlandMapping

2 жыл бұрын

@@katsuieshibata7493 Charlemagne held the title of "Roman Emperor". Was he Roman? No.

@katsuieshibata7493

2 жыл бұрын

@@DeutschlandMapping So they were not Franks, then they were French? What makes Hugh Capet French and his predecessors not?

@skiteufr

2 жыл бұрын

@@katsuieshibata7493 the Franks of Hugh Capet and the French from Philip Augustus are the same people. Only the name has been changed or modernised. The territory called Kingdom of the Franks and the people called France at the beginning of the reign of Philip are exactly the same than those at the end of his reign

FINALLY! Finally someone started Charlemagne in proper!

Thank you for your hard work, really awesome videos.

Living for the day when a "historical" video calls the Empire Roman and not Byzantine.

@canadious6933

2 жыл бұрын

@Drake Hashimoto (MV) I second your opinion. However one question I would like to put out there for anyone who would like to clarify. But since the Byzantium is the Eastern Roman Empire, why did they have an issue with a new Emperor in the west? Since before the fall of west rome, there was 2 emperors already. I get that the pope was trying to delegitimize the East but if they remembered their own history, Constantinople was always the "second" part of rome.

@maxion5109

2 жыл бұрын

@Drake Hashimoto (MV) yes this seems to be an ongoing argument. I dont mind the label since the ERE at that point was quite a different beast from the previous years of classical urban society around the mediterranean, at least culturally. There was a lot of draining of what was Roman or non-Christian during Justinians reforms in the 6th century, the closing of the Academy of Athens and the end of the so called "Second Sophistic". After that a new kind of identity was created for society in the east which i think with some justification can be called Byzantine.

@maxion5109

2 жыл бұрын

@@canadious6933 but it became the "New Rome" after the WRE fell. So there is always just one "Rome". But it's true there were two emperors and before that the Tetrarchy after Diocletians reform with a senior and junior emperor in both west and east. I assume this is about an issue that there could only be one Christian emperor after Constantine the Great but im not entirely sure. Well Charlemagne was probably viewed as an imposter by the Byzantines as this Frankish strongman could not claim any direct line as they could in the east

@swaythegod5812

11 ай бұрын

Greeks aren’t Roman Constantinople isn’t Rome They spoke Greek not Roman Latin

Of course, the “Holy Roman Empire” would get divided eventually like all other pretenders to the Roman legacy. With a style of Emperor selection being just as bad as the “Byzantine” way of selecting an Emperor.

Looking forward to part 2.

Charlemagne the great !!!

Is it true he had 500 or 5000 Germanic warriors beheaded because they won't submit to Christianity?

@isakhanofbengal5936

2 жыл бұрын

How sad

@jackparker8602

2 жыл бұрын

Yes. It's called the Massacre of Verden. And they were all Saxon nobles.

@assyrianempire4341

2 жыл бұрын

Pagans killed Christians…Christians killed pagans 🤷‍♂️ thats history

@asgeer5351

2 жыл бұрын

Yes.

Fun fact: Even do the Byzantines were the heirs of the Roman Empire, they didin't have the administrative traditions nor the customs of the Ancient Romans, while the Holy Roman Empire shared tons of traditions with the Ancient Roman culture and customs. Irene of Athens got to be a "Basilissa Satora" thanks to the Hellenistic customs and administrative practices of the Byzantines yet a women in the throne was seign as wholy wrong by the ancient Romans and Holy Romans.

@sauronmordor7494

2 жыл бұрын

a ok

@user-ll9hb3sd8h

2 жыл бұрын

@Marcelo Henrique Soares da Silva Until 476 maybe. Afterwards the Byzantines were deeply Hellenized.

@sauronmordor7494

2 жыл бұрын

@Marcelo Henrique Soares da Silva ;o

Thank you love your work keep it up

A most excellent video! Well done

He is the Father of All europeans and Father of Cross and Christianity

"The Holy Roman Empire was neither holy, nor Roman, nor an empire"

@robertgrochowski687

2 жыл бұрын

100% truth.

@anantawibawa5315

2 жыл бұрын

yeah i agree with that

I enjoyed this so much, magnificent work

I love your channel. Keep your work and good luck!

When "Holy Roman empire" was actually an "empire".

