30 minutes of this channel gives me more motivation than 3 weeky of my studies at university.

Why aren't there millions subscribed to this channel? Love every episode, so glad I found it.

@SpittinSquirell

3 жыл бұрын

Most people are glued to the TV or social media and the drama it brings. They don't want to search for truth.

@2Worlds_and_InBetween

3 жыл бұрын

yup

@marilynjacobson5099

3 жыл бұрын

)Llllll)lpl)l

@marilynjacobson5099

3 жыл бұрын

)Llllll)lpl)l

@monstadable

3 жыл бұрын

Because intelligent life is rare

I agree with Dr. Krauss. There is way more that we do not understand than things we do understand. It's a great time for discovery and invention.

@oskarngo9138

3 жыл бұрын

That may be so.... ...but there just is Not enough fuel/resources on Earth to sustain humans long enough to find out (most) of those questions!

@JerseyLynne

3 жыл бұрын

Creepy kraus

@bryanguilford6145

3 жыл бұрын

@@oskarngo9138 Thats why humans will leave earth.

@oskarngo9138

3 жыл бұрын

Bryan Guilford You have been brain-washed by “Star Trek”! There is Not enough fuel/energy on earth to transport billions of humans interstellar. Space = Death!

@bryanguilford6145

3 жыл бұрын

@@oskarngo9138 No, we just need new technology. The same tech the aliens have..

Amazing series, all the heavy hitting questions. Thanks for making these

@stlkngyomom

3 жыл бұрын

This is but a lukewarm soap water in comparison to Jeffrey Mishlove's(New Thimking Allowed)channel. My opinion,I could be wrong,you be the judge(Paul Harrel:)...

@mikaelblomberg8614

3 жыл бұрын

@@stlkngyomom Thank you for the recommendation, will check it out as well. It's like an itch that just won't go away

@davefk

3 жыл бұрын

I agree. Great questions, and answers to some of those impossible answers.....

@pabloc2741

3 жыл бұрын

👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

@stlkngyomom

3 жыл бұрын

@@mikaelblomberg8614 My pleasure,I've left more related info on another thread,look for"narrator's sense of humor".

Robert Lawrence Kuhn is the best. Closer to Truth is close to my heart.

There isn't enough good things to say about this program. It's genuine, none biased and it hits to the deepest questions of reality. Keep up the great work Robert.

It´s not "Beyond Physics", it´s "Beyond current concepts" ;) Btw. Thank you for the undogmatic content from a scientific perspective! Instant subscribe

@balkrushnakhare5516

2 жыл бұрын

Absolutely trur

@waldwassermann

Жыл бұрын

Correct.

Excellent.... especially the analysis & conclusion by Distinguished Dr Robert L Kuhn... thanks 🙏.

@ergia4822

3 жыл бұрын

There is no conclusion, only more questions for which there are no answers yet because suppressing obvious evidence leads to ignorance.

i like how every interview takes place in different places

When it comes to the truth, the answer is just another question.

@ericwoodson717

3 жыл бұрын

The key is to not ask the question. Just take very powerful psychadelics and stfu.

@Therealskxlls

3 жыл бұрын

Absurd

@thegoodlistenerslistenwell2646

3 жыл бұрын

@@ericwoodson717 is that a joke about hippies or something?

@thegoodlistenerslistenwell2646

3 жыл бұрын

@@hyperduality2838 except there is a problem. And that's that we find Asymmetry in nature. So its possible a duality is not need at every point.

@thegoodlistenerslistenwell2646

3 жыл бұрын

@@hyperduality2838 why is there regular matter? We suspect they was an equal amount of anti matter....so how can we be here?

Dear Robert, thanks again for those very high quality interviews. Let me try to show some perspective from science philosophy. Please excuse me if it is something that you are already familiar with. Our idea that scientific progress would probably reach an end (a final theory) is biased because of our imprisonment within some paradigm. Paradigms do reach a limit of understanding, and when we are on the edge of the paradigm, we really think we are very close to an end, still very far. So we feel some anguish. But the paradigm is only a set of fundamental axioms and postulates, that will allow lots of development in its beggining and face a tough time in its end. Thomas Kuhn stated that, when acquiring a paradigm, the scientific and intellectual community also acquires a criterion for choosing problems that, as long as the paradigm is accepted, will be considered as having a possible solution. If we are on the edge of a paradigm, we are not on the edge of proper knowledge about reality, bot only on the edge of the paradigm's limits. When we could adhere to a new paradigm, we feel relief, but it is only because of the possibilities of another newbie set of axioms and postulates. It is not easy for us to recognize that our questions are conditioned by their own possible answers in a non causal relationship. Questions do only exist because we know how to ask. Best regards and thanks again. Best YT science channel ever.

@ivanleon6164

2 жыл бұрын

we will never reach limit of understanding.

@solonkazos1379

2 жыл бұрын

You are just adding more story to an evolutionary story. Neither one has any evidence.

@simesaid

2 жыл бұрын

@@ivanleon6164 You're _certain_ about that?

@solonkazos1379

2 жыл бұрын

@@simesaid Your not making any sense. I believe in God and science. They are not mutually exclusive. In fact God invented science. Man is the free moral agent which needs to be checked. See a man can look at something like a giraffe and say it must be related to a horse. Then over time the evidence comes in and we find out these two creatures are not close to similar. Their DNA is very different , bones are different, circular system is different, brains are different. Even the parts that look the same are different. In fact the whole common ancestry theory falls apart. Today it is rejected by science. This is why evolutionists have had to change their stories. Facts will ruin a good story.

@olivierrokks

2 жыл бұрын

@@solonkazos1379 another person who has no idea what the Theory of Evolution means or how it works. A fucking pandemic causing virus has literally evolved into multiple variants before our eyes but waahh I didn't come from monkeys 😢😢😢. Jfc. 😒

Usually a straight faced production, but I like your editor's sense of humor at 3:33.

@WhoDeanyUnchained

3 жыл бұрын

🤭🤭🤭

@Zoharargov

3 жыл бұрын

Nice! Well spotted! :)

@joshuaadamstithakayoutubel2490

3 жыл бұрын

The guy standing there?

@stlkngyomom

3 жыл бұрын

Well,he could be an diabolicus advocati,or he just may be familiar with entheogeongens: Manifesting The Mind,Vice Ibogaine,MAPS,Erowid,etc... Or he may know about"altered states of consciousnesses"like;mediation (binaural beats),tummo(Wim Hoff,Allan Watkins),.tulpa,yoga & yoga nidra,lucid dreaming(Robert Waggoner,Stephen La Berge,...),past lives regression(Bruce Greyspn,Brian Weiss,IAND's,...),seeing without eyes(Frank Elaridi,To. Canpbell,...),remote viewing(Jeffrey Mishlove,Russel Targ,Edgar Cayce,...) Who knows?

@theoratorjs

3 жыл бұрын

Well spotted- hand over face 😂

Good episode just watched on Beyond Physics, Robert Kuhn! I think dr. Krauss is getting it. Compare to the other opinions.

11:50 😂👏 One of the most brilliant things I've ever heard. Instead of "Laws" "Habbits"...that have evolved over a very long time.

"if you asked that question a hundred years ago you'd have been put in a lunatic asylum."

@pabloc2741

3 жыл бұрын

👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

@nvmffs

3 жыл бұрын

What question is that? Sorry, I don't enough time to watch the whole video

@pikiwiki

3 жыл бұрын

@@nvmffs does the universe exist in many different states at the same time

@MarkRuslinzski

3 жыл бұрын

Exactly

What's very interesting too is that these theories seem to form in the imagination first and then materializes. Not just through what observed almost like something is calling us to discover it on a timeline. Like we are the universe discovering it's own consciousness.

@johnkean6852

2 жыл бұрын

If you do this at School they throw a (hardback) book at you for day dreaming 🤣

@ivanleon6164

2 жыл бұрын

is not actually like that, is not imagination isolated, is imagination applied to try to explain something that is not explained, at the end nature is the input and the final judge. and the other part yes, someone say, we are just the universe looking at itself.

@solonkazos1379

2 жыл бұрын

I think your the universe and man are waiting to be discovered. Science is pointing to God creating everything. We need to stop with evolutionary stories that have no evidence.

@Ascendlocal

2 жыл бұрын

@@solonkazos1379 says who? To the contrary. Pointing to God is a regressive argument, ie, who or what created God. God-of-the-gaps is a cop out

@erawanpencil

11 ай бұрын

Yes, anyone who spends time thinking about QM and GR ends up realizing we’re just the universe looking at itself, information reflecting itself. After all, what are we but ‘part’ of the universe? I think Penrose is right that gravity is linked somehow to how things become one thing or the other, that there are base universal constants revealing the frequency of reality we see.

Krauss won a lot of respect from me here.

@mr.mystery1179

3 жыл бұрын

What made ya say that?

Closer to truth. I so appreciate your digging in and grinding through our science, religion...and whatever it is that makes us conscious human beings.The Truth of All Things...my mission statement.

Best episode yet! Lawrence Krauss is brilliant!

@Ascendlocal

2 жыл бұрын

Certainly.y one of the best episodes because it brings together a number of leading conceptual ideas outside the norm. FYI. Lawrence Krause is now shunned by his peers, book publishers and other cancel culture sensitive institutions and enterprises. Seems he had a slight problem when interacting with one of his female students. Even Sean Carroll made a snide remark about Krause. I’m not making a commentary, other than he was/is, one of the brightest in his field.

Love this channel...thanks for taking us with you in this journey

This is one of those channels that I love to break away from this reality & ponder other possibilities. Thanx for such a different series, my friend!

"What's beyond Physics?" The part of physics we haven't uncovered, yet.

@chunkycornbread4773

3 жыл бұрын

Thank you. You might as well ask "what don't we know yet?"

@johnbrzykcy3076

3 жыл бұрын

@@chunkycornbread4773 Even what I do know is fading away due to chemo-brain. Then I won't know what I do know.

@MeppyMan

3 жыл бұрын

The name of this video and the intro made me think it was a pseudoscience video.

@Etothe2iPi

3 жыл бұрын

Well said! My answer would be "new physics".

@richardcarew4708

3 жыл бұрын

my father used to say==>> the more I know, the more I know that I don't know I found this to be true..

Morphic resonance, what a beautiful concept, beautifully explained.

I enjoy this series, the appearances of characters like Lawrence Kraut and the bottomless pit discussions about religion notwithstanding

I love that he brings up conciousness. Suprise. The soul is fact not faith. The soul is quantum mechanical in nature.

wow. Paul Davies blew my mind. haven't heard that idea before but I think he's completely right.

thank you for interviewing Sheldrake.

Isaac Asimov said he believed knowledge was "fractal in nature." I would infer from that, it is (exponentially) new questions all the way down. Philosophers and scientists will have job security till the end of time.

@matthew944

3 жыл бұрын

Or at least until Multivac goes online.

@SpittinSquirell

3 жыл бұрын

I agree

@thomasridley8675

3 жыл бұрын

There will always be gaps for science and our imaginations to fill.

@richardcarew4708

3 жыл бұрын

Science is measuring the Universe... it's not blah blah blah.. unless you don't mind ideas like a universe that fits in one of my dots... in which case.. it's not science.. it's magic

@richardcarew4708

3 жыл бұрын

@@John-ir4id does one get paid for philosophizing?

This Channel is too good to be real. Love the quality and content

Brave man getting in a pool with Krause.

Definitely one of my favorite STEM etc. channels. It really should have more subscribers.

thank you for this ... really enjoyed this one ..

He is the Anthony Bourdain of science. I love his spirit of inquiry and his accompanying narrative.

Great video. Thank you! 💯

Very informative! 👍❤

Wonderful presentation. Complex matters dealt in simple understandable language. Loved it. I tend to agree with the proposed idea of consciousness which will make the universe a living entity and not a slave to physical laws. This has to be approached with an open mind with a realisation that complete truth is yet to be revealed. Maybe a little less of rigidity and a little more of humility might help. I also tend to agree that the universal laws which govern the working of our universe would be simp,e rather than complex. Great presentation.

13:50 he's describing a fractal. Wow, he just blew my mind with morphic resonance. It aligns and expands on my own intuitions.

If 400 years of discoveries would be sufficient to know how this world works it would mean that creator of this world was rather simple being.

@Zen_Power

3 жыл бұрын

We are just a Petri dish evolving whilst the creator is sitting back watching and eating popcorn and laughing.

@grattata4364

3 жыл бұрын

It all depends on the tool used to figure out how it works, which is our brain. Complexity is all relative. What is the universe to an ant? The human brain may be at the top level of complexity, fully capable to figure out things that are of similar complexity, like the universe. But that doesn't mean that it's simple, just that we're in the end game so to speak.

@yigitgenc1734

3 жыл бұрын

@@charlieboy2587 When you think about it first it had to take 3.5 billion years for the mind to evolve that could maybe answer the question in 400 years.

@yigitgenc1734

3 жыл бұрын

​@@charlieboy2587 No no just saying that if 400 years of discoveries would be sufficient it wouldn't actually be 400 years because there is more than that.

I'm with Rupert. Physics evolves. Like, the speed of light is, in a way, faster now than it was a billion years ago. I think this because of expansion. Light doesn't travel a mile any faster than it ever did but, a mile is now longer than it was in the beginning. Everything is expanding together so we don't see it. There's no way to gain perspective. We'll need a way to disconnect from the universe and see what it does without us. From the outside looking in. I think as the universe gets bigger, new smaller things are added. Maybe by a designer, a programmer and yes, maybe a creator. When we finally get close to finding the smallest thing in the universe, the building block of everything, a new and invisible smallest thing will be added. Something for us to continue to look for.

Love this guy !

Whats beyond physics? Life and biology. Its all right here - right in front of us. Life is the answer. Life breaks the cycle of determinism.

The more we understand what exists beyond our current understanding, the more we will discover about the paranormal and supernatural

brilliant series

Love this channel!!!

This channel is GOLD.⚱️

Very Good discussion.

I like this channel partly because of the mostly mature and relative comments.Some you agree some you don't however-apart from individuals with irrelative and non-scientific political agenda's -all worth reading...

Iam obcessed with this series

As much as finding “answers” is pleasurable, personally playing with the the questions to be more so. Guess that sentiment is simply a reformulation of “ooh, shiny!”

the only reason i listen to mr. kuhn is because he has a hypnotic voice and it puts me to sleep.

Kuhn on Sheldrake: "conjuring up organising principles that almost certainly do not exist". The term "almost certainly" is the standard put down in the absence of a better theory.

@all_is_1485

3 жыл бұрын

Borderlands the sheer pomposity and arrogance of his statement. I wonder if he feels the same way about quantum entanglement!

@borderlands6606

3 жыл бұрын

@@all_is_1485 I find the premise of the series less than honest. It often seems like a desperate attempt to shore up a bankrupt materialist model, or at least frame materialism as a gold standard against which other philosophies are judged. There is no attempt to address why Sheldrake's model is flawed, it's an easy scalp to add to the narration of wholesale doubt. The series is about materialist metaphysics, not true scepticism. It reminds me of Dawkins' claim that "God almost certainly does not exist", without any attempt at statistical likelihood or philosophical rigour.

@msimp0108

3 жыл бұрын

Borderlands couldn’t have said it better. Thanks

@mikemoore9694

3 жыл бұрын

It should be easy to design an experiment to prove ‘morphic resonance’ exists. Sheldrake hasn’t published as far as I know. I wonder why?

@borderlands6606

3 жыл бұрын

@@mikemoore9694 It would only be easy if it functioned within the limitations of reductionist materialism. I don't believe Sheldrake is suggesting it works in that billiard ball paradigm. You have to believe matter exhausts reality in its entirety to adopt that approach.

It might all come down to the sensitivity and complexity of our measuring instruments. And we have just begun our trip up the steep learning curve of ever-evolving computing power.

@chester-chickfunt900

Жыл бұрын

CG Jung would like the morphic resonance idea...excellent description of the Collective Unconscious and its effect on our minds.

Fascinating

Wonderful episode🙂 Rupert Sheldrake’s Morphic Fields hypothesis is brilliant👍

Excellent..... thanks 🙏.

really great most reasonable minded person to me in all the programmes

Great.....this one of your best.....wonderful...

Such a great channel

Love the theories

I am sure we will make progress on these questions. I wonder though whether it will be in the near future, or whether on the comtrary we can expect a fallow period in our progress comparable to that between Classical Greece and the Scientific Revolution!

Thanks for the share. This is most definitely one of the best pieces on youtube.

@johnbrzykcy3076

3 жыл бұрын

But do these "best pieces" solve the puzzle?

@toued4714

3 жыл бұрын

@@johnbrzykcy3076 Yes if you relate to the optimal performance of your brainpower. lmao

Very interesting video. One can learn from cradle to grave. Bravo. 👍

Great video and great topic. I have often thought about this myself. What major discoveries do we not know that future scientists will discover. What do we believe now that is totally wrong. Will we ever know everything? Personally I don't think we ever will.

@maxwellsequation4887

3 жыл бұрын

We never will, because nature is infinitely magnificent

@harishsk8014

11 ай бұрын

Impossible, we never can.

Thank you 🙏 appreciate the brain 🧠 tickles 🤗

There is so much beyond physics. So much that we have no idea how much there is beyond it. We already know that metaphysics is beyond physics, but that is just the start.

Consciousness is the elephant in the room that the mainstream thinkers are ignoring.

David Chalmers' ideas go up to eleven!!

I believe that consciousness is the missing link between nothingness and creation. In a looping Darwinian evolutionary circle which is also including space and time in its intermediate steps.

@GeoCoppens

3 жыл бұрын

You don't know what the hell you are talking about!!! Pure and utter rubbish!

@richardsnodgrass8647

3 жыл бұрын

I also but without Darwin in the present understanding of thought of Darwin.

@GeoCoppens

3 жыл бұрын

@zempath Rubbish!

@thoel1

3 жыл бұрын

@@GeoCoppens Good evening my flatten-er...

@GeoCoppens

3 жыл бұрын

@@thoel1 Too dumb for words!

You guys are legend.

Thanks

A good show and closer to the truth I hope

Robert truely is truth seeker with golden voice.

This is quickly becoming my favourite show

Art 🤩

I'm watching again tomorrow.

A video on entropy please dr Kuhn??? 😁♥️♥️

More “physics” is probably beyond “physics”

Thanks for this episode, only for the mention, Roger Penrose and David Deutsch could have added more here.

Rupert Sheldrake's "morphic ressonance" sounds like it came straight out of ancient Greek philosophy.

Best episode for me in the moment!! No boundaries.. Just surprises..

Loving these long-form videos. Great job!

Lawrence Krauss is the type of man to have to take a piss but instead of going to the bathroom, he invites Robert into a hot lake so they can keep the interview going while he relieves himself.

@superduck97

3 жыл бұрын

Yaser Masood ”just” a sexual freak? Nothing else? That’s sounds so dumb. You sound like you have been offended by Krauss. :)

@superduck97

3 жыл бұрын

Yaser Masood He might have given himself a bad rep. Not science. Just as you’re doing now. Your agenda is obvious and somewhat outdated. :)

@GuitarDog_atx

3 жыл бұрын

@@yaserthe1 What's arrogant is to believe that your invisible friend created a billion galaxies just for you. Speaking of sexual transgressions, maybe you should read the bible. Maybe look at the leaders of the Abrahamic religions. Only fanatics think science has a bad name, or that one creep can do this.

Sheldrake is a legend.

No better place to talk of physics than iceland

@bartholomewtott3812

3 жыл бұрын

than

@shazanali692

10 ай бұрын

​@@bartholomewtott3812cool. Sorry for my spelling

Physics is everything.

I have loads of these and I am still none the wiser however at least Rupert Sheldrake does sound poetic even if I have no idea what he is on about.

Physics is a man made tool for analyzing the physical world. Using that tool we are constantly learning new things associated with the physical world. Our tool is always being improved, and our concepts often changed based on new understanding. For all practical purposes, the universe (with or without anything that may exist beyond), is infinite to us. In other words, our field of discovery is endless and it seems highly likely physics will stick with us till the last physical mystery is unraveled.

I agree with him , inside the quarks , you have the znorts , & so on .

All that the themes discussed here are beautifully presented in an upcoming book, Dreamaker, on December 2020

Reality is that we are only going to learn as much as God will let us learn!

Something like this........😁. The rules of quantum mechanics are fundamental. They assert that the state space of a system is a Hilbert space (crucially, that the space has an inner product) and that observables of the system are Hermitian operators acting on vectors in that space - although they do not tell us which Hilbert space or which operators. These can be chosen appropriately in order to obtain a quantitative description of a quantum system. An important guide for making these choices is the correspondence principle, which states that the predictions of quantum mechanics reduce to those of classical mechanics when a system moves to higher energies or, equivalently, larger quantum numbers, i.e. whereas a single particle exhibits a degree of randomness, in systems incorporating millions of particles averaging takes over and, at the high energy limit, the statistical probability of random behaviour approaches zero. In other words, classical mechanics is simply a quantum mechanics of large systems. This "high energy" limit is known as the classical or correspondence limit. One can even start from an established classical model of a particular system, then try to guess the underlying quantum model that would give rise to the classical model in the correspondence limit

Great

Consciousness is everything , physics are inside mind , not outside 💓

Magic!

@JoeBuck-uc3bl

5 ай бұрын

Johnson?

Why can't we just appreciate that all that exist is infinity and everything can, and exist in infinity?

If we are until now don't know the right questions you can only imagine how far we are from the answers.

Beyond Physics is the Supernatural.

A mystical experience under the effects on psychedelics makes a presentation such as this significantly more understandable.

I like your closer to truth, 100Nu.

Has Paul Davies ever considered that the physical Universe we occupy is just the theoretical opposite of what's outside of it? What's outside of our physical universe likely turned inside out at the time of the big bang.