How embarrassing and disgraceful it is that people who are in charge literally know nothing about the things they are forcing onto the general public, despicable.

@stilllearning1160

3 ай бұрын

At best it makes them easily manipulatable.

@troofinadvertising

3 ай бұрын

So global warming is a myth? Does the knowledge of Congress change the facts? You're scared, so you're dissembling.

@yrreteugarps2835

3 ай бұрын

Remember their chant "Follow the science!" Pretty sure science could bite them on the @$$ and they wouldn't recognize it.

@torylynne

3 ай бұрын

That's what happens when Congress is only the first step to the big money with lobbyists and govt/private partnership. Follow the money.

@ChrisW-te1rb

3 ай бұрын

Politics as usual

The ignorance of the so called experts is absolutely overwhelming.

@SingleTax

Жыл бұрын

Overwhelming, but far from surprising. The "climate cult" is called such for a reason. These people are literally insane.

@sparkyfromel

Жыл бұрын

the best one I've heard is during a house committee investigation , an oil CEO asking the head of the Environment Protection Agency "how come there is crude oil in the Arctic "...the guy shrugged and answered it must have migrated there " ......the oil man smiled and said nothing , he knew the oil was formed some millions years ago when the north pole was ice free and full of vegetation

@man_at_the_end_of_time

Жыл бұрын

@@sparkyfromel Are we talking the formation of crude oil or coal?

@sparkyfromel

Жыл бұрын

@@man_at_the_end_of_time oil and gas

@man_at_the_end_of_time

Жыл бұрын

@@sparkyfromel Ok that was a bit rhetorical of a question on my part. Oil and gas per the biogenic theory of origin comes from marine organisms not land plants. And how productive each region of ocean is for sediments resulting in kerogen once it is free of ice cover may not vary too wildly. As to global warming, there is a factor most ignore and that is the weakening of our planet's magnetic field. It maybe a much stronger factor than CO2. It is said by some most of the green house effect comes within the first couple of hundred ppm of CO2 such current increases in CO2 have negligible effects. Currently, I've not formed a strong opinion except that those who push the CO2 heating theory are a best poorly informed and at worst are pushing a false narrative for profit and even malice. Could the elites be correct? Maybe somewhat but even their solutions may be worse than the problem. I am more focused on WW3 (end times), economic crash, increasing of totalitarian controls, the Covid and Vaxx crimes being pushed by Facebook, the UN, the WHO, the UK,. the USA, China, etc, etc.

OMG what a incompetence. And those people are making decisions? We are moving to "Idiocracy".

@Mythhammer

3 ай бұрын

Moving? We are well past that stage.

@stargazer7644

3 ай бұрын

Can you explain to me the significance of being able to come up with this number? Can you tell me what percentage of radon in the air is considered hazardous by the EPA?

@Mythhammer

3 ай бұрын

@stargazer7644 The significance is these people claim to be experts. Yet they do not understand something as basic as that number. As for radon that's more EPA. Out doors normal background. Is roughly .4 pCi/L. Once that gets between 1 and 2 it's a concern. 4 is the EPA action level. How do I know thus? I Looked it up. The same as these so called experts should have.

@kawashima-yoshiko

3 ай бұрын

@@stargazer7644 the significance is children learn that at school. If they were unable to learn something specific for their job from school they aren’t even incompetent, they are just ignorant.

@stargazer7644

3 ай бұрын

@@Mythhammer These are politicians. They do not claim to be experts. They consult experts, and they make laws. You didn't answer the question I asked. What percent of radon in air is 4 pCi/L? What is the significance of that number? Why is it 4 and not 2, or 400? You're demonstrating my point. The fact that you were able to pull 4 out of the internet doesn't tell you anything about the significance of that number. Even if one of the reps had uttered 400 parts per million, that wouldn't mean they know any more than you do why 4 pCi/L is significant, or have any idea how that relates to a percentage of radon in air.

All he really needed to ask was "Who finances your research" that will tell you everything about what that panel are up to. Embarrassing they didn't know the answer to his first question

@Showmetheevidence-

3 ай бұрын

Yes. Good point!

@wheelsofafrica

3 ай бұрын

97% of scientists discover what they are paid to discover!

@stevejones2310

2 ай бұрын

​@@wheelsofafricathat's how the cigarette industry used to operate and the fossil fuel industry still does.

@ckush928

2 ай бұрын

He will never ask that because most of his campaign donations come from the oil industry.

@akmurf7429

2 ай бұрын

yup! Follow the cash. I remember Obama saying, "No one should own more than one house". He owns four the last I heard. All beach front mansions. This is after he was president. that should tell you all you need to know about most politicians. They go in pour, and come out rich. so the question is, where is the money coming from and why do you love it, more than your own people (country)?

Remarkable how ignorant these people are that push these green initiatives. I’m glad they got exposed.

@gossumx

Жыл бұрын

Help me understand what you mean. Is it that .04% is inconsequential? Here is an interesting Mythbusters clip on the idea. Their experiment also uses methane levels measured in parts per billion kzread.info/dash/bejne/ooSGxpeAhJPcYKw.html

@skydouglas996

Жыл бұрын

What is CONSEQUENTIAL is that fact that all this green social engineering is being driven by woke politicians who get their information from “experts” that don’t even know the basics, like the level of CO2 in the atmosphere. Thank you for showing that you have such a woke bias that you missed that most salient point.

@toomanyaccounts

Жыл бұрын

@@gossumx we have had much higher levels and the planet had far more life on it

@granolafunk6192

Жыл бұрын

@@gossumx One of them claimed transportation is 49% of CO2... Completely absurd.

@andrews.

Жыл бұрын

The voters are all still parroting these lies. So they continue to vote for the corruption thats pocketing the money. To be fair, it's not all bad. EPA/CARB has done some good but at what cost? It was all band-aid fixes. Now California roads are garbage, money spent elsewhere. Electrical Infrastructure is approaching 60 years behind upgrades. Now we need electric cars? California can not handle the ones we got. Locally a transformer blew up last week. Age? Life-cycle acceleration? Demand? Young voters are voting for this.

Rep. Doug LaMalfa exposed that Ship of Fools.

@samthing4thetrack806

Жыл бұрын

these are people making equipment not policy wonks, so they are not to blame

@yeost187

Жыл бұрын

@@samthing4thetrack806 Yet, they promote the fallacy, take the subsidies, and don't question it.. yeah, totally unrelated, its not their fault..🙄

@2sccopsofPoo4U

Жыл бұрын

Someone needs to take out all the Biden’s now. We need to stop f ing around and do it

@MH-lg1iu

Жыл бұрын

@@samthing4thetrack806 They are part of the policy process and yet they know nothing.

@bartsimpson8616

Жыл бұрын

regardes their bank accounts by merican system of ''values'' they aint so morons as they are in reality.

Can these people please resign immediately?

If this committee worked for me, they'd be gone the very next minute. You're all fired! Done, get out. Next.

@kawashima-yoshiko

Ай бұрын

I would propose them to breathe 5% CO2 air for half an hour. Just as an experiment.

My physics textbook from 1970 states CO2 is 0.04%. Now more than 50 years later the answer still is.....0.04%. (Edit: Now it is a year later and I have been inundated with replies (several hundreds). Some are polite and some are nasty and arrogant. I worked in a qualitative/quantitative/thermal analysis laboratory for 34 years at a large university. Please do not insist that atmospheric CO2 is never reported as a percent. That is incorrect. I had a state of the art Gas Chromatograph, and reports were always generated as percentages in scientific notation which makes sense because you cannot report "contents" in different units when the normalized total is 100%. Lastly, the original comment was a simple factoid which for some odd reason offends many people. I am 71, and if I said that "55 years ago I saw something unusual or interesting", why would you countermand it? It was a very simple statement that (at the time) I had no reason to disbelieve or believe; my life has not revolved around this textbook. My basic point is: why is everyone quibbling over 40 to 45 ppm of CO2? Please accept that IMO it is not harmful. If you have a different opinion that is fine with me. IMO, stating that CO2 has risen by a third in the last century means nothing to me. Stating it has risen by 45 PPM in the last 60 years is at least objective. Please refrain from posting comments that are not objective. Thank you.

@rkeith4442

Жыл бұрын

It's always been a big lie ! 😪

@LJA46

Жыл бұрын

@@rkeith4442 It's all about power and control, and money.

@grocker7683

Жыл бұрын

Gods pretty good at taking care of planets :)

@guillermoelnino

Жыл бұрын

but some day it might go up to 0.0401%. and we're going to pretend that's a bad thing.

@suvorovetz642

Жыл бұрын

@@guillermoelnino, it'll be a good thing, because it's good for vegetation, actually.

The ignorance of those who would presume to regulate our lives is staggering.

@shealdedmon7027

Жыл бұрын

It's not ignorance it's greed.

@wallyhunt

Жыл бұрын

Who is attempting to regulate our lives? Seems like anyone with power is on the fast track. The greenhouse effect was demonstrated around 1850. Oil and gas has known of global warming from burning fossil fuels since the 1950's. The issue started going public in the 1980's. Coincidentally the tobacco knew about addiction to nicotine and extreme health risks due to smoking in the 1950's but kept it out of the public discourse for decades. I graduated high school 1965. Despite their knowledge of health risks and probably because of the knowledge of addiction cigarette companies where handing out smokes at blue collar work places and marketing the hell out their product. Self interest over the good of all. That is who is attempting to regulate or avoid regulation that would change the flow of cash. Why are so many Americans ignorant of the whole picture? People commenting on this video seem, for the most part, to cling to and repeat only the stuff that suits their biases. One thing I would ask is just how much change to affect production of fossil fuels or change to an economy that is more sustainable have we seen and how much has it cost? By 1990 the US had spent $10 T on the nuclear portion of the cold war ($20 T in 2020 dollars). None of that benefited the ordinary American.

@The.Nasty.

Жыл бұрын

@@wallyhunt I agree, it’s flooring to see such ignorance en masse.

@rrkunath

Жыл бұрын

​@Wallace Hunt looks like you also are just clinging to what people you agree with are saying.

@AstrobumTV

Жыл бұрын

@@wallyhunt The cold war effort benefitted none? Are you a moron? Seems like you are. The birth of electronics industry that puts millions of people to work around the world stems from cold war. Inventions that stems from the space effort that originates from that same cold war puts another few millions of people around the globe to work. From chemicals industry to textiles to plastics. Even the chemical that turns your ordinary frying pan to nonstick ones came from that cold war. Clearly you can't see any of these since your IQ point is the same value as the CO2 in the atmosphere

On thing is for sure LaMalfa's got common sense. We just love our farmers!

@jonathanfields4ever

Ай бұрын

Common sense is often quite silly. This is a great example. 0.04% sounds like nothing, but that just means human contributions make a bigger difference. He’s making the exact opposite point of what he thinks.

I am so glad that KZread provides context notes for this. Man I would just be lost if they didn’t tell me how to think.

Democrats and common sense don't mix.

@barrythomas529

Жыл бұрын

Democraps and stupidity are one and the same. Can't fix stupid.

@VortexStolenName

Жыл бұрын

Democrats and sense dont mix.

@ACTHdan

Жыл бұрын

Oil and cents do

@budbud2509

Жыл бұрын

Yes cos its all done on emotion and NOT on science facts What a group of Thicko's

@davidcwatkins5956

Жыл бұрын

Oil and water, oil and water.

It’s a total humiliation that those panelists can’t answer such a simple question while wanting to impose $multi-billion laws. Frankly they should all resign.

@delreine2315

Жыл бұрын

Man, what a con job. The panelists not being able to answer that simple question masked the fact that rep LaMalfa's premise was total nonsense.

@snbforever

Жыл бұрын

Every politician around the world will be out of a job very soon. The Perfect Government is coming soon 😇

@marcfeldman8461

Жыл бұрын

I believe one was BOYD of Boyd Trucking, answering a Diesel question too.

@eonreeves4324

Жыл бұрын

It would appear as though our government is sabotaging its own country and they're doing it with useful idiots

@johnkonstantopoulos8192

Жыл бұрын

be executed you mean...

Thank you Mr. LaMalfa! We need more people like you!

@mathboy8188

3 ай бұрын

Dumb people in Congress? No, we already have more than enough.

Sad thing we lives in times where people who makes sense with truth are not listened to

If the people on the panel have any authority then America is stuffed.

@bartsimpson8616

Жыл бұрын

Dear sir , you got some optimistic expectation about that ??

@katiek.8808

Жыл бұрын

@@shaneanderson7757 it real doesn’t work that way. Some of it is that way but not even close to all. It’s a perfect storm of the greedy, ideological, and psychotic. We have bureaucrats with power you couldn’t imagine and they answer to no one.

@stewiesaidthat

Жыл бұрын

@Alexander Everhart the government exists to infringe on your God-given rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

@glidercoach

Жыл бұрын

Kind of explains everything that's going on in the US. Crime, the economy and it's getting worse. Creating and solving non existing problems for political gain is a recipe for disaster.

@williambyast7791

Жыл бұрын

As too Here in Australia!

If you rephrase "Ban CO2" as "Ban plant food", you see how ridiculous this whole agenda is.

@plantfeeder6677

Жыл бұрын

Me and my friends concur!

@glenw1740

Жыл бұрын

Just because co2 is necessary, it doesnt mean that more is good. The balance is important. If there were more fractionally more oxygen then fire wouldn't be extinguished and we'd all burn. So writing off climate change as bogus isnt a good idea either.

@ImTheKaiser

Жыл бұрын

Idiocracy

@puo2123

Жыл бұрын

With that sentence you just make yourself ridiculous because you show that you dont understand the topic. Bevore humans started burning fossile coal and gas plants already grew and the co2 concentration in the air was constant. So if we stop buring stuff plants will still grow. Like talking to a 4 year old kid...

@stacase

Жыл бұрын

BINGO! But "Pant Food" sounds silly especially if Christopher Monckton of Brenchley says it. But "Essential component of photosynthesis" is too much of a mouth full. I dunno there really needs to be some really good bumper sticker/sound bite to get the point across.

If that isn't an eye opener then what is?? 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

Nice work by LaMalfa, I've been impressed with him and happy he represents my district.

The man did his homework, good job Rep.

@BelloBudo007

Жыл бұрын

I do like an unstated guy. The subject though is too important to allow these drongoes to get away with goofing about like school kids that failed to study for the test. This video needs to go everywhere to expose their failings.

@paulrousseau9144

Жыл бұрын

@@BelloBudo007 Atmospheric carbon dioxide is very effective at trapping heat. The amount of CO2 has *_increased 50%_* over the past 100 years (from 280 to 420 ppm). That is catastrophic. Period.

@sergeikhoudiakov1914

Жыл бұрын

@@paulrousseau9144 please explain how increasing CO2 levels traps more heat

@GeoRyukaiser

Жыл бұрын

@@sergeikhoudiakov1914 It's high school level physics, I'm sure you could dig it up somewhere pretty easily. But in so doing also be sure to remember that 0.00006% of the atmosphere is responsible to blocking 99% of cosmic radiation. And also remember we are currently in a solar minimum (sun is colder) since 2019, which logically should result in atmospheric cooling... which isn't happening in our layer, only in the layers above the 0.00006% I mentioned earlier. Considering that that 0.00006% layer is currently growing, and that that growing should also cause cooling in our layer, it is clear that something is causing warming.

@sergeikhoudiakov1914

Жыл бұрын

@@GeoRyukaiser Nice of you not to explain. But since you seem to be an Ozone expert I'll re-phrase my question for you: Will doubling Ozon concentration block proportionally more cosmic radiation? How about x10?

"We have put together, i think, the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics." - Brandon

@suburbanconan

Жыл бұрын

Exactly.....and brought all his brain dead zombies with him. That clip of Creepy needs to go viral again.Subject him to the same rules they tried to apply to 45.

@Etymon-jt3zw

Жыл бұрын

" I don't need your vote to get into the office I need you after I get in the office " Joe Biden

@Tom-xh8yj

Жыл бұрын

The only truth Brandon ever told.

@louiscaeiroramos8051

Жыл бұрын

We will stop Northstream.

@jeremys6747

Жыл бұрын

But we can’t prove it so we just repeat this until all smooth brains agree

glad they thought it was funny ... gives us all a lot of confidence

And by an extraordinary coincidence, 0.04% also happens to be the collective IQ of this panel.

@ThirdFront

Жыл бұрын

man.. IQ is not measured in %, but I agree with the sentiment. One has to be special stupid to go on a panel on green initiative and not know % CO2 in atmosphere..

@LDU2U

Жыл бұрын

IQ of room temperature.

@larryzach7880

Жыл бұрын

I think you are being generous

@elisekuby2009

Жыл бұрын

You are overestimating!

@johnhynes5557

Жыл бұрын

No, thats not possible actually

We can't have these people make decisions for us anymore.

@gaylecoleman8567

Жыл бұрын

❤❤❤❤❤❤

@saywhat8966

Жыл бұрын

The first book of/on science is the Bible and it’s reliable.

@jasonb6315

Жыл бұрын

@@MrJohnL21 Only when this country self destructs and/or is destroyed by external forces. It appears to be terminal.

@wizardoffrobozz

Жыл бұрын

Representatives instead of leaders.

@TemporalWolf

Жыл бұрын

You realize these panelists are industry folks, not politicians or scientists, right? Mr. Boyd, for example, was there representing the National Stone, Sand & Gravel Association. Mr. Dreher was representing Associated Builders and Contractors. Y'all making fun of industry execs representing their respective business interests, who for the most part agree with you. Crazy how y'all will jump on anybody that looks like they might be "woke" without doing any actual thinking.

Thank you

❤ TRUTH is POWER ❤

How unfortunate that non-technical people are making technical decisions with no idea about what they are doing.

@DmitryShultz

Жыл бұрын

They are wrong only by 20000%, so there is still a very small chance they are not going to deliver well planned disaster 😂🤬

@tedthesailor172

Жыл бұрын

For "non-technical" read "uneducated"...

@lightpropulsionguy

Жыл бұрын

​@@tedthesailor172you can change uneducated to dastardly an that one one because reports on such numbers are hidden greatly from public view and access in order to push a warrantless agenda, like the man said, at 0.002% plant life becomes unsustainable, we're barely double that.

@littlebitofeverything8307

Жыл бұрын

Welcome to politics haha

@woodrowmagnus2535

Жыл бұрын

When have you ever known our government to know what they're doing?

Politicians are the only people who can get away with being this absurdly incompetent at their jobs.

@dasrite

Жыл бұрын

The job isn't about competence, it's about networking

@Bezerker1181

Жыл бұрын

Absolutely not! You are forgetting the media or better yet fake journalists. The incompetence starts where the "news" comes from, only after that do you take a look at the sources.

@MM-lu2zk

Жыл бұрын

I'd like to add WeatherMen.

@yokotaashi

Жыл бұрын

These politicians are not the ones considering themselves experts. That's why they have these hearings. This farmer clearly doesn't understand what he's talking about, he just found a random piece of trivia online and is parroting it. He literally says at 1:34 that .03 to .04 is a small change. Its actually 33% change if you do the math. I wouldn't expect a farmer to understand that though, nor the implications. It's probably best left to the climate experts.

@TortillaChip521

Жыл бұрын

@@yokotaashi wow 33% sounds like a lot when you forget it’s referencing a measurement in the ten-thousandths. Of course it’s easy to fool the public when manipulating the view of statistics, isn’t it?

Not knowing that is ridiculous

The empty seats of our tax Paid politicians always make me ask. WHAT?

This is crazy! How on earth is this level of ignorance acceptable from people who claims to know how we should live!?

@somejerk1520

Жыл бұрын

✡️s

@fxdx68

Жыл бұрын

what you say is so important. Here in France same problem, our leaders are so ignorants, it is scary.

@wizardoffrobozz

Жыл бұрын

The people who would vote emotionally will accept it, or he knows the truth but he's on some external payroll

@user-freetopg

Жыл бұрын

​Imma get u banned👊👌

@crabby7668

Жыл бұрын

They rely on advisers that supposedly are in the know. That is how these organisations get captured by idiots or people with an agenda to drive through. No one questions the narrative because they are too ignorant of the realities of science and other "reality based" subjects to have their warning bells rung (ie recognise a scam). Too many of the populace are also scientifically ignorant and will just believe anything they are told, providing it comes from the" right sources, tugs at their emotions, and is repeated enough.

A classic example of politicians introducing laws for things they totally don’t understand

@fiveowaf454

Жыл бұрын

It's the problem when decisions are made based on emotions rather than facts.

@robrandolph9463

Жыл бұрын

Mulvayny comes running down

@ladydi4537

Жыл бұрын

@alanrace4156 - Most of our lawmakers are 'Jack of all trades, but masters of none'. Money and emotion seem the rule. 🤔

@ILikeSkulls666

Жыл бұрын

All they understand is money and how much this new bill can make for them

@stroys7061

Жыл бұрын

I’m live in Michigan and suffered through the Gov Granholm era here. I worked in public utility regulation for 30 years. Granholm tried to impose a 90% reduction in mercury emissions from coal-fired electric power plants. When my agency and utility private sector experts informed her that the equipment to measure that level of emissions did not exist her response was “if we impose the regulation then the industry will invent the necessary instruments.” They still cannot measure mercury emissions that small. So of course Biden made her Secretary of DOE. She is an attorney with zero technical knowledge of energy.

...this is outrageous... none of them ever took time to check the validity of the concepts they are pushing?!! These people can be "used" by any lobbyist to do their bidding...

Rep. LaMalfa, you're one of the few remaining hopes in government we have left in CA. Thank you.

@larsord9139

Жыл бұрын

L S, We're lucky up here in his district. Northern California.

@larryzach7880

Жыл бұрын

It's to late goodbye Commiefornia

@maketheconstitutiongreatag5038

Жыл бұрын

Stop living in California and move to a solid red state. You're contributing to CA's 54 electoral votes just by living there. Get out, and starve the blue states of their power.

@fredorico41

Жыл бұрын

​@@larryzach7880 Yeah the whole of the US is screwed.

@tyronetrump1612

Жыл бұрын

don't worry give it some time , they are probably starting a smear campaign on him as we speak and will make him out to be a pedo, homophibic racist that tortures puppies

They want to set the rules, and claim to be the experts, but they don't understand the basics of the topic. What else is new?

@tiberianexcalibur

Жыл бұрын

They’re just executives passing on what their employees told them😂

@BeStillAcres

Жыл бұрын

Proof that a college education is worthless and ppl need to walk away from their indoctrination camps called “educational institutions.”

@JGreen-le8xx

Жыл бұрын

They spout what the WEF tells them to.

@ripvanrevs

Жыл бұрын

@@tiberianexcalibur Coincidentally, .04% is the exact amount of brain function the climate nutters have.

@grahamhodge8313

Жыл бұрын

Human induced climate change is an established fact; they don't need to go back to the fundamentals of it when discussing legislation. If you went to order carpet from a store would you expect the salesperson to ask if you knew how many square inches are in a square foot? Not relevant to the conversation.

That's right, some in Ca know and care, good on ya Brother!

The smartest people in the room "Experts" So sick of the establishment!! #DefundDC

It's like watching five year olds fix the world's biggest problems.

@abefrohman81

Жыл бұрын

There's a reason they made a 14 year old Swedish girl throwing a temper tantrum so she didn't have to go to school the face of the whole ridiculous movement.

@sirreepicheeprules7443

Жыл бұрын

I think even a five year old could do a better job than these idiots. These people are either horribly corrupt or ideologues hellbent on proving their case and enforcing their agenda no matter what they have to do.

@canyouhandlethetruth8682

Жыл бұрын

hey, don't insult the worlds 5 year olds against these donkeys!!!😁

@ferengiprofiteer9145

Жыл бұрын

World's biggest problems? If it was a real problem, they'd be dodging, ducking, and weaving.

@kekistaniattackhelicopter2242

Жыл бұрын

The best part is the so called climate change is not even a real problem to begin with.

All you have to do if you are wondering why America is falling hard...watch videos like these.

@nwttp

Жыл бұрын

I watch videos about female penis, or listen to our president talk to get that effect.

@obijuan3004

Жыл бұрын

America is falling hard because the republican's live off of an anger addiction. They have a long list of anger issues, gays, Mexicans, CRT (which doesn't exist in any K-12 school) grooming by teachers (also made up), Mini Mouse, M&M's, replacement theory, vaccinations, immigration, its one anger issue after another with those people. Yet, republicans know nothing about the science that is rapidly changing our economy and leading us to self-driving cars, artificial intelligence, robotics, modern medicines that work at a molecular scale. We need more immigrants to build more homes and reduce home prices, pick more food and reduce food prices, fill the 6 million open jobs in restaurants, hotels, farms and construction and PAY for millions of baby boomers on retirement. Republicans are addicted to anger about things that have ZERO effect on their lives. ZERO EFFECT ON THEIR LIVES. Republican are addicted to opioids and anger.

@melb5996

Жыл бұрын

Think yourselves lucky you don’t live in Europe.

@richardcrowe1429

Жыл бұрын

It’s not just America. It’s the west

@AceBanana100

Жыл бұрын

Indeed - and they still think we went to the moon!

Absolutely shocking!!!! How can these people be so ignorant?????😢😢😢

Fascinating

Why idiots like those allowed to make rules for the rest of the people? Why the people allowing this to happen?

@Dan-sc7us

Жыл бұрын

They are politicians NOT scientists!

@stepfaniehawkins205

Жыл бұрын

Because everyone's too afraid of the alternative

@jerrypeal653

Жыл бұрын

Why the people allowing it , aren’t you part of the people? Why are you allowing it to happen.

@noobandfriends2420

Жыл бұрын

They're "experts."

@darrelv764

Жыл бұрын

The answer is money to be made .there the answer in a nut shell

This should be shown to the world. They're advocating for someone they don't even understand.

@joshd79

Жыл бұрын

This whole comment section is people who don’t understand. CO2 is measured in PPM not %. Bunch of science illiterate folks crying hurrr durrr 0.4% is such a small number why does it matter? Well how about drink a cup of water with only 0.4% plutonium in it. I beg you please drink it

He nailedit

This speaks volumes for exposing the scientifically derelict minds of politicians

The ignorance of those who are causing so much damage to the economy, society and life on the planet is astounding!

@lisacarden1309

Жыл бұрын

Exactly 💯 watch the documentary The Dimming

@StopTargetingOurKids

Жыл бұрын

It's planned destrution, they don't care about the numbers because they already know it's not the problem

@pietro4772

Жыл бұрын

@@lisacarden1309 It is astounding that despite the evidence people ate still reluctant to believe we have been sprayed like roaches for decades through Stratospheric Aerøsol Injectıøn Campaıgns with heavy funding from uncle Bill and his geøengineering boyfriends. You're the only one I have seen in years recommending that documentary. I have it on my play list and point people to it often. Well done 👍 😎 👍

@tripe2237

Жыл бұрын

They're executives from transportation industries like railroad and trucking. It's not their job to know. Usually when you want to know something about the climate, you ask a climate scientist, not a 70 year old transportation executive.

@emmap1159

Жыл бұрын

They play dumb but they know it's a scam.

As an ex maths teacher (only for 10 years) I`m aware of the maths concepts that many pupils learned by rote for exams and never really understood. Percentages was one of them. Consequently the fact that CO2 at 0.04% is only 1 part in 2,500 of the earths atmosphere is completely missed.

I used to live in San Francisco and I'd ask that question to every vapid Climate Alarmist I met. Not once did they know the answer is 0.03-0.04%.

@wyattfamily8997

Жыл бұрын

And below .02 plants die.

@Barefoot433

Жыл бұрын

Exactly right.

@axeman2638

Жыл бұрын

the next question after that is now much does man contribute to CO2 levels, hint, it's insignificant.

@killerdoxen

Жыл бұрын

Research is hard for the fear mongers.

@kensmith5694

Жыл бұрын

It is now above 0.04% so you expected the wrong answer from them. We are at 429 PPM according to numbers I could find. BTW: In 1998 it was about 330PPM.

Knowledge is more accessible than ever, yet we seem to know less and less as time goes by...

The ignorance of these peoples is astounding ! !

For me growing up in The Netherlands in the 80s California was always synonymous for The American Dream but now it’s definitely The American Disaster.

@Carlos.Rivera

Жыл бұрын

Thanks to woke democrats

@erikstekelenburg3020

Жыл бұрын

The dream is gone....and I, have become comfortably numb! De Amerikaanse droom stuurt ons regelrecht 'down the drain'. In potentie geweldig volk, maar compleet geconditioneerd door de deep state, aka new world order.

@harrylazard805

Жыл бұрын

Leave it to the liberals....

@encinobalboa

Жыл бұрын

Living and seeing the disaster every day.

@douglemay7989

Жыл бұрын

@@Carlos.Rivera efine woke

When I was a child ( a long time ago) we were told that in under 50 years we would run out of oil and coal and then given all of the scary things that this would create. We were given lists of animals that would be extinct in 20 years, including tigers and elephants. We were told that sea levels would rise and London would be flooded, we were told we were heading for a new ice age and would all freeze to death, we were told that the ozone layer would be depleted within 100 years and we would all fry to death. You would think that they would have at least got one nearly right - unfortunatley due to simple entropy there are some animals that will die off, there will be various changes in climate and the natural world but killing off human beings through poverty and famine to try and stop it is clearly not the answer.

@scrappy7571

Жыл бұрын

I'm still waiting for the flying cars we were promised in the year 2000!!!

@stevehardwick7285

Жыл бұрын

Many of us have seen these radicals make dire predictions for decades that never came to fruition. We know by experience that they're frauds, but the younger generations are true believers!

@RandalColling

Жыл бұрын

Well Steve....democrats were lying then too!

@Victor-vj5ds

Жыл бұрын

This ng scientist never believed it was getting colder 50 years ago, that was entirely the media looking at one scientific report suggesting climate change could make some places colder and running with it claiming the next ice age was coming, a lot of what you hear was never said by or believed by scientists but regardless their credibility was lowered by the media and people like you went along with it.

@uberboat4512

Жыл бұрын

Actually we use much less oil and gas back then. Also the ozone was definitely true to some degree.

This guy is awesome!

5%? 8%? How clueless can they get! And they even had to think. And guess!!

Frightening to see how ignorant these officials are.

@mike02454

Жыл бұрын

That's the problem with paying attention... once you see this, you can't unsee it... and realize it's very much the norm.

Science lesson: If carbon dioxide is currently roughly estimated at 400 PPM. Then it would be .04% of the troposheric content. CO2 only holds about 40% of the infrared radiation striking the Earth's surface. Even that eventually makes it out of our atmosphere back into space. It's like a blanket that self regulates, or like a thermostat that maintains a comfortable surface temperature. There are a lot of misnomers about the greenhouse effect. If the greenhouse effect could so easily run away and heat the surface of the Earth to an unlivable Venus like temperature, then it would have occurred many times in the past, and none of us would be here. Earth has experienced what are referred to as greenhouse periods in geologic history. The P.E.T.M. 56 million years ago, for example. But it was the orbital variances and the axial tilt of Earth that were responsible. Not carbon dioxide. Carbon dioxide levels only rise when the co2 molecule is excited by heat. Heat on the surface is caused by infrared radiation exciting molecules, which is friction, which causes heat. Another misnomer is that methane is the most potent of all greenhouse gases. Technically, It is. But methane can not exist for too long in the presence of oxygen because it oxidizes into water and carbon dioxide, Ending it's role in the carbon cycle. Anthropogenic warming theory leaves out water's role as the most prevalent greenhouse gas. Al Gore made that statement very early on in this conspiracy theory. It's in his "fictional movie." Water vapor is the only reason why any of us are alive today. Water vapor contains a specific amount of carbon dioxide from winter to summer, from greenhouse period to glacial period. Water absorbs carbon dioxide when it is cold, and it emits carbon dioxide when it is warm. It rises and falls with the amount of infrared radiation that is striking the earth's surface. Take the money out of the climate change conspiracy theory, and nobody will be talking about it anymore.

@markcook3570

Жыл бұрын

Nice science lesson...

@lilyflower4962

Жыл бұрын

Very well stated. All life on this planet is definitely under threat, but NOT from the climate!

@s.muller8688

Жыл бұрын

@@lilyflower4962 The planet is not in danger,....We are.!

@MrMichaelBCurtis

Жыл бұрын

remember, we do not know how much CO2 is needed to raise the earths temperature. Mars a smaller planet has the same tonnage of CO2 as the earth, instead of a half a percent of their atmosphere it is 95 percent of it's atmosphere, and Mars is frigid. So CO2 is a greenhouse gas, but we don't know how much it takes to make a difference, all we do know is if it gets below 300 PPM the plants start dying, and we are trying to be net zero, and we are fighting forest fires, the natural CO2 plant savers, we could kill the planet trying to save it.

@beebob1279

Жыл бұрын

What a well written explanation. Thanks. I learned quite a bit from your comment.

Unfreekin’ believable! And these are people WORKING in trying to effect a change. Scary ignorance!

According to Park Maitland’s website, the school is run by Spring Education Group. Spring Education Group itself is owned by a Chinese-based investment group, Primavera Capital Group.

This is a perfect example of the government jumping into an industry and "just doing something" to make it appear that they are more capable than industry, regardless of the "little" details.

@DanA-ls8og

Жыл бұрын

It's a perfect example of government inventing a crisis to justify more and more controls.

@neilkurzman4907

Жыл бұрын

This is a perfect example of a bunch of people who have no idea what you’re talking about. Trying to make a decision. Including the narrator. Oh look this is a really small number. I should be able to ignore then. He’s just as ignorant as the people he’s calling out.

@myman8336

Жыл бұрын

@@neilkurzman4907 Do you even know what clouds are made of bud..? Cause that's your real Global Warmer right there.. Are you gonna blow 🌬 them off planet with a really Big Fan..?

@aowi7280

Жыл бұрын

The same as gun control.

@scottjohnson7780

Жыл бұрын

@@aowi7280 Perfect example.

This is EXACTLY correct, the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere is pathetically small, plants are right on the edge of suffocation. If we put more CO2 in the atmosphere plant life would explode with vibrancy & then when the trees began to multiply the global temperature would become milder. They do NOT want more life on Earth, they want LESS.

@kensmith5694

Жыл бұрын

No, increasing CO2 doesn't make plant life do a lot better. Plant life is adapted to a world with about 300PPM of CO2. The CO2 content right now is over 400PPM. There is no huge increase in plant life and some varieties are actually having trouble. We need water to drink but we can also drown.

@Dorakuwel

Жыл бұрын

@@kensmith5694 You should actually look at the evidence instead of just trusting "the narrative" as it will limit your ability to critically think through this stuff. The reality is that there has been MUCH more CO2 in the biosphere in the past & the plant life was much more plentiful as a result. We have been though many surges in the CO2 amount & the plants went through greening surges as a result, but unfortunately so much of the CO2 of the past is now locked away in limestone & fossil fuels. Even just with the amount of extra CO2 we have released into the biosphere since the industrial revolution has measurably increased the greening of the planet, so you are completely incorrect about this. The fact is that the evidence shows our star the Sun is the only significant source of any change in climate on Earth & when the sun increases the temperature on Earth, the amount of CO2 goes up as a result.

@jamesbooth3360

Жыл бұрын

@@kensmith5694 Ken with all due respect, you are simply wrong. Increased co2 increases the health and size of plants. This has been shown by simple teenage science fair projects. Also, with more co2 the plants require significantly less water since they develop fewer structures to take in Co2. I have seen estimates that with a doubling of co2 the Sahara desert would bloom and reduce the severity and frequency of hurricanes impacting North America. Also, having a bunch of biologists and geologists in the family I have had the benefit of the truth. As a retired businessman, all I can say is if someone comes to me saying in exchange for all my liberty and freedom he will control the weather, I say bulls**t!

@jimbo32234

Жыл бұрын

@@kensmith5694 Some greenhouse owners use CO2 generators to increase yields.

@joseantoniocastro1486

Жыл бұрын

@@kensmith5694 Yes it does. Green houses for commercial vegetables use CO2 generators machines in order to increase the percentage of CO2 inside the green house to make the crops grow faster and bigger. Go to a green house farmer and you see it by yourself.

True perspective on CO2 and the electric vehicle myths.

From .03 to below .02 and plant life starts dying off, then it's obvious what a drastic change from .03 to .04 can do to the world around us, by your logic

I learned the proportions of Nitrogen, Oxygen, and CO2 in 7th grade earth science. Not sure what’s worse….the fact that no one on the panel knows this, or the fact that these panelists have never been curious enough to find out. Or the fact that obviously these panelists have never had anyone ask this question to them before. Sad on all sides.

@caerleon87

Жыл бұрын

Exactly.. I do not understand american school grades [i am in the uk] but any reasonably bright school kid would know the atmosphere is more or less 80% nitrogen, 20% oxygen, and yet these so called educated politicians do not!!! Seriously stupid..

@joselopez-he1mc

Жыл бұрын

I bet they dont know that it was much higher before modern man started walking.

@dalie95327

Жыл бұрын

All they are interested in is passing laws and taxing co2

@SIPEROTH

Жыл бұрын

@@caerleon87 Reasonably bright school kid? So two to three students every school. So very very few people. Get a mike and go out asking people on what our atmosphere is contained from and you will be shocked on how few know.

@Skyte100

Жыл бұрын

Yeah no ones gonna remember it. Thats stuff you'll probably forget by the end of the year.

So they just guessing at it?😂 Get out of office!

We've become stupid and have no idea what we're doing

My cousin has a bumper sticker that says "Climate Change - The Religion of the Stupid".

@brianmcgovern9005

Жыл бұрын

Priceless!

@dimitriosfreedom9282

Жыл бұрын

Your cousin should be careful because he/she might have their car vandalized by an unhinged, rabid, violent, intolerant socialist/leftist cultist. Greetings from Australia.

@bartsimpson8616

Жыл бұрын

they gonna arest him .

@Fuzcapp

Жыл бұрын

He insults the stupid.

@Bobbynutty

Жыл бұрын

Way this planet is going they will be able to cover the vehicle completely in stickers

When they said 5%, I actually felt upset. It upset me to think that they could even think that. Fun fact: a concentration of 0.5% C02 is the US occupational safety limit for an 8 hour period. 1.5% is known to cause light symptoms in some people, at 3% more severe symptoms can present, and at 7% - 10%, there’s a significant chance of a human falling unconscious and suffocating to death. 5% wasn’t just a bad answer, it’s an answer that shows such a fundamental lack of knowledge on one of the core elements of what their panel is meant to assess, that it’s impossible for me to feel comfortable with these people dealing with anything emissions related.

@jasondashney

Жыл бұрын

I that would've been a great response, telling them that at 5% it becomes a legitimate medical problem, and that at 7% like she suggested, it can be fatal.

@contemplating1015

Жыл бұрын

👏👏👏👌

@hOurworld11

Жыл бұрын

Cheers for that.

@TemporalWolf

Жыл бұрын

They are industry panelists, not politicians or scientists, who were there advocating for less regulation on behalf of construction associations. Y'all crucifying your own people because all you can see is "woke".

@ceoatcrystalsoft4942

Жыл бұрын

Stop electing morons and start voting for scientists then

Wow, that seems so unlikely, but this is the world we are in. Asking that question in a social situation is a good way to kill any further social contact with that person. I've done it few times and it's "deer in the headlights" time. One guy went right to "oh, you are a denier". I've never been able to ask my next question - what does ECS mean and what is the value? Trick question, of course, I wouldn't expect any reasonable answer as there isn't one really.

After following the climate change narrative for decades, and knowing human history, I am far more concerned for the freedom and rights of my children and grandchildren being taken from them in the name of climate change, than the actual effects of climate change.

@seanmcnallyactor

7 ай бұрын

You are more worried about people driving electric cars than parts of the planet being uninhabitable?

@mdog6726

7 ай бұрын

It is a narrative. Last time I checked plants need cO2 to produce oxygen.

@jjhpor

7 ай бұрын

@@mdog6726 ...but the grains that provide the bulk of our food rapidly lose their ability to do that above 90 degrees F. You need to check more of the story.

@mdog6726

7 ай бұрын

@@jjhpor are you still following the government food pyramid? Grains are causing most of our health issues.

@Kyle-sr6jm

6 ай бұрын

The planet has been hotter, and colder. People did fine. Climate cultusts tend to ignore that we are in a warm period and doing very well. When it is cold, humans civilization does not do well. Saying a rise in CO2 will make the planet uninhabitable, proves you have zero knowledge of the past temperatures we know of.

Thank you for exposing the ignorant liars and criminals.

My high school level of chemistry allowed me two decades later to guess “less than .1 percent”. It’s baffling that people who make their living out of it not only don’t know the actual number but actually missed it by a factor of 100-200 times…

@hongo3870

Жыл бұрын

Its an actual conspiracy led by clueless idiots who laugh and guess. Insane

@pinksupremacy6076

Жыл бұрын

Same

@signa8

Жыл бұрын

@ashes-7425 from Britanica: "at the elevation of the planet’s mean radius it is about 95 bars, or 95 times the atmospheric pressure at Earth’s surface. This is the same pressure found at a depth of about 1 km (0.6 mile) in Earth’s oceans." Did you ever stop to think that using extraplanatary examples may not win you any arguments? You are right that it's mostly CO2, but it's a dumb thing to mention if you're going to pretend it's the same thing at all. The point is, stop repeating things you hear from these people, because they will always twist facts in their favor.

@signa8

Жыл бұрын

@@ashes-7425 apologies. I thought you were saying that greenhouse gasses will certainly kill us because look at Venus. Being hyperbolic, of course, but no need to rehash it.

@saudade2100

Жыл бұрын

Rodolfo that is exactly what I was thinking, the basic high school education.......I'm thinking even earlier than high school........78% nitrogen, 21% oxygen. I would not expect them to say 0.04 percent, but I would at least expect them to say 1% takes in everything else that's not nitrogen and oxygen. Any tiny less than 1% number, I could understand not having the exact number on the tip of their tongue, but five percent? Seven percent? Disgraceful.

Always the same! Those in power know best.....One wonders why we have 'experts in their field of knowledge' when politicians make policies they know little about.

C02 is heavily than air. I'd like to see them explain to the world how it all gets up there in the first olace when its heavier than air?

@Cyiel568

2 ай бұрын

Pretty simple : density of air and carbon dioxide depends of pressure and temperature. You should know that.

Saying these people are qualified to make laws, is like saying a McDonald's employee is qualified to build a nuclear reactor.

@dogface7903

Жыл бұрын

Or a decent burger! 😂

@MarkNOTW

Жыл бұрын

I have more confidence in the McDonald’s employee

@obijuan3004

Жыл бұрын

Those are not law makers, they were invited for Doug LaMalfa to make a video for his website and people think its real. Its just a show for KZread. Notice that no names are posted you got punked.

@drewh1071

Жыл бұрын

Bureaucrats don't make laws.

They are so disconnected I don’t think they even feel stupid. What a pack of clowns living in an alternate universe Unreal

The woman claims "... we know that transportation causes 49% of CO2..." which is also completely wrong. According to the EPA , "greenhouse gas emissions from transportation account for about 27% of total U.S. greenhouse gas emissions". It is embarrassing how ignorant those so-called "experts" are.

@MarkNOTW

Жыл бұрын

I’m fairly certain if memory serves correct that 97% of the atmospheric CO2 comes from natural sources

@jojo-beans

Жыл бұрын

I was confused about this too, like it makes sense that transportation people wouldn't know co2 concentration cause they just would never be dealing with that, but it seemed crazy that she somehow got that statistic wrong, but I looked it up and I guess she was just talking about California specifically lol

@MarkNOTW

Жыл бұрын

@@jojo-beans her number is so far off, it’s dystopian

@damos3000

Жыл бұрын

Greenhouse gas emissions are not the same as Carbon emissions. Transport has had considerable efforts put into reducing greenhouse gasses.

@countryjoe3551

Жыл бұрын

But she certainly sounded confident in her stupidity, so there's that.

How stoopid does a politician have to be when they spew out facts w/out knowing facts.

A ship of fools.

The climate crazies have become more annoying than vegans at a BBQ. The sky isn’t falling and even if it was there is nothing you could do about it anyway.

@dodieodie498

Жыл бұрын

The "crisis" is what it's always been. Meant to serve as an excuse or tool to accomplish a certain unrelated agenda. There are a few such scams going on right now.

@davidgribble263

Жыл бұрын

Handing these people money is the last thing that will help that is for sure !!!!!

@davebenz8271

Жыл бұрын

“vegans at a BBQ”! Epic!

@paulrousseau9144

Жыл бұрын

You must be quite stupid if you have not noticed the increases in severe weather in recent years. Open you eyes, and stop quaffing fossil-fueled propaganda.

@Dee-sn5uh

Жыл бұрын

Exactly!

What’s even more concerning is they don’t know, but want to overhaul an entire industry. 🙄

@Pers0n97

Жыл бұрын

Oh they know. Their plan is to have us stop any form of industry and instead rely on china for it.

@robertevans9354

Жыл бұрын

Bingo patriot ,see you in the trenches just like Ukraine

@MichaelSmith-jj3pz

Жыл бұрын

WITH OUR MONEY!

@chadcadsonvii5258

Жыл бұрын

It's worse than that, they are going to use it to enslave you!

@1dayUllC

Жыл бұрын

@@MichaelSmith-jj3pz And our livestock, our lands, our supply chains, our vehicles, and our properties, and our freedom, etc.

Great question!

If i was asked to reduce CO2 the first thing I would look at is what the current measure is, these folk are unreal. Something tells me its nothing to do with CO2

The ignorance of policy makers is unbelieveable. If they don't even know that, how can they even begin to understand all the other absurd, hopeless and corrupt proposals thrown at them?

@KK-eg3em

Жыл бұрын

You'd be surprised, but this is in everything. The decision makers in this world don't ever understand what it is that they are making decisions on.

@jayhutch5186

Жыл бұрын

There’s no ignorance. They know exactly what they’re doing.

@fuzzywzhe

Жыл бұрын

They don't.

@stevecobb2592

Жыл бұрын

Ignorance is a requirement for the current global cabal , sell your soul , but dont worry we'll promote you

@wesir427

Жыл бұрын

You realize the guy just said it went from .03% to .04% in the last few decades right? You don't see any reason for concern about the amount of Co2 in our atmosphere increasing by 33% in the last few decades on a planet that's billions of years old?

In addition to what he taught them, the human contribution to that is 1/100th (which is. 0004%!). This whole thing is MADNESS. People with their hearts in the right place, but whose ignorance on basic aspects of this is so badly exploited. Absolute MADNESS.

@darkwingscooter9637

Жыл бұрын

It's worse than that even, because the measurement error and internal variability of natural flows is larger than the human contribution.

@LRRPFco52

Жыл бұрын

I have yet to see someone who is pro-conformist on the climate change propaganda know the difference between the stratosphere and troposphere, but they sure know that we need to enact a list of massive changes to our energy production and transportation infrastructure. They are never aware of how extensive the raw materials supply side needs to be, or what countries those come from.

@plantfeeder6677

Жыл бұрын

The road to hell(on earth)is paved with good intentions.

@darkwingscooter9637

Жыл бұрын

@@LRRPFco52 Not doing your own research makes you stupid.

@atatterson6992

Жыл бұрын

Many of these cult members DO NOT have their heart in the right place. They either want to appear "uber-woke" amongst their friends, get rich, or both... no exception.

0,04% total co2... 0,002% is our contribution to that.

You can tell they think it is a pointless process. They are dumb. What they don't realize is this is a very important task to the livelihood of America.

A better question would be to ask them who they are being paid by to front for this fraud!!

@jogeorge9752

Жыл бұрын

Exactly

@neilreynolds3858

Жыл бұрын

And the answer would be that the money ultimately comes from governments. No conflict of interests here, right?

@AG-M23

Жыл бұрын

WEF

@OneofInfinity.

Жыл бұрын

Initials: GS, founder of the rebellion extinction cult.

Whenever someone pretends to not hear a clearly worded question, you know they’re in trouble.

@northernfox6420

8 ай бұрын

And asks for it to be repeated...🔥

@jgreen9361

7 ай бұрын

Or that they know it’s a stupid question, but one that has a politically loaded misunderstanding behind it that you need to be accurate in answering……

@keithwilson6060

7 ай бұрын

@@jgreen9361 Nope, no ambiguity in these questions.

@typetersen8809

7 ай бұрын

And it's a question that clearly, they had not expected. And therefore, had not pondered.😂

@DrProgNerd

7 ай бұрын

PARENT: "Who tracked mud into the house." KID (stalling): "What?........Who tracked what in the house?"

No need to go electric, you can go amish.

So sad that so many people do not understand basic science.

The fact that we are only .02% away from reaching a point where there won't be enough CO2 for plants is perhaps the most alarming part of this. If anything, it sounds like we need more CO2 in order to make sure we keep a buffer to keep plants alive.

@davidmurphy7332

Жыл бұрын

That would be a reduction of more than 50% of current CO2 levels, and that’s not going to happen. CO2 “reduction” is about offsetting our current CO2 production. Before the Industrial Revolution, the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere was around 0.028% and it wasn’t as if plants were struggling to exist back then

@21Roofdog

Жыл бұрын

Actualy yes, we need far more co2. In greenhouses we increase co2 levels to 1600ppm to get optimum growing for plants. So yes co2 is just a madeup problem by idiots who scream the world is ending. We had those idiots for the entire history of humankind. Screaming the world is ending on the corners of streets. But now we got some morons in goverment who actualy listen to them. There is no climate problem, there are enviremental problems like the distruction of rainforrest for those vegetarian idiots who want soy beans. Or the plastics which get dumped in the ocean. But climate change is just a scam to make more money over the back of hard working people

@alanchilds1456

Жыл бұрын

@@davidmurphy7332 didn't know they had the ability to measure C02 200 years ago

@johnwirk

Жыл бұрын

@@alanchilds1456 They just make up numbers with their paid for "scientists". I don't care what they scream, what charts they make because it's all bull $h!t. We nor they can control volcanic emissions, vents opened up from earthquakes and the like. Just the usual occurrence of natural events on a yearly basis completely offset the efforts and "progress" these dimwits claim are made.

@johnwirk

Жыл бұрын

@@alanchilds1456 They constantly parrot rising oceans by "X" year from their "leaders" only for those "leaders" to buy multi million dollar mansions and property on the very coast lines they predict will be under water. It's all a joke to them and nothing more than a power grab. Plain and simple.

So I used to be a commercial diver. Gas mixtures, pressures, and how your body reacts to different breathing mediums under different pressures was nailed into our heads. We were taught the atmosphere contains roughly 21% oxygen and roughly 75% nitrogen. That leaves 4-5% left for "other gasses." And these people think CO2 makes up 5-8% of our atmosphere. Incredible.

@user-zt2vf6vx7p

Жыл бұрын

The "other gases" is actually closer to 1%, further reinforcing your point. It's criminal how uneducated these policy makers are upon examination.

@matttaylor817

Жыл бұрын

@T yeah I couldn't remember exactly how much nitrogen but I knew I was in the ballpark

@warrenpuckett4203

Жыл бұрын

So why do greenhouse add co2 to make the plants grow faster and larger.

@colebyrnes7889

Жыл бұрын

@@warrenpuckett4203 Are you asking why plants can thrive off of more CO2 while humans can't?

@Mr22brian22

Жыл бұрын

21% Oxygen 78% Nitrogen which actually leaves 1% of which they must claim that Carbon Dioxide makes up 0.4% of….

WAY TO GO --BRAVO Lamalfa

Common sense spoken aloud is always such a breath of fresh air. Look at how calm and collected he is, in contrast to the stunned people being questioned.

@beertje6394

Жыл бұрын

Pretending that the % of CO2 in the atmosphere is in any way relevant or a number ur supposed to know if u claim to be an expert on the topic is not common sense. It is showing that you are staggeringly ignorant on the theory.

@360lootgoon3

Жыл бұрын

@@beertje6394 yes, the ones complaining about CO2 not knowing the % of CO2 is not relevant at all... Who’s staggeringly ignorant again?

@gavinmeinzer6024

Жыл бұрын

@@360lootgoon3 Even though it would seem that CO2 levels are very low since they make up 0.04% of our atmosphere, that represents an increase of 43% since the industrial revolution began. Not only that, but with CO2, even a miniscule change from 0.04% to 0.05% can have devastating effects on the planet. I'm not sure what percent of CO2 would have to be in the atmosphere before you would start to care, but it doesn't take much to change drastically. And either way, Fossil Fuels are a finite resource. We will run out and that is a fact. Why not invest in tech that can give us renewable energy from the sun, wind, and water. Or invest in nuclear. You really think pumping millions of tons of CO2, a proven greenhouse gas and nonbreathable gas is fine for either people or the planet?

@beertje6394

Жыл бұрын

@@360lootgoon3 Correct the % of CO2 in the atmosphere is entirely irrelevant to climate change. It is about the increase in CO2 in ppm and how this inhibits the earth from regulating its temperature.

@ripvanrevs

Жыл бұрын

@@beertje6394 Are you two communists or just trying to destroy humans on your own?

Doug LaMalfa -- living proof of the power of critical thinking, a rarity in today's world.

@grahamhodge8313

Жыл бұрын

LaMalfa and critical thinking? Please don't joke about it.

@ronclark9724

Жыл бұрын

I could care less whether the public chooses to buy solar panels or windmill turbines, but I do care whether the US government decides to buy and pay for to install both for everyone's home or business providing these corporations a government a large subsidy at the US taxpayer's expense... Are we a socialist nation or a capitalist/free enterprise nation? If you choose to buy and install solar panels or windmill turbines, DO SO AT YOUR EXPENSE! NOT MINE!

@doommonger7784

Жыл бұрын

@@grahamhodge8313 Well he could be like those idiots when stumped then try to laugh off his question. Maybe that's what happens when democrat hive minds congregate. Don't tell me you're a follower.

@lapdawg60

Жыл бұрын

The communists in Moscow a hundred years ago removed guys like LaMalfa from the planet for just that reason. You can't have people who can think, let alone critically. They have this pesky way of seeing through the communist lies and bullshit.

@timb83

Жыл бұрын

No. Anti-critical though. "Common sense" is a thought terminating tactic used by people who can't substantiate their claims.

Politicians are not expected to have any knowledge. They are elected for their intentions.

What an idiotic question to ask politicians. This is a question appropriate either for a conference of scientists, or to be asked of scientists who visit a gathering of politicians to provide scientific expert opinion.

“Maybe you’ll bring generators…” I’m laughing so hard

@stapleman007

Жыл бұрын

Luckily, they don't produce C02 emissions, generators run on unicorn farts!

@bryanoliver5550

Жыл бұрын

@@stapleman007 ; You see , I did not know that , think of what you could accomplish without a Democrat ?

@marcorodrigues8303

Жыл бұрын

Thank you yes Generators #

@HoChiHoChiPlays

Жыл бұрын

Hey maybe set up wind turbines there? Remote area, open field, sounds like a good spot.

@jeremiahwasabearfrog9956

Жыл бұрын

​@@HoChiHoChiPlays We have plenty of those, they don't produce 1/10 of what nuclear plants could produce on less than half the land used for turbines.

There's always been "climate change," it's called Spring, Summer, Fall, and Winter. C02 is good for plants & animals; plants flourish with more C02, animals eat the plants & flourish, people eat the animals and plants and flourish. Or, we can cut C02 and start dying out. Which do you choose?

@snex000

Жыл бұрын

Seasons are not climate change. Saying that makes you look just as dumb as these bureaucrats.

@MalleusDei275

Жыл бұрын

Chech out the Younger Dryas period....

@yeost187

Жыл бұрын

The compliant sheep would come back with: No! Climate change is measured in 30 year weather cycles!!!! and then they would fail in noting what the weather was like 30 years ago, and what the prevailing theory was back then.. Part of me wonders if they fully consumed enough of the climate change koolaid, and will plan their own little "Jones Town like celebration", in the next 6 years. But then I realize, just how amazing its going to be, in watching them realize their junk "doom clock" in Chicago, wasn't real.. 🤭

@JuniorFarquar

Жыл бұрын

It's hilarious seeing the CO2 truck behind the woke campus refilling the cafeteria and science bldg tanks. Not to mention at the greenhouses at the horticultural annex

@The_Unobtainium

Жыл бұрын

CO2 is also very good for a couple of mighty families out there and thier plans to make us their slaves. Globally.