@heroe480

2 жыл бұрын

And Holy

@JuTakii

2 жыл бұрын

@UCDvp9RkhpTl45oWatdqbB0g why are you being so rude about it, just summarize it yourself or say nothing. No need to be so cross.

"The Empress was notorious for having blinded and murdered her own son." So this is the medieval version of Karen?

The best Channel for War History and is never biased, great job. Do make a Documentary about Ghazva Khandak !

Sacrificies made ;) Awesome video, well made and explained. The history topic is getting a good traction on YT and we get deepened knowledge thanks to ppl like you. Thanks!

@HistoryMarche

2 жыл бұрын

Thank you sir. Much appreciated!

Charlemagne's France: Rule over 8 countries in today times The Roman Empire: Pathetic

Being the Roman emperor is not just about controlling a huge land. Roman Empire died in the west in 6th century and some guy declared himself it's Emperor 3 centuries later, really funny. But in the east, the Roman Empire kept living during that time with the name "Roman Empire" not Byzantium. And when the Emperor in Constantinople died and a woman was declared the Empress, this guy saw an opportunity and asked Pope to declare him the Emperor instead. Because according to Franks a woman can not rule. So this Charlemagne is just a sexist usurper not an Emperor

@sandboxaccountz.zy.7012

2 жыл бұрын

Moreover nobody is talking about the fact that Christianity was brought to others by force, 30 years of wars left and right. Odd, but its a hypocracy cause everyone is fast to say that Islam was forced on poeple but this here what he did in 30 years nobody mentions

@juancarlosdegoya2757

2 жыл бұрын

Sorry friend, but you don't get to choose, he was named Emperor, became Emperor, and even Irene of Athens the Empress wanted to marry him to unite the East and West.... Because he was the Emperor, the only reason this did not come to be was because her advisor feared he would lose his influence, and poisoned her ear.

@tylerellis9097

2 жыл бұрын

@@juancarlosdegoya2757 No she didn’t you goof. She proposed marrying him cause she was an usurper herself who was unpopular in Constantinople and about to be deposed so she needed a power base to support her. And even if she did marry him she was too old to have kids so his claim wouldn’t have increased either. Her successor Nikephoros recognized him as emperor of the Franks but not the Romans.

@juancarlosdegoya2757

2 жыл бұрын

@@tylerellis9097 Oh yes she did, you just said so yourself, she proposed marrying him, do you think she would propose marrying him if she didn't want to? It's no secret to nobody that her intentions were purely ambitious, and no she wasn't a usurper, by your logic her being an unfertile userpor made her incapable of being Emperess anyway

@tylerellis9097

2 жыл бұрын

@@juancarlosdegoya2757 You completely ignored my comment. Irene proposed marrying him so he could keep her in power. She blinded and deposed the Legitimate Isaurian Emperor her son Constantine VI who was recognized in the West. Her mismanagement of the economy, failure against the Arabs, unpopular restoration of the icons and her blinding of Constantine meant that she got deposed herself in 802 after a mere 5 year solo reign and hardly a year after she proposed the marriage.

Oh my god I’m so ready for this

Another fantastic vid from one of my top 3 history channels :)

My wife is actually a distant descendant of Charlemagne

@makahmed7130

2 жыл бұрын

Does your wife have younger sister ?

@shahsaud2625

2 жыл бұрын

@@makahmed7130 Jesus man

@kaldirdimgobegi

2 жыл бұрын

Wtf

Charlemange was the first Frenchman to unite most of Europe under his rule.

@AeneasGemini

2 жыл бұрын

To be fair, he did better than the second one

@freewal

2 жыл бұрын

@@AeneasGemini England was not interfering in French/Frankish affairs back then. They were too Weaks. Charlemagne reign is a golden age for Europe. Like Napoleon.

@marvicwhitehorse8766

2 жыл бұрын

Charlemagne was not French. He has little in common with the French and his relationship to them is as a man who ruled over them from a foreign Germanic elite.

@freewal

2 жыл бұрын

@@marvicwhitehorse8766 French people is historically a mix of Latin and Germanic people …

@marvicwhitehorse8766

2 жыл бұрын

@@freewal No, the French are a mix of Celtic, Latin and in northern France some Germanic influences. Charlemagne was extracted from a Frankish elite which was purely Germanic, which makes him significantly more closely related to Germans, Anglo-Saxons and other Germanic groups than to the French